The injustice is this woman experienced is frightening. What is going on? Are these police just not trained? I hope she sues. When did we lose our rights? She was taken advantage of because they thought no one would care. Thank you for making a difference. I’m confident you won this case! God bless!😊❤🙏🏻
They're trained by government. Every so many years it gets worse. And they are thought to obey orders. I wish they would wake up. They are not taught to help citizens and protect citizens rights. Basically the reason why we had a police force to start with is to protect people. Instead They are taught that we are all out to harm them and it is them against us. Which we don't want to harm them. But they're being told we do. Why I is that ??? Out of 100,000 stops throughout the day how many times does a police officer get hurt? It should not be them against us, it should be all of us against government, and they're out there to protect all of us from overreach. They do not see that they are ponds at this point. Ponds are something you can sacrifice for the good of the higher-ups. . And these officers are nothing more than a human that they can sacrifice when things get rough. I hope one day they will wake up.
The not showing the defendant the results of the PBT is enough to cast reasonable doubt. As there's reasonable doubt the officer lied under oath. And with her vomiting a short time before the PBT, that could have resulted in an abnormally high reading. For the same reasons a PBT just after drinking will give a false high reading.
Inadmissible as evidence, but may be used as probable cause for an arrest. No reason to take it at the roadside or do their other stupid field sobriety tests. They will find reasons to fail you, not pass you. Gotta get that MADD money.
@@markbrown8097 Yep... can't be used as evidence to convict, however can be exculpatory as well as show no PC for arrest. If field test is 0.06+, definitely PC to take to station and try to get blood/breath for a confirmatory test. If PBT is 0.02... no F-ing PC no way.
I hate to bring it up, but I CANTON help it. We the MASSes have found ourselves KAREN way too much about a specific trial lately. READ between the lines Larry… 😂
Because if they would’ve questioned her, they would’ve looked like assholes. She was a very sympathetic witness and Toomy. She was telling the absolute truth of what happened that night.
wish I could hear the jury delibeate.... because I'm certain that someone in there has gotten sick after eating something disagreeable, someone has had their GPS do that to them with split highways and roads, and I'm very certain that someone has not had access to their phone when it mattered most.
She lied about the vomit. She lied about dropping off a work colleague. Her ability to follow the road rules are in question. And she refused the breath test at the station which would've proven either way. I'm not saying she is guilty but if i was on the jury i would have concerns about her honesty.
It's down to the threshold required for finding her guilty. Which is "beyond all reasonable doubt". There is clearly reasonable doubt as to whether she was DUI. Therefore the verdict must be not guilty. Telling lies is never a reason - on its' own - to find someone guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. This does mean that there are times when people get away with crimes. But that's better than having a system where too many innocent people get convicted.
Should have bleeped out the bit where she gave her address. Please protect your clients' privacy. Especially when it serves no purpose to broadcast personal details.
Those of us within the "DUI GUY SUBSCRIBER SILENT MAJORITY" absolutely Love you for this comment!!! 😂😂😂... This Guy gets us hooked on that good "Karen Read" Cr@ck and now is selling us non-descript wêëd... 😂... We need some more Albert, McCabe & Read debauchery... Yes, I could watch the trial myself but it's not the same without having the DUI GUY perspective "Play By Play"... 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I hope this isn't against lawtube rules but @collierlandry is doing a live in a few mins if you need a KR fix. It's to review the ME testimony today. 🤘
I have a question... when you were questioning your client, would you have gotten in trouble with the court had you said something like: so the officer showed you at the beginning that the device showed triple zeroes and he said so you know I'm not cheating, correct? She says yes. Then you say: Do you think it would it be safe to assume he was doing his best to show you he was being fair with you? We'll assume she would answer yes Then you continue But after the test the officer refused to show you the results, correct? Again she says yes. Then you scratch your chin for a moment like you're thinking and say Interesting... Prosecutor objects, you withdraw that last bit, but the jury hears it and that gets them to really focus on the pbt and ask themselves why wouldn't he just show her. Especially since he later says it showed the presence of alcohol Would you doing that bit of theatrics get you into any kind of trouble with the court?
