Steven Crowder - I am pro life - Change My Mind (compilation)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 окт 2024
- Real Conversations - Steven Crowder - I am pro life Change My Mind. I watched 2 hours of film and shortened it to 8 minutes. The compilation is what I think was the best parts of the full episodes.
Steven Crowder visits universities and other public places and invites people to try make him change his mind - tells them that he is pro life.
I would like to advice you to see the whole thing here:
• I’m Pro-Life | Change ...
• I’m Pro-Life (2nd Edit...
Love watching Steven Crowder. Thanks for the compilation about abortion - I really liked it.
Thank you. Also love wathing Steven Crowder - change my mind. And I am very much pro life, so that is why I made this compilation
I am also very much pro life. Dont understand those who aren´t at all :(
I agree. I actually believe that the laws will become more strict in the future.
It is great that people like Steven Crowder help changing people´s opinion on the subject
I don’t mean to offend you at all...but why are you pro-life? I’m pro-choice and just want to know why some people believe in pro-life, just curious ☺️
If you kill it, it was alive.
agree
@@4KDroneVideos is killing always wrong? why is killing animals ok?
@@aevans03 comparing animals to babies....man you are really something
@@luka759 P.S. WE ARE ANIMALS
you can also kill plants, so what
4:07 "I support 4 choices - contraception, abstinence, motherhood and adoption" (I honestly didn't expect him to be that prepared with an informative answer).
You are the best at explaining an intelligent argument! Love your content!
yes, Steven Crowder has great arguments
Love Steven Crowder
middle aged women have serious problems admitting its wrong to abort most have ad an abortion who fight so hard to not say its wrong cos that would make them in the own mind A
If we have bacteria on Mars we call it life. But here it's not the case????
You gotta have a legit reason, that's how I feel.
Life begins at conception, I believe abortion at any point from conception to birth is deeply and morally wrong. So people like to argue that life doesn’t begin at conception and to those people I say wether you consider it a life now or not the simple truth is that in 9 short months it well be. So either way you look at it you are taking a life.
I agree to a point. All it is at that point is potential but in many cases what more but potential can many of these fatherless classes unborn babies give? If anything we are to promote abortion amongst these people, hell even give ut to them for free, if they want to off themselves and ruin their reproductive organs good for them ams even better cor us decent folk.
@@fridasophia5356I used to think that too after I slowly realized just how bad it was.
Now my cynical self has grown and I don't want it around even for Darwin Award nominees
Look at the sign at the center back: "the butcher's son"
Interesting coincidence, since we are talking about abortion...
Wow!
I like Crowder's take on abortion. It's a breath of fresh air compared to like TFP student thing because they are wierd.
That was a super deep topic
yes - it is, but also a very important one. I am very much pro-life myself, so that is also my passion to promote pro life arguments
@@4KDroneVideos What if someone rape my and I get pregnant? I need to carry the life ?
@@giubster6898 yes very tricky situation very horrible situation that nobody should ever have to go through but even if the situation did happen it would justify you taking somebody else’s life to wrongs don’t make a right, so if abortion was legal in those cases you be against it and all other cases if not why bring this up in the first place.
This is a very deep and strong topic 😧
it sure is, but I think Steven Crowder has a very clear voice in "Change my life"
I had a 10 week old fetus almost kill me. It was my first child and I misscarried, and if it wasnt for a d&c I would be dead. My 2nd miscarriage was at 6 weeks. I didnt almost die that time. I want to have children. I am pro choice even more so after my experience.
You dont understand the debate. The problem is not misscarieg the problem is killing a child for no reason
@@owfn7873 what makes you think I don't understand? Maybe I see a connection you dont but you seem to know what I understand or what you Assume what I understand. Got a question feel free to ask. But please dont assume what I know and dont know. Thank you.
@@poly-tick7199 the point pro lifers make is that killing a life when it's unnecessary is morally wrong. A lot of pro lifers would agree on your case that abortion is necessary, when the mother could die in the process. These people who are victims of rape, incest or could die during pregnancy - they should be given the choice. The whole crux of the discussion is that pro choices usually like to dismiss the fetus as a not real human being, which halts the discussion vfrom progressing.
