I am an airline pilot who flies the 787. I have to say this is very realistic. Some of the "inop" items are a bit surprising but for a flight sim it doesn't really matter much. In real life , of course, there are about 400 things that need to be done from power-up to take-off - he does about 10 of them! Many of these "real world" things can safely be ignored in the "sim" world - initiating the ACARS, verifying the C-of-G and trim, making sure the oil levels are acceptable for flight, etc. One thing I noticed is that the inertia modeling seems way off. There is no way you could intercept the glideslope at 225 knots and slow down without full speedbrakes all the way down. Even with full speedbrakes it's unlikely you'd make the landing. Maybe that's not completely true as I didn't catch what weight the aircraft was programmed at - a very light aircraft might make the landing with 1/2 speedbrake. Essentially you must be at 190-200 knots with at least flap 5 upon G/S intercept and even then you might be using the speedbrake . Take-offs without an accurate trim setting are a really bad idea - lead to tailstrikes, which are multi-million dollar mistakes. Landings in the real aircraft are much more difficult than is shown in this video - mistakes are very expensive. In the real aircraft we use the LNAV, VNAV and HUD on every take-off. There are very good reasons for doing this - all of which involve real-world IFR procedures - the sim does not care if you deviate from protected IFR airspace while real controllers care A LOT. Anyway, looks pretty good - graphics are amazing.
If you are interested I'm starting a BB for simmers to ask questions of real pilots. It would just for fun, and hopefully there will be a range of aircraft types represented.
I fly the 78 as well and as jet lagged as I am now and quite happy to not fly for a few days, I really want to try this sim! I did cringe though at things like arming speed brakes for take off. That kind of thing makes me want to contribute as well, but it's bad enough I came out as being a pilot here. Not really an AW much. Who do you fly for?
This “game” is just incredible with the visuals. My god. Doesn’t look computer. But doesn’t look like it’s artificial. It just looks ‘real’ which I guess until now has been extremely difficult to do for anyone. Their new mapping tech looks incredible.
Ailerons and flaperons on the 787 are much like the F-22 Raptor control surfaces. An insane amount of engineering went into designing and developing the use of the ailerons, flaperons, and speed breaks all at once. I won't dive in too deep about the exact physics but for anyone who is wondering; the reason the raptor, 787, etc use all the surfaces at once is to reduce adverse yaw and to keep the aircraft coordinated at all attitudes during all phases of flight. The fly-by-wire controls are absolutely nuts and is truly and engineering marvel.
@@RydalS You mean the no skill pilot that got his start on IF (remember when he first joined) and is overrated on skill? Yeah no. Hard pass. Edit: I should also add that the kid doesnt actually know an ounce of how to actually fly an aircraft. If you rely on him for knowing how to fly simulators you are being duped by a DA.
I’m going to be honest, my jaw dropped seeing all those computer screens in the cockpit . I’m so used to FSX, used to seeing only one or two NON-interactive screens. Seeing these GIANT and INTERACTIVE computer screens is purely jaw dropping! So cool to see!
QualityWings 787 for P3D/FSX, while not on the level of a PMDG aircraft, is better than this default 787. I hope they port it. FSX's default aircraft are very poor, but the good add-ons are still much better than FS2020 defaults.
With the exception of Aerosoft's A320, I typically only fly the default aircraft so I'm really happy with the level of detail in the new flight models. Can't wait for Tuesday!
@@ortundgaming967 Default aircraft is shit, I don't think you can flight sim with FSX default planes... At least I can't. Aerosoft also, not enough study-level for me. Even old PMDG 737NGX isn't good enough. FSlabs A319/20/21 or PMDG 747 and PMDG 737NGXu are only good enough. Besides that, you need Active Sky Pro, fly on VATSIM, have good airport sceneries because it is not possible to fly with shit default airports, Ground Services X also
@@NextGenGamer1 sounds pretty spoilt to me, for me these defaults seem good enuf, i only need some different types of aircraft. like a dhc otter or so.
My initial thought for the premium deluxe is you're getting 10 more aircraft and 10 more airports for an additional $59.90 if you divide it by 20 you're getting 787 Dreamliner for roughly $2.99. To me that's a pretty good deal for an aircraft like this even if some systems are inop at the moment. Thanks for sharing!
@@marcoantoniomendes6711 For study lvl yes, but for those whom wish for a more causal experience at a lower cost, Asobo should make a default A350 + A380
@@marcoantoniomendes6711 Can’t wait to fly the A350 in this sim it’s gonna be awsome having those spaceship like displays while on an approach in night time.
@@raykrislianggi This is final build, not pre-release. The game is either ready for release or it's not. If they're charging me €69 for the base game I want everything working in it. To see this flawed ideal of we'll fix it later in action look at Bioware's Anthem.
Paul Brennan it’s not the developers fault coz they aren’t the ones saying it, it’s the fans, they keep saying it will get fixed later, but really I don’t think it’s flawed, this is just how default aircraft in flight sims work
Muhammad Ahdal'ula Rayhanfasya that’s true I’ve been waiting so long for this Aircraft.. on the one hand its maybe to complex.. but on the other hand there is the 787 by QualityWings and both aircrafts are pretty similar..
I've watched several of your videos now and I just want to say I love how much you use the chapters features. I don't use it to skip anything, I just love that you use it.
Going by the Livestream Q&A, more airliner features will be added later (including things like seatbelt sign switches etc). They just wanted to focus on core systems for now. Also, liveries are definitely coming!
the core systems of GA aircraft really, the airliners are going to be very wip for a while I'd guess. They are ironing out the autopilot quirks right now, then they'll probably flesh out the airliners more.
Where in the livestream did they ever say that features will be added later like seatbelt sign switches? I have watched the whole q&a and they mentioned that there standard planes will not inculde this stuff because they are not study level! Liveries where mentioned yes.
@@forexample7417 dude you do realize all flight sims on the market released in much worse conditions and had literally a decade to mature, or more? This is not Call of Duty.
I was a passenger on a 787 Dreamliner a little while back with Royal Brunei, flying Melbourne-Brunei-Dubai-London then returned the same route, loved it great crew and great airplane.
I love the Dreamliner, flown on it to the Caribbean many times with TUI in Premium.. it's a gorgeous beast of a plane. Love the window tinting, and the lighting.
that plane flies like a dream, it makes the FSX jets look like absolute garbage. geez I'm so keen to finally get a flight sim upgrade after all these years
So, I was one of those complaining about the Default (I'm actually still complaining). Yesterday, I decided to take the default X-Plane 747 for a ride. What a piece of trash. Default x Default, the msfs wins hands down.
The landing gear might have reached the maximum air pressure so they can’t move up. When this happens in real life you need to slow down so the pressure drops from the moving air, flip the gear up and increase the speed once again.
@Nahoj I really doubt that is the case. In-depth simulation is not exactly the impression I'm getting from the heavies in MSFS. FSLabs would be a different story.
to be fair, for those of us that have worked around it... it very much does sound like that, the spool up and downs are slower, but its very close, this has to due with it being a bleedless ultra high bypass engine... basically it is a giant fan that is driven by a jet engine.
