Eos R. Gen 1 Canon mirrorless. I sold mine and went back to my EF system with the eos 5dsr. Have now gone back to Eos R with the R8 and the 24-105 f4L and the 100-500 RF L.
Totally agreed, super versatile lens and perfect for 95% of our work other than stuff that requires lowest light or smallest DOF. Great for events, headshots, portraits, products. I mean I shoot a lot of events that are low light and get fine photos out of it at high ISO's, otherwise pop on a flash and good to go in any situation. I was shooting the after party of a school graduation outside 11pm, pitch black out, pop on an EL-1 flash and photos all were awesome (EL-1 is a real game changer, best on-cam flash EVER on any system).
Thank you for excellent review👍.I have rf 24-105 f4L my go to lens for travel/family vacation pair with rf 35 f1.8 and i have rf 28-70 f2L for portrait and wedding works😊
There was a time when f4 was considered too slow for a lot of professional use. That was back when the original 5D, for example, was best not used beyond 1600 ISO. Today's cameras offer several stops more of clean image quality, making f4 lens absolutely practical. Need a more shallow DOF? A cheap prime will cover those situations, and do it better than the expensive 2.8 zoom.
I have to agree! If you are just starting off photography, this lens gives you great opportunity to grow as photographer. It stays on my camera 90% of the time.
It's such an excellent travel lens. Whenever I'm going somewhere and I don't quite know what I'll find there, this lens nearly always has the right focal length for the job.
Great video. I also find that it's the lens that I use the most. When I bring it and the RF 50mm 1.2 I have everything I need for environmental portraits and most landscape photography.
Yes! This lens is a great lens, that I would recommend for travel too. I personally went with the RF 24-70 2.8 though, since I shoot a lot of events and also video, where I want to be able to get a decent amount of bokeh.
That was really helpful, thank you. I also own an EOS R, with a couple of prime lenses for the 14mm and 50mm focal lengths respectively. To be honest, because in addition I use Fuji and Olympus equipment, not to mention my trusty 5D and 5D3, the EOS R has not really found its true role thus far. But I have kept an eye on the retail prices of this particular universal zoom and I agree it would be ideal as a walkaround option. Especially as it packs away so conveniently in a smallish bag, as you demonstrated. Today is my birthday and I may finally decide to splurge on what would be a reliable, long-term purchase that would definitely be put to good use.
Came with my R6 and for now I am resisting the urge to add a bunch of glass. I'm going to stick with this lens, see what it can do, and if wait to see if I hit any limitations. A "nifty-fifty" seems like a no-brainer and the 35 f/1.8 seems like more of the same, but I'm really trying to keep things simple and the bag light. For now this lens is working out.
@@dashas5198 portraiture, the EF 35 f2 was my favorite all around lens, this iteration is not as sharp and it doesn't handle blues very well. I would have initially thought it was the image sensor on the r6, but that hasn't been my experience. My 85 1.2, 50 1.2 , and 24-70 2.8 all do blues exceptionally well.
@@lacelavender Interesting, thanks for the information. Ah I see, the Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM you mentioned is in a similar price range with the rf 35mm f1.8, but still behaves better for you. I suppose that either goes to show upgrading to rf from ef isn't necessarily a good idea, or your lens might've had something off about it (I'd bet the quality of the cheaper lenses varies more). Have you tested whether the 35mm focal length on your rf 24-70 produces better results?
I used to have Canon R and RF24-105 f4 L combo. Now I have it on R6. Great all around lens providing grate images and very important for me it's not heavy as others which makes this lens very versatile. And f4 is nothing to worry about with R6 body which have IBIS and one can bump up ISO to 10K and still producing great images.
@Len F thanks for your answer! I've got the R6 on order, found a nice used one. Looking to buy the 24-105 f4 used as well, but people don't seem to let them go 😄 very few offers on the 2nd hand market
@@crystallised88 I purchased my from Canon Online store in December with all discount applies. For refurbished R6 body I payed $1700 and for refurbished RF24-105 f4 L $720. The camera and the lens arrived in pristine condition.
I just don't see the point, even with portraits you'd need to stop down to get nose to ear focus and with RF the brightness of the lens just doesn't matter anymore
Really good review man . You we're the closest one to my question . I'm bouncing in between 24-70 and 24-105 . I have the 24-70 EF one but want to move to RF
Thank you! For events I would definitely choose the RF 24-70mm f2.8. However for general purpose for me is the 24-105mm f4 the king. It's good enough even for some paid work.
