Well said. Like wtf even is this anymore? I think just keep reusing tons of content that is even slightly related. Why are we talking about American bombers 5 different times? Yeah, we heard you that one Russian bomber is called the carrier killer. Either it's reused or they have a 12 year old writing the script.
Actually this video is highly informative regarding Russian tactical nukes. In one wore, formidable. An old senior military analyst once told me, “War is to a be avoided at all cost.” Nuclear war has no winners, only losers.
As long as they track it early on with radar , it is plausible. I believe Ukraine has already taken out hypersonic missles with relatively more primitive / convention air to air weapons.
The Russians aren't going to nuke Ukraine. That's just silly. There are no tactical requirements in Ukraine that can't be dealt with using conventional weapons. Brussels, London, and Washington DC however should be wary.
Russia has updated its military doctrine specifically to untie its hands and be ready to launch a nuclear strike when needed. What seems impossible to you personally may be perfectly possible for the Russian military. You think differently. Tactical nuclear warheads are just the beginning and may be a viable option for the Russian military.
Worried about Russia targeting there Nations with Nukes? That would be suicide & I know Putin doesn't want Ukraine so bad he will risk his entire country. These threats are attempts to scare the cowards into trying to pull support for Ukraine. Ukraines hit the interior of Russia for 2 years so to claim hitting Kursk is a redline is nonsense.
Unfortunately even a tactical nuke can spark a chain of events that lead to the end of the world. The book called "Nuclear War" by Annie Jacobsen is incredible, highly recommend giving it a read or listen
Congratulations Aitelly for releasing another video hope you get an award category for these kinds of videos that your developing. Keep up the good work.
In 1994 Ukraine had 2,500 tactical nuclear warheads, largest stock pile in Europe. Also dozens of SS-19 and SS-24 intercontinental nuclear ballistic missiles. Under Budapest Memorandum all Ukraine nuclear stock pile was withdrawn to Russia in exchange for recognizing of 1991 borders of Ukraine. US and UK were a guarantor sides in a Memorandum. Result is known today.
In the 80's there was a military war game conducted using the concept of "tactical nukes" for the first time in combat. The conclusion was there is no such thing as a limited nuclear strike because it will always lead to global thermal nuclear war. Which, with the modern warheads of today, means total planet annihilation.
Unfortunately, the idiots cheering these wars on don't realise, these wars are why their countries infrastructure is junk and the roads are crap. People need to be aware that the US Military Industry Complex is a business that needs perpetual war to survive, and this is why the US creates war for profit.
This Is A Very Good Video.. However? Nuclear Weapons (DO NOT HIT THE GROUND).. They Are Exploded Above Ground In The Atmosphere.. So That They Can Get A MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE RANGE Once Exploded.. If They Were To Hit The Ground? A Large Amount Of The Explosive Energy Would Be Directed Into The Ground.. Thereby Losing The Weapons MAXIMUM EFFECT... They Are Usually Exploded About ONE MILE Above Ground Level... 😮😮😮 NOW YOU KNOW.. KNOWLEDGE IS POWER... 😎😎😎
It depends on the application. There are nuclear "bunker buster" warheads that penetrate the ground before detonating. Nuclear gravity bombs may be set to detonate at or near ground level if your goal is to create fallout. Your blanket statement is incorrect.
Thanks. That was actually pretty accurate. You missed the mark there near the end. Starting up the nuclear escalation ladder, nuclear strikes at sea are a pretty good idea because you cant blow a crater in the water, hence its a good demonstration place to start a nuclear war-a "natural firebreak" to show intention without full nuclear commitment. . But where you missed the mark was was talking about radioactive "dust"(fallout ) from a sea strike. There is little dust at sea to become radioactive. The definitive work on the subject is "On Thermonuclear War" by Herman Kahn. . (AKA DR Strangelove) Its old but very informative .
@@disorganizedorgBuffered by lots of water, which when converted to steam, then rises high in a cloud, comes down back into the ocean. A la Bikini Atoll.
