The Murder of Laci Peterson - Scott's version
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024
- The Murder of Laci Peterson - Scott's version
Our merch: my-store-d4ffb...
Support Bad Things on Patreon: / badthingsbad Things: True Crime is a channel with all things true crime and mystery! Subscribe to stay updated on the most interesting true crime cases out there.
⚠️ Copyright Disclaimers
• Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”
• We use images and content in accordance with the RUclips Fair Use copyright guidelines
#badthings
Pathological liar. This guys even had the nerve to say his hair was lightened because he was swimming at his friend's pool!😂😂😂 Seriously thought people would believe all of his ridiculous lies.
I can't believe that's not true! I'm literally speechless! & Here was me about to go looking for a pool as I'm wanting bleached blonde hair! Maybe an afro? What a bad boy!
He is a liar and he is "cheat", but is he a killer?
@kirkjurgens3137 Uhh, yeah....there is no other way to explain ALL of his behavior! If you have any REAL knowledge of this case, you wouldn't even question it.
@@realhousewifeoftransylvania1.0 The SP supporters are on the warpath. Some channels that deal with this have an inordinately large number of commenters who are certain that he's not guilty. They cut and paste lengthy pages from the trial transcripts and insult you if you disagree with them. This whole debacle is such a waste of money and resources and puts the Rocha family through hell once again. But it's getting a lot of publicity, isn't it?
Ppl@@peterj5106
To many coincidences for Scott Peterson to be Innocent. I think he is Guilty and the L.A. Innocence Project are waisting their time.
They are also wasting their time.
just like wasting your time with this stupid robo voice video
I once heard about someone who wasted their time but if I remember correctly he managed to get it again. Yea, if he's smashing the ol' porno channels while playing golf in his boat I dunno if he would be trustworthy? Probably not I'm thinking but I may be wrong! But I don't think I am!
😂
Agree !
I would never understand why people think he’s “innocent”. Let’s speak facts…
-Caught in a pair of pliers recovered from Peterson’s boat, police found hair matched to Laci’s through mitochondrial DNA testing, an inconclusive but still genetic match but Laci allegedly never knew about the boat.
-Although he originally lied and told police he left home on Christmas Eve at 9:30 am, cellphone records placed him at or near home at 10:08 am, just 10 minutes before a neighbor found Laci’s dog running loose in the street and returned him to the Petersons’ yard. After eventually driving to Berkeley Marina and fishing there for less than an hour, he arrived back home at around 4:30 pm, washed his fishing clothes, ate some pizza, and then called Laci’s mother to tell her that her daughter was “missing.”
-He began researching fishing boats to buy on December 7, 2002. On December 8, he did extensive web searches for fishing supplies and tidal currents around the bay area, even zooming in on Brooks Island, where authorities believe he took Laci’s body on Christmas Eve.
-He paid cash for a small fishing boat on December 9, the same day that he told Amber Frey that he had “lost” his wife and that this would be his first Christmas without her. Lacy did not go missing until Dec 24th.
-Prosecutors also found evidence that he’d made multiple cement anchors, only one of which was located, and which they believed he used to weigh down Laci’s body.
-He made repeated non-fishing trips to the marina, 90 miles away, only to “stare into the bay” and then leave again after a few minutes. This was in January, months before Laci’s body would eventually be found in the bay.
-The same day their bodies were identified, Scott Peterson dyed his hair, borrowed his brother’s photo ID, and headed for the Mexico border with over $10,000 in cash.
And this is not even the end of all the evidence in this case. Also so many questionable actions during Lacy’s disappearance.
-Who leaves a pregnant wife all alone and go fishing on a foggy cold windy weather in the bay on Christmas Eve?
-Why would he right away classify Lacy as “missing” when calling her mom that day rather than saying “She’s not here or I can’t get a hold of her or have you seen her?”
-Why would he sell her car or try and sell their home before she was even found? It’s like he knew she wasn’t coming back home.
-Why was he not actively participating in her search or volunteer to do a polygraph test?
Shame on people thinking he’s innocent. He either killed her himself or he hired some people to do it for him, but he definitely had a role in Lacy’s murder.
Just a note, the LA Innocence Project is wholly independent of The Innocence Project.
Yeah I dont know how they get away with naming it that. It's intentionally confusing.
Probably a sign of how sketchy they are tbh
We know. We know. That’s been said a million times on channel after channel since it was announced and confused many people.
All of the IP’s within the Innocence Network are affiliated. The LAIP is one of 70 innocence orgs within the network. The OG, New York based IP, created the network.
