Great list and mine would not be too dissimilar! I agree with the CL650 position. One of, if not the most comprehensive packages you can get in any sim platform and I absolutely love it but its price puts it out of reach of a lot of people. Great work buddy!
Thanks for the video! It's great that you've also included the developper support in the criteria: it is about time that they got serious about it. Moreover, I am glad you got back into the content creation game after your break!
Very cool that you ranked the Q4XP first. I think it packs in so much realistic detail and that it's a great option for those who like doing short haul routes.
@@Q8Pilot I don't remember if you featured MU-2 on your channel? It is also a plane that is fantastically made and has that something about it ... I highly recommend it (I don't know if it is compatible with XP12 yet).
The IXEG is/was the greatest IMO Boeing one could buy. The only sour note to it is the developer's infrequent updates and when they do come it takes forever, in some cases years that as a customer is unacceptable. If the track record continues on the IXEG then the Xplane12 version might not be seen for ages. Shame because this is an awesome add-on and one of my favorites. I just can't forgive the support team and they need a big kick in the pants to get a move on.
@@JulesD92 They are flip-flopping again as usual. It was supposed to be out by March 8th, but now it's pushed back then they add that the FMC will still need to be worked on even after this next so-called update. The developer there is horrible and should be given the "How not to treat customers" award. Has been going on for years with IXEG. Don't you find it odd how a developer like Hot-Start with the Challenger 650, hands down probably the most complex of all Xplane aircraft has an update out and working great in a matter of a couple weeks and others cannot? No excuse for this type of behavior.
Very useful video, and thanks for taking the time to put generic labels in your description for the timestamps and hyperlinks so as not to spoil the surprise of your rankings. I had been considering getting the concorde, and I'd heard of people talking about the Challenger, so I will certainly consider those, when budget allows, due to your recommendation. I already have Q4XP. I only wish I had the time and budget to learn all of these aircraft.
I have been using X-plane for more than 20 years and have a lot of experience. Most of the time when there is some problem with X-plane (mostly crashes) it is because some plugins problems and mostly conflict between some plugins. Most of these payware aircrafts have there own plugins that will run when you are using that plane. However some developers like X-Aviation and airfoillabs will install plugin in the main plugin folder when you install there products and that plugins will always run when you you are using X-plane 11 regardless if you are using there product or not. I assume that this is also the case with X-plane 12. So if you are running some other product in X-plane with there own plugins it can conflict with these other plugins that are running with no reasons (maybe collecting data). This is very big NO. I also want to mention that Toliss is the only developer that has this fantastic autosave option when you are using his planes so if the sim will crash you can just start it again and continue with your flight.
The Toliss A340 is one of my favorite aircraft because it is so much fun to fly. But if it would get the same update treatment with new cockpit textures and other features that the 320 family gets, it would in my opinion be the absolute best addon for X-Plane.
Mostly agree with this ranking however I would have moved all ToLiss 319/321/340 in position #4 and open up more space for Aerobask Phenom 300 and REP for default R22
Pretty good video as always, only thing I'd disagree with is the Q4XP. It just seems like it still needs some polish to be made before I would consider fully XP12 compatible. Things such as the TERIBBLE performance it gets in XP12 compared to using the Q4XP in XP11 and things like the lack of an APU running sound even after a year and a bit of release.
@@Q8Pilot I understand that. I probably only like it because the A350 is my favourite aircraft, and it was the best/only one for flight sim at the time But I heard they’re making a v2 of it
Terrific video! Lots of great choices, surprises are nice, and hopefully more GA aircraft will join the upper echelon in the not to distant future. Thank you Q8Pilot!!
The only reason I got xplane 12 is due to Q4XP as I am an avid MSFS & DCS first and foremost, but I could not pass up on this new Q4XP just an amazing turbo prop and and I used to fly it on P3D as the Majestic Q400 Dash8...thanks for sharing and I have subscribed
This is the very first time I have disagreed with my favorite RUclips Content Creator! All was well, until, #2 and #1. I believe, by far, with all included between the two, that these should be flip-flopped. In my opinion, there is no better, study-level, aircraft than the 650. No argument at all on the placing of the other aircraft here. The #1 and #2 are a very close call for sure, but when considering everything, flight model, modeling, frequent updates, immersion, consistency, price, etc. I still pick the 650 considering everything. It is a shame the TBM from Hot-Start still isn't ready for Xplane 12 as that too is a gem.