The ramp guy...😂🤣 "Nothing like a blast of jet exhaust in the morning. Sears the lungs and gives you a helluva tan." P.S. The big jets are very much a WiP. Can't wait for some TPD love to hit MSFS. As it is now it's a VFR/GA sim only.
Thats the feeling i got from this as well the a320 with space shuttle engines 1/3rd of the systems inop on most transport aircraft but for a GA sim its still good the large jets are good toys for screwing about tho Asobo knows NOBODY plays the default planes for features they make it usable and leave the detailed stuff for PMDG and flight factor Im happy they just gave us this many planes
john leininger Flight Factor for one, isn’t moving over from what I know, and they are relatively hated. Prepar3d devs I’m sure will be moving over, same for fsx, and their modding community is thriving.
Right above each front window is a heads-up display. You should be able to click on it and it’ll fold down. There may be switches to control it... I’m just guessing. Please do another quick video showing the HUD in action... assuming it works in this build. Beautiful plane!!!! Thanks for sharing this. :-)
Please explain more, just fyi if you dident know rto means rejected takeoff and in the actual plane it will automatically disarm when airborne. On the inside of the gear wheel thing are pads of metal or something as a skid pad if gear is still spinning
It depends on the wheels spinning or not? Why isn't it linked to Weight-On-Wheels, i.e. if there is no weight pushing down on the wheels then logically the aircraft is airborne already.
I'm lucky enough to have been in the flight deck of a 787 and can confirm that yes that is what it looks like. The emersion is pretty much BANG ON accurate
Hugo Bokhorst I think they were referencing the fact that squirrel completely didn’t say anything about it. They were way above the top of the fuselage
@@Jst3r way above top of the fuselage is by design on a 787. Dreamliner wings are sloped upward, they have a heavy dihedral to them. that is not a bug.
I was wondering, if 3rd party devs can have access to the default aircraft and work from there, much like the Zibo 737 for X-Plane 11. Reason I'm thinking of this, is I WANT the graphic details of the default aircraft. I mean, all the knobs are there, except that many of them are inopt.
Quality wings posted in the fourms that they are trying to bring there 787-8,9,10 to the new sim that they made for Fsx and P3d. There quality was pretty close to pmdg with alot of functionality was my fav plane to use in Fsx.
@@planely1263 :( I just hope 3rd party aircraft devs will make their graphics on par if not better than default. I hear some of you say systems depth and realism is more important than graphics, etc. But for me, graphics fidelity is itself "realism". I have seen and bought some study-level a/c for XP - very well done simulation but the graphics? I prefer the default xp.
@@santiagoluib3 yeah I totally agree. I never used XP but most 3rd party addons like pmdg and Quality wings aircraft model graphics were very high quality for the last MSFS from sound, to interior and exterior.
All these bugs with the ILS on both the A320 and 787 worry me a bit. I only fly airliners and prefer to fly in real world weather. Given all these bugs these aircraft can only be flown in nice weather conditions at the moment. I hope they will fix it soon as the rest of the sim is simply stunning. I cannot wait to see what companies like PMDG are going to create.
Love seeing these videos, Squirrel. You know what would be really awesome? If you did a multi-part series of videos explaining the basics of flying planes on this new sim. Things like the simplest way to get from point A to point B (airport to airport) using the navigation equipment; basics of using the autopilot; basics of flying and landing. That sort of thing. Not super in-depth, but just enough to get someone like me with little exp (last time I played Microsoft FSX was YEARS ago at this point) to be able to takeoff from an airport, have a destination in mind, and be able to navigate there and land successfully. Doesn't even need to be on a large aircraft like this, even instructions for a smaller prop plane would be awesome. Maybe there is already someone doing that on youtube, but I feel like you would do a great job at explaining a "crash course" (pun intended) of flying in this new sim. I originally found you on here nearly a year ago from your Euro Truck Sim videos, and seeing you pop back up on my feed playing a game I have highly anticipated since finding out about is really awesome. Thanks for all the great content!
Starting engines on stand with no beacon on and all ground crew and vehicles surrounding the aircraft, thug life! ;-) Jokes aside, great video man! Loved it, keep em coming.
As for getting stuck after landing, had you squeezed the manual brakes enough to disconnect the autobrake? I suspect not and the Autobrake was still operating, obviously cycling the Park Brake will disconnect it, the more conventional way is to override with toe brakes or to put the spoilers down, that should keep you moving.
@@TheBoeingE That would be the correct way on the 787. Stowing the speedbrakes will do it, but on the 787 it creates a jerk, which isn't pleasant. I know because I did exactly that today and immediately regretted it!
@@hashmaldawn3878 , thanks. Nice to know. But wouldn't disarming the auto brake with the knob crate a bit of a jerk as well? On the 737 applying manual brake pressure and subsequently easing of would be far more pleasant than just disarming. And do you have a steering tiller on both sides or only on the left?
@@TheBoeingE For some reason there isn't the same jerk when you disarm the switch. On the 757/767 stowing the speedbrake was exactly how I did it. There are tillers on both sides.
Turning the knob isn’t really how it’s done in the real world - just to be clear, I have 5000hrs 737 and 4000hrs 777, I’ve not flown the 787 but Boeing’s tend to be similar and the 777 rating is valid for 787 with a short conversion so they’re deemed to be very similar. The only time I’ve disconnected via the knob is when landing with MAX set, it can be difficult to override, and as soon as stopping is assured, it’s a nice technique to reduce to another setting during decel, increasing passenger comfort and finessing the operation, so there’s a few options. If you put the speed brake lever down with zero toe brakes then yes, it will feel like a lunge forward as braking goes to zero. Have some pressure on the toe brakes and it’s not a problem, or, as we mostly do in the real aircraft squeeze gently until it disconnects then ease off gently and keep it rolling. Generally by 60kts we want to have more control but depending how the roll out is going, judge it yourself.
I get that it’s a supposed ‘default’ aircraft but it is still effectively a payware aircraft because u have to buy the premium deluxe version to get it, which is almost double the standard cost
@@MuhammadKharismawan that's over the deluxe edition, so less extra cost. For the extra €60 (over standard edition) you get 10 airports and 9 other planes, the 4 planes and 5 airports are €30 (over the deluxe).
The OP isn't saying the premium deluxe version isn't worth it. They're just pointing out that this particular aircraft is currently *lock* to the premium deluxe version and can't be purchase separately.
@@carl8790 I was correcting the second comment, as you get 9 other planes when talking about *double* the price, what he said was not for the "double price" situation. That's all.
One thing I would love to see is weathering and wear/tear on interior surfaces. I love the clean look, but there’s also something about an aged cockpit that I love. Maybe in the future the devs can implement a weathering system that is based on how often you use/clean or maintain your aircraft? That would be amazing to see.
It is much harder to do than you think. Add wear/tear texture is easy but Microsoft have to get permission from whoever made those airplane.Most likely they will say no because that make them look bad.
