All three jets are great pieces of engineering. The Boeing and Airbus are larger than the Superjet 100 and is really in the realm of the Bombardier and Embraer regional jet classes. After looking at many video clips and reading up on the Sukhoi Superjet, I have to say, in my opinion, the Superjet 100 wins hands down. Though the Superjet is a Russian jet, it is really and international jet if you look at all of the components which makes up the Superjet. I am not saying anything negative about Embraer or Bombardier because they do make top notch aircraft in the regional jet category. When you look at price in the equation, you can almost, and in some cases can, buy two Superjets for the price of one of the other two competitors. Sukhoi had Boeing as a consultant on this project and other top names in the industry. It is too bad American companies do not invest in this aircraft because they would be getting more for their money. I believe politics is greatly involved here and hopefully things will change here in the near future. Sukhoi & Russia came up with a winner on this one.
Actually, they didn't. The problems are many. First, the engines. Those engines won't get certified for a number of reasons (some being politics.) Second, and by far the biggest problem is that Sukhoi lacks a distribution, maintenance and training network around the world. Operators would expect parts to be delivered the day after they're ordered without excuses and need mechanics, tools and knowledge of maintenance to be commonplace wherever they fly, which doesn't exist. The last problem is production capability. Operators don't want to buy 10 aircraft a year. They need the factory to meet their demand on time because time is money. Right now, Sukhoi cannot produce these aircraft fast enough to deliver a lot of them quickly. Moreover, they cannot produce parts fast enough to supply the aircraft already in service while producing new ones. Those are their biggest problems. They are a one trick pony that can only produce enough for Russia and even then, not for all the airlines who want them.
@@afcgeo882 Yes, unfortunately you're right. SSJ100 is a great product by itself yet as a business model it was very raw, so it pretty much flopped. And it's a double shame because it exists in the niche with a deficiency of planes in it so it could have easily conquered it. I hope UAC learned their lesson and MS-21, Russian answer to B737 and A320, will be "arranged" more responsibly.
@@kingking-qj5bp Go say it to the Russian nuclear reactors which make everything American look like a stone age tech. Or to the NASA rockets which for decades already rely on Russian engines.
I am a flight attendant on the SSJ. Its a lovely plane with loads of workspace in the rear galley. However, it's quite noisy and dry, and the landings can a bit rough because the pilots have all controls over the breaks. SSJ will always have a special place in my heart❤
The Mexican Airlines upgraded their Fleet they bought a good number of the Sukhoi superjet I had the chance to fly several times in them pretty freaking comfortable, and during the World Cup we flow from Mexico City to Moscow Russia we flew in the LL69 Russian airline" and I tell you I was pretty impressed!!
Flew the SSJ-100 2 times this week, on a route were they very recently replaced Avro planes. The SSJ is an excellent regional jet with very high passenger comfort.
I'm really impressed with the Sukhoi SuperJet 100, it's a nice looking aircraft, although it shouldn't be compared to the A320 and 737 because to me, it looks more like a regional Embraer E170 or Bombardier C series ( Now airbus A220 )
SSJ is a regional jet with 100 passengers on board. 737(189 Passengers) and a320 - medium range, long range planes. Intesting to see after 3-5 years the video A-320 vs B737 vs Irkut MC-21(Yakovlev 242). That will be interesting.)))
Why are you comparing these aircraft? The SU-100 is a regional jet. Its comparables are the Embraer E-190 and the Bombardier CS series or even the Boeing 717 or A318. Certainly not an A320 or 737.
Actually, it is by most means a regional jet. The 318 was developed for the 95-115 seat market. Its maximum passenger load being 132. The low MTOW version was developed to compete with the Boeing 717, which was an updated version of the DC-9 made for low to medium density hops between small to medium sized airports with low levels of ground service. In fact, the reason why the 318 did so poorly in sales is because regional jets from the Embraer and Canadair families appeared and were much easier to service compared with the high up A318. Remember, the E-195 is designed for up to 124 passenger while the CRJ-1000 goes up to 100 seats. The Bombardier C series CS100 seat up to 133. The higher operating cost versus its competitors and the fact that it was so high off the ground, requiring baggage lift machines to operate are the reasons it didn't do well in the market. Because of the aircraft's high MTOW version, it has done somewhat better than Boeing's replacement for the 717... the 737-600 and it sold a few as a VIP jet and to a handful of airlines, including British Airways, which uses it out of City Airport in London, an airport which only allows regional jets. You really should read up on the subject before commenting.
Let's say it depends on the definition. Capacity is one point, but range is one other. The A318 is capable of transatlantic flights after all. However the definitions most likely are about to change in the near future anyway, as the 737 MAX will be able to cross the pond as well AFAIK. LCY allows only aircraft capable of steep approaches, which is not the same as regional aircraft - although most (or all?) of these meet that criterium.
