Canon RF 24-105mm f/4 L IS Lens Review: The BEST kit lens?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024
- LAST DAY to win a Canon EOS R: freesdp.com
Canon 24-105mm f/4R ($1,099): sdp.io/C105R
Canon EOS R ($2,300): sdp.io/R
We've now taken over 1,600 photos with the Canon EOS R and the 24-105 f/4 lens... and it's a pretty fantastic combination for general, do-it-all consumer photography. The RF 24-105 f4 L IS is sharper than other kit lenses we've tested, including the Sigma 24-105 f4 and the Canon EF 24-105 f4 L IS. It's almost as sharp as the Canon 24-70 f/2.8, but not quite (and of course, it's a stop slower). While it's not a professional-grade lens, it's well-built, fairly compact, and extremely versatile.
Update: I malfunctioned while discussing contrast. The bunched up histogram is worse, not better. My developers have been notified of the problem.
Great Video Thumbs Up 👍
😂
Sorry, didn't understood the disclaimer... what was wrong, if anything, and what did you "malfunctioned"?
Great information btw, thanks
Very nice Mr. Tony wish im the luckiest😊😊
I was briefly thinking that you might have had it backwards when you said that. . . LOL
3 rings? You're missing the important one: the Red Ring!
I’m using this lens 95% of the time. Light, sharp, versatile and beautiful.
I have a lot of expensive lens, and heavy too. After buying this little beast, I rarely use another lens.
Juliano Guerra what type of photography do you do? Do you use for weddings?
@@femibear pornography
I have the new Sony 24-105 F4 and I can highly recommend it. If the Canon is the same it is an easy pick for all Canon shooters
I actually switched to SONY when I saw the EOS-R. Basic things like a joystick, dual card slots and faster framerate + 120fps in 1080p made it really a no-brainer. And with the 3rd party lenses like the new Tamron 28-75 f2.8 - You can now get better value glass.
Its interesting to see that lenses because of the distance and they are forced to design from nothing now seem to match some of the sony's that didn't really get enough praise. Many of the FE G and GM lenses are very sharp and we should not be shocked the R's will start showing a good jump over the dslr versions because of these reasons.
Question: I've got an eos R body on the way and need to purchase a lens. I'm moving from an m50, so full frame is new to me.
Will f/4 on the Eos R be fast enough to take decent shots in indoor lighting? Not being able to do that is my biggest pet peeve about using the m50.
@@relentlessburrito It depends. If there is very little light indoors, then you might need to crank up your iso but full frame cameras like the Eos R are good in low light because of their large sensor. So, just crank up your iso and you'll be fine until and unless you shoot in a really really dark environment, but you'll be able to take pretty good photos in decent indoor lighting. You'll still get decent/usable photos in very low light
Christian Heid unfortunately the color grading is hell x(
Sorry, I'm a pro and I am using the EOS-R as my primary camera. I do landscapes and portrait work for which I get paid (so I guess you might consider that professional. The focusing on the R is unreal and quite frankly for many if not most general usage the 24-105 RF lens is not a particular compromise in build quality (let alone it's high quality hood). Not sure you're being completely fair but then I understand you prefer the highest level of performing products in general.
Here in Brazil most weddings are shot with the 80D or D7200. Those youtube reviewers are becoming too demanding. Professionals buy camera as tools to make money, so why would anyone buy a 1DXII for a newborn session? Greetings from Brazil.
Rodrigo P.C. I completely agree. I use Canon T6 rebels with L series lenses as the t6 is lightweight, takes great enough pictures for weddings, and can easily be replaced if broken or stolen.
Yeah, the camera is basically a mirrorless slightly upgraded version of the 5D Mark IV. Since when is that level not for professional use?
Greetings from China, I use a 6D2 with a 24-105ef at work and still get paid. It's really about taking more pictures, not buying more stuff.
I did my first paid photography work using a 450D and the nifty 50 / 1.8. I did my first wedding with the 450D and a 5D Mark II as my two bodies.
Absolutely this camera is good enough for professional work.
Next video:
Canon 24-105 f/1.4R Lens Review: The BEST lens you can also sleep in
You can already sleep in the 28-70 f2. That thing is ridiculous for a 28-70.
@@raksh9 But the monitor in the Video Shows 24-105 F1.4R ;)
@@Lofote omg you're right! WTF
Noticed that, and got some pictures in my head. :D
I bought one. I prefer prime lenses, not sure about quality of pictures, but build quality is great. For me, f4 pretty dark, sharpness ok, not unbelievable, stabilizer really good, etc. And my favorite part - zooming, incredibly smooth, much smoother than my 24-70 2.8 II.
does the screen really say 24-105 f1.4??
