My Biggest FEAR for World of Tanks
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 апр 2024
- Today quenale will show my biggest fear for the future of World of Tanks! Here's what terrifies me might happen.
SUBSCRIBE for more videos!: ►goo.gl/5VIiJn
SPONSOR THE CHANNEL: ►goo.gl/64hgbN
T-SHIRTS: ►goo.gl/s2OINq
LIVESTREAMS: Mondays, Tuesdays, Fridays and Sundays for 6 hours+ Starting @ 17:00-CET / 16:00-GMT / 11:00-EST
► / quickybaby
Twitter ► / quickybaby
Instagram ► / quickybabytv
Facebook ► / quickybaby
QuickyBaby's FAQ
►goo.gl/4Mi8wj
___
World of Tanks is a Free 2 Play online game published by Wargaming start playing World of Tanks here: bit.ly/NewTanker (affiliate link) 
Игры
Of course they will make op tier 9s. why would they not?
That's what they did with tier 8s for years.
Its not even a question its a fact. they will do it.
And then tier 9 is filled they take tier 10, tier 7, tier 6 and so on
probably add tier 11 at some point so tier 9 becomes tier 8 :-D
@@qyzxger790 that's literally how they would ''save'' / extend the life time of WOT. Adding more tiers. In my opinion. Going more modern and modern tanks with higher tiers. Just like STB-1 should not even be in the game because its to modern. looking at the history.
@@MaxFiveGames well i would like a more modern version. 😀 BUT it can be seperate Matchmaking...
so you will meet more tier 9s in tier 10 then.
6:35 i´ve met guys that left the game after a decade and hundreds of dollars into it. But its more because WG keep ignoring problems for YEARS, people hated stun mechanic from the beggining, it took them an entire year to nerf the Obj268v4, the Leffefe keeps ruining tier 5 games, the keep adding hull down tanks and hull down locations.
For me the ice on the cake was refusing to nerf premium tanks, but having no problem BUFFING THE OLD ONES.
Wargaming is a company that, for no discernible reason, keeps ignoring the comunity, refusing to yield 80% of the times no matter how much backlash they receive. Both HE & Progetto 65 nerfs, and the crew 2.0 were received badly with little to no support, and yet they eventually nerfed HE, nerfed the Progetto (releasing the Lion the same month was the cherry on top) and the keep steadily moving towards crew 2.0.
Why do all big game companies do this? From WG to Riot, or Gaijin?? In all of them i see the same disdain for player feedback.
They actually listen to war thunder players Because those players are on strike, and then the game is pretty much dead. If only WoT players did the same, maybe WoT will listening
Whatever they do, the main reason behind it is money
i totally agree with you, but the problem is they dont care because they can do what they want, because the community still continues playing and buying everything wg spits out
Sunken cost + niche theme. They know they sell this to absolute whales AND complete ftp masses. The whales stay due to sunken cost and having no comparable tank game, ftp player are food for the whales and easily replaceable.
No need to listen to any of those groups.
@@cmdrTic but there are problems like arty or the huldownification of world of tanks where the WALES are against it. I can understand making good premium tanks, i can understand Wot+, but i don't understand the "hum, 90% of our playerbase with more than 12 premium tanks (platerbase that spends money) is begging us to limit/nerf artillery... Well, thats a problem for next decade."
5:38 in my opinion it is pure greed, not cowardice or legal issues
Yea 100% the shit show that was the type 59 when they nerfed it proves that
@@kings_nemesis5995 The average qb viewer... As dumb as qb. No. The Type59 was never nerfed. The Type59 remained the exact same tank. What you don't realize is that the game changed. The game is faster now, tanks are more mobile on average, with more dmg, with higher pen, with more armor. The Type59 remained the same. If this helps you understand reality, then it's all good. If you don't understand.. Well, then just keep on spitting out bs statements as does qb.
@@moo8698 and typing this out does what exactly
They can't legally change a for cash item after its sold in EU so they won't anywhere. If they do they can be banned from operating in EU.
@@kings_nemesis5995 they did not nerf it nor did they nerf the super pershing, infact they BUFFED the type 59 because it wasnt overpowered enough being basically an obj 140 at tier 8.
Tier 7 and 9 used to be my favourites but seeing as though i like playing LT and MT, the addition of CVS to tier 8 tanks just makes tier 7 such a huge gap in tank performance. These days i prefer to play 9s so if they ruin that then goodbye WOT from a beta test player.
Yeah cvs should be available on any tier.
CVS is a problem and shouldn't even exist or at least it should only exist for LTs.
Wargaming will ruin T9 and then T10. After this, they will introduce T11 and T12.
t10 is already horrible
They already did this in world of warships with the super ships whi h are basically tier 11
chief and 279 e were essentially tier 11, now they're at like tier 10.5
@@adream3591 chief is like average tier 10 noe
T10 is so full of exagerated features on most of the tanks that it's already dull. Grind the same corner or camp the same bush for 5 years but drive a different tank that does the same thing but a bit better than the old one. This is the meta!
