So glad to hear your conclusions... I've demoed this RipX stuff twice and beyond the "stems", I don't find the other features up to snuff (and the GUI is horrific!)
Love using DeepAudio for stem separation, exporting to MIDI and transposing instruments/vocals. Totally worth it. I’m not sure deepcreate is doing anything I couldn’t do myself by exporting the rips into my DAW but thanks for the video!
There is another AI separation software called DeMix, which can actually separate lead and backing vocals from each other. I don’t know of another similar software that can do this. The production aspect of RipX looks interesting. Thank you for doing this video.
I've tried Steinberg SpectraLayers Pro (which I own), iZotope RX (of which I own an older basic license) and several AI websites that split out stems and RipX blows them all out of the water for stem separation quality. Outside of the obvious bootleg remixes uses, I see this type of software as a way of being able to go back into a track that's mixed down where a player or singer was a bit out of key, or their timing was off and be able to fix it, then recompose those tracks back down together to have a more perfect mix.
@@ManchesterMusic Haha 😂. I can't either. It's actually underrated over the other separation softwares but it's been around for a while too. Was really surprised when I found out.
When background vocals and/or choirs are involved, separation is much more complex since they are all considered ‘vocals’. As of now, I haven’t found any AI that accomplishes such separation tasks without corrupting/losing other artifacts of the song. Then there’s Mid/Side efforts. Perhaps softwares like Demix will improve in that issue. HOWEVER…Geoff did a great job as always for the purpose of this video. 👍🏻
my thoughts as an audio engineer. the tech is cool. its a lot of fun to dive in and play, remix vocals in different keys or restructure songs.. but thats the keyword, its for fun. Thats fine as long as people understand this. the very nature of whats going on under the hood is insanely destructive to the fidelity of the audio and theres no way around it. were dealing with things like harmonics its impossible to get a clean separation. In a professional application this is a bad idea, unless youre ripping melodies to output midi to use with virtual instruments. The tech just isnt there yet but this is a lot of fun for sure.
Is this thing able to separate multiple tracks of guitar, say, 2 or 3 guitar tracks, individually, or will it just create one separate track from all the guitars?
Believe me, I'm also confused. I think they're all the same interface, but the modules and functionality will be slightly different in each. I think the thing that's consistent though is that you've got source separation tech in each.
@@ManchesterMusic I even wonder if there are keyboard shortcuts for those who are without sight, like me, for instance. If so, I'd like to try it one day! Even better is if it's accessible to screenreaders like JAWS (Job Access With Speech).
Too many digital artifacts are created when using RipX. Can ruin a stem. Not to mention if your buying this to swap out instruments in the sample with your own VST it sounds horrible and over processed. Not there yet at al
So glad to hear your conclusions... I've demoed this RipX stuff twice and beyond the "stems", I don't find the other features up to snuff (and the GUI is horrific!)
Love using DeepAudio for stem separation, exporting to MIDI and transposing instruments/vocals. Totally worth it. I’m not sure deepcreate is doing anything I couldn’t do myself by exporting the rips into my DAW but thanks for the video!
It’s magic just magic. Next gen sampling here. About to get crazy.
There is another AI separation software called DeMix, which can actually separate lead and backing vocals from each other. I don’t know of another similar software that can do this. The production aspect of RipX looks interesting. Thank you for doing this video.
At 3:45, the cloudier yellow blobs you see are probably the backing vocals.
@@oliverquach9614 - I would have to heat it in action and assess the results. DeMix does it with an algorithm and no need to tweak anything.
I've tried Steinberg SpectraLayers Pro (which I own), iZotope RX (of which I own an older basic license) and several AI websites that split out stems and RipX blows them all out of the water for stem separation quality. Outside of the obvious bootleg remixes uses, I see this type of software as a way of being able to go back into a track that's mixed down where a player or singer was a bit out of key, or their timing was off and be able to fix it, then recompose those tracks back down together to have a more perfect mix.
Spectralayers is better for harmonic editing. Ripx harmonic editor is useless.
Tried Rip X weeks ago and was amazed with the results. I think it'd be a better alternative for Moises and has more features as compared to Moises
It’s pretty impressive overall. I still can’t get over the source separation…we’ve come so far.
@@ManchesterMusic Haha 😂. I can't either. It's actually underrated over the other separation softwares but it's been around for a while too. Was really surprised when I found out.
When background vocals and/or choirs are involved, separation is much more complex since they are all considered ‘vocals’. As of now, I haven’t found any AI that accomplishes such separation tasks without corrupting/losing other artifacts of the song. Then there’s Mid/Side efforts. Perhaps softwares like Demix will improve in that issue. HOWEVER…Geoff did a great job as always for the purpose of this video. 👍🏻
my thoughts as an audio engineer. the tech is cool. its a lot of fun to dive in and play, remix vocals in different keys or restructure songs.. but thats the keyword, its for fun. Thats fine as long as people understand this. the very nature of whats going on under the hood is insanely destructive to the fidelity of the audio and theres no way around it. were dealing with things like harmonics its impossible to get a clean separation. In a professional application this is a bad idea, unless youre ripping melodies to output midi to use with virtual instruments. The tech just isnt there yet but this is a lot of fun for sure.
This is great. But I could still hear that digital crushing sounds. Robotic sound.
Is this thing able to separate multiple tracks of guitar, say, 2 or 3 guitar tracks, individually, or will it just create one separate track from all the guitars?
Is RipX also the right platform for creating a new song like Logic/Garageband?
FRIEND HOW TO INSTALL THE RIPX DAW PRO PROGRAM
By can we get midi out of it?
I am wondering how this tool would/might be useful for Post-Production Sound projects--in particular Dialogue and Music Editorial work...?
Which software is the best for piano parts separation? (without mixing together with other instrument)
Thanks. Is this 3 different APPs in 1? I'm not sure I understand why there are Rip, Create, Remix etc. Its not clear on website either.
Believe me, I'm also confused. I think they're all the same interface, but the modules and functionality will be slightly different in each. I think the thing that's consistent though is that you've got source separation tech in each.
@@ManchesterMusic I even wonder if there are keyboard shortcuts for those who are without sight, like me, for instance. If so, I'd like to try it one day! Even better is if it's accessible to screenreaders like JAWS (Job Access With Speech).
So this thing is a little like RX's Music Rebalance on outer space steroids?
Yeah like incredible source separation + a daw.
Too many digital artifacts are created when using RipX. Can ruin a stem. Not to mention if your buying this to swap out instruments in the sample with your own VST it sounds horrible and over processed. Not there yet at al
This works great for an easy song to separate. I would like to see this do a complicated track.
Download a free trial and see if it works for you.
Sounds like 64kbps MP3s I ripped in 1997...
Why o why is this standalone only? Supposed to be a production tool and you can’t even sync with the daw?
I think they want to replace the DAW with this. One stop shop.
OK here and there as it can yield rather decent results but that artificial sound is something I wont be using.
For sample based productions it is interesting as you can add distortion to the drums to cover up the artifacting and of course EQ and filtering.
Why does it feel like I've just sat through a 30-minute sales presentation?
FRIEND HOW TO INSTALL THE RIPX DAW PRO PROGRAM