It is ok to disagree, but remember the criteria that I have set for this and weight for each criteria. The price point of the challenger will more than likely leave inaccessible to many in the community, and this has brought its overall rating slightly lower than the Dash 8. Again, I follow a very methodical way, but in the end it is my list of top 10. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
Good list Q8, although I would personally have included the Aerobask Phenom 300 in there as well. Whilst I own quite a few of those a/c I do find it faintly amusing that the aircraft I spend most time with is the FREE Zibo 738 which, in my eyes, is absolutely peerless.
I have made a tutorial on the CIVA INS. It seems complicated, but once you understand the idea, it is very simple. It does take a lot of time to set up though.
Very nice and helpfull video! As a Xplane 12 newbie its always nice to see such a good video. Could you do such a video for "must have addons" for Xplane 12? Thank you =)
Thanks a lot for this video. A big surprise for me to see the Challenger only second because I think it is higher in systems and friendly on FPS compare to the Q4XP. Could you tell me what scenery addons you use in the video for the airfoillabs 172? The landscape is awesome.
The price point of the challenger will more than likely leave it inaccessible to many in the community, and this has brought its overall rating slightly lower than the Dash 8. The scenery used in the AirfoilLabs cessna segment is X-Codr Sedona (The latest version for XP12).
In this moment a340-600 with updated reset buttons brakers, it is the best, has a aircraft engineer you can explore a lot on it, very well simulated for sure, apart of little buses a340 if you power up the aircraft only in batteries you will have static inverter working, this is characteristic of a330 and a340's
Hi there a lot of Airbus aircraft here. I have the FF A320 and I don't much care for Airbus. Perhaps you could do 11-20 or 11-15 to bring some other planes in. Also a factor should be if the plane was available for X-Plane 11 is there a free or reduced price to upgrade it to XP-12. I don't like having to repurchase planes every time XP has an upgrade. Thx.
I'm a real pilot of ultra lights like Tecnam p92, to wich the Cessna is very similar. I'm new in this amazing x-plane 12 that run very well in my system and is very similar to real flying. Where I can find this airkrafts? Can you give my a simply list of sities?
You totally forgot the ToGa Simulations Mitsubishi MU2 V2. It deserves a top 3 spot. In your own review you encountered how much attention is needed operating this AC save and sound and how well engine performance is simulated. 3D modeling and texturing is equal if not better then the Q4XP.
In terms of popularity, the A319 is more popular. It has better textures both inside and out and is easier on frames than the A321. Thanks for watching!
Hello, why the FF320 isn't in the top 10 :(. I love this aircraft but FF are not really active concerning updates... By the way, why does the FF320 only have 136 seats instead of 184?
@@Q8Pilot Actually I was wrong. They have implemented terrain radar at last in the latest version. But the screens look blurry on my system unless I use at least 2 MSAA setting. And this brings my FPS down to 20 on my triple 4k screens. I am using a 4090 FYI and it is still not enough. In fact my question was rhetoric... i.e a polite way to express my relevant opinion just like you express yours in your video. Have a great day!
No Aerobask in your selection ?? No X-Crafts E-Jets ?? OK All the Toliss aircrafts are good.. Ok Concorde, MD-11, 747-200 Classic, Hot Start Challenger 650 (for me the best one), FlyJsim Q4XP (excellent).. But i 'm not agree with, you about FlightFactor B767 !!! Airbus A350 is best... but with Toliss collaboration... don't forget it Thank you very much for your channel and merry Christmas for all people Fly Safe
Couldn't disagree more. To each his own I guess, but airliners and commercial flight leave me cold. About as exciting as simulating a bus station. I'm still a newbie, but the PT-19, Hawk and Bulldog are my top 3.
Great video Seems like X plane is more for deep systems simulation while MSFS is probably suited more for VFR flying, even though MSFS has some study level planes it seems geared more for scenic flying. When I kept hearing people talk about seeing their house and backyard in MSFS I kind of figured Microsoft wanted to focus on eye candy X plane doesn’t have the satellite scenery but the default scenery for England is excellent from what I’ve seen so far I like MSFS but the fabulous Challenger 650 and Colimata Concorde is never coming to MSFS
I enjoy thew Q4XP, it's one of my favourites, but having it in position 1 is almost borderline offensive to a lot of the other developers, especially the 650 you somehow put in position 2 (????). The Q4XP is not at all "study-level"; it has no air conditioning system, no pressure system, and it's drag modelling is only half done (you can fly full speed with your flaps down)...
