Richard Dawkins discusses his faith in science over religion
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 май 2023
- Want to see more videos and virtual events?
✅ Subscribe to this channel and turn on notifications: ruclips.net/user/iqsquare...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intelligence Squared has established itself as the leading forum for live, agenda-setting debates, talks and discussions around the world. Our aim is to promote a global conversation that enables people to make informed decisions about the issues that matter, in the company of the world's greatest minds and orators.
Follow Intelligence Squared on:
👉 Facebook page: / intelligence2
👉 Twitter page: / intelligence2
📌 Website: www.intelligencesquared.com/
#IntelligenceSquared #IQ2 #IntelligenceSquaredPlus #Science #Religion #RichardDawkins
![Who Shares The Blame for the Mental Health Epidemic? - Will Self [2014] | Intelligence Squared](/img/1.gif)
He has faith in the honesty of the scientist who depend on official subsides
Most are based at universities so no agenda except education
And bias is pretty much ruled out by the process he described
No, he has faith in the scientific process and the scientific process does not depend on one or even a handful of scientists.
Faith in the scientific process is different than faith in a religion or supernatural being, but it's still faith. Trust in something you can't prove is 100% reliable. Science has let us down many times, and will again. That's why it's faith and trust instead of pure fact.
Where the two faiths align is they both have a set of facts that are being interpreted, so it's really faith in an interpretation of fact on both accounts. Science calls them theories, religion calls them sects or doctrines.
Religion is *not* based on any facts.
No, no, no, not the same, the sun will rise over the horizon tomorrow, it's a fact....God exist is Bull..!
Its not faith in science. Its knowledge and understanding in scientific processes
It is a faith. It is a belief in something that isn’t seen. Unless you’re there doing the experiment you have no idea what they did.
@kwaviddong7875 yes you do. The methodology is well document reviewed and reproduced. Many are videoed and you can observe it
Plus you knoe the people conducting the tests are real they are qualified and their work has to be reviewed and assessed.
Not remotely the same
@@johnchambers9836 send me a link to a video where they watch a monkey turn into a human… thanks
@@kwaviddong7875That’s so stupid it’s actually sad.
Sound is too low!
Einstein said, “In light of such a harmony in the universe that I, with my limited human mind, can determine, there are still people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me in support of views like these.” [26]
Question: "Why did Einstein find it so difficult to answer yes or no to the existence of a Creator?" Was it based on science or illusions?
He was asked: Why did Anthony retreat from atheism? Is this regression based on science or illusions?
And what do they all believe in one Creator?
This creation, the structure of the universe, the
Foods, the tongue that tastes, the teeth that grind, the stomach that digests, the removal of waste from the body, the oxygen, the lungs, the eyes, the sexual desire, and many other things, and this is indicative of nothing. Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Rivers and seas and the creatures in them and the rain that sows the earth beyond
It's very with a lot of fruits
Nothing creates something
Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Go and see what religion commands you to worship. One Creator created everything, not three, not more, not less, not idols, but one. Go see for yourself you will find only one religion.
Faith as used here is better said as "trust" in order to clarify its meaning. Trust is usually a reasonable assumption of future events from observations and evidence of past events. It is not believed in wholeheartedly or without demonstration like religious faith is. It is given when adequate evidence supports its existence and can be revoked when faulty reasoning impedes its utility in furthering understanding. That is what it means to have "faith" in science as Professor Dawkins puts it. It is not equivalent to this knuckle-dragger meme of "scientism" that uneducated grifters haplessly throw around online.
But even science isn't perfect. Many studies are funded by corporate interests, scientific magazines look for what sounds more interesting, which leads to prioritizing controversial studies even if they haven't been replicated or have methodological problems, while studies that dispute or confirm some previous claim aren't as popular. There might be bias in the scientific magazines and media about what to publish...
You are absolutely right, but I prefer something that tries to improve itself constantly than something which claims to be perfect and stays stagnant.
Ulanazar should seek treatment to for his paranoid disorder.