Playing tech tree tanks at t8 feels like shit
Depends on the tank. I played tiger 2 last night for about 20 battles and average 8800 wtr and 2200 damage. Even got my second mark of excellence. 😊
@@danimal865 no everyone is grinding the german heavy line. olmost every tech tree line is incredibly weak when compared to the large pool of overpowered premium tanks at each tier.
yep to many pay to win tanks at tier 8. everyone keeps giving them money so they will never nerf op pay to win tanks. infact they are doubling down on the pay to win by creating a casino match maker, those who spend more money will win more games. those who do not spend more money will lose. im free to play my winrate has gotten worse with the bad match maker because of it used to be 49 to 50 percent winrate
If WG can't nerf OP premiums, then they will eventually have to introduce a "Universal buff" for all tech-tree vehicles.
Nope, they don't.
Well they should but at the rate they take now it will be another 10 years before all the current tech tree tanks get buffed to be competitive
I agree, of course they should. But... playing this game for more than 10 years gives you a pretty good idea.
"Universal fix" would be to bump down a tier all tech tree tanks! T10 becomes tier 9 and so on, without any changes! BAM! Tier 8's against tier "9" will suddenly fix them!
powercreep is bad. it will be 3 minutes games with 15 -0 every time
Money vs player experience. I wonder what WG would choose. Hmm...
If the player experience is good they get more money, idk why they don't understand that
yep the game is pure pay to win. ever since they released type 59 and super pershing the game has been nothing but pay to win. and the worst part is people keep giving them money and thus supporting their continuous bad design decisions.
6:15, I find this increasingly more so a joke that cracks me up good. Everybody pretends like its with the BZ-176 the game "suddenly" got ruined.
But we've had in the game, by then, already: Borat, Progetto 46, Chief, Obj279e, Chrysler, Defender, E25, ... the sliding scale of tanks that are (or were) OP at the time of their release set that precedent of a bad game, with attrocious balancing LONG BEFORE the BZ-176 was concocted.
Cool move especially for the Defender: "we identified the tank is OP and we will never sell it again"... then they introduced the 252U... so I wonder, when we will the "non BZ-176 - ChinaDragon-Tank"
yep the game was pay to win moment super pershing and type 59 thats when wg knew they could get away releasing overpowered premiums. they also made the match maker rigged, paying players win more and free to paly players get unmarked bots on their team to lose more games.
If you think WG will see the problem and stop what they are doing then you are coping hard.
If u think it's a problem, then I'd say QB isn't the only one coping...
depends on what they think the problems are.
more like they know exactly what they are doing. pay to win gambling game with rigged match making. pay money win more games
He is not coping. He is strategizing how to benefit from it economically while keeping the “friendly” demeanor...
It's funny listening to QB complain about the BZ-176 when he was all supportive of the stupid go-carts, especially that premium at tier 8.
I see one solution, as a lot "OP" premium have bad standard pen, nerf all gold ammo in the game without nerfing the tank (or simply remove it, this ammo is so stupid anyway). Gold ammo should be a strategic choice not a easy mode button.
which they will never do because the game has always been about pay to win. most of the player base wants pay to win thats why they nerfed HE to force gold spam which means losing credits which means only paying players can afford spamming it. lets not forget about artillery that ruins the fun of the game and would have been removed if people closed their wallets from the start
Spamming gold ammo is available for free by just playing the game ( grinding credits ) . Pay to win is when you get something the normal players cant get without spending real money. Gold ammo is not pay to win. So its free to nerf gold ammo.
Not in high Tier without prem acc or your a unicorn@@niklas3677
@@niklas3677 a standard shell costs around 30 to 300 credits. now compare that to a gold round which costs ONE THOUSAND TO FOUR THOUSAND. the average income per battle is around 3-6k credits maybe 10k if you perform well. you will lose tons of credits spamming gold its by design thats why they nerfed HE
The problem in MM is not only that most of the time you need to play against higher tiers and OP tanks, but also the skills of the players is too different. When I lose battles with 2-15 or even 0-15 the most players on my team have not more then 3 K battles and I have 20K battles and run the lowest tier in battle, while within the enemy team the lowest person has 30K battles. So not only there is a big difference in tanks, but also a too big difference in skill in both teams.
This is what most people refuse to grasp. How is WG supposed to balance the game when nearly half the population playing it are barely functioning in the first place.
Xvm supports this claim, I use xvm and its just sad when I enter a battle and in the first second you can see the outcome of the battle, tomatoes on one side and plus 55% win rate on the other team...
SKILL BASED MM
That simple.