@@rhensontollhouse ...and does the salt in the water goes when it's converted to steam? I don't know what isotopes might result from such intense radiation to Chlorine or Sodium, but I doubt they're benign. Other elements are present in lesser amounts, including those that make up plankton and other sea life. While it was a surface blast on a coral atoll, Castle Bravo managed to sicken the crew of Lucky Dragon 80 miles away. The total volume of coral vaporized was comparatively small and consisted largely of lighter elements such as Calcium. I feel fairly confident that the the steel and other heavier elements contained in an aircraft carrier and its support vessels would be considerably worse with respect to radioactive fallout. I'm not sure, but I also seem to recall that a lot of fish had to be discarded as contaminated.
Bro why show Crimea and donbas under Ukraine, they don't have any control over that, it's russian territory now, if you don't want to show it, just specify it as disputed territory. That map will confuse people. Ukraine will lose, that is reality, there is no turning back from that.
This video completely misses the point. The ATACMs are US military provided, US intelligence targeted, and US satellite guided. So to any rational observer, it is the United States (a nuclear power) directly attacking Russia (another nuclear power), not Ukraine. Given the ATACMs are nuclear capable, there is no way for Russia to know if they are carrying a conventional payload or a nuclear sneak attack launched from "Ukraine", therefore they said they will respond by targeting the truly responsible parties (NATO bases, US, and UK), not the idiot who pushed the button in Ukraine. The US is the one instigating, which is even more absurd when you consider no one in America knows who in the US government is in control (dementia Biden or McConnell, i don't think so)
Tactical nukes serve as a warning to a more serious strategic nukes. Nothing much can be achieved tactically unless the enemy is concentrated in one place.
Judging by the graph , ATACAMS is able to reach almost Veliky Novgorod, which is almost 1000 km or 600 miles (although its radius is 200 miles). What a joke
We may laugh at this video now, but not in a few weeks when most of us are dying of starvation when the nuclear fallout destroys global agricultural production
Now I will explain to you some other limitations of the new strategic bombers in relation to the old models. There is such a 1.2 megaton B83 bomb. She has a Kevlar parachute that quickly brakes the bomb. And there is a new B2 stealth bomber with a delicate sensitive fuselage coating for invisibility, a coating that should not be spoiled and must be protected. The repair will be awesome in price. And the plane should fly a good distance away from the explosion. I think you've seen the connection. Old planes are not so gentle, and they can also be fast. You can ignore the burnt fuselage and make the bomb more powerful. And B2 is forced to make a limit for itaelf.
If the radius of Iskander missiles is 300 miles, then why is it able to hit targets only to a depth of 100 to 200 miles? By the way, I am sure that Iskander is capable of launching missiles at a greater distance
Вот, смотрите ребята. Так наша Родина диктует свою неприклонную волю всему остальному миру - Может жахнем? - Конечно жахнем, и не раз. Весь мир в труху!
showing the whole launcher as the missile made me chuckle. its like in movies when they show the whole cartridge of ammunition coming out of a barrel as the bullet.
Bro forgot to calcuate AD response time after they detect a hypersonic flying low... they have less than 60 seconds trying to lock and launch anti missile which is impossible
0:43 - yes but actually no; Kihindzal is air launched version of Iskander and both have been demonstrated as able to be intercepted with success rate > 50% which, factoring in reliability ( 90-80% ) means that for single nuclear strike this isn't feasible. Same is case for Kalibr and othe rcruise missiles. In order to ensure hit Russia would have to use something more difficult to intercept (Rhubiezh or downright strategic missile), possibly along diversionary attack. Launch platform is not as relevant as missile. Tu-22M looks nice with 6 missiles, but Khindzal has never been demonstrated on Tu-22M and AS-6 could be carried max 3. 8:15 - Ukraine doesn't have nuclear aircraft carriers, Phalanx have been largely replaced by RAM or SeaRAM and usually there's escort with SM-2 misisles.
You are kidding. Cause Houthi already attacked Abraham's Aircraft and damaged and yet you are telling me they can shoot down a hypersonic missile with a gulting gun!😂
So, Ukraine has nuclear plants and people who have lots of expertise in nuclear weapons. Questions? 1- Does Ukraine currently have the ability to produce nuclear weapons? 2- How long would it take for Ukraine to build them?
People do not realize that Russia is only 55 Miles away from the US. A US Conflict with Russia will not allow any response time to react to a Nuclear Strike. The looses between the US and Russia will be Astronomical. Don't be fooled thinking that Russia is a country located far away, when in reality Russia is only 55 miles away from the US.
