Mass Effect 3 Legendary Edition vs Original Graphics Comparison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 сен 2024
- Mass Effect 3 Legendary Edition vs Original Graphics Comparison
Many thanks to my friend Faisal from FA Gamez channel for capturing this gameplay!
Mass Effect Legendsry Edition was captured on PS5 meanwhile Original was captured on Xbox Series X.
Looking for gift cards?
PSN: amzn.to/3eFkAjM
Xbox: amzn.to/3gzvsl8
Nintendo eShop: amzn.to/2TRMbqf
Looking for RTX Graphics Cards? Check on Amazon: amzn.to/3dzcGYZ
Follow me on Twitter: / cyckiewicz
Find me on Facebook: / cycu1yt
Cycu1's friends:
Jabcook:
/ jabcook
Easy Unboxing:
/ @easyunboxing
Quick Expert Reviews
/ @quickexpertreviews
FA Gamez:
/ mrxboxgamer007
#MassEffectLegendaryEdition #PS5 #PS4 #XboxSeriesX #PS3 #Xbox360
It's nice, contrast has been adjusted to prevent black crushing, some textures have been revised, characters have a more redish skintone that makes them look less dead, blood textures on the cinematic have been significantly reduced (I don't mind, some where out of place), fire is more detailed and has more animation frames, and a few other details on some effects and shaders have been tweaked.
that is an understatement. obviously the effect of remastering isnt as grand as in me1 where they basically took it from 2008 to 2015 graphics wise, but the entire game is much more crisp, smoother, it even looks like they changed the streaming process for the lod a little. the anti aliasing has also been massively improved. i read through the list of what they did for the games, and it was a lot longer than just different lighting and upscaled textures.
@@jenshep1720 Everything you mentioned is explained by the different screeen resolution, nothing to do with the game resources themselves, but rather the capabilitites of the new platform
@@YOEL_44 thats not how videogames work my dude. you cant jsut slap a higher resolution on there and expect every singel graphical feature to be improved in this way. antialiasing for example would not be any better, the jagged edges would simply be that much clearer because theyre not being blurred anymore. in that specific case, a higher resoluton would actually make it worse. i recommend you actually look at the list of what they did before trying to rip it.
@@jenshep1720 Well that's exactly how they work, you don't want your features, your effects to work in a very specific, closed way, you want them to scale with the settings, aliasing on the other hand is super anoying and visible in low resolution cause pixels are big massive blobs all acoss the screen, if you scale up resolution you increase pixel density wich makes exacly what antialiasing does wich is hide individual pixels and the jagged edges that this cause.
@@jenshep1720 ikr like I always thought Shephard's outfit in this sequence looked really janky and low-resolution, whereas now it actually looks like something a person would wear rather than blue smudge
I literally just received my copy of this, the launcher is awesome! I don't think these demos do it justice - you have to see it in person.
For real! Playing it for the first time on my Xbox Series X with a 65" LG CX.
I am so glad to experience this game with my current setup in comparison to the original.
So true!!! It’s looks so crisp !!!
I agree wayy better in person. its cause youtube videos are condensed or whatever
You really do. Aliens especially look incredible in all the games
The launcher is actually the worst part of this, on PC at least, you open the launcher which then opens the game as a new application smh
I'm out here watching all these comparisons like I didn't just get this game 😂😂
Same. We are just making ourselves feel better about our purchase.
I like Ashley being a darker brunette but definitely can see the improvements across the board, which is to be expected I guess. I want to see it in gameplay tho, as that's where most of our time will be spent.
The raven dark hair was definitely more attractive but most females tend to shy away from that. Which is who most likely added to the redesign choice. Looks good all around though.
Nice! Loving the framerate improvements not to mention lighting and textures. Shepard's armor alone is such an improvement.
try playing on the PC, every game is "remastered"
ikr! his outfit in this sequence always looked really off to me, especially with the weirdly harsh lighting of the original, but now it looks solid!
@@robosergTV I do play on pc... exclusively now actually. Been this way since 2013
@@Kevin-jo5zf Then I dont understand your point about "frame rate improvements". Was the FPS capped in ME1?
