What a brave, thoughtful and incredibly sharp person. I wish we could hear more of her voice. Imagine if she was in power. What a better world we would live in.
I'm curious. They use the pronouns she, and also says they are trans. Does that mean they are female? Born male? Or male born female. I'm just curious because either can't find the answer anywhere
Me as well actually. It just seems like he continually was nice to her and kept their opposing viewpoints separate from the friendship. But now she has not. When his conservative views went political she couldn't help herself
She didn't say he hid opposing views from her, quite to the contrary - that's the point. You make it sound like he was dishonestly humouring her throughout their years-long friendship.maybe you should listen again
I am so impressed by Sofia Nelson: her ability to speak from a place that is profoundly vulnerable yet lucid and grounded. I wish we all had her clarity and compassion.
Sofia you were brave to go public with your experience with JD Vance. It’s true that his public opinions do embolden people to attack trans, blacks and single women.
seriously a profound interview - in a just world, this interview would be enough to discount JD as a politician altogether, demonstrating the focus of his interest entirely.
That Vance's response was written in the third person, whether by himself or by a staffer on his behalf, is so deeply sad and quite telling about where he is now. About where he has gone. About the seeming loss of his humanity.
Exactly. She wasnt even worth a personal reply from him. Just a boilerplate statement from a staffer. Its a very pointed lack of familiarity. J.D effectively pulling a Trump by saying without saying "i dont know you, your not worth my time."
Powerful. Thanks for this. It took great courage for Sofia to share their story knowing fully what would -- and has followed. (reading some of the comments makes that plainly clear.) You can choose to align yourself w/ Vance or not -- but seeing him in the fullness of what he is (or isn't) should only inform that choice. To say it was a betrayal to disclose the nature of him belies the fact that this is a man who has put his whole life on display in every possible way. As such, accountability to truth was/is inevitable. We are all complex people, no doubt --- full of paradoxes and contradictions informed by different lived experiences that move us either closer to... or further away... from our true nature of goodness. I hope Vance someday resolves what has moved him away from that -- for his, and for potentially all of our sakes. Much love and strength to Sofia.
So sad and terrifying. I really wish this episode, and Sophia’s story, were getting a lot more attention. These are things We The People need to know about our leaders. And the irony of Vance calling Harris a chameleon…I know that “projection” is a bit overused right now, but I can’t think of a better word.
@@itsallminor6133if she does, I’d applaud her. She seems like an intelligent and sharp person with good ethics. Edited for she/her pronouns as it seems that’s what Sophia uses.
I really appreciate Sophia sharing this insight. It is interesting how loyalty is a concept that is individually interpreted. Vance indirectly suggests that Sophia sharing these conversations was a betrayal. I would argue that the betrayal stems from him. It is not just a matter of disagreement. The quest for power at the expense of others especially using hate that Vance and the Republican party pushes is the true betrayal.
Your uncharitable interpretation of everyone else's motivations is the real hatred. And Sophia has proved herself as an untrustworthy person and not a real friend. I would trust her with no personal information. I'm guessing after this, no one else would either.
Precisely. I'm not a fan of Vance as a VP pick, but this public airing of (not-so-)dirty laundry only makes me sympathise with him as a human being. This is not what a true friend does - to quote the bard: "I may not evermore acknowledge thee, but mine is thy good report." It's quite a jump for her to come to the conclusion that he betrayed her in a personal way because of a law specifically addressing minors.
@mikewilliams6025 Frankly, if Vance was my friend, he forfeited my trust when he began to engage in manipulative behaviors that served to justify discrimination, bigotry, or violence against me or other marginalized groups for the sake of his own interests. What kind of friend is that? You speak of charity? Why should I give charity to someone who so effortlessly is willing to compromise his values for political power? That is exactly the type of person I do not want to have power. Charity is rooted in the idea of compassion to alleviate the suffering of others. How again is Vance encompassing kindness and generosity or emphasizing the importance of caring for others? He doesn't.
SAYING you care and SHOWING you care are two very different sentiments. Vance is another lost soul. . . when you’ve bought into power and money above all else you’ve lost your soul . . . here’s hoping Vance finds his again one day.
@@agt1234567890 People can change, sometimes for the worse. Trump has been the same person since he became a career politician. If Vance has completely changed his opinion on someone who hasn't changed for the past decade (Trump), then it's obvious why Nelson reaches the conclusion that Vance is no longer the same person she once knew. To say that Vance is the same person then and now, is not a compliment to Vance.
I'm so sorry that Sofia has had to lose what seemed like a genuine person at time. When you lose a friend to a hateful ideology it can be extremely confusing. I'm glad he's speaking out. It can be extremely intimidating to go against someone who potentially has the power to bring harm to you. I support Sofia for doing this 100%.
@@ribbrascalthe betrayal is kind of true. He did nothing to her. And she says he changed but if you really listen to her she didn't say exactly how. She admits he was conservative, nice to her, sarcastic at Yale. And he doesnt seem to have changed. All she has really verified is he changed his mind on trump which he admitted already. She says "transforming on every conceivable issue". Yet can't specify what. It actually contradicts her own statement. If he was conservative in college he's conservative now. What changed? She contradicts herself
@@itsallminor6133She does say how...1) on specific policy views 2) on how he talks about and treats others. He saw Trump as reprehensible before in how he talked about and treated others, now he casually demonizes and lies about minority people without a thought (Springfield and his doubling down on the demonizing of the immigrant community the clearest example but countless others.) In his friendship with her the shift is also noticeable. In a text to her about a matter obviously personal to her he distinguishes between normal and abnormal people says liberal policies are a threat to normal people, clearly implying who she is he now sees as a threat. This is an astounding 180 for someone who once invited her and her partner to his wedding.
Such a powerful conversation. I admire Sophia's courage in sharing her story and living her authentic life. I could hear the pain in her voice over the loss of her friend. I share her question and frustration with the lack of a clear answer as to; how does her being, impact and make harder, the lives of "normal" people.
This all reminds me of the horrific civil war in 1994 Rwanda where neighbors murdered each other ( Hutu vs Tutsi) - and interestingly enough it was INSTIGATED by the CATHOLIC CHURCH. People who had been neighbors for years. The murdered figures were as high as 1 million people in 3 months!
So...Im going to make a bold prediction, a sad one, but I think it's likely now: JD Vance's marriage will not survive this election. And I say this because...Trump made this ideological switch in his politics and betrayed his own prior political beliefs because he's basically a clinical sociopath...he lacks internal empathy to other "humans," so making that flip-flop (and profiting off of it) was easy to do. JD Vance on the other hand, has some kind of empathy and soul (or had at one time), and the flip-flop he has made is only just going to create a greater and greater cognitive dissonance in his mind and soul, and its going eat him up...until he confronts it. And that is going to exact a serious toll on him and his family the longer it lasts. Thanks Sophia for bringing this to the fore....I really feel for you and your loss of your friend.