Man I wish
Indeed it does. I thought my 50mm f/2.8 eyes needed to be recalibrated ;)
A dream comes true :))
Lol sorry wishful thinking
I dunno, you read it and tell me!
- the AF is good AF
- kicks butts
- not a lot of flare
- great contrast
- amazing IS
I strongly prefer using EF lenses with my R7, and of my 26 lenses, only 2 are RF. I utilize 3 different EF to RF adapters; speedbooster, rear filter holder, and standard.
Hello and Happy New Year
Are you adapting a Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 MKII for your R7? I have several EF & EF-S lenses that I’m adapting to my R6MKII. I was thinking of purchasing an EF 24-70mm (L) mark II primarily for my 90D. Thanks
The DSLR version of this lens was very versatile, and I think this one will be just as much.
Thanks for another great review Tony!
It is but the first version was prone to the ribbon cable failing, err01. Very common problem the newer version is hopefully sorted out in that area. This looks good, as is the Sony - but at a high cost for a useful zoom range.
@@MrBazReviews Canon looks better built, including the EOS R vs. A7III. I currently shoot with two Sony cameras, but if one day I upgrade to "full frame", it will be this combo tested here.
Tony, I just bought the Canon EOS RP with the 24-105 RF lens. I made an enlargement to 36" by 60", it looked like a 8" by10". I got remarkable sharpness, truly worth the Camera of the Year for under $2000 dollars. Thanks for endorsement. GWR
No doubt the Eos R has some weaknesses, but as soon I see the firmware that they spoke about, that will improve the Eye AF I will place my order, with this lens, that seems to be their best all purpose lens ever.
@Foto4Max Doesn't matter to me, I am not a video guy.
Richard, don't hold your breath ... The EOS -R may not have enough processing power for more complex software . I have been using it for last two weeks and it feels like the camera was put together in the last few minutes ... Just my opinion.
@@mralexlex Since it already has face tracking, at which point data is already read of the sensor, and eyes identified, I find it highly unlikely that they would not be able to do that. But, we will see.
You've now reviewed both of the lenses for the new Canon mirrorless system and neither of the ones for the new Nikon mirrorless system. For those of us who want to make decisions based on the lenses for the new systems, please review the Nikon Z series lenses!
Tony, if you were me and you own the first generation 24-105 and the Canon EOSR, would you (A) Sell it and pick up the new RF 24-105 or (B) Sell it and get the 24-70 2.8 II EF and use it with the adapter? I like the idea of having the larger aperture for faster speed and lower ISO, but would I miss the IS? I know this is subjective, but I would love to hear your thoughts. Thank you!
I am selling my 24-105 f4 for the RF 24-105 f4 version. I also own the 24-70 f2.8 II L. I love that lens and it performs very well on the EOS-R but I am still one of those who doesn't like to use adapters even though the EF to RF adapter is fine, it just creates extra bulk and length to the lens and more weight. With those new lenses they just announced I need to make a decision on selling my existing EF L lenses to convert to RF as it seems Canon will not be supporting them in the near future or just adapt them. Not sure what to do at this point as I still have my 5DM4 which can use them. At some point when the Mark 4 shows its age the L lenses will be sold to go over to the RF lenses. But to answer your question the RF 24-105 is nice unless you want the added benefit of the 24-70 f2.8 but keep in mind you lose image stabilization on the 24-70 f2.8 unless you buy the new RF version.
Holy crap, Canon. Stepping up their game. Now just make a body we want.
Yea like an R5
@@timelesscreations777 Yeah, except I can't afford it D:
R6
More and more Canon's mirrorless is getting lots of love. I don't use it, just noticing it in reviews.
Great review Tony! I was wondering how the RF 24-105mm f/4 would stack up against the Sony FE 24-105mm f/4, and I must say I'm impressed!
So far it seems like the RF lenses are sharper than their EF counterparts, and neck to neck with Sony's glass, which is really compelling. However, I'm not 100% sold on the EOS R yet, and I'll probably wait to see what Canon releases next year.
Yeah, I will wait for that juicy Sony A7R III / Nikon Z7 counterpart.