@@robosergTV Well seeing as the game is being released on all platforms and clearly the above comparison at least the the original footage is from a console. Meaning you can clearly see the framerate improvements. Also all the footage of the video I am commenting on is ME3 to begin with.
This is like jumping on a video comparing A 2011 Civic with a 2016 Civic and going but the Nissan Sentra.
It's funny how when the scenes are moving they don't LOOK all that different, except the new one is more pleasing. But when you pause it, you can see a massive difference and you're like "Oh THAT'S why the new one feels better to look at"
And the lighting is infinitely better.
Nice. Anderson looks amazing. I did actually prefer the slightly desaturated look though.
There is always the option to set the saturation on the TV set I guess.
I didn't think ME3 would have much of an upgrade compared to the others. But that is actually quite substantial. Way better textures and resolution of said textures.
ME3 looks & feels shit compared to ME2! Wtf
@@Ciki92 what?why?
@@gamersforlife3440 idk man, i really preferred 2 over 3. 3's combat, sprinting just didnt feel good, they didnt update much about 3 in definitive edition
@@Ciki92it's not a remake after all but i agree with your statement. Mass Effect 3 sprinting animation is quite weird and for LE they just gave all the attention to LE1 and leave LE2 nor LE3 with just some low effort re-texture and broken lighting
1. The improvements are pretty great even for the third game.
2..The third games graphics in the original are still so much better than the majority of AAA games that come out today
well when you have 8 bit roblocks and shit for phones honestly what do you expect
Higher res textures and softer shadows, cheap as fuck.
don't forget brand new 3D models, bug fixes, and hardware optimization
@@TheLoneWolf449 stop commenting every peoples opinion edgy kid, this is their personal opinion and I and more others agree with them.
@@OLYMPIANgreek When you quit complaining about every single thing while ignoring other facts, then I'll bug off
pretty much, i mean this was what we saw in the trailers so technically they didnt lie. Still, its a shame. As a package, only ME1 had any significant upgrade, and even then, all 3 games still look extremely dated. Facial expressions still look off, and the most insulting part is there are STILL a ton of really bad textures lol. Like the one fucking this the remaster was supposed to do, and its a letdown.
The foilage and textures still look bad. A very half-assed remaster. Ground textures in video games that came out in 2012 look far better than how they look in this game. This is just a slight visual upgrade over the original. Look at saints row 3 remastered. That game looks so detailed that it looks like a modern game almost. That is how remasters are supposed to be done. The game has horrible looking ugly textures.
The reapers are kind. They could have leveled that city instantly no questions asked. Why didn't they?
And besides they have limited forces if their trying to harvest the entire solar system bringing all that fire power to earth wouldn't by very strategically for them
Because it’s Canada and Canadians are nice, even the reapers show them a bit of mercy
The start of the game until the Palaven missions was so amazing... Look at the cutscenes, the direction, the camere work, the quality the care for the cutscenes etc...after that you can see the rush the development team had...
But still one of the best franchises ever, too bad the ending could not deliver.
I thought palaven was nice but short, the game had alot of great moments I just think the last 15 minutes where just pulled out of nowhere, crazy they made the game in 2 year aswell
Overall it's a great game, it has many great moments. It's just the ending that shits on everything amazing before.
@@BigBoss-ty7tv many such cases
The ending delivered with extended cut. The ending was amazing actually but sadly so few truly understood it.
N.m.mpnmp😅😊😊😅😊😅 9:12 9:12 😅@@IINareik
The eyes in the LE look WAY too glossy. Its honestly creepy looking.
Yea they put an ugly bandaid on remaster
lol i though i wasnt the only one hopefully they patch it later on
Nah it's fine
Yeah they ended up in uncanny valley and eyes looked better in original
I really hoped they fixed running animations...
Original ME3 - you can see the distant buildings in detail
Legendary Edition ME3 - a black shape that looks like a possible building somewhere in the distance
Seriously ? LMAO !!!