I wonder this too. Melania can run and hide (though you can see she's really not happy), but I just don't see that same coldness in Usha when she appears publicly. If I were in her shoes, I'd be thinking hard about whether I was living a life that I could be proud of.
@@vinista256 she can reconcile herself because apparently she has become a part of the power and wealth elite. I find her strange as Indians do not behave that way. With her level of education and marrying a blue eye white boy shows that she has also shifted the focus from being from humble immigrant daughter of Indian descent to the American dream. She has even resigned her job to join her husband on his campaign. And that is to show you how certain she thinks she would be the wife of the next VP of the US. May be she has even measured the draperies for her new house already. She has no soul just like her husband. Birds of a feather flock together. She will and it seems has "sold her birthright."
There's a deep hypocrisy here, in that we as citizens of a democracy need to take responsibility for the influences we exert over our politicians. If, as a culture, we pressure politicians to develop, and then reward huge personalities, then I don't think it's fair to portray JD Vance's ideological changes as a complete selling out, or even dishonest. The fact that this election is largely about vibes and personalities instead of substantive policies (on both sides) is to me the greatest evidence that we, as a country, are facilitating these sorts of changes. On a more practical level, I find it childish to expect a person to hold the same ideas forever, especially taking in the context of people seeking public office.
As I listen to her, I thought about every municipal Black politician (mayors and council members) I ever met, along with Trump and Harris. The key and common denominator is alienation as the other among them all. Vance as the chubby, rural, white kid wanted to be accepted by the elites who looked down on him, so he did what Gramsci and Kruse predicted and said what would happen to people like him. He joined his oppressor(at least as he saw it).
Thank you Sophia, JD can say what he wants about this, but to stay silent is to be complicit in any harm caused by MAGA extremism. Mary Trump talks of having regrets for not coming out sooner to tell the world about her uncle. I'm sure there were also descendants of 1933 Germans who wished more people had not just gone with the flow.
My guess is he was a nice guy and conservative then. And still is now. But when she pulled the "friend card" texting him over the children surgery she broke that. He kept the political views they had separate from their friendship. Perhaps she tried to pull that card to sway him. She already knew he was conservative at Yale.
Vance believes that parents should be given the right to vote on behalf of their offspring, and he's extremely patriarchal so we have to assume he means that fathers should be given a vote on behalf of their child. He's also said that women should be forced to carry a pregnancy due to rape to term, so someone really should ask him if he thinks that rapists should be given a vote on behalf of the children he helped them father.
@@NoWay1969 Property-holding men were given the right to vote with the clear understanding that they would vote the interests of their household. Gentlemen who were abused or cuckolded by their wives were punished and publicly shamed-instead of their wives-not in order to”blame the victim” but because they were held responsible for all of the men and women and children they supported, even when those men, women and children attacked them. Even today, women spend 85% of consumer purchases, yet husbands are co-responsible for these purchases, whether they are aware of them or not. Voting is a responsibility that is still today mostly performed by the more responsible: older folks more than younger, employed more than unemployed. Research shows that unemployment permanently scars the exercise of voting, even after people return to responsibility and work. If it makes you less unhappy, please know that rapists don’t end up being dependable voters. Voting is indeed an issue that is experienced very differently after you’re a parent, and after military service. Both are deeply sacrificial acts. And JD is right: things like parenthood change us in a way we can barely fathom. And parenthood could have been one of the ways that Sophia and JD grew apart.
Sounds a lot like Tulsi Gabbard too! How do you flip a switch like that, run as a democrat and 4 years later endorse Trump?! Political chameleons are the worst
@@CChristi5 wrong it’s called being a opportunist. She had literally no support or platform being democrat so she swings dramatically to the right. We can talk all about how she shut up Kamala during the debate, but her support as a democrat never went above 2%. She endorsed Biden in 2020 and his policies, now Trump’s 4 years later who couldn’t be further apart.
Hey, it happens. In 2016, I was for Bernie, now Trump. Situations change. Society changes. Personal beliefs change. This is not unique to Vance or Gabbard.
I applaud the courage it took for Sofia to share the particulars of her friendship with JD Vance. Could it be possible JD is just talking the talk/walking the walk to get "into the club", but when push comes to shove, he will do the RIGHT THING?? Clearly, the friendship he had with Sofia and their many exchanges remains in the landscape of his mind and could hold sway.
it seems that an exploration of his new inner agenda, would be a good conversation to have with Vance.... it's wonderful to hear the compassion and thoughtfulness in Sofia's voice....it is so hard to understand the Trump cult.... hopefully America's democratic structure can weather the storm 💙💙💙🕊🪺✔✍🏽🇺🇸😎
I also lost friends over politics. We didn’t have an outright argument but they just ghosted me for supporting Bernie Sanders. At this point I don’t see much in common with them anymore and wouldn’t want to be friends again.
Vance is emblematic of people who are influenced by the internet. Russell Brand is the same.They are both intelligent but easily led. They also seek power. A dangerous combination.
I don't agree with sharing private conversations, especially only segments. They only way I can justify it is that he discussed her in his memoir, making her a character to present himself as receptive to diverse viewpoints. Still it feels wrong.
So much here can be explained as, pandering. Being disingenuous in word and action is never attractive. Changing position, through new information and reasoning, is a growth supporting process. If turning one’s back, for political reasonings, on a friend/cohort is another matter. Parsing the bs/truth, for the righteous, is never ending. Imo, both of the featured characters here have axes to grind and are now playing in the big game. They are both still learning. Being, or representative of way left and way right achieves little in the conversations that have to be had. This is little more than pointing fingers. Our world has way too much of that already in the political arena. I want more from the generation I am so waiting to represent the future.
I have empathy for people who suffer from traumatic experiences as Vance supposedly has. That being said, I do not believe that they have a place in leadership roles over others, especially as high ranking officials in the US government. Vance's decision to be a sell out to himself translates into his ability to be a sell out for the American people. Just as Vance believes that people without children should have less rights than people who do, the same can be said about a person who suffers from mental health issues being permitted to run for or hold any political office. This is a question all Americans should carefully consider, but I wonder if Vance would appreciate such an application?
Interesting and moving interview. I also worry about Vance’s integrity but I don’t think revealing personal correspondence is a wise method for eventually healing the divide or encouraging better communication.
This is not about healing a divide or encouraging a conversation. This is about exposing how much the person who might be second in line to the presedency has sold out to get power. This is to warn the people who will vote about him. This is not about some fluffy undivided world that doesn`t exist. This is about warning people of danger that will come for them in form of extreme and regressive policies promoted by that man second in line if they don`t pay attention.
This is not about healing a divide or encouraging a conversation. This is about exposing how much the person who might be second in line to the presedency has sold out to get power. This is to warn the people who will vote about him.
