I had something similar in mind, but instead, you had the choice to double move. And when you want to double move, you skip your turn. And then on your next turn, you play two moves.
some interesting double moves pawns can kinda capture like knights rooks and queens can basically access the whole board in the endgame knights can move 1 square diagonally
It’d be fun to see this, but any piece can do a sort of en-passant If you do a double move with 1 piece, the opponent can take the piece by taking the first spot you moved to
That would be interesting but what do you do about captures , especially on the second move? It doesn't arise in normal en passant because the initial double step move can't capture. But if say the knight has captured the queen on the second move and you en passant it, does the queen get uncaptured because the second move never happened?
Broo i play it with my family and its dun but a thing is that you cant capture the kings because it makes the games to short for me ❤,and white also starts with to moves,and their is checks and also you cant walk into check.
so pawns can move 3 squares in the first turn they can capture like knights sometimes and can move 2 squares diagonally if it can capture 2 pieces in the diagonal knights can move 1 square diagonally and also knights are kinda like knight riders here and are pretty tricky sence they are hard to calculate bishops basicly control all the light and dark squares rooks and queens are too op control the whole board kings are a square they can move up to 24 squares or like a 5x5 square and green lemon games is the stream cancceled today?
Did you know about the Thue-Morse Sequence? I think it would be more fair than this "offset double" approach in a game theory perspective, but that would be a hell to implement and calculate lol
Also it's not significant better and it's harder for players to understand and the whole point is to get double moves, But if you want to alternate between double moves and single moves it makes sense
@@ckq when I say calculate I mean it's more difficult for players to plan out future moves. But yeah the improved fairness won't be significant until very high level.
If you want to mitigate the advantage that having 2 moves in a row gives, what if you have premove your second move so like 1. e4 (premove 2. Nf3) 1. d5 (premove 2. Bg4) 3. exd5 (premove 4. Qxf3) 3. Qxd5 (this invalidates whites Qxf3 pre move and they lose a turn essentially) (premove 4. Bxf3) 5. Qxf3 (premove etc.
Can I give a suggestion? This double move chess basically kill the entire standrd chess game strategy, what about you do a Double move after every 10 moves or something like that? It might be interesting, you need to prepare your position for this double move event and is just stupidly hard to calculate. I assume white has a very big advantage but you could give it a try or think about extra rules like, it can't be the same piece, so you can't just yolo your queen acroos the board and "mate" in 2 moves, or a rule where you can't capture in this double move turn so the double moves are less tactical and more positional, or maybe you can only double move on your half of the board, idk. Downside: Pretty hard to make a fancy title and thumbnail to get more views with more complicated rules
I had something similar in mind, but instead, you had the choice to double move. And when you want to double move, you skip your turn. And then on your next turn, you play two moves.
This seems like chess but twice as fun
Twice as in 2 moves hehe
badumtss
Seems like chess but 2x more complicated
some interesting double moves
pawns can kinda capture like knights
rooks and queens can basically access the whole board in the endgame
knights can move 1 square diagonally
It’d be fun to see this, but any piece can do a sort of en-passant
If you do a double move with 1 piece, the opponent can take the piece by taking the first spot you moved to
That would be interesting but what do you do about captures , especially on the second move? It doesn't arise in normal en passant because the initial double step move can't capture. But if say the knight has captured the queen on the second move and you en passant it, does the queen get uncaptured because the second move never happened?
@@Tehom1 that’s a good idea, sort of undoing it
no the queen would not come back bc it was captured, you en passant the knight to capture back
holy hell
if you move a pawn twice can you do an en passant en passant
I remember a variant where white had 4 pawns and a king with 2 moves against a full black side with 1 move
Monster chess
9:02 he blunder a victory
Every game: 😮
My game: 💀
not even 4 moves in
4:03 it wasnt your turn to play that mate
Nah it was d3 d4 for some reason
They moved their pawn twice
really forces you to think two moves ahead, huh
Broo i play it with my family and its dun but a thing is that you cant capture the kings because it makes the games to short for me ❤,and white also starts with to moves,and their is checks and also you cant walk into check.