I noticed the Autobrake went off, the gear went up, both when the flaps reached UP - maybe you had a Co-Pilot assistant selected? Seems odd the gear wouldn’t be selected up by him until then, but that all happened together which is suspicious.
So the ailerons, you have a high-speed (inboard, kind of behind the pylon) and a low-speed (outboard) aileron. Also, the reason for the asymmetrical deflection up and down is that it the "up" deflection is more effective at dropping the wing than the "down" deflection is at raising it. This is more pronounced in the video because the high-speed aileron on the 787 is actually a flaperon (combination flap and aileron) and you have the flaps deployed, which further limits upward deflection. Some wide-body aircraft (like the A300/A310 family) only have an inboard "all-speed aileron" and just have flaps and spoilers outboard.
@@jamesbaxter9123 Grubby's comment compares the ailerons as a whole on the left and right wings. But yeah there is a bug. The tiny flaperon in between the two spoilers should be moving in the opposite direction to how they are now. Some other ppl have commented on it
I cannot for the life of me WAIT to fly NY-JFK to AMS-Schiphol. One of my favorite personal flights when i try to visit once a year. I usually fly Norwegian now with the 787, a rocket of a plane, gets there in around 5.5 hours!
This looks a great representation of the 787! 4:25 You shouldn't put an arrival in before you get airborne in the 787. If you had a really short flight then you could put it in Route 2. A Boeing Bulletin says:- _Operating Instructions If an approach is loaded before departure, be alert for unexpected or unwanted autopilot modes and flight director indications if a TO/GA switch is pushed after takeoff. To prevent unwanted automatic LNAV activation on departure, do not load an instrument approach until after the departure phase of flight_ I point it out, not to be critical, but I know many people try to be as authentic as possible
At 18:00 when you showed ailerons I noticed that the flaperons (those small ailerons between the flap sections) movement is reversed. I suggest you report it to the devs.
yes you are absolutely right. The inboard Flaperon and the outboard aileron move in unison. And the roll spoilers would move up if the aileron and the flaperon move up. Just to be sure that I am not wrong I looked at a few 787 wing view videos here on yt and the flaperon, aileron and the roll spoilers move in the same direction. The way the flaperon moves in the sim would give the aircraft less roll authority.
this is why I wish they would have let swiss001 actually post content they gave him access to the game but refused him the right to post any content before launch...
@@MrXboy07 well he said he now basically has the release build, so I wanna see what actually works in the game/sim before I buy it. So far it looks like there are many things not working properly or at all and Squirrel seems to want to distract us from that by "looking at that beautiful view". I want an honest view of the game/sim, its not only about the scenery but I think thats excatly what Microsoft seems to shove down our throats so we dont see the buggy mess that it is.
@@InsaneTiger07 I just watched a hour long live q and a with Microsoft and osobo and they are well aware of these issues and working constantly to fix them. They made it clear that they viewed the release date as just the begining of things for the development team.
The amount of 'Inop' stuff surprised me. I would have expected something better. Doing so much to increase the experience, from scenery to behaviour and all other fantastic improvements, I would have expected the cockpit experience to be at the same level. Squirrel made fun of the chime button not working, but little simple details as this are very easy to implement and greatly increases enjoyment. Same for the aircon, the sounds and trouble you can get... This really surprised me a lot. Edit - I understand from a comment here, that this is something they hope to do after release and focus on the most important stuff before release. I hope that's true!
I was a little, maybe confused is not too strong of a word, at those types of things being inoperable too. I could certainly see a "casual sim" option in which you just tap a key to start up and set some defaults, for people that just want to get in the air and have some fun, but I hope they'll get around to the little as well! :)
To add and test the coffee button woud take at least a full day of programming. There were surely things that were better programmersa time to do now and leave this till later.
The scene at 17:49 shows us that Microsoft got the flaperon movement backwards. They do follow aileron movement, but the other way around. They should be in sync with the aileron and roll spoilers of their respective wing, but they're moving to the opposite of what they should, i.e, they're going up when they should go DOWN and vice versa. This airliner needs an emergency A.D.
correct. I can't believe they did such a mistake... i thought the aerodynamics is calculated real time... this would make it very unrealistic flight dynamic. #deception
@@iaf22 Yep. The program doesn't really seem to care which surfaces are up or down, it just feeds joystick inputs directly into the flight model. The surfaces themselves are just eye-candy and have nothing whatsoever to do with what is going on. No air flow calculations on each surface, nothing of that sort.
The device you called a tablet on the left is actually an Electronic Flight Bag. It has Terminal Charts, Airport Moving Map, and En-route Maps with Jeppesen Data.
When the default is better than the magknight version for XP11 after all these years Imagine when they update this thing or bring out an advanced dlc for this thing I can't wait
Have you tried the latest version of the MK 789 with the flight deck that looks better than the QW and most certainly more functional than the default Airliners in FS. That plane is mainly made by 4 kids between the age of 17 and 22 ! I wish I could do half of what they can .
@@alexandrep4913 it's a piece of shit, don't care how many people or how hard they worked on it, that's just the truth, this is a default sim aircraft and it looks much better and probably performs better...I mean XP11 probably handicapped them with the mess that sim is with their part users (hence why pmdg never went there) Look at the zibo tho, that's free and all the hard work was done to get that fairly well done and complete Just saying it how it is
I'm sorry, what? The MS 787 might look better but that's it. Only the fuel page works, no tablet, can't even use the air con (which would literally just involve programming the visual button switch and the the display. Let's not forget you have to pay an extra £60 to get this Aircraft! MK's is half the price and way more functional and it's not even finished yet. lazy Microsoft, if your going to charge a premium price then i expect a premium product!
Great stuff. Small request: Your eyepoint is dreadfully low. Any chance of raising the seat so we (and you) can get a more realistic sight-picture of your flights? Really enjoy the flights and commentary.
@@PeterNGloor RTO is actually for the brakes. So in the event of a rejected take off you get maximum braking force. Ground Spoilers will automatically deploy when reverse is activated once the aircraft is over a set speed when takeoff is rejected. Normally 60 to 70knots.
Sorry, I do know the function of autobrake, but I did not read your comment correctly. I think modern jets do not need arming the ground spoilers for T/O, you are correct.
Bravo Sir! Nice little flight around a half pattern. I'm just chomping at the bit to get into this bird! I only hope my Yoke arrives before the game is released! Keeping my fingers crossed! 😁🤞
Is there any replay feature in this game? Perhaps some kind of rewind (like in Forza for example) so you can watch your landing from other perspectives afterwards?
THEMilkSHAIKH we’ve got an equivalent of zibo working on this 787-10 and the a320neo. Community driven freeware mods continuously being updated to bring the default airliners closer and closer to study level 👍👍
As excited as i am to get this & definitely will. From the latest videos I've seen it looks like a 'wait a month to buy it' deal. No problem, i wasn't expecting it to launch until around Christmas anyway.
RTO or rejected takeoff mode is set before takeoff roll. This is normal SOP when setting the airplane up for departure. It should automatically disengage itself 400 feet or so above the ground.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Can we just appreciate how much entertainment Squirrel gives to those of us who doesn’t have the computing powers to run this game
William Baker ya i just love him lol😇😍
Right... I can only afford to play Xplane mobile..................................
