The video was interesting and informative, but had little to do with the title of the video. You look at the name of a video and create expectations, deciding whether or not to watch it. So is naming things accurately too much to ask?
Kgcopper Yeah fuck D-news and this guy that commentated on it. I always fall for the title because it sounds interesting then when I watch it, they talk about something else that is not what the title suggested.
TwiztidMaGiC No I didn't. Did you miss the part where never got around to telling us exactly the difference between how Asians and Europeans evolved? Which is what the video's title would lead one to believe, it being called "Why Europeans and Asians Evolved So Differently".
Kgcopper where does native americans originate from? He's talking about people migrating from Africa to europe and asia and how they evolved differently, but that must have skipped your attention completely?
They didn't "Evolve" differently. They just "Look different" moderately on the surface. That has to do with "Who" exited Africa, from what tribe or shape and size, and then started a colony "Somewhere" else. It also has to do with Diet, and adaption to environment. If you go to the DNA "Ground 0" Tribe in Africa, and looked at them, you'd see all the "Races" which are actually tribes, of the world in their faces. Regardless of pigment of skin, which is not evolutionary, but an adaption.
+Gery A This is true, on another video he claims scientists recovered DNA from "The Red deer people", and claimed there was no matches with any other hominid, but I can't find any evidence.
Trace Dominguez just saying... what did the butter and roll evolve from. I'm just... really confused. but the butter can speak so a piece of butter with human DNA... seems logical to me.
I recently finished anthropology and in the textbook it said that milk started in the regions of northern Europe and Ethiopia something I guess these guys left out I didn't hear a mention of milk starting in Ethiopia and I don't even know how milk would be from the persian empire since again my class was more recent and they didn't say the mutation to process milk started in Iran so overall I agree with the comments it's a waste of time, I can't belive I used to watch this channel
@@elliotrook6063 Mediterraneans are more advanced. Big Civilizations were born around Mediterranean. Not in Europe. Europe is in the game last millennia thanks to Mediterraneans.
He explained skin tone. Body size is affected by climate and nutrition, climate can also affect the face (e.g. certain nose/nostril shapes work better in cold climates). There's also genetic 'drift' of isolated groups, and I suspect selective breeding due to each culture's perceptions of beauty.
maswell People think Mongoloids (what Americans call Asians) have epicanthic folds (squinty eyes) to prevent glare from snow, and that they have pedomorphic bodies (smaller limbs in relation to torso) in order to reduce surface area and conserve heat. Smaller facial features likewise reduce surface area and prevents frostbite
schokohase498 I can instantly tell Indians apart from others. That guy is definitely black. No way in fuck he's of Indian origin, unless he's an immigrant.
Bruce Wayne yeah, he looks like an afroamerican, maybe half caucasian. Just a thought, maybe the lighter skinned one in the thumbnail is the asian one and Trace just doesn't know what a european is?
Salman Qasim But it is we are primates and classified as such were not made of dirt and ribs we are better than that, there are no talking snakes or burning bushes as much as you dont like it it does not beat fact! Genetic data and evidence in the fossil record backs it up as well as physical evidence from apes sharing the same behavior and using tools! More evidence is the skeleton and skull of an ape looks almost like that of a humans! The Bonobo stands upright and shares human characteristics and also has sexual positions like humans do including performing fellatio! Human and ape organs are interchange able in donations as well and apes can interperate human sighn languages as a means of communication as well. I can go on but your tiny mind cannot comprehend nor have the capacity to open up and learn more of anything!
He said he had done research from many places. So I think he had taken notes, but couldn't just memorize it all and had to refer to his notes. Any of us would do the same.
+hoijarvi Lactose intolerance in Native Americans is closer to 74%. In the Igbo and yoruba, it's about 96 and 99% respectively, though this figure is not so much lactose intolerance as it is lactose malabsorption. This means people from these tribes can and do eat diary, but they cannot consume it in large quantities like Northern European's can. It is very different from being intolerant, which means you fall sick after consuming lactose. They don't. You can also think of it as partial intolerance. As a matter of fact, many milk products are now breakfast staples in southern Nigeria, which is where you find the Yoruba and Igbo groups
+hoijarvi As for Skin colour having something to do with eating cereals, I'm not sure there's any consensus about that. www.ted.com/talks/nina_jablonski_breaks_the_illusion_of_skin_color?language=en
+princenbl Thanks. On skin color: I've read it's UV and vitamin D. Grain contains little vitamin D, so thousands of years of high grain diet has made Egyptians much lighter than hunter-gatherers from central Africa; they need to get vitamin D from UV radiation. Eskimos and Lapps have darker skin than Scandinavians, because of diet high in animal protein and the thinner ozone layer close to poles. I'm surprised the speaker did not mention this.
This is the first time I clicked on this guy's channel and I sincerely can't understand why he has 400k subs. He doesn't do anything at all appart from reading from Wikipedia, which all of you can do. Ew. Another example of RUclips's selective and demanding crowd.
Tom Chhkuot Everything you say is ok. Maybe you prefer podcast, but RUclips is the biggest web on earth to watch... videos. Yeah, videos. So... your whole argument is invalid, and this guy still is terribly overrated.
i think its ways to earn money this kind of systematic ideas you can earn money everyone had choice to do they want or like, guessing that not everybody like to read on there own but podcast will do to at least increase there knowledge beyond others interest or field of studies.
Samui Style And that's why I don't have 400k subscribers. But I didn't expect them neither, because I don't work like many others do in their RUclips channels. This guy doesn't, he's just having a laugh at you, lazy people not even able to read from Wikipedia.
Treat others how you want to be treated you know evolution isn't about the origin of the first life, ift's about the adaptation of life to it's environment over time due to "survival of the fitest" and descent with inherited characteristics. This is something that is observable in the present world and for which there is a lot of experimental evidence.
Kyle Kimberley Exactly! It is interesting how our society has become obsessed with appearance/race, and that phenotype is all we think about with regards to evolution and different groups of people... I came to learn more about why Europeans have fostered addiction to power and colonialism more than others. LOL.
+Presidential Candidate Deez Nuts Many channels post links and cite their sources in their description box. Anybody can say "science has said" or "anthropologists have found," which is why I asked. He doesn't even mention a name or title of a peer reviewed journal here. This isn't the only channel doing it. Links to his Twitter account does not qualify as a citation, fool.
You have to hand it to this guy. He literally just reads off a wikipedia page and gets millions of views. Hardly even bothers to edit the videos. Get them coins!!! lol
I don't know if he got this off wikipedia but he got it from some source(s) which is fine. nobody knows everything, including your doctor. hence all the reference books in lawyer's offices, etc. If he had memorized the material, perhaps he could have looked at the camera more and it would appear that he just "knows" all this stuff. I'm a teacher and i think he did just fine. he spoke clearly, he referred to his notes and he communicated. even presidents have speeches on teleprompters or on paper, and that's just a speech. but, hey, haters gotta hate
He is being facetious, but we were fish and reptiles before we were.. "little squirrel things" according to Naked Science -- Mankind Rising - Where do Humans Come From
That's actually not such a crazy take. There is mounting evidence that proto humans did leave the African continent then return to it only to leave again tens of thousands of years later as homo erectus. Where they met other humans who never did return and at that point had already diverged themselves into several subspecies (neanderthal/denisovan)
@@suzukisixk7 Neanderthals and Denisovans aren't human, but apelike humanoids. They were a separate species altogether, grafted almost with the same amount of chromosomes as we true humans -- designed to corrupt the gene pool, like the Nephlim gene pool. Over time, they were able to fully mixed with true humans.
@@withastickangrywhiteman2822 voices don't have sexual orientations, and your reply has nothing to do with the comment jedi 620 made. Lactose is a sugar found in milk, which is what the original comment was referring to, where in the video the host refers to it as a protein.
I came here to learn why Asians have shorter eyes than Europeans. I did not get the answer I wanted, but I learnt that a lot of people still couldn't drink milk, so I'm satisfied.
Asians are still short lol, maybe not as much as before but it's the Americans fault for giving them tons of heart-diseases and cancer because of animal products, and them getting taller because of it makes it even worse for the heart, America is a fucking stupid country
Compared to the undeveloped countries like many African countries and the like, Sweden is actually a pretty good place; kind of equal (of course, never a 100% equal because politics are dumb) BUT, compared to Singapore, Denmark, Aussie, Japan or Taiwan...... The politics are dumb like they are in most countries, the schools are so bad and being a gifted child is horrible in Swedish schools because you get anxiety from doing new things due to being perfectionistic as hell, then there's also very poor knowledge in the books we have here and I found that in a high school book they didn't mention Meat as one of the main reasons for colon cancer. The economic lesson spreads the usual lies about the animal products and acts like eggs are healthy, along with them only mentioning that meat is increasing the risk for HEART-ATTACKS, nothing else. Along with them saying that vegetarians have to eat much of beans and such to get protein when in reality you actually do not need that much of beans due to there being protein in all vegetables as it exists naturally in them. In Sweden we have a test called ''Högskoleprovet'' which literally means ''High school test'' You can take it after completing elementary school at the age of around 16 (but possibly 15 or such if you skipped some grades), so. The högskole-provet has a system like this: *2* is the biggest result you can get on the test, *1* is what average person would manage to get at the högskole-prov so that's the normal giftedness of people, and *what is required to be a teacher is the result of 0,2*... That's like being 4 times as stupid as the average person... Yup. Which means people who have an IQ of 65 could possibly become teachers;-; Then we have the hospitals.. there's a crisis with the nurses and employees due to nurses getting low wages, along with the hospitals being chaotic when it comes to labor and births of children. Women have to wait for sometimes hours in places like Stockholm, people get hurt, it's just chaotic. If I became pregnant (which I, as a 13-year-old, would not) I would rather go to another country in order to be assured that I am safe at the hospital than give birth in the worst hospitals, although there are the smaller useless hospitals that rarely give much labour in the middle of some country-place. *What else? Oh, about the politics again, seeing the news of the politics is like watching ''The Kardashians'' Politicians version.* Most politicians do not have much education, and most just go into politics because they failed at being a businessman or the like and have no choice. There's still a bit of sexism among politicians OF COURSE since women apparently suck due to being too smart for men, and then the main point... *THEY DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING NO IMPORTANT LAWS THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT NATURE THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT EQUALITY OR THE SCHOOL OR HOSPITALS THEY RARELY MAKE CHANGES THEY JUST DISCUSS I HATE IT* What else? Well, that's it. Oh, and we have a huge crisis on teachers, which is due to them changing a simple law in the late 80s, they earn very little and again, are usually dumb. My English teacher misspells a lot of words during class although her accent is very mid-Atlantic, my wood-chop/woodcraft-teacher lacks grammar and writes really stupid sentences that look dumb, my economic teacher as mentioned earlier lacks knowledge while I knew a lot more about foods than her, my P.E teacher and 95% of teacher lack empathy at all and seem to not even know that disorders such as OCD, PTSD or extreme perfectionism exists, of course, they don't know about gifted children either.
OH right, America is very bad; they eat very unhealthy food; almost all Americans have a lack of vegetables in their diet, and they are the ones who eat and produce the most red meat in the world and basically the most meat in general, lots of dairy like Scandinavians as well, then there's the unhealthy breakfast and corn starch along with sugar in general. Next, the Republicans; racist, rich, unfair, selfish. Would write more detailed but a bit busy. Democrats: the opposite, but still a bit too conservative for me. Should think more about the climate, and maybe even more on the people which Obama was starting to do, ah.. if only he could be president a longer time than that... Also, so many people voting for Republicans means there are many racists in America, and there sure are. Americans are nationalists typically too, and if a whole nation basically becomes nationalistic it's turning into narcissism, but a narcissism of your country rather than yourself. There's no fat shaming, which causes, even more, people to turn obese. and politics again; A racist, homophobic, sexist, transphobic, discriminating rapist became president. As for politics, the election/voting system is *FREAKING OUTDATED*. It's not democratic at all because the people don't get the vote, it's the electors who do, in the end. One person can have more votes on average; like how Hillary had more votes than Dump, BUT.. electors matter more than the people, of course, and the system makes so much sense... it's more based on how people live than it's democratic. what if the liberal voters are spread across the whole US and not big in several states at all, but the Republicans are pretty heavy in certain areas? That's what decided the recent election, and that is not very democratic. It annoys me to HELL how you can have such an outdated, unlogical system *FOR ELECTING THE NEXT FRICKING PRESIDENT.* It's so unlogical, unprofessional, stupid. Politicians..
@@vinnyfatstacks1644 I think she was speaking of college. You wouldn't know anything about post secondary-education it seems--so you revert to your last successful time in school--3rd grade 😂 *You liberals and your education 😂 #YourDumbAndProud
Brix Keiffer Bataller actually humans were originally all lactose intolerant as most mammals are after sexual maturity but a mutation occured where humans could digest milk after sexual maturity.
