Genuinely I love that any time I want to research a lens a Christopher frost video is ALWAYS at the top and the familiarity has made me think “I hope Christopher made a video about this lens” and not once have I been disappointed! You’re doing photography Jesus’ work Christopher ❤️
Exactly! And that is why I signed up to his Patreon account for monthly donation. I really appreciate the work that he puts into his reviews. He addresses the new versions AND the old versions to help us make our lens buying decisions. Love it!!
The only truly unbiased review that mentioned the hazy image quality when close to minimum focus distance wide open (and up to about 1 meter focus distance in my experience) Subscribed immediately!
I am using my "old" EF glas with the EF-2-RF mount adapter with the control ring. So I have this feature also to my "old" EF and EF-S lenses. They are working pretty well on my EOS RP and R7. And my EF L lenses are performing very good on the R mirrorless system with the adapter. Thank you for your work for testing all this (for me Canon) lenses!!!
Thanks as always, Christopher! My 24-105 EF was my absolute favorite, go-to, walkaround lens for most applications. Having finally moved to mirrorless (R5 and R6 Mk II), it was a no-brainer to add the RF version to my bag (once I got my 100-500 and 200-800 lenses, that is). The 24-105 RF just came today, and I'm really looking forward to putting it through its paces!
Please dont change the way you reviewe in the future like some other youtubers. Your doing so great. These type of reviews are the best man. Oneday you should reach more than a million subs. Good luck!
great! honest unbiased review with tests, but more importantly your reasoned opinion. This is the one i wanted in my anticipated switch from Nikon to Canon, unless I look at it's lighter weight brother.
I got one of the old EF 24-105/4 kit'd with my 5D mk2 back when that camera was launched. It's the only lens I've ever abused. I once managed to drop it by not having closed my camera bag and standing up, it fell out and landed on the sidewalk. It still works 100% but the filter screw thread got FUBAR bent. I've always been really impressed with my little 24-105 that it's still alive and kicking and I've since (knock on wood) never done something that stupid to my gear.
Thank you so so so much for getting the R camera, I got mine last month and love it! I’m really looking forward to seeing your reviews on the RF 2.8 lenses canon has coming later this year, again thank you for doing RF camera lenses!
I bought one of these for my wife. She uses it on her EOS RP. The focus speed on this lens is amazing. I have an EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L II that we used on her RP via the adapter and the focus speed on that lens isn't nearly as fast as this lens. Its also lightweight. We bought it pre-owned. We buy most of our Canon products either pre-owned or Canon refurbished. We save tons of $$$$$.
Thank you for comparing the IQ between the RF and EF models. I have the EF version and was curios if it was worth spending the money on the RF version. This review was very helpful. Thank you.
Absolutely fantastic review of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4 lens. I was looking whole the RUclips community for someone like this guys to do these review biaselessly. Thanks #Chris thanks for being there.
Nicely done mate! Thanks a lot i learned quite a bit here. Bought my EOS R this weekend with the KIT lens and cant wait to test it. Cheers from Germany
The fact every image in this review was taken with a "kit" lens demonstrates just how versatile this lens is. Honestly beautiful bokeh from an f/4 zoom.
@@beezymeech what do you call a lens that’s bundled with a camera body at a discount? I believe the overwhelming majority of photographers would call that…a “kit lens”. Haha the EF and RF 24-105 lenses have often been referred to as kit lenses for professional and semi professional bodies. I got my RF 24-105 included with my EOS R.
Whenever I search lens review in RUclips... There's always a top recommendation of a guy always saying and starting with very kindly and warmly welcome introduction saying "Howdy everyone"... Literally every lens clip you see... He explains so well in details vividly... Thanks bro.. hope you'll upload more lens reviews... Subscribed!!!
It really is that fast. I just tested it out yesterday and was amazed how nice the lens is. It feels good to use and the sharpness was amazing. I was actually there to test an older 17-40mm with no IS, also at f4. The results were very different hand held due to the extra zoom and the IS.