Hi Lukas, nice review I just want to buy Canon Eos RP + RF 24-105 f4-7.1 STM with RF 50mm and EF 85mm 1.8 OR other option is to buy only RF 24-105 F4. I mostly shoot weddings as a candid photographer. Thanks.
How is the dust sealing on this particular RF lens? I've heard photographers having a nightmare with Tamron and Sigma's current 24-70 due to dust getting sucked in to the lens due to poor sealing on the extending lens barrel. To your knowledge, does the RF F4 24-105mm L have a filter between the extending barrel and the main barrel to prevent dust from getting sucked into the lens? Or in your extensive use of the lens, have you detected any issues with dust [long term use]?
I had to actually send my lens to canon to have them clean a dust speck that got under the front element. They cleaned it for free, I got it back in about a week and has been clean since. That was several months ago and I use it a lot.
I use my RF 24-105mm F4 daily for more than a year and there's no dust inside the lens. I change lenses very often, so I suppose the sealing does its job correctly.
If you have a chance to try it somewhere it would be very helpful. However you would loose some depth of field with f4. Anyway I think the af will be much faster with native RF mount. I haven’t tried it with your lens, but the autofocus on the RF mount is generally much faster then the AF of any Canon EF mount lens used with the adapter.
I. Love. This. Lens. I shoot weddings, both photo and video. On my R6, I go handheld and can hybrid shoot between photo and video and get amazing stuff on both ends. Of course there are better lenses, but for the price, this lens is stacked with features and so incredibly versatile.
Sorry - slightly unrelated question please: what's the exact model of that camera bag? I'm waiting for delivery of my Canon R5 with that lens and would like to get a camera bag for it. I'm guessing it's LowePro Adventura 140..... Is it? Thanks in advance.
I have this lens and I don't use it anymore. It's not really sharp compared to the other RF zoom lenses. It's just ok. Also because the front element protrudes dust has gotten into my lens which I'm not happy about. But I enjoyed your review. Thanks for taking the time to make it.
Constant aperture vs variable. Weather sealed L lens vs no weather sealing. High-grade plastic and solid metal mount made in Japan vs all plastic made in China.
@@ralphsaad8637 if you need to shoot a mountain then use crop mode For a 50mm view. Same as the eye which would represent reality and youll get the mountain..
@@sticky8579 I have a 50mm lens and I carry it with me everywhere. This along with a Tamron 15-30mm f2.8 and a 24-105mm ef ii. 90% of the time however, I'll be using the 24-105mm as it covers the 50mm range along with wider angles and tighter shots when needed. For someone who shoots landscape mainly, a 50mm just won't be enough to get the necessary reach for my shot as well as my target composition. If I have to go even wider, I will reach out to the 15-30mm, but will rarely ever find myself using the 50mm which I leave for portraits or street photography.
@@thisisbug if you ment by parfocal that focus stays the same while zooming, than yes - I tested yesterday. The lens keeps its focus when you rotate the zoom ring
Ummm I have this lens and will be getting rid of it because it is real soft and I'm sick and tired of out of focus photos on my R6Mkii... I get good photos with my 14-35 RF f4 and my 70-200 f4 and my 85 f2 and my 50 f1.2, so it isn't the camera. Canon should be embarassed with this "L" lens.
@@Chrysotil Thanks... Glad someone else is having the same issue. I converted my RP to a full spectrum IR Camera and is one of the best decisions I've done! My 14-35 is almost permanently with that camera. Saving my money to move to Hasselblad.
Eos R. Gen 1 Canon mirrorless. I sold mine and went back to my EF system with the eos 5dsr. Have now gone back to Eos R with the R8 and the 24-105 f4L and the 100-500 RF L.
Totally agreed, super versatile lens and perfect for 95% of our work other than stuff that requires lowest light or smallest DOF. Great for events, headshots, portraits, products. I mean I shoot a lot of events that are low light and get fine photos out of it at high ISO's, otherwise pop on a flash and good to go in any situation. I was shooting the after party of a school graduation outside 11pm, pitch black out, pop on an EL-1 flash and photos all were awesome (EL-1 is a real game changer, best on-cam flash EVER on any system).