BUT...according to Brennan, the California Innocence Project - who Janey Peterson has ties to - *isn't* affiliated with the LAIP 😂😂😂
Sure 👌🥴
@@brennanhuff2960 the LA Innocence Project is wholly independent of The Innocence Project.
BTW - this motive has nothing to do with his affairs. He had affairs before her, and possibly affairs at the same time as Amber! This is because Scott Peterson is a babied manchild who grew up. His mommy took care of him, then Laci took care of him. Did his laundry, cleaned house, stroked his massive ego. What happens when you have a child? You have to start acting like a father & not a man baby! He didn’t want a child, ever. The closer it got to Laci giving birth, the more panicked he was getting that his Playboy bull-s**t lifestyle was going to end! A child means responsibility, no more late nights, less money, probably less girlfriends. This is not about Laci, this is about Connor. He did NOT want that kid-end of story!
That ashole didn't want a child, got tired of Lacy, didn't want a divorce, didn't want to pay child support, alimony, lawyers fee, and didn't want to lose half of the marriage property ...
In a nutshell, as far as motive is concerned, Peterson had half a million reasons to kill.
I think that you are right.
You sound angry. You must have gotten cheated on.
Exactly. He even told Amber Fry that he "didn't want to have kids", and wanted "a vasectomy". He simply didn't want to be a father, that's all. He wasn't willing to give up his bachelor-type freedom for a baby, and thought the easiest way out was to get rid of both mother and child. Not only that, the man's a coward. Wanting or not children in your relationship is something that has to be discussed before marriage. It's very clear, from interviews given by Laci's parents, that she had always wanted to become a mother. I'm sure she mentioned it while dating Scott. Why didn't he say anything? Such a coward...
@@kharrington5268 I don't think she sounds angry--she's simply passionate about this case and its ramifications. And exclamation points don't usually signify anger or derision. Now using all caps: That's another story.
Two things that stand out that point to Scott being responsible:
1) Laci was 8 1/2 months pregnant and due to deliver in a couple of weeks. Her lower back and feet were probably aching, and she was probably exhausted beyond words--especially when she probably had to pee every half hour! She was not going on a 2-mile trek with a dog; she wanted to stay home and rest until the party.
2) The dog. Laci had a Golden Lab who was faithful to her. Had anyone attempted to abduct her, the dog would've laid his life down or torn the person up. After watching Laci get abducted, the dog would've been pacing, whining, and in distress--along with having bloody evidence on his muzzle and fur. However, Scott could've put the dog outside during his fight with Laci. The dog, upset by the loud voices, could've opened the gate to look for someone to help--hence, everyone recalls seeing the dog but not Laci. Scott cleaned up, brought the dog in, and when he left to dispose of the bodies, he left the gate open so the dog would be roaming around to help give him an alibi.
It was either that, or he paid the two men to abduct Laci. There is no middle road.
Look i believe Scott did this but the Golden Lab theory you have is a bit wild.
He's guilty as fuq. Dyes his hair? 15K USD, survival kit, changes of clothes are found in his truck? Tells mistress "he's a widower"? Was very mortified about becoming a father? Those are all circumstantial evidence, yes, but it shows what a pathological liar he is.
If a guy thought that anyone would believe him when he said his hair was bleached from taking a swim in a chlorinated pool, then why the hell should anyone believe *anything* he says?
Peterson either had a terrible bout of coincidental events that line up perfectly for his guilt, or he’s guilty. He’s guilty folks.
Think he did it?
He told everyone he was playing golf, literally an hour after he was fishing. The umbrellas were never even unloaded, they were just a way to hide her body on the drive. He makes my skin crawl. Guilty pos.
Yes. That was why the umbrellas
Of course he is guilty! Fishing?!! The same place the bodies were found? Lying about going fishing? Come on people.
That is one of the strongest circumstantial pieces that I have heard, in my view. I have to review the case since it has been so long. And hear any new evidence. He has been convicted once already.
My aunt moved up to that area a couple years before this happened. She read the newspaper every day religiously, cover to cover, and was a bit of a hoarder with them, never throwing them away. After all this happened, she showed me several articles about other bodies that were found in the area prior to Lacy. Some of them with very similar circumstances, pregnant women found and at least one time an unborn fetus was found separately. My aunt is dead now but she and several of her coworkers were convinced he was innocent and there was a serial killer up there preying on pregnant women, maybe trying to unsuccessfully take their babies. I only ever saw one media story mention these other murders right after Lacy was found. They all seemed to ignore them after the story blew up nationally. Of course it's possible Scott knew about these other killings and tried to model hers after them. But it's also possible he's a victim of bad luck and his wife was coincidentally a target and victim of the same serial killer.