To all nuclear fear people. I survived 4 nuclear blasts living 80 miles from epicenter during Soviet times. These blasts were several megatons which is much powerful than Hiroshima. My mom survived 215 nuclear blasts. And father even more. If Russia ever use nuclear weapon china will not be happy because their enemies such as Japan, South Korea, Taiwan will want to develop nuclear weapons for protection and china can forget about its dominance in their region. As well as India will not be happy. Right now entire Russian economy depends on these two countries. They keep fueling military economy of Russia and Russia understands it. Their country will collapse without china and India. If this is not enough I highly doubt that in corrupt country such as Russia these nuclear weapons even work. All money is stolen. If one nuclear bomb will detonate the USA will destroy Russia alone or with Britain and other powerful allies.
My mom survived 215,000 nuke blasts,and my father drink the uranium everyday.If russia use nuke,there will be a retaliation n escalation from west,and lastly all sides will burn to hell. Ur assumption is based on hollywood.
This has been discussed already in Russian state media. They're going to use hydrogen /fusion nukes which yield very little radiation in Ukraine. (If they're launching against a faraway target like the US, they're going to use dirty nukes with maximum radiation.)
bro is compromising quality over quantity 😢😮
@@MKT1302 their channel is known for being fast at spreading fake news
I find this quality content nothing his fake in this videos its all tactical information you cant fake that
@@Reaper0101x im not talking about this single video.
@@tasyo what u talking about then
@@AlejandroGallardo-h1v read my first comment
Who’s here after the nukes dropped 😂
Here after dropping morning poops😌
Obviously not you
All Of Russia and Putin needs to become muslim, Putin needs to announce on TV the change of Russia's religion to Islam
I think us Aussies will be ok
When did they drop nukes 😮?
Bro made a video before attack
During and after !
Hypersonic Mode Been Activated 😮
Completely click bait video. Another nothing specific in the video as per the title. You become more and more ridiculous which the latest videos.
This is a typical the western propaganda...
All misleading and blatantly false info as well 🤦
I unsubscribed.
Well said. Like wtf even is this anymore? I think just keep reusing tons of content that is even slightly related. Why are we talking about American bombers 5 different times? Yeah, we heard you that one Russian bomber is called the carrier killer. Either it's reused or they have a 12 year old writing the script.
Actually this video is highly informative regarding Russian tactical nukes. In one wore, formidable. An old senior military analyst once told me, “War is to a be avoided at all cost.” Nuclear war has no winners, only losers.
Shooting down hypersonic missiles with Sea Sparrow missiles, really? Or shooting down those same missiles with a Gatling gun, no less? 🤔
I had the same question.
DF Hypersonic Missiles Family 🇨🇳Please hold our DUMPLINGs 👀
As long as they track it early on with radar , it is plausible. I believe Ukraine has already taken out hypersonic missles with relatively more primitive / convention air to air weapons.
@@DJBnw Lmao keep believing in fairy tales, i heard a babushka also shot one down with a jar of pickles
@@haythemsandel8303 hahaha. Good one.
Hasn't even been 24 hours since last video.. You guys are working at hypersonic speed at this point 😅
Yeah....they are very serious about that !!
Views gets them the moolah
@@JojoJoget Not from me.
Or they were propaganda.
They have to before nuclear winter comes
The Russians aren't going to nuke Ukraine. That's just silly. There are no tactical requirements in Ukraine that can't be dealt with using conventional weapons. Brussels, London, and Washington DC however should be wary.
Yep, they are just talking trash. I've been sitting at the tv waiting so long my ass is starting to hurt.
Fear mongering is what the west does, they cant even tell us what victory for Ukraine will look like 😂😂
Russia has updated its military doctrine specifically to untie its hands and be ready to launch a nuclear strike when needed. What seems impossible to you personally may be perfectly possible for the Russian military. You think differently. Tactical nuclear warheads are just the beginning and may be a viable option for the Russian military.
Russians should first try getting their nukes off the ground without them detonating immediately.
Worried about Russia targeting there Nations with Nukes? That would be suicide & I know Putin doesn't want Ukraine so bad he will risk his entire country. These threats are attempts to scare the cowards into trying to pull support for Ukraine. Ukraines hit the interior of Russia for 2 years so to claim hitting Kursk is a redline is nonsense.