I think this is what you might've misunderstood.
Well that’s unfortunate that you’re more pro-choice, I don’t see how that would make you more pro choice pro life people are 100% in favor of you getting miscarriage treatment.
My stance on the issue of abortion in cases where the woman’s life is at risk, now this is where it’s not so black-and-white it can be more complicated, I think the goal should always be the save both lives, and if you can you should absolutely do it, if there is no way to save the child, then I would say let it die naturally and then remove it, but I wouldn’t necessarily say decision it is completely immoral to kill it, let’s see there’s two people dangling from a cliff and you can only save one, you’re not necessarily immoral if you choose one of the other. You should always try to save both and if the mother dies the mother dies if the child is the child dies, if it’s going to die anyway it would be pointless to let the mother die because you have both lives that are dead, and there’s absolutely nothing you can do to save the fetus then it would make sense to save the mother, if it’s the other way around in the mother is going to die anyway you should save the fetus if it is going to live. There’s usually multiple ways you can treat this but sometimes it does come down to a life or death situation. I value both lives equally, and I think we should always try to save both, but if it’s only possible to save the mother we save the mother if it’s only possible to save a fetus we save the fetus, I believe the most humane thing to do would be to let the mother die and then get the fetus out or let the fetus die and then remove it.
I’m Tia, I’m pro-choice, convince me otherwise. (I’m being serious, try to convince me)
I totally understand what you mean. If a baby was at 7 months and someone wanted to abort them, I think that's wrong(unless the child will have serious health issues). But I don't see it as a baby at 4 weeks. If it could live outside of the womb, it's a baby. And what if it will grow up in the worst conditions and the mother knows that? What if she has an abusive husband that she knows will rape and beat that child? And thanks for answering so kindly...most people get extremely rude ☺️🤍
I'll admit I don't have all the facts. I'm a young teen just figuring out my way around the world so pls cut me some slack if I'm wrong.
Abortion is literally killing a living entity. It is defenceless, even though it can't scream or cry, it is still alive. The first heartbeat to my knowledge is around the 5 week as well as any brain activity. The fetus can feel pain and have nerve response around the 7th week. Even though, it's not instant, life is created from the instant the organism starts to grow. To then kill that living organism seems unjust and immoral.
The thing that many ppl don't recognize is the toll it can take on the aborter. Severe depression and feeling of loss is quite common. Many commit suicide over the guilt. To not only take a life which then could potentially take yours doesn't seem worth it in my eyes.
There are many solutions that can alternate from aborting. For instance giving the baby up for adoption.
In the end tho, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, I may agree with this, but many may not. If you are looking into this however, I would suggest looking into studies rather than read comments and blog posts as they are opinionated and biased (like this one). I understand that this change your mine, but I hope it gives you some insight on why I belive in pro-life
Joshua. I see where you are coming from, but that fetus is just as alive at five weeks as any sperm. Does that mean sex in general should be illegal since it's "killing" the sperm.
Sorry if I sound rude in this, tone is difficult to type, I don't mean to be mean at all.
I'm also a young teen, my opinions are most likely going to change as I do.
kudo. Thanks for answer.
So, I see we think extremely different. You say the fetus is alive as soon as the egg is fertilized, I don't believe it is alive, that's why I'm pro choice. I don't see it as "an innocent baby being ripped out of the womb just to be murdered." I see it as cells, yes, I know we are all made of cells, but that fetus is JUST cells.
I'm going to say a quote, "Is taking a seed from the ground equivalent to cutting down a tree?" Absolutely not, that seed had a very high chance of becoming a tree, and trees are nice. But what if that seed is beside a full grown tree, the seed came from that tree. The tree beside the seed has lived a life, but if that seed should grow, the tree beside it falls. Let's say the tree beside it lives, but the seed that is now a tree, is rotting, it's dying.