Both teams have equal number of good and bad players.
@@imma5761 From a Blitz player, be careful what you ask for. In our next update, WeeGee are walking back the SBMM they tried to introduce in the past update. The problem is that a 65% player's WR ends up being balanced with 45-49% players on their side, while the other team may not have any 60%ers, they do have a team made up of 55+%. They don't balance the team with equal number of good players, just the WR and maybe a few other factors (that they hinted at, but don't seem to make much of a difference) The end result of what they implemented here is EVERYONE drifting towards a 50% WR... which is just dumb. Intentionally punishing (nerfing) a good player is not fun. Team quality is not set by one good player. If WeeGee could figure out a way to balance it correctly with less of a WR influence and more of WN8 or WN7 influence from a recent sample of game performances, or something like that that takes actual game actions and performance into consideration, then it would work better. Just a word of caution... be careful what you ask for or you just might get it.
@kurtvannuffelen3277 Iam more concerned about personal score, like enemy team always has better tanks and at least 2 epic players while my team has 3 golden III at best
i still watch quickbaby videos,just for watch how world tanks is going. but everyting is going worse and worse. i will never come back ever again
yep it always gets worse, every patch the match maker gets worse for free to play players. the more people spend money the more they win, buying pay to win tanks also increased victory rate rather than skill. this company should not be earning a single cent with their dishonest and malicious practices
Hé talks always bad but infact the games are good.. only match making sucks
@@fathinking88 then the games arent good if the match making isint. kind of an important factor for pvp dont you think?
@@soldier22881 in honestly 80% is good
This guy really thinks tier VII has variety because they never get straight VII MM when in reality all they face is the deluge of VIIIs. Delusional. Grinding tech tree VI and VII is becoming a nightmare.
this so much this. thank you for making this comment. dont forget the uploader also defends artillery in this game, let that sink in
no to mention tier 7 is at such a huge disadvantage because of overpowered unfun equipment like cvs which makes the tier 7 and 8 gap that much further and more miserable to play. grinding the tech tree has become unbearable i have stopped playing this game entirely
Yessir
I see the same problem with tank modifications that are only available to the top players. That makes the gap between us average players and the top players even larger.
Onslaught is a game mod that I will not join in anymore as it is clear that I don't stand a chance in winning any of the prizes that would make my tanks even better.
I am averaging 58% win rate and 2.8k wn8 without playing with food and 100% gold spam, only tier 8+
I also pretty much use only regular equipment(except bond optics on manti) and only my crew is usually really good(because of boosters that are avaiable to you too).
So yeah, skill issue
a good player with standard equipment will beat an average player with top equipment 10/10 times, just get better
@imma5761 how much is that a skill issue as you put it. Abd how much is it also the shit MM giving you stacked teams? Don't try to play stupid and think it's solely a skill issue as you and other WG simps claim lol.
@@Boo-jk3ii if xou cant get minimum 2.5k wn8 and 53%+ wr you shouldnt be talking about balance of this game because you are that trash player that gets farmed.
Simple as that buddy
@@imma5761 lul spoken like a true idiot simp of WG I see. It's alright we all know that WoT is the only thing you have going for you where you are "good" at something.
Yeah I "clearly" have a skill issue in a game with shit MM, crap maps, op pay to win tanks, gold ammo. But yet in games of true skill. I'm a well above average player. Hmmm strange how that is.
I agree with most points of this video. Though I think +-0 is good. It is a level playing field. OP t9 prem. tanks is a different issue by itself, not +-0 in general. But +-2 needs to go IMO.
I agree. +2 matchmaking is far more of a problem than arty damage.
@@kevinwillis331 See that's where they get ya. You start looking for the biggest 'problem' in the game and start weighing thinking "Hey this thing is the biggest issue"
The players then complain and 7 years later it gets addresed and nerfed...a bit. By that time, new issues get introduced.
It's not a matter of "this" or "that" - it's "this" and "that".
Since you mentioned it, I think arty has no place in this game at all.
@@milos-7712 Why are people so mad at arta? I played maybe 200games in arta for missions a while ago and I know how to evade them by angles of cover and reload time.
It's not some godly creature that can reach you anywhere - it's more of half brain boring clickers.
@@test_nametest_surname1794 I don't have the will or the time to get into this age old debate. It is an unfair, unskilled class that wrecks the fun of all players involved.
how far do you want to take the level playing field? What about everyone gets identical tanks?