Nukes and Potato chips are very similar, can't have just one and they all leave a mess.
Yummy😂🤪🤡
lol
TSMC 🇹🇼 Hold Our Chips 😎
PUTIN MAY BE CRAZY BUT HE DEFINITELY IS NOT STUPID 😂😂😂
YES HE IS
All Of Russia and Putin needs to become muslim, Putin needs to announce on TV the change of Russia's religion to Islam
You got that right. The man was a soviet spy😂 therere is a reason he's always in the news
This is arguable question if he is crazy. The world majority supports him after all.
Unfortunately even a tactical nuke can spark a chain of events that lead to the end of the world. The book called "Nuclear War" by Annie Jacobsen is incredible, highly recommend giving it a read or listen
@@wfd1234567 That’s if we are still around to do so
ATACMS are short range not long range
Didn't creepy Joe trigger the attack?
He did
But they will still say Russia is to blame!!!
No, Putin did, because he's scared of NATO, and Ukraine becoming an energy exporter.
@@AUDI15849 No, Putin did, because he's scared NATO and Ukraine becoming an energy exporter.
@@псориаз-н8о Russia is to blame, they invaded
Congratulations Aitelly for releasing another video hope you get an award category for these kinds of videos that your developing. Keep up the good work.
500 kg warhead at mach 12 can rip a carrier into two pieces due to its kinetic energy, without even exploding.
Yup
🤓☝ This is equivalent to the energy released by about 1 ton of TNT, just from the impact alone, before considering any explosives in the warhead.
Finally we're here discussing how nukes will be used and after sometime we would be discussing how that strike had happened 🗿💀
In 1994 Ukraine had 2,500 tactical nuclear warheads, largest stock pile in Europe. Also dozens of SS-19 and SS-24 intercontinental nuclear ballistic missiles. Under Budapest Memorandum all Ukraine nuclear stock pile was withdrawn to Russia in exchange for recognizing of 1991 borders of Ukraine. US and UK were a guarantor sides in a Memorandum. Result is known today.
Very informative channel! Thank you for your effort in giving concise explanation, subbed.
In the 80's there was a military war game conducted using the concept of "tactical nukes" for the first time in combat. The conclusion was there is no such thing as a limited nuclear strike because it will always lead to global thermal nuclear war. Which, with the modern warheads of today, means total planet annihilation.
Well, no need to worry on something which has not happened.
Go back to sleep
The wars are just expanding and expanding
Due to corrupt leftist policies
Most wars since Vietnam were started by democrat presidents, dems love war.
@@Elwin-w3v 😂😂😂🤪🤡
Where are they expanding?
Unfortunately, the idiots cheering these wars on don't realise, these wars are why their countries infrastructure is junk and the roads are crap. People need to be aware that the US Military Industry Complex is a business that needs perpetual war to survive, and this is why the US creates war for profit.
This man is faster than future😂
😂😂yes man like make countries powerful
He from pentagon
Mankind can make all this killing apparatus but traffic lights still just dont work efficiently
This Is A Very Good Video.. However? Nuclear Weapons (DO NOT HIT THE GROUND).. They Are Exploded Above Ground In The Atmosphere.. So That They Can Get A MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE RANGE Once Exploded.. If They Were To Hit The Ground? A Large Amount Of The Explosive Energy Would Be Directed Into The Ground.. Thereby Losing The Weapons MAXIMUM EFFECT... They Are Usually Exploded About ONE MILE Above Ground Level... 😮😮😮 NOW YOU KNOW.. KNOWLEDGE IS POWER... 😎😎😎
It depends on the application. There are nuclear "bunker buster" warheads that penetrate the ground before detonating. Nuclear gravity bombs may be set to detonate at or near ground level if your goal is to create fallout. Your blanket statement is incorrect.
Better get some then, as you know not what you blather about. Amazing.
Respect AiTelly. Your videos are informative.
This dunce still thinks КРЫМ is український 😂😂😂
This is a brilliant, hardworking channel.
it is AI ...
How tf you guys edit and upload so fast?? You guys are wizards!
Reusing conent over and over
AI ?
Everyone has a plan until they get hit with a Nuclear Weapon ~ Mike Tyson
When did he said, Mike Tyson, I never heard this before now 😂😂
@Hidfhjccbxcbhc Look it up 😂👍
~ unless the weapon is too old you don't know if it still works properly ~ Jake Paul
@Jacob-xm9hf 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂 lmfao!!