I really hope you'll be reviewing the RF 70-200mm f4 L IS USM soon. I understand few retailers started shipping it. I'm considering adding it to my landscape kit and really look forward to seeing you put it through its paces. Thanks for all the work you put into your reviews and for their invaluable help to us! All the lens I bought so far have only been those reviewed by you and which have gotten your "HR" or "R" ratings.
I've heard that the price disparity on camera equipment between the US, UK, Canada, etc, is mostly due to tax and import duties. If thats the case, I'd be complaining to your local government instead of the camera manufacturers. Great review, love your videos!
Got the lens. But I've not been able to bring up the manual focus guide as detailed in this video. I switched the lens to manual. What else do I need to do? Thanks
Thanks so much for this, clearly its no better than the average EF versions theres no option but to buy the 24-70 or 28-70 if image quality is important
Hi Christopher. If setting this lens at 50mm and 35mm focal lengths, and then to the same settings as 35mm f1.8 and 50mm f1.8 (nifty fifty) prime lenses, say at F 8, shooting a landscape, will the 24-105 f4L yield a better image quality than the budget prime lenses? Same question for portraits too, at say, F4, please. I have a Canon R8 and own the two prime lenses.
Nice consideration given to filmmakers here. This lens looks to be quite viable for cinematography, and only a small fraction of the cost of a cine lens
Really enjoyed your video, it's informative and spot on with what I wanted to know. In my opinion the ef works just as good but it might not be serviceable in 3 yrs or so years. I think the better choice is the much more expensive rf glass is a safer bet, for longevity.
Hi Chris, I would like to know how did you enable the focus distance guide (minute 3:24 ) when using manual focus (not talking about the focus guide I mean the focus distance bar you can see bellow the white box) Thanks a lot!
@@christopherfrost Thanks a lot for answering me! It seems that focus discante is not available on my lenses (Canon EF 50mm f1.4 USM and Sigma 17 50 f2.8) Too bad...
I got this lens and I’ve been struggling with closeup shots. I was about to send it to lab to check it but I see that you also report it is not that sharp at f4
What I want to know is how does it compare to my Sigma 24-105 f/4 Art lens, but I believe the sigma is supposed to be a bit sharper than the EF version, so I guess the same would apply here given that you say the EF & RF perform similarly
Hi. Sorry for my bad english. But, I work as football videomaker and I have a 24-105 II. Its bad when I make the zoom and The image turn less lighter in 1 point. I would know if the RF 24-105 was the same thing, with less light at the movement at the zoom. Please, help me
Hey Chris! I got a copy of this lens today and it rattles quite noticable when in autofocus. I thought these lenses were completely silent Anyone knows if this is normal or not?
@christopherfrost I follow you channel with high interest and am always impressed about your review and functional showcase. I do have a question, not sure if you easily could anwer this, but. After switching over to the Canon R system (R6), right now I am still working with my Tamron 24-70 f2.8 G2 lens. I do like this lens very much and I am happy about the image quality. I am a bit less happy with the extra weight and length due to the usage of the RF to EF mount adapter. I wonder, is going forward from the Tamron G2 to the Canon RF 24-105 f4 a step forwarth, even while you loose a stop of light. Do you think it is possible to give any opinoin about this question? I do appriciate any comment! Bless you and all the best
I tried an f4 old Canon L lens on a aps-c camera and found the lens quite dark and not too sharp. Probably, it is because this lens is not for a aps-c camera where it becomes like f6-6.4. Anyway I was amazed how this lens performs in the video on a ff camera.
Just remember that when you are using the ef adapter, the adapter is not weather sealed 😕 that's why I'm aiming for the rf lenses, instead of the ef with adapter.