Someone could have taken the seed from the ground instead of letting it grow up in a bad environment. Nobody can change the ground it's growing in, they can tell people, but that may do more harm than good. (This is an abusive relationship I'm referring to)
And it's not making it easier on the mother, abortion is rough, but so is giving birth to the child and giving it up because the child will grow up in a bad environment.
One thing that made me a little upset about what you said was "she should close her legs." That statement is wildly saddening. A woman shouldn't not have sex because it's HER that is going to be stuck with the problem if she gets pregnant.
Thanks again
Do you still debate on this? @Creep
The shepherd drives the wolf from the sheep's throat, for which the sheep thanks the shepherd as his liberator, while the wolf denounces him for the same act as the destroyer of liberty. Plainly, the sheep and the wolf are not agreed upon a definition of liberty.
The way I would change his mind is by proving he is not really pro life.
Its simple: Life and murder are defined in whatever way is most convenient to women's 'free choice'. If she has a baby, she has constrained all he rpossible futures heavily. This constraint is considered wrong. Therefore abortion must be legal. But to be legal, the fetus must not be a person. Therefore abortion is not the killing of a person. its that simple.
it just bothers me how this is supposed to be a "change MY mind" discussion and he barely lets the opposer speak. It's like if i am watching a straight lecture about the pro-life side. At least interview people until both sides are evenly discussed.
This was a compilation. If you watch the original videos in the description - you will see both sides
This is why leftists hate him so much. He's a genuine human being who literally just wants to hear the opinions of others and have friendly conversations. And that's why I no longer like Ethan Klein, he took advantage of Steven's desire to have a genuine conversation so he could try to punk him.
Really! Your steven crowder dodged every single time Sam had tried to talk with and Ethan epicly trolled him by letting Sam which proved once Crowder meets a superior individual he runs off like a fraidy cat. #Coldfeetcrowder
@@ajaycyriljose9419 Brothe h3 guy brought someone else to debate for him that's a pushy move. And crowder said something about having people on his show and how they need half of if not more viewership compared to him
Ethan Klein seemed like a pretty cool guy until I heard him make comments suggesting fire bombing an NRA convention and then also making jokes about Ben Shapiro getting gassed to death. He was also for naively trusting the CDC's simple narrative on vaccines while largely ignoring the opinions of many other mainstream doctors and scientists who had good reasons to disagree.
Hes not trying to have a genuine conversation though, hes trying to overload the conversation with gobbledeygook and logic games that don't actually hold out. For another example of this watch how he approaches the conversation with his heavily pregnant wife when he abuses her.
@@funkychicken4509 I'm still neutral on that until we learn more. But the left is going absolutely BONKERS over the fact that they FINALLY have something to rip into him about.
I dont understand this complation
I watched 2 hours of film and then chose the best parts and put them together, so if people would like to watch 8 minutes rather than 2 hours, then can watch the video.
I'm prochoice only because it is not societies burden to care for a child that the parents themselves won't care for. Why should our tax paying dollars fund a child that the parents never wanted to begin with? Statistically speaking what happens to orphans or children that are neglected? Do they more often than not become productive members of society? I don't believe they do... overwhelmingly speaking... so that is why I leave it to the parent's judgement if they are going to care for the child or not. It is not any concern of mine to dictate if someone can or can't have an abortion. I personally would never want my spouse to have one because I would care for any child, I helped create.... but I wouldn't ask society to care for my child if I chose not to. Especially since we see how well society cares for these children after they are born. Right wingers love feeling high and mighty saving fetus' but don't give a shit after they are born because then it's too late to undo it. LOL If the neglected and orphan children start getting more help from society so they become productive members of society I'll change my mind. How about when our country is no longer the world leader in incarcerations per capita then I'll start listening to prolife speakers. Sometimes you have to fix other problems before other problems will self-correct themselves. :) This problem will self-correct itself when poverty and crime diminishes, and education improves. Is it morally wrong? of course it is.... but everyone on this planet outside of our Savior does morally wrong things. In the Bible it says thou shall not lie, steal, cheat or kill.... I don't remember it saying abortions... but it does say thou shall not kill.... but war is okay to kill? Their are grey areas that even the bible doesn't have answers for so as a society we need to find what the true answers are. To really understand the opposite side of a discussion... ask yourself instead.... why would anyone want to have an abortion? Then you might find some understanding even if you don't agree with it. One more point.... didn't god test Abraham to kill his son but at the last second intervened and told him he was just testing his faith or some nonsense? What if Abraham didn't stop in time? Why did god contradict himself saying thou shall not kill then tell Abraham to kill? Why did god kill all the first born children of Egypt (those children were innocent themselves weren't they?) This is probably blasphemy but god seems to be a good killer for someone so Benevolent...? Mic drop...If god can kill the first born children of Egypt... I believe the parents can decide if they want to have an abortion or not. I commit sins so I can't bestow my beliefs on anyone else via a religious channel.:)
Is he trying to change her mind? Listening to her gave me a headache. If she's pro choice just say that, beating around the bush and sugar coating is annoying.