... and then probably buy the Sony lol
@@juanquispe3494 Quite frankly I want to see that IBIS they patented, two slots, and no 4K crop. Right now, only Sony provides a well-rounded FF at a very affordable price. Also, keep in mind that Panasonic will be joining the FF club, and the S1/S1R look like they will be kicking some butt as well. I honestly can't wait for next year because it's going to be a great year for photography.
Can't wait for Canon's "pro" body. I might get this EOS R just in the meantime to get into the eco system. These lenses are insane
what do you expect from it?
Nothing that Canon has put out in years would give any confidence they are going to be able to create a pro camera. I think this was meant to be the pro camera, but after Nikon got ripped apart they changed their tune.
@@Lofote After using this body I think it's great. I don't care about video whatsoever so all of that is a non issue for me. What's most important to me is that the camera WORKS and that the experience of using it is good and streamlined, and this is. If they release a "pro" body with dual card slots, higher frame rate, higher MP, and improve face detection, then I'd be happy.
@@jamesryan1939 That's why I don't see any professional shooting with Canon. I'm a pretty smart amateur shooting with Sony, I should switch to Canon since I'm not a pro.
Rodrigo P.C. I mainly see people with Canon, professionals and amateurs. What Sony camera body are you using? I’m considering the A7RII for landscape- and street photography, but I’m not sure.
Well, at 6:17 you zoomed in on Turkey, but since my place was in the shot too - greetings from Sofia, Bulgaria. And keep up with the good work, your channel is great :)
A selfie with a DSLR is like an arm workout
Tony, thanks! You’ve just answered my question for today. I’m off to buy the Canon R6 and didn’t know if I should buy the 24-105Mm kit lens. Years ago I took your advice and changed the Canon for the Sigma 24-105mm. Now I’m pitching all my DSLR gear and slowly going Mirrorless with an adapter to start with. I don’t shoot video so no problem with overheating for me. Happy with all your reviews. Thank you!
I got an EPS R (Body Only) for Christmas and have been using it with a Sigma 24-105A (RF adapter). Absolutely beautiful results. The Sigma 24-105 is a much better lens than my old Canon 24-105L (v1). My wife and I travel a lot and the 24-105 makes for a great walk around lens. Is the RF 24-105 as good as the Sigma?
I'm planning on keeping my 6Dm2 and 7Dm2. How are other people handling keeping their older EF mount cameras?
Thank you for a great and thorough review. I just picked up this lens a day ago and so watching your review after I purchased it confirmed I chose well. Though I did strongly consider the RF 24-70 2.8 lens and had I been a wedding or portrait photographer - I would have purchased that one instead. Thank you so much for a great video review.
I always enjoy your videos, even when it is about a camera or lens I am not even thinking of buying. You do really nice work.
LOL... I would really wait at least half a year using a thing before saying it's my favorite thing of all time.
Better than Fuji’s 18-55?
I didn't test them side by side but we found the 18-55 unacceptable (we use the 16-55)
@@TonyAndChelsea unacceptable just in terms of IQ?
18-55 is a solid lens. Compact, good IQ. Just the OIS is a bit unpredictable.
EOS RP, with the new firmware- would you choose this lense over a Tamron 24-70 g1 or g2 2.8?
This is my favorite lens range, this is so versatile. Tony, I must say I really love the content you are doing, it inspires me to do better on my channel and constantly up my game. You rock :-)
It's a shame the EOS-R lenses are not backward compatible
I'll pass on this one
24-105 f4 R or should I spend the same money on the Tamron 24-70 2.8 G2 with the adapter on the EOS R?
Native lens holds their value better and work better with the body.
How is the dust sealing on this particular RF lens? I've heard photographers having a nightmare with Tamron and Sigma's current 24-70 due to dust getting sucked in to the lens due to poor sealing on the extending lens barrel. To your knowledge, does the RF F4 24-105mm L have a filter between the extending barrel and the main barrel to prevent dust from getting sucked into the lens? Or in your extensive use of the lens, have you detected any issues with dust [long term use]?
Great video. Thank you for also giving us results for the Sigma 24-105 f/4, as I previously bought that lens on your recommendation. Curious about the Sigma 50-150 f/1.8...I know it originally had focusing problems with a DSLR, but with a mirrorless it should focus more consistently, correct?
Im definitely looking to get this one for my new EOS R camera for my Golf Vlogs. Thanks for the breakdown!
Witch lens would you recommend for the r6 for video: 24-105 L or 24-70 L?
Good question
3:44 But, but, i like flaring.