@bccsivxx-xxivvii thank you for sharing that. Very interesting. Did you keep any clippings from your Aunt's stash?
@@americatruecrime na, she died several years later and it wasn't on the top of my mind. I'm not sure she kept them when she moved back to Texas. If she did, her kids probably threw everything like that away. I do have a subscription to newspapers online now and have tried to search for them. It's really difficult sifting through all the results though. I'm curious to see if this innocence project organization that's helping him brings it up. One of the reasons I've been trying to follow the story.
@@bccsivxx-xxivvii they would like to hear your story, I'm sure.
Why would a very pregnant woman walk the dog when medical professionals advised against it? If she did, why would she not take her phone in case of an emergency? Scott is guilty. Full stop.
Laci’s doctor didn’t advise against going for walks. She was told to either stop walking or go a little later in the day after she’d had time better hydrated herself. This was a month and a half before her disappearance. In the beginning of December she told her good friend Kristen Reed she had started walking again because she was concerned about her weight gain.
Obviously Laci wasn’t one to carry her cell phone with her on walks. Her mom got on her case about it after the first time Laci felt poorly on a walk, then she went on a walk again without it.
@@Bet920 Yeah no. The only “walking shoes” they found in the home were a pair of slip on sling tennies. Those are not walking shoes.
Kristen Dempewolf is who you’re referring to, and her walk didn’t take her over on La Loma Avenue where many witnesses saw a pregnant woman walking a dog that was giving her some trouble controlling (exactly as the Peterson’s dog Mckenzi was described to behave on a leash). The police never found the woman who was supposedly mistaken for Laci and they combed that entire neighborhood looking for her.
@@Bet920 I do because I don’t think Laci was a snowflake who couldn’t walk a spirited dog on a leash. She’s taken walks with the dog and her mom before, and she also told her friend Kristen that she would go for walks with the dog.
@@Bet920 Laci was running all kinds of errands the day before she disappeared. She offered and had plans to host a Christmas brunch for her family. Of course she was exhausted. She was at the tail end of her pregnancy. That doesn’t mean she wasn’t capable of being productive. She wasn’t disabled for Pete’s sake. 🙄
@@Bet920 Because?
at some point you have to bring statistical probability into it as the likelihood of every circumstance happening to Scott is way beyond a "beyond a reasonable doubt". If he is innocent, he is one of the most extreme outliers ever - and one of the unluckiest cheaters and liars of all time.
I think it is important to state that the death penalty was eliminated in California which is why his conviction was converted to life in prison.
His death sentence was overturned due to an error made by the judge during jury selection.
@@sophie8394 yes that’s true but they also abolished the death sentence in California all together. So every inmate with a death sentence in the state had their sentences commuted to life without parole not just Scott. He would have had this sentence regardless……. Capital punishment is not allowed to be carried out in the U.S. state of California, due to both a standing 2006 federal court order against the practice and a 2019 moratorium on executions ordered by Governor Gavin Newsom.
He's absolutely guilty
The Prosecuters podcast goes over this case really well in a no-nonsense way.
There's also people who believe the 🌎 is flat. Scott is as guilty as sin.
You don't have to be "100% certain"-It's beyond a reasonable doubt and there is TONS of circumstantial evidence in the case.
Wouldnt the police be around the Peterson house by the 26th so highly unlikely the burglars chose that day to burgle the house across the road meaning it must have happened earlier?
Not at 3am when the burglary occurred.
Yeah apparently the burglars came back between 6:30-7am and wheeled a safe from the house on a dolly to a car parked on the street, and did so with media down the street. 🥴
Ohhhhhh!!! The media was "down the street" now 🤣🤣🤣
I guess you can't keep repeating the lie that Ted Rowlands was directly in front of the Peterson and Medina homes anymore now that he was finally told the truth about that after 21 years 🤣
And yes, Steven Todd described Ted Rowlands news truck and exactly where it was parked on the morning of the 26th when they returned to the Medina's in a borrowed car to retrieve the safe they had left behind.
Please tell me it wasn't Turd burgler's! Omg! Has anyone heard from Stinkie Pinkie? Or the Phantom? Ooohh....oh no! I can't get hold of Mr Hanky! The X-Maz poo.