@@bamsemh1 I don't think you have 'talked with canon' [sic], because I am literally looking at my EF adaptor in front of me as I type this reply, and it has a big, lovely, rubber weather-sealing gasket around the edge where it adapts onto the camera. You can see it for yourself if you look at my video review of the EOS R at the 6:05 point. I've just touched it and played with the rubber. Also, Canon's official website states that their EF to EOS R adaptors are weather sealed. So, either you're making things up, or you're very confused.
@@bamsemh1 I don't think you have 'talked with canon' [sic], because I am literally looking at my EF adaptor in front of me as I type this reply, and it has a big, lovely, rubber weather-sealing gasket around the edge where it adapts onto the camera. You can see it for yourself if you look at my video review of the EOS R at the 6:05 point. I've just touched it and played with the rubber. Also, Canon's official website states that their EF to EOS R adaptors are weather sealed. So, either you're making things up, or you're very confused.
@@christopherfrost feel free to show me videos that tells us that the adapter is weather sealed. Oh, you can't? 😊 Well, that's why I contacted Canon, and they confirmed that it isn't weather sealed! Feel free to give them a call, if you still believe it is 😉 I've done my part, and I got my answers from the company itself.
Judging by the flare test looks like this lens could produce some good sunstars, alot of times that bright light is just a white blob but saw some spiking here. I know the review of the wide angle 14-35 RF showed some amazing results for them, wondering if this captures anything similar...
USA roads Really enjoyed new thing that you did in this review when you showed sharpness of 24mm 50mm 105mm in the center of the image one after another without zooming in effect, small thing but was better in my humble opinion
Finally this review comes out. I was about to do my own testing. I got the EOS-R with the 24-105 kit lens for my new job. Super sharp. Your lens reviews are awesome. Test the RF 35mm f1.8 macro IS STM next =]
I have one question in my mind, i can only affort one lens, like run and gun lens. So according to you which is the sharpest of ... 1st canon 24 105 f4 rf 2nd fuji 16 80 f4 3rd sony 24 105 f4 On the baises of the best lens i will be abble to decide between this three camera systems..
Really need help with this My Ef 24-70 lens is broken. The repair is around 600€ I mostly use the canon R5 with the adapter and this lens and sometimes my RF 35mm I've been researching and I'd like to know what you think is the best option: Buy canon RF 85mm F2 and the new RF 16mm (since I already have the RF 35mm) or Just buy the RF 24-105 f4 lens (everybody seems to love this lens) The difference between the two options is just 100€ I can't decide between this 2 options. What would you do? Also which lenses do you think have the best quality and durability? Thank you ❤️
Chris I am wondering when you say that this Canon lens is better than Sony FE 24-105 do you mean the in lens IS or the quality and sharpness? How would you compare the two when it comes to the image quality and colour please?
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Genuinely I love that any time I want to research a lens a Christopher frost video is ALWAYS at the top and the familiarity has made me think “I hope Christopher made a video about this lens” and not once have I been disappointed! You’re doing photography Jesus’ work Christopher ❤️
Me too! It’s very handy
The only lens reviews I trust, thanks again Chris :)
Totally agree. Looking forward to more reviews..
That's 100% true bro❤️
I have to agree with you!
Exactly! And that is why I signed up to his Patreon account for monthly donation. I really appreciate the work that he puts into his reviews. He addresses the new versions AND the old versions to help us make our lens buying decisions. Love it!!
The only truly unbiased review that mentioned the hazy image quality when close to minimum focus distance wide open (and up to about 1 meter focus distance in my experience) Subscribed immediately!
Chris, I love listening to your English. You choose nice words with very nice vocabulary. Your accent also sounds beautiful.
I am using my "old" EF glas with the EF-2-RF mount adapter with the control ring. So I have this feature also to my "old" EF and EF-S lenses. They are working pretty well on my EOS RP and R7. And my EF L lenses are performing very good on the R mirrorless system with the adapter. Thank you for your work for testing all this (for me Canon) lenses!!!