Though I do appreciate your POV of a very skilled "sweaty Nerd" (as it were), please don't forget those of us who are mediocre or slightly better than average (high pings maybe?). We would love to get better but are still hampered by the atrocious MM that constantly pits us against 2 tier higher tanks. I believe this mismatch in WoT is there to allow the better players to pad their stats by clubbing us seals. Being a seal so much of the time, I neither find this enjoyable nor play much when the scenario repeats multiple times. One tier up or down as the norm; same tier as "Preferential". Then, I believe you would see far more time being invested in play and more enjoyable because the tanks being played would not feel like a knife being brought to a bazooka fight.
more people would play this game if it wasnt so blatantly pay to win. overpowered pay to win premiums, pay to win match making where paying players will win more games than free to play. rigged match making where devs have put unmarked bots to make free to plays lose. and lets not forget they still havent removed the most unfun class that ruins the game aka artillery
QB is literally describing T9 as peak and T6 as bottom. Guess what matchmaking they get. If you payed more attention, you'd see that you have common ground:
+/-0 mm gets repetitive
+/-1 mm gives variety without too tough challenges
constant +2 matches is a ball ache
I'd say make +/-1 the standard but give the players the choice to expand it but such that it match spread goes just as far both ways. (as in, if they want -2, they have to have the chance for +2 as well) either a tickbox for +/-2 or even a slider for more extreme cases, like OG LTs at T5 could go up to T10. The importance is that the choice is to the player so they can customize their experience.
yep well said magnus
the game is p2w though including the mm
those who pay more win more matches those who dont like me who are f2p get placed with low winrates the mm is not random
I don't even play my BZ-176 because of the slow reload. It's nice to get missions done but I LOVE to play my ADVENT Assassin tier 7 tank the most
I got a fadins medal with char mle thats pretty amazing
No matter what OP premium tier 9 or tier 8 they make I am not buying them. And I will stick with tier 9 as my main tier to play and tier 8 premium for credits and tier 10 only for events. until the game dies the way of all MMOs eventually will do.
if you dont pay money then the game will be rigged against you, they modified the match maker to be pure pay to win now. paying players will have high winrate and win often while free to play players will be forced into canon fodder teams and their winrate will be low as a result. the game is full pay to win casino gambling
The major problem with the MM is bad teammates who finish the game with zero damage, and cause the 15-0 fail games.
The few OP tanks are a secondary problem.
I agree, people want to blame others/tanks rather than themselves!
thats because the devs have added unmarked bots into the rigged match making. free to play players or those that don't pay enough money will lose more games thanks to the rigged match making. the game is full on pay to win, every under handed tactic the devs can think of are using it. i haven't payed a single cent, almost every match i have i have on average 4-5 teammates that do 0 damage, very rarely will I see the enemy team have the same amount of tanks do 0 damage. the game is pure pay to win rigged casino machine
MM can't fix stupid. Even if it was skill based you would still end up with blowouts.
@@Bigbacon they would be much more rare than compared to current mm that purposfully puts low skilled with free to play players up against pay to win players and overpowered premium tanks
the mm is designed to put free to play players with low skill people up against op pay to win tanks and paying customers. very one sided match making
I've really been struggling with all the autoloaders, it used to be that all the autoloaders had a very similar look and it was easy to keep them in mind but with so many tanks like this one that just look like normal tanks it gets really hard to tell the difference for casual players.
The most amazing part of that first game, is that the team actually assisted when someone called for help. I usually call for help and my team is spanking it in the corner ignoring me.
8:07 Whaaat? Ever since the marking meta has started I see the GOOD players ignoring one shot kills and preferring to shoot at what has enough hit points to survive a shot, because that gives more MoE. I think even YOU do that on streams!
Of course that's mostly in non-clutch situations. Still, it's bizarre for an old timer who plays for the win, not the MoE.
no good players who are trying to win games will always kill low health tanks. Damage doesn't win games kills win games.
@@christopherscarlett7301 if it's likely to be your last shot regardless, like the BZ here, then someone going for MOEs will absolutely prefer damage over a kill. You're replying to a specific example with a generality.
When wn7 was the latest thing i remember ppl waiting to shoot last to take the kill... a gaming community will always have those nerds plus all streamers play for moe... if anything xvm should be banned it's an excuse for quitting the battle, same with lots of noobs in -2 mm they just yolo suicide, +/-1 would be much better at this point.
Also when campaign missions started , you could see all kinds or weird anti-team oriented gameplay. At this point they should change xp reward being relative to winning and just count each player's performance.
all true, and what about the new player's that grind up to tier 4 and 5 where they see overpowered 6's and 7's with field mod's and much better equipment? and the fact of horrible mm where from tier 6 to 8 you are 70% likely to be down 1 or 2 tier's in every game you play?
and lets not forget all the overpowered premiums at each tier to make the grind that much worse. the overpowered derp guns that ruin lower tiers and higher tiers. artillery being overpowered camper class that turns every game into a campfest because any push or play will immediately result in trip back to the garage. such a pay to win game. also the match maker is rigged
@@soldier22881 all true!
@@soldier22881 this game back when was pure fun...but now.