U didn't cover why Asians evolved the Asian eye. Or why it evolved that way. I read it helped protect the eyes from sunnier or snowy regions in northern Asia but it doesn't make sense to me. I still have to squint when it's really sunny out! It's not like Asia gets significantly more sunlight than Europe...
biohazard737 Most programs on the topic I've seen suggest it was more sexual selection rather than natural selection. In other words, it was a desired trait to an ancient culture at some point and people with that feature eventually became dominant. It's much the same way dog breeders will breed dogs for specific traits they want to see passed down. It has little to do with the region or climate.
They probably were carrying milk in sheepskins attached to their camels, the swaying motion of the camel's gate churned the milk into cheese. So you should thank the camels!
You are rigth. Europeans evolved as violent cultures due to its limitations. Small continent many languages meaning wars and crimes all the time through the European story. Asia on the other side as the largest continent full of resources. The result was great civilizations and rich history. In Europe there is one exception and is the Mediterranean where many influences from all over the world.
+Walter Black because of political correctness.... and the dominant social group in the US happens to be in the median scale.. so why bother talking about it if you are not the top.. am i right?
+Walter Black Because your assertions have not been verified by scientific evidence and the studies that have been done do not validate you. The kind of people who use to tout this garbage about the intelligence of the blacks used it to justify slavery of the blacks, now they just do it to denigrate them as it validates their bigoted preconceptions. Racist clowns own this trope, your spin shows who you are.
GreaterThanGodLike race certainly isn't but the work ethic between ethnic groups plays a big factor in calculating once intelligence since.. the majority of "IQ" tests are an amalgamation of accumulated knowledge and exposure to more problem solving, thus you can indirectly conclude that certain races have more advantage.
Aaron Gordon if you're denying that certain groups evolved different characteristics over time, you're just denying evolution. Which makes you no better than a creationist. Throughout human history we had isolating barriers which kept the different groups more or less separated. As a result we now exhibit certain physical differences due to different biological histories.
Since when was the definition of evolution a difference in the genotype only. Google: the process by which different kinds of living organism are believed to have developed from earlier forms during the history of the earth.
A better explanation for the mutation of lactose tolerance, which probably required significant environmental pressure, was the ability to process lactose during famines. This would explain the rather rapid pace in the diffusion of the mutation.
Remember that Europe is very cold and dark during the winter. Milk is a good source of nutrition and vitamins during winter when there's a lack of sunlight and plants can't grow.
It is not about Europeans and Asians. It is about groups such as Aryan: Afghan, Indian, Caucasian, Slav, Germanics, Latins; Semites: Arabs, Ethiopians, Jews, Maltese, Somalis; Turkic: Kazakh, Turks, Uyghurs, Turkmen, Uzbeks; Uralic: Magyars, Estonians, Finns; No one should base it on modern culture separating Africans, Asians, Europeans, Amerindians...
Sir George Severn From the way I understand it, we have a couple of main categories; such as Caucasians, Africans etc; with sub-categories beneath those. And it is valid to refer to people both as their respective main or sub category.
***** Those minor differences are actually quite significant, and should not be underestimated. All it takes is a small change for you to potentially be born with brain damage or some other debilitating disease.
***** "Both are actually pretty stupid if you step back and look at it objectively" "the point I'm really trying to drive home is that we shouldn't treat people differently based on minute differences like skull shape." That's as subjective as you can get, so don't talk about seeing things objectively when the first thing you do is to insert your feelings, emotions and moral into a subject. What we get from your comment is: "For me, those differences are insignificant, because we shouldn't threat people differently, and you're stupid (you said, it look at it)"
I was only arguing about the way you dealt with the issue. Anyway, you should not ask me that when 0.01% of anything had been significant, because the answer is yes, in many things, and no, in many other things. And when you see that the difference with a chimp (according to some research less to others) is 1% and with a Denisovan is much less, then... But, I'm sure that if neanderthals and other human species were alive today (or if they were resurrected somehow) many "anthropology and sociology" students would be saying the same thing. Because how much difference is difference enough to accept that there are differences? I don't claim to know for sure about this, but for sure, it isn't professional this PC way of dealing with this subjects. It isn't objective/scientific at all.
***** Look, I followed this thing since the 80's. Not academically, just reading scientific stuff I stumbled with this, again and again. And read many times (since then) about how scientists refused to even talk about race for fear of being called racist or of some outraged clown try to destroy his career just because not liking the stuff. And I still reading about that today. And you know since when things are like this? since the late 40's, because of nazis, offended people "banned race". Suddenly someone/some people decided that race means another thing and it's bad. And therefore we are not separated by races anymore. Or ethnics (depending how PC is the one who opine). It's been like that since then (and a 40's decision doesn't look lie "modern science"...). Then someone came with the absolute batshit crazy stuff of "social constructions". And now with more precise studies and deeper knowledge they are leaning towards race again, that's the last (sorry I can't find now the publications, are not easy to find but I read 3 from last year and 2 from this one) "trend", and that's modern science... But anyway there is still debate among scientists about this subject so, no one can claim that "modern science" is in his/her opinion's side. When there's concesus then yes. And the great problem with PC people is that they are so prone to silence opposing or different ideas... Searching I just found this, it seems to be interesting kenanmalik.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/why-both-sides-are-wrong-in-the-race-debate/ Sorry for my english, I hope it wasn't too difficult to read.
+Эдуард Вятчанин What use would a hyena have to run for literally over 20 miles straight without slowing down. i bet they are capable but seriously running that long requires so much energy that for anything but a human who can have access to plenty of food it would be inefficient for any other animal and they simple wouldn't waste that much energy for no reason or even if it was for food. walking/trotting for over 20 miles? yea many animals do that. running? no.
Brave Cat if u pay attention to your biology class at school, u would know that hyenas' top speed is not as impressive as other big cats' like cheetahs and lions. instead of sprinting to chase down their prey, hyenas run a marathon to exhaust their prey, which often lasts for more than 20 miles. just so you know
+Эдуард Вятчанин You are correct (said a biology major and teacher). Moreover, humans are the best runners on the entire planet for the same reason. You mentioned cheetahs, did you know when cheetahs reach a certain body temperature, they just stop moving? At all. You can kick a lion in the chin, in a hot noon in the Savannah, and the lion will not budge. Many animals can run faster than humans, but we run more, thanks to the absurd amount of sudoriparous glands. One human have more capability of homeostasis (maintain the same amount of temperature, for example) than an entire herd of horses. We can chase anything, that's what put us in the apex of the food chain, we were born to run.
Marc Abelha is it just me or i thought some guys at nat geo busted the myth about cheetah overheating? though i cant really remember the details, i can recall that one of the dudes say that cheetahs' body temperature only rises after a succesful hunt, not during the sprint
+Seta-San which ones??? there is more genetic variety in the african continent between groups than when you compare africans to everyone else! Africans are so different from each other.
I guess because there are many different climates(people in africa are very diverse) in Africa and they were already adapted well enough to survive in there climates
do you listen to yourself? how fucking vague is that. clearly not all urasians can possibly have more in common with all Africans when they, according to you, have less in common with each other... If you're talking about the split between north African(mediterrian) Africans to sub-Saharan Africans I can understand....
I have never believed the out of Africa theory. We all evolved seperately. Asians, Africans and Europeans did not come from the same place. Finding artifacts is harder in Europe and Asia because of the seasonal changes which cause a lot of errosion. The artifacts are easier to preserve in dry places and Europe is smaler, so ciries were build and exoanded upon cities.Europeans and Asians have developped so many different tools, Innovations, architekture, food.. .So different from the central Africa humans. We do not even digest the same. Its rediculous to think we all came from one ancestor.
It’s impossible for us to have all evolved separately because populations evolve together. If we didn’t come from the same place we wouldn’t be the same species or able to breed. It’s the same concept as having family, you can’t have biological family without a shared ancestor. Africans have also developed many different things including food and architecture. Comparing everyone’s dna we find that all humans are 99.9% identical.
@@TmanRock9 we share 98% DNA with primates as well, this only proves we had a common ancestor at some point. I am talking about the evolution of the human species and cultures. Just because we found bones in Africa it means nothing. Because tausends of years cause a lot of change. Dog breeds can be mixed as well, humans bred them in different parts of the world and they all evolved seperately, with different traits, characters and so on. They did not all evolved from the same wolf, but from the wolf as a species, but the wolf was not native to only one area, not was there one wolf family. We all came from the homo sapiens ancestor but, the homo sapiens did not live only in Africa. He lived in Asia, Europe and so on. Those grops evolved seperately and according to the environment they chose.
@@andreabrava6899 yeas and if we share a common ancestor then that means we must all share an origin point. Modern humans are 99.9% identical meaning all humanities last common ancestor was in the last couple hundred thousand years or so tops, and it can be traced back into Africa. Finding the oldest Homo sapiens remains in Africa exclusively means a lot. Well sure once humans migrated out of Africa they evolved down separate paths, but we are all still the same species the out of Africa theory simply claims that humans originated in Africa and later left not that there wasn’t any evolution that occurred after divergence. All dogs do share a common ancestor mean the same individual ancestor. At one point I time yes Homo sapiens only lived in Africa. Homo sapiens have been in africa for at least 230,000 years before anyone was in Eurasia or the Americas. They only evolved separately after they split from the original population in Africa.
Don't know if you've noticed, but catering to idiots is kinda what you have to do... especially on the Internet. You did read the comments section didn't you?
Aaron Godley I was like you guys for a second then I realized that Europeans and Asians didn't evolve from each other. The title is asking why Europeans and Asians evolved from Africans in different ways to adapt to their new climates, of course he didn't speak as much to the Asian adaptations.
Odin029 I don't think they evolved from Africans as African features are highly dominant. In order for a population to remain Non African, you need a larger Non African population to digest the genetic input from Africa. Hence, the selective breeding between the Africans and Non Africans. The conclusion is there always was a sizable non African population in Asia. This theory is full of holes and what they have traced is simply the African slave trade route. The European slavers exported tribes of African slaves all over Asia. Even then the Asian population has always maintained the selective breeding with Africans to preserve their Non African Appearance. The two Asian races - Indo-Europeans and Sino have different but parallel evolutionary path to their African cousins. All three evolve from the same ancestors at some distant point in time.
Samuel Jones I think all of these changes happened well before the concept of slavery existed. Europeans didn't really start dealing in African slaves until the 16th century ad. I'm not sure how many African Slaves were sent to Asia by the Europeans because in their Asian colonies they tended to use indigenous people for labor.
Odin029 Nope. The African features are too dominant. There is no way pure Africans can produce an Asian. In order for Asians to make Asians in Asia, there had to be a very large Asian population to digest the little African input. Asians are also known to breed selectively with Africans because of their highly dominant African features and that's what keeps Asian population free of African features. This is a major sexual orientation that helped Asians keep themselves Non African. Even in Egypt where the Asians pushed the Africans towards the South, there was selective breeding till date in order to keep their Asian Features. The little DNA that you find outside of Africa doesn't prove that Africans Migrated to Asia or America. Its just what was left of the Slave trade. Before Europeans there were Arab Slave Traders. Negros in India were first brought by the Mughals. The slave trade was so bad that Entire tribes were processed and sent to plantations all over the world. You have been tracing these "ancient" genes and nothing else.
+The Bunny Suit Killer there's a difference between taking away people's right to hate on a national scale and refusing to provide a platform to hate on a RUclips vidio scale. Just face it, having one on such an inflammatory subject as, Anything to do with race, only attracts people like you.
There was no USA back then. And it was also Russian territory before American. Plus the land bridge would have included parts of Canada. So .... North America would be much more accurate.
a shame. the reactive stupid people who scream racism are the problem. they keep discussion of an actual thing taboo, subjecting everyone to the consequences of ignorance of true understanding and discussion of race.
That theory has been shelved. Lucy the fossil has been superseded by older fossils found in Europe. That is why the whole world except for black African's have the same mydricondial DNA so he is spouting rubbish.
I instantly came down here after I saw him pause and stare at his computer while clicking to the next page of his notes. This video is so poorly made no pictures or anything just some guy talking oddly.
It's like even he is not sure of what he is saying and just relying on the laptop. Ugh so cringey when he makes eye contact to the screen of the computer.
Northern Europeans are generally taller than southern Europeans because in a cold climate, both males and females reach puberty later so since they have not reach puberty, their bones have not closed up and their bones keep growing longer so they end up being taller on average. Southern Europeans who live in a warmer climate reach puberty earlier so their bones stop growing earlier therefore, they end up being shorter. This is why someone from Greece or southern Italy is usually shorter than someone from Sweden.
Slavery. Selective breeding over the tallest, strongest males with the tallest strongest females. Kind of like Horse-breeding. It sounds and is terrible, but that's the explanation why there are such huge Africans when their area is more suitable for more average sizes. Though the OP should correct it to extreme temperatures.