I have my own PBT and I have tried different tests at .08, .15, and.20 with myself and other individuals during house parties. There is NO WAY at .165 she was reciting D thru Q and counting backwards with no mistakes (even though she went past 58). Also, walk and turn without losing balance (AND walking backward (perfectly). Lastly, there was no slurred speech. This provides reasonable doubt multiple ways that she was not under the influence, and secondly the credibility of the LEO calling out .165 (twice the legal limit) in court. PBT's are inadmissible, but they are pretty damn close to the expected result from a breathalyzer. Interested to hear what the jury heard in the next episode. Based on previous videos. jury's can pick out one thing, get laser focused, and convict over the silliest of things.
Sorry but I flat out don't believe she only had one shot. The shift ended at 1130, but she didn't leave till 230. As a server for 15yrs, I know for a fact that only reason you hang out after your shift is to have a drink.
I don't care how many shots she had! They should not be policing citizens. That is not what we gave them a job for. They were supposed to go after bad guys. They were never supposed to pull people over, stop them, ask for their papers, and if they did not obey throw them in jail. That is not why they are there to start with.
Bully cops have an attitude of casual cruelty, like this one.
These videos should have WAY more views, so the public can see how dirty and corrupt law enforcement can be
I am quite certain that this is a repost.
Take ALL tickets to court
The injustice is this woman experienced is frightening. What is going on? Are these police just not trained? I hope she sues. When did we lose our rights? She was taken advantage of because they thought no one would care. Thank you for making a difference. I’m confident you won this case! God bless!😊❤🙏🏻
They learn that if they are sued, it won't come out of their pockets, so they don't have to care about people's rights.
They're trained by government. Every so many years it gets worse. And they are thought to obey orders. I wish they would wake up. They are not taught to help citizens and protect citizens rights.
Basically the reason why we had a police force to start with is to protect people. Instead They are taught that we are all out to harm them and it is them against us. Which we don't want to harm them. But they're being told we do. Why I is that ???
Out of 100,000 stops throughout the day how many times does a police officer get hurt? It should not be them against us, it should be all of us against government, and they're out there to protect all of us from overreach. They do not see that they are ponds at this point. Ponds are something you can sacrifice for the good of the higher-ups. . And these officers are nothing more than a human that they can sacrifice when things get rough. I hope one day they will wake up.
So Basically the prosecution went to trial for no reason? Fantastic.
Tax payer money, they don’t care. They want that tax funded lifestyle
The not showing the defendant the results of the PBT is enough to cast reasonable doubt. As there's reasonable doubt the officer lied under oath.
And with her vomiting a short time before the PBT, that could have resulted in an abnormally high reading. For the same reasons a PBT just after drinking will give a false high reading.
That's my DUIGUY! TEAM WTH!
So how was the case resolved? Details please.
Right? He never ends with the verdict Which is the most important part
I bet the cop didn’t show her the breathalyzer results because he’s a liar and that proved her innocence. Wouldn’t the results be in the discovery?
Certainly should be! Ugh.
The results of the PBT are inadmissible in court in this case so that's why it wasn't entered
No result the field result is not admissible in court so it is not recorded.
Inadmissible as evidence, but may be used as probable cause for an arrest. No reason to take it at the roadside or do their other stupid field sobriety tests. They will find reasons to fail you, not pass you. Gotta get that MADD money.
@@markbrown8097 Yep... can't be used as evidence to convict, however can be exculpatory as well as show no PC for arrest. If field test is 0.06+, definitely PC to take to station and try to get blood/breath for a confirmatory test. If PBT is 0.02... no F-ing PC no way.
Where are the videos of the Jury Verdicts of these videos?
The officer showed the breatherlizer before to show he wasn't cheating did he refuses to show it after because he was?
I hate to bring it up, but I CANTON help it. We the MASSes have found ourselves KAREN way too much about a specific trial lately. READ between the lines Larry… 😂
Why would the prosecutor not cross examine the defendent?!?
Because they aren't worried about truth just a conviction
Because if they would’ve questioned her, they would’ve looked like assholes. She was a very sympathetic witness and Toomy. She was telling the absolute truth of what happened that night.
wish I could hear the jury delibeate.... because I'm certain that someone in there has gotten sick after eating something disagreeable, someone has had their GPS do that to them with split highways and roads, and I'm very certain that someone has not had access to their phone when it mattered most.
What were the results??
Case details please..
Is it common for KY DAs to bring cases to trial when they have no evidence? This isn’t the first such thats been shown on the channel.
She didnt do A SHOT, she did more than 2 shots of tequillia.