🤢
@@Lars-xq1mi You don't need religion to be a dogmatic zealot
@@ulaznar no you don’t but it clearly lends itself to dogmatic zealotry doesn’t it? 😆 you know, what with religious beliefs being fundamentally based on dogma and all.
And as for your other point, yes the funding of science can be subject to political, financial or social biases etc. it CAN be poorly carried out. But there are layers and layers of regulations (see GLP, ISO standards), inspection bodies (MHRA, FDA, UKAS) and the like, and a wealth of critical peer review for findings to be published and accepted by the wider scientific community. These safety nets are designed to weed out poor data from sound data.
If things aren’t up to scratch that’s because people are dicks sometimes. It’s not a fault of the scientific method itself.
Turn up the volume, plz
Social Sciences are not rigorous.
Einstein said, “In light of such a harmony in the universe that I, with my limited human mind, can determine, there are still people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me in support of views like these.” [26]
Question: "Why did Einstein find it so difficult to answer yes or no to the existence of a Creator?" Was it based on science or illusions?
He was asked: Why did Anthony retreat from atheism? Is this regression based on science or illusions?
And what do they all believe in one Creator?
This creation, the structure of the universe, the
Foods, the tongue that tastes, the teeth that grind, the stomach that digests, the removal of waste from the body, the oxygen, the lungs, the eyes, the sexual desire, and many other things, and this is indicative of nothing. Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Rivers and seas and the creatures in them and the rain that sows the earth beyond
It's very with a lot of fruits
Nothing creates something
Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Go and see what religion commands you to worship. One Creator created everything, not three, not more, not less, not idols, but one. Go see for yourself you will find only one religion.
Thanks
You are misleading us with the Caption, What he said is different from what the caption intends to import to the Listenership.
Einstein said, “In light of such a harmony in the universe that I, with my limited human mind, can determine, there are still people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me in support of views like these.” [26]
Question: "Why did Einstein find it so difficult to answer yes or no to the existence of a Creator?" Was it based on science or illusions?
He was asked: Why did Anthony retreat from atheism? Is this regression based on science or illusions?
And what do they all believe in one Creator?
This creation, the structure of the universe, the
Foods, the tongue that tastes, the teeth that grind, the stomach that digests, the removal of waste from the body, the oxygen, the lungs, the eyes, the sexual desire, and many other things, and this is indicative of nothing. Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Rivers and seas and the creatures in them and the rain that sows the earth beyond
It's very with a lot of fruits
Nothing creates something
Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Go and see what religion commands you to worship. One Creator created everything, not three, not more, not less, not idols, but one. Go see for yourself you will find only one religion.
Facts..... not fanciful ideas
Cannot hear this. Such a shame.
Einstein said, “In light of such a harmony in the universe that I, with my limited human mind, can determine, there are still people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me in support of views like these.” [26]
Question: "Why did Einstein find it so difficult to answer yes or no to the existence of a Creator?" Was it based on science or illusions?
He was asked: Why did Anthony retreat from atheism? Is this regression based on science or illusions?
And what do they all believe in one Creator?
This creation, the structure of the universe, the
Foods, the tongue that tastes, the teeth that grind, the stomach that digests, the removal of waste from the body, the oxygen, the lungs, the eyes, the sexual desire, and many other things, and this is indicative of nothing. Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Rivers and seas and the creatures in them and the rain that sows the earth beyond
It's very with a lot of fruits
Nothing creates something
Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Go and see what religion commands you to worship. One Creator created everything, not three, not more, not less, not idols, but one. Go see for yourself you will find only one religion.
Sounds like everything to believe in.
You need a lot of faith to believe that nothing created everything, probably the only thing that fascinates me about Richard. It's sad that he refuses to debate because he knows what the outcome would be.
That not what science is saying. They are saying the universe came out of something they don't understand. Only about 5% of the energy and gravity of the universe is made of the 100 some odd elements. The rest is not understood.