And some Nilotic tribes of the South Sudan are the tallest human species with an average male height 1.90m (6'3") and female average height of 1.80m (5'11"). You know what? The temperature there is very horrible.
Deserts have extreme cold during the night, though - in addition to extreme heat during the day. I think it's more that extreme temperatures create taller humans, and warm, moderate temperatures don't put that pressure on people. Unhealthy or shorter or weaker humans can live in moderate temperatures with plentiful food, but in extreme climates only the strong survive.
Atreiyu unfortunately this's not true for the region with these tribes. They live in an area with highest temperature of 36•C and average of 25•C and lowest of 16•C approximately. The weather is rather conducive instead of harsh. And that region is not part of the Sudan that borders the desert ( Sudan borders the desert in the northern part of the country). Actually all those conditions you mentioned were defied and inconsistent with the nature of these people. If it's science, then scientists have to make a better theory, this one is faulty and flawed. You can google the details I mentioned above.
Humans are the longest ranged land animal on the planet...there is evidence of humans following injured game for 80 miles over 2 days. This proves persistence hunting is not only a human trait but the ideal hunting scenario. No land animal on the planet can out walk a human...no matter how fast....humans will catch up.
+MrDerhanswurst What's wrong is that there are RUclipsrs in it. Sometimes I think the most misbegotten humans come here, and maybe to 4chan, although there's some crossover.
No! This cannot be true! All people are exactly the same, in every way, and have exactly the same potential, in every way! The only difference is culture!#socialjustice /sarcasm
i just dont understand how someone can think with an average functioning mind of any race thinks that one race is better then the other when their videos literally prove that we are all the same and idiots like you still doubt and wanna bring up iq scores
I didn't bring up IQ scores. And, I didn't compare races. I was mocking the idea that the only differences between individuals are cultural. How else can I help you today?
TheEqualizer2U like what..... we all came from africans and changed skin color and adapted to be immune to certain diseases that other races werent because of where they live and things they discovered. You are dumb if you think that 1 race is better then the other.
One correction. Lactose is a sugar not a protein. Lactose intolerance is not due to a protein like the allergy to peanuts. Instead, those who are lactose intolerant can't digest lactose. Thus the lactose sugar passes to the large intestine where it becomes food for bacteria that give off gas that causes bloating, pain and flatulence.
Lactose intolerance is a conspiracy created by the government to make people fart more, thereby releasing more methane, which poison our minds and allows them to take over the world and spread atheism, thus polluting our wholesome and intellectual Christian minds! Learn more at #LactoseFartConspiracy
Lactose intolerance IS due to a protein. Lactose is a sugar that is broken down to glucose and galactose by the enzyme Lactase in the small intestine. People with Lactose intolerance do not produce the enzyme Lactase. And ezymes are PROTEIN complexes.
Hillary Briss The issue is that D"News" confuses Casein phosphoproteins with Lactose disaccharides. People also often confuse lactose with _lactase_ ...the latter is indeed an enzyme, but the former is still a sugar. Helpful?
they're not facts because they can't be supported because as he said, it's not like we had cameras to film it all, it's all educated speculations based on hypothesies from fossils that we find, so none of this is 100% accurate and never will be.
+chuckchizzle No, there are actual ways of determining this. Genetics is one way of proving a lot of the hypothesized history of man kind. Natural selection often leaves evidence within the DNA, such as with human chromosome 2.
In the science category, this guy takes the prize for the worst. When I'm on auto play, his videos get selected. I'd never go to them voluntarily. This, however, shows it doesn't take much to be a youtube success. Maybe you should try.
Do you use the bathroom after consuming milk? That’s a sign of lactose intolerance. Also having softer stools/diarrhea is another sign of lactose intolerance. Overall most people can drink milk, but majority aren’t able to digest it very well.
we have 1 race homo sapiens with some having adoptations from thousands of generations because of the enviroment they lived in... being it skin color certain food adaptations disease fighting adoptations ect ect..
It does say we are very uniform genetically with the difference not being relevant enough to constitute a taxonomic division, which is what a race would be.
the term "race" is not really scientific, I think species and subspecies is what you would say. In english however "race" is still used to refer to people with a shared appearance and culture. That is weird however.
The reason we are better hunters than animals is because we are fast runners and have tools even though we don't have claws and sharp tooth. Ha ha! Animals everywhere would be offended... if they had the internet. LOL
Donax, dear, I'm sorry you misunderstood. I was quoting the idiot and laughing at his nonsense, not agreeing with him. Take care. Have a good weekend ahead.
I don't think evolution is entirely true. There is something else going on here. Your features and skin color are mostly, I'd even say, 100% genetic. Just because you move to a different place, you will not become light-skinned. Whites, Blacks and Asians are perhaps different sub-species of humans. However we all work the same internally but that's a different story. Blacks have been living in the United states for over 200 years and have spawned several tens of generations, yet they still look black. So this theory of you start evolving based on your climate may not be true. I know people say evolution takes geologic time scales like 100,000 years but what evolution suggests is that if you took a huge black population out of Africa and put them in North America without any further mixing with other races and come back 100,000 years later, they will no longer be black? Sorry, I don't buy that theory.
+James Grant but humans are not free of those risks just because they move to another planet. I think earth's atmosphere is quite beneficial to us when it comes to protecting us from minor asteroid shit storms.
+JonnyC 289 you realize that our planet is "dying" because of our pollution right... it will kill us all if we keep going like this. even if we stop, eventually our sun will die out and also kill us all
Asjen Mensink correct! Any word ending with ""ose"" is a sweet tasting carbohydrate that our liver turns into "Glucose" which is a fuel for our bodies.
@Enter the future. Not really, unless you are really trying say all foods are made out of carbon dioxide, water and sometimes fixed nitrogen! Because plants fix CO2 and water to make produce sugars that they metabolize into a variety of intermediate metabolites, some incorporating fixed nitrogen (like ammonia and nitrates). Using these to make amino acids, that are used to make proteins. But if you mean proteins are carbohydrates,. no they are not. They are polymers of amino acids and a different class of biomolecules.
@Joihn Ecker mostly right! -ose designates a carbohydrate. Many of the small ones that consist of just a couple of subunits are sweet to varying degrees. But not all of them. And some, like cellulose are huge polymers that are not sweet at all. -ase designates an enzyme, usually acting on a substrate that precedes the -ase. As an aside. A number of dipeptides are extremely sweet. Aspartame is one of them. Curiously, many dextro-amino acids are also very sweet. Unlike the levo amino acids we use in proteins. I've tasted dextro-tryptohan, which is very sweet and tastes pretty good. Unlike levo-tryptohan which is tastes a bit like mothballs smell.
Seems you didn't mention native Australians. They must've been part of the very earliest of human migration out of Africa. Even before the ones you mentioned in asia with the Laos skull. It's believed they've been on the continent around 60k years
I had to stop less than a minute in when you said "evolution forces adaptation". Please research what those terms mean before you make videos like this.
Thomas Baker the fact that your arguing about it kind of shows each of your lack of understanding. Individual mutation does force adaptation. The process of evolution also forces adaptation. The process of adaptation favors those capable of successfully adapting, and Vice Versa. Quite your bitching.
I think of the "Siberian Fox Experiment", where a fur farm wanted to domesticate foxes to be able to handle them easier. They bred the most tame ones. What happened was astounding! The fox's DNA changed as they got tamer and tamer to having spotted coats, curly tails, floppier ears and started to bark and play like dogs! Not only would this explain how changes in wolves transformed them into dogs as they became more domesticated, but could explain the many changes to the human genome. Look it up...fascinating study!
This is called domestication syndrome and humans do in fact have it. Compared to our ancestors our mouths are smaller, we’ve lost certain muscles, our heads are rounder…many other features as well. We did in fact domesticate ourselves
Not that fascinating... we genetically engineered foxes to be more like dogs..... Makes sense. Similar animal. We're forcing the breeding and mating to favor traits which are favorable to us rather than suited to their natural wild environment so their survival depends on carrying traits favored by humans. Makes perfect sense and actually acts as proof of evolution if anything. It's only fascinating if you just learned the theory of evolution two days ago.
@@laurajaneluvsbeauty9596 well yeah. We're not feral. Think about beauty standards. Who are the most successful in terms of sex? Those we consider attractive. Thus those traits are passed on more often. Short women are preffered so those traits survive. Women stay short. Men get taller because tall men are preferred. Darker skin is more successful. Curvy bodies for women are more successful while muscular and Lean body types for men are more successful. Smaller noses are more successful. Large buttocks are proving to be a sticking trend that may translate into traits passed on just like bigger breasts (men developed a love for bigger breasts because it suggests on a primitive level that the women is more fertile and can sufficiently feed lots of children. This isnt 10p% true but men keep picking these traits so after so many generations you started seeing more and more women with bigger breasts and more men who are attracted to them to the point it's most men now) Evolution is all about sex. Nature doesent magically know what features you need to survive. It's the animals who pick features in their mates that end up helping them and their children survive. And these traits that are successful keep getting picked and eventually reinforced. So humans have the potential to guide our evolution In such a way we actually regress. That is highly possible. We can breed ourselves into being a race of short big booty morons with big chests and low brows and thick thighs just because we keep reinforcing beauty standards. OR we could become a race of ditzy statuesque anorexic models not suited for physical labor and combat nor building and agriculture. Experts predict the next species Will be highly influenced by technology to the point they'll have an extra eyelid to filter blue lights and hunched backs and cramped hands.
Why did humans evolve different physical characteristics? For example, if aliens landed on Earth and saw a Swede and an Australian Aborigine standing together, they would assume they`re a different species.
RoyalFox Thats why he is so incorrect to blame drinking Milk on our skin colour, its happened over a long time all due to climate, hot climate black skin, cool climate white skin, its part of our DNA & he is talking bs as I passed My BHS on this particular topic!🌎💥
There isn't a place on Earth where most ppl don't drink Milk, we are weaned on it & so is every Mammal esp domestic Cats, but adult Cats shouldn't have Milk as they have problems & can't digest it any better than a Dog, both are meat eaters yet ppl have always assumed Adult Cats drink Milk, they will given the chance as a Dog would & most mammals but how many ppl give Dogs milk with their food? Cats should drink water only with meat not Milk! Man is whatever colour due only to the climate his ancesters lived in up leaving for a different place & climate!💥
but milk itself is protein rich. it just so happens that to get all the proteins you gotta drink the milk -fat, protein and lactose included- and whoever didn't have the lactose-tolerant mutation couldn't, then, have all them fats/proteic nutrition that would come along with it.
A lot of your information is simply incorrect and misleading. Many of those races and subspecies of humans that left Africa died out leaving only the Homo Sapiens. The migrating to agriculture does play a role and crossing the land bridge is correct. However since then there has only been about 100,000 years which is certainly not long enough for evolution to take place, human populations haven't been isolated for long enough. The only genetic variation that took place are those that regulate superficial things like hair form and skin color, and those slight variations cannot account for a Difference among humans.(Genetically speaking)
+ZackJay Didn't blue eyes appear in Europe only 10,000 years ago or so? Light skin an adaptation to low sunlight climates? Same for the gene to allow digestion of milk. You are right in saying that evolution is a glacially slow process, though.
Not necessarily an adaptation, like eye color the migration plays a role as selection pressure was not as intense for dark skin due to climate which allowed for the genes to mutate. Eye color is not linked to a single gene its a mixture of different ones. But there is no evidence for evolutionary difference among humans as we share upwards of 85% genetic code
+ZackJay That isn't entirely accurate. In recent years, scientists have begun to realise that genetic adaptations can occur suddenly and in a much shorter time frame than had previously been thought possible. I recently had the pleasure of seeing a talk given by Dr Robert Winston on genetics, that discussed this and highlighted just how little we really know or understand genetic evolution. Small mutations can occur within just a few generations and yet, in terms of our dna, even the smallest mutations can have a profound affect on our bodies and their functions. There was a study conducted on the ability of different racial groups to cope best with famine conditions. Not surprisingly, groups of people that have lived in historically marginal regions (where food scarcity has always been an ever present danger) were genetically pre-disposed to cope with famine, nutrition shortage and long term survival under those conditions, remote locations in asia, africa and the like. They had expected this. What did surprise them was that in the far north of sweden it was found that the more isolated communites there also had a pre-disposition on par with the afore-mentioned areas. Which also makes sense, cold isolated regions where seasonal conditions could render easy access to food a distant dream. What surprised them was that these communites hadn't been present as long as would have been anticipated for such adaptation to occur, especially when their more southernly swedish neighbours further south in the region had coping capacity on par with other europeans (which was much lower, harder time coping with nutrition shortage). The study went some way to show that, given right conditions, genetic mutation and adaptation could take place in a much shorter time frame than science had previously believed was required. The same can be said for numerous other communities around the world. Evolution isn't just the great big leaps between sub-species. Small changes and drift are taking place all the time. We've only just started looking at genes in any meaningful way, we should be careful in rushing to conclusions because we can be sure to have 95% of what we think we know today, proven wrong tmorrow.