@@newphaze-gz2kf Everybody has a plan until they get hit" is a quote by Mike Tyson
You missed the point that Hypersonic missiles cant be intercepted lol
false high powered lasers can intercept hypersonic missiles
I always wanted to see how tactical nukes work.
DON'T WORRY YOU'LL GET UR CHANCE SOON DUMMY
@@JohnSmith-w5x6b yo chill down Lockheed Martin
Same
@@prisonmike1063hahahaha
great video, not quite accurate about the fallout part at the end, but generally awesome video.
Carriers are never alone
@@Grant918Tulsa strategic missiles are not launched alone either
imagine the Russian economy after a nuclear strike ...no existent
The russian economy went up after starting the war, more reparations probably gonna boost it even more
Same with the rest of the world
Thank you.
Love your work. Blender is hard
Thanks. That was actually pretty accurate.
You missed the mark there near the end.
Starting up the nuclear escalation ladder, nuclear strikes at sea are a pretty good idea because you cant blow a crater in the water, hence its a good demonstration place to start a nuclear war-a "natural firebreak" to show intention without full nuclear commitment. .
But where you missed the mark was was talking about radioactive "dust"(fallout ) from a sea strike. There is little dust at sea to become radioactive.
The definitive work on the subject is "On Thermonuclear War" by Herman Kahn. . (AKA DR Strangelove) Its old but very informative .
Sea water contains a lot of minerals.
@@disorganizedorgBuffered by lots of water, which when converted to steam, then rises high in a cloud, comes down back into the ocean. A la Bikini Atoll.
@@rhensontollhouse ...and does the salt in the water goes when it's converted to steam? I don't know what isotopes might result from such intense radiation to Chlorine or Sodium, but I doubt they're benign. Other elements are present in lesser amounts, including those that make up plankton and other sea life.
While it was a surface blast on a coral atoll, Castle Bravo managed to sicken the crew of Lucky Dragon 80 miles away. The total volume of coral vaporized was comparatively small and consisted largely of lighter elements such as Calcium. I feel fairly confident that the the steel and other heavier elements contained in an aircraft carrier and its support vessels would be considerably worse with respect to radioactive fallout. I'm not sure, but I also seem to recall that a lot of fish had to be discarded as contaminated.
Bro why show Crimea and donbas under Ukraine, they don't have any control over that, it's russian territory now, if you don't want to show it, just specify it as disputed territory. That map will confuse people. Ukraine will lose, that is reality, there is no turning back from that.
Это наш Крым и Донбасс! Украина умирать эту войну
Russian is going to lose if they start ww3
The Bro even suggested strong Ukrainian invasion in to Russia for the nukes usage. He still has the 2022 Ukraine will win hype in him. 😂
@@Tatarin-d5n odessa will be russia... ukraine can have west of ukraine after dniper..
Sure Ivan gere is your 20 rubels
Just hopefully there's never a nuclear explosion at any war...
So why it was made? It purpose to win the war sooner or later it will be used
This video completely misses the point. The ATACMs are US military provided, US intelligence targeted, and US satellite guided. So to any rational observer, it is the United States (a nuclear power) directly attacking Russia (another nuclear power), not Ukraine. Given the ATACMs are nuclear capable, there is no way for Russia to know if they are carrying a conventional payload or a nuclear sneak attack launched from "Ukraine", therefore they said they will respond by targeting the truly responsible parties (NATO bases, US, and UK), not the idiot who pushed the button in Ukraine. The US is the one instigating, which is even more absurd when you consider no one in America knows who in the US government is in control (dementia Biden or McConnell, i don't think so)
So, you are saying that nuclear Kinzhal missile can damage our aircraft carrier? 👀 Joe, is it you?
Tnx for the video. Although i find it distracting the large aitelly logo on screen. Hope u can make it smaller. Tnx and more power 👍
~ Zelensky Needs some "Lesson" from Putin ~ Uraa ~
Can you do a video on the Russian RS 28 ...That one is spooky..Scares me.
AiTelly , please do video about Russian Torpedo - Poseidon.
AiTelly assumes US just sends a carrier all by itself without a strike force with no jets onboard
Looks like Ukraine is about to find out.