@@jamesavery3559 now it is dookie
Hmm, I should play this tank so I can lower the WR for everyone else
Would you be able to talk about how you would buff and nerf different outlying tanks at 8,9,and 10?
I remember when the ELC Even 90 first came out and most streamers were like: "It's a meh... don't expect much."
But now: "It's OP!"
As guys mentioned before; just make the bz176 a tier 9 premium heavy. So you dont nerf the vehicle but you can fix the over powered status. Now tier 6 heavies (in a lot of t6-7-8 matchmaking each team has two tier 6 heavies) has no change to do damage to this over powered fortress.
you still dont get it do you? they will NEVER nerf premiums because people still keep giving them money no matter how many op premiums they release. if you want them to nerf premiums dont give them money, and especially dont play the game since they made their match maker pay to win rigged casino gambling.
I think it would be fun make a game mode with one way overpowered tank vs many other regular tanks. Rage mode, lol. Go op in a tank, or band together and try to shred it apart. Idk. . .
Also in blitz you are able to sell collector tier 10s for 7500 gold at present. In the mid April update selling a tier 10 collector will still be 7500 gold BUT to buy it back will cost 15000 gold.
Well, they figure we're gonna buy the next overpowered premium to battle the the current overpowered vehicle, and they cycle continues..
Is this not the game you fell in love with?
Ayo it’s that butt bot on the tank museum video
Few months ago everyone called this tank the stinker of the lootboxes.
I always thought it was the stand out underdog. The XM66F was the stinker
autoreloader with that armour a stinker? you crazy
This "fear" has been in works for a while, has already been predicred for quite some time by many including myself
After 10 years. I have closed the tank garage.
deleted your account?
Hey QB! I love this video and your video talking about Tiers 7 and 9! For months I've been talking to my clan and roommate about how tier 7 and 9 are the most comfortable and fun to play for me personally and your video summed up exactly why I feel that way. I got my roommate into the game and basically told him he just had to make it to tier 7 and the game would get substantially better. And it did, but the progression for him through tier 8 has nearly killed his motivation to play the game. Games at tier 8 are frustrating, I don't get nearly as frustrated with my games at tier 7 and 9 than I do at tier 8. And like you said I hope they don't do the same to tier 9 premiums that they did to tier 8. Due to the nature of tier 9 essentially having preferential matchmaking because they can only be tiered +1 in the mm, being able to skip to and get a tier 9 premium should be what's appealing, power level should be consistent and it could be a chance for them to try something unique with them instead of just releasing power crept hull down auto loading monsters like has been the case for a while. Great videos as always, cheers!
Hey QB can you make a updated review on all of the campaign vehicles?
Wargaming needs to buff all older tanks so they can penetrate better for their tier.
that will never happen, they will not buff free to play players, only nerf them. why do you think they have been releasing constant overpowered tier 8 premiums? the game is pure pay to win
@@soldier22881 I have a lot of older premium tanks that really suck for thier tier like, FCM 50 t. The penetration for this heavy sucks compared to all the newer premium heavies!
@@soldier22881 If they don't plan to update that tank, they should give me my gold back!
its an absolute monster in the hands of a knowledgeable player, but in the hands of an average player not so much.
I’m pretty sure they have something in the Eula that says they have the rights to alter and remove tanks. I think it’s just cowardice and a too powerful business team. Heavy tanks have too much view range, getting better and better camo and getting even faster, newer mediums are then getting pushed into where lights used to be and now with the tiny range of open maps, lights are becoming more and more of an inconvenience
nope its pure greed. people keep giving them money for pay to win tanks why would they ever nerf them? until people close their wallets they will never remove artillery or nerf premium tanks
This tank was the true gem for me. I mean the tiger maus was good too but this tank absolutely is the star.
Wg next Christmas
Introducing all new bz-177 900 alpha at tier 9
I don’t know why but any tank that is OP I can’t make work and they have some of my worst stats but the under powered tanks are some of my best win rates.
Feel the same =) Two of my favourite tanks are Tiger I and Easy 8 that are bad tanks for they're tier. But I can do good games with that
you're probably expecting too much from them. Try and play them a little more cautiously and you will do better (I don't mean camp in the back with a bz176, just play second line and and make sure your awareness is good)
Biggest fear is being left with whales and bots, no new players and a totally ruined MM.
WG needs to add tier 9 clan wars/skirmish + they should bring back historical battles as it was interesting
It is so sad that the original game play of world war tanks as it was several years ago has lost it's original and realistic form of battle. It's not a matter of how well you went to battle, but how much you can spend on so many options to "make" yourself better than you really are. Where's the skill in that.