Price is a criteria that has a lot of weight in my methodology. So if this is going to upset developers, it is fine. After all, this is my list of top 10. Thanks for watching!
Interesting. I will not support flyjsim anymore due to shady marketing practices but fair enough Edit: perhaps shady was the wrong word. I meant misleading.
![[X-Plane 12] AutoOrtho Project is a Game Changer! | On the fly ortho imagery streaming for X-Plane](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bDN4_Ql68k0/mqdefault.jpg)
Great list and mine would not be too dissimilar! I agree with the CL650 position. One of, if not the most comprehensive packages you can get in any sim platform and I absolutely love it but its price puts it out of reach of a lot of people. Great work buddy!
Captain, thank you for stopping by, and for sharing your thoughts. Truly appreciate it. Stay safe, and looking forward to your next stream.
Thanks for the video! It's great that you've also included the developper support in the criteria: it is about time that they got serious about it.
Moreover, I am glad you got back into the content creation game after your break!
Very cool that you ranked the Q4XP first. I think it packs in so much realistic detail and that it's a great option for those who like doing short haul routes.
Completely agree with you there. It is an excellent aircraft and flyjsim has done a brilliant job with this bird.
the challenger is a masterpiece, toto is a genius
I'm glad the Q4Xp ranks first for you. It's also my #1 (although still in XP11) right next to the 'old' IXEG737 ;-)
She is a lovely bird for sure!
@@Q8Pilot I don't remember if you featured MU-2 on your channel? It is also a plane that is fantastically made and has that something about it ... I highly recommend it (I don't know if it is compatible with XP12 yet).
The IXEG is/was the greatest IMO Boeing one could buy. The only sour note to it is the developer's infrequent updates and when they do come it takes forever, in some cases years that as a customer is unacceptable. If the track record continues on the IXEG then the Xplane12 version might not be seen for ages. Shame because this is an awesome add-on and one of my favorites. I just can't forgive the support team and they need a big kick in the pants to get a move on.
@@smokey433 Developers are working on the 12 Version.
@@JulesD92 They are flip-flopping again as usual. It was supposed to be out by March 8th, but now it's pushed back then they add that the FMC will still need to be worked on even after this next so-called update. The developer there is horrible and should be given the "How not to treat customers" award. Has been going on for years with IXEG. Don't you find it odd how a developer like Hot-Start with the Challenger 650, hands down probably the most complex of all Xplane aircraft has an update out and working great in a matter of a couple weeks and others cannot? No excuse for this type of behavior.
Very useful video, and thanks for taking the time to put generic labels in your description for the timestamps and hyperlinks so as not to spoil the surprise of your rankings. I had been considering getting the concorde, and I'd heard of people talking about the Challenger, so I will certainly consider those, when budget allows, due to your recommendation. I already have Q4XP. I only wish I had the time and budget to learn all of these aircraft.
Thanks for watching my friend, and I am glad this was useful for you.
I have been using X-plane for more than 20 years and have a lot of experience. Most of the time when there is some problem with X-plane (mostly crashes) it is because some plugins problems and mostly conflict between some plugins. Most of these payware aircrafts have there own plugins that will run when you are using that plane. However some developers like X-Aviation and airfoillabs will install plugin in the main plugin folder when you install there products and that plugins will always run when you you are using X-plane 11 regardless if you are using there product or not. I assume that this is also the case with X-plane 12. So if you are running some other product in X-plane with there own plugins it can conflict with these other plugins that are running with no reasons (maybe collecting data). This is very big NO.
I also want to mention that Toliss is the only developer that has this fantastic autosave option when you are using his planes so if the sim will crash you can just start it again and continue with your flight.
Brilliant list my friend. I just picked up the Q4XP after watching this video and boy oh boy is it good! Thanks for everything you do mate
Nice video Q8! Ive been waiting for this video:)
The Toliss A340 is one of my favorite aircraft because it is so much fun to fly.
But if it would get the same update treatment with new cockpit textures and other features that the 320 family gets, it would in my opinion be the absolute best addon for X-Plane.
The Toliss has received major texture update in recent months.
Very comprehensive video, thank you. I never considered the Q4XP but will add it to my wishlist.
Thanks for watching!
Thank you! I like the looks of the Dash-8! I was thinking about getting one a while back, but now, with 12, I'm very interested! Thank you!