Hold on...I'm a Nigerian from those tribes you mentioned and literally I haven't met or seen any person with lactose intolerance before,It does not even rank as one of the major health issue.I take what most people will consider too much Milk and Milo chocolate drink every morning without having a single stomach ache talkless of Intolerance, tbh I don't think those researchers did a good job at all.
The food allergy thing is a really interesting fact aswell, something happened in the 80-90's that made it the problem it is today. Aus scientist trying to pin it down for ages. Probly pesticides but who knows
What?..My name is Elizabeth Collins because my ancestors converted to Christianity...I've never been to the US. before in my life,I'm purely African with absolutely no breakage in my family tree...Please next time don't just assume things like that.
The problem with 'race exists' is it leads to racism and nonsense like 'Africans are a different species'. We are all Africans. We all evolved in Africa around 200,000 years ago from a number of around 10,500. Which means, we are all related. We are not only all one species, but in many ways, we are all one 'race' (in fact, many scientists don't even use the term 'race' because it's so useless). Then we went to India and China and became Germanic people later in the North/West, and others, and later became Angles-Saxons, Celts, Romans, etc. in Great Britain (skipped a lot of history, just focusing on England/America now). So, everybody in England and America is really just a Germanic person or Dutch/Roman/Greek in some cases, in a way. The first people to be called 'English' were the Angles, a Germanic tribe from the East. And almost all Americans are English or Germanic (Dutch, etc.). Unless they are Mexican, Spanish, African, Native, etc. so, there's not even such a thing as a 'white American' or 'an English person'. Most of us are just from Germanic Europe. For sure, there's no such thing as a 'white American' because 'American' means everybody from the Americas, not the US, and you're only about 300 years old, so, you're simply not old enough to be a 'white American', you're just a Dutch or English person. Your mother and father could be American, but that doesn't really make you American in any meaningful way. This explains why it's one of the few places where if you're born there, it makes you 'American' or is able to. If you're born on French land, that doesn't magically make you French. We only have to go back to your grandparents or great-grandparents and you're not American (and your DNA would show clearly that you're mostly Euporean/British). Thus some have called American nationalism 'hubris at its finest'. It's really hated by everybody other than Americans. I suppose it's like being born in the North of England vs the South of England. It doesn't make much sense to try and act as if you're a completely different Englishman having been born in one or the other. There's no real difference other than dialect. But, I suppose, the Americans have this system because otherwise, they would need to call themselves 'US Europeans' or 'British-Germanic Americans', some people have suggested the term 'USer' instead of 'American', but my problem isn't with the term 'American' itself, more the fact they think it means something and my problem with American nationalism. In fact, it's so strange it creates more an American supremacy, 'rawr, my parents were born here, therefore, I'm a real American [white] and better than you'. No wonder America pretty much invented white supremacy. And all modern humans (every human alive today and there are no other humanoids left, either) is part of the same species. A species is defined as that which you can create offspring with. So, the Neanderthals were, in fact, humans. And even you didn't know that Africans are the same species, they have to be, anyway, because Africans can create offspring with both Asians and Europeans (any other human, for that matter).
Thank you for not doing your research Warhammer Workshop because Asians and Europeans originate in Asia, not Africa as previously believed. There have been studies on this and you can easily find them unless you're scared of becoming "racist" which by the way is biological in humans. Humans should and are racist by default.
The video was interesting and informative, but had little to do with the title of the video. You look at the name of a video and create expectations, deciding whether or not to watch it. So is naming things accurately too much to ask?
Kgcopper Yeah fuck D-news and this guy that commentated on it. I always fall for the title because it sounds interesting then when I watch it, they talk about something else that is not what the title suggested.
Misleading title, but the video interesting
Kgcopper did you miss the part where he talked about the difference in how we evovled differently?
TwiztidMaGiC No I didn't. Did you miss the part where never got around to telling us exactly the difference between how Asians and Europeans evolved? Which is what the video's title would lead one to believe, it being called "Why Europeans and Asians Evolved So Differently".
Kgcopper where does native americans originate from? He's talking about people migrating from Africa to europe and asia and how they evolved differently, but that must have skipped your attention completely?
title: Why Europeans And Asians Evolved So Differently
thumbnail: a white and black person looking at each other
Aili Yu lmao
Aili Yu silly, yes.
Aili Yu hahahha
Aili Yu *black and white
Orppranator
Uh oh, somebody called the language police.
They didn't "Evolve" differently. They just "Look different" moderately on the surface. That has to do with "Who" exited Africa, from what tribe or shape and size, and then started a colony "Somewhere" else. It also has to do with Diet, and adaption to environment. If you go to the DNA "Ground 0" Tribe in Africa, and looked at them, you'd see all the "Races" which are actually tribes, of the world in their faces. Regardless of pigment of skin, which is not evolutionary, but an adaption.
Dee evolved differently. Similar to lions and tigers. Both tigers and modern lions Dee evolved differently from prehistoric Lions.
Africa's myth was debunked.
@@jahshjahsh2002Never was.
Childish research..no evidence sweetheart
When you watch a "smart" video on RUclips and you feel enlightened af.
+rotenpeas exactly
+Gery A
This is true, on another video he claims scientists recovered DNA from "The Red deer people", and claimed there was no matches with any other hominid, but I can't find any evidence.
Trace's shirt is too cute.
it is
Jclar50 it's TOO cute?! I'll never wear it again! I just wanted to go for regular cute!
Trace Dominguez You've worn it several days now! or maybe...?
Trace Dominguez just saying... what did the butter and roll evolve from. I'm just... really confused. but the butter can speak so a piece of butter with human DNA... seems logical to me.
Trace Dominguez Omg! The great Trace has responded to my comment. This... this is too much! TT____TT
I recently finished anthropology and in the textbook it said that milk started in the regions of northern Europe and Ethiopia something I guess these guys left out I didn't hear a mention of milk starting in Ethiopia and I don't even know how milk would be from the persian empire since again my class was more recent and they didn't say the mutation to process milk started in Iran so overall I agree with the comments it's a waste of time, I can't belive I used to watch this channel
Find me one non native-american person who gets fat by eating corn, beans and squash.
so, how did the thought that paler skin is superior to darker skin come about again?
@@elliotrook6063 Mediterraneans are more advanced. Big Civilizations were born around Mediterranean. Not in Europe. Europe is in the game last millennia thanks to Mediterraneans.
fatih true
@@heyula07 True.
fatih southern europe is part of the Mediterranean sea so there also Mediterranean unless you talking about north africa
He didn't explain why Asians look different to Europeans.
He explained skin tone. Body size is affected by climate and nutrition, climate can also affect the face (e.g. certain nose/nostril shapes work better in cold climates). There's also genetic 'drift' of isolated groups, and I suspect selective breeding due to each culture's perceptions of beauty.
gammarayburst He explained why white people are paler than black people. Why are Asians half way 'between?
Smaller bowls of cereal.
racist
He didn't explain why the same hybrids (H.s.s. x H.s.n.) look so different.
Anyone else come looking for a theory on why East Asians and Europeans have such different facial features and leave disappointed?
maswell That's probably just genetic drift. I doubt it's adaptive in any way.
maswell People think Mongoloids (what Americans call Asians) have epicanthic folds (squinty eyes) to prevent glare from snow, and that they have pedomorphic bodies (smaller limbs in relation to torso) in order to reduce surface area and conserve heat. Smaller facial features likewise reduce surface area and prevents frostbite
maswell That was an expectation of yours, not something promised in the title.
maswell not before voting down.
Conrad Crane Better compared to what?
He lost me when he said "female cows." Please, show me a male cow.
Male bull
Male bull
He is a pleb.
😂🤣
A Cow in the Mail
Such a bait title. And really unprofessional narrator. I don't need someone to read to me. Come on, Discovery.
Would you prefer evalion haha lol
+EVILIMPERIALISM23 Evalion is bae
+OOO BBB she might be cute but she's a horrible person lol .
EVILIMPERIALISM23 For what reason ?
+OOO BBB you support racism ??
The thumbnail pic shows a black guy, not asian
That's the point
He could be Indian
Squipy he is from Pakistan
schokohase498 I can instantly tell Indians apart from others. That guy is definitely black. No way in fuck he's of Indian origin, unless he's an immigrant.
Bruce Wayne yeah, he looks like an afroamerican, maybe half caucasian. Just a thought, maybe the lighter skinned one in the thumbnail is the asian one and Trace just doesn't know what a european is?
Guy's got stones for leaving the comments ON, this is brutal. LMAO
does it drive up traffic having more comments?
Haha for real. He's being eviscerated 🤣
He's doing the right thing, if pl read the comments they won't get misinformed as much
I love how the titel says europeans and asians but they show caucasian and black .well done good job
Glossy Bubble quite a bit...he's trying to explain y they evolved differently
Europeans are caucasian.
@ actually cacuasian people are georgians, armenians, azerbaijanis, turks and iranians.
@Realistic Views the same species**
@@someone-3065 lmao. That's not true
after hundred thousands of years i believe i'm evolving to a couch potato.
haha
lol
were all primates like or not biology does not lie and religion is full of shit
+Aspie Otaku I don't like it, and it's not true my dear.
Salman Qasim But it is we are primates and classified as such were not made of dirt and ribs we are better than that, there are no talking snakes or burning bushes as much as you dont like it it does not beat fact! Genetic data and evidence in the fossil record backs it up as well as physical evidence from apes sharing the same behavior and using tools! More evidence is the skeleton and skull of an ape looks almost like that of a humans! The Bonobo stands upright and shares human characteristics and also has sexual positions like humans do including performing fellatio! Human and ape organs are interchange able in donations as well and apes can interperate human sighn languages as a means of communication as well. I can go on but your tiny mind cannot comprehend nor have the capacity to open up and learn more of anything!
Should be called "Man reads Wikipedia page to camera"
lol
lol
Lmao
Lol lmao
He said he had done research from many places. So I think he had taken notes, but couldn't just memorize it all and had to refer to his notes. Any of us would do the same.
I was gonna watch this because I'm curious why different types of people have different features, but I think the comments saved me lol.
My genes mixed with yours would make the perfect human.
@@amcclaur80012 he looks actually like a trans dude ....cringeeee😬
@@Mat-zt4bi and? What's wrong with being trans? She still seems beautiful
@@pallaciccione7885 he* and...no
@@Mat-zt4bi okkk Mr. I feel special disregarding other
Lactose is a sugar not a protein
Correct!
May God bless you!
Also hunter-gatherers were before nomads not the other way around.
@@Muhammad-sx7wr Hunter gatherers are also nomads.
@@abubaseet
You are right. However generally I presume they usually are referring to pastoralists. انا بسيط و احب البسطاء
I can film myself reading wikipedia too.
@Miguelle Landry is a perfect 10 Sorry, I missed the part where anyone cares.
👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌
then do it
+1
lmao so true. This whole setup is trash
Speaking as a biologist, this video has enough errors to make it dreadfully misleading
+princenbl Yeah, it was pretty cringe worthy...
+princenbl As a power engineer by education and software person byt trade, I can't spot the errors. Maybe you could please elaborate?
+hoijarvi Lactose intolerance in Native Americans is closer to 74%. In the Igbo and yoruba, it's about 96 and 99% respectively, though this figure is not so much lactose intolerance as it is lactose malabsorption. This means people from these tribes can and do eat diary, but they cannot consume it in large quantities like Northern European's can. It is very different from being intolerant, which means you fall sick after consuming lactose. They don't. You can also think of it as partial intolerance. As a matter of fact, many milk products are now breakfast staples in southern Nigeria, which is where you find the Yoruba and Igbo groups
+hoijarvi As for Skin colour having something to do with eating cereals, I'm not sure there's any consensus about that. www.ted.com/talks/nina_jablonski_breaks_the_illusion_of_skin_color?language=en
+princenbl Thanks. On skin color: I've read it's UV and vitamin D. Grain contains little vitamin D, so thousands of years of high grain diet has made Egyptians much lighter than hunter-gatherers from central Africa; they need to get vitamin D from UV radiation. Eskimos and Lapps have darker skin than Scandinavians, because of diet high in animal protein and the thinner ozone layer close to poles. I'm surprised the speaker did not mention this.
Isn't lactose a sugar not a protein Trace? Hence why it ends in -ose
PotatoesAreGood :3 TRUE.
PotatoesAreGood :3 I was about to point that out
Michel Etienne Sartre we're talking about lactose*
I got on a roll and misspoke! thanks for looking out y'all :D
Trace Dominguez 6:57 lactose is not a proteine is a sugar ;-)
This is the first time I clicked on this guy's channel and I sincerely can't understand why he has 400k subs. He doesn't do anything at all appart from reading from Wikipedia, which all of you can do. Ew.