@@anthill1510reading between the lines. She says he was conservative and sarcastic and nice at Yale. He's still the same. It appears more she became upset when he ran for political office. And by the text message she sent "gender affirming care for children" that's not really a hill you want to die on when pulling the "friend card" knowing they are conservative and you are far left progressive.
@@itsallminor6133 JD Vance advocates for a national abortion ban, the ending of no-fault-divorce, defunding of the public school system, defunding of all kinds of social programs and he is backed up by a detailed plan written down in Project 2025. To me it seems like he pivoted in his believes to gain power, but it`s not really important if he always was like that or if he personally believes in these policies he wants to write into law. The policies itself are the actual problem.
Sofia, you are a champion for sharing your life with us. It's very sad to see someone you were so close with push for such hurtful changes that directly affect you and the community you are fighting for. There can be a place in this world for everyone.
JD states they use "they/them" pronouns, yet NYT's went out of their way to title this interview "SHE used to be friends with JD Vance"....I came here in the middle of listening to the JD Vance interview to try to get some context behind what JD was claiming. I'm starting to think the NYT has one foot in Trump's pocket.
The NYT thinks it helps their argument to portray this person as a woman in this instance. They want to emphasize this is a poor little woman being bullied by big bad man, JD Vance. The pronouns change based on the perceived benefit in different situations.
Yuck, politics aside, sharing personal correspondence without the other person’s permission is just disgusting. Luckily all Sofia’s acquaintances now have fair warning…
It is important before Americans vote to know our possible VP is (as she said) “willing to turn his back on his core values in order to amass money and power.”
With friends like this who needs enemies. Just wants to get in the spotlight since he was selected as Trumps running mate. What kind of friend is this that is so jealous of his success that old emails of their conversation were published. 😑
This person is way too emotional and hurt by someone who changed view for better for the country. It’s not about her only. Not for one person’s view. Can you imagine how Biden felt when he was told he needs to step down when just few days ago all his so called friends telling the world that he is smart and sharp and fine to lead then boom! That hurts!
Feeling mixed about these emails being made public. But I definitely think your expectation of privacy drops when you decide to run for Vice President of the United States. It's part of the deal. Would the same commenters have complained if an old acquaintance of, say, Hillary Clinton had released some of their emails during that campaign? Call me cynical, but I doubt it.
JDV appears to me to be your standard on-the-make, greasy-pole-climbing opportunist who'll say your shit smells of roses if it improves his share price. He is, as we say here in the UK, a member of the Cambridge University Netball Team (better known by its abbreviated name). Oh, and a good actor. As for this smart, eloquent woman losing a "friend", she'll get over it, come to realise he was always on the make, a chameleon, as others here have said. "Brave"? This isn't Iwo Jima.
I’m a lifelong liberal Democrat who walked away from the party in 2017. Not everyone in MAGA is out for political power and opportunism. The hypocrisy of wanting the world to accept your complete change in gender and appearance but not giving the same courtesy to someone who has evolved in their own pursuits and opinions is the reason people are over the Democrats.
@@loganemmert1392 entire thing. Twice. I'm actually beginning to wonder if she like him and he rejected her. "He was so nice" and then he changed. No explanation into what really changed
@orion6372 Freedom to brainwash children and mutilate their bodies? Or the 'freedom' to censor 'freedom of speech'? Or freedom to jail political opponents on bogus charges that'd put even Putin and Xi Jinping to shame
Sofia was right to speak up but wrong to leak messages. And let’s get real - gender affirming care for kids isn’t the hill to die on. Most people don’t agree with it across the political spectrum
I started listening on spotify and wanted to share my frustration, so came here to leave a comment. After a few minutes it became clear what this was, and I stopped listening. It’s an old uni friend of Vance, who had made private correspondence public. Am I the only one who finds that unethical? Shame on you New York Times. I hope that Trump and Vance won’t win the election. But going through private correspondence from like a decade or two earlier, is ridiculous. Maybe it’s because in the US’s news media isn’t unbiased, but this would be looked down on in most of Europe. Bad look for Sofia Nelson and NYT
Breaking that bond of friendship and leaking personal correspondence simply does not sit well with me. You've sacrificed a principle, and I don't think Vance would have betrayed you in such a way. I find it ironic when Sophia says he has a lack of integrity, while not having the integrity of confidentiality.
He broke the bond when he aligned himself with Thiel and Project 2025. He is trying to enact policies to hurt others. Why is he trying to hurt others? That is what this is about.
It's a tough call, but I think it serves the public interest to know about Vance's radically shifting views. If he is elected, Sophia likely views this as a threat to her and other transgender people. I don't think she's wrong about the threat, and I respect the fact that she did not leak this information anonymously.
@@QuietRefl4378what exactly shifted? She says he was conservative and on the opposite end of the political spectrum than she was at Yale. I see no change. . He was nice to her then, probably would still be. I think she did possibly throw a wrench in it texting him over the child surgery bill. He probably thought she crossed a line pulling the "friend card" , I only speculate . If he was conservative at Yale. She was tran progressive at Yale. What changed? Other than he ran for office. The fact he was so nice to her, having completely opposing views makes me actually think JD is probably a really good person.
I agree here. Trust was broken I think. For what purpose? I don't know. If he was conservative at Yale and he's still conservative now I don't see a difference. My only question would be how much of his writing to her was to placate her being nice to a friend to avoid arguments
When he used the term normal, she could have asked more questions about other peoples perspectives context and experiences. Again at the end she asks a question but doesn’t really show real curiosity, depth, or empathy. It’s an empty question and empty assertion. It’s better to emulate critical thinking and ask questions for clarity in a sincere way. It seems bigoted and narrow minded when there are these obvious and glaring signs that this is not a good faith or fair minded inquiry. It may be experienced as cruelty.
I feel immense sympathy for what Sophia has gone through with what clearly was a close friend. But this has also made me more sympathetic to Vance, and I think I like him more now.
A person who would forsake the safety of those he considered friends and sacrifice their human rights in a naked pursuit of power is something that you find endearing? To each their own I guess. I personally find it morally repugnant.
@@craigpoeryour opinion of this woman “using him for fame” seems to disregard a fundamental idea. If your friend commit a high profile crime and got away with it, and you felt it was your duty to notify the police, and then reporters reached out to you. Are you preying on the victims of a crime for fame? JD Vance is on a path to strip this person and other trans people of their identity and access to modern healthcare. Perhaps it is not a 1:1 comparison with my “crime” analogy, but for many people, it is incumbent on them to prevent harm to society when they are able. To say it another way. If you see an impending train wreck, and take action to stop it. You’re not “using the train” as a pathway to fame. In fact, even if no one else in the world knew that you could have stopped the train wreck, most people would live with a heavily guilty conscious if they let countless people suffer when they could have intervened. Sofia is speaking to avert what she believes to be a personal and societal disaster that would lead to the harm of many of her what I suspect is her closest friends. For you to perceive that as “using Vance for fame”…it’s hard to understand. I don’t even have to agree with her positions to understand that her speaking out is a very understandable action.