Wish I had this or that one autoloading TD thats tier9. I don't buy lootboxes often and whenever I do its only 20-40 total.
i dont buy a single thing, its a pay to win game with pay to win tanks and pay to win match making. devs dont deserve a single cent
I brought 4 lootboxes and got it in the second one
I stopped playing when wheeled vehicles were released
i stopped playing because of artillery. im glad wheelies where released to make the artillery players mad
WG get to win either way. They can keep introducing OP premium tanks, but then indirecctly nerf them by buffing the tech tree tanks, then introduce a new OP tank a few years later that everyone now needs because the old OP tank is just meh. Like the scorpion G.
I will always enjoy playing the Tortoise. It's my favorite tier 9.5. :P
My biggest issue is literally how cancerous non-premium T8 is. Like when I play my lights and I'm up against Even 90s. Or any other tank vs TS-5, T56, BZ-176 etc. It's just so painful.
Non prem anything. No reason to play tech tree most of the time anymore ever since the Skopr G dropped.
Stopped playing after last christmas. Have played over 10 years but felling WOT is falling apart. Too many new tanks, Premium etc. Missing the time but now when i tried to start i Quick after one game. The feeling is gone. 😢
My biggest problem is that WG is adamant to bring scummy lootboxes in time and time again.
I really wanted the T 54D, but as they gave out like 10 vehicles the chances of getting it are tiny.
Would've happily paid a sum of money for it but not drain myself for hundreds of euros to have a *chance* of getting it.
If the meta has surpassed just giving out content for money as a straight trade and instead is focused on gambling mechanics, I'm out.
Heck, I feel like WG is kind of finding all the scummy ways to give out tier 9 premiums without actually selling them. iirc the Strv K and WZ-114 were like a mission marathon, tanks like the Concept 1B and Kpz 50 t are Ranked rewards and the rest are only given out in lootboxes.
because people don't realise WG is a casino with all the lootboxes and RNG in game. They get hooked on the anxiety of outcome before they can recognise it is not a game about tanks but luck and gambling.
I agree with you. One time premium tanks, doesn't matter the tier, were tanks just a little bit worst as regular tanks, but make extra credit and extra exp for crew. Now they're the only tanks to play, and it's becoming a sort of pay to win game. But I notice that op premium are only at tier 8
Easy fix: create a tier 11 line up and realign all the other tiers. If that doesn't work, create tier 12 and so on until the tiers are watered-down enough that game play is more equal
The vehicle played on this replay, the tier 9 premium, is way better than the concept. I have both the concept and the Kpz, but I would take the 3 shots burst damage anytime!
this was an interesting watch. I havnt played WoT since I quit not long after the race cars came out, that was the last straw for me after tier 3 £100 pay2win premiums, OP tier 5 arty, E25 madness, defender invasions, lootbox premiums, OP reward tanks, invincible autoloaders, err.. I'll stop there or I'll hit the character limit.
Glad im no longer invested in the downward spiral of WoT (I am actually somewhat surprised anyone still is), at least I have the happy memories of kicking ass in my KV-5 and when I first bought the Maus!
I just started playing 2 months ago. I know this game is 10 plus years old. So I believe if a new player comes on to wot they should. Be giving one premium tank per tier so they can get into it while tiering tank lines
that kv4 was a bit angry
QB my guy it's time you start blessing us with 1440p video quality...
You can always buff another tier and ruin the next one in a huge circle.
No tier is "safe", unfortunately. All of them are spoiled by various strong premium tanks that are a bit too popular!
Go from tier 2 and up and you will find premium tanks that cause havok and are straight unfair from the rest of them!
Regardless of the number of premium tanks I have in my garage, I support the decision about nerfing them, even if not directly but moving some up a tier, some down a tier, some to have some features touched a bit and so on.
I want the credit making ratio to go back up, even with premium now it's very low, they used to always have higher bonuses as well like x6, x 5, x3, now it's mainly x2, and the x200 crew bonuses for an hour really don't do much either now, it sucks. But yeah most of what is said in this video is true. Also, the grind to get the tanks up to normal gameplay/upgraded is really a pain now, some people given up on completing the tech tree's as a result. It just takes so long and you want a variety of tanks from various tech tree's not just the one because they really play differently.
Keeping the discussion about tier 9 power creep aside, I think the 752 is balanced because of the atrocious dpm. If you are already winning it snowballs a flank really well, but if it needs to shoot its way out of a sticky situation it falters.
Whales as investors was perrrfect 😂
Tier 6 thru 10 is fun. Even 8's. 8's my favorite
For me the game is dead for years. Once there was more paper tanks in battle then real ones, I was out. Today you can barely see single real tank in a battle.
I love the bz176! 😂
Well if they don’t make them competitive or overpowered people will be like “this tank is boring” or “this tank is underpowered it’s not worth the money”
Wait.... how do you get whole evenings of +-0 matchmaking?
My biggest fear is that the weasel tow will never be nerfed
Was a time when TigerII was a good tank. In tier10 everyone spamming gold....