Another example of RUclips's selective and demanding crowd.
or notes he's taken from encyclopedia.com
Tom Chhkuot Everything you say is ok. Maybe you prefer podcast, but RUclips is the biggest web on earth to watch... videos. Yeah, videos.
So... your whole argument is invalid, and this guy still is terribly overrated.
i think its ways to earn money this kind of systematic ideas you can earn money everyone had choice to do they want or like, guessing that not everybody like to read on there own but podcast will do to at least increase there knowledge beyond others interest or field of studies.
Exactly...BORING!! I knew this when l was 8!
Samui Style And that's why I don't have 400k subscribers. But I didn't expect them neither, because I don't work like many others do in their RUclips channels. This guy doesn't, he's just having a laugh at you, lazy people not even able to read from Wikipedia.
Why is every comment section of evolutional videos on RUclips infested with irrational and belligerent children.
good question
+William Bengt
Yet there is no question mark.
That should be a D news video subject...
Treat others how you want to be treated how on earth is evolution childiss and irrational?
Treat others how you want to be treated you know evolution isn't about the origin of the first life, ift's about the adaptation of life to it's environment over time due to "survival of the fitest" and descent with inherited characteristics. This is something that is observable in the present world and for which there is a lot of experimental evidence.
"the title is misleading" ..except, it isn't. He explains how and why we evolved differently, not why we have such distinct phenotypes.
Kyle Kimberley Exactly! It is interesting how our society has become obsessed with appearance/race, and that phenotype is all we think about with regards to evolution and different groups of people... I came to learn more about why Europeans have fostered addiction to power and colonialism more than others. LOL.
It's the same thing.
@@exittheloop2445 racist
I don't care what anyone says. NIGGAS RULE.
@@exittheloop2445 Degenerate
Why Europeans and Asians evolved so differently
*Shows a black guy and a white woman*
igotbigdick 999 the woman is European or of European descent
It boggles my mind actually like dude you had one job
Ikr i was thats africa friend
Don’t they always show blacks?
Why does this channel never cite the sources?
+Presidential Candidate Deez Nuts Many channels post links and cite their sources in their description box. Anybody can say "science has said" or "anthropologists have found," which is why I asked. He doesn't even mention a name or title of a peer reviewed journal here. This isn't the only channel doing it. Links to his Twitter account does not qualify as a citation, fool.
You know, that's a really good point. They could at least cite the sources in the form of a URL on the bottom as he states a fact.
That would take more work than just making stuff up.
true but remember, this the discovery channel
+Peri Grinn who cares?
You have to hand it to this guy. He literally just reads off a wikipedia page and gets millions of views. Hardly even bothers to edit the videos. Get them coins!!! lol
youtubeuser LMAO
Life goals
he does but then he has a gift of speaking so we want to losten
lol He has a gift of reading off that screen. Another day another dollar.
I don't know if he got this off wikipedia but he got it from some source(s) which is fine. nobody knows everything, including your doctor. hence all the reference books in lawyer's offices, etc. If he had memorized the material, perhaps he could have looked at the camera more and it would appear that he just "knows" all this stuff.
I'm a teacher and i think he did just fine. he spoke clearly, he referred to his notes and he communicated. even presidents have speeches on teleprompters or on paper, and that's just a speech. but, hey, haters gotta hate
"Modern humans moved out of East Africa as tiny little squirrel things" After he said that, I started having a bad feeling about this 😳
That's when I stopped watching the video hahah
He was trying to be funny...except that it wasn't.
He is being facetious, but we were fish and reptiles before we were.. "little squirrel things" according to Naked Science -- Mankind Rising - Where do Humans Come From
That's actually not such a crazy take. There is mounting evidence that proto humans did leave the African continent then return to it only to leave again tens of thousands of years later as homo erectus. Where they met other humans who never did return and at that point had already diverged themselves into several subspecies (neanderthal/denisovan)
@@suzukisixk7 Neanderthals and Denisovans aren't human, but apelike humanoids. They were a separate species altogether, grafted almost with the same amount of chromosomes as we true humans -- designed to corrupt the gene pool, like the Nephlim gene pool. Over time, they were able to fully mixed with true humans.
The thumbnail shows a black and a white person. You guys need a pair of new glasses?
I thought the same thing
Yeah, but the video really doesn't have anything to do with Asians. The title is what they screwed up.
I love this guy and all these videos are awesome...but he said "the *protein* lactose..." 😥and it keeps waking me up from my sleep
His voice is pretty gay >_
@@withastickangrywhiteman2822 voices don't have sexual orientations, and your reply has nothing to do with the comment jedi 620 made. Lactose is a sugar found in milk, which is what the original comment was referring to, where in the video the host refers to it as a protein.
Milk has protein! Wtf
wait why is everyone in the comments section pissed off
Welcome to RUclips comments!
They are many overly sensitive people in this world...
Blame it on Darwin!
Because they don't like a guy just reading and would prefer to see pictures and stuff. Lol
Because he said Neanderthals fucked Europeans..........
I just devolved watching this fml
Paul Williams Stud!
I came here to learn why Asians have shorter eyes than Europeans.
I did not get the answer I wanted, but I learnt that a lot of people still couldn't drink milk, so I'm satisfied.
Samovar maker you haven't seen the Asians lately. much it is food supply related. they are no longer short.
Asians are still short lol, maybe not as much as before but it's the Americans fault for giving them tons of heart-diseases and cancer because of animal products, and them getting taller because of it makes it even worse for the heart, America is a fucking stupid country
Compared to the undeveloped countries like many African countries and the like, Sweden is actually a pretty good place; kind of equal (of course, never a 100% equal because politics are dumb)
BUT, compared to Singapore, Denmark, Aussie, Japan or Taiwan......
The politics are dumb like they are in most countries, the schools are so bad and being a gifted child is horrible in Swedish schools because you get anxiety from doing new things due to being perfectionistic as hell, then there's also very poor knowledge in the books we have here and I found that in a high school book they didn't mention Meat as one of the main reasons for colon cancer. The economic lesson spreads the usual lies about the animal products and acts like eggs are healthy, along with them only mentioning that meat is increasing the risk for HEART-ATTACKS, nothing else. Along with them saying that vegetarians have to eat much of beans and such to get protein when in reality you actually do not need that much of beans due to there being protein in all vegetables as it exists naturally in them.
In Sweden we have a test called ''Högskoleprovet'' which literally means ''High school test'' You can take it after completing elementary school at the age of around 16 (but possibly 15 or such if you skipped some grades), so. The högskole-provet has a system like this: *2* is the biggest result you can get on the test, *1* is what average person would manage to get at the högskole-prov so that's the normal giftedness of people, and *what is required to be a teacher is the result of 0,2*... That's like being 4 times as stupid as the average person... Yup. Which means people who have an IQ of 65 could possibly become teachers;-;
Then we have the hospitals.. there's a crisis with the nurses and employees due to nurses getting low wages, along with the hospitals being chaotic when it comes to labor and births of children. Women have to wait for sometimes hours in places like Stockholm, people get hurt, it's just chaotic. If I became pregnant (which I, as a 13-year-old, would not) I would rather go to another country in order to be assured that I am safe at the hospital than give birth in the worst hospitals, although there are the smaller useless hospitals that rarely give much labour in the middle of some country-place.
*What else? Oh, about the politics again, seeing the news of the politics is like watching ''The Kardashians'' Politicians version.* Most politicians do not have much education, and most just go into politics because they failed at being a businessman or the like and have no choice. There's still a bit of sexism among politicians OF COURSE since women apparently suck due to being too smart for men, and then the main point...
*THEY DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING NO IMPORTANT LAWS THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT NATURE THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT EQUALITY OR THE SCHOOL OR HOSPITALS THEY RARELY MAKE CHANGES THEY JUST DISCUSS I HATE IT*
What else? Well, that's it. Oh, and we have a huge crisis on teachers, which is due to them changing a simple law in the late 80s, they earn very little and again, are usually dumb. My English teacher misspells a lot of words during class although her accent is very mid-Atlantic, my wood-chop/woodcraft-teacher lacks grammar and writes really stupid sentences that look dumb, my economic teacher as mentioned earlier lacks knowledge while I knew a lot more about foods than her, my P.E teacher and 95% of teacher lack empathy at all and seem to not even know that disorders such as OCD, PTSD or extreme perfectionism exists, of course, they don't know about gifted children either.
OH right, America is very bad; they eat very unhealthy food; almost all Americans have a lack of vegetables in their diet, and they are the ones who eat and produce the most red meat in the world and basically the most meat in general, lots of dairy like Scandinavians as well, then there's the unhealthy breakfast and corn starch along with sugar in general.
Next, the Republicans; racist, rich, unfair, selfish. Would write more detailed but a bit busy.
Democrats: the opposite, but still a bit too conservative for me. Should think more about the climate, and maybe even more on the people which Obama was starting to do, ah.. if only he could be president a longer time than that...
Also, so many people voting for Republicans means there are many racists in America, and there sure are.
Americans are nationalists typically too, and if a whole nation basically becomes nationalistic it's turning into narcissism, but a narcissism of your country rather than yourself.
There's no fat shaming, which causes, even more, people to turn obese.
and politics again;
A racist, homophobic, sexist, transphobic, discriminating rapist became president.
As for politics, the election/voting system is *FREAKING OUTDATED*.
It's not democratic at all because the people don't get the vote, it's the electors who do, in the end. One person can have more votes on average; like how Hillary had more votes than Dump, BUT.. electors matter more than the people, of course, and the system makes so much sense...
it's more based on how people live than it's democratic. what if the liberal voters are spread across the whole US and not big in several states at all, but the Republicans are pretty heavy in certain areas? That's what decided the recent election, and that is not very democratic. It annoys me to HELL how you can have such an outdated, unlogical system *FOR ELECTING THE NEXT FRICKING PRESIDENT.* It's so unlogical, unprofessional, stupid. Politicians..
Kate The Moo haha have fun under trump you're welcome
The comment section is more interesting than the video
Yea in majority of the videos it is.
Your comment just made this very true.
There are lots of strange folks out there!
milk dose a bowel movement good
Yep
"Lactose is the sugar component of milk" - not protein.
your right my 1st quarter of bio1 tells me your correct because most sugars end in "ose" while enzymes(protein) end in "ase"
@@vinnyfatstacks1644 I think she was speaking of college. You wouldn't know anything about post secondary-education it seems--so you revert to your last successful time in school--3rd grade 😂
*You liberals and your education 😂 #YourDumbAndProud
“Modern humans moved out of Africa”
What, Africans aren’t modern humans?
No, they are the unmixed human. The oldest genetically, not a bad thing honestly.
Correct South Africans were not moderen humans by culture or taxonomy
@@bnoyb4621yes it is lol look at how their society was before whites got their they were hunter gatherers
@kaosisback8376 don't u think it would've been vest if white people just left them alone?
video title should be "how humAns becAme lactose intolerant"
Brix Keiffer Bataller actually humans were originally all lactose intolerant as most mammals are after sexual maturity but a mutation occured where humans could digest milk after sexual maturity.
You got it backwards
U didn't cover why Asians evolved the Asian eye. Or why it evolved that way. I read it helped protect the eyes from sunnier or snowy regions in northern Asia but it doesn't make sense to me. I still have to squint when it's really sunny out! It's not like Asia gets significantly more sunlight than Europe...
biohazard737 Most programs on the topic I've seen suggest it was more sexual selection rather than natural selection. In other words, it was a desired trait to an ancient culture at some point and people with that feature eventually became dominant. It's much the same way dog breeders will breed dogs for specific traits they want to see passed down. It has little to do with the region or climate.
***** never thought of that, thanks
Africans and Europeans can also have "asian eyes".
james learing the proper term is epicanthic fold and there are different degrees, start and end points.
zeiitgeist I know that. I'm just saying that it's not exclusive to mongoloids.
i just want to take this opportunity to give a shout out to the people who invented cheese. I love you and always will
The people of Wisconsin thank you.
Can't live without my sharp cheddar~
you're welcome
I hate them. now its easier to get fat.
They probably were carrying milk in sheepskins attached to their camels, the swaying motion of the camel's gate churned the milk into cheese. So you should thank the camels!
You are rigth. Europeans evolved as violent cultures due to its limitations. Small continent many languages meaning wars and crimes all the time through the European story.
Asia on the other side as the largest continent full of resources. The result was great civilizations and rich history.
In Europe there is one exception and is the Mediterranean where many influences from all over the world.
@johnMurrayof2008 History proves otherwise.
@JohnFitzgerald2008
Lol ww1 killed a lot hahaha
And you stole arab science and maths
@JohnFitzgerald2008Asians have the highest IQ
why is my whole family purple except me?
go to a doctor
that was funny. now let's wait for the race war of who's most racist.