What's wrong with the changing point of views on politics? As I grow older I turn more conservative. I mean she changed her sex, people change and evolve. Making drama out of nothing. The people who demand tolerance are the least tolerant.
Being tolerant of Vance’s intolerance would not prove noble character. He was clearly ok with allowing people to live their own lives until the temptation of money and power became too irresistible. The difference between how you portray this conversation and someone who is seeking a rational understanding is that one side is taking away rights and the other side is heartfelt about ‘live and let live’. Just so we’re clear, Vance only talks about taking away rights. The fact this conversation makes you uncomfortable enough to try and shut it all down tells me that you know there is truth in what I say and “drama” is your security blanket. Find your bravery, the world doesn’t have to be an ugly place.
JD has adopted a maturity to his views based on life experiences. Is a free and thoughtful person allowed to change there ideologies as life experiences add to insight in being a public servant. Trying to please everyone pleases no one but as a public servant should serve for the betterment of the society, which is up for discussion
You think t’s mature for Vance to say married women should have to stay in abusive relationships and to characterize childless women as unhappy cat ladies? ??
No, he is not. Or at least he acts like he is not. It doesn`t really matter what "his heart" says, it matters what kind of policies he promotes and implements as a politician. The kind of policies he promotes now are clearly extreme and regressive, he is not searching for a balanced worldview any more. It doesn`t matter if he actually is convinced of what he says, it matters what laws and structures he promotes that will influence everybodys life.
This made me realize JD is actually a very good guy. Despite opposing viewpoints politically, ideological, he was still very nice to this person. It's appears to me the person became upset when jd put his personal views into the political machine. My guess is he's the same person that went to yale with her. She said he was a conservative then. I don't see the change. I also suspect some of his response was to placate her, trying to be nice. Other than that she is upset now using a political card to throw a wrench. It's also interesting to hear and understand that JD really does know the progressive left from first hand experience. So he is knowledgeable about the situation and both sides. He just didn't stop being a conservative.
He stoped being conservative when he started seeking political power to take away the rights of people like his former friend. He is extremist, not conservative. Most conservatives want little government interference in people’s lives-live and let live. That’s why many traditional conservatives are now leaving the Republican Party.
My sympathy is for Trump. But actually her private emails have given me a softer, more human, impression of J.D. Vance. So in my particular case her mission to thwart J.D. Vance has had the opposite effect. I simply like J.D. Vance more, after having heard her private conversations. The real problem for herself, is that no friend can ever feel safe with her. Revealing private conversations and emails is a no-go, even if you disagree politically.
How very interesting. Thank You NYT. And thank you, Sophia, for sharing.
What a brave, thoughtful and incredibly sharp person.
I wish we could hear more of her voice.
Imagine if she was in power.
What a better world we would live in.
Proper grammar!
I'm curious. They use the pronouns she, and also says they are trans. Does that mean they are female? Born male? Or male born female. I'm just curious because either can't find the answer anywhere
I am impressed with how well Sophia communicates her experience and feelings. She strikes me as insightful and honest and a good friend.
Me as well actually. It just seems like he continually was nice to her and kept their opposing viewpoints separate from the friendship. But now she has not. When his conservative views went political she couldn't help herself
She didn't say he hid opposing views from her, quite to the contrary - that's the point. You make it sound like he was dishonestly humouring her throughout their years-long friendship.maybe you should listen again
My mother used to say “Never put anything in writing you wouldn’t want to see published on the front page of The NY Times.”
😁👍💙🇺🇲🕊
Am I missing something? Seems like he’s a nice guy.
@@agt1234567890 DUH! I assume you are being sarcastic? If not, you need to learn how JD got from "nice guy" to "spawn of Satan" MAGA Republican.
I am so impressed by Sofia Nelson: her ability to speak from a place that is profoundly vulnerable yet lucid and grounded. I wish we all had her clarity and compassion.
He has done absolutely nothing wrong. His old' friend' was never his friend.
Power is what JD Vance wants at any price!!
You're very brave Sophia!
Isn't them a they/them?
Profound and deeply sad. Thanks for sharing this
Sofia you were brave to go public with your experience with JD Vance. It’s true that his public opinions do embolden people to attack trans, blacks and single women.
Brave? Ok. I mean, the guy's a nasty tool, so calling him out, if you can, must be great fun. This young woman speaks beautifully.
seriously a profound interview - in a just world, this interview would be enough to discount JD as a politician altogether, demonstrating the focus of his interest entirely.
That Vance's response was written in the third person, whether by himself or by a staffer on his behalf, is so deeply sad and quite telling about where he is now. About where he has gone. About the seeming loss of his humanity.
Exactly. She wasnt even worth a personal reply from him. Just a boilerplate statement from a staffer. Its a very pointed lack of familiarity. J.D effectively pulling a Trump by saying without saying "i dont know you, your not worth my time."
He's made her 'the other', pushing her into the dehumanized separate collection of 'not normals'
Powerful. Thanks for this. It took great courage for Sofia to share their story knowing fully what would -- and has followed. (reading some of the comments makes that plainly clear.) You can choose to align yourself w/ Vance or not -- but seeing him in the fullness of what he is (or isn't) should only inform that choice. To say it was a betrayal to disclose the nature of him belies the fact that this is a man who has put his whole life on display in every possible way. As such, accountability to truth was/is inevitable. We are all complex people, no doubt --- full of paradoxes and contradictions informed by different lived experiences that move us either closer to... or further away... from our true nature of goodness. I hope Vance someday resolves what has moved him away from that -- for his, and for potentially all of our sakes. Much love and strength to Sofia.
So sad and terrifying. I really wish this episode, and Sophia’s story, were getting a lot more attention. These are things We The People need to know about our leaders. And the irony of Vance calling Harris a chameleon…I know that “projection” is a bit overused right now, but I can’t think of a better word.
Political ambition is a helluva drug.
Maybe she plans to run for politics
@@itsallminor6133if she does, I’d applaud her. She seems like an intelligent and sharp person with good ethics. Edited for she/her pronouns as it seems that’s what Sophia uses.
I really appreciate Sophia sharing this insight. It is interesting how loyalty is a concept that is individually interpreted. Vance indirectly suggests that Sophia sharing these conversations was a betrayal. I would argue that the betrayal stems from him. It is not just a matter of disagreement. The quest for power at the expense of others especially using hate that Vance and the Republican party pushes is the true betrayal.
Your uncharitable interpretation of everyone else's motivations is the real hatred. And Sophia has proved herself as an untrustworthy person and not a real friend. I would trust her with no personal information. I'm guessing after this, no one else would either.