Well, you know, when there is fog involved is hard to see the buildings on the distance...
@@AnsweredElk113 check the video carefully, the buildings in the background are literally a black colored shape in the Legendary Edition, with the same amount of fog/smoke etc that it's shown in the original one
I don't care what anyone says, Mass Effect 3 is my favorite Mass Effect (synthesis being an option aside)
Original lighting is better, why is it so bright in legendary?
no its called more natural lighting. the lighting in the original suffers from alot of black crush.
nah, legendary is better. all of the highlights are blown out and the blacks crushed are in the original.
I think legendary does look better, but there’s something about it that makes me feel like 2 just looked better. Idk what it is, I love all 3 games though. 2 is definitely the more “dark and underground” vibe I liked tho
...It's almost like a remaster is not the same as a remake! Who knew!??? Seriously, they're still limited by the old engine's capabilities. An engine that is almost 17 years old I might add. For any substantial changes they'd have to change engines and rework the whole game from the ground up. For three games. That are all around 40 + hours long. By the time they finished it we'd be on the next gen of consoles already. It would take so long. Not to mention if they could even get the same battle systems to work on a new engine, and even if they did go the remake route and had to change things because of technical issues fans would still be out here complaining that it's 'not enough' or that they changed too much. And yet people are out here acting like Bioware is holding people at gun point to buy it which is definitely not the case.
In my opinion. It looks good. Is it what I was hoping for? No. But I understand the limitations they were saddled with. It took three and a half years to make ME1. Two years for 2. Just those two, on their own, with old tech is almost 6 years development. Starting from scratch on new gen tech you'd expect even longer development for just those two alone. We'd be looking at almost another decade before we saw a remake. Practically it makes more sense to just remaster and make another sequel which seems to be what they were shooting for.
Am i the only one who thinks the lighting looks flat in the new version? Like it was specifically made for the original and doesn't gel well with the new version.
YES! Terrible lighting. All these "changes" can be found for free on nexus mods.
@@gdc4736 go play it with those then EA doesn't have a gun to your head demanding you buy it.
@gdc4736 fals
Efficient work with all these videos dude!
Finally, they add proper armor and cloth textures. The original was horrible, even at 2012. Now I can even read shepard or Anderson number!
The shadows aren't as good
Now all ME3:LE needs is multi-player again
they might say something about that at EA play which is next month I think? or the next month after that. my brain no worky right now
@@zulicurah9414 I read that they want to see how well the game sells and how big the demand for multi-player is, meaning people need to be telling Bioware to add multi-player
@@zulicurah9414 agreed. Keep an eye on EA Play! Also, if multiplayer comes back, they should expand and build upon it, maybe Battle Royale?
@@slimanMatt10 not everything must be br eh
they could use the the arena games of me universe(like the one from citadel dlc) to do a pvp or simply a simil l4d
I really do love that lighting.
Me too
So if you are a pc owner of the original trilogy its only worth it for ME1. 2 and 3 are pretty much the same games
at its core, its fixing 1 and 3 ending, they even said they spend the most work on ME1. which is normal, consider its made over 15 years ago with engine and coding dated back to early 2000.
They need a real remastered version with path tracing and so on. I dont care if I have to pay another 60 euros for it. Just make it a next next gen remaster.
Always thought that it was my pc not loading up textures right with classic ME3 back then i had a 1050 now realizing nah they were just naturally muddy, the textures itself is a massive improvement cause most of the time the camera is up close to the characters, btw try Expanded Galaxy mods, game now feels packed with more codex entries and lore, also a bonus andromeda mission
Can u do comparison of mass effect before patch and day one patch
Visually looks pretty much the same. Some parts look strangely worse. like Shepard's armor looks less battle worn or the lighting and shadows in conversations.
Not much of a step up for ME2 and ME3, but generally MOST textures look better. But eh, not rly worth worth price at this point since i already have the PC originals.
I wish theyd done a bit more
So, again, we cannot holster our weapon in ME3? Good job!
Why would you want to ???