+Chase Nicholson cyanide poisoning that is why, stop trying to kill you family
You don't have enough colloidal silver in your diet.
you need egg plant in your diet
I was going to leave a comment about how stupid this video was but after reading the comments section it seems the job has been done already 😂
This is why people say American's school system are lower than the other countries.
😔😔😔😔😔😕😕😟😟
😂😂😂😂
The white man's science is an opinion. Pseudoscientific research!!!
Here come the religions who try to prove this, only difference is they do it without evidence
@archie baldwin coming from the number one fucktard! Did you even watch video to know what I was getting at?
But we are not allowed to talk about differences in intelligence or aggressiveness through evolution.
+Walter Black Amen brother!
+Walter Black because of political correctness.... and the dominant social group in the US happens to be in the median scale.. so why bother talking about it if you are not the top.. am i right?
There isn't much difference, race is not a deciding factor for a persons intelligence.
+Walter Black Because your assertions have not been verified by scientific evidence and the studies that have been done do not validate you. The kind of people who use to tout this garbage about the intelligence of the blacks used it to justify slavery of the blacks, now they just do it to denigrate them as it validates their bigoted preconceptions. Racist clowns own this trope, your spin shows who you are.
GreaterThanGodLike race certainly isn't but the work ethic between ethnic groups plays a big factor in calculating once intelligence since.. the majority of "IQ" tests are an amalgamation of accumulated knowledge and exposure to more problem solving, thus you can indirectly conclude that certain races have more advantage.
As an aboriginal, I can confirm, milk fucks us UP.
Oh cool My dude
Aww. At least you save up on the milk budget
well, you're not wrong
Kara P what kind of milk you are drinking?
the best kind
centrelink does as well
I stopped listening the second you said: The protein Lactose!
Lactose is a protein. Are you educated?
@@MrAmhara no I can't even read!
MrAmhara bruh did you skip 7 th grade biology class
@@Lana-hz7tl lol
@@MrAmhara not the smartest lad are you?
In short,
Europeans and Asians evolved. Differentely due to different environmental conditions,simple.
Jaspreet Singh no one can’t just simply “evolve” because of the environment. You jackass.
Zoda Ken WRONG. Only identical twins share the same genotype. Please learn what you are talking about and stop wasting everyone's time.
Aaron Gordon if you're denying that certain groups evolved different characteristics over time, you're just denying evolution. Which makes you no better than a creationist. Throughout human history we had isolating barriers which kept the different groups more or less separated. As a result we now exhibit certain physical differences due to different biological histories.
Since when was the definition of evolution a difference in the genotype only.
Google: the process by which different kinds of living organism are believed to have developed from earlier forms during the history of the earth.
@Zoda Ken
Urine ideeot
A better explanation for the mutation of lactose tolerance, which probably required significant environmental pressure, was the ability to process lactose during famines. This would explain the rather rapid pace in the diffusion of the mutation.
Remember that Europe is very cold and dark during the winter. Milk is a good source of nutrition and vitamins during winter when there's a lack of sunlight and plants can't grow.
@@Dushmann_ east Asia is also very cold during winter
@@Vampybattie North America too. Yet most North American natives are lactose intolerant AND have dark skin.
Asians drink more milk than Europeans in general, that study has always been stupid.
@@VampybattieAsia didn't have many aurochs like Europe.
It is not about Europeans and Asians. It is about groups such as Aryan: Afghan, Indian, Caucasian, Slav, Germanics, Latins; Semites: Arabs, Ethiopians, Jews, Maltese, Somalis; Turkic: Kazakh, Turks, Uyghurs, Turkmen, Uzbeks; Uralic: Magyars, Estonians, Finns; No one should base it on modern culture separating Africans, Asians, Europeans, Amerindians...
Sir George Severn
From the way I understand it, we have a couple of main categories; such as Caucasians, Africans etc; with sub-categories beneath those.
And it is valid to refer to people both as their respective main or sub category.
*****
Those minor differences are actually quite significant, and should not be underestimated.
All it takes is a small change for you to potentially be born with brain damage or some other debilitating disease.
***** "Both are actually pretty stupid if you step back and look at it objectively"
"the point I'm really trying to drive home is that we shouldn't treat people differently based on minute differences like skull shape."
That's as subjective as you can get, so don't talk about seeing things objectively when the first thing you do is to insert your feelings, emotions and moral into a subject. What we get from your comment is: "For me, those differences are insignificant, because we shouldn't threat people differently, and you're stupid (you said, it look at it)"
I was only arguing about the way you dealt with the issue.
Anyway, you should not ask me that when 0.01% of anything had been significant, because the answer is yes, in many things, and no, in many other things. And when you see that the difference with a chimp (according to some research less to others) is 1% and with a Denisovan is much less, then...
But, I'm sure that if neanderthals and other human species were alive today (or if they were resurrected somehow) many "anthropology and sociology" students would be saying the same thing. Because how much difference is difference enough to accept that there are differences?
I don't claim to know for sure about this, but for sure, it isn't professional this PC way of dealing with this subjects. It isn't objective/scientific at all.
*****
Look, I followed this thing since the 80's. Not academically, just reading scientific stuff I stumbled with this, again and again. And read many times (since then) about how scientists refused to even talk about race for fear of being called racist or of some outraged clown try to destroy his career just because not liking the stuff. And I still reading about that today. And you know since when things are like this? since the late 40's, because of nazis, offended people "banned race". Suddenly someone/some people decided that race means another thing and it's bad. And therefore we are not separated by races anymore. Or ethnics (depending how PC is the one who opine). It's been like that since then (and a 40's decision doesn't look lie "modern science"...). Then someone came with the absolute batshit crazy stuff of "social constructions". And now with more precise studies and deeper knowledge they are leaning towards race again, that's the last (sorry I can't find now the publications, are not easy to find but I read 3 from last year and 2 from this one) "trend", and that's modern science... But anyway there is still debate among scientists about this subject so, no one can claim that "modern science" is in his/her opinion's side. When there's concesus then yes. And the great problem with PC people is that they are so prone to silence opposing or different ideas...
Searching I just found this, it seems to be interesting kenanmalik.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/why-both-sides-are-wrong-in-the-race-debate/
Sorry for my english, I hope it wasn't too difficult to read.
hyenas can run more than 20 miles without slowing its pace
+Эдуард Вятчанин watty ye chatting about ya moon man?? xD
+Эдуард Вятчанин What use would a hyena have to run for literally over 20 miles straight without slowing down. i bet they are capable but seriously running that long requires so much energy that for anything but a human who can have access to plenty of food it would be inefficient for any other animal and they simple wouldn't waste that much energy for no reason or even if it was for food. walking/trotting for over 20 miles? yea many animals do that. running? no.
Brave Cat if u pay attention to your biology class at school, u would know that hyenas' top speed is not as impressive as other big cats' like cheetahs and lions. instead of sprinting to chase down their prey, hyenas run a marathon to exhaust their prey, which often lasts for more than 20 miles. just so you know
+Эдуард Вятчанин You are correct (said a biology major and teacher). Moreover, humans are the best runners on the entire planet for the same reason. You mentioned cheetahs, did you know when cheetahs reach a certain body temperature, they just stop moving? At all. You can kick a lion in the chin, in a hot noon in the Savannah, and the lion will not budge. Many animals can run faster than humans, but we run more, thanks to the absurd amount of sudoriparous glands. One human have more capability of homeostasis (maintain the same amount of temperature, for example) than an entire herd of horses. We can chase anything, that's what put us in the apex of the food chain, we were born to run.
Marc Abelha is it just me or i thought some guys at nat geo busted the myth about cheetah overheating? though i cant really remember the details, i can recall that one of the dudes say that cheetahs' body temperature only rises after a succesful hunt, not during the sprint
In eastern europe we are evolving into having no hangover from vodka
Nature is beautiful
And de-evolving into fascist again. Must we re-start anew again?
Unprofessional .
Just a dude reading somebody's website
This is youtube... everybody is a dr smh
But he has a decent mic
Pretty sure he's reading off of a script he put together from research.
👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌
90 percent of igbos and yorubas cant digest milk? lol oh scientists and their way of humor...
cece shitery lol am Igbo and I spit out my milk as soon as I heard that
lol
But it's true for me
TheRichzombie No it's not true
lmao, most people you know can't drink milk?
the better question is why are Africans so different from everyone else.
+Seta-San which ones??? there is more genetic variety in the african continent between groups than when you compare africans to everyone else! Africans are so different from each other.
I guess because there are many different climates(people in africa are very diverse) in Africa and they were already adapted well enough to survive in there climates
+Seta-San NO, just the opposite.
+Seta-San Actually Eurasians have more in common with Africans than Africans do with each other.
do you listen to yourself? how fucking vague is that. clearly not all urasians can possibly have more in common with all Africans when they, according to you, have less in common with each other... If you're talking about the split between north African(mediterrian) Africans to sub-Saharan Africans I can understand....
I have never believed the out of Africa theory. We all evolved seperately. Asians, Africans and Europeans did not come from the same place. Finding artifacts is harder in Europe and Asia because of the seasonal changes which cause a lot of errosion. The artifacts are easier to preserve in dry places and Europe is smaler, so ciries were build and exoanded upon cities.Europeans and Asians have developped so many different tools, Innovations, architekture, food.. .So different from the central Africa humans. We do not even digest the same. Its rediculous to think we all came from one ancestor.
It’s impossible for us to have all evolved separately because populations evolve together. If we didn’t come from the same place we wouldn’t be the same species or able to breed. It’s the same concept as having family, you can’t have biological family without a shared ancestor.
Africans have also developed many different things including food and architecture. Comparing everyone’s dna we find that all humans are 99.9% identical.
I agree with you me and my friends all of us never believed that none sens Africa theory
@@TmanRock9 we share 98% DNA with primates as well, this only proves we had a common ancestor at some point. I am talking about the evolution of the human species and cultures. Just because we found bones in Africa it means nothing. Because tausends of years cause a lot of change. Dog breeds can be mixed as well, humans bred them in different parts of the world and they all evolved seperately, with different traits, characters and so on. They did not all evolved from the same wolf, but from the wolf as a species, but the wolf was not native to only one area, not was there one wolf family.
We all came from the homo sapiens ancestor but, the homo sapiens did not live only in Africa. He lived in Asia, Europe and so on. Those grops evolved seperately and according to the environment they chose.
@@andreabrava6899 yeas and if we share a common ancestor then that means we must all share an origin point. Modern humans are 99.9% identical meaning all humanities last common ancestor was in the last couple hundred thousand years or so tops, and it can be traced back into Africa.
Finding the oldest Homo sapiens remains in Africa exclusively means a lot. Well sure once humans migrated out of Africa they evolved down separate paths, but we are all still the same species the out of Africa theory simply claims that humans originated in Africa and later left not that there wasn’t any evolution that occurred after divergence.
All dogs do share a common ancestor mean the same individual ancestor.
At one point I time yes Homo sapiens only lived in Africa. Homo sapiens have been in africa for at least 230,000 years before anyone was in Eurasia or the Americas. They only evolved separately after they split from the original population in Africa.
@@jane4670doesn’t matter we’re all still related
you talk to your viewers like they are 4 year olds
Don't know if you've noticed, but catering to idiots is kinda what you have to do... especially on the Internet. You did read the comments section didn't you?
It sounds more like he's reading excerpts from a Wiki page on evolution.
Um, have you read the comments sections on RUclips videos? If anything he talks up to his viewers.
he has too.. so religious nutbags can understand lol
And that's great. English isn't my first language, so I could understand him very well without getting distracted.
I thought this video was about why Europeans and Asians evolved differently. This video is about all of humanity
Aaron Godley Yeah, I was like hmm.. I got something else outta that
Aaron Godley I was like you guys for a second then I realized that Europeans and Asians didn't evolve from each other. The title is asking why Europeans and Asians evolved from Africans in different ways to adapt to their new climates, of course he didn't speak as much to the Asian adaptations.
Odin029 I don't think they evolved from Africans as African features are highly dominant. In order for a population to remain Non African, you need a larger Non African population to digest the genetic input from Africa. Hence, the selective breeding between the Africans and Non Africans. The conclusion is there always was a sizable non African population in Asia. This theory is full of holes and what they have traced is simply the African slave trade route. The European slavers exported tribes of African slaves all over Asia. Even then the Asian population has always maintained the selective breeding with Africans to preserve their Non African Appearance. The two Asian races - Indo-Europeans and Sino have different but parallel evolutionary path to their African cousins. All three evolve from the same ancestors at some distant point in time.
Samuel Jones
I think all of these changes happened well before the concept of slavery existed. Europeans didn't really start dealing in African slaves until the 16th century ad. I'm not sure how many African Slaves were sent to Asia by the Europeans because in their Asian colonies they tended to use indigenous people for labor.