Thanks for watching the video!
@8:37 can anyone tell me what graphics settings or mods are used to get this ground texture look? TIA.
Yes indeed...,very complex aircraft . Love it!!.
Loving the new channel graphics. Great, in depth video as always! Also, would you consider flying the concorde? Thanks!
Thanks for watching and for your continuous support!
@@Q8Pilot Thank you!
Thanks a lot! Appreciate it. Very nice video. Not finished watching but looks awesome.
Hope you enjoy it! Thanks for watching!
Mostly agree with this ranking however I would have moved all ToLiss 319/321/340 in position #4 and open up more space for Aerobask Phenom 300 and REP for default R22
That's a good suggestion, and I will consider it in future videos!
Pretty good video as always, only thing I'd disagree with is the Q4XP. It just seems like it still needs some polish to be made before I would consider fully XP12 compatible.
Things such as the TERIBBLE performance it gets in XP12 compared to using the Q4XP in XP11 and things like the lack of an APU running sound even after a year and a bit of release.
I take your points, but I still maintain the same position.
Missing WX radar and doesn't do yaw error when adding power (supposedly an XP FM limitation).
This was really good Q8! I loved it!
I really had a good time in the FF A350 last time I was in XP, but I understand why it wasn’t included here
Thanks Mika, appreciate it. The FF A350 needs serious work in all departments at this point in time. Hence not in the top 10 =)
@@Q8Pilot I understand that. I probably only like it because the A350 is my favourite aircraft, and it was the best/only one for flight sim at the time
But I heard they’re making a v2 of it
In my first purchase aircraft in xp12 is this too, i really like the modern stuff, but yes it need more work to make this more good to use
Excellent, been itching to expand the x plane hangar.
Thanks for watching!
Terrific video! Lots of great choices, surprises are nice, and hopefully more GA aircraft will join the upper echelon in the not to distant future. Thank you Q8Pilot!!
Thank you Stan! Appreciate it. I share your hope for more study level GA aircraft. Those are the best for sure!
Great informative video 👍
@Q8Pilot, Please link the scenery, that you use, in this video
Great video, thank you!
Thanks for watching!
Hi, what scenery was used and what is your favourite scenery for X-Plane 12?
The only reason I got xplane 12 is due to Q4XP as I am an avid MSFS & DCS first and foremost, but I could not pass up on this new Q4XP just an amazing turbo prop and and I used to fly it on P3D as the Majestic Q400 Dash8...thanks for sharing and I have subscribed
Welcome to the channel and thank you for taking the time to share your experience.
This is the very first time I have disagreed with my favorite RUclips Content Creator! All was well, until, #2 and #1. I believe, by far, with all included between the two, that these should be flip-flopped. In my opinion, there is no better, study-level, aircraft than the 650. No argument at all on the placing of the other aircraft here. The #1 and #2 are a very close call for sure, but when considering everything, flight model, modeling, frequent updates, immersion, consistency, price, etc. I still pick the 650 considering everything. It is a shame the TBM from Hot-Start still isn't ready for Xplane 12 as that too is a gem.
It is ok to disagree, but remember the criteria that I have set for this and weight for each criteria. The price point of the challenger will more than likely leave inaccessible to many in the community, and this has brought its overall rating slightly lower than the Dash 8. Again, I follow a very methodical way, but in the end it is my list of top 10. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
I totally agree with the q4xp’s 1st place, the sounds in this bird are so immersive. Great video q8!
Thanks for watching and for sharing your thoughts.
Good list Q8, although I would personally have included the Aerobask Phenom 300 in there as well. Whilst I own quite a few of those a/c I do find it faintly amusing that the aircraft I spend most time with is the FREE Zibo 738 which, in my eyes, is absolutely peerless.
The Phenom is great for sure. I will update this list once more aircraft are available for XP12.
Great vid! I would get the Felis but it seems like a big learning curve with the INS
I have made a tutorial on the CIVA INS. It seems complicated, but once you understand the idea, it is very simple. It does take a lot of time to set up though.
@@Q8Pilot I’ll check it out again
My favorite is the Felis 742. The only problem is the lighting on the gears and wings seem to work only at night though.
What a great list my favorite 747 200 god I love that plane
What is the scenery on the AirFoiL Cessna 172 NG?
Wow... love the new opener.
Thanks!