Thank you for excellent review👍.I have rf 24-105 f4L my go to lens for travel/family vacation pair with rf 35 f1.8 and i have rf 28-70 f2L for portrait and wedding works😊
Thanks helpful ! I'm gonna buy it
There was a time when f4 was considered too slow for a lot of professional use. That was back when the original 5D, for example, was best not used beyond 1600 ISO. Today's cameras offer several stops more of clean image quality, making f4 lens absolutely practical. Need a more shallow DOF? A cheap prime will cover those situations, and do it better than the expensive 2.8 zoom.
I have to agree! If you are just starting off photography, this lens gives you great opportunity to grow as photographer. It stays on my camera 90% of the time.
how's vignetting @ 24mm?
@@mandofan2616 never heard any of that or noticed such thing. I have lens correction on all the time. Maybe that’s the reason.
Very good review Lukas with plenty of pictures. This makes a real description. I just copied the images for faster comparison and decision making.
I will always miss my 18-200 I used as my "everything" lens on my Nikon, but very much considering getting this lens for the R5.
It's such an excellent travel lens. Whenever I'm going somewhere and I don't quite know what I'll find there, this lens nearly always has the right focal length for the job.
That’s why I love it so much for photography and video as well, even for client work
Thanks. I'm considering buying a rf 24-105 for events and portraits.
Great video. I also find that it's the lens that I use the most. When I bring it and the RF 50mm 1.2 I have everything I need for environmental portraits and most landscape photography.
Yes! This lens is a great lens, that I would recommend for travel too. I personally went with the RF 24-70 2.8 though, since I shoot a lot of events and also video, where I want to be able to get a decent amount of bokeh.
I have to agree, for events is the RF 24-70mm f2.8 far better option.
@@lukashodon2939 But the F2.8 24-70 is *heavier* and it stops @ 70mm. The 105mm provides better reach in addition to it's compression.
That was really helpful, thank you. I also own an EOS R, with a couple of prime lenses for the 14mm and 50mm focal lengths respectively. To be honest, because in addition I use Fuji and Olympus equipment, not to mention my trusty 5D and 5D3, the EOS R has not really found its true role thus far. But I have kept an eye on the retail prices of this particular universal zoom and I agree it would be ideal as a walkaround option. Especially as it packs away so conveniently in a smallish bag, as you demonstrated. Today is my birthday and I may finally decide to splurge on what would be a reliable, long-term purchase that would definitely be put to good use.
Awesome reviewing ! Your review is persuasive, I'll immediately buy it !
Haha thank you! It’s just my experience. maybe try it before buying if you have the opportunity
Those are incredible photos you have there,beautiful
Thanks so much
Thank you. Informative video. Looking forward to your 2nd video review of this lens.
Thanks a lot! Hopefully, it will be ready soon.
Excellent video one of the best reviews for this lens thanks for sharing.
I LOVE this lens on my R6. Such a fantastic lens.
Totaly agree!
I am totally agree with you 👍 nice video ✌️
Thank you! Glad you liked it!
I’m your 500th subscriber! Remember me when you hit 500,000! Great video! Thanks
Hey man, thanks a lot! I’m glad you like the content and I made a note about you! :))
Very clear and precise review. Helps a lot!
Glad it was helpful!
Thanks... very helpful.
Came with my R6 and for now I am resisting the urge to add a bunch of glass. I'm going to stick with this lens, see what it can do, and if wait to see if I hit any limitations. A "nifty-fifty" seems like a no-brainer and the 35 f/1.8 seems like more of the same, but I'm really trying to keep things simple and the bag light. For now this lens is working out.
Skip the 35 1.8. it's not as good as the 50
@@lacelavender Oh? Why so? Which situations did you try it out in?
@@dashas5198 portraiture, the EF 35 f2 was my favorite all around lens, this iteration is not as sharp and it doesn't handle blues very well. I would have initially thought it was the image sensor on the r6, but that hasn't been my experience. My 85 1.2, 50 1.2 , and 24-70 2.8 all do blues exceptionally well.
@@lacelavender Interesting, thanks for the information. Ah I see, the Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM you mentioned is in a similar price range with the rf 35mm f1.8, but still behaves better for you. I suppose that either goes to show upgrading to rf from ef isn't necessarily a good idea, or your lens might've had something off about it (I'd bet the quality of the cheaper lenses varies more). Have you tested whether the 35mm focal length on your rf 24-70 produces better results?