Odin029 Nope. The African features are too dominant. There is no way pure Africans can produce an Asian. In order for Asians to make Asians in Asia, there had to be a very large Asian population to digest the little African input. Asians are also known to breed selectively with Africans because of their highly dominant African features and that's what keeps Asian population free of African features. This is a major sexual orientation that helped Asians keep themselves Non African. Even in Egypt where the Asians pushed the Africans towards the South, there was selective breeding till date in order to keep their Asian Features.
The little DNA that you find outside of Africa doesn't prove that Africans Migrated to Asia or America. Its just what was left of the Slave trade. Before Europeans there were Arab Slave Traders. Negros in India were first brought by the Mughals. The slave trade was so bad that Entire tribes were processed and sent to plantations all over the world. You have been tracing these "ancient" genes and nothing else.
With these comments you can tell how many don't read more then one book.
*than
Brain moves to fast to keep up with typing.
too*
*
You may call me that, unfortunately the sisterhood no longer exists.
"the ones that could adapted and survive and the ones who couldn't died"
Lactose is a sugar, not a protein.
lactase is the protein. enzyme that crushes sugars
No lactose is a sugar composed of galactose and glucose actually you'll find!
You'll probably be thinking of Lactase that is an enzyme that breaks down Lactose, actually the two proteins in milk are Whey and Casein
but you need this protein to break down lactose
Scrolled to the comments to post this, someone already had. Thumbs up.
you used an african american in the thumbnail to represent europeans.
why
Vahqlos I think that was an artists impression of Akhenaton, the Egyptian pharoah. I guess that's why he looks African American!
Pharaohs was black yo!
does it matter
+Vahqlos, to get people like you worked up over nothing. Gives them a chuckle.
Probably for "diversity".
Get ready for racial slurs and hatred in the comments.
+SoundOfLegend he really should have disabled the comments for this vidio
+The Bunny Suit Killer there's a difference between taking away people's right to hate on a national scale and refusing to provide a platform to hate on a RUclips vidio scale. Just face it, having one on such an inflammatory subject as, Anything to do with race, only attracts people like you.
+The Bunny Suit Killer lol, nice witt, cheaper than a tooth pick, but it make me laugh
+The Bunny Suit Killer traitor? what a sad person you are . what world do you live in . look at yourself before you make yourself look like a fool
lol XD
STOP! just watch something else, this video isn't worth your time trust me.
More detail please lol
^^What the above commenter said. Explain WHY, otherwise.. i’ll just see for myself. Because I think for myself.
Ok thanks
Thanks lol
Why?
They didn't move from the land bridge into the United States . . . they moved into North America.
They did come from parts in Alaska, so yes the United States.
There was no USA back then. And it was also Russian territory before American. Plus the land bridge would have included parts of Canada. So .... North America would be much more accurate.
Besides, Alaska was sold from Russian to the United States not so long ago....
Semantics
Pedro Jose Gonzalez Ramirez 150 years ago
He tried so hard not to make this sound racist XD
no he didnt, your just a fucking moron with no social skills
U stupid
a shame. the reactive stupid people who scream racism are the problem. they keep discussion of an actual thing taboo, subjecting everyone to the consequences of ignorance of true understanding and discussion of race.
No. He is just not racist.
Where the hell did you see racism?
Comment section is more fun
Nice
That theory has been shelved. Lucy the fossil has been superseded by older fossils found in Europe. That is why the whole world except for black African's have the same mydricondial DNA so he is spouting rubbish.
Genetic bottlenecks in multiple places affected inbreeding & selected features. Duh
This is like watching a high school student presenting a poorly researched essay that they didn't bother to attempt to memorize.
mint83
Truth. I instantly came to the comment section 20 seconds into this PowerPoint presentation to see what was up haha
I instantly came down here after I saw him pause and stare at his computer while clicking to the next page of his notes. This video is so poorly made no pictures or anything just some guy talking oddly.
It's like even he is not sure of what he is saying and just relying on the laptop. Ugh so cringey when he makes eye contact to the screen of the computer.
At over half a million subscribers, he should hire an animator, and rehearse his lines.
I don't know if I should agree because I get why but also this comment is pretty rude for no reason so idk
Northern Europeans are generally taller than southern Europeans because in a cold climate, both males and females reach puberty later so since they have not reach puberty, their bones have not closed up and their bones keep growing longer so they end up being taller on average. Southern Europeans who live in a warmer climate reach puberty earlier so their bones stop growing earlier therefore, they end up being shorter. This is why someone from Greece or southern Italy is usually shorter than someone from Sweden.
Honey Lambb How do you account for the people of Rwanda who are among the tallest in the world?
Slavery.
Selective breeding over the tallest, strongest males with the tallest strongest females.
Kind of like Horse-breeding.
It sounds and is terrible, but that's the explanation why there are such huge Africans when their area is more suitable for more average sizes.
Though the OP should correct it to extreme temperatures.
And some Nilotic tribes of the South Sudan are the tallest human species with an average male height 1.90m (6'3") and female average height of 1.80m (5'11"). You know what? The temperature there is very horrible.
Deserts have extreme cold during the night, though - in addition to extreme heat during the day.
I think it's more that extreme temperatures create taller humans, and warm, moderate temperatures don't put that pressure on people.
Unhealthy or shorter or weaker humans can live in moderate temperatures with plentiful food, but in extreme climates only the strong survive.
Atreiyu unfortunately this's not true for the region with these tribes. They live in an area with highest temperature of 36•C and average of 25•C and lowest of 16•C approximately. The weather is rather conducive instead of harsh. And that region is not part of the Sudan that borders the desert ( Sudan borders the desert in the northern part of the country). Actually all those conditions you mentioned were defied and inconsistent with the nature of these people. If it's science, then scientists have to make a better theory, this one is faulty and flawed. You can google the details I mentioned above.
Dear science plus, lactose is a sugar, not a protein
Sri Lata Nankissoon I know rightt
Sri Lata Nankissoon I just got though taking biology
dear science plus the figure 100 percent of native americans cannot process mile is wrong. the figure is closer to 75%
Has -ose ending.
Is sugar
Everything checks out.
-How many animals can run for 20 miles or more straight?
Wolfs: you mean a warm-up run?
Very true. Mind you the Kalahari bushman can run down a deer on a long run.
Human and a donkey.
Humans are the longest ranged land animal on the planet...there is evidence of humans following injured game for 80 miles over 2 days. This proves persistence hunting is not only a human trait but the ideal hunting scenario. No land animal on the planet can out walk a human...no matter how fast....humans will catch up.
sled dogs: what was that ?
@@thenoticerofthe13 they are dogs that pull sleds through the snow....but if they went 20 miles they'd probably collapse and die from exhaustion.
The Fuck is wrong in this comment section?
Believe me, I've seen worse. The Race & IQ crowd seem quite sparse here, probably because it's a science channel.
Fuck you
+MrDerhanswurst What's wrong is that there are RUclipsrs in it. Sometimes I think the most misbegotten humans come here, and maybe to 4chan, although there's some crossover.
No! This cannot be true! All people are exactly the same, in every way, and have exactly the same potential, in every way! The only difference is culture!#socialjustice
/sarcasm
i just dont understand how someone can think with an average functioning mind of any race thinks that one race is better then the other when their videos literally prove that we are all the same and idiots like you still doubt and wanna bring up iq scores
I didn't bring up IQ scores. And, I didn't compare races.
I was mocking the idea that the only differences between individuals are cultural.
How else can I help you today?
He's right, the PC crowd refuses to believe there are more than cultural differences between us
TheEqualizer2U like what..... we all came from africans and changed skin color and adapted to be immune to certain diseases that other races werent because of where they live and things they discovered. You are dumb if you think that 1 race is better then the other.
+CURRYDABEST SHOOTAH
Why do you assume I mean better when in fact all I said was we are different?
One correction. Lactose is a sugar not a protein. Lactose intolerance is not due to a protein like the allergy to peanuts. Instead, those who are lactose intolerant can't digest lactose. Thus the lactose sugar passes to the large intestine where it becomes food for bacteria that give off gas that causes bloating, pain and flatulence.
I was just thinking that. Glad someone mentioned it.
Thank you for pointing that out! Just one error of many, :-/ many in this vid...
Lactose intolerance is a conspiracy created by the government to make people fart more, thereby releasing more methane, which poison our minds and allows them to take over the world and spread atheism, thus polluting our wholesome and intellectual Christian minds! Learn more at #LactoseFartConspiracy
Lactose intolerance IS due to a protein. Lactose is a sugar that is broken down to glucose and galactose by the enzyme Lactase in the small intestine. People with Lactose intolerance do not produce the enzyme Lactase. And ezymes are PROTEIN complexes.
Hillary Briss The issue is that D"News" confuses Casein phosphoproteins with Lactose disaccharides.
People also often confuse lactose with _lactase_ ...the latter is indeed an enzyme, but the former is still a sugar.
Helpful?
Why Europeans And Asians Evolved So Differently FROM AFRICANS!
Some of your facts arent supported and are bs
they're not facts because they can't be supported because as he said, it's not like we had cameras to film it all, it's all educated speculations based on hypothesies from fossils that we find, so none of this is 100% accurate and never will be.
None are facts, all are just best guess really. Unless we can go back and verify.
+chuckchizzle No, there are actual ways of determining this. Genetics is one way of proving a lot of the hypothesized history of man kind. Natural selection often leaves evidence within the DNA, such as with human chromosome 2.
In the science category, this guy takes the prize for the worst. When I'm on auto play, his videos get selected. I'd never go to them voluntarily.
This, however, shows it doesn't take much to be a youtube success. Maybe you should try.
owenivor - I hope you recognize that is a *cartoon* of him.
Congratulations on making a living reading out wikipedia information out on youtube.
Why do we know more about dinosaurs than ourselves
FAT JAXSON we don’t. You may, but we absolutely know more about humans than dinosaurs.
FAT JAXSON Lol
coz your mumma is one huggeee bitch
Klaus Rasch thotasaurus sex 😆
Dinosaurs are fake. That's why. That's why we know more about "space" too. Sorry if you didn't know.
What the heck is this dude going on about? I am Igbo and I have never met an Igbo who could not digest milk.
Do you use the bathroom after consuming milk? That’s a sign of lactose intolerance. Also having softer stools/diarrhea is another sign of lactose intolerance. Overall most people can drink milk, but majority aren’t able to digest it very well.
In other words, science _doesn't_ say there's no such thing as race.
we have 1 race homo sapiens with some having adoptations from thousands of generations because of the enviroment they lived in... being it skin color certain food adaptations disease fighting adoptations ect ect..
so in simple terms. Yes dogs are all dogs but there are different breeds ?
It does say we are very uniform genetically with the difference not being relevant enough to constitute a taxonomic division, which is what a race would be.
Rorikon Kuro Race is defined as a taxonomic division? I don't think so.
the term "race" is not really scientific, I think species and subspecies is what you would say. In english however "race" is still used to refer to people with a shared appearance and culture. That is weird however.
The reason we are better hunters than animals is because we are fast runners and have tools even though we don't have claws and sharp tooth. Ha ha!
Animals everywhere would be offended... if they had the internet. LOL
We are animals, and we are not fast runners at all. We are really good resistance runners.
Donax, dear, I'm sorry you misunderstood. I was quoting the idiot and laughing at his nonsense, not agreeing with him.
Take care. Have a good weekend ahead.
Linda Lee fast my ass
Are you illiterate?
I quoted that numb skull in the first paragraph.
next time put quotations?
My ex husband never evolved.
Well you married him.
Individuals don't evolve, populations do, your comment doesn't make any sense.
You should have picked me instead.
That explains why your kids are animals.
Lo Basque he did when he left you
I don't think evolution is entirely true. There is something else going on here. Your features and skin color are mostly, I'd even say, 100% genetic. Just because you move to a different place, you will not become light-skinned. Whites, Blacks and Asians are perhaps different sub-species of humans. However we all work the same internally but that's a different story. Blacks have been living in the United states for over 200 years and have spawned several tens of generations, yet they still look black. So this theory of you start evolving based on your climate may not be true. I know people say evolution takes geologic time scales like 100,000 years but what evolution suggests is that if you took a huge black population out of Africa and put them in North America without any further mixing with other races and come back 100,000 years later, they will no longer be black? Sorry, I don't buy that theory.
this video make me think are humans program to migrate like I we program to set our goal to Mars and far off planet
migration is due to the increasing population
Everything is programmed to survive.
+James Grant but humans are not free of those risks just because they move to another planet. I think earth's atmosphere is quite beneficial to us when it comes to protecting us from minor asteroid shit storms.
+JonnyC 289 you realize that our planet is "dying" because of our pollution right... it will kill us all if we keep going like this. even if we stop, eventually our sun will die out and also kill us all
+john cenicola us all as in our descendants ^
Lactose is a carbohydrate (sugar) not a protein
Asjen Mensink correct! Any word ending with ""ose"" is a sweet tasting carbohydrate that our liver turns into "Glucose" which is a fuel for our bodies.