Peak matchmaking for me was tier 7 only at 2014 with like 12 heavy tanks per team. Then I could show all those pesky IS how good I was with the Tiger P.
Tier 7 was my favorite tier back in the day it all changed in 2016. T29, isu122s etc
@@joshuamurray6580 whats wrong about the isu? you barely see it and its weaker than the su-122-44 imo
@@foxygrandpa4873 No I meant my favorites tier 7s are the T29 and Isu. Now playing tier 7s isn't fun playing against tier 9s and every op tier 8 premium tanks. Started early beta stopped playing around late 16 early 17 when the OBJ 252/defender was added and the game went downhill, with a big emphasis on $ and not the quality and balance of gameplay
Excellent video.
In warships u can pay 4000 gold and ship will be premium. Maybe same in tanks can change randoms , many normal tanks have good power but are jus not premium.
Where is the obj 752 come from? Some loot crates?
Christmas boxes
They will just make tier 10 premium tanks…
Coming from a console WOT player, it’s gonna happen. They release super strong tiers Xs for everyone to buy that hurt matchmaking. Taran, Centurion AVRE, etc…
+2/-2 gives good variety. Too many people cry though. The pre-2017 MM was the best, and no, that isn't nostalgia. I got receipts
Of all my relatively numerous (about 30% of all VIII tiers + obj 752), this one is amongst my favorite. I like it MUCH more than obj 703 or Defender. However, despite throwing a non negligible amount of money at WG, I am not paying for prem account, and I only play gold tanks to earn credits, so I tend to load golds only when I face enemy superheavy tanks like Maus or type 5.
90% of hits in that battle would have been fine even without gold shells.
I play this tank with normal AP and still enjoy it.
As an aside, I get a TON of same-tier matchmaking in Tier VII on NA servers, maybe this is just unique to the EU server. I'm all about +!/-1 tiering, but not +2/-2 tiering, perhaps that would satisfy us both?
you know, I don't have the slightest idea how the algorithm could have suggested your channel to me; that being said: i can’t stop watching your videos because my playstyle has actually improved by the hours spent watching you…Now a selfish question: Can you please play the Pz.KPFV IV Ausf.H ???
Do you have a video that can help reintroduce veterans to the game? Alot has changed and I haven't played since the swedish were introduced. Bonds, experimental stuff, the new UI layout. There is too much stuff to click on now in the garage 🤣
It’s kind of sad when you think about it. QB is telling us that War gaming’s monetization strategy is killing the game while at the same time showing us a footage where the ‘problem’ is doing great within the game. It’s like the ‘don’t think about elephants’ situation. Over powered premium bad- but -
it was an example how close to OP tier9 is doing and talking about the subject.
What else he supposed yo show?
Stretch tiers to 11, buff all regular tier 8, 9
100% it's going to happen to tier 9, it already has been. The 752 is very OP. Burst damage plus very good armour, even the weak spots, in practise are not easy to hit.
This is completely deliberate by WG, it isn't like they can't release balanced tanks, they actually do it fairly frequently. However the only reason they release any balanced tanks is to hide the few that are their monetisation targets because they think we are all too stupid to realise what they are doing.
My favourite tier 9 heavy.OP tank
I understand the concern but the person playing the tanks also gets a vote, and people don't like to play frustrating tanks. The problem is so many of the T9 premiums are terribly frustrating to play because they need at least 5 pieces of equipment with consumables and gold rounds to be decent OR they are just dmg/XP pinatas. Obj 590 (abysmal gun handling and depression), T54D (bad gun handling, depression, mobility), Tiger Maus (armor easily penned with gold and slow), WZ114 (DPM and aim time is glacial pace), T54 Heavy (terrible everything), and the list goes on. The ones that can be made to work with effort and great setups are the TL7, Chief Proto, Strv K, and Char 75, and they still aren't better than the reward or tech tree tanks. Obj 752 is the only one I would put in the "good" category, and WG forces you to spam gold in it because the standard rounds are bad.
I would rather play at T8 with premiums or just use a reward or tech tree tier 9 than use some of those garbage T9 "premiums". The extra 40K credits isn't worth it when you are spending more credits on repairs, consumables & premium rounds, have a lower win rate in those tanks because they are bad, and you end up not enjoying it due to the frustration.
If they continue that path, then they will need to rebalance the entire game in one go.
I dont think a lawsuit because "my bought premium now bad" would then be a concerning argument.
A good argument to rebalance everything would be if the ammunition type damage difference from the steel hunter game mode was added to the normal game.
That damage should get a profit of 500000 silver minimum. It is quite hard to reach that damage, and not many players can pull it.
Another point I have with Wargaming as a company model is that we buy stupid premium tanks that have huge premium shell costs, on a premium tank, so that basically nullifies your farming potential/role. There are many things this company does which are downright disgusting.