That's one aspect of modern lens's perfection that i dont like.
Flares are one of those imperfections that gives a certain something to a photo.
WOW! One of your favorite lenses of all time? That's a big statement for a lens that's been out for a few months.
I raised my eyebrow as well.
Months? A few weeks only.
@@oriomenoni7651 I was trying to give them some extra time since they were part of the promo launch. Still a big statement for such little time.
Hey Tony, thanks for the video, your channel is really amazing. btw the Rode NT1a you're using is picking up the signal from the side, try it and you'll get a lot more on-axis and healthier sound.
Thanks Tony! You guys always do great stuff.
Hello Tony, thanks for the reviews. I would be very interested in some comparisons between the latest canon RF’s and the sony GM’s: how compare the canon RF 70-200 f2.8 vs sony GM 70-200 f2.8. The same for the canon RF 15-35 vs sony GM 16-35
You’re calling this R but I’m only finding L
Wait did I miss something... did you say you already did a full review of the X-T3?? Or is that still to come? Love your reviews, keep up the great work!
I wish ones would stop calling it “not a pro camera” - I understand the R’s cons ... but it I make money with mine ... isn’t that pro? - I also LOVE THE HECK OUT OF IT - for the price ... I don’t think it can be beat ... imho and for me
especially now as of 12/16/2019 its for $1500.
Very well review and helped me to be sure buying Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS lens. Also happy to see my home country Turkey in your video. Thanks...
Great video, superb lens. I just wouldn't say the EOS R isn't a profeesional body, since here in Brazil most portrait sessions are shot with Rebels and weddings are mainly shot with EOS 80D or Nikon D7200. Have a good sunday.
The Northrups live a very exclusive, high-end North American lifestyle. Lots of us here in the US don't, and happily use the proletarian gear you mentioned for every purpose.
@@patrickfitzgerald2861 Hi, Patrick. It's good to know I'm not the only poor person on the internet. Here in Brazil, Canon sells the EOS 6D II for more than US$4000 body only. I wonder how much will cost the EOS R. Greetings from the southern hemisphere.
Greetings from Tucson, Arizona Rodrigo! Where are you in Brazil?
@@patrickfitzgerald2861 São Bernardo do Campo, in the São Paulo metropolitan area.
Lula's home town, yes?
As usual... great info... yup noticed the mistake on Histogram.. If I win the EOS R, I am getting this lens for sure..
Having no luck "on the internet," thought it best to turn to the expert: Tony and/or Chelsea, how well does the IS system of the RF 24-105 L work with the IS system of the Canon R6 or R5? Which IS system takes precedence? If neither, how are they coordinated? How are conflict issues resolved?
I loved my EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM. Now its a newer ending project to turn into a cup.
I just ordered this one because the 28-70 is a little bit out of our reach money wise lol and I have been doing a lot of weddings lately. I love using the 50 and 85 for those, but the lack of stabilization shows some times. Also this will be great for a lot of my video work.
Tony, just picked up a EOS R + RF 24-105mm f/4L IS for only $2199 ($1499 + $899 - $200 B&H discount). What do you thin? Worth it?
Curious how heavy this combo is for vlogging? I've yet to see anything close to it if it's not too heavy.
My favorite useful lens and favorite useful camera.
Would this be a good lens for landscape photography if I could only buy one lens for my Canon EOS R8?
Can you review the new Sigma 60-600mm lens? Thanks!!
How does the canon 24-70mm F4 L lens with the adapter compare to the RF 24-105mm lens? I’m debating as to whether I should spend the extra little bit for the kit or not on the new R6 right now. If I switched to the 24-105 I would lose the macro capability is one thing I could think of.
as of right now 12/16/2019 its for $1500 at that price you can't beat the performance for price.. may pick one up i just wish it shot more fps 10 instead of 5
How does it compare to the Sony 24-105 f/4 and Sigma 24-105 f/4?
Can you do a review on the 35mm RF? How does it compare to the Sigma 35mm Art? How sharp is it compared to the 35mm range on the 24-105mm RF and the 28-70mm RF?
It's relatively cheap, don't know if it's totally worthless or if Canon was able to work some magic with it. Seems they wouldn't want to shoot themselves in the foot by making it a better lens than their EF counterparts, but they seemingly did that by making the 24-105 sharper than the EF 24-70 II (altho, 1 stop slower..)
That would be awesome. Thanks.
Tony I actually dropped my 24-105, replaced it with the 24-240
seems that, canon is doing really good with their lenses ...