Good Video could you maybe Make the Same Video but With Freeware Aircrafts?
Very nice and helpfull video! As a Xplane 12 newbie its always nice to see such a good video. Could you do such a video for "must have addons" for Xplane 12? Thank you =)
I will work on a must have addons in the near future.
Wonder where the aerobask 300 and 8x would sit in this lineup
Thanks Q8 for the video.
Thanks for watching!
Can u make a video with the top 10 mods for xplane 12? Please thanks. Awesome videos always.
Thanks a lot for this video. A big surprise for me to see the Challenger only second because I think it is higher in systems and friendly on FPS compare to the Q4XP.
Could you tell me what scenery addons you use in the video for the airfoillabs 172? The landscape is awesome.
The price point of the challenger will more than likely leave it inaccessible to many in the community, and this has brought its overall rating slightly lower than the Dash 8. The scenery used in the AirfoilLabs cessna segment is X-Codr Sedona (The latest version for XP12).
@@Q8Pilot Thanks a lot for this information.
I would consider Torquesim SR22 G1000 to be on my top 10, surprised it didn't make it onto yours
It's not compatible with XPlane 12 yet, hence not on the list.
@@Q8Pilot ah yes good point
Is the q400 fps issue is fixed in xplane 12? I remember in xp11 was very bad
Yes it has been fixed with the latest update.
What was your GPU at the time of filming this? Still the Zotac 4090?
I think so yes.
I love the 747-200 of felis, it seems too real and also is the most fun aircraft that I ever flown
What scenery is at 8:45? Looks really nice…
That would be X-Codr Sedona (KSEZ).
@@Q8Pilot thanks!
Is there A documentation or Flight tutorial includes when buying the hotstart challenger ?
The aircraft comes with massive documentation yes. For a tutorial, watch Q8Pilot videos and streams =)
In this moment a340-600 with updated reset buttons brakers, it is the best, has a aircraft engineer you can explore a lot on it, very well simulated for sure, apart of little buses a340 if you power up the aircraft only in batteries you will have static inverter working, this is characteristic of a330 and a340's
Hi there a lot of Airbus aircraft here. I have the FF A320 and I don't much care for Airbus. Perhaps you could do 11-20 or 11-15 to bring some other planes in. Also a factor should be if the plane was available for X-Plane 11 is there a free or reduced price to upgrade it to XP-12. I don't like having to repurchase planes every time XP has an upgrade. Thx.
I'm surprised ssg 747 did not make list as it is amazing
What about FFA320?
Nope
I'm a real pilot of ultra lights like Tecnam p92, to wich the Cessna is very similar. I'm new in this amazing x-plane 12 that run very well in my system and is very similar to real flying. Where I can find this airkrafts? Can you give my a simply list of sities?
Thanks for watching! You can the aircraft at the xplane org store.
This may be off topic, but how is the standard ATC in Xplane 12 compared to msfs (which is crap).
Improved from XP11 but still not very good. It has some really accurate phraseology and VFR capable, but still needs a lot of work in my opinion.
Could you also do a top 10 freeware?
Sure, I will try to have this done soon.
You totally forgot the ToGa Simulations Mitsubishi MU2 V2. It deserves a top 3 spot. In your own review you encountered how much attention is needed operating this AC save and sound and how well engine performance is simulated. 3D modeling and texturing is equal if not better then the Q4XP.
It is not compatible with X-Plane 12 at the time of making the video hence it was not included.
@@Q8Pilot It works great in xp12 sofar.
@Nuke Nabber not officially
@@Q8Pilot ok thx, I agree with your choices by the way 🙂
Why do you think the Toliss A319 is better than the Toliss A321. I just wondered thats all. Thanks for the video.
In terms of popularity, the A319 is more popular. It has better textures both inside and out and is easier on frames than the A321. Thanks for watching!
@@Q8Pilot Many Thanks
Texturing and modelling has always been shoddy in toliss aircraft when done inhouse.
Yes indeed, still very robust aircraft and very fulfilling.
I always think the Colimata external model looks off. I think its the scaling
It is still the best Concorde for Flight Sim.
@@Q8Pilot No doubt. Do you think its just me or is the model a little off?
Hello, why the FF320 isn't in the top 10 :(. I love this aircraft but FF are not really active concerning updates... By the way, why does the FF320 only have 136 seats instead of 184?
Probably because it has a lot of bugs and glitches. I was very disappointed with the FF A320 when I brought it.