Can't wait to see
Noooo how dare u say that all russia say is bluf😭😭😭
@@joshimuddin5454 invade ukraine also bluff right
ah yes after 3 years of red lines crossed, this one is the "special one", cope troll.
@@CosmicWanderer20 Гавнюк
0:08 LOL, withing 24h the range of the ATACMS increased from 186 mi to 500 mi.
What are you guys smoking?
spice
They might be talking about the PRsM, which is the next upgraded version of GMLR and ATACMS....which will have much more ramge
IT is generated by AI, what are you smoking more like.
3:36 - As I know It keeps 12 cruise missiles but not 16 hypersonic missiles
The animation is becoming greater
damn we talking bout nukes now brothers and sisters. its on the horizon brace yourselves.
Damn youre fast
Airbursts do not produce significant fallout
Stupid how everybody pushing to eskalation instead of seeking a peaceful solution, Nutz!
Tactical nukes serve as a warning to a more serious strategic nukes. Nothing much can be achieved tactically unless the enemy is concentrated in one place.
They ask bro for permission before any attack… cause he needs to make the videos right after 😂
For those who think russia will not use nukes. WHY DID THEY MADE THE LARGEST NUCLEAR ARSENAL IN THE WORLD THEN?
super explaination
This will make War news really interesting to watch
Judging by the graph , ATACAMS is able to reach almost Veliky Novgorod, which is almost 1000 km or 600 miles (although its radius is 200 miles). What a joke
We may laugh at this video now, but not in a few weeks when most of us are dying of starvation when the nuclear fallout destroys global agricultural production
Informative, insightful, accurate and quite engaging. Keep up the top work guys.
😂🤪🤡
Now I will explain to you some other limitations of the new strategic bombers in relation to the old models. There is such a 1.2 megaton B83 bomb. She has a Kevlar parachute that quickly brakes the bomb. And there is a new B2 stealth bomber with a delicate sensitive fuselage coating for invisibility, a coating that should not be spoiled and must be protected. The repair will be awesome in price. And the plane should fly a good distance away from the explosion. I think you've seen the connection. Old planes are not so gentle, and they can also be fast. You can ignore the burnt fuselage and make the bomb more powerful. And B2 is forced to make a limit for itaelf.
If the radius of Iskander missiles is 300 miles, then why is it able to hit targets only to a depth of 100 to 200 miles? By the way, I am sure that Iskander is capable of launching missiles at a greater distance
Splendid animation
Вот, смотрите ребята. Так наша Родина диктует свою неприклонную волю всему остальному миру
- Может жахнем?
- Конечно жахнем, и не раз. Весь мир в труху!
showing the whole launcher as the missile made me chuckle. its like in movies when they show the whole cartridge of ammunition coming out of a barrel as the bullet.
I love your work
Stage 1, call Xi and ask just how far that special friendship goes.
You guys work faster than the CIA lol.
No Pain , No Gain
Painful lessons must be taught to troublemakers
Bro forgot to calcuate AD response time after they detect a hypersonic flying low... they have less than 60 seconds trying to lock and launch anti missile which is impossible
0:43 - yes but actually no; Kihindzal is air launched version of Iskander and both have been demonstrated as able to be intercepted with success rate > 50% which, factoring in reliability ( 90-80% ) means that for single nuclear strike this isn't feasible. Same is case for Kalibr and othe rcruise missiles. In order to ensure hit Russia would have to use something more difficult to intercept (Rhubiezh or downright strategic missile), possibly along diversionary attack. Launch platform is not as relevant as missile. Tu-22M looks nice with 6 missiles, but Khindzal has never been demonstrated on Tu-22M and AS-6 could be carried max 3. 8:15 - Ukraine doesn't have nuclear aircraft carriers, Phalanx have been largely replaced by RAM or SeaRAM and usually there's escort with SM-2 misisles.
I think those bombers will be very hard to get close to the carrier , they will lunch every plane they got and intercept it . Good video tho
I hadn't read the whole title on notification and with the last 2 videos this channel made too, i had a MASSIVE heart attack for like 3 secs.
Me too 😂
You are kidding.
Cause Houthi already attacked Abraham's Aircraft and damaged and yet you are telling me they can shoot down a hypersonic missile with a gulting gun!😂
It won't be used in Ukraine, western europe yes
We have lost the fear of nuclear bombs. Look at how we easily talk about them all over media as it its suppose to be entertaining.