@@mikewilliams6025 lol Nothing wrong with exposing a hypocrite who has sold himself out in his quest for power.
Precisely. I'm not a fan of Vance as a VP pick, but this public airing of (not-so-)dirty laundry only makes me sympathise with him as a human being. This is not what a true friend does - to quote the bard: "I may not evermore acknowledge thee, but mine is thy good report."
It's quite a jump for her to come to the conclusion that he betrayed her in a personal way because of a law specifically addressing minors.
Bit rich from the side that hate made hatred of white people its moral foundation and operating principle.
/ex-liberal
@mikewilliams6025 Frankly, if Vance was my friend, he forfeited my trust when he began to engage in manipulative behaviors that served to justify discrimination, bigotry, or violence against me or other marginalized groups for the sake of his own interests. What kind of friend is that? You speak of charity? Why should I give charity to someone who so effortlessly is willing to compromise his values for political power? That is exactly the type of person I do not want to have power. Charity is rooted in the idea of compassion to alleviate the suffering of others. How again is Vance encompassing kindness and generosity or emphasizing the importance of caring for others? He doesn't.
SAYING you care and SHOWING you care are two very different sentiments.
Vance is another lost soul. . . when you’ve bought into power and money above all else you’ve lost your soul . . . here’s hoping Vance finds his again one day.
Maybe he’s still the same person he always was and just changed his opinion on one person (trump) and now everyone is losing their minds
@@agt1234567890 People can change, sometimes for the worse. Trump has been the same person since he became a career politician. If Vance has completely changed his opinion on someone who hasn't changed for the past decade (Trump), then it's obvious why Nelson reaches the conclusion that Vance is no longer the same person she once knew. To say that Vance is the same person then and now, is not a compliment to Vance.
Very thoughtful… I have been confused by his behavior and this is an enlightening discussion. Thank you so much.
I'm so sorry that Sofia has had to lose what seemed like a genuine person at time. When you lose a friend to a hateful ideology it can be extremely confusing. I'm glad he's speaking out. It can be extremely intimidating to go against someone who potentially has the power to bring harm to you. I support Sofia for doing this 100%.
It's hard to know who you are when you're a phoney.
Exactly…..very profound statement…one that goes both ways..
A lack of moral courage to not come forward. Such a strong set of words. I hear a friendship that changed and perhaps even hurt. 🤔
Sofia is so brave! Thank you Sofia for helping us to understand JD Vance and putting into words what many of us suspected
Sophia is so thoughtful and kind that her opinion carries weight for me.
She is a disturbed and mutilated woman and a betrayer of friendship.
@@ribbrascalthe betrayal is kind of true. He did nothing to her. And she says he changed but if you really listen to her she didn't say exactly how. She admits he was conservative, nice to her, sarcastic at Yale. And he doesnt seem to have changed. All she has really verified is he changed his mind on trump which he admitted already.
She says "transforming on every conceivable issue".
Yet can't specify what. It actually contradicts her own statement. If he was conservative in college he's conservative now. What changed? She contradicts herself
@@itsallminor6133She does say how...1) on specific policy views 2) on how he talks about and treats others. He saw Trump as reprehensible before in how he talked about and treated others, now he casually demonizes and lies about minority people without a thought (Springfield and his doubling down on the demonizing of the immigrant community the clearest example but countless others.) In his friendship with her the shift is also noticeable. In a text to her about a matter obviously personal to her he distinguishes between normal and abnormal people says liberal policies are a threat to normal people, clearly implying who she is he now sees as a threat. This is an astounding 180 for someone who once invited her and her partner to his wedding.
In short, he sold out for power.
You mean like Harris ditching Biden for power. He was smart and sharp just few days go..boom!
Like Harris!
DD Vance is even worse than a a true believer, he’s a charlatan. He doesn’t believe any of this stuff
Such a powerful conversation. I admire Sophia's courage in sharing her story and living her authentic life. I could hear the pain in her voice over the loss of her friend. I share her question and frustration with the lack of a clear answer as to; how does her being, impact and make harder, the lives of "normal" people.
This all reminds me of the horrific civil war in 1994 Rwanda where neighbors murdered each other ( Hutu vs Tutsi) - and interestingly enough it was INSTIGATED by the CATHOLIC CHURCH.
People who had been neighbors for years.
The murdered figures were as high as 1 million people in 3 months!
Exactly. This is where horrors like start, and it’s happened way too many times in human history not to take it seriously.
So...Im going to make a bold prediction, a sad one, but I think it's likely now: JD Vance's marriage will not survive this election.
And I say this because...Trump made this ideological switch in his politics and betrayed his own prior political beliefs because he's basically a clinical sociopath...he lacks internal empathy to other "humans," so making that flip-flop (and profiting off of it) was easy to do. JD Vance on the other hand, has some kind of empathy and soul (or had at one time), and the flip-flop he has made is only just going to create a greater and greater cognitive dissonance in his mind and soul, and its going eat him up...until he confronts it. And that is going to exact a serious toll on him and his family the longer it lasts.
Thanks Sophia for bringing this to the fore....I really feel for you and your loss of your friend.
I don’t see how Usha has reconciled herself with the “new” J. D.
@@vinista256 JD is already sleeping on the couch you can be sure.
I wonder this too. Melania can run and hide (though you can see she's really not happy), but I just don't see that same coldness in Usha when she appears publicly. If I were in her shoes, I'd be thinking hard about whether I was living a life that I could be proud of.
@@vinista256 she can reconcile herself because apparently she has become a part of the power and wealth elite. I find her strange as Indians do not behave that way. With her level of education and marrying a blue eye white boy shows that she has also shifted the focus from being from humble immigrant daughter of Indian descent to the American dream. She has even resigned her job to join her husband on his campaign. And that is to show you how certain she thinks she would be the wife of the next VP of the US. May be she has even measured the draperies for her new house already. She has no soul just like her husband. Birds of a feather flock together. She will and it seems has "sold her birthright."
I do pity JD's family alot. Usha doesn't seem like a bad person and JD didn't seem like a bad person till he became corrupted by power.
There's a deep hypocrisy here, in that we as citizens of a democracy need to take responsibility for the influences we exert over our politicians. If, as a culture, we pressure politicians to develop, and then reward huge personalities, then I don't think it's fair to portray JD Vance's ideological changes as a complete selling out, or even dishonest. The fact that this election is largely about vibes and personalities instead of substantive policies (on both sides) is to me the greatest evidence that we, as a country, are facilitating these sorts of changes.
On a more practical level, I find it childish to expect a person to hold the same ideas forever, especially taking in the context of people seeking public office.
😭 where did the chill JD go?! Was he ever genuine back then in his support for causes of justice?? Damn! Thank you for doing this interview Sophia.