Tank balancing is bad. Team balancing is also bad. We have two or three arties per match, when one should be enough, not to mention being focused by two B C 155 58 arties is the best experience ever, constantly pelted with damage and stuns. Take out the stun mechanic and the damage capabilities and make arties a purely support role. Give them smoke screens to cover the allies when they are spotted and taking fire, but make it like a wall, through which nobody can see, your team included. Also give them flares so they can spot enemies in a sense.
EBR tanks should be nerfed to the ground, since that class does not necessarily reward only good players. You can drive across the map with your brain disconnected and still have a good time while the enemy cannot properly shoot you and punish you for that type of play. You can tell players to learn to aim better, but most tanks have bad shell velocity and horrendous aim times. I would love to create a minefield on the map for these players.
Elc Even 90, and some other tier X LT's like Manticore have a obvious advantage over other lights, and its not skill based either.
The free equipment from the Battle Pass did a lot of damage to the meta as well. Camo mechanics are a relic, they need a huge rework, I mean.. how the hell can a Maus go unspotted 50 meters away from you, on a open field???
Maps, oh my days... the maps are absolute dogshit gameplay wise, sure they might look aesthetically pleasing but too many maps are designed like we are playing tanks in League of Legends (corridor maps).
Map rotation is horrendous, I get matches where I play the same map with different spawn one after the other. I barely get Malinovka, Prokhorovka, the good maps.
The same bushes are known to everybody and everyone starts blind shooting lazily because thats what they saw good players do. Another thing which doesn't require skill, while the skilled player that tries to spot gets punished without being spotted. Its all because the bushes are SO obvious after so many years and patches. They should change the bushes from time to time so players actually learn the maps instead of just blind firing lazily in the same positions, with light tanks having no options where to go.
And they should slow down with so many pixel premium tanks, rebalance the old ones first so they become more viable. They started doing this, got to admit that. End the Hull Down meta already.
There will come a time when they will put in the game tier X premium tanks, like on the Asia server. And if.. and if they populate the server with a bunch of them, they will kill Tech Tree grinding.
i 100% agreee with you on this one QB, remember back in the day, way way back, almost for every single t8 prem tank which at that time were maybe T7.57/8(prem matches) they would release an awesome t7 probably a t7.5 tank or td as well. even t6 used to get love with actual viable to play prems, but as time has gone on, Wg has noticed that instead of selling 2 or 3 6s/7s they can sell 1 8 and make that same amount they shifted their focus. i really wish they would give some of the lower tiers some love, or make them make more credits, or something, there has to be a way that they can fix it. i understand why they cant nerf prem tanks, but what they can move them up. the 176 at t9, hey give it one more boost, and maybe 10mm more armor and boom, perfect for that, and that would be a "buff" to the tank but putting it where it cant 3/4 a tank on a pen.
Blitz used a +1 -1 Matchmaking, its much better imo, also far easier for WG to balance, armour still works on a lot of tanks against +1 MM.
True about what you say on the path Tier9 should no go, the path that went on in Tier9. The benefit of Tier9 compared to Tier7 ist you only have +1MM while Tier7 sees "a reasonable share" on +2MM. No one cares on having -2MM aka being 2 Tier Toptier.
On the named tanks for Tier8, true BZ176 was not overed in shop since the first release in boxes. Does this show care for MM on WG side? I am not that sure on it. ELCEven90 is avaliable mor times and Bourasque is offered often and has now a twin brother named Miel. Other Tier8 like Skoda56 and Progetto too were in shop often in the last 2 years. For al this tanks, there are lots of them out in the players hands and for BZ176, it is also not rare as about 180K players player them at least once. So WG might tink some more wont hurt as there are already so many available and the tank is played often (even the number of battles dropped since the first months after release). BZ's are dominating not only Tier8 randoms unless Tier10 is involved but more dominate Tier8 skirmishes as this are single tier battles. When WG will not nerf this tanks, other rules in MM can be applied like limiting as done with french lights or artys, limits in platoons, even spread on teams and number per team. But WG does care for MM and the game .. we only see not how and what they care for!
this also happens at lower tiers. It seems the really good players use over powered tanks then platoon with them. yhe problem is magnified when you are bottom tier. like tier 6 in tier 8 battle. this makes for skill based match making bias. I have told WOT about this. I will cut back my play until this gets fixed. I have over 56k battles.
Why did WOT stop a tier 10 ? You would think that there would be a 11,12 & more and spread the non ww2 and hypothetical tank in those.
3:00 its not your opinion, its a fact...
My biggest fear are premium vehicles and their impact on the game. That their are more powerful that the tech tree vehicles, I do not like that. I have lost that grinding will and lately in matchmaker I see more and more to me "unknown" vehicles. That is bad for the game.