No strategy ...Just terror in this video of what may happen....And to whom...Peace
💥🅰️❗🇹🇪🇱🇱🇾💥
👍🙌💪🇫🇦 🇳 🇿💥
0:36 lmfaoo, this is beyond fantasy
Is it possible you could do a Doomsday clock video? Please
this is the 560th wonder weapon. what happened to the other 559?
🤣... in a Hypothetical scenario, Putin will Adjust his Red Lines....
No need nuks for disable career fleet because hautis done two times at red see without nuks I mean USS isohowre and abrahamlinkon
woah!! i thought the unthinkable has happened from the thumbnail . 😅😅😅
So, Ukraine has nuclear plants and people who have lots of expertise in nuclear weapons.
Questions?
1- Does Ukraine currently have the ability to produce nuclear weapons?
2- How long would it take for Ukraine to build them?
Using mini size as little boy & fatboy (in Japan) ?
But what is tactical (clean) nukes are used?? That's the biggest questing..
Im proud to say that i was sub this channel under 500 subs ...
Congrats for 1mil
So, what happened with the carrier when Huthis attacked it with not even hypersonic missile a few days ago? 👀
Please don't spread nuclear dust, but real winner on the battlefield is determined by latest tech. ✌
Kinzal can reach 2000km not 200km 😂😂
This was a video mostly about a fighter jet… not tactical nukes
here comes the russian keyboard brigade
Everybody is tired of that argument for people criticizing the main stream stupidity!... 😂
People do not realize that Russia is only 55 Miles away from the US. A US Conflict with Russia will not allow any response time to react to a Nuclear Strike. The looses between the US and Russia will be Astronomical. Don't be fooled thinking that Russia is a country located far away, when in reality Russia is only 55 miles away from the US.
🙄 To a sparsely populated corner of Alaska. 🙄
He failed to mention the interceptor aircrafts on the carrier.
To all nuclear fear people. I survived 4 nuclear blasts living 80 miles from epicenter during Soviet times. These blasts were several megatons which is much powerful than Hiroshima. My mom survived 215 nuclear blasts. And father even more. If Russia ever use nuclear weapon china will not be happy because their enemies such as Japan, South Korea, Taiwan will want to develop nuclear weapons for protection and china can forget about its dominance in their region. As well as India will not be happy. Right now entire Russian economy depends on these two countries. They keep fueling military economy of Russia and Russia understands it. Their country will collapse without china and India. If this is not enough I highly doubt that in corrupt country such as Russia these nuclear weapons even work. All money is stolen. If one nuclear bomb will detonate the USA will destroy Russia alone or with Britain and other powerful allies.
My mom survived 215,000 nuke blasts,and my father drink the uranium everyday.If russia use nuke,there will be a retaliation n escalation from west,and lastly all sides will burn to hell. Ur assumption is based on hollywood.
What about radiaton if russians attack with nuclear bombs?
According to Islamic Eschatology - The Romans (Europeans will divide into two and fight each other like never before).
@@fishing-gardening-travelling thats ok we dont claim russians as europeans ..
@@fishing-gardening-travelling they will also fight over a mountain of gold in Iraq very soon
This has been discussed already in Russian state media. They're going to use hydrogen /fusion nukes which yield very little radiation in Ukraine. (If they're launching against a faraway target like the US, they're going to use dirty nukes with maximum radiation.)
@xmatobujnakx Russians are the original orthodox Christians. The western Europe has lost their religion. They will fight each other.
Crazy animation even put your logo on the tupolev !!!!
Ukraine is too close for nukes. The radiation fallout could reach Moscow.
Not tactical.
@@prosimulate Why ?
Too bad they didn't let Russia join NATO when they asked
@ModMax69 well they didn't met the criteria for join, they had territories disputes.
@@feibdegrassi1646 wish that could have been worked out
🤡🤪😂
@@feibdegrassi1646 example please. Cause they didn't.
@@feibdegrassi1646 And Criteria is To Say - USA 🇺🇸 IS MY DADDY....
AND I AM VESSEL STATE OF USA..
Orang eropa berlomba lomba bermigrasi ke asia saat serangan nuklir di beritahu😅