As I listen to her, I thought about every municipal Black politician (mayors and council members) I ever met, along with Trump and Harris. The key and common denominator is alienation as the other among them all. Vance as the chubby, rural, white kid wanted to be accepted by the elites who looked down on him, so he did what Gramsci and Kruse predicted and said what would happen to people like him. He joined his oppressor(at least as he saw it).
Thank you Sophia, JD can say what he wants about this, but to stay silent is to be complicit in any harm caused by MAGA extremism. Mary Trump talks of having regrets for not coming out sooner to tell the world about her uncle. I'm sure there were also descendants of 1933 Germans who wished more people had not just gone with the flow.
Is it possible that the person you thought you knew early on at Yale was every bit as much of a construct as the one that appeared at or around 2020?
My guess is he was a nice guy and conservative then. And still is now. But when she pulled the "friend card" texting him over the children surgery she broke that. He kept the political views they had separate from their friendship. Perhaps she tried to pull that card to sway him. She already knew he was conservative at Yale.
What would I ask JD Vance: "Can't we all just get along?"
🎉🎉 Trump/Vance 2024 🎉🎉
Thank you Sophia. We need to accept eachother for who they are.
Trans-identified people can't accept themselves for who they are.
I came here to comment and say just how well this interview and Sofia’s responses were beautifully constructed and conducted. Great work NYT✨
people change, obviously. that goes without the motivation for power like this.
Vance believes that parents should be given the right to vote on behalf of their offspring, and he's extremely patriarchal so we have to assume he means that fathers should be given a vote on behalf of their child. He's also said that women should be forced to carry a pregnancy due to rape to term, so someone really should ask him if he thinks that rapists should be given a vote on behalf of the children he helped them father.
@@NoWay1969 Property-holding men were given the right to vote with the clear understanding that they would vote the interests of their household. Gentlemen who were abused or cuckolded by their wives were punished and publicly shamed-instead of their wives-not in order to”blame the victim” but because they were held responsible for all of the men and women and children they supported, even when those men, women and children attacked them.
Even today, women spend 85% of consumer purchases, yet husbands are co-responsible for these purchases, whether they are aware of them or not.
Voting is a responsibility that is still today mostly performed by the more responsible: older folks more than younger, employed more than unemployed. Research shows that unemployment permanently scars the exercise of voting, even after people return to responsibility and work.
If it makes you less unhappy, please know that rapists don’t end up being dependable voters.
Voting is indeed an issue that is experienced very differently after you’re a parent, and after military service. Both are deeply sacrificial acts. And JD is right: things like parenthood change us in a way we can barely fathom. And parenthood could have been one of the ways that Sophia and JD grew apart.
Sounds a lot like Tulsi Gabbard too! How do you flip a switch like that, run as a democrat and 4 years later endorse Trump?! Political chameleons are the worst
It’s called growth and not having a cult mind.
@@CChristi5 wrong it’s called being a opportunist. She had literally no support or platform being democrat so she swings dramatically to the right. We can talk all about how she shut up Kamala during the debate, but her support as a democrat never went above 2%. She endorsed Biden in 2020 and his policies, now Trump’s 4 years later who couldn’t be further apart.
Just one minuet old Biden is smart and sharp then telling him to step down. Just like that! So sad!
Hey, it happens. In 2016, I was for Bernie, now Trump. Situations change. Society changes. Personal beliefs change. This is not unique to Vance or Gabbard.
Maybe he was just as much a chameleon with her as he is in public now
That’s exactly what I was thinking. He got something from his relationship with Sofia and then discarded her when he didn’t need her anymore.
Trust me honey you were potential material for a book he wanted to write.
I applaud the courage it took for Sofia to share the particulars of her friendship with JD Vance. Could it be possible JD is just talking the talk/walking the walk to get "into the club", but when push comes to shove, he will do the RIGHT THING?? Clearly, the friendship he had with Sofia and their many exchanges remains in the landscape of his mind and could hold sway.
Sharing private messages. Classy.
Power holds more sway.
“Everything Trump touches, dies.” If Trump loses, it does not bode well for his campaign staff. Vance will be pretty much be done.
it seems that an exploration of his new inner agenda, would be a good conversation to have with Vance.... it's wonderful to hear the compassion and thoughtfulness in Sofia's voice....it is so hard to understand the Trump cult.... hopefully America's democratic structure can weather the storm 💙💙💙🕊🪺✔✍🏽🇺🇸😎
it would be fascinating to watch as Vance listened to this interview...with pauses as he commented
Haunting. Haunting. Haunting. Vance is sad, sad, sad.
Thank you!
Wow. Just wow.
This makes me sad. Thought JD Vance would have made trump at least less extreme.
@@meh4062 But that wasn’t likely-since Vance has turned out to be even more extreme than Trump.
Thanks for telling me JD Vance hasn't really changed. He was conservative, nice and somewhat sarcastic before and still is
Life now feels like a very sad movie.
Oh, yes. I'll trust a they/them on anything they/them say. Just as I trust in my schizophrenic brother when he says the earth is flat.
I also lost friends over politics. We didn’t have an outright argument but they just ghosted me for supporting Bernie Sanders. At this point I don’t see much in common with them anymore and wouldn’t want to be friends again.
He hides much from his own self and definitely those around him.
Vance is emblematic of people who are influenced by the internet. Russell Brand is the same.They are both intelligent but easily led. They also seek power. A dangerous combination.
I don't agree with sharing private conversations, especially only segments. They only way I can justify it is that he discussed her in his memoir, making her a character to present himself as receptive to diverse viewpoints. Still it feels wrong.
Seinfeld looking at JD drag photo -JD Trans
George Costanza: "Not that there's anything wrong with that."
So much here can be explained as, pandering. Being disingenuous in word and action is never attractive. Changing position, through new information and reasoning, is a growth supporting process. If turning one’s back, for political reasonings, on a friend/cohort is another matter. Parsing the bs/truth, for the righteous, is never ending. Imo, both of the featured characters here have axes to grind and are now playing in the big game. They are both still learning. Being, or representative of way left and way right achieves little in the conversations that have to be had. This is little more than pointing fingers. Our world has way too much of that already in the political arena. I want more from the generation I am so waiting to represent the future.
I have empathy for people who suffer from traumatic experiences as Vance supposedly has. That being said, I do not believe that they have a place in leadership roles over others, especially as high ranking officials in the US government. Vance's decision to be a sell out to himself translates into his ability to be a sell out for the American people. Just as Vance believes that people without children should have less rights than people who do, the same can be said about a person who suffers from mental health issues being permitted to run for or hold any political office. This is a question all Americans should carefully consider, but I wonder if Vance would appreciate such an application?
Interesting and moving interview. I also worry about Vance’s integrity but I don’t think revealing personal correspondence is a wise method for eventually healing the divide or encouraging better communication.