I used to have Canon R and RF24-105 f4 L combo. Now I have it on R6. Great all around lens providing grate images and very important for me it's not heavy as others which makes this lens very versatile. And f4 is nothing to worry about with R6 body which have IBIS and one can bump up ISO to 10K and still producing great images.
Have you noticed much difference in image quality using that lense on R and R6 ? appart from the low light performance
@@crystallised88 Yes, on R6 it's noticeable sharper even using tripod on R and taking picture hand held with R6. But only if you zoom image in 100%.
@Len F thanks for your answer! I've got the R6 on order, found a nice used one. Looking to buy the 24-105 f4 used as well, but people don't seem to let them go 😄 very few offers on the 2nd hand market
@@crystallised88 I purchased my from Canon Online store in December with all discount applies. For refurbished R6 body I payed $1700 and for refurbished RF24-105 f4 L $720. The camera and the lens arrived in pristine condition.
Nice video, very well explained! Thank you!
Thank you, too!
Great info, thanks
Glad it was helpful!
nice video... btw camera gear used to capture this video? technically perfect in my eyes
Thank you Marek! I appreciate your honesty! I use Canon R6 and at the video I used godox sl60 with godox softbox
Nice review ❤
Nice video. Thanks.
Thank you too!
I just wish they did a faster version of this (e.g. f2.8) and at the same price :-)
Wake up XD
I just don't see the point, even with portraits you'd need to stop down to get nose to ear focus and with RF the brightness of the lens just doesn't matter anymore
hm.. nice idea, but seems impossible to me :))
Really good review man . You we're the closest one to my question . I'm bouncing in between 24-70 and 24-105 . I have the 24-70 EF one but want to move to RF
Thank you! For events I would definitely choose the RF 24-70mm f2.8. However for general purpose for me is the 24-105mm f4 the king. It's good enough even for some paid work.
I am glad I am not the only one who say "photograph-fyyyyyy".
:D
I can see Peter McKinnon influence in your editing style and in your intro :D
Thanks for the comment, Peter is very good inspiration, so there might be some influence for sure :D
Thank you, I almost sell this lense. Yes you are right. This is an excellent lense.
Hi Lukas, nice review I just want to buy Canon Eos RP + RF 24-105 f4-7.1 STM with RF 50mm and EF 85mm 1.8 OR other option is to buy only RF 24-105 F4. I mostly shoot weddings as a candid photographer. Thanks.
3:09 What software is this?
It’s Capture One
It's sadly sold out everywhere here in Germany, I'd really like to get one of these...
How is the dust sealing on this particular RF lens? I've heard photographers having a nightmare with Tamron and Sigma's current 24-70 due to dust getting sucked in to the lens due to poor sealing on the extending lens barrel. To your knowledge, does the RF F4 24-105mm L have a filter between the extending barrel and the main barrel to prevent dust from getting sucked into the lens? Or in your extensive use of the lens, have you detected any issues with dust [long term use]?
I had to actually send my lens to canon to have them clean a dust speck that got under the front element. They cleaned it for free, I got it back in about a week and has been clean since. That was several months ago and I use it a lot.
I use my RF 24-105mm F4 daily for more than a year and there's no dust inside the lens. I change lenses very often, so I suppose the sealing does its job correctly.
I don't know which calculation is correct in terms of aps f 2.66×1.5=f 3.99 & full frame
f4 -1.5= 2.5 😅 which is correct ?
Why don’t you have 200,000 subscribers? Excellent videos! Thanks
Thank you!
Oppinions on the L version or the kit lens version that comes with the camera?
I have the eos r and i use the 24-70 2.8 tamron with ef adapter i can't decide if i really want the 24 105 or not
If you have a chance to try it somewhere it would be very helpful. However you would loose some depth of field with f4. Anyway I think the af will be much faster with native RF mount. I haven’t tried it with your lens, but the autofocus on the RF mount is generally much faster then the AF of any Canon EF mount lens used with the adapter.
Softer than the EF version, which isn't that good, the Sigma 24-105 is a much better lens
I. Love. This. Lens. I shoot weddings, both photo and video. On my R6, I go handheld and can hybrid shoot between photo and video and get amazing stuff on both ends. Of course there are better lenses, but for the price, this lens is stacked with features and so incredibly versatile.
Totally agree, for me also the weight is very important factor and this lens sits on the light end.
What about the Tamron lense 24-70 g2 i think that would be a good option what do u think ???