Thanks as always, Christopher! My 24-105 EF was my absolute favorite, go-to, walkaround lens for most applications. Having finally moved to mirrorless (R5 and R6 Mk II), it was a no-brainer to add the RF version to my bag (once I got my 100-500 and 200-800 lenses, that is). The 24-105 RF just came today, and I'm really looking forward to putting it through its paces!
Please dont change the way you reviewe in the future like some other youtubers. Your doing so great. These type of reviews are the best man. Oneday you should reach more than a million subs. Good luck!
I alway look forward to the zoom in to the center of the test chart and then to the corner. 🤣
Some nice taste in movies i see. Any film made by Neil Breen is a masterpiece of entertainment!
Pure Breenius.
the best lenses review on the youtube!! with love from Greece!! i have this lens! is absolute stunning for my EOS R
A blooming lovely review, no one else pointed out the accurate sharpness result of this lens, long awaited review mate, God bless you!
I always love the fact that you prioritise performance and price range.
great! honest unbiased review with tests, but more importantly your reasoned opinion. This is the one i wanted in my anticipated switch from Nikon to Canon, unless I look at it's lighter weight brother.
I got one of the old EF 24-105/4 kit'd with my 5D mk2 back when that camera was launched. It's the only lens I've ever abused. I once managed to drop it by not having closed my camera bag and standing up, it fell out and landed on the sidewalk. It still works 100% but the filter screw thread got FUBAR bent. I've always been really impressed with my little 24-105 that it's still alive and kicking and I've since (knock on wood) never done something that stupid to my gear.
Thank you so so so much for getting the R camera, I got mine last month and love it! I’m really looking forward to seeing your reviews on the RF 2.8 lenses canon has coming later this year, again thank you for doing RF camera lenses!
I bought one of these for my wife. She uses it on her EOS RP. The focus speed on this lens is amazing. I have an EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L II that we used on her RP via the adapter and the focus speed on that lens isn't nearly as fast as this lens. Its also lightweight.
We bought it pre-owned. We buy most of our Canon products either pre-owned or Canon refurbished. We save tons of $$$$$.
You are the best photograph expert on youtube. I love your stile and diction. With love from MOLDOVA !
Cool, Moldova!
I'd hardly call him an expert, he just talks about cameras and lenses.
Christopher, thanks for another superb lens review. No one else comes close to your testing! Jay
Anticipating your RF 50mm review.
F 1.2 test chart hype!
Thank you for comparing the IQ between the RF and EF models. I have the EF version and was curios if it was worth spending the money on the RF version. This review was very helpful. Thank you.
the most trustworthy lens reviewer, great work!!!
I really really appreciate your reviews. I have been watching several while considering my next gear purchase. Thank you Christopher :)
Absolutely fantastic review of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4 lens. I was looking whole the RUclips community for someone like this guys to do these review biaselessly. Thanks #Chris thanks for being there.
Good review! I received this lens together with the R5 the day before Christmas.
Glad RUclips suggested this video, I'm about to spend some serious money and your review helps a lot.
Nicely done mate! Thanks a lot i learned quite a bit here. Bought my EOS R this weekend with the KIT lens and cant wait to test it. Cheers from Germany
Super keen for your review on the RF 35mm & 24-240mm! Thanks for this Christopher - well done.
Check out my channel, they're right there :-)
The fact every image in this review was taken with a "kit" lens demonstrates just how versatile this lens is. Honestly beautiful bokeh from an f/4 zoom.
dude, L lens's are NOT "kit" lens's.
@@beezymeech what do you call a lens that’s bundled with a camera body at a discount? I believe the overwhelming majority of photographers would call that…a “kit lens”. Haha the EF and RF 24-105 lenses have often been referred to as kit lenses for professional and semi professional bodies. I got my RF 24-105 included with my EOS R.
@@kevindiossi The STM ones are the kit lenses, they cost $300. This one costs $1300.
Whenever I search lens review in RUclips... There's always a top recommendation of a guy always saying and starting with very kindly and warmly welcome introduction saying "Howdy everyone"... Literally every lens clip you see... He explains so well in details vividly... Thanks bro.. hope you'll upload more lens reviews... Subscribed!!!