I don't know about how you personally classify aircraft, but the airline industry classifies aircraft by maximum capacity. A Cessna Caravan can fly transatlantic. Range is a function of weight versus fuel burn and you can always increase your fuel tanks, which is what BA did with their A318s, which are actually technically 318 business jets. They have extra fuel tanks AND reduced weight AND still land in Shannon to refuel when west-bound. The A318, is not, by any means a "transatlantic" aircraft. On the other hand, you simply cannot fit more seats than the aircraft is designed for and have it certified. That's why it's the seat capacity that classifies aircraft and in every industry publication, you will see the market and aircraft classes being described by their seat number. By the way, many regional jets and A318s cannot do steep approaches. BA had a few of their A318s reconfigured for this. There's an interesting article about the certification for the new CS100 you may want to read: atwonline.com/manufacturers/bombardier-completes-cs100-flight-between-london-city-new-york-jfk The CS100 is specifically building the aircraft to be able to replace the A318s for the LCY to JFK route. The CS100 is the same size and capability as the A318.
SSJ100 is smaller then a 737 and A320, so you can't really compare them. Still i really like the SSJ100, it's a nice plane. My first choice would be the 737 then A320 and then SSJ100.
Because of Sukhois cooperation with Boeing, I would say that the SSJ is a nice successor for the 737-200/-500. Would be nice if there were more in western Europe.
What cooperation? Sukhoi is simply being advised by consultants from Boeing. There's no cooperation and it will never be a successor to the 737-200 or the 500 because there was a 600 series to do that AND A318 and they didn't sell well. Regional jets such as the CS series from Bombardier, E series from Embraer and the MRJ series from Mitsubishi will be servicing most of the world. Sukhoi can't get certification or ramp up production enough to satisfy any orders on time. They would also need better engines and a supply chain.
The SSJ 100 has a very narrow cabin. The Bombardier CS - the Bombardier CS has a 5-seats abreast configuration, just like the SSJ 100 - has a cabin that is more than 30cm wider than the cabin of the SSJ 100.
The A320 takes my top vote of all the narrow-bodies, except for the 757. However I personally think it'd be more appropriate to compare a SSJ-100 to an CS-100.
+AirbusFreak757 can I remind you, that the airplane that sent 757 to the corner of the market was A321. A321's performance is worse than A320, but decisively better than B757 and carries the same number of passengers as the latter. Perhaps 757 has a kind of emotional value for you, as A310 for me, but I'd never say A310 is better than B767...
western propaganda everywere.... Well, people were talking like that about Embraer and now these brazilian babies are flying all around the globe. I dont think Sukhoi or Tupolev will have that kind of success, but they build great planes.
Sukhoi leased to your, I mean Indonesian company PT Sky Aviation SSJ100 at really favourable conditions, but not the airplanes were the reason why PT Sky bankrupted... The poor airplanes were abandoned in Batam and Surabaya for two years until Sukhoi restored them at their own cost and returned them back to Russia. If you cannot run this business, even airplanes for free won't help you...
Hace poco hice el mismo vuelo en un B737 de Ryanair nuevo con solo 3 meses y en un A320 de Vueling tambien nuevo son solo mes y medio, los acabados interiores del airbus me parecieron mejores pero tengo que decir que el espacio entre asientos era mejor en el Boeing por lo demas ambos vuelan fenomenal muy comodos y sin apenas ruido interior.
I flew toMoscow on a 90 and it was very comfortable, professional crew (Aeroflot) and was very comfortable compared to 737 and 320 whose airlines crammed the seats together. It is a smaller aircraft for just such flights as mine. The stretched 737 and 320 are pushing out the 21's usefulness but if Russia is price competitive then maybe it will fill the Russian need for modern aircraft for longer, fuller flights.
How much SSJ100 stands out from the Boeing B 737 and the Airbus A320 around. Even the noise of this speaks in favor of the SSJ100. SSJ100 luxury aircraft. ))
Why compare the A320? The A320's engines can power two SSJ100s. The only comparisons would be the A318 and the 737-600 and they're not any louder than the SSJ100.
All planes looks Wooh! May be some architecture hidden attributes factors. I wonder why many commentators are biased about SSJ 100 cause only it's not common at there eyes
SSJ100 is new to the world but with the new engine the Russian came out with the new engine it will reduce the noise significantly although it's a new plane it has a great redundancy more than the Boeing and Airbus there is another one that's called MC 21 or something I had that's even better they got a long way to catch up my personal opinion they're all good they all go through the same pacification it is just one's personal preference
The Sukhoi would be so much nicer and number one choice if it had winglets. Very nice aircraft, nicer than Boeing or Airbus. They should build the same a few size bigger. Well done Russians!
Winglets are set to reduce the dynamic resistance of the aircraft caused by air flow from the high pressure zone (under the wing) in the low pressure zone (above the wing). Dry solved this problem saving on weight when made wingtips rounded, so the air in the zone of the seal on the front of the wing moving along the wing sweep blows disturbed flow over the wing area, and the problem is solved without the dynamic resistance winglets. At the same time, aircraft have saved on weight and drag to performance improvement. It's funny to read such comments. Sukhoi Design Bureau, as of today, is the best semilong in the world in the field of aerodynamics. You have the Su-30/35 put winglets offer ... Laugh.
No worries! Winglets are coming soon on SSJ! Though mainly for being inline with the fashion trend... We see, that even Airbus gave up the "Wingtip Fence" in favour of the "sharklets".