The whole point of chess is to capture the king, and walking into checks is already a rule since it is illegal to do so
theoretical mate in like 4
1. d4 e5
2. d5 P
3. d6 Bb4
4. P Bxe1#
what is P
@@erlendberge423 Empty move so they can move twice
It's not even two moves bruh
@@number1-willstetsonsimp I feel like playing d4 is just a stupid move for double move chess
so pawns can move 3 squares in the first turn they can capture like knights sometimes and can move 2 squares diagonally if it can capture 2 pieces in the diagonal knights can move 1 square diagonally and also knights are kinda like knight riders here and are pretty tricky sence they are hard to calculate bishops basicly control all the light and dark squares rooks and queens are too op control the whole board kings are a square they can move up to 24 squares or like a 5x5 square and green lemon games is the stream cancceled today?
we need to combine this wiith spell chess, that would be something for sure :D
white queen would jump over pawn and use second move to capture king
I like double move chess but if it's check on the first turn you don't have you're second move
Did you know about the Thue-Morse Sequence? I think it would be more fair than this "offset double" approach in a game theory perspective, but that would be a hell to implement and calculate lol
It's not hell to calculate, just write the number in binary and count if there's an odd or even number of 1s
Also it's not significant better and it's harder for players to understand and the whole point is to get double moves,
But if you want to alternate between double moves and single moves it makes sense
@@ckq when I say calculate I mean it's more difficult for players to plan out future moves. But yeah the improved fairness won't be significant until very high level.
I love Mind Control Chess more
Rooks and Bishops in double move chess can move like each other's single move
Like rooks can move diagonally and vice versa
Bishops can never leave their color
@@Benlego2017 oh, that's the bishop's only catch. Thanks for pointing it out!
nf3 would be so amazing here
We should have a tournament of this
Think it would be interesting if you had to mate the king and cant take it
Guys, we finally got chess 2
If you want to mitigate the advantage that having 2 moves in a row gives, what if you have premove your second move
so like
1. e4 (premove 2. Nf3)
1. d5 (premove 2. Bg4)
3. exd5 (premove 4. Qxf3)
3. Qxd5 (this invalidates whites Qxf3 pre move and they lose a turn essentially) (premove 4. Bxf3)
5. Qxf3 (premove
etc.
Basically it simulates the time pressure you'd have in a bullet game while keeping the game long enough to think
@@ckq i don't understand your idea, how do you premove a move if it's still your turn ??
I think they means you move 2 moves in a round, but the second one is premove?
How is it premove if its just your turn, it makes no sense
@@lucasmatsuoca you premove for the next turn that move will automatically move (unless illegal, then you lose a move?)
This seems like chess but four times as fun
twice as fun
@@only1executionerok
you missed so many easy to see checkmates in 3 and 4 with knight
Make 5+ player chess
I would challenge you to a game where can we play?
I wonder whether playing weird chess, like this, messes with one's normal game.
Definitely 😂 But I'm having a lot of fun with it
Good idea in concept but as soon as you can obtain check, it’s game over…
you can add a rule where you cant move the same piece twice in one turn
seems cool
You cheated in the sexond game.
White made one move in yhe second move
Chess is a turn based strategy game
6:54 why did white only move once?
Can I give a suggestion? This double move chess basically kill the entire standrd chess game strategy, what about you do a Double move after every 10 moves or something like that?
It might be interesting, you need to prepare your position for this double move event and is just stupidly hard to calculate.
I assume white has a very big advantage but you could give it a try or think about extra rules like, it can't be the same piece, so you can't just yolo your queen acroos the board and "mate" in 2 moves, or a rule where you can't capture in this double move turn so the double moves are less tactical and more positional, or maybe you can only double move on your half of the board, idk.
Downside: Pretty hard to make a fancy title and thumbnail to get more views with more complicated rules
🤓
@@costa-w3kYou love making fun of people who actually care do you
5:29 a while back you could do knight e5, next turn is check mate if white doesn't move the king
The D or F pawn could capture that on white's next double move so it's not safe for the knight to end there.
Bro has degrees in yapping
Fr but i mean do u want no commentary?
mute the video if you think it would make the vid better
Hi
Sup
how do i play this?
You make two moves and after that your opponent makes also two moves and you keep going like that