Back in the day, the city of Newport was nicknamed “Sin City”. It seems things have not changed much since prohibition.
Don't you think you should censor her address? Yeah it's public record, but it's the internet...
Are a lot of these officers given Awards and money for getting the most DUI's from MMAD?
Haven’t seen any Karen court case ;(
Double spoke there, sorry!!
I hope this court will someday invest in better video equipment!
Wth what’s the verdict??
Do these criminal clowns get bonuses for the amount of dui they get makes you wonder
She lied about the vomit. She lied about dropping off a work colleague. Her ability to follow the road rules are in question. And she refused the breath test at the station which would've proven either way. I'm not saying she is guilty but if i was on the jury i would have concerns about her honesty.
It's down to the threshold required for finding her guilty. Which is "beyond all reasonable doubt".
There is clearly reasonable doubt as to whether she was DUI. Therefore the verdict must be not guilty.
Telling lies is never a reason - on its' own - to find someone guilty beyond all reasonable doubt.
This does mean that there are times when people get away with crimes. But that's better than having a system where too many innocent people get convicted.
Never speak
Should have bleeped out the bit where she gave her address. Please protect your clients' privacy. Especially when it serves no purpose to broadcast personal details.
This is public information and on record…
@@Spawn303 No need nor benefit to broadcast this particular "public information" on a growing youtube channel.
@@Spawn303I guess ppl that care. Like her an nice little stalkers
@@jborrego2406 If they care enough to stalk then they probably care enough to look at public records
Ummmmm what about Karen Read??? 😢😢😢 I know all cases need attention. Dont get me wrong. But I’m left hangin 💔 hope you are feeling better
yes there was some important testimony today about blood alcohol levels from the med. exam that I thought Larry would comment on.
Those of us within the "DUI GUY SUBSCRIBER SILENT MAJORITY" absolutely Love you for this comment!!! 😂😂😂... This Guy gets us hooked on that good "Karen Read" Cr@ck and now is selling us non-descript wêëd... 😂... We need some more Albert, McCabe & Read debauchery... Yes, I could watch the trial myself but it's not the same without having the DUI GUY perspective "Play By Play"... 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I hope this isn't against lawtube rules but @collierlandry is doing a live in a few mins if you need a KR fix. It's to review the ME testimony today. 🤘
I’ve been wondering myself.
It’s seems at least a week with nothing. I love his channel.
@@commoncavecricket THANK YOU...
I have a question... when you were questioning your client, would you have gotten in trouble with the court had you said something like: so the officer showed you at the beginning that the device showed triple zeroes and he said so you know I'm not cheating, correct?
She says yes.
Then you say:
Do you think it would it be safe to assume he was doing his best to show you he was being fair with you?
We'll assume she would answer yes
Then you continue
But after the test the officer refused to show you the results, correct?
Again she says yes.
Then you scratch your chin for a moment like you're thinking and say
Interesting...
Prosecutor objects, you withdraw that last bit, but the jury hears it and that gets them to really focus on the pbt and ask themselves why wouldn't he just show her. Especially since he later says it showed the presence of alcohol
Would you doing that bit of theatrics get you into any kind of trouble with the court?
I have my own PBT and I have tried different tests at .08, .15, and.20 with myself and other individuals during house parties. There is NO WAY at .165 she was reciting D thru Q and counting backwards with no mistakes (even though she went past 58). Also, walk and turn without losing balance (AND walking backward (perfectly). Lastly, there was no slurred speech. This provides reasonable doubt multiple ways that she was not under the influence, and secondly the credibility of the LEO calling out .165 (twice the legal limit) in court. PBT's are inadmissible, but they are pretty damn close to the expected result from a breathalyzer. Interested to hear what the jury heard in the next episode. Based on previous videos. jury's can pick out one thing, get laser focused, and convict over the silliest of things.
Don’t rumble with the B 🐝
@theduiguy+ where is the full trial?
Sorry but I flat out don't believe she only had one shot. The shift ended at 1130, but she didn't leave till 230. As a server for 15yrs, I know for a fact that only reason you hang out after your shift is to have a drink.
I don't care how many shots she had! They should not be policing citizens. That is not what we gave them a job for. They were supposed to go after bad guys. They were never supposed to pull people over, stop them, ask for their papers, and if they did not obey throw them in jail. That is not why they are there to start with.