Happy Sukhoi SSJ 100 airplane that dashing dashing steady look good luck always and continue to work, greetings to all and thank Javier Rullan Ruano for his video
Sukhoi needs to engineer some overwing exits to help with passenger evacuation, in case of an emergency rendering either the forward pair of doors or the rearward pair of doors unuseable.
Some "versus". You show some stock footage of the planes, give no information, no comparison, and lie and say it is a versus.. Another waste of minutes
Flughtglobal.com Mexican carrier Interjet has grounded 11 Sukhoi Superjet 100s with stabiliser defects pending repairs. The aircraft were grounded after inspections of the 22 SSJ100s in Interjet’s fleet were completed on 27 December 2016, Mexico’s civil aviation authority says in a statement.
i never seen before Russian commercial aircraft in real.I work at a private airlines.I only see Airbus,Boeing & old McDonnell Douglas.These aircraft Sukhoi or Topelov , i mean passenger carrier aircraft,are these aircraft costly so much?what about these aircraft operating system? I have question, as a pilot which aircraft do you prefer?Maintenance, fuel.......lLS system?
eso es muy bueno para todos la competencia mejora las cosas para todos, me gustaría que se comparar costos de adquisición, costos de mantenimiento, alcance , ruido, todas las especificaciones técnicas. that is very good for all competition makes things better for all, I would like acquisition costs, maintenance costs, scope, comparing noise, all technical specifications.( Muy buen video)
+Влад Ткач Необъективно сравнивать разные классы самолетов, тк Сухой является (!)региональным (RRJ-Russian Rejional Jet) самолетом и по идее его необходимо сравнивать с CRJ , Bombardierом , Embraerом . Как доказательство приведу характеристики вместимости машин: B737- от 103 (B731) до 215(B739ER) A320-100-200 (140 -180 ) SSJ(RRJ)-100 - до 108 (98 в базовой пассажиров) также Сухой сильно уступает в дальности полета (3,5 т км против 5-ти) (с)Википедия
What ever are the technical expects, which one is better, I can't say, but one thing I can say for sure SU-SSJ-100 is most beautiful in all. Of those lol
They aren't competitors, so I can't choose. The 737 is the world's most popular airplane, and can do anything from short hop to medium haul. The A320 competes more with the CRJ & ERJ aircraft that serve smaller regional airports... It was designed to serve European destinations a few hundred km apart, and at that job it's quite good, but I can't imagine riding in one for the longer US & International routes..
Have you ever seen live Superjet 100? We fly it? )))) Superjet-100 is a regional jet that has inside dimensions of medium-range aircraft. Many airlines in the world to buy the Superjet 100, precisely because it is one of the rare regional aircraft passenger cabin where the dimensions are equivalent to medium-haul aircraft. You have to fly on a plant ATR-72, then on Embraer-190 and then on the Superjet-100, that's when you will be able to compare how good the Superjet-100. A-320 and 737 medium-haul aircraft is surprising that the author of the video is trying to compare them with the regional 100. The representative of the Mexican airline InterJet who bought Superjet-100 said, "we bought the regional aircraft because of the medium-range passenger shifting her A-320 in the regional aircraft does not feel any difference in comfort in favor of the A-320."
Sukhoi has got a good looking jet, but I would swap out the engines for something by Rolls-Royce, also where are the over the wing evacuation openings in case of emergency? There is only the front and the back to get out of the plane in case of emergency. How much is Sukhoi asking for one of these planes?
Летал (в качестве пассажира) на всех трех, они все отличные, Airbus и Сухой оборудованы авионикой "Thales", имеют электродистанционную систему управления (Fly by wire), Boeing нет, но он и старше всех, просто модернизировался уже не однократно и лично я больше люблю 737 NG,
Boeing 737NG also use fly by wire systems (thrust control) and the flight controls are still electronic, although not technically "fly-by-wire", and Thales is just one company that makes avionics and there are better. Each airline has a choice of many avionics systems to install in their 737s. China Southern and China Eastern has ordered Thales for their 737s for example. I believe most 737s have been ordered with Honeywell, which are fantastic and exceptionally fitted for the 737. To be completely fair, most modern aircraft utilize systems from multiple manufacturers, picking each system separately. The 787 uses a mostly Rockwell Collins flight deck and avionics suite, but the EFB is by Astronautics Corp. of America, the FMS, inertial nav, nav radios, the long-range radio altimeter, ADF, DME, crew info system/maintenance system, and the coms management systems are by Honeywell. The 737MAX will have a similar system that will also power the 777x, the new U.S. Air Force KC-46 tanker and the 757/767 avionics upgrades. To the pilot, the differences between Thales, Rockwell Collins and Honeywell are very minor and usually no special training is required to switch from one to the other.
Que buen video!!!, en el Airbus y el Boing se ve en la parte trasera casi en la cola una pequeña compuerta abierta, alguien sabe que es y por que la llevan abierta mientras carretean? The Boing and the Airbus have a small door in the tail, what's his funtion and why the small door is open while the airplane taxi?
Hola: Si te refieres a por ejemplo la que se ve en el minuto 1:45 eso es el APU, es una pequeña turbina que da energía al avión si tiene los motores apagadod, como por ejemplo en la puerta de embarque. si no es eso, ¿podrias especificar el minuto en el que se ve? Espero que te sirva de ayuda.