Yeah ❤
Gotta love sponsorship.
At least I can play euro truck sim on my old laptop ;)
I am an airline pilot who flies the 787. I have to say this is very realistic. Some of the "inop" items are a bit surprising but for a flight sim it doesn't really matter much. In real life , of course, there are about 400 things that need to be done from power-up to take-off - he does about 10 of them! Many of these "real world" things can safely be ignored in the "sim" world - initiating the ACARS, verifying the C-of-G and trim, making sure the oil levels are acceptable for flight, etc.
One thing I noticed is that the inertia modeling seems way off. There is no way you could intercept the glideslope at 225 knots and slow down without full speedbrakes all the way down. Even with full speedbrakes it's unlikely you'd make the landing. Maybe that's not completely true as I didn't catch what weight the aircraft was programmed at - a very light aircraft might make the landing with 1/2 speedbrake. Essentially you must be at 190-200 knots with at least flap 5 upon G/S intercept and even then you might be using the speedbrake . Take-offs without an accurate trim setting are a really bad idea - lead to tailstrikes, which are multi-million dollar mistakes. Landings in the real aircraft are much more difficult than is shown in this video - mistakes are very expensive.
In the real aircraft we use the LNAV, VNAV and HUD on every take-off. There are very good reasons for doing this - all of which involve real-world IFR procedures - the sim does not care if you deviate from protected IFR airspace while real controllers care A LOT.
Anyway, looks pretty good - graphics are amazing.
If you are interested I'm starting a BB for simmers to ask questions of real pilots. It would just for fun, and hopefully there will be a range of aircraft types represented.
@@hashmaldawn3878 Sure, give me the details.
I fly the 78 as well and as jet lagged as I am now and quite happy to not fly for a few days, I really want to try this sim! I did cringe though at things like arming speed brakes for take off. That kind of thing makes me want to contribute as well, but it's bad enough I came out as being a pilot here. Not really an AW much. Who do you fly for?
You must be a cart puller with that kind of grossly incorrect information. 787 pilot right 😂
@@gamerdaddy2570 Give one specific thing that's wrong please.
This “game” is just incredible with the visuals. My god. Doesn’t look computer. But doesn’t look like it’s artificial. It just looks ‘real’ which I guess until now has been extremely difficult to do for anyone. Their new mapping tech looks incredible.
For your safety, don't say "game" if you're around simmers.
The Flying Ben 😂🤷🏼♂️🛫 I used the quotes with great caution 😉
@@michaelmesolellaesq
You have chosen...........
Wisely.😜✝👍🛩
I feel that some of the controls are more arcadey if you play with a controller in comparison to X-Plane 11
Not really, compare the "game" to real life flights and it's still clearly a video game.
From a caterer that is often on the back door of the 787, that apu sound is spot on
Good to hear. Everything else sounds like a.... Vacuum cleaner. But it is a default ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@@MsRifle yeah even toga sounds like a 787 at idle
@Octopus he literally says...sounds like a 787!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@Matthias Velders let's see the world
Okay come lets check meal
Ailerons and flaperons on the 787 are much like the F-22 Raptor control surfaces. An insane amount of engineering went into designing and developing the use of the ailerons, flaperons, and speed breaks all at once. I won't dive in too deep about the exact physics but for anyone who is wondering; the reason the raptor, 787, etc use all the surfaces at once is to reduce adverse yaw and to keep the aircraft coordinated at all attitudes during all phases of flight. The fly-by-wire controls are absolutely nuts and is truly and engineering marvel.
Squirrel: *Produces literal butter as he’s landing*
Also Squirrel: “Ehhh well we didn’t die so that’s good”
well its not Ryanair so high standards
No.
That ground effect saved him with being 5-10 kts over his expected Vref without flaring so yeah, not much of skill so much as dumb luck.
You ought to watch Swiss001
@@RydalS You mean the no skill pilot that got his start on IF (remember when he first joined) and is overrated on skill? Yeah no. Hard pass.
Edit: I should also add that the kid doesnt actually know an ounce of how to actually fly an aircraft. If you rely on him for knowing how to fly simulators you are being duped by a DA.
"It sounds a bit like my Dyson vacuum cleaner"
Squirrel showing off his big RUclips money haha
I have a Dyson but it's the broom model...
You know you've made it when you've got a Dyson
I got a dyson, lol.
Somebody's earning 😉
Both my Dyson fans have just stopped working so I guess they are more akin to the 737 Max
I’m going to be honest, my jaw dropped seeing all those computer screens in the cockpit . I’m so used to FSX, used to seeing only one or two NON-interactive screens. Seeing these GIANT and INTERACTIVE computer screens is purely jaw dropping! So cool to see!
QualityWings 787 for P3D/FSX, while not on the level of a PMDG aircraft, is better than this default 787. I hope they port it. FSX's default aircraft are very poor, but the good add-ons are still much better than FS2020 defaults.
@@superpachin And pmdg is already working on msfs2020
With the exception of Aerosoft's A320, I typically only fly the default aircraft so I'm really happy with the level of detail in the new flight models. Can't wait for Tuesday!
@@ortundgaming967 Default aircraft is shit, I don't think you can flight sim with FSX default planes... At least I can't. Aerosoft also, not enough study-level for me. Even old PMDG 737NGX isn't good enough. FSlabs A319/20/21 or PMDG 747 and PMDG 737NGXu are only good enough. Besides that, you need Active Sky Pro, fly on VATSIM, have good airport sceneries because it is not possible to fly with shit default airports, Ground Services X also
@@NextGenGamer1 sounds pretty spoilt to me, for me these defaults seem good enuf, i only need some different types
of aircraft. like a dhc otter or so.
My initial thought for the premium deluxe is you're getting 10 more aircraft and 10 more airports for an additional $59.90 if you divide it by 20 you're getting 787 Dreamliner for roughly $2.99. To me that's a pretty good deal for an aircraft like this even if some systems are inop at the moment. Thanks for sharing!
The first shot of the dreamliner dropped my jaw. It's beyond gorgeous.
Totally agree! Much more awesome than the Freeware TDS 787 model with the 737 VC panel.
@@JamieTucker1974 I used to fly a freeware 787 in FSX and loved it. But yes for default aircrafts these are the new winners.
That 787 looks absolutely beautiful! Definitely worth the price for the premium deluxe edition to have this sexyyyyyyy bird in my hangar!
I got premium deluxe for the SR-22 :P
And we need to ask Asobo to add A350 and A380
@@itmessenger77 no, no, let aerosoft/fslabs/FlightFactor make a 100% A350
@@marcoantoniomendes6711 For study lvl yes, but for those whom wish for a more causal experience at a lower cost, Asobo should make a default A350 + A380
@@marcoantoniomendes6711 Can’t wait to fly the A350 in this sim it’s gonna be awsome having those spaceship like displays while on an approach in night time.