It was Christmas Eve
HE GUILTY
Tell LAIP that.
@@steelhurricane4041they'll figure it out.
@@sophie8394whatcha mean? 😮🤔
@@steelhurricane4041 I'm sure the LAIP is crapping themselves now that the states opposition is out, proving their claims are just more lies.
Only someone who lacks critical thinking abilities and common sense would think he’s innocent…may he rot in San Quentin. Justice served for Laci and Conner.
Think he did it?
He didn't want anyone to know he was at the Marina. Golfing was going to be his alibi. However, when he knew he was seen at the Marina launching his boat, he had to change his alibi. He said it was an unplanned trip, yet he purchased the fishing license a few days before and was for only 2 days. He's a scum bag cheating liar but that's not what made him guilty. Amber Frey delivered the motive but the evidence all points to Scott - there could have been no one else who killed Laci. All theories have been debunked - both at the original trail as well in the several attempts he and his sister in law, Janie, have attempted. The attempts have all been based on lies and spinning the truth. One has to ask themselves would a pregnant woman approach burglars when she could call the police from the safety of her own home. Would drug addicted burglars - who had no car - one of them was casing possible houses to rob on his bike!!! The car they borrowed to get the safe belonged to a mother of one of the burglars, kidnap and murder a pregnant woman and hold her hoping the media would provide a story that they could use to frame him? Would they drive her 90 miles away - they would have to borrow a car - get a boat - and go to a place they probably had never been before (without being seen) and dump her body. AND wouldn't they want her to be found right away given they were framing her husband? But instead they weighed her down so she could not be found!!! Let's use some logic - he's 100% guilty no doubt about it. The golden boy didn't want to be a dad. He would be losing all the attention he has been used to getting to a baby. He would have stayed married and cheated on Laci until she had enough and divorced him if she had not gotten pregnant. He will keep making attempts to free himself - he loves the attention and he has nothing better to do - nothing to lose - he already killed what should have been most important to him.
If he gets a new trial he'll be found guilty again IMO
Her purse and keys were found in a closet? The video made it look like it was tossed in bedroom closet. Sounds like Scott did that...who else would?
@BadThingsTrueCrime, I like your video. When you say at the end that you are not 100% certain he did it, are you equating "beyond reasonable doubt" to being 100% that someone committed a crime? In other words, do you hold that a juror needs to be 100% sure a person is guilty of murder before voting guilty?
Guilty as hell dozens of reasons point Scott and no one else ....
Like the last thing he was interested in when she was " missing " was finding her
Like selling Laci's car ... trying to sell their house...
getting triple XXX porn for himself because he knew she wasn't coming home and she didn't like porn at all....
Like telling Amber " French" Frey " after January 27th it's just you and me baby "
Like telling his wife's sister " I was hoping for infertility "
Like saying to another woman " I'm looking for a new soulmate "
Like flirting with his sisters babysitter and making " sex tinies "
Like getting ready to flee to Mexico with fake ID ...15 thousand dollars cash and a handgun ...
Like referring to his wife ( in the past tense " she WAS a great person "
Like going back to where he dumped her body to check the progress of the search for her body ....he wasn't " fishing " with these 90 miles trips...he was sweating out the investigation... because Scott the murderer and only Scott put her there ...
Many others lies and bull shit stories about what happened and what he did ...
But the one that absolutely proves he and no one else
Telling his girlfriend Amber Frey " this will be my first Christmas without my wife " two weeks before she went missing....
I agree, Scott Peterson is 100% guilty, no question.. A dumb arrogant psychopath.
The majority of criminal cases are circumstantial. I’m surprised you aren’t aware of that considering the nature of your channel
Are you referencing something said in the video? Thank you.
@@americatruecrime Yes. Your final comments on the video. There is only circumstantial evidence so we can’t say for sure Scott Peterson is guilty. It’s the same stance innocent fraud takes. That no case can be decided with only circumstantial evidence. That’s wrong. Guilt or innocence is established by circumstantial evidence through reasoning. It’s setting a dangerous precedence.
@@americatruecrime Yes. The end of your video. You’re taking the same stance innocence fraud does that there isn’t enough concrete evidence so there is reasonable doubt. That’s wrong and sets a dangerous precedence. The majority of criminal cases are circumstantial. Guilt or innocence is established by circumstantial evidence through reasoning.
@@allwayscgood576 hello. While it is not my video, I appreciate the thoughtful response. I will listen to his video again. I do agree with you that circumstantial evidence convicts many, it is what is looked to and relied upon when hard-core proof is not present. Thank you.