Didn't your god supposedly create something from nothing (spoke all things into existence from nothing)
Something from nothing is a theist claim and not an atheists claim
@@Neilazbiker absolutely false statement. First of all if you know what gravity is made of then go and claim your Nobel prize, secondly, all of them believe that everything came from literally nothing some of the big names include Richard Dawkins and Krauss. Even in textbooks they teach that the universe came from literally nothing, get your facts straight and change your religion, you're always welcomed in Christianity (the real one).
Einstein said, “In light of such a harmony in the universe that I, with my limited human mind, can determine, there are still people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me in support of views like these.” [26]
Question: "Why did Einstein find it so difficult to answer yes or no to the existence of a Creator?" Was it based on science or illusions?
He was asked: Why did Anthony retreat from atheism? Is this regression based on science or illusions?
And what do they all believe in one Creator?
This creation, the structure of the universe, the
Foods, the tongue that tastes, the teeth that grind, the stomach that digests, the removal of waste from the body, the oxygen, the lungs, the eyes, the sexual desire, and many other things, and this is indicative of nothing. Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Rivers and seas and the creatures in them and the rain that sows the earth beyond
It's very with a lot of fruits
Nothing creates something
Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Go and see what religion commands you to worship. One Creator created everything, not three, not more, not less, not idols, but one. Go see for yourself you will find only one religion.
You don’t need no faith at all.
In quantum fluctuations this is the case all the time.
Particles pop in and out of existence.
Also I have a feeling that the universe is eternal. (No beginning or end, for there to be absolutely nothing ever would be a paradox on reality itself. Reality can’t exist in such a state).
When the universe reaches its end and everything else has died out and nothing is left but black holes, which contain all the matter.
Only then will all the black holes begin to merge with one another.
Eventually 2 mega black holes will collide with one another and when the energy coefficient in its singularity exceeds the gravitational force of the black hole, it will explode once again ( big bang) and all the particles in the singularity which were under enormous gravitational pressure, will explode outwards, with the space that’s been contained inside the black hole exploding outward and expanding at an exponential rate (inflation)
All the matter will be released as gas clouds and will eventually begin to cool and form stars and rocky planets.
So again creating a new universe with perhaps completely different physic to our own.
In other words the universe is eternal.
And each universe is part of a massive multiverses structure.
I also believe that smaller black holes that fade out tend to released all the folded space outward again which is basically what we know as dark energy.
Anyways these are my personal interpretations that make sense to me.
I could be, and probably am way off.
But for the time being it sounds logical.
One of those rare confessions of Richard about his faith in scientism. I commend him for doing that as with Richard Lewontin’s “Billions and Billions of Demons”.
Einstein said, “In light of such a harmony in the universe that I, with my limited human mind, can determine, there are still people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me in support of views like these.” [26]
Question: "Why did Einstein find it so difficult to answer yes or no to the existence of a Creator?" Was it based on science or illusions?
He was asked: Why did Anthony retreat from atheism? Is this regression based on science or illusions?
And what do they all believe in one Creator?
This creation, the structure of the universe, the
Foods, the tongue that tastes, the teeth that grind, the stomach that digests, the removal of waste from the body, the oxygen, the lungs, the eyes, the sexual desire, and many other things, and this is indicative of nothing. Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Rivers and seas and the creatures in them and the rain that sows the earth beyond
It's very with a lot of fruits
Nothing creates something
Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Go and see what religion commands you to worship. One Creator created everything, not three, not more, not less, not idols, but one. Go see for yourself you will find only one religion.
@@user-rp5ye7uc6d😂
And so is the theistic arguments. They, also, are based on rigorous examination, thinking, putting hypothesis forward, being peer reviewed and being based on evidence handed down to us (which itself enjoys a majority agreed opinion, as to its veracity).
Except, that science CANNOT explain everything. It's good at 'what' and 'how' answers, but very poor at 'why' questions.