No all foods are made out of sugar even protein . Protein is from plants it just have a smaller sugar that give it a name call protein .
@Enter the future. Not really, unless you are really trying say all foods are made out of carbon dioxide, water and sometimes fixed nitrogen! Because plants fix CO2 and water to make produce sugars that they metabolize into a variety of intermediate metabolites, some incorporating fixed nitrogen (like ammonia and nitrates). Using these to make amino acids, that are used to make proteins. But if you mean proteins are carbohydrates,. no they are not. They are polymers of amino acids and a different class of biomolecules.
I have a hunch he was trying to say lactase. Which is the protein that breaks down lactose into glucose and galactose.
@Joihn Ecker mostly right! -ose designates a carbohydrate. Many of the small ones that consist of just a couple of subunits are sweet to varying degrees. But not all of them. And some, like cellulose are huge polymers that are not sweet at all. -ase designates an enzyme, usually acting on a substrate that precedes the -ase.
As an aside. A number of dipeptides are extremely sweet. Aspartame is one of them. Curiously, many dextro-amino acids are also very sweet. Unlike the levo amino acids we use in proteins. I've tasted dextro-tryptohan, which is very sweet and tastes pretty good. Unlike levo-tryptohan which is tastes a bit like mothballs smell.
Seems you didn't mention native Australians. They must've been part of the very earliest of human migration out of Africa. Even before the ones you mentioned in asia with the Laos skull. It's believed they've been on the continent around 60k years
What did the librarian say to the student?
Read more
Imperial Ugh.... god dammit lol
Haha.. gold
lol. awesome
God damn it
For some reason it made me cringe so hard.
I had to stop less than a minute in when you said "evolution forces adaptation". Please research what those terms mean before you make videos like this.
Thomas Baker Yeah it's the other way around!
He must have an IQ of 70.
Agreed. Power of necessity dictates
Thomas Baker the fact that your arguing about it kind of shows each of your lack of understanding. Individual mutation does force adaptation. The process of evolution also forces adaptation. The process of adaptation favors those capable of successfully adapting, and Vice Versa.
Quite your bitching.
it’s just a grammatical mistake. It’s not a big deal.
I think of the "Siberian Fox Experiment", where a fur farm wanted to domesticate foxes to be able to handle them easier. They bred the most tame ones. What happened was astounding! The fox's DNA changed as they got tamer and tamer to having spotted coats, curly tails, floppier ears and started to bark and play like dogs! Not only would this explain how changes in wolves transformed them into dogs as they became more domesticated, but could explain the many changes to the human genome. Look it up...fascinating study!
This is called domestication syndrome and humans do in fact have it. Compared to our ancestors our mouths are smaller, we’ve lost certain muscles, our heads are rounder…many other features as well. We did in fact domesticate ourselves
Not that fascinating... we genetically engineered foxes to be more like dogs.....
Makes sense. Similar animal. We're forcing the breeding and mating to favor traits which are favorable to us rather than suited to their natural wild environment so their survival depends on carrying traits favored by humans.
Makes perfect sense and actually acts as proof of evolution if anything. It's only fascinating if you just learned the theory of evolution two days ago.
@@laurajaneluvsbeauty9596 well yeah. We're not feral.
Think about beauty standards. Who are the most successful in terms of sex? Those we consider attractive.
Thus those traits are passed on more often. Short women are preffered so those traits survive. Women stay short. Men get taller because tall men are preferred. Darker skin is more successful. Curvy bodies for women are more successful while muscular and Lean body types for men are more successful. Smaller noses are more successful. Large buttocks are proving to be a sticking trend that may translate into traits passed on just like bigger breasts (men developed a love for bigger breasts because it suggests on a primitive level that the women is more fertile and can sufficiently feed lots of children. This isnt 10p% true but men keep picking these traits so after so many generations you started seeing more and more women with bigger breasts and more men who are attracted to them to the point it's most men now)
Evolution is all about sex. Nature doesent magically know what features you need to survive. It's the animals who pick features in their mates that end up helping them and their children survive. And these traits that are successful keep getting picked and eventually reinforced.
So humans have the potential to guide our evolution In such a way we actually regress. That is highly possible.
We can breed ourselves into being a race of short big booty morons with big chests and low brows and thick thighs just because we keep reinforcing beauty standards.
OR we could become a race of ditzy statuesque anorexic models not suited for physical labor and combat nor building and agriculture.
Experts predict the next species Will be highly influenced by technology to the point they'll have an extra eyelid to filter blue lights and hunched backs and cramped hands.
@@juanmccoy3066 obviously i understand how evolution works so idk why you felt the need to type a book.
All of that is just juvenilization.
Why did humans evolve different physical characteristics?
For example, if aliens landed on Earth and saw a Swede and an Australian Aborigine standing together, they would assume they`re a different species.
lactose is a sugar not protein
RoyalFox lol true
RoyalFox Thats why he is so incorrect to blame drinking Milk on our skin colour, its happened over a long time all due to climate, hot climate black skin, cool climate white skin, its part of our DNA & he is talking bs as I passed My BHS on this particular topic!🌎💥
There isn't a place on Earth where most ppl don't drink Milk, we are weaned on it & so is every Mammal esp domestic Cats, but adult Cats shouldn't have Milk as they have problems & can't digest it any better than a Dog, both are meat eaters yet ppl have always assumed Adult Cats drink Milk, they will given the chance as a Dog would & most mammals but how many ppl give Dogs milk with their food? Cats should drink water only with meat not Milk! Man is whatever colour due only to the climate his ancesters lived in up leaving for a different place & climate!💥
.
but milk itself is protein rich. it just so happens that to get all the proteins you gotta drink the milk -fat, protein and lactose included- and whoever didn't have the lactose-tolerant mutation couldn't, then, have all them fats/proteic nutrition that would come along with it.
I am a native american that drinks milk. I am a Mutant.
A lot of your information is simply incorrect and misleading. Many of those races and subspecies of humans that left Africa died out leaving only the Homo Sapiens. The migrating to agriculture does play a role and crossing the land bridge is correct. However since then there has only been about 100,000 years which is certainly not long enough for evolution to take place, human populations haven't been isolated for long enough. The only genetic variation that took place are those that regulate superficial things like hair form and skin color, and those slight variations cannot account for a Difference among humans.(Genetically speaking)
+ZackJay Didn't blue eyes appear in Europe only 10,000 years ago or so? Light skin an adaptation to low sunlight climates? Same for the gene to allow digestion of milk. You are right in saying that evolution is a glacially slow process, though.
Not necessarily an adaptation, like eye color the migration plays a role as selection pressure was not as intense for dark skin due to climate which allowed for the genes to mutate. Eye color is not linked to a single gene its a mixture of different ones. But there is no evidence for evolutionary difference among humans as we share upwards of 85% genetic code
+ZackJay Seeing your intelligent response is refreshing here.
Great response.
Couldn't have said it better!
+ZackJay
That isn't entirely accurate. In recent years, scientists have begun to realise that genetic adaptations can occur suddenly and in a much shorter time frame than had previously been thought possible. I recently had the pleasure of seeing a talk given by Dr Robert Winston on genetics, that discussed this and highlighted just how little we really know or understand genetic evolution. Small mutations can occur within just a few generations and yet, in terms of our dna, even the smallest mutations can have a profound affect on our bodies and their functions.
There was a study conducted on the ability of different racial groups to cope best with famine conditions. Not surprisingly, groups of people that have lived in historically marginal regions (where food scarcity has always been an ever present danger) were genetically pre-disposed to cope with famine, nutrition shortage and long term survival under those conditions, remote locations in asia, africa and the like. They had expected this. What did surprise them was that in the far north of sweden it was found that the more isolated communites there also had a pre-disposition on par with the afore-mentioned areas. Which also makes sense, cold isolated regions where seasonal conditions could render easy access to food a distant dream. What surprised them was that these communites hadn't been present as long as would have been anticipated for such adaptation to occur, especially when their more southernly swedish neighbours further south in the region had coping capacity on par with other europeans (which was much lower, harder time coping with nutrition shortage). The study went some way to show that, given right conditions, genetic mutation and adaptation could take place in a much shorter time frame than science had previously believed was required. The same can be said for numerous other communities around the world.
Evolution isn't just the great big leaps between sub-species. Small changes and drift are taking place all the time. We've only just started looking at genes in any meaningful way, we should be careful in rushing to conclusions because we can be sure to have 95% of what we think we know today, proven wrong tmorrow.
All races came from black people. I know that's hard for some of u to except, but its true.....
@Charles No your wrong, u obviously haven't done your research, or u wouldn't say stupid shit like that...
Hold on...I'm a Nigerian from those tribes you mentioned and literally I haven't met or seen any person with lactose intolerance before,It does not even rank as one of the major health issue.I take what most people will consider too much Milk and Milo chocolate drink every morning without having a single stomach ache talkless of Intolerance, tbh I don't think those researchers did a good job at all.
thay dont have any food allergies either thats an American thing. thay pretty much eat anything thay can find that dont eat them first.
The food allergy thing is a really interesting fact aswell, something happened in the 80-90's that made it the problem it is today. Aus scientist trying to pin it down for ages. Probly pesticides but who knows
blakagant
Could be the preservatives too.
What?..My name is Elizabeth Collins because my ancestors converted to Christianity...I've never been to the US. before in my life,I'm purely African with absolutely no breakage in my family tree...Please next time don't just assume things like that.
+elizabeth collins I'm nigerian and I have a really bad lactose intolerance. So do a bunch of other Africans
Why am I finding a lot of White and Black supremacist BS in the comment section?Oh yeah,because it's RUclips.
+HCN 27.0253g/mol It is BS the main Fact is we are all Human
So racism is based on who ate more cereal.
Arcaneus Umbra
I’ve gave up halfway through the video so this comment section is quite a roller coaster.
Race exists, they just want us to feel like it does not.
No, Africans are a different species from Europeans and Asians
The problem with 'race exists' is it leads to racism and nonsense like 'Africans are a different species'.
We are all Africans. We all evolved in Africa around 200,000 years ago from a number of around 10,500. Which means, we are all related. We are not only all one species, but in many ways, we are all one 'race' (in fact, many scientists don't even use the term 'race' because it's so useless). Then we went to India and China and became Germanic people later in the North/West, and others, and later became Angles-Saxons, Celts, Romans, etc. in Great Britain (skipped a lot of history, just focusing on England/America now).
So, everybody in England and America is really just a Germanic person or Dutch/Roman/Greek in some cases, in a way. The first people to be called 'English' were the Angles, a Germanic tribe from the East. And almost all Americans are English or Germanic (Dutch, etc.). Unless they are Mexican, Spanish, African, Native, etc. so, there's not even such a thing as a 'white American' or 'an English person'. Most of us are just from Germanic Europe. For sure, there's no such thing as a 'white American' because 'American' means everybody from the Americas, not the US, and you're only about 300 years old, so, you're simply not old enough to be a 'white American', you're just a Dutch or English person. Your mother and father could be American, but that doesn't really make you American in any meaningful way.
This explains why it's one of the few places where if you're born there, it makes you 'American' or is able to. If you're born on French land, that doesn't magically make you French. We only have to go back to your grandparents or great-grandparents and you're not American (and your DNA would show clearly that you're mostly Euporean/British). Thus some have called American nationalism 'hubris at its finest'. It's really hated by everybody other than Americans. I suppose it's like being born in the North of England vs the South of England. It doesn't make much sense to try and act as if you're a completely different Englishman having been born in one or the other. There's no real difference other than dialect. But, I suppose, the Americans have this system because otherwise, they would need to call themselves 'US Europeans' or 'British-Germanic Americans', some people have suggested the term 'USer' instead of 'American', but my problem isn't with the term 'American' itself, more the fact they think it means something and my problem with American nationalism. In fact, it's so strange it creates more an American supremacy, 'rawr, my parents were born here, therefore, I'm a real American [white] and better than you'. No wonder America pretty much invented white supremacy.
And all modern humans (every human alive today and there are no other humanoids left, either) is part of the same species. A species is defined as that which you can create offspring with. So, the Neanderthals were, in fact, humans. And even you didn't know that Africans are the same species, they have to be, anyway, because Africans can create offspring with both Asians and Europeans (any other human, for that matter).
Thank you for not doing your research Warhammer Workshop because Asians and Europeans originate in Asia, not Africa as previously believed. There have been studies on this and you can easily find them unless you're scared of becoming "racist" which by the way is biological in humans. Humans should and are racist by default.
Title: "Why Europeans And Asians Evolved So Differently".
Thumbnail: Same old.. same old..
*6:56 lactose is a sugar not a protein
Great video though
+Chris Bieker One of the problems with ad libbing and not reading a script is that you make a few mistakes.
+Chris Bieker no its not - its highly incorrect
+shgfe3ay Yeah because evolution isn't real and the Earth is only 4000 years old, right?
No 6000 year...lets get it rightb