You're my go-to guy for lens reviews. great summary and analysis
The best lens review channel on the internet!
This review was enough for me on both the Lens Camera combo (kit) Thanks for your reviews. I bought the kit a few weeks ago.
Just love Canon lenses. Hoping for a competitive body soon.
3:33 Jeez! I thought the auto-focus test was in fast forward.
It's blazing fast.
It really is that fast. I just tested it out yesterday and was amazed how nice the lens is. It feels good to use and the sharpness was amazing. I was actually there to test an older 17-40mm with no IS, also at f4. The results were very different hand held due to the extra zoom and the IS.
Perfect video, pretty amazing the way you apply in live all the exemples.
I really hope you'll be reviewing the RF 70-200mm f4 L IS USM soon. I understand few retailers started shipping it.
I'm considering adding it to my landscape kit and really look forward to seeing you put it through its paces.
Thanks for all the work you put into your reviews and for their invaluable help to us! All the lens I bought so far have only been those reviewed by you and which have gotten your "HR" or "R" ratings.
This Man, ‘Christopher Frost,’ comes “Highly Recommended !!! “
Another well done Review. Thanks for your work and Knowledge! Best! ✌✌✌👍🇬🇧 🇺🇸😊
I bought this for my eos r. It is utterly amazing on every level.
make it simple, elegant, subtle voice, very very nice review in deed.
Yayy!!! Finally. I probably won't buy into the RF system but sure as hell love listening to you.
wow, the image quality & color results from R & this lens are amazing!
I don't have the RF but actually the kit lens is the one I use the most (24-105) despite having so many more lenses
Thank you Chris. Just bought this lens - your video made the decision easy.
Thank you for "not telling me" about the gray market websites ;) great video, Chris! I love watching these videos, even though I use Nikon lol!
I'm new to photography. What does he mean by gray market?
03:30 dear Chris ist the manual Fokus helping tool on every rf includes ? Nice for only manual lenses
i have ef 24-105 at 90-105... sharpness keeps dropping. So good to see the RF type results
Great review as usual, Chris! Minor error: at 7:20 you said "barrel" instead of "pin cushion" for the distortion at 105mm.
Ooops! Well spotted
1:44 8:29 I love these pictures, beautiful landscape.
My ef lense (mark 1) is not sharp enough and shows ca at any aperture. Probably my worst lense. Hopefully I can have the rf one day!
Neil Breen film... nice. :D
Great review, as always, Christopher!
At the 7:20 mark you referred to the 105mm f/4 setting as having barrel distortion, but it sure looks like pincushion to me. Anyway, very nice review.
Thanks you sir! Just picked up the EOS R5, this bad boy lens and the nifty fifty 1.8. Working my way up to the big boy f/2 28-70
I've heard that the price disparity on camera equipment between the US, UK, Canada, etc, is mostly due to tax and import duties. If thats the case, I'd be complaining to your local government instead of the camera manufacturers. Great review, love your videos!
Do you recommend RF 24-200 mm + body instead of the 24-105 f4 kit lens for Canon R6 II?
It's the first time that i hear somebody has such a charming soft R letter pronunciation.
Wondering how it would be with the R6ii 🤔
Got the lens. But I've not been able to bring up the manual focus guide as detailed in this video. I switched the lens to manual. What else do I need to do? Thanks
Zoomed in you said at 105 the lens demonstrated barrel but it displayed pin cushion.
Thanks so much for this, clearly its no better than the average EF versions theres no option but to buy the 24-70 or 28-70 if image quality is important
Have you noticed any clicking noises when in servo mode?
Now I'm waiting to see your review on the 2.8 version
Hi Christopher. If setting this lens at 50mm and 35mm focal lengths, and then to the same settings as 35mm f1.8 and 50mm f1.8 (nifty fifty) prime lenses, say at F 8, shooting a landscape, will the 24-105 f4L yield a better image quality than the budget prime lenses? Same question for portraits too, at say, F4, please. I have a Canon R8 and own the two prime lenses.