@@allwayscgood576 I will be very interested to see what the hearing that Peterson has been granted reveals.
This is the video that convinced me. Thank you for amazing work.
So, what happened to Laci's head, arms, & internal organs?
Wow, so that’s your defense of Scott?
You honestly can’t figure that out? Her limbs were weighed down by the anchors he made. Her torso eventually broke away from her limbs since she was, you know, IN THE OCEAN for months. Sea animals ate her organs. It’s obvious.
@@robs1873 um no. Scott is as guilty as sin. I had never heard that her internal organs were missing until now. I was just asking. Why is everyone so worked up because I asked where her fucking head & organs went?
@@karenc71940
@katie3657 Cause that's what everyone online does when anyone has a simple question that they think might be against what their opinion is. Ridiculous.
Only Scott Peterson knows the truth...
He is full of it!
Full of what?
That's a guilty man if i ever saw one.
He did it.
Actually, I've been doing a lot of research on this case and have come to the conclusion that there isn't one piece of hard evidence that supports Scott killing his wife and unborn son, just a lot of circumstantial evidence. He was basically tried and convicted in the media and when Amber Frye revealed herself, he didn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of getting a fair trial. He's a jerk and an adulterer. but that doesn't make him a killer.
What would his lifestyle be if he were released?
My Mother said "What a wicked man he was".......
This dude should be lucky he's not still not sitting on death row. I've actually never saw a case that had more indirect evidence that pointed to the guilt of one person than this one. The amount of circumstantial evidence against Scott Peterson is so mind-staggering that it's almost comical.
Don't be too sure. Do you really know all the details? I thoug😮ht he was guilty until I started delving into the case. Now I am not sure.
@@luisagallarotti9188 brah....there's never been anyone in the history of American jurisprudence that's been as guilty as this guy.
Ok
How fortunate you are to be omniscient. I hope you are right otherwise Peterson would be only one of the many innocent people in jail
@@luisagallarotti9188 dude, it's not supernatural power...it's called going to trial and presenting evidence. It's actually not that complicated.
@@scott6828 Well if it's not that complicated as you say why are there so many innocent people in jail. Actually it is a complicated process n you are over simplifying. Why don't we just wait to see the new evidence? You might be right but I could be right too. Why are you so intense about this? Isn't the important thing finding out the truth? Let's calm down n see the DNA results ok?
You are my fave true crime channel
so many others interject their personal issues and put on a big act of being appalled and make it all about them
this channel cuts right to the chase and delivers
thank you
Can Innocence Project make mattress testing on their own? Court approved for tape only.
He would be 21 today 🥺
Thank you.
Ur welcome 👍
It is not the job of the justice system to establish 100 per cent certainty. He is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and was declared so by he courts. Why all this revisiting of these obvious murderers? There are so many in your prison system who really are innocent just rotting there. Scott deserved his sentence and is exactly where he should be. Otherwise, what you're really saying is that if these people avoid the Death Penalty, then there is a good chance they will be declared 'innocent' and let out of prison. How shameful a statement that is on American Jurisprudence.
Sorry, love this channel but I will never watch Scott’s version or Casey’s version or OJ’s version because they’re all so clearly guilty and to hear more of their lies makes me sick.
If he's innocent, he is THE unluckiest innocent person ever with all of that evidence stacked against him. Dude is so very guilty IMO.
he's beyond guilty
He's guilty of having an affair not murder! There's no evidence of murder!
Scott killed his wife
Very odd. I think he's guilty. But the police should have tested the blood in the van to eliminate that scene.
Blood was tested and it’s a males DNA. That’s why the judge refused to retest.
Strange case, he’s a sketchy guy but they’re definitely some loose ends… jury was sketchy too… interested to see how this turns out…
Cue angry ppl responses lol
Oh you!! (Shaking my fist)
(Angry glare) 😠 how dare you... 😇
How was the jury sketchy?
He didn't want a child. He no longer wanted to be married. He didn't want a divorce because his lies and fianaces would come to light. In a nutshell: he didn't want Laci and Conner, but he didn't want anyone else to have them, either.
@@katemaloney4296 Just like Chris Watts.
Seven months before the disappearance of Laci Peterson, a pregnant San Francisco woman, and her child disappeared and 7 more in few years 🤔
Where did you hear about all of these other women?
@@sophie8394 I’m sure you’ve heard of Evelyn Hernandez haven’t you?