17:26 Those wings flexing up and down when you stop tho, can't tell you how happy I am to see that level of detail.
**movin up'n'down side to side like a rollercoaster**
Your happy? I’m annoyed that loads of things are inop
@@mammid9622 It's still pre-release and things will get updates for 10 years, so yeah, I'm happy alright.
@@raykrislianggi This is final build, not pre-release. The game is either ready for release or it's not. If they're charging me €69 for the base game I want everything working in it. To see this flawed ideal of we'll fix it later in action look at Bioware's Anthem.
Paul Brennan it’s not the developers fault coz they aren’t the ones saying it, it’s the fans, they keep saying it will get fixed later, but really I don’t think it’s flawed, this is just how default aircraft in flight sims work
so now only the A350 left and I‘am perfectly happy.. FS2020 with stunning Graphics + VATSIM + detailed 737, A320, A350 = goodby real life.
oh my god an A350 and 737 would make this game perfect.
Can't wait for a complete A350. Been waiting since FSX, none. P3D, none (only problematic, "stolen" freeware). XPlane, yeah but incomplete
Muhammad Ahdal'ula Rayhanfasya that’s true I’ve been waiting so long for this Aircraft.. on the one hand its maybe to complex.. but on the other hand there is the 787 by QualityWings and both aircrafts are pretty similar..
A380 for me..
A380 ???
I've watched several of your videos now and I just want to say I love how much you use the chapters features. I don't use it to skip anything, I just love that you use it.
That wing flex when he stopped on the taxi out 😍
Going by the Livestream Q&A, more airliner features will be added later (including things like seatbelt sign switches etc). They just wanted to focus on core systems for now.
Also, liveries are definitely coming!
Hype
Thanks for that I couldn't be bothered to watch the Q&A
the core systems of GA aircraft really, the airliners are going to be very wip for a while I'd guess. They are ironing out the autopilot quirks right now, then they'll probably flesh out the airliners more.
Where in the livestream did they ever say that features will be added later like seatbelt sign switches? I have watched the whole q&a and they mentioned that there standard planes will not inculde this stuff because they are not study level! Liveries where mentioned yes.
@@forexample7417 dude you do realize all flight sims on the market released in much worse conditions and had literally a decade to mature, or more? This is not Call of Duty.
I was a passenger on a 787 Dreamliner a little while back with Royal Brunei, flying Melbourne-Brunei-Dubai-London then returned the same route, loved it great crew and great airplane.
I love the Dreamliner, flown on it to the Caribbean many times with TUI in Premium.. it's a gorgeous beast of a plane. Love the window tinting, and the lighting.
Grampy Gamer I seen a Dreamliner TUI at Bristol airport
It looks absolutely fantastic, wingflex, suspension, can see the weight when you brake
Really appreciate that you upload your videos in 21:9 ratio!🙌
Way better than 4k . I love ultrawide
I love how cabin windows finally look like they’re actually there.
And dont look like they’ve been sprayed with 900 bottles of windex lol
Squirrel: "It sounds like my vacuum cleaner"
Me: It sounds like my ps4
*PS4 Pro
JAMNICK ok i get the joke but I think a pc can be worse sometimes.
Sound like my PC
@@virtualpedestrian3271 white toaster*
@@Akuzo28 Bullshit xD my PS4 is like 140 Decibels
that plane flies like a dream, it makes the FSX jets look like absolute garbage. geez I'm so keen to finally get a flight sim upgrade after all these years
DeSinc
That's why they call it a DREAM liner haha
Generic_ And thanks to the china virus, as a furloughed airline pilot, it shall remain in the realm of dreams 😞.
@@Shadow__133 Yup :(
Can we expect some flight sim backwards bunny hop videos desinc?
I cannot believe that I am saying this: " Default isn't so bad."
So, I was one of those complaining about the Default (I'm actually still complaining). Yesterday, I decided to take the default X-Plane 747 for a ride. What a piece of trash. Default x Default, the msfs wins hands down.
Just what I want, this video is giving what is one of a kind to find on the internet, just starting it, flying etc. It’s good!
The landing gear might have reached the maximum air pressure so they can’t move up. When this happens in real life you need to slow down so the pressure drops from the moving air, flip the gear up and increase the speed once again.
It looks more like an air/ground logic problem, since the autobrake did not move either
@Nahoj I really doubt that is the case. In-depth simulation is not exactly the impression I'm getting from the heavies in MSFS.
FSLabs would be a different story.
btw is that me or MS didn't modelised the main landing gear tilt ?
Would that stop the gear lever in the cockpit from moving though?
@@endefael yea I ve noticed that too but the autobrakes switch didn't move after landing so I think it's maybe a bug tho
Glad I refunded the default version and upgraded to the premium deluxe. Looking forward to this alot.
You can also upgrade to premium deluxe after getting the default version
@@JadenAccord how much then?
i dont have that much money available for a unreleased sim. 75 euro is more then enough
You could be able to buy them separately or mod it for free so I don't know why you didn't wait
@@JadenAccord can you do that on steam? I dont see an option there
Squirrel: “ It sounds like my vacuum cleaner”
Me: “ It sounds like my laptop”
Or a PS4 haha
My laptop when it will try running this game at lowest setting..
Afif Robbani at least yours can run it
to be fair, for those of us that have worked around it... it very much does sound like that, the spool up and downs are slower, but its very close, this has to due with it being a bleedless ultra high bypass engine... basically it is a giant fan that is driven by a jet engine.
Sounds like CPU fan during summer
"It sounds like my vacuum cleaner"
nah.
It sounds like my Helios 300 on turbo mode
18:49
"It's about as modern as modern cockpit gets"
SpaceX:
"Hold my Falcon".
This guy getting us through the final few days before Microsoft flight sim is released. Whatta Guy ❤️
The ramp guy...😂🤣
"Nothing like a blast of jet exhaust in the morning. Sears the lungs and gives you a helluva tan."
P.S. The big jets are very much a WiP. Can't wait for some TPD love to hit MSFS. As it is now it's a VFR/GA sim only.
Thats the feeling i got from this as well the a320 with space shuttle engines 1/3rd of the systems inop on most transport aircraft but for a GA sim its still good the large jets are good toys for screwing about tho
Asobo knows NOBODY plays the default planes for features they make it usable and leave the detailed stuff for PMDG and flight factor
Im happy they just gave us this many planes
I have heard that PMDG is porting over their airplanes so it might come to MSFS soon hopefully
john leininger Flight Factor for one, isn’t moving over from what I know, and they are relatively hated. Prepar3d devs I’m sure will be moving over, same for fsx, and their modding community is thriving.
lmao underrated comment
His name must be Russell Bell.
Hey look the luggage guy isn’t floating anymore
Thanks god. His ass must be relieved now
What? That's what I was buying it for! Cancel preorder!
wewk584 lol
Dreamliner is one of the best jet plane in our century. I have travelled so many times by riding this plane.
thank you Boeing! and Thank you squirrel!
The Dreamliner and A350 cockpits are pure bliss, I'm glad to see one of them in MSFS.