I'm mot a pilot, engineer, or plane expert... but at 1:18, i was surprised to see the airbus with the friggin engine pylon in the way of the turbofan! Lol. That seems like an obvious disadvantage as far as thrust. Idk... perhaps someone could clarify the reason, or difference. To a layman. Thanks, nice video mate.
Yeah these planes are great but why not an ultra long range jets like Boeing 777,747 airbus a380,a350. Or not most convent planes to buy like cessna 152,172,310, or even the 414?
Many smaller airports in Russia have less than ideal quality runways. Since the aircraft was designed for regional service, it was designed to operate out of such austere conditions.
No,no,no,no...You can't comparing the SSJ100 whith a320 or 737,cause it's regional jet.You can comparing this aircraft with regional and buisnes jets(CRJ700 etc.)
Sukhoi is small. You made bad comparison. Only Yakovlev Irkut MC21 stands as competitor with Airbus A320 Boeing 737. May be also Tupolev 214 that stands near A321' 737-900 or 757
Lie. The first Airbus to use winglets was the A310-300 in 1985. The first Boeing to use them was the 747-400, which also came out in 1985. The first Tu-204 flew in 1989. Even the A320 had fences in 1987.
not true. winglets was already testet on stols short after ww2. on passanger airplanes the first winglets was used on airbus 320-300(1982) your tu204 just come out 1989 firstflight
![Airbus A320 Neo VS Boeing 737-8 MAX [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3yyG2L8W4ug/mqdefault.jpg)
![Airbus A320 Neo VS Boeing 737-8 MAX [4K]](/img/tr.png)
All three jets are great pieces of engineering. The Boeing and Airbus are larger than the Superjet 100 and is really in the realm of the Bombardier and Embraer regional jet classes. After looking at many video clips and reading up on the Sukhoi Superjet, I have to say, in my opinion, the Superjet 100 wins hands down. Though the Superjet is a Russian jet, it is really and international jet if you look at all of the components which makes up the Superjet. I am not saying anything negative about Embraer or Bombardier because they do make top notch aircraft in the regional jet category. When you look at price in the equation, you can almost, and in some cases can, buy two Superjets for the price of one of the other two competitors. Sukhoi had Boeing as a consultant on this project and other top names in the industry. It is too bad American companies do not invest in this aircraft because they would be getting more for their money. I believe politics is greatly involved here and hopefully things will change here in the near future. Sukhoi & Russia came up with a winner on this one.
Actually, they didn't. The problems are many. First, the engines. Those engines won't get certified for a number of reasons (some being politics.) Second, and by far the biggest problem is that Sukhoi lacks a distribution, maintenance and training network around the world. Operators would expect parts to be delivered the day after they're ordered without excuses and need mechanics, tools and knowledge of maintenance to be commonplace wherever they fly, which doesn't exist. The last problem is production capability. Operators don't want to buy 10 aircraft a year. They need the factory to meet their demand on time because time is money. Right now, Sukhoi cannot produce these aircraft fast enough to deliver a lot of them quickly. Moreover, they cannot produce parts fast enough to supply the aircraft already in service while producing new ones. Those are their biggest problems. They are a one trick pony that can only produce enough for Russia and even then, not for all the airlines who want them.
George L agreed 100%
I've flown on a Sukhoi and it's nothing special.
@@afcgeo882 Yes, unfortunately you're right. SSJ100 is a great product by itself yet as a business model it was very raw, so it pretty much flopped.
And it's a double shame because it exists in the niche with a deficiency of planes in it so it could have easily conquered it. I hope UAC learned their lesson and MS-21, Russian answer to B737 and A320, will be "arranged" more responsibly.
Anything russian, is a trying hard second rate copycat.
@@kingking-qj5bp Go say it to the Russian nuclear reactors which make everything American look like a stone age tech. Or to the NASA rockets which for decades already rely on Russian engines.
I am a flight attendant on the SSJ. Its a lovely plane with loads of workspace in the rear galley. However, it's quite noisy and dry, and the landings can a bit rough because the pilots have all controls over the breaks. SSJ will always have a special place in my heart❤
The Sukhoi SSJ 100 is beautiful!
SSJ 100 Boeingnosky
Он отвратительный. Я не понимаю как можно любить этот самолет. У нас в России о не говорят плохо либо вообще ничего
@@tagirguseinov2243 Он охуенный. Я не понимаю как можно не любить этот самолет. У нас в России о нем все говорят и хвалят.
The three airplanes are beautiful so for me we can’t say wich aircraft is better.
@@tagirguseinov2243нормальный.
The Mexican Airlines upgraded their Fleet they bought a good number of the Sukhoi superjet I had the chance to fly several times in them pretty freaking comfortable, and during the World Cup we flow from Mexico City to Moscow Russia we flew in the LL69 Russian airline" and I tell you I was pretty impressed!!
Great video!! I like the SSJ100. Great design.
+Addicted To Planes Thanks!
@Limboplays Games
Like your dirty mind
@Limboplays Games yes it shouldn't have wings.... it's clearly copied from Boeing and Airbus..
Boeingnoski
Flew the SSJ-100 2 times this week, on a route were they very recently replaced Avro planes. The SSJ is an excellent regional jet with very high passenger comfort.