@@nicklausmb Thank you for your answer. I agree with you, I'm disappointed of the 320. Which one between the 319 and the 321 you advice me to buy?
@@Morgan.C24 Probably the A319 as my first choice just like Q8 listed.
@@Morgan.C24 I prefer the 321
Nice list but the commentary sounded a bit robotic 😃
Thanks Glenn, yes I had an issue with the audio and tired as much as possible to use filters to correct it. My apologies!
At times. It sounded like. William. Shatner. Doing. His. Most bionic voice.
@@Q8Pilot No worries my friend. Only thing I would have changed in your list would be swapping the CL650 with the Q400
The Q4xp lacks rerrain radar which is catastrophic. How could it be no1?
To you it is catastrophic to me its not. May be it is not no 1 for you but is for me. Your question is irrelevant.
@@Q8Pilot Actually I was wrong. They have implemented terrain radar at last in the latest version. But the screens look blurry on my system unless I use at least 2 MSAA setting. And this brings my FPS down to 20 on my triple 4k screens. I am using a 4090 FYI and it is still not enough. In fact my question was rhetoric... i.e a polite way to express my relevant opinion just like you express yours in your video. Have a great day!
Are you a real Pilot? You sure know your stuff!
No Aerobask in your selection ?? No X-Crafts E-Jets ??
OK All the Toliss aircrafts are good.. Ok Concorde, MD-11, 747-200 Classic, Hot Start Challenger 650 (for me the best one), FlyJsim Q4XP (excellent)..
But i 'm not agree with, you about FlightFactor B767 !!! Airbus A350 is best... but with Toliss collaboration... don't forget it
Thank you very much for your channel and merry Christmas for all people
Fly Safe
Challenger 650 should be first, it beats every add on in all compartment imo
I respect your opinion, but I maintain my position on my list of top 10.
What? No Aerobask?
Aerobask have an excellent lineup but none came in the top 10. Perhaps in the top 10 GA.
A320????
Couldn't disagree more. To each his own I guess, but airliners and commercial flight leave me cold. About as exciting as simulating a bus station.
I'm still a newbie, but the PT-19, Hawk and Bulldog are my top 3.
Interesting, none of your top 3 have native X-Plane 12 compatibility.
@@Q8Pilot you've tried them?
@Back2TheBike if does not have native support it's not in the list.
Great video
Seems like X plane is more for deep systems simulation while MSFS is probably suited more for VFR flying, even though MSFS has some study level planes it seems geared more for scenic flying. When I kept hearing people talk about seeing their house and backyard in MSFS I kind of figured Microsoft wanted to focus on eye candy
X plane doesn’t have the satellite scenery but the default scenery for England is excellent
from what I’ve seen so far
I like MSFS but the fabulous Challenger 650 and Colimata Concorde is never coming to MSFS
Two great flight simulators, and lots for us flight simmers to enjoy.
FlyJsim Q400, is the best.
It is indeed!
please remove the atc sounds in the background. other than that, awesome video!
Noted with thanks!
I enjoy thew Q4XP, it's one of my favourites, but having it in position 1 is almost borderline offensive to a lot of the other developers, especially the 650 you somehow put in position 2 (????). The Q4XP is not at all "study-level"; it has no air conditioning system, no pressure system, and it's drag modelling is only half done (you can fly full speed with your flaps down)...
Price is a criteria that has a lot of weight in my methodology. So if this is going to upset developers, it is fine. After all, this is my list of top 10. Thanks for watching!
why so expensive im just a little guy :(
Run the X-Plane installer and overwrite the settings file. It will restore the original settings.
Is this AI?
@@ozzie-sk9dh no
I would suggest to remove two ga planes and rename video to best payware airliners for x plane. Really wtf??
I would suggest you make your own video and give the title you wish.
@@Q8Pilot ooooh
I keep trying to go back to xp but 12 just looks so bad…
Interesting. I will not support flyjsim anymore due to shady marketing practices but fair enough
Edit: perhaps shady was the wrong word. I meant misleading.
Not sure what shady marketing they did, but FlyJSim is an excellent developer and Jack is a really fine folk.
What did they do ?
I think he is mixing with flight sim studio
@@JoaoSamouco Probably so, FlyJSim is just an excellent company all around.
@@Q8Pilot misleading. Questionable claims about the planes being authentic and tested by real world pilots of the type. (727 and 737).