Considering the only time you have your weapon out is when you're on combat missions, I dont think that was ever a problem?
@@jxckedgell3821 because I could do that in ME1 and ME2 using one button. Because the inability to do that breaks the immersion - nobody runs like like that in real life and, here, Shepard looks like a moving manequin. Because you can holster, or at least lower your gun in any 3rd person shooter since 1st Gears of War (2006), which gives you better vision of what's going on on the screen and speeds up the camera a lot. Fans of the the PC version of ME3 have created a mod that fixes that; hhousands of people used it and, still, apparently, nobody at EA/Bioware gave a rat's ass about it, despite the fact it's the 3rd and technologically most advanced installment that just should have it...
@@bluegoose7832 no, it's not a problem. However it breaks the immersion and it's a remaster that should fix things that people have fixed on their own, in mods in the PC version of the game. The rest looks fantastic, and I can't wait to play it. :)
What a disapointment. I loved looking at my character with my cool looking armors against the backdrop of any location I was visiting. And it sucks we can't do that in ME3 because you're constantly in a pointing at everything stance.
I'm actually kind of glad they went with more subtle changes instead of massive changes. I especially like the material changes to Shepards uniform in this scene, the original always bugged me because of how awful it looked.
Now i need to wait 3 or 4 years to buy it for 10€. Thanks EA.
Fitgirl is ready!
@@madiimad fellow fitgirl gamer
should have used the original PC version. just to see if the difference is still as big
The start of mass effect 2 and 3 are so freaking good...
my only issue is that mods have to be ported over as well. Expanded Galaxy for ME3 is a must for PC.
They still should have altered the ending, which was such a letdown. Otherwise, as good looking as it is, it's still just a mod.
Is it just me or are the graphics more stiff now? Shep just seems like he got a lot of Botox.
It looks like you upgraded from a bad monitor to a mid range one :D
I can hardly see a difference
Same
An ophthalmologist will help you...
You need glasses and you're colorblind.
@@eneak2518 I have glasses 😑
@@kellerblair2952 So buy better one :D
60 fps and high resolution is nice for console players but I really don't see a point in getting this on pc for full price.
Lol, its dramatically improved on PC. It had horrid optimization on PC before, and you can't even use mods as an excuse to stay original. Mods didn't add new models, nor did they fix bugs, and overhaul combat in ME1. I bought it in a heartbeat when I learned it would play better on new hardware. I played the original modded on a 5950X with 6900XT and the frames would take freqent dips and have stutters at times because it couldn't fully utilize my hardware. $20 a game including all DLC in one package, I don't even question the value. Its super worth it in my eyes. I'd have payed $40 a game if they'd broken them all up.
@@TheLoneWolf449 The foilage and textures still look bad. A very half-assed remaster. Ground textures in video games that came out in 2012 look far better than how they look in this game. This is just a slight visual upgrade over the original. Look at saints row 3 remastered. That game looks so detailed that it looks like a modern game almost. That is how remasters are supposed to be done. The game has horrible looking ugly textures.
@we'll bang, okay I don't even think you read what I said. The original had horrid optimization on new hardware. I have played with mods and they caused microstutters and frame drops on a $4000 PC. That doesn't happen in the remaster. And on top of that, mods only texture this game. Textures help a little, but the models look like shit too, and no mod fixes that. The remaster has mods. On top of that, I play on Ultra wide which the old game doesn't support meaning I can't even utilize my full monitor in terms of refresh rate or aspect ratio. This remaster also fixed the stupid weapon system in Mass Effect one in which you couldn't properly utilize weapons outside your class. If you were a vanguard you couldn't look through the scope of your rifle. Once again, the remaster allows that. Also they removed the retarded requirement to play multiplayer in order to gain galactic readiness in single player. They also made it possible to hit the level cap in one playthrough, before, you had to play a single game 2-3 times to hit max level. There are plenty of reasons to buy this remaster. Just because you are cheap, doesn't mean the rest of us are. And the sales of this game have proved that.