Nice consideration given to filmmakers here. This lens looks to be quite viable for cinematography, and only a small fraction of the cost of a cine lens
Can you hear the auto focusing noise? I do for my new 24-105 F4. Is this normal or not. Look forward to your reply. Thanks.
Really enjoyed your video, it's informative and spot on with what I wanted to know. In my opinion the ef works just as good but it might not be serviceable in 3 yrs or so years. I think the better choice is the much more expensive rf glass is a safer bet, for longevity.
Great and consistent review. Thank you. Although I still have no motivation to switch from EF to RF system. Haha
Do you find this lens wobble a bit inside? I hear it has something to do with IS system. Not sure if this is normal behaviour.
Hi Chris, I would like to know how did you enable the focus distance guide (minute 3:24 ) when using manual focus (not talking about the focus guide I mean the focus distance bar you can see bellow the white box)
Thanks a lot!
It just comes up automatically on my Canon EOS R. Try pressing the display button
@@christopherfrost Thanks a lot for answering me! It seems that focus discante is not available on my lenses (Canon EF 50mm f1.4 USM and Sigma 17 50 f2.8) Too bad...
+1 my camera is R6 mark ii
I has Canon ever explained why their products cost more in the UK than the US? Great review, as usual.
Somebody on RUclips recently blamed Brexit...
I got this lens and I’ve been struggling with closeup shots. I was about to send it to lab to check it but I see that you also report it is not that sharp at f4
What I want to know is how does it compare to my Sigma 24-105 f/4 Art lens, but I believe the sigma is supposed to be a bit sharper than the EF version, so I guess the same would apply here given that you say the EF & RF perform similarly
2:08 what specifically makes it much better than the Sony?
A good lens all-round, but wow that AF speed tho...
Hi. Sorry for my bad english. But, I work as football videomaker and I have a 24-105 II. Its bad when I make the zoom and The image turn less lighter in 1 point. I would know if the RF 24-105 was the same thing, with less light at the movement at the zoom. Please, help me
idk why but I giggled too much seeing that dog (1:56) running
Hey Chris! I got a copy of this lens today and it rattles quite noticable when in autofocus. I thought these lenses were completely silent
Anyone knows if this is normal or not?
Fantastic video again Chris.
The only problem now is that i need to find the budget for the eos r and that lens.
How does the corner sharpness of this lens compare to the RF 24mm 1.8 Macro at typical landscape apertures?
You should include a picture of the old brick building in the sharpness chart montage, just for old time's sake.
He moved
@christopherfrost I follow you channel with high interest and am always impressed about your review and functional showcase.
I do have a question, not sure if you easily could anwer this, but. After switching over to the Canon R system (R6), right now I am still working with my Tamron 24-70 f2.8 G2 lens. I do like this lens very much and I am happy about the image quality.
I am a bit less happy with the extra weight and length due to the usage of the RF to EF mount adapter.
I wonder, is going forward from the Tamron G2 to the Canon RF 24-105 f4 a step forwarth, even while you loose a stop of light.
Do you think it is possible to give any opinoin about this question? I do appriciate any comment!
Bless you and all the best
7:30 Chris (or Christopher, not sure which you prefer!) are you a Felix Kaijalburger fan by any chance? LOL Love that Kneel Brene reference haha
Your lens reviews are so good I won't buy a lens you have not done a review for.
I tried an f4 old Canon L lens on a aps-c camera and found the lens quite dark and not too sharp. Probably, it is because this lens is not for a aps-c camera where it becomes like f6-6.4. Anyway I was amazed how this lens performs in the video on a ff camera.
Damn. Can't wait for that 28-70 f2! Or really, any other video of yours
Liad Sagi yeah I’ll love for him to do the 28-70 f2 😁
Just remember that when you are using the ef adapter, the adapter is not weather sealed 😕 that's why I'm aiming for the rf lenses, instead of the ef with adapter.