Good luck Sukhoi. Nothing wrong with competition 🇬🇧
I'm really impressed with the Sukhoi SuperJet 100, it's a nice looking aircraft, although it shouldn't be compared to the A320 and 737 because to me, it looks more like a regional Embraer E170 or Bombardier C series ( Now airbus A220 )
Ssj100 Boeingnosky
SSJ is a regional jet with 100 passengers on board. 737(189 Passengers) and a320 - medium range, long range planes. Intesting to see after 3-5 years the video A-320 vs B737 vs Irkut MC-21(Yakovlev 242). That will be interesting.)))
да, интересно было бы посмотреть)
Vitaliy, the Boeing 737-600 and Airbus 318 were designed for the 100 passenger markets.
A320 and B738 are not A318 and B736)))))
They aren't, but they are. They hold the same certification AND they were created to be almost identical.
❤ SSJ 100
i really dont see any performance comparisons. just a few jets taking off. the video should be called "sukhoi/boeing/airbus" take off's
Why are you comparing these aircraft? The SU-100 is a regional jet. Its comparables are the Embraer E-190 and the Bombardier CS series or even the Boeing 717 or A318. Certainly not an A320 or 737.
+++
The A318 is by no means a regional jet.
Actually, it is by most means a regional jet. The 318 was developed for the 95-115 seat market. Its maximum passenger load being 132. The low MTOW version was developed to compete with the Boeing 717, which was an updated version of the DC-9 made for low to medium density hops between small to medium sized airports with low levels of ground service. In fact, the reason why the 318 did so poorly in sales is because regional jets from the Embraer and Canadair families appeared and were much easier to service compared with the high up A318. Remember, the E-195 is designed for up to 124 passenger while the CRJ-1000 goes up to 100 seats. The Bombardier C series CS100 seat up to 133. The higher operating cost versus its competitors and the fact that it was so high off the ground, requiring baggage lift machines to operate are the reasons it didn't do well in the market.
Because of the aircraft's high MTOW version, it has done somewhat better than Boeing's replacement for the 717... the 737-600 and it sold a few as a VIP jet and to a handful of airlines, including British Airways, which uses it out of City Airport in London, an airport which only allows regional jets.
You really should read up on the subject before commenting.
Let's say it depends on the definition. Capacity is one point, but range is one other. The A318 is capable of transatlantic flights after all. However the definitions most likely are about to change in the near future anyway, as the 737 MAX will be able to cross the pond as well AFAIK.
LCY allows only aircraft capable of steep approaches, which is not the same as regional aircraft - although most (or all?) of these meet that criterium.
I don't know about how you personally classify aircraft, but the airline industry classifies aircraft by maximum capacity. A Cessna Caravan can fly transatlantic. Range is a function of weight versus fuel burn and you can always increase your fuel tanks, which is what BA did with their A318s, which are actually technically 318 business jets. They have extra fuel tanks AND reduced weight AND still land in Shannon to refuel when west-bound. The A318, is not, by any means a "transatlantic" aircraft. On the other hand, you simply cannot fit more seats than the aircraft is designed for and have it certified. That's why it's the seat capacity that classifies aircraft and in every industry publication, you will see the market and aircraft classes being described by their seat number.
By the way, many regional jets and A318s cannot do steep approaches. BA had a few of their A318s reconfigured for this. There's an interesting article about the certification for the new CS100 you may want to read: atwonline.com/manufacturers/bombardier-completes-cs100-flight-between-london-city-new-york-jfk
The CS100 is specifically building the aircraft to be able to replace the A318s for the LCY to JFK route. The CS100 is the same size and capability as the A318.
I really like the looks of the sukhoi
SSJ-100 is a beauty to behold!
SSJ100 is smaller then a 737 and A320, so you can't really compare them. Still i really like the SSJ100, it's a nice plane.
My first choice would be the 737 then A320 and then SSJ100.
What about the new Bombardier jet?
Sembra una versione moderna dell'Airbus 319
+1 Yes nice video...ssj 100=arj 21-700 vs An 158 vs crj 900/1000 vs e-175 etc....
Because of Sukhois cooperation with Boeing, I would say that the SSJ is a nice successor for the 737-200/-500. Would be nice if there were more in western Europe.
What cooperation? Sukhoi is simply being advised by consultants from Boeing. There's no cooperation and it will never be a successor to the 737-200 or the 500 because there was a 600 series to do that AND A318 and they didn't sell well. Regional jets such as the CS series from Bombardier, E series from Embraer and the MRJ series from Mitsubishi will be servicing most of the world. Sukhoi can't get certification or ramp up production enough to satisfy any orders on time. They would also need better engines and a supply chain.
All planes looks great!:)
The SSJ 100 has a very narrow cabin. The Bombardier CS - the Bombardier CS has a 5-seats abreast configuration, just like the SSJ 100 - has a cabin that is more than 30cm wider than the cabin of the SSJ 100.
The A320 takes my top vote of all the narrow-bodies, except for the 757.
However I personally think it'd be more appropriate to compare a SSJ-100 to an CS-100.
AirbusFreak757 In that case the CS-100 would win as it is newer has more efficient engines
Vinayak Manoj Iyer Very true. Their engine used is very similar to the engine used on the A320neo (aka PW1000G), but a way different variant.