Im so used to flight sims being scuffed, itswerid to see one so refined
very nice of Microsoft, they actually asked those companies who made the plugins for FSX to work on these models.
Right above each front window is a heads-up display. You should be able to click on it and it’ll fold down. There may be switches to control it... I’m just guessing. Please do another quick video showing the HUD in action... assuming it works in this build. Beautiful plane!!!! Thanks for sharing this. :-)
35:36 "It's a very nice approach at Nice"
That's very nice indeed
23:41"Boy I swore I pressed the gear" hahaha Hopefully these are words never spoken by a real pilot, just kidding. Love your videos sir...
"Positive rate, gear up"
Gear doesn't come up... doesn't check it :p
@@TheLowSnow Maybe keyboard shortcut?
YES FINALLY A VIDEO ON THE DREAMLINER
The guy at 10:37 is the reason why we have work safety videos....
XD
He likes living at the limit 😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Very funny :-D
lmfao
your autobrake was on RTYO, in this the gear wheels need to stop spinning before gear up maybe
Please explain more, just fyi if you dident know rto means rejected takeoff and in the actual plane it will automatically disarm when airborne. On the inside of the gear wheel thing are pads of metal or something as a skid pad if gear is still spinning
YD Simulations yes that is correct.
I believe it should click back into off for autobrake after taking off
@@MrTripsJ you're right. I was thinking about that too. I guess it is a bug. And during gear retraction the rear gears are stopped automatically.
It depends on the wheels spinning or not? Why isn't it linked to Weight-On-Wheels, i.e. if there is no weight pushing down on the wheels then logically the aircraft is airborne already.
definitely waiting for pdmg! But this sim is revolutionary for the flight sim community!
yep, after around 14 years, they finally give us a new good flight simulator.
and also nonstop updates until 2030. insane.
Looks like the best of the default airliners. Btw the 787 allows you to start both engines at once
I'm lucky enough to have been in the flight deck of a 787 and can confirm that yes that is what it looks like. The emersion is pretty much BANG ON accurate
During flight when he showed the outside camera you could see the wings were heavily bent upwards. A lot of flex being shown at 26:30
That's the flexible carbon fiber wings in action!
just flew on a 787 a coupe days ago sitting right by the wings, confirming the wing flex is *wild*
Hugo Bokhorst I think they were referencing the fact that squirrel completely didn’t say anything about it. They were way above the top of the fuselage
@@Jst3r way above top of the fuselage is by design on a 787. Dreamliner wings are sloped upward, they have a heavy dihedral to them. that is not a bug.
@@ShivamPatel-et4kk I think he means squirrel looking for the wings to move to demonstrate wing flex when just seeing the angle gave it away
I was wondering, if 3rd party devs can have access to the default aircraft and work from there, much like the Zibo 737 for X-Plane 11. Reason I'm thinking of this, is I WANT the graphic details of the default aircraft. I mean, all the knobs are there, except that many of them are inopt.
Absolutely what I was thinking. Imagine Zibo getting his hands on the 787, considering that PMDG is already developing the 737.
In their Q&A yesterday, MS and Asobo have clearly stated 'NO'... There will be updates, but the default a/c will not be opened for modification.
Quality wings posted in the fourms that they are trying to bring there 787-8,9,10 to the new sim that they made for Fsx and P3d. There quality was pretty close to pmdg with alot of functionality was my fav plane to use in Fsx.
@@planely1263 :( I just hope 3rd party aircraft devs will make their graphics on par if not better than default. I hear some of you say systems depth and realism is more important than graphics, etc. But for me, graphics fidelity is itself "realism". I have seen and bought some study-level a/c for XP - very well done simulation but the graphics? I prefer the default xp.
@@santiagoluib3 yeah I totally agree. I never used XP but most 3rd party addons like pmdg and Quality wings aircraft model graphics were very high quality for the last MSFS from sound, to interior and exterior.
Squirrel
: i will shut up for a second to let you hear……
AD：ME
use adblock
@@tezatmezat yeah good call, use adblock and not let the youtuber get some $$ from his video!!
@@AriochGS sounds about right
@@tezatmezat I rather let Squirrel have the ad money. Who knows, he might even be able to buy a chewing gum with it!
@@ΓιώργοςΑλεξάκης-ι5ζ i said youtubeR not youtube!
Mate, that was a great landing POG
Been a LONG TIME COMING for FS2020!
I was waiting for this!!!! Thanks so much!
same
All these bugs with the ILS on both the A320 and 787 worry me a bit.
I only fly airliners and prefer to fly in real world weather. Given all these bugs these aircraft can only be flown in nice weather conditions at the moment.
I hope they will fix it soon as the rest of the sim is simply stunning.
I cannot wait to see what companies like PMDG are going to create.
Love seeing these videos, Squirrel. You know what would be really awesome? If you did a multi-part series of videos explaining the basics of flying planes on this new sim. Things like the simplest way to get from point A to point B (airport to airport) using the navigation equipment; basics of using the autopilot; basics of flying and landing. That sort of thing. Not super in-depth, but just enough to get someone like me with little exp (last time I played Microsoft FSX was YEARS ago at this point) to be able to takeoff from an airport, have a destination in mind, and be able to navigate there and land successfully. Doesn't even need to be on a large aircraft like this, even instructions for a smaller prop plane would be awesome. Maybe there is already someone doing that on youtube, but I feel like you would do a great job at explaining a "crash course" (pun intended) of flying in this new sim. I originally found you on here nearly a year ago from your Euro Truck Sim videos, and seeing you pop back up on my feed playing a game I have highly anticipated since finding out about is really awesome. Thanks for all the great content!
Starting engines on stand with no beacon on and all ground crew and vehicles surrounding the aircraft, thug life! ;-)
Jokes aside, great video man! Loved it, keep em coming.
Beacon was on, it was the nav light he forgot!
As for getting stuck after landing, had you squeezed the manual brakes enough to disconnect the autobrake? I suspect not and the Autobrake was still operating, obviously cycling the Park Brake will disconnect it, the more conventional way is to override with toe brakes or to put the spoilers down, that should keep you moving.
or just turn the autobrake knob to disarm when slow enough and let it roll out on a rapid exit taxiway
@@TheBoeingE That would be the correct way on the 787. Stowing the speedbrakes will do it, but on the 787 it creates a jerk, which isn't pleasant. I know because I did exactly that today and immediately regretted it!
@@hashmaldawn3878 , thanks. Nice to know. But wouldn't disarming the auto brake with the knob crate a bit of a jerk as well? On the 737 applying manual brake pressure and subsequently easing of would be far more pleasant than just disarming. And do you have a steering tiller on both sides or only on the left?
@@TheBoeingE For some reason there isn't the same jerk when you disarm the switch. On the 757/767 stowing the speedbrake was exactly how I did it.
There are tillers on both sides.