I'm on the fence on which camera to buy. Which one would you get for video? The eos r or the 5d mark iv?
Tony -- the big question. distortion at 24mm compared to 24-70L II?
My copy of the lens has a bit of play in the front, anyone else that has this. Everything works, but just feels a bit non-L:ish.. :)
I have IBIS in my Olympus. Why doesn't Canon do that? I'll stick to M43 until the camera becomes the limitation instead of me.
Bob, why do you need IBIS, and professional shooters shooting Canon do not ? I dont need ibis, because, in the real world, subjects move.
Why do you need ibis ?
@@nordic5490 Chris at DP Review says the lack of IBIS is a "huge letdown".
Bob, dpreview are an on line photography news site that is flogging advertising space - that is their business model. Writing something a bit contraversial means more clicks, means more revenue. Entertainment mate.
Back in the real world, Canons best pro wide and midlength lenses wide do not even have IS eg, the 16-35mm F2.8 Liii and the 24-70mm F2.8 Lii (I have these) do not have IS as pros do not need this. Subjects more in the real world and is or ibis only stabilises the background.
IS is usefull at longer focal lengths, eg >200mm if the subject isn't moving, but Canon argues that image stabilising is best done in lens. The irony is, that when I am birding @ 560mm, I often turn the IS of as it can hinder birds-in-flight photography. IS is for video.
Yes, the EOSR is not a pupose built video camera, go and buy a BMPCC4K for video.
Do you still love this as an all around lens?
I’m an RP owner still not able to decide on my first RF lens. Do I go for the 35 or hold out/save up another third more UK pennies for the 24-105 F4. I suppose it depends on whether the majority of my photos using EF lenses are around the 35mm?
Great information thank you guys
I’m looking for a setup to improve the quality of my videos... I need a camera/lens that can take small details during video (I do makeup videos and mostly at closeup, therefore I need a camera/lens able to take the details of the shimmer colors vs the flat colors) and don’t loose quality when zooming during post production.... is this setup a perfect match???
Thanks for the great video Tony. I do everyday photography, wedding and other event photography.
I have EOS R5 and confused to get a lens. which one do you suggest ?
Sigma 24-70 F2.8 Art lens with RF adaptor or Canon RF 24-105 F4L
Tony I do not understand how to get infinity focus with the 24-105mm f/4 lens. I see markings 0.45m/1.48ft-00 at the base of the lens but no infinity marks. How do you achieve infinity instead of using hyperfocal charts all the time?
Just got one from Amazon. There is quite loud high-frequency sound while focusing (or maybe it's Image Stabilizer?). When framing via viewfinder it's quite disturbing. Is it normal, or maybe I have got not good one?
Hi T&C. I'm debating on either this lens with a Canon R6, OR the Nikon Z7 with the 24-70 f/4 Nikkor S. In terms of sharpness and detail rendition at similar focal lengths and apertures, which system would give me more detail at large print sizes? Thanks!
ok...i really like the x-t3 but the lack of in body stabilisation turns me off...how important do you guys thing IBIS is in a modern camera? every input helps! thx!
Fujifilm X-T3 review. I'm still waiting patiently for that :)
You guys are so helpful!!!
I own the 35mm macro, the 50mm 1.2, and this. Honestly, this is my least favorite. It's boring, slow, and isn't particularly sharp. At least it's stabilized I guess. I normally don't expect much from a kit lens but this is supposedly L-grade glass. I'm just not seeing it.
On a side note, the 35mm is seriously underrated.
The 35mm is the only native lens I'm considering because of its size and weight.
Brett the Behemoth own the 35 as well and love it. Was considering the 24-105 but your comment might’ve saved me $1200.
Your findings on the RF 24-105 are contrary to the reviews and dxomark findings - which conclude that it’s as sharp as the vaunted EF 24-70 F/2.8 II at F4 in the same focal range
How does it compare to the Sony 24-105 g lens?
Can you please review the Canon RF 100-400. I am looking for a light weight lens for travel and zoo photography. I am trying to decide between the RF 70-200 f4 and rf 100-400.
I understand that the 100-400 does not have the build of an L lens and that it is dimmer than the L lens. I want to make sure that I buy a sharp lens. In the past the 70-300 lens have been notoriously unsharp.The rf 100-400 will pair better with my rf 24-105 F4 lens.
Great video
CANON is KING!!! Always Has Been!!! 💪
Question: I've got an eos R body on the way and need to purchase a lens. I'm moving from an m50, so full frame is new to me.