AirbusFreak757 I personally love the CS-300 and I'm exited knowing that Lufthansa ordered 15/30 of them , want to fly in that aircraft ASAP
Vinayak Manoj Iyer Lucky, I sure wish Alaska/Skywest ordered them instead of E170s to replace their aging CRJs.
+AirbusFreak757 can I remind you, that the airplane that sent 757 to the corner of the market was A321. A321's performance is worse than A320, but decisively better than B757 and carries the same number of passengers as the latter. Perhaps 757 has a kind of emotional value for you, as A310 for me, but I'd never say A310 is better than B767...
Sukhoi and boeing 737 almost have similar kind of looks and both aircrafts look amazing
With the price of either one airbus or 737, You can buy 2 superjet plus have spare money to make sure it will run without passenger for 1 year.
Already issues with them ... Russian junk.
that's what western aircraft manufacture want you to believe.
western propaganda everywere.... Well, people were talking like that about Embraer and now these brazilian babies are flying all around the globe. I dont think Sukhoi or Tupolev will have that kind of success, but they build great planes.
Sukhoi leased to your, I mean Indonesian company PT Sky Aviation SSJ100 at really favourable conditions, but not the airplanes were the reason why PT Sky bankrupted... The poor airplanes were abandoned in Batam and Surabaya for two years until Sukhoi restored them at their own cost and returned them back to Russia.
If you cannot run this business, even airplanes for free won't help you...
Valentin Apostolov should have leased the birds to Airasia. The carrier would fly them from Sabang to Marauke
Sukhoi is a very reputed and reliable company. Superjet is very beautifull.
Great video Javier !
Thanks!
:)
Hace poco hice el mismo vuelo en un B737 de Ryanair nuevo con solo 3 meses y en un A320 de Vueling tambien nuevo son solo mes y medio, los acabados interiores del airbus me parecieron mejores pero tengo que decir que el espacio entre asientos era mejor en el Boeing por lo demas ambos vuelan fenomenal muy comodos y sin apenas ruido interior.
I flew toMoscow on a 90 and it was very comfortable, professional crew (Aeroflot) and was very comfortable compared to 737 and 320 whose airlines crammed the seats together. It is a smaller aircraft for just such flights as mine. The stretched 737 and 320 are pushing out the 21's usefulness but if Russia is price competitive then maybe it will fill the Russian need for modern aircraft for longer, fuller flights.
How much SSJ100 stands out from the Boeing B 737 and the Airbus A320 around. Even the noise of this speaks in favor of the SSJ100. SSJ100 luxury aircraft. ))
Why compare the A320? The A320's engines can power two SSJ100s. The only comparisons would be the A318 and the 737-600 and they're not any louder than the SSJ100.
All planes looks Wooh! May be some architecture hidden attributes factors. I wonder why many commentators are biased about SSJ 100 cause only it's not common at there eyes
Believe it or not, the A320's exterior has the design of how the "REAL" average airplane looks like.
SSJ100 is new to the world but with the new engine the Russian came out with the new engine it will reduce the noise significantly although it's a new plane it has a great redundancy more than the Boeing and Airbus there is another one that's called MC 21 or something I had that's even better they got a long way to catch up my personal opinion they're all good they all go through the same pacification it is just one's personal preference
Learn how to use periods and commas.
hanief karim 😂😂😂😂😂
The Mexican operator Interjet has been reporting that interior noise levels are actually higher than on their A320s.
Engine without roar is shit.
Can't even come close to new Bombardier C Series
That Sukhoi is a virtual “rocket” taking off!!
The Sukhoi would be so much nicer and number one choice if it had winglets. Very nice aircraft, nicer than Boeing or Airbus. They should build the same a few size bigger. Well done Russians!
so what if they don't have winglets??? Winglets just add weight....
"just add weight"? Jesus dude, learn about wings, aerodynamics and lift before making moronic comments -_-
Simon Higgs I know all about winglets. But they are useless and make no different on short flights. Look it up.
Winglets
are set to reduce the dynamic resistance of the aircraft caused by air flow from the high pressure zone (under the wing) in the low pressure zone (above the wing). Dry solved this problem saving on weight when made wingtips rounded, so the air in the zone of the seal on the front of the wing moving along the wing sweep blows disturbed flow over the wing area, and the problem is solved without the dynamic resistance winglets. At the same time, aircraft have saved on weight and drag to performance improvement.
It's funny to read such comments. Sukhoi Design Bureau, as of today, is the best semilong in the world in the field of aerodynamics. You have the Su-30/35 put winglets offer ... Laugh.
No worries! Winglets are coming soon on SSJ! Though mainly for being inline with the fashion trend... We see, that even Airbus gave up the "Wingtip Fence" in favour of the "sharklets".
Happy Sukhoi SSJ 100 airplane that dashing dashing steady look good luck always and continue to work, greetings to all and thank Javier Rullan Ruano for his video
Thanks!
Sukhoi needs to engineer some overwing exits to help with passenger evacuation, in case of an emergency rendering either the forward pair of doors or the rearward pair of doors unuseable.
unfortunately there is no any indication of price for these plane. A320 - approx45 mEUR, B737-8 - 45-50 mUSD, SSJ-100 approx. - 20-25 mUSD.