Turning the knob isn’t really how it’s done in the real world - just to be clear, I have 5000hrs 737 and 4000hrs 777, I’ve not flown the 787 but Boeing’s tend to be similar and the 777 rating is valid for 787 with a short conversion so they’re deemed to be very similar. The only time I’ve disconnected via the knob is when landing with MAX set, it can be difficult to override, and as soon as stopping is assured, it’s a nice technique to reduce to another setting during decel, increasing passenger comfort and finessing the operation, so there’s a few options. If you put the speed brake lever down with zero toe brakes then yes, it will feel like a lunge forward as braking goes to zero. Have some pressure on the toe brakes and it’s not a problem, or, as we mostly do in the real aircraft squeeze gently until it disconnects then ease off gently and keep it rolling. Generally by 60kts we want to have more control but depending how the roll out is going, judge it yourself.
Would be nice if Microsoft made an expansion pack for every airplane making it study level. Decently priced ofc.
No need when you have products from places like PMDG
@@AdventuresonTour While I agree. PMDG aircraft are really expensive for alot of people.
I get that it’s a supposed ‘default’ aircraft but it is still effectively a payware aircraft because u have to buy the premium deluxe version to get it, which is almost double the standard cost
yes, but you also get 4 more planes and a couple of handcrafted airport with it.
@@MuhammadKharismawan that's over the deluxe edition, so less extra cost. For the extra €60 (over standard edition) you get 10 airports and 9 other planes, the 4 planes and 5 airports are €30 (over the deluxe).
The OP isn't saying the premium deluxe version isn't worth it. They're just pointing out that this particular aircraft is currently *lock* to the premium deluxe version and can't be purchase separately.
@@carl8790 I was correcting the second comment, as you get 9 other planes when talking about *double* the price, what he said was not for the "double price" situation. That's all.
One thing I would love to see is weathering and wear/tear on interior surfaces. I love the clean look, but there’s also something about an aged cockpit that I love. Maybe in the future the devs can implement a weathering system that is based on how often you use/clean or maintain your aircraft? That would be amazing to see.
It is much harder to do than you think. Add wear/tear texture is easy but Microsoft have to get permission from whoever made those airplane.Most likely they will say no because that make them look bad.
My autopilot and speed break buttons would be dust on the cockpit floor.
Beautiful!
Nice landing by the way mate!!
This FS is gorgeous!
We need the HUD!!!
The HUD on the 787 Dreamliner is operational!
@@will1856 Awesome, it's one of the things I use most on my QW787 because I can look out the window.
I noticed the Autobrake went off, the gear went up, both when the flaps reached UP - maybe you had a Co-Pilot assistant selected? Seems odd the gear wouldn’t be selected up by him until then, but that all happened together which is suspicious.
So the ailerons, you have a high-speed (inboard, kind of behind the pylon) and a low-speed (outboard) aileron. Also, the reason for the asymmetrical deflection up and down is that it the "up" deflection is more effective at dropping the wing than the "down" deflection is at raising it.
This is more pronounced in the video because the high-speed aileron on the 787 is actually a flaperon (combination flap and aileron) and you have the flaps deployed, which further limits upward deflection.
Some wide-body aircraft (like the A300/A310 family) only have an inboard "all-speed aileron" and just have flaps and spoilers outboard.
GrubbyZebra also of note is that some aircraft turn off the low speed ones in cruise and just operate on the outboard controls.
Theyre not asymmetric on the real plane - this is definitely a bug
@@jamesbaxter9123 Grubby's comment compares the ailerons as a whole on the left and right wings. But yeah there is a bug. The tiny flaperon in between the two spoilers should be moving in the opposite direction to how they are now. Some other ppl have commented on it
@@Persephone_ all good mate thank you!
I see the bug regarding the inverted movement of the high-speed flaperon.
I cannot for the life of me WAIT to fly NY-JFK to AMS-Schiphol. One of my favorite personal flights when i try to visit once a year. I usually fly Norwegian now with the 787, a rocket of a plane, gets there in around 5.5 hours!
This looks a great representation of the 787!
4:25 You shouldn't put an arrival in before you get airborne in the 787. If you had a really short flight then you could put it in Route 2.
A Boeing Bulletin says:- _Operating Instructions
If an approach is loaded before departure, be alert for unexpected or unwanted autopilot modes and flight director indications if a TO/GA switch is pushed after takeoff.
To prevent unwanted automatic LNAV activation on departure, do not load an instrument approach until after the departure phase of flight_
I point it out, not to be critical, but I know many people try to be as authentic as possible
At 18:00 when you showed ailerons I noticed that the flaperons (those small ailerons between the flap sections) movement is reversed. I suggest you report it to the devs.
Ilia Prokhorenko I could be wrong here, but I believe on the 787 it’s part of the damper system
yes you are absolutely right. The inboard Flaperon and the outboard aileron move in unison. And the roll spoilers would move up if the aileron and the flaperon move up.
Just to be sure that I am not wrong I looked at a few 787 wing view videos here on yt and the flaperon, aileron and the roll spoilers move in the same direction. The way the flaperon moves in the sim would give the aircraft less roll authority.
Well spotted!
Dare Devil my Apologies I stand corrected. Thank you for clarifying
At ~ 24:50, the auto brake was still in RTO, Rejected Take Off, so to reject a take off, landing has to be down, to be able to brake...
Could you make a video where you actually let the AP actually try to land? You always shut it off, but i actually wanna see what it does
I think it’s still buggy that’s why
Would be nice, and in Nice they never fly the ILS unless for safety reasons. Would have been nice to see a NPA
this is why I wish they would have let swiss001 actually post content they gave him access to the game but refused him the right to post any content before launch...
@@MrXboy07 well he said he now basically has the release build, so I wanna see what actually works in the game/sim before I buy it.
So far it looks like there are many things not working properly or at all and Squirrel seems to want to distract us from that by "looking at that beautiful view".
I want an honest view of the game/sim, its not only about the scenery but I think thats excatly what Microsoft seems to shove down our throats so we dont see the buggy mess that it is.
@@InsaneTiger07 I just watched a hour long live q and a with Microsoft and osobo and they are well aware of these issues and working constantly to fix them. They made it clear that they viewed the release date as just the begining of things for the development team.
No cabin chime? Clearly the developers have some serious work left to so. Hehehe.
That wing flexing is both awe inspiring and terrifying.
Ahhh Nice Côte d'Azur, one of the beautifulest approach in the world. Thanks
The amount of 'Inop' stuff surprised me. I would have expected something better. Doing so much to increase the experience, from scenery to behaviour and all other fantastic improvements, I would have expected the cockpit experience to be at the same level. Squirrel made fun of the chime button not working, but little simple details as this are very easy to implement and greatly increases enjoyment. Same for the aircon, the sounds and trouble you can get... This really surprised me a lot.
Edit - I understand from a comment here, that this is something they hope to do after release and focus on the most important stuff before release. I hope that's true!
I was a little, maybe confused is not too strong of a word, at those types of things being inoperable too. I could certainly see a "casual sim" option in which you just tap a key to start up and set some defaults, for people that just want to get in the air and have some fun, but I hope they'll get around to the little as well! :)
@@ZalymBiscayn Let's hope for the best. It would be great to use the plane as real as it can be.