This is not about healing a divide or encouraging a conversation. This is about exposing how much the person who might be second in line to the presedency has sold out to get power. This is to warn the people who will vote about him.
This is not about some fluffy undivided world that doesn`t exist. This is about warning people of danger that will come for them in form of extreme and regressive policies promoted by that man second in line if they don`t pay attention.
This is not about healing a divide or encouraging a conversation. This is about exposing how much the person who might be second in line to the presedency has sold out to get power. This is to warn the people who will vote about him.
@@anthill1510reading between the lines. She says he was conservative and sarcastic and nice at Yale. He's still the same. It appears more she became upset when he ran for political office.
And by the text message she sent "gender affirming care for children" that's not really a hill you want to die on when pulling the "friend card" knowing they are conservative and you are far left progressive.
@@itsallminor6133 JD Vance advocates for a national abortion ban, the ending of no-fault-divorce, defunding of the public school system, defunding of all kinds of social programs and he is backed up by a detailed plan written down in Project 2025.
To me it seems like he pivoted in his believes to gain power, but it`s not really important if he always was like that or if he personally believes in these policies he wants to write into law. The policies itself are the actual problem.
Hey, Sofia... You go girl! Get on tour, tell the whole country what an asshole JDV is. Get the NYT to pick up the tab.
Sofia, you are a champion for sharing your life with us. It's very sad to see someone you were so close with push for such hurtful changes that directly affect you and the community you are fighting for. There can be a place in this world for everyone.
Thank you for sharing your story,💙 Vote Blue America 🇺🇸
JD states they use "they/them" pronouns, yet NYT's went out of their way to title this interview "SHE used to be friends with JD Vance"....I came here in the middle of listening to the JD Vance interview to try to get some context behind what JD was claiming. I'm starting to think the NYT has one foot in Trump's pocket.
The NYT thinks it helps their argument to portray this person as a woman in this instance. They want to emphasize this is a poor little woman being bullied by big bad man, JD Vance. The pronouns change based on the perceived benefit in different situations.
She doesn't know how the cha ging society is affecting people?
Why don't you explain?
Yuck, politics aside, sharing personal correspondence without the other person’s permission is just disgusting.
Luckily all Sofia’s acquaintances now have fair warning…
Our country's future is on the line. Why wouldn't she when one could see the drastic shift in his philosophy for his political ambition?
I'm sure all of her acquaintances that plan on becoming fascist will take note of that.
@@jab78c41ql6likely she was paid for this, don’t make it out like there is a hero, just another yale grad making a buck
It is important before Americans vote to know our possible VP is (as she said) “willing to turn his back on his core values in order to amass money and power.”
So normal, is only what he perceives as normal is that right ?
Babaro is legitimately the worst interviewer. Somehow Sophia carried him through that.
With friends like this who needs enemies. Just wants to get in the spotlight since he was selected as Trumps running mate. What kind of friend is this that is so jealous of his success that old emails of their conversation were published. 😑
This person is way too emotional and hurt by someone who changed view for better for the country. It’s not about her only.
Not for one person’s view. Can you imagine how Biden felt when he was told he needs to step down when just few days ago all his so called friends telling the world that he is smart and sharp and fine to lead then boom! That hurts!
Power stuff. Please ensure her well-being.
Feeling mixed about these emails being made public. But I definitely think your expectation of privacy drops when you decide to run for Vice President of the United States. It's part of the deal. Would the same commenters have complained if an old acquaintance of, say, Hillary Clinton had released some of their emails during that campaign? Call me cynical, but I doubt it.
Fascinating account
JDV appears to me to be your standard on-the-make, greasy-pole-climbing opportunist who'll say your shit smells of roses if it improves his share price. He is, as we say here in the UK, a member of the Cambridge University Netball Team (better known by its abbreviated name). Oh, and a good actor. As for this smart, eloquent woman losing a "friend", she'll get over it, come to realise he was always on the make, a chameleon, as others here have said. "Brave"? This isn't Iwo Jima.
I’m a lifelong liberal Democrat who walked away from the party in 2017. Not everyone in MAGA is out for political power and opportunism. The hypocrisy of wanting the world to accept your complete change in gender and appearance but not giving the same courtesy to someone who has evolved in their own pursuits and opinions is the reason people are over the Democrats.
What Vance is pushing now would take away her rights and the rights of others in that community. What is hard to understand about that?
Another Yale grad making a buck off of betrayal…. Sofia Yale taught you well
lame post
TOO MUCH CONFUSION IN THE DONALD TRUMP NEWEST CAMPAIGN HERE IN 2024!!!
Vance is a monster who has no real beliefs. He is a tragic story of Faust
Can you explain please? She says he was conservative in Yale. He's still conservative. I'm not seeing a change. It does sound like she misses him
@@itsallminor6133did you even listen to anything that was said?
@@loganemmert1392 entire thing. Twice. I'm actually beginning to wonder if she like him and he rejected her. "He was so nice" and then he changed. No explanation into what really changed
Ohio State grads are just as fabulous as ivy League scrubs
This sort of palace intrigue is beneath actual journalists.
It's such rat fuck behavior
Beautiful
The only thing i learned from this episode is that i cannot trust my 'liberal' friends. Sofia is a untrustworthy backstabber
All is fair in war, and we are fighting for our freedom
@orion6372 Freedom to brainwash children and mutilate their bodies? Or the 'freedom' to censor 'freedom of speech'? Or freedom to jail political opponents on bogus charges that'd put even Putin and Xi Jinping to shame
Real friends do not try to take away the rights of their college friends by gaining political power. The betrayal is on Vance’s part.
@bevtaylor5466 The fact that you've to lie to support this backstabbing means you know as well she is wrong
Sofia was right to speak up but wrong to leak messages. And let’s get real - gender affirming care for kids isn’t the hill to die on. Most people don’t agree with it across the political spectrum
I am a progressive Democrat who has a lot of concern about the health problems that the medical and surgical transition of minors cause.
I started listening on spotify and wanted to share my frustration, so came here to leave a comment.
After a few minutes it became clear what this was, and I stopped listening.
It’s an old uni friend of Vance, who had made private correspondence public.
Am I the only one who finds that unethical? Shame on you New York Times.
I hope that Trump and Vance won’t win the election.
But going through private correspondence from like a decade or two earlier, is ridiculous.
Maybe it’s because in the US’s news media isn’t unbiased, but this would be looked down on in most of Europe.
Bad look for Sofia Nelson and NYT
Did you expect something different? These are campaign wings of the dnc
A hit piece brought to you by the American Stasi... Unethical and *weird* story.
Breaking that bond of friendship and leaking personal correspondence simply does not sit well with me. You've sacrificed a principle, and I don't think Vance would have betrayed you in such a way. I find it ironic when Sophia says he has a lack of integrity, while not having the integrity of confidentiality.