Will f/4 on the Eos R be fast enough to take decent shots in indoor lighting? Not being able to do that is my biggest pet peeve about using the
Ooops, the video title is "24-105 F/4 L". I think you meant "24-105 F/4 R".
I own the former, and it's a great lens! I was intrigued that you'd produced a video about this old lens. Then I realized, you were talking about the R! No disappointment here though; it was a great video.
L is not a mount. The name of the lens is: "Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM"
Hi Tony, I have a Canon 24-105 mm F4 lens for my Canon 80D. I note on your same 24-105 lens it has a lock on the barrel to stop lens drift, which my lens does not. Is my lens an older version of the more recent 24-105? Is it worth getting the newer 24-105mm lens with the lock or getting the 18-135mm F3.5 Canon lens? I gather the 24-105mm lens you mention in this video is for full frame cameras?
In the market for a mirrorless camera, probably the R6. I have EF glass and equivalents in Tamrom and Sigma. So, other than buying an RF-EF adaptor I am looking at at least one RF lens. I already have the EF24-105L f4 lens. How does this RF version compare and have you used them on the newer R cameras (R5, R6, R3)?
Thanks
Martin (from Australia).
I also run R6 with the EF 24-105L II. Tbh it works better than on DSLR thanks to the superior autofocus. The RF version major advantage is lighter, and better IS in video.
When you talk about the EF 24-105, are you talking about the old version or the new? I don’t remember you comparing the new one with the Sigma, but I may be wrong. If I’m not, can you please throw that version II into the mix? :)
Medium range zooms overlooked ? 50 /70 to 300 400 range v versatile too much more range and they usually not so sharp faster or longer u can usually step back not always get closer speedbooster apsc can take off in good light for reach or on if need the light interesting option lighter
Many tks! Now There is the new RF24-70 2,8, would you suggest me to buy that one instead of the RF24-104 4?
Do the Sony and Nikon lenses for their mirrorless cameras also have same design with rear element?
Chelsea, how about a redo with this lens and the R5?
Glad i saw this. So this won't work on a canon 80d?
No. The "R" mount is not compatible.
Interesting video, Tony! I'm researching a FF System, and so far, was considering the Nikon Z7, Panasonic S1 (no need for S1R due to the "High Resolution Mode" in both these cameras), and also, one of the Canon FF models like the R, though I'm not fond of that "Multi-Function Bar" control. In terms of image sharpness and detail in large prints, do you have a preference of one of these systems? Thanks~
I can't vouch for the other systems but I was very happy with the R. It has the same sensor as the 5Div. You don't say what you're taking photos of and that is a consideration. You might consider the R6 at this point as it is a serious step up, except for resolution.
is sigma better than the canon 24 105 mark 2?
After 2 years who won the EOS R
Wow Look great this lens , Much sharper , TFS
Love it Mr. Tony
Tony I have a tough question for you. I don't want to by a Canon EOS RP 26 MP with a less Mp lens. Will I get 26 Mp with a Canon RF 24-240 lens? Gary R.
Probably not. Even a prime 85mn 1.2 struggles with 26mp
I used a Canon Powershot Pro 1 bridge camera some years ago. It has an 8 megapixel sensor. I zoomed in at the pixels at some of my photos, and found that the real useful resolution was not more than 4 megapixels. So I set the camera to produce 4 megapixel files. There was nothing to gain by choosing 8 MP resolution. I now have an EOS RP. My favorite all-round lens is the RF 24-105 f4 L. This combination is very different from the old Powershot, because there is good and useful information in all the 26 megapixels. I would loose information if I were to select a lower than 26 MP resolution for my JPG files. So I am happy with the resolution of this glass.
Hey tony you think is a good buy the 16-35 f4 is , is there a huge difference between the rf 15-35 in quality??? just for social media?
For social media, might as well go for the lighter RF15-30, IS+IBIS make it equivalent to EF 16-35L f4 IS
Thanks for great info 👍!!!
Why does your screen in the beginning of the video say "f/1.4 R??????? Is it an f/4 or f/1.4??? Also at 6:33 in it says on the screen both photos are "Canons" and not a Sony. It's a little confusing.
Not sure where to post this, but can anyone help?
I own Canon L series lens, when turning the lens vertical the lens came off the camera. I noticed that there is no clicking sound when I attach the lens, what could the problem be?
Sony needs to bring out a new 24-70 F/2.8