Oppinion on the USM L vs the ISM?
Sorry - slightly unrelated question please: what's the exact model of that camera bag? I'm waiting for delivery of my Canon R5 with that lens and would like to get a camera bag for it. I'm guessing it's LowePro Adventura 140..... Is it? Thanks in advance.
You guessed it right. It's Adventura SH 140 II and the R5 with RF 24-105mm fits in there perfectly.
Nice video 🤙🏻
Thanks ✌
Which one is better for Canon EOS RP 24:105MM USM OR STM ??
Is this the lenses that comes with the R5 kit?
do you use flash light for all this photos ?? great photos mate...
thank you! I used flashes for some of the shots. However, most of my photos are shot in natural light.
Great video, but 70 gr? Must be the lightest lens in the world.
Will this lens fit the cannon m50 mark ii ?
This was one of my first RF lenses, it was nice but lacking in bokeh and lowlight performance, sold it to get an RF 28-70 f2 instead.
the 28-70mm is another league for sure! It can't compare with this one.
I want that lens so bad.
I have this lens and I don't use it anymore. It's not really sharp compared to the other RF zoom lenses. It's just ok. Also because the front element protrudes dust has gotten into my lens which I'm not happy about. But I enjoyed your review. Thanks for taking the time to make it.
Thanks for sharing Vasko, my copy didn't have this issue.
Excuse me, what image editing software are you using, thank you
It’s Capture One
🔥🤙
Isn't the RF 24-105 f/4-7.1 IS STM a better option? It's lighter(almost half the weight) and cheaper.
Constant aperture vs variable. Weather sealed L lens vs no weather sealing. High-grade plastic and solid metal mount made in Japan vs all plastic made in China.
@@tomscott4438 The L version is also sharper still.
Yes its a handy piece if kit however
35mm 1.8 is the lense you would take if you could only take one.
What if you need to shoot a distant mountain? A prime just doesn't make any sense for travelling. You just need a zoom.
@@ralphsaad8637 if you need to shoot a mountain then use crop mode
For a 50mm view.
Same as the eye which would represent reality and youll get the mountain..
@@sticky8579 I have a 50mm lens and I carry it with me everywhere. This along with a Tamron 15-30mm f2.8 and a 24-105mm ef ii. 90% of the time however, I'll be using the 24-105mm as it covers the 50mm range along with wider angles and tighter shots when needed. For someone who shoots landscape mainly, a 50mm just won't be enough to get the necessary reach for my shot as well as my target composition. If I have to go even wider, I will reach out to the 15-30mm, but will rarely ever find myself using the 50mm which I leave for portraits or street photography.
Until we watch another video telling us that we need THAT lens and then another video telling use we need the other lens and so on and so on.
is it parfocal?
Yes, it's parfocal, what is a good thing for both photography and video.
@@lukashodon2939 r u sure its parfocal? i heard otherwise
@@thisisbug if you ment by parfocal that focus stays the same while zooming, than yes - I tested yesterday. The lens keeps its focus when you rotate the zoom ring
🤘🏻✨
👍🏻
You forgot the great panasonic 24-105 f4 its at least as good as the canon
This lens is so basic , basic photos, basic of what it asks of the photographer, basic results .
Ummm I have this lens and will be getting rid of it because it is real soft and I'm sick and tired of out of focus photos on my R6Mkii... I get good photos with my 14-35 RF f4 and my 70-200 f4 and my 85 f2 and my 50 f1.2, so it isn't the camera. Canon should be embarassed with this "L" lens.
I have the same issue on my RP and I'm disappointed by Canon
@@Chrysotil Thanks... Glad someone else is having the same issue. I converted my RP to a full spectrum IR Camera and is one of the best decisions I've done! My 14-35 is almost permanently with that camera.
Saving my money to move to Hasselblad.
💕💕💕👍👍👍✌️
I disagree vehemently
You need just this one lens if you take all your photos between 24 and 105mm.
Stupid thing to say, really.
Panasonic's 20 - 60 is far more useful
Sure, it also a great lens!
"The only lens you need". Also: "just add some lighting equipment"....
You're right - especially in low light situations there are better lenses to choose from.
The Canon EF 24-105 sucked, so if these RF versions are a ‘revised’ much more expensive versions of the EF, no thanks!
How does it "suck"? Care to expand on it? I'm genuinely interested in your opinion of the RF F4 24-105mm L.