@@TheLoneWolf449 Using a 5950x for gaming is a waste of money, you'd also have better performance in older games if you instead bought a CPU with higher per core clock speed instead of a CPU with more cores since older games, and still many newer games, use less than 8 cores.
Also the way you say 'horrid optimization on newer hardware'... the game wasn't optimized at all for newer hardware as it came out over a decade ago, the game was built for the at the time 'next gen' dual core CPU's, UE3 was known to have many issues using more then a single CPU core which is why many people manually set mass effect to run on a single core, because it actually improved stability.
@@SekiberiusWelkesh Obviously I know it wasn't meant for my hardware, but the remaster is, hence why its worth it to me. And btw you are wrong. I switched to a 5950X from a 5800X and despite the fact that it has a ever so slightly lower clock. I gained 10-20 FPS in virtually every game I play. That may not seem like a huge uplift to you, but if I have the money, why not go for the best possible hardware. Not gonna put anyone else down for not putting the money that I have into my system though. Truthfully I bought what I bought for my PC, because I wanted to have the best something. To me it feels good to know that I work for and built my system. and PC gaming is my cheapest hobby. Guns and Cars are way more expensive.
textures reaper is identical... lazy work
I can see the appeal on consoles but on PC there’s barely a difference, imo
I really wish that the Legendary Edition removed Ashley's unnecessary redesign in this game and brought back her ME1 and 2 design.
All I wanted was for them to fix the ending. Instead of shitty still pictures...animate the damn thing!
ending was perfect you piece of elcor
@@marcraider No, it wasn't. But you can be wrong, it's ok. I'm just a fan that expects more from a franchise that he loves. I don't just swallow whatever is shoved down my throat.
they fixed already the ending with the extended cut deal with it, it's already been 9 years grow up(and no the missing happy ending it's not a problem)
2:47
Just look at the costumes, in the remaster they look like plastic
Did the upgrade Shepard's smile? Or is it still the same meme? Lolj
I’m going to ask Capcom to teach EA how to make a remaster
What remaster have they done?
@@TheAustin007powers i really hope he don't Say RE2-3
4HD was basic af
@@Syndicated1227 if that's what he means it makes no sense. 2 and 3 were remakes not remasters.
With Resi 1 remake, yeah, Resi 2 - meh....Just don't ask them to instruct how to make a sequel - Resi 8...ouch.
More like bluepoint :)
The new character is absolutely hilarious the graphics are awesome the new missions are awesome this is how you upgrade a game Rockstar needs to take some advice from these guys when it comes to upgrading games or remastering
O ile pierwsza część przeszła sporo zmian, to dwójka i trójka praktycznie nieruszone
on 4k res this game is a real gamechanger; pun intended
ME1 seems to be the only justification for buying the remake, but not at that price. At least on pc, since there's texture mods that make 2 and 3 look very close to this footage.
looks like they spent all their time remastering the first and left the other two the same kinda seems like a sick joke if you ask me
if nothing substantial changed does it really classify as a remaster or is it like dressing up a pig
If on PC, instead of this I would recommend modding the original version with ALOT, ALOV and the Expanded Galaxy Mod (inculding most of the recommended mods listed on there). You can find all of them on Nexus Mods. That is a MUCH better experience, than the "original" just slightly better graphics. Thank me later.
An example of what EGM does, when the reapers attack on Earth, Harbinger is the reaper that Shepard looks at after the explosion, not just some generic Reaper in the original and legendary versions. Harbinger is missing throughout the entire game, and only shows up at the end as a deus ex machina in the original, but this mod adds it here, so the veteran players know exactly who they're dealing with...
This mod fixes a lot of these nonsensical writing, but mostly world building issues. The story is still the same, but it adds SOOOO much flavor to it, you'll enjoy it more.
The angles and sharp edges on everyone's face is really jarring. They could have at least remodeled the faces.
Femshep still uses Maleshep's facial, cutscene and combat animations and her model is still using his skeleton rig, giving her an elongated neck and really ridiculous animations in general.
Smearing the screen with lens flares and simulated lens dirt looks really cheap. Dunno why they added that to ME2 and ME3.
Textures are better and reworked lighting really highlights that, but it ain't worth $60 if you're played it before.
Ashley with black hair seems fit. Brown doesn't work for me. What's with people changing the hair color. I'll never get that. Some NPC's also got their black to brown hair. Some others not. Also readheads went to brown. What's with the brown hair?
While you can improve the framerate in the original by using Notepad++, the Legendary edition does it without impairing the game mechanics.
Lazy remaster, not buying, EA should have worked on a proper UE4 port not this cash grab.
ah yes, the blue filter ... makes everything ''look better'' but no, it's just to trick the eye (: 8:25 I should have known they will add this crap
I honestly think these look worse overall, they have no soul to them. Yeah textures are way nicer but the lighting is hit and miss, often flatter, brighter and just plain worse.
It does look better, but they should've done more.
@@danat4914 I actually took a punt on this after I saw Fextralife preview and I have to admit it looks a lot better in action so I am definitely retracting my previous comment.
I agree with you more probably should have been done given the size of the franchise and the publisher involved but at least they put a bit more work in on the original.
Are you sure both games are on pc on highest settings for similar resolution? Coz the og one looks like it's captured on Xbox 360 or something...
Admiral Hackett lost one of his shoulder straps wtf? In original he have four straps in each shoulder! They say he demoted because of sexual assault is that true?
9 years later and it still doesn't even look 2014 or 2016. I expected more bioware.
Better lighting, graphics, & textures. Garbage.
Bioware really outdid themselves. As a huge Mass Effect Fan I wasnt ready for what they delivered with this. 10 outta 10. Only wish they included multiplayer for 3 as it was actually super fun. Seeing that in 4K 60 would of been something.
I think they messed up the lighting a little bit. The original felt more dramatic the new one looks less exposed and softened ergo less dramatic
Nah it's fine
Should have remade them. Im sure the cast was more than willing.
cast was e a wasn't
Ok wait what my mass effect 3 looks baked as fuck
$60 for legendary edition 😳 I'll keep playing mass effect 3 on game pass for free lol
gives 1,2,3 with all dlc included for every game
iv seen first game which looks extremly better than original version
Thanks so much for this!
Honestly, I don't see much difference. Does anyone else? I mean, minimal differences.
Totally. Don't worth the release price in my opinion.
thought my eyesight was poor apparently my sight is fine e a are crooks
I used the technology to upgrade the technology to show the technology using technology to destroy the technology
Most of the time, it just looks like they turned bloom off
Honestly, not worth it!
@@TheLoneWolf449 Excuse me Sir. Are you feeling ok Randy?
I agree. It looked fishy in the trailers, but seeing it in final... Yikes.
@@TheLoneWolf449 people are buying it for ME and possibly ME2 remasters, not this trash.
@@danat4914 I definitely bought it for all three. The 3rd is my favorite. And IMO it really didn't need anything beyond textures and maybe models. And honestly, I like that all 3 games now look unified
@we'll bang, okay I don't know why folks have to be so pessimistic
Damn they did a great work
Absolutly no differences😄
change color scheme upscale to 4k and you may ask 60€
atleast they improved and not make cartoony like they did with GTA trilogy which looks much worse than original
Czy da radę zmieniać dubbing z poziomu gry? Czy trzeba kombinować z regionami przed instalacją?
Na ppe.pl zdaje się wrzucili artykuł o tym. Odsyłam tam. Bo szczerze powiem, że nie wiem, jak wygląda ta kwestia.
Nie ma dubbingu w 3
Not like in 1080p we can notice so much difference...
If they're gonna charge full price for an already developed game then it should've looked WAY better than what they're trying to sell. I'd rather just play the original and this is coming from someone who's played all 3 games multiple times and has bought it for multiple platforms to support the game. They just wanted to make more money and basically scammed people with few increased framrate and 15% improvement in texture lol. When it gets down to $10 is when I'll buy it but as of right now- no thanks!
They didn't fixed terrible ME3 running animations.
Honestly, expected A LOT MORE changes for THAT price, like you know, REAL FIXES. Maybe even story tweaks, who knows?
no remastered fix the animations gameplay(and then for me3 they could simply add the speed of the drell) even gears of war ultimate edition use the same animations from 2006
Uhh. There's no black shadows, why? Even in dark you see everything and it makes everything look plasticy. That's not how shadows work. Even the original did it better.
Yeah textures sure look good but every remaster they forget about shaders. SMH
they think remastering means brighter less shadow
Nexus Mods and A Lot Of Textures do the same for free.
ME 2 and 3 sure, but legendary edition r focusing on 1. which nexus mods can never fix, 2 and 3 dont even need mods. I can still play them with out needing hd remake fine. 1 hell no
I think it's hilarious that people have convinced themselves that this is worth 60$
Part 1 is, this is just icing on the cake.
@@thebalderthor4884 If you already own all the previous titles it's such a huge waste of resources just to support a game company that no longer gives a shit about their customers.
I'm not sure whick one is better.
remastered ME3 looks better,then 2 park
The frame rate in the cutscenes being lower is on purpose though. It simulates the look of film, which is 24fps. Imo, they should've made that an option.
Are you sure? Pretty sure the original trilogy was just horribly optimised on consoles.
I think its because theyre pre rendered
@@Tyranniod Yeah, the PC version had cutscenes run at 30. Again, this is deliberate. A lot of games have done this. I mean whatever, most people would probably want higher frames during cutscenes, but I like the film look of it.
I can tell a lot of work has been put into these 3 games improving where is needed but, it's just a shame that the team treats their consumers like children and had to go and censor parts of the game, camera angles and other things like dialogue must've been offensive, The ESRB rating says 18+. Shame the original team is long gone from Bioware and it shows big time.
Oh please, just shut up
Miranda's ass shots were literally conflicting with what she was saying. She was talking about her abusive relationship with her father and the camera was fixed on her ass. There's no censorship here... her ass is still there, the camera just isn't on it
The ESRB rating being 18 isn't anything special either. It's not censorship, it's a rating that the majority of people ignore anyway...
If you REALLY care about the ass shots, either play the original, wait for modders to add them back in, or look up "Miranda's ass" on google images and have your cry wank 🤣
@@bluegoose7832 it's not ass shots, it's the clear fact that those petty simple things were such a big focus. Clearly it was a bigger deal then it had to be. I am enjoying how butthurt you are over me talking about SJW scum 🤣
I agree with you completely, and blue goose don't be gay! Lol
wait. its the first time I hear about dialogue being changed. Do you have more informations? Like, specifically what dialogue was changed?
the graphics are nice yeah BUT DID THEY CHANGE THAT TALI PHOTO????
They did!
IMPERCEPTÍVEL
lol color corection and texture pack? what a joke but i knew it will be like that
ME3 doesn't really need any other improvements though...
Look at ME1 if you want to see more than just visual improvements.
@@bluegoose7832 doesen't need? hell no I would change a lot more, like more life like animations, moving animations, facial animations, lip movements in gameplay and dialogs, more polygons in MELE no polygon improvements, and f@ck these high-resolution textures, these are basically the same so I would add photorealistic textures and much better lighting, they changed it in ME1 but a little bit and ME2 and 3 looks like they been untouched, they did very little job and changing 60$ for that F@ck BioWare,I knew it will be disappointment
@@findalpup and if you think ME3 looks like it's been untouched with it's visuals.... then I dont know what else to say other than get some glasses? Or make sure the video quality is high so you can see....
@@bluegoose7832 yeah the improved textures and anti aliasing were immediately noticable to me
@@SwungCookie where
This game is way better than last of us 1 vs 2 the best game I ever played, the problem is this game is old.
waiting for it to be on EA play so i can play it through my game pass ultimate subscription. not buying something like this that should have atleast been a full remake of the first and not just a little touch up on controls etc.
You're probably going to be waiting a long time. At least a year.
@@yokiryuchan7655 8 months.
fITGirl is ready!
Not a very big difference in this one, but that's to be expected being the newest one. Probably didn't put as much effort as the first two.
Let's just say it... Original Mass Effect still hold up graphically^^
nah, it doesn't. If you want to seen old games with impressive visuals, look at Battlefield 3. Add a 4k texture pack to it and the game would look better than some modern major titles. Same with Crysis 3, but the optimization in that one just sucks.
Nothing holding up better than a giant blurry mess of blob textures
Dobra robota, ale i tak kocham wygląd trójeczki na starego dobrego Xklocka 360. 😏
The fans at Nexus made a far better remaster and not just graphically but also story wise. If anyone wants to know more, feel free to reply.
as I expected, ME1 got the most of the enhancement, it's almost another game at this point (in the graphic part).
ME2 got better textures and lighting, but it's not as much of a surprise as it is in ME1.
And difference in ME3 are neglectable to unnoticeable. For the most noticable part, it's pretty much better resolution and that it.
The biggest question for me is: gameplay?
Honestly, for having done 3 full run + multiple run of ME3 only, I can say that the 2 first ME got a class balance problem. There was the soldier and the rest. It's not unplayable, but soldier was OP while the other class were not as potent and even a bit boring to play (I remember that the biotic was a bit boring/defensive oriented).
They made effort in ME2 with biotic/tech introduction and perfect it in ME3. I hope they apply the ME3 balance to the 2 other games, and the gameplay too btw.
Mass effect 3 looks ugly and dark it always looked the worst out of the 3
either you aren't watching this at a good resolution, or your eyes are bad. The 3D models look better, textures are way more detailed and not overly contrasting and saturated, frame rates are significantly better, and that's more than enough for me
@@TheLoneWolf449 frame rate and textures? really? And contrast is even adjustable on TV settings.
Remaster of the 3 is the most boring and laziest remaster ever. Sure, it doesn't make the game worse, but they could've fixed and/or changed a lot of things, like animations and scenery.
And the thing is that this remaster looks outdated. Just look at 2:36 . Now I wish they never showed up Shepard's close-up face.
@@danat4914 it's a remaster, not a remake. I'm more than satisfied for the simple reason that it's actually able to utilize my hardware. I have a $4000 PC, and in the original I'm locked to 62 FPS with terrible utilization. With mods frames would dip and stutter without even utilizing my hardware. They fixed the bugs, optimized it, and gave it a fresh coat of paint. That's all it needed. It didn't need new animations, this, and that. It was brought back for it's nostalgia. And for a majority of the fanbase they would have only risked destroying what millions of players have come to love. Why don't you try enjoying something for once, instead of spending all your time thinking about what something could be. And if you can't enjoy it, move on to something you can. It's a waste of your time and mine to sit around sobbing that something isn't what you wanted.
Why did his outfit go from battleworn, scratched up, and all around natural looking to fresh, clean, pristine? Don't like that change at all.
Because it's supposed to be a clean outfit?
Why would Shepard wear a scruffy looking outfit that looks like it belongs in the aftermath of a house fire?
Remember at this point he's been grounded and was stripped of his rank
@@bluegoose7832 I'll give you that. But if they don't change the texture after you just get done with an intense fight to a rugged looking one it's gonna be weird coming out of every fight with a clean af outfit.
Czy legendarna edycja nie ma polskiej wersji?
Hej. Są napisy zdaje się. Nie jestem pewien czy dubbing - ale raczej wątpię.
Przy okazji, wpadnij też na mó polski kanał - wrzucam tam treści w naszym ojczystym języku ;)
ruclips.net/channel/UCeo0ihxCI5lukrL4LlrxthA
Mass Effect 1 on Legendary looks amazing, Mass Effect 2 is so vividly detailed and the lighting and load times are unmatched-but Mass effect 3 on legendary just looks like they swapped out the face and armor details and gave it a slight contrast bump and called it a day. Absolutely disappointing for me as it was my first time playing the trilogy. To have 2 games of amazing graphics and detail and story building, and then having all of that thrown away in 3