Smashing! I thought I had heard the pinnacle of interpretations of this sonata with Gilels’ 1970 recordings. But a thorough listening to this one makes me wonder and believe that there’s a lot more under the sun than we had taken for granted. To sum up, they are both undeniable giants, magnificent in their (very) different interpretations and it would be onerous to discuss this or that point. Both of them and If I forced to take the the liberty (pace Gilels) of praising a movement, I would go for Richter’s “Presto”. Don’t ask me to explain why. At this level any comparison is - as I’ve mentioned - onerous. But, let us say, it appeals to me …
Everything with Richter is natural: there is no “interpreting“ (such as Barenboim to ingratiate his audience - have no idea where, must have been in Argentina where he is idolized). Together with Gilels you have the the most meaningful and honest interpretations of this sonata - anywhere - (both live and recordings).
Vorsicht, Hochspannung! Auch diese frühe Beethoven-Sonate sofort als von Richter gespielt erkennba! Und sein heißer Draht strömt ohne Loch und Ausfall bis zum Schluss, ohne dass dabei die urgründigen Lyrismen verglühen würden.
I am an absolute lover of everything Richter plays. But I also am a Gilels enthusiast. Frankly, although Richter plays the last movement in a magnificent way (extraordinary!!!) . I can’t help find the overall interpretation by Gilels is superior. Maybe it was the interpretation of the first two movements that put me “off”. But, if taken as a whole, my dear Richter needs to bow to Gilels.
@@affonsosantos5729 Hello again! It is very interesting, that I would prefer Gilels in the Presto of the third movement: it is a perfect virtuosity. - But "at the whole" I like Richter more, because of his steady playing "straight ahead". That means (in the words of the German music-author Joachim Kaiser) that at every time (in every note and phrase) you can hear "the past, the present und the end of the whole sonata."
They are both supreme giants, so there will always remain a fine line, regarding preferences. Your remark will lead me to listen to both interpretations, once again, for which I thank you.
I adore Richter and Beethoven and had never heard this piece before. But I have to say I find the Presto movement really annoying. Sounds like a young piano student banging on the keyboard.
Richter is one of my three top pianists of all time. That being said, I am a complete fan of whatever he plays but, here, I feel he misses the prevalent mood of humour in the first movement. As in the triple concerto and in so many other compositions, here Beethoven let’s loose his tongue-in-cheek humour which I miss in this interpretation of the first movement. It is brilliantly played, of course, but too serious in my opinion.
I. Allegro 0:01
II. Allegretto 8:24
III. Presto 12:41
Smashing! I thought I had heard the pinnacle of interpretations of this sonata with Gilels’ 1970 recordings. But a thorough listening to this one makes me wonder and believe that there’s a lot more under the sun than we had taken for granted. To sum up, they are both undeniable giants, magnificent in their (very) different interpretations and it would be onerous to discuss this or that point. Both of them and If I forced to take the the liberty (pace Gilels) of praising a movement, I would go for Richter’s “Presto”. Don’t ask me to explain why. At this level any comparison is - as I’ve mentioned - onerous. But, let us say, it appeals to me …
Outstanding.What a remarkable dynamics, overwhelming indeed! - Musician!!!
Ludwig van Beethoven:6.F-dúr Zongoraszonáta
1.Allegro 00:00
2.Allegretto 08:24
3.Presto 12:41
Szvjatoszlav Richter-zongora
Dès les premières notes, Richter est incomparable à mes oreilles. Quel génie...
Nobody else can set a mood like Richter can
Великий пианист, незабываемый
Spannende live Aufführung dieser fein komponierten Sonate im rhythmischen Tempo mit klarem Schlag und perfekter Dynamik. Noch unübertrefflich!
Большое спасибо!
Nach zwei Jahren wieder gehört und von Beginn an der Eindruck: Keiner war so in(!) der Sonate und in(!) der Musik wie dieser Pianist...!
One more point: nobody holds a candle to Richter’s technical prowess in the “Presto”.
Прекрасно 👏👏👏👏👏
3:00 это что то прекрасное…
Richter is the greatest of all when it comes to Beethoven
Quel géant...
Everything with Richter is natural: there is no “interpreting“ (such as Barenboim to ingratiate his audience - have no idea where, must have been in Argentina where he is idolized).
Together with Gilels you have the the most meaningful and honest interpretations of this sonata - anywhere - (both live and recordings).
Wow how dedicated Richter was!! He even played the piano, when it was raining!
Merci pour le partage
wonderful!!
偉大で巨大な建築物のようです。
Vorsicht, Hochspannung! Auch diese frühe Beethoven-Sonate sofort als von Richter gespielt erkennba! Und sein heißer Draht strömt ohne Loch und Ausfall bis zum Schluss, ohne dass dabei die urgründigen Lyrismen verglühen würden.
I am an absolute lover of everything Richter plays. But I also am a Gilels enthusiast. Frankly, although Richter plays the last movement in a magnificent way (extraordinary!!!) . I can’t help find the overall interpretation by Gilels is superior. Maybe it was the interpretation of the first two movements that put me “off”. But, if taken as a whole, my dear Richter needs to bow to Gilels.
@@affonsosantos5729 Hello again! It is very interesting, that I would prefer Gilels in the Presto of the third movement: it is a perfect virtuosity. - But "at the whole" I like Richter more, because of his steady playing "straight ahead". That means (in the words of the German music-author Joachim Kaiser) that at every time (in every note and phrase) you can hear "the past, the present und the end of the whole sonata."
They are both supreme giants, so there will always remain a fine line, regarding preferences. Your remark will lead me to listen to both interpretations, once again, for which I thank you.
I adore Richter and Beethoven and had never heard this piece before. But I have to say I find the Presto movement really annoying. Sounds like a young piano student banging on the keyboard.
I love both Beethoven and Richter, but I agree with you entirely. The Presto is really irritating.
I am being censured with my postings.
15:25 o.O woah a mistake.
Hopefully when I make a mistake in my exam, I can pass it off as interpretation.
ButterScotch When you can play as well as Richter there will be no need to take any examinations...!😊😂
Thank you, Herr Beckmesser.
ButterScotch I didn’t hear any mistake
15:28
"To play a wrong note is insignificant; to play without passion is inexcusable"
Richter is one of my three top pianists of all time. That being said, I am a complete fan of whatever he plays but, here, I feel he misses the prevalent mood of humour in the first movement. As in the triple concerto and in so many other compositions, here Beethoven let’s loose his tongue-in-cheek humour which I miss in this interpretation of the first movement. It is brilliantly played, of course, but too serious in my opinion.
Horrible. Nelson Freire plays better
Tell me please, what should be "better" (in your judgement). Then you´ll get a "horrible"answer from me...