To illustrate, here's some examples of tphenomenon that science cannot explain, yet humans experience these on a daily basis:
Origins of life (bio-chemistry)
Logical + mathematical truths
Metaphysical truths
Ethical beliefs
Aesthetic judgements
Science itself is not accessible through the scientific method
Intentional States of Consciousness.
When you cannot explain something, the correct course of action is to say "let's try and figure out what this isn't and come up with a likely explanation of what it is by process of elimination." It is not to say "God did it."
Further, it is an absurdity at best to say that religion is even remotely a process. They claim to know the answers from the start and insist they not be questioned. As for "why?" it is a question that must be asked in the appropriate context. It implies a will and/or a thinking agent, which no one has demonstrated the universe or anything "beyond" it to be, thus making it nonsensical to question "why" it was created until such time as that has been demonstrated to be reasonable.
Einstein said, “In light of such a harmony in the universe that I, with my limited human mind, can determine, there are still people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me in support of views like these.” [26]
Question: "Why did Einstein find it so difficult to answer yes or no to the existence of a Creator?" Was it based on science or illusions?
He was asked: Why did Anthony retreat from atheism? Is this regression based on science or illusions?
And what do they all believe in one Creator?
This creation, the structure of the universe, the
Foods, the tongue that tastes, the teeth that grind, the stomach that digests, the removal of waste from the body, the oxygen, the lungs, the eyes, the sexual desire, and many other things, and this is indicative of nothing. Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Rivers and seas and the creatures in them and the rain that sows the earth beyond
It's very with a lot of fruits
Nothing creates something
Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Go and see what religion commands you to worship. One Creator created everything, not three, not more, not less, not idols, but one. Go see for yourself you will find only one religion.
This is what is called SCIENTISM everybody! Dawkins is a joke and should’ve never became an influential figure.
Why anyone would listen to an atheist, who by his own admission is not intelligently designed, is mind blowing! When will people WAKE-UP and think for themselves. The Bible tells the end from the beginning. All Bible prophecies come to pass exactly as prophesied. That is proof that it the Word of God as only God knows the end from the beginning. Maranatha
Einstein said, “In light of such a harmony in the universe that I, with my limited human mind, can determine, there are still people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me in support of views like these.” [26]
Question: "Why did Einstein find it so difficult to answer yes or no to the existence of a Creator?" Was it based on science or illusions?
He was asked: Why did Anthony retreat from atheism? Is this regression based on science or illusions?
And what do they all believe in one Creator?
This creation, the structure of the universe, the
Foods, the tongue that tastes, the teeth that grind, the stomach that digests, the removal of waste from the body, the oxygen, the lungs, the eyes, the sexual desire, and many other things, and this is indicative of nothing. Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Rivers and seas and the creatures in them and the rain that sows the earth beyond
It's very with a lot of fruits
Nothing creates something
Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Go and see what religion commands you to worship. One Creator created everything, not three, not more, not less, not idols, but one. Go see for yourself you will find only one religion.
And than you have something to live for?
Wow, i believe in science, but it does'nt do anything for me. My belief in God, the Creator, makes me stronger, every day.
Einstein said, “In light of such a harmony in the universe that I, with my limited human mind, can determine, there are still people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me in support of views like these.” [26]
Question: "Why did Einstein find it so difficult to answer yes or no to the existence of a Creator?" Was it based on science or illusions?
He was asked: Why did Anthony retreat from atheism? Is this regression based on science or illusions?
And what do they all believe in one Creator?
This creation, the structure of the universe, the
Foods, the tongue that tastes, the teeth that grind, the stomach that digests, the removal of waste from the body, the oxygen, the lungs, the eyes, the sexual desire, and many other things, and this is indicative of nothing. Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Rivers and seas and the creatures in them and the rain that sows the earth beyond
It's very with a lot of fruits
Nothing creates something
Are you 100% sure that there is no constructor?
Go and see what religion commands you to worship. One Creator created everything, not three, not more, not less, not idols, but one. Go see for yourself you will find only one religion.
Jesus Is Lord
How does he feel about a religious scripture citing scientific information that took science over 1000 years to realise it was true.🥹