He broke the bond when he aligned himself with Thiel and Project 2025. He is trying to enact policies to hurt others. Why is he trying to hurt others? That is what this is about.
It's a tough call, but I think it serves the public interest to know about Vance's radically shifting views. If he is elected, Sophia likely views this as a threat to her and other transgender people. I don't think she's wrong about the threat, and I respect the fact that she did not leak this information anonymously.
@@QuietRefl4378what exactly shifted? She says he was conservative and on the opposite end of the political spectrum than she was at Yale. I see no change. .
He was nice to her then, probably would still be. I think she did possibly throw a wrench in it texting him over the child surgery bill. He probably thought she crossed a line pulling the "friend card" , I only speculate .
If he was conservative at Yale. She was tran progressive at Yale. What changed? Other than he ran for office. The fact he was so nice to her, having completely opposing views makes me actually think JD is probably a really good person.
I agree here. Trust was broken I think. For what purpose? I don't know. If he was conservative at Yale and he's still conservative now I don't see a difference. My only question would be how much of his writing to her was to placate her being nice to a friend to avoid arguments
@@QuietRefl4378I don't see a shift. She says he was conservative at Yale on the opposite end of the spectrum and he still is. What shift
There's a very Deep naivety in full display here.
How so?
Is the title of this video misgendering Sofia?
When he used the term normal, she could have asked more questions about other peoples perspectives context and experiences. Again at the end she asks a question but doesn’t really show real curiosity, depth, or empathy. It’s an empty question and empty assertion. It’s better to emulate critical thinking and ask questions for clarity in a sincere way. It seems bigoted and narrow minded when there are these obvious and glaring signs that this is not a good faith or fair minded inquiry. It may be experienced as cruelty.
I feel immense sympathy for what Sophia has gone through with what clearly was a close friend. But this has also made me more sympathetic to Vance, and I think I like him more now.
Not challenging you, but could you please expand on liking Vance more
Good point, didn't know anything about Vance. His friend Sofia used him for fame.
What makes you like him more??
A person who would forsake the safety of those he considered friends and sacrifice their human rights in a naked pursuit of power is something that you find endearing?
To each their own I guess. I personally find it morally repugnant.
@@craigpoeryour opinion of this woman “using him for fame” seems to disregard a fundamental idea.
If your friend commit a high profile crime and got away with it, and you felt it was your duty to notify the police, and then reporters reached out to you. Are you preying on the victims of a crime for fame?
JD Vance is on a path to strip this person and other trans people of their identity and access to modern healthcare. Perhaps it is not a 1:1 comparison with my “crime” analogy, but for many people, it is incumbent on them to prevent harm to society when they are able.
To say it another way. If you see an impending train wreck, and take action to stop it. You’re not “using the train” as a pathway to fame. In fact, even if no one else in the world knew that you could have stopped the train wreck, most people would live with a heavily guilty conscious if they let countless people suffer when they could have intervened.
Sofia is speaking to avert what she believes to be a personal and societal disaster that would lead to the harm of many of her what I suspect is her closest friends.
For you to perceive that as “using Vance for fame”…it’s hard to understand.
I don’t even have to agree with her positions to understand that her speaking out is a very understandable action.
What's wrong with the changing point of views on politics? As I grow older I turn more conservative. I mean she changed her sex, people change and evolve. Making drama out of nothing. The people who demand tolerance are the least tolerant.
Cringey podcast scripted from the beginning to end.
Being tolerant of Vance’s intolerance would not prove noble character.
He was clearly ok with allowing people to live their own lives until the temptation of money and power became too irresistible. The difference between how you portray this conversation and someone who is seeking a rational understanding is that one side is taking away rights and the other side is heartfelt about ‘live and let live’. Just so we’re clear, Vance only talks about taking away rights.
The fact this conversation makes you uncomfortable enough to try and shut it all down tells me that you know there is truth in what I say and “drama” is your security blanket. Find your bravery, the world doesn’t have to be an ugly place.
JD has adopted a maturity to his views based on life experiences. Is a free and thoughtful person allowed to change there ideologies as life experiences add to insight in being a public servant. Trying to please everyone pleases no one but as a public servant should serve for the betterment of the society, which is up for discussion
That you see it as more mature is laughable.
🤔
You think t’s mature for Vance to say married women should have to stay in abusive relationships and to characterize childless women as unhappy cat ladies? ??
JD Vance revealed his Heart to Sophia.
One’s Heart does not change absent severe trauma.
Vance is the same person he was at Yale.
You think the only way a heart changes is trauma? Yikes. Listen, get out of therapy. It's leading you down a dark path.
No, he is not. Or at least he acts like he is not. It doesn`t really matter what "his heart" says, it matters what kind of policies he promotes and implements as a politician. The kind of policies he promotes now are clearly extreme and regressive, he is not searching for a balanced worldview any more.
It doesn`t matter if he actually is convinced of what he says, it matters what laws and structures he promotes that will influence everybodys life.
22:34 "I am a normal person. Queer people are normal americans I supp... whatever"
This made me realize JD is actually a very good guy. Despite opposing viewpoints politically, ideological, he was still very nice to this person. It's appears to me the person became upset when jd put his personal views into the political machine. My guess is he's the same person that went to yale with her. She said he was a conservative then. I don't see the change. I also suspect some of his response was to placate her, trying to be nice. Other than that she is upset now using a political card to throw a wrench. It's also interesting to hear and understand that JD really does know the progressive left from first hand experience. So he is knowledgeable about the situation and both sides. He just didn't stop being a conservative.
He stoped being conservative when he started seeking political power to take away the rights of people like his former friend. He is extremist, not conservative. Most conservatives want little government interference in people’s lives-live and let live. That’s why many traditional conservatives are now leaving the Republican Party.
If Jesus had to chose perfect men as his disciples he would had have zero disciples.
But Judas was the only one to completely turn his back for self-gain.
And yet he chose people with a good heart. Tell me, because I'm very curious, what actions taken by Donald Trump indicate that he has a good heart?
Nice hit job. Unsubscribing my subscription.
"unsubscribing my subscription" lol I love it when people reveal how stupid they are in such a succinct manner.
👍
Please change the title of the video to not misgender Sophia! They use they/them pronouns
Woke cultist.
Bwah ha ha ha ha
Gays for Hamas member how sweet. I mean stupid. I'm sooo shocked by she/he/they and the flaming interviewer stance. Not
She? LMAO
The betrayal of trust is more telling of her than him tbh.
My sympathy is for Trump. But actually her private emails have given me a softer, more human, impression of J.D. Vance. So in my particular case her mission to thwart J.D. Vance has had the opposite effect. I simply like J.D. Vance more, after having heard her private conversations. The real problem for herself, is that no friend can ever feel safe with her. Revealing private conversations and emails is a no-go, even if you disagree politically.