The adaptor IS weather sealed
@@christopherfrost no. I have talked with canon about it. And you don't see any rubber(or that) on the mount.
@@bamsemh1 I don't think you have 'talked with canon' [sic], because I am literally looking at my EF adaptor in front of me as I type this reply, and it has a big, lovely, rubber weather-sealing gasket around the edge where it adapts onto the camera. You can see it for yourself if you look at my video review of the EOS R at the 6:05 point. I've just touched it and played with the rubber. Also, Canon's official website states that their EF to EOS R adaptors are weather sealed. So, either you're making things up, or you're very confused.
@@bamsemh1 I don't think you have 'talked with canon' [sic], because I am literally looking at my EF adaptor in front of me as I type this reply, and it has a big, lovely, rubber weather-sealing gasket around the edge where it adapts onto the camera. You can see it for yourself if you look at my video review of the EOS R at the 6:05 point. I've just touched it and played with the rubber. Also, Canon's official website states that their EF to EOS R adaptors are weather sealed. So, either you're making things up, or you're very confused.
@@christopherfrost feel free to show me videos that tells us that the adapter is weather sealed. Oh, you can't? 😊 Well, that's why I contacted Canon, and they confirmed that it isn't weather sealed! Feel free to give them a call, if you still believe it is 😉 I've done my part, and I got my answers from the company itself.
Judging by the flare test looks like this lens could produce some good sunstars, alot of times that bright light is just a white blob but saw some spiking here. I know the review of the wide angle 14-35 RF showed some amazing results for them, wondering if this captures anything similar...
USA roads
Really enjoyed new thing that you did in this review when you showed sharpness of 24mm 50mm 105mm in the center of the image one after another without zooming in effect, small thing but was better in my humble opinion
Dear Chris, can u make a video compare the RF 24-105/4 vs EF 24-105II (Mark 2)
Tks you
Where does one find one of these gray market websites? Do they ship to the EU?
Could you do a review on the RF 15-35mm f2.8L IS vs 16-35mm f4L IS .
What's the difference between RF 24-105 USM and STM kit lenses?
Finally this review comes out. I was about to do my own testing. I got the EOS-R with the 24-105 kit lens for my new job. Super sharp. Your lens reviews are awesome. Test the RF 35mm f1.8 macro IS STM next =]
I'm testing that lens at the moment and I love it!
I'm happy with my EF 24-105mm F4L. I won't be upgrading to the RF version.
near perfect if not the perfect kit lens
Can I use this lens on my Full frame Camera Cannon 6D Mark II
No it's a RF mount
6:25 looks like a fairly huge difference to me
RF 50 review comming ? Thanks in advance
I have one question in my mind, i can only affort one lens, like run and gun lens. So according to you which is the sharpest of ...
1st canon 24 105 f4 rf
2nd fuji 16 80 f4
3rd sony 24 105 f4
On the baises of the best lens i will be abble to decide between this three camera systems..
Canon 24-105 is the sharpest
Really need help with this
My Ef 24-70 lens is broken. The repair is around 600€
I mostly use the canon R5 with the adapter and this lens and sometimes my RF 35mm
I've been researching and I'd like to know what you think is the best option:
Buy canon RF 85mm F2 and the new RF 16mm
(since I already have the RF 35mm)
or
Just buy the RF 24-105 f4 lens
(everybody seems to love this lens)
The difference between the two options is just 100€
I can't decide between this 2 options. What would you do?
Also which lenses do you think have the best quality and durability?
Thank you ❤️
New lens design is awesome inc corners..
Chris I am wondering when you say that this Canon lens is better than Sony FE 24-105 do you mean the in lens IS or the quality and sharpness? How would you compare the two when it comes to the image quality and colour please?
Hi Chris, nice video. You should do the RF 35 prime...