+Yaroslav Zhukovsky Thanks for the info
No one can beat almighty A320!!
Nice footage,awesome birds...love them all!
Thanks!
Some "versus". You show some stock footage of the planes, give no information, no comparison, and lie and say it is a versus.. Another waste of minutes
Flughtglobal.com Mexican carrier Interjet has grounded 11 Sukhoi Superjet 100s with stabiliser defects pending repairs.
The aircraft were grounded after inspections of the 22 SSJ100s in Interjet’s fleet were completed on 27 December 2016, Mexico’s civil aviation authority says in a statement.
very good image quality !.. What camera are you using sir? sony ax1 may be?
+tufan oztel Thanks!, I use two cameras in this video, Panasonic Lumix FZ72 HD & Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 4K
top3good
1 a320
2 b737
3 ssj100
Sukhoi_SUPER,, jet, ssj_100 GREAT PIECE OF engineering and we will have it soon in may cantry Syria,, and Iraq and Egypt and, Algier
Ssj100 Boeingnosky
Nice video-Thank you!
+Dean Ainsworth Thanks!
I read that the Superjet 100 is using two engine manufacturer one is Pratt and Whitney and one Russian Jet engine manufacturer.
You can compare a SSJ to a Embarer 175 or 190, but not a 737 or a320. Not even close! Just look at the engine size diffrence!
all look lovely but I love the 737 is a classic and modern at the same time
i never seen before Russian commercial aircraft in real.I work at a private airlines.I only see Airbus,Boeing & old McDonnell Douglas.These aircraft Sukhoi or Topelov , i mean passenger carrier aircraft,are these aircraft costly so much?what about these aircraft operating system? I have question, as a pilot which aircraft do you prefer?Maintenance, fuel.......lLS system?
eso es muy bueno para todos la competencia mejora las cosas para todos, me gustaría que se comparar costos de adquisición, costos de mantenimiento, alcance , ruido, todas las especificaciones técnicas.
that is very good for all competition makes things better for all, I would like acquisition costs, maintenance costs, scope, comparing noise, all technical specifications.( Muy buen video)
El Sukhoi es muy original, completamente distinto, me gusta la pintura del morro
Indonesia 2012 berduka atas tragedi kecelakaan sukhoi jet 100 di gunung 🗻 salak Bogor 😭
Tau
It seems that the Ryannair Pilots didn't land the 737...thank goodness
1- Airbus320 (10+)
2- Boeing 737(9+)
3- Sukhoj 100(4+)
+Влад Ткач Необъективно сравнивать разные классы самолетов, тк Сухой является (!)региональным (RRJ-Russian Rejional Jet) самолетом и по идее его необходимо сравнивать с CRJ , Bombardierом , Embraerом . Как доказательство приведу характеристики вместимости машин:
B737- от 103 (B731) до 215(B739ER)
A320-100-200 (140 -180 )
SSJ(RRJ)-100 - до 108 (98 в базовой пассажиров)
также Сухой сильно уступает в дальности полета (3,5 т км против 5-ти) (с)Википедия
Boeing 737-600 and A318. All were designed for 100 passenger markets.
See upper! and google to help!)))))
Enriko Seas сухой это вообще гавно слепленое из импортных запчастей😂
Влад Ткач+ хрюкоед пакостный.
I don't mind ads, and I don't mind the odd buffer,
but when ads buffer, I suffer.
A320 is the best
Dominik Mystkowski a 320 And Boeing 737 are been medium plane, but SSJ100 is been regional plane, a 320 And b737 to not can compare Whith SSJ100
Sukhoi superjet 100 is better than many other regional aircrafts. Because :
#Design
#Range
& mostly the #Price.
Nice Video Bud.
+scotrail82 Thanks
Why are the wing edges flat for Sukhoi? Not upward curved? Lift reduced?
Hermoso SUKHOI... Genial...
In Russia, aircraft manufacturers call their companies the names of their founders, such as Ilyushin or Tupolev. Sukhoi is a surname
El 737 de Ryanair tiene unas aletas (cuatro a cada lado) justo a los lados del APU
¿Alguien sabe lo que son y para que sirven?
Gracias
Minuto 3' 26"
excellent video! What camera is that
+88hhe Thanks, it is a Panasonic Lumix FZ1000
What ever are the technical expects, which one is better, I can't say, but one thing I can say for sure SU-SSJ-100 is most beautiful in all. Of those lol
SSJ 100 vs Comac 919 vs A220?
amazing!
new subscriber earned :D
Thanks, welcome to my channel!
They aren't competitors, so I can't choose. The 737 is the world's most popular airplane, and can do anything from short hop to medium haul.
The A320 competes more with the CRJ & ERJ aircraft that serve smaller regional airports... It was designed to serve European destinations a few hundred km apart, and at that job it's quite good, but I can't imagine riding in one for the longer US & International routes..