@@AnelaEllaEh I have. I'm asking where you heard about the other 7 women.
@@sophie8394 Read about it researched like a geek that I am. Toni Danieelle Clark she was two months pregnant, there was another one Consuelo Lomeli I believe 8 months pregnant. Some people believe there was a serial killer in the area between 1971-2003
@@sophie8394 I’m typing but it won’t send 🤷🏻♀️ haha I did a little bit of research about same area and it’s said that there may have been a serial killer between 1971 and 2003
Well...after all Scott was a Fertilizer Salesman...if you get my drift
Occam's Razor: He did it
I think his guilty of killing his wife
8:20 oh you forgot to add the maintenance guys said if anything was in Scott’s boat they would of saw it. The murder of Laci Peterson A&E documentary on Hulu.
Ya. That never happened.
Too many lies from SP equals a liar.
2:34 they saw each other a total of 4 times
You really fell for the Peterson family documentary huh?
7:10 wrong
Not likely
I was called for jury duty and I was brought before the prosecutors and defense teams and I was excused almost immediately. I mentioned that I would be biased against the prosecutors for two reasons. The first being this case and the other was another case of a man being sent to prison on here-say; that is a woman's testimony that got him sent to prison and she only served six months in jail for perjury after ruining a man's life.
IF SOMEONE IS FALSELY CONVICTED THEN BOTH THE POLICE AND THE PROSECUTORS MUCH BE SEVERELY PUNISHED!!!!! NO IFS, ANDS, OR BUTS!!!!! WE THE PEOPLE MUST HOLD THE POLICE, THE PROSECUTORS AND THE STATE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS AND THEIR MISTAKES ESPECIALLY WHEN EVIDENCE THAT COULD EXONERATE THE DEFENDANT IS WITHHELD!!
You need to watch True Crime Matters w Tara Marie. She breaks down the Evidence piece by piece. Scott may be innocent. He was convicted for being a cheating liar, and he told another mistress that his wife was dead.
You are pimping that garbage all over RUclips.
Is she paying you or something?
😂😂
No. She’s the only one who has objectively broken the evidence down. I think Scott deserves a fair trial.
@vanessamonroe1917, I will check that channel out. I am not familiar with it. Can you answer the question I posed to the video creator just now about their 100% remark at the last minute of this video? Thank you.
He was introduced to Amber by a mutual friend. Didn't she know he was married...
@@tatianapavel9858 no. He lied to her too.
Hes innocent. No evidence
No evidence 😂😂😂😂
@ 4:07 you said PM, but you meant AM.
You lost me when you said Lucy instead of Laci!
Scott is innocent. Ya'll are just haters
Circumstantial evidence is evidence. Yeah, it makes since she would stop walking the dog when pregnant. Sometimes the doctors tell women to stop alot of exercise towards the end. It can cause the baby to get tied up in the umbilical cord. Sometimes not all. It happened with my sister.The cord got wrapped around her neck. Parents delivered meals to mature age people in Cliffton,AZ. The terrain is similar to Afganistan. No joke.,LOL
F'r eats cold or reheated pizza. Must be guilty!
He did it
Where in his timeline does it show his innocence ?
That girl Amber totally knew he was married GTFO
I doubted she knew. We have to understand that this happened during the days were social media was not a thing, people could not just easily access someone’s life activities, not everybody had a cell phone and to get your news you either had to buy a newspaper or watch your local TV news.
Plus as soon as she heard she contacted the authorities and volunteered to take a polygraph test in which she passed.
Anyone can be innocent
Cops make mistakes 😛
I often play Golf on my boat! It's 14 foot long so plenty of room for 2 to play! I always win tho! Maybe because it's only me who knows the rules & I only tell them to my opponent as we're playing, but.... I've always won by then anyways. That's why I'm champion of the World for boat golf! If it's rough weather I'll wear my cement shoes for safety reasons! I made them myself but maybe they're too big? It takes a crane or 4x4 pickup to move them but I bet I'll be glad of them someday.
Absolute waste of money and resources
Yes Scott did not do it but he fears the man who did
She talked about her plans for the day for 62 minutes? Let him out!
Scott and OJ Simpson are innocent
2:30 , " lacy would give birth in 2003" jesus did u even do any research into this case before posting utter BS , Lacy never gave birth, you are very unprofessional, get your f facts straight, and her name is Lacy NOT lucy
On the thumbnail put 2 horns on top of scotts head and yes you got the murderer!!!!