If we don't know/not yet determined/defined specificly what (another) life exactly IS, WHY say that abortion IS murder, define LIFE first..till then i think you cannot say that a pregnant woman is "killing another life" when she decides that she wants to have an abortion...he's comparing a foetus or an embryo with a man that crosses the street..really??
look it up. Science determined life ends when the heart stops beating and the brain is legally dead. BEing that is the case, it is therefore conistent to conclude that life begins when a heart starts beating and brainwaves are detected. Those things are indeed present within the first 6 weeks of a baby's first trimester, during the period where abortion is considered LEGAL. Therefore based on Science' findings, abortion indeed IS murder.
alazmat films..You said: when the brain is legally dead"..From what moment can you call it "a life"...LEGALLY?Can you call it "Life" when it's not yet viable outside the mother s womb/uterus?can you call it life when it LEGALLY has not yet existed?
Souldier2011 are you saying Science is wrong?
alazmat films.. i'm saying:the outcome through decent scientific research is never wrong, what you do with the outcome makes the difference..it partially depends on the cultural standards and values of the country you live in ,...when you scientificly determine that there is a heartbeat, that's one thing..but the question if you can legally call it viable independent life/murder if you choose for an abortion is another one imho..i live in the netherlands and over here abortion isn't considered to be murder..hell it is legal to abort a pregnancy if a woman wishes to do so..over here women are indeed pro life, THEIR OWN LIFE that is..and according to dutch law they have every right to do it...and i fully agree. If your personal opinion is that abortion is equal to murder, and based on that believe you would never choose abortion if you are to be pregnant, that is fine, but my body=my choice, even if it means that a clump of cells with a heartbeat (and what others would call "life") must be removed from inside of me (if i was a pregnant
woman), than so be it..
Actually textbook after textbook states that life begins at the zygote. That’s at the moment of conception. Science tells us that.
if you're pro life i hope youre anti execution lol and anti self defense. there's no circumstance to take anothers life right?
An “innocent life”
Anti self defence? Wtf? Self defence is exactly the right to not be killed.
And how can you compare someone that will be executed because did something horrific, or someone that threadned someone life, with a baby that has no choice
🤦🏻♂️, oh my gosh here we go again, there’s no contradiction the argument is innocent life, somebody who was on death row is likely not innocent.
Reason tells us that a fetus is not a life possessing individual rights. ProLife is AntiLife
Alexander Evans science tells us otherwise.
@@Hyozon No it doesn't. Explain. #StopDistortingScience
@@Hyozon #AsIfYouGiveAShitAboutScience
The receipts:
Biological Principles and Modern Practice of Obstetrics by Greenhill and Friedman: W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1974
Essentials of Human Embryology by Keith L. Moore, Toronto: B.C. Decker Inc, 1988
Life Before Birth by England, Marjorie A., 2nd ed. England: Mosby-Wolfe, 1996
Human Embryology by William J. Larsen, 3rd edition, 2001
The Developing Human Being by Keith Moore and T.V.N. Persaud, 7th edition, 2003
Langman’s Medical Embryology by T. W. Sadler, 9th edition, 2004
Shall I go on? I can list the page numbers if you don’t care to read them yourself.
Funny how he treats his pregnant wife though huh?