To add and test the coffee button woud take at least a full day of programming. There were surely things that were better programmersa time to do now and leave this till later.
The scene at 17:49 shows us that Microsoft got the flaperon movement backwards. They do follow aileron movement, but the other way around. They should be in sync with the aileron and roll spoilers of their respective wing, but they're moving to the opposite of what they should, i.e, they're going up when they should go DOWN and vice versa.
This airliner needs an emergency A.D.
correct. I can't believe they did such a mistake... i thought the aerodynamics is calculated real time... this would make it very unrealistic flight dynamic. #deception
@@iaf22 Yep. The program doesn't really seem to care which surfaces are up or down, it just feeds joystick inputs directly into the flight model. The surfaces themselves are just eye-candy and have nothing whatsoever to do with what is going on. No air flow calculations on each surface, nothing of that sort.
EXACTLY ITS complete bullshit 😂😂😂😂
Squirrel: "Hopefully they will iron the bugs out before the 18th"
Me: Crap, Forgot ive got ironing to do, im too addicted to this sim.
Hurry up and iron your army uniform, don't forget to polish your boots
I flew on one of these when I went to the Maldives last year and it was the smoothest and quietest flight I’ve ever been on
The device you called a tablet on the left is actually an Electronic Flight Bag. It has Terminal Charts, Airport Moving Map, and En-route Maps with Jeppesen Data.
My only improvement would be the option to include the option of the loading of passengers and baggage etc.
The landing gear didn't want to come up because the auto-brake was in the auto position, u should turn it off then put the gear up
lol not true irl. this thing is a pos
@@Rtzimbobweee I just think that the auto-brake was the cause because when the landing gear went up, the auto-brake switched to off
When the default is better than the magknight version for XP11 after all these years
Imagine when they update this thing or bring out an advanced dlc for this thing
I can't wait
Have you tried the latest version of the MK 789 with the flight deck that looks better than the QW and most certainly more functional than the default Airliners in FS.
That plane is mainly made by 4 kids between the age of 17 and 22 ! I wish I could do half of what they can .
Oop magknight fanboy above
Xavier Lignieres mk fanboy
@@alexandrep4913 it's a piece of shit, don't care how many people or how hard they worked on it, that's just the truth, this is a default sim aircraft and it looks much better and probably performs better...I mean XP11 probably handicapped them with the mess that sim is with their part users (hence why pmdg never went there)
Look at the zibo tho, that's free and all the hard work was done to get that fairly well done and complete
Just saying it how it is
I'm sorry, what? The MS 787 might look better but that's it. Only the fuel page works, no tablet, can't even use the air con (which would literally just involve programming the visual button switch and the the display. Let's not forget you have to pay an extra £60 to get this Aircraft! MK's is half the price and way more functional and it's not even finished yet. lazy Microsoft, if your going to charge a premium price then i expect a premium product!
Gosh 17:28 that's what i call realism just look at the whole plane come to a stop and basically giggle lol
Love to see more bush flying in the cub mate !
The guy at 10:35 is the strongest man alive.
"Tis but a light breeze"
Great stuff. Small request: Your eyepoint is dreadfully low. Any chance of raising the seat so we (and you) can get a more realistic sight-picture of your flights? Really enjoy the flights and commentary.
Seems to be common in all the videos I’ve seen so far
And all you have to do to raise the eyepoint in the sim is press space 😂
@@M57connoissuer I'm not trying to play gotcha, just making a minor suggestion. I'm sure Squirrel knows this. He flies RL and knows what he's doing.
Please remember you don't arm spoilers for take off in a boeing
At least someone... :p
@@PeterNGloor RTO is actually for the brakes. So in the event of a rejected take off you get maximum braking force. Ground Spoilers will automatically deploy when reverse is activated once the aircraft is over a set speed when takeoff is rejected. Normally 60 to 70knots.
Sorry, I do know the function of autobrake, but I did not read your comment correctly. I think modern jets do not need arming the ground spoilers for T/O, you are correct.
Bravo Sir! Nice little flight around a half pattern. I'm just chomping at the bit to get into this bird! I only hope my Yoke arrives before the game is released! Keeping my fingers crossed! 😁🤞
Omg........ I could sit there and have that start up sound on replay for hours, possibly even be put to sleep by it.
I've flown on the plane (England -Mexico) my favourite flight ever!
“Landing gear is not working”.....this simulator is soo real that even has Boeing issues that can make planes crash! Wow!
Now we just need Zibo to make this perfect!
Zibo won't come to msfs. Austin has confirmed that. The zibo 737 is based on laminar assets.
@@vin340600 the team could still work on improving the stock aircraft in msfs
@@IndianGeek5589 i heard all the aircraft are encrypted making a zibo like project impossible
@@gavinjohnson4628 hmm. that's unfortunate
Quality wings made the 787-8, 9 and 10 for the last MSFS fsx and p3d so hopefully they bring it to the new platform.
Love the Dreamliner. I do hope that they will include Concorde at some stage. Will be nice to have the most beautiful aircraft back in the sky.
Concorde is being made by a 3rd party developer and will come to the sim at some point 👍🏼
It is absolutely stunning
Is there any replay feature in this game? Perhaps some kind of rewind (like in Forza for example) so you can watch your landing from other perspectives afterwards?
FSX has it so probably yes
He sounds a bit like Brian Cox when he says "absolutely magnificent"
Prof Brian Cox, legend such a intelligent and nice person, love watching BBC Earth channel with all the programmes Brian Cox documents.
@@andrewb2476 also the drummer from D Ream!
@@steveyford7127 thought he played keyboards?
@@griggsyk indeed he did.
@@steveyford7127 nope
Great video.. I retired from airline flying a couple of weeks ago and the B787 was my last aircraft :-( Did you try the HUD? Does it work?
I could watch this man all day!!
That landing was butter!
How's the Citation Longitude looking?
"this is about as modern as a modern cockpit gets" *screams in A350*🤣
My favorite airliner to fly, feels like a spaceship.
Imagine Zibo getting his hands on this.
Oh lord
THEMilkSHAIKH we’ve got an equivalent of zibo working on this 787-10 and the a320neo. Community driven freeware mods continuously being updated to bring the default airliners closer and closer to study level 👍👍
As excited as i am to get this & definitely will. From the latest videos I've seen it looks like a 'wait a month to buy it' deal. No problem, i wasn't expecting it to launch until around Christmas anyway.
Very cool! I have a good friend who flys the 787 for Air Canada and I will share this vid with him. Cheers!
Also, your gear issue was because your autobrake was armed.
I wish he'd stop labelling everything as a bug, even though he'd mess it up. It's painting a bad image of the sim.
Are you sure about this? It seems odd that you'd need to disarm autobrakes before raising the gear...
RTO mode should disable itself after takeoff.
This is incorrect. Auto brake has nothing to do with the gear. In fact the auto brake should snap back to off once airborne.
RTO or rejected takeoff mode is set before takeoff roll. This is normal SOP when setting the airplane up for departure. It should automatically disengage itself 400 feet or so above the ground.