Airbus 320 is not a regional jet
Thanks again that was awesome to see we love,,,, ssj 100 ,,Russian sukhoi it is the best way to flay
I really love A320 and 737 but I dont like Sukhoi ssj 100
3.Sukhoi ssj 100
2.Boeing 737
1.Airbus A320
Have you ever seen live Superjet 100? We fly it? ))))
Superjet-100 is a regional jet that has inside dimensions of medium-range aircraft. Many airlines in the world to buy the Superjet 100, precisely because it is one of the rare regional aircraft passenger cabin where the dimensions are equivalent to medium-haul aircraft.
You have to fly on a plant ATR-72, then on Embraer-190 and then on the Superjet-100, that's when you will be able to compare how good the Superjet-100. A-320 and 737 medium-haul aircraft is surprising that the author of the video is trying to compare them with the regional 100.
The representative of the Mexican airline InterJet who bought Superjet-100 said, "we bought the regional aircraft because of the medium-range passenger shifting her A-320 in the regional aircraft does not feel any difference in comfort in favor of the A-320."
Adorei seu vídeo Javier, parabéns 👏👏👏👏👏👏
Muito obrigado!
The SSJ 100 is beautiful but now the Airbus A220 has taken it's place.
The SuperJet 100 is a nice-looking airplane. How is it operationally?
Muito bom
parabéns pelo Vídeo
Sukhoi has got a good looking jet, but I would swap out the engines for something by Rolls-Royce, also where are the over the wing evacuation openings in case of emergency? There is only the front and the back to get out of the plane in case of emergency. How much is Sukhoi asking for one of these planes?
The ssj100 is like bringing a knife to a gunfight. Never heard of the company, and they will never compete with the big boys.
Never heard of Sukhoi? Really? Ever heard of Yakovlev... Mikoyand and Gurevich...Ilushin..?
Wiper on sukhoi first time to see it
737 for looks, A320 for comfort, sukhoi SU - 100 if I have a death wish
QUALITY !!!! QUALITY !!!! QUALITY !!!!!
B737: *Executes takeoff*
Also B737 one minute later: *Imma do what's called a pro gamer move, or a STALL.*
Hi Javier!
What camera did you use to record this video?
Panasonic Lumix FZ1000
Thank you!!
Russia ; Sukhoi : U.S.A ; Boeing 737 - 800 : FRANCE ; AIRBUS ; A- 320 ...................
Летал (в качестве пассажира) на всех трех, они все отличные, Airbus и Сухой оборудованы авионикой "Thales", имеют электродистанционную систему управления (Fly by wire), Boeing нет, но он и старше всех, просто модернизировался уже не однократно и лично я больше люблю 737 NG,
Boeing 737NG also use fly by wire systems (thrust control) and the flight controls are still electronic, although not technically "fly-by-wire", and Thales is just one company that makes avionics and there are better. Each airline has a choice of many avionics systems to install in their 737s. China Southern and China Eastern has ordered Thales for their 737s for example. I believe most 737s have been ordered with Honeywell, which are fantastic and exceptionally fitted for the 737.
To be completely fair, most modern aircraft utilize systems from multiple manufacturers, picking each system separately. The 787 uses a mostly Rockwell Collins flight deck and avionics suite, but the EFB is by Astronautics Corp. of America, the FMS, inertial nav, nav radios, the long-range radio altimeter, ADF, DME, crew info system/maintenance system, and the coms management systems are by Honeywell. The 737MAX will have a similar system that will also power the 777x, the new U.S. Air Force KC-46 tanker and the 757/767 avionics upgrades.
To the pilot, the differences between Thales, Rockwell Collins and Honeywell are very minor and usually no special training is required to switch from one to the other.
I like Aaj 100 more than the above 2..
1:01 wat a nice pilot waving !
I think they are all great aircraft.. it makes no sense in trying to rate one better than the other, becuase they all have there goods and bads..
See when the title says this aircraft vs that, I expect some insight and comparison, not just videos of them landing and taking off.
Que buen video!!!, en el Airbus y el Boing se ve en la parte trasera casi en la cola una pequeña compuerta abierta, alguien sabe que es y por que la llevan abierta mientras carretean?
The Boing and the Airbus have a small door in the tail, what's his funtion and why the small door is open while the airplane taxi?
+JohnPaH francot Gracias, creo que es un pequeño aliviadero, que cierran antes de iniciar el vuelo.
Hola:
Si te refieres a por ejemplo la que se ve en el minuto 1:45 eso es el APU, es una pequeña turbina que da energía al avión si tiene los motores apagadod, como por ejemplo en la puerta de embarque.
si no es eso, ¿podrias especificar el minuto en el que se ve?
Espero que te sirva de ayuda.
Aviación Online no, na pequeña puerta abierta 1,09
Aviación Online no, una pequeña puerta abierta que se ve en el minuto 1:09
Adorable SSJ 100
This is a plane should manufacture in the USA. It fills a large niche few planes now have.
the sukhoi was by far the loudest, I dont think to many american airports would like that.
I'm mot a pilot, engineer, or plane expert... but at 1:18, i was surprised to see the airbus with the friggin engine pylon in the way of the turbofan! Lol. That seems like an obvious disadvantage as far as thrust. Idk... perhaps someone could clarify the reason, or difference. To a layman. Thanks, nice video mate.
I prefer the Sukhoi or the 737. Airbus is not bad too
Are you sure that the SSJ100 is not that noisy with it sound?
it meets ICAO Chapