Why China Is Increasingly Deciding the Outcome of the Ukraine War

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 62

  • @theglobalgambit
    @theglobalgambit  26 дней назад +3

    Thanks for watching. Be sure to drop a LIKE and consider subscribing to never miss more diverse, yet dynamic conversations. Missed part 1? Watch it HERE: ruclips.net/video/gZF2i95RtMg/видео.html

  • @FLEXFELD
    @FLEXFELD 25 дней назад +4

    those "western specialists" are such a joke

  • @barbaranostrand4214
    @barbaranostrand4214 25 дней назад +2

    The colonel is spouting nonsense. Pyotr Kurzin should have asked about the Russian response to the Ukrainian salient in Kursk in light of US military history in Kiska and Attu. As for industrial production, China currently occupies the international economic role that the US did in 1940. As for China, the US currently has a bug about China. India knows that it is next on the menu if the US takes down China. Dr. S. Jaishankar has been quite explicit about Indian neutrality with respect to the US proxy war in Ukraine.

  • @lwty
    @lwty 25 дней назад +2

    Ask where the drones and components of drones that Ukraine military uses come from

  • @fallonmassey4714
    @fallonmassey4714 25 дней назад +3

    *Spoken like a real European, LOL! You simply can't understand war, Russia doesn't measure success by territory, but by how many pieces that they take off the table, men & machines!*

  • @theglobalgambit
    @theglobalgambit  26 дней назад +5

    Is the West hypocritical over its war profiteering? Drop a comment.
    Have someone you want to hear from? Add their name and I'll get them on the show!

    • @polysporin8332
      @polysporin8332 26 дней назад

      USA is still buying uranium concentrate, and titanium from Russia. as well as many other things so the "war" against Russia is kind of bullocks. plus all the western capitalists and middlemen in central Asia selling/smuggling many of EU and American goods and products across Russian boarder.
      "bad guy, good guy" trope is just to sell products and goods at increased profits.

    • @God_emperor_Doom
      @God_emperor_Doom 26 дней назад +1

      Yes

    • @yofedstyhrega4594
      @yofedstyhrega4594 26 дней назад

      Yes you can't have your cake and eat it too.
      There is no benefit to it. The short-term gains dwarf the longterm losses other countries will see as unfair which is already happening. lot of the anti-west sentiment is a result of.

    • @InqGraves
      @InqGraves 26 дней назад

      No. And byebye.

    • @Swiplys
      @Swiplys 25 дней назад

      Absolutely 100% yes. We need to get out of Ukraine. It is not our fight and our people have told - if not demanded - that we end all foreign wars. We are literally creating the crises that trigger large scale displacement and immigration. At the same time we break the backs of our economies, businesses and workers. And for whose benefit?? Some weapons manufacturer?? End the madness

  • @georgekaradov1274
    @georgekaradov1274 26 дней назад +3

    There is nothing in Kursk. Just forest. Every inch taken I Dombas is precious industrial land, heavily fortified and full of mineral and industrial wealth. How exactly do the two compare... this military "expert" is nothing more than a propagandist...

    • @pavelhromadka658
      @pavelhromadka658 25 дней назад

      How exactly does the industrial land manifest? The russians are very thorough in destroying everything first by artillery, they also impress the male population into military service. So would it not probably be easier to build from the scratch somewhere else?

  • @GucciKraken
    @GucciKraken 26 дней назад

    Speak truth to power ❤

  • @Rockall57
    @Rockall57 26 дней назад

    If any country targeted any military equipment in the Chinese border heading to Russia would surely be an equivalent article 5 event..

    • @danwelterweight4137
      @danwelterweight4137 25 дней назад +1

      What military equipment. There is no military equipment going from China to Russia.

  • @robinirie98
    @robinirie98 26 дней назад

    Just this week Russia took towns in Ukraine. Ukraine took open land and one town. Not all sq km is equal

  • @billyk-fz5md
    @billyk-fz5md 2 дня назад

    I just don’t care Baeza Public, the people

  • @jeffreywang8506
    @jeffreywang8506 26 дней назад

    So the heck what?!

    • @theglobalgambit
      @theglobalgambit  26 дней назад

      So you care if the west is warmongering for Ukraine ? But not for China to Russia? Hypocrisy

    • @TonyVCetinski
      @TonyVCetinski 26 дней назад +2

      ​@@theglobalgambit😂😂 when the west talk about hypocrisy 😂😂

    • @rodneyagesa1851
      @rodneyagesa1851 25 дней назад +1

      ​@@theglobalgambitChina is always talking of peace and cease fire and not war mongering which is the preserve of the west.

    • @Swiplys
      @Swiplys 25 дней назад

      @@theglobalgambit Come on man, we've seen enough foreign wars that have basically been started by our nations every 5 years for the last 70 odd years. We need to end the madness that is our war mongering.
      The model that is obvious to most is the multipolar one. That once nations of the world reach technology and infrastructure parity, then balance of power comes from how many people are in each nation and the resources at its disposal. The eastern and Asian nations have pretty much reached that scale but to put it into perspective, the USA has about 300 million people, Europe has 400 million whereas Russia has about over 150 million people and China has 1400 million people. This is not even counting the rest of the Global South, the major ones who would absolutely love if the Global West and Global East went to a full zero-sum war so as to allow for the rise of new Global South superpowers and local major powers. So all in all, we are talking about tripwires that will lead into unimaginable warfare of a scale far worse than WW2 or even the proxy wars in the Cold War. At the time the Soviet Union was not an economy equivalent to modern China nor did it have the population. So this is a much different ball game, essentially we are fighting a nation (or confederation) that is the combined American and European population doubled and its proxies (ie Russia, nuclear North Korea, Iran with 80 million people) and others who fall into an anti-west or neutral policy. Every nation seems to be going nationalistic or regional unity nationalistic, harping on about the awful colonial pasts of western nations, which is perfect the perfect cultural discourse needed to boot out western powers. Take France for example

  • @pkwong1940
    @pkwong1940 26 дней назад +3

    What a load of crap!

    • @GregJ-ft5qk
      @GregJ-ft5qk 26 дней назад

      Delusional COPE ! These 2 are jokers

  • @fronabulax63
    @fronabulax63 26 дней назад +4

    always this Russia must lose fantasys...
    Russia is winning....

  • @rajivshah6128
    @rajivshah6128 26 дней назад +5

    Viva Russia!
    Viva China!

    • @SodiumSyndicate
      @SodiumSyndicate 25 дней назад +2

      Viva ONLY India, no one else Rajiv. Stop simping for other countries.

    • @rajivshah6128
      @rajivshah6128 25 дней назад +2

      @ if you were smart you would understand there can’t be an “only” if you want a viva India. 🙄

    • @SodiumSyndicate
      @SodiumSyndicate 25 дней назад

      @@rajivshah6128 If you had BALLS, you wouldn't be prostituting your loyalty to foreign countries.

    • @Swiplys
      @Swiplys 25 дней назад

      @@SodiumSyndicate Again as someone with Indian heritage, most Indians have historical hatred towards Europe and the child that is America. To ask Indians to take sides will just offend them to the point that they will basically make border deals with China and then help fund Russia to overcome NATO. The historical backlog is still there and that is probably the biggest mistake of Europe and the West

  • @martinsmith9054
    @martinsmith9054 12 дней назад

    Schrodinger's North Koreans. I have yet to see indisputible concrete evidence. It might be true I'm waiting for it. A few thousand extra troops would always come in handy. It would be more of a favor by Russia though to give NK troops real battle experience. But they could do that by observers, so I'm dubious we'll see much except Tuvans, Buryats or the Korean minority in Russia identified as North Koreans.