Why Boeing Has So Many Problems?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 дек 2022
- The Boeing 737 Max production line is coming to an end. The issue with the narrow-body 737 Max aircraft is so severe that airlines worldwide may never fly them again. Despite their best efforts, Boeing appears to be losing the struggle to keep one of its most promising aircraft on the market, giving archrival Airbus a crucial share of the aviation market.
So, here’s why Boeing 737 Max is the World’s Unluckiest Plane.
The Boeing 737 Max aircraft is fourth in the line of the popular Boeing 737 airlines, the favored narrow-body plane adored by Boeing Commercial Airplanes’ top customers. The plane is an improvement over the Boeing 747 Next Gen series manufactured in the 1970s. Boeing built the 737 Max as a follow-up to Airbus’s A320neo series. The series was announced in late August 2011, and its first official flight occurred five years later. It passed the Federal Aviation Administration’s inspection and was cleared for commercial flight in the first quarter of 2017.
Want to watch more, please SUBSCRIBE for many more videos like these.
SUBSCRIBE: / @untoldaviation
New Videos EVERY WEEK
#boeing 
Авто/Мото
If they are going to get close to the Airbus 320 they will have to build a new plane, did you know that the internal dimensions of the A 320 are almost the same as the external dimensions of the B 737? In other words, the B737 would almost fit inside the A320 !
Let’s be honest, Boeing used their power in the business to certify itself that it was safe. And by all the rumours that came out since then about build quality and quality control Boeing should be forever known to cut corners in regards to safety over their greed to gain profits
A bit hypocritical, wanting honesty while you believe in rumours, eh?! FYI, the airplane was safe, even when flown by untrained pilots. When you put an untrained 8-year old at the steering wheel of a car, you don't declare the car to be unsafe when it crashes, do you?
Totally agree. The congressional investigation findings were unbelievable. The secretive implementation of MCAS was sketchy to say the least. But the decision to have MCAS reference only ONE angle of attack sensor was unbelievable. They knew the system was potentially dangerous and tried to cover it. CEO's need to start serving prison time for blatant disregard of safety just to make an extra buck.
Boeing should be ashamed of themselves!
It is not the fault of the 737MAX; it is the poor management of Boeing in its development.
Clearly not the fault of an aeroplane as that is merely an inanimate object. Blame Boeing.
True, I wouldn't call it "unlucky", as it's just an inanimate object, I also wouldn't call Boeing "unlucky", they wanted to implement a totally new concept of flight controls because the "small changes" in the 737 max series actually makes it impossible to fly them manually, they need a software which does very many actions per minute just to keep the plane in stable flight. This would have required extensive flight testing, but they didn't test enough to cut costs which led to the failure of the software that caused them all the troubles.
@@rfvtgbzhn
Impossible to fly manually?
@@alhanes5803 yes, it's impossible to fly it 100% manually. This is new to civil aviation but not new in the military, the B-2 bomber also can't be flown 100% manually (in this case because it's a flying wing, which is also unstable an requires a high rate of corrective inputs)
@@rfvtgbzhn
Apples and oranges
All you need to fly a 73
Is pitch control, and roll control.
All transport category aircraft must be able to do that to be certified, not only in the states but thru out the world.
That it what direct law is on Airbus.
i am kinda glad the 737 max is stopping i will never fly in boeing 737 max as a passenger after all the problems
Please check the statement "two sensors, it was a single sensor feed initially....
I think your conflating differento issues.
The crew alerting system issue is for newly certified aircraft in this case the MAX 7&10.
The 8&9 already in service won't be affected.
the entire management is horrible. The clean out required would be 1000's of personnel. Leaving that dump of a company is one of the finest moments of my life! Hated them!
Interesting, although some of the v/o content is shabby. 'Several families grieving' after hundreds of people died on Boeings is so weak.
IAG has decided to buy a load of Max aircraft. The second they begin flying for BA is the second this customer oots to fly with someone else.
Just gonna ask, are you the voice actor for Kent Honda?
Brilliant comment.
FYI, they're called "scimitar winglets." No worries. ✈️😉✌️
Is this plane worth the troubles it brings to Boeing
2:49 it wasn't unlikely. The software used to fly these planes had a flaw that inevitably would have led to crashes like that sooner or later. They should have done more flight testing, then they would have encountered the flaw during testing.
Or concede the fact that the pilots needed additional training besides their regular 737 certifications.
Oh it's much worse than that, they we're well aware of the flaw. There was a whole slew of internal communications talking about how MCAS had too much authority and that pilots really needed to know about it but because of the pressure they were receiving to not require additional training they buried it.
Regardless of what Boeing says EICAS does make planes more user friendly and allows pilots to quickly and accurately diagnose system malfunctions. If people had EICAS doctors would never misdiagnose any ailment. Think about that the next time you fly on a 737
This is out of date, the Max is flying again and Boeing has received new orders
Honestly, they should just ditch the 737 max series. All Boeing need to do is revamp the 757 series and bring it back into production! The 757 series with an economic and longer range would be a very good competitor for the Airbus A321 neo series! But it seems like Boeing are digging a hole for themselves…
The 737 MAX 10 is the a321 competitor, will enter into service in early 2024.
The 737 family has accumulated over 15000 orders compared to only 1000 by the 757.
Obviously you take ditch the one with less sales
@@mmm0404 Yes Boeing obviously did so and I can see why. But the max series is stretching the plane too much and is adding features beyond its realms of possibility. Most of these features were on 757 anyways, so why create the extra work and hassle?
@@mmm0404
MCAS was a brilliant idea to make the max fly like earlier models.
The only mistake they made was by the single source info.
This crap that they didn't tell the pilot's about it is a joke.
Modern jets have Hundreds of systems operating in the background pilot's don't know about, especially Airbus.
I have nothing against Airbus, they are great airplanes.
it's not unlucky. It's their own fault didnt mention MCAS
Really? What would the pilots have done differently if they knew that MCAS existed? Remember, the Ethiopian pilots knew MCAS existed 4 months before they crashed.
@@petep.2092 They would have gotten additional training and cost boeing huge money due to which crashes wouldn't have happened and boeing would feel very guilty about not killing people for profits.
Dare I say, pilots are the ONLY ones who enjoy this plane because the pax and cabin crews TRULY don't like 737s and especially the MAX. More uncomfortable seats and shrunken lavs when most ppl in the states at least, are not sample size, but I get it $$$$$$$ is all that counts.
Wow wow wow good brother TNX GOOD business ok good Family First good
Boeing is second best airplane after Airbus
Not unlucky. Boeing make it the flying coffins again and again.
There is no way the 380 is making any comeback outside of Emirates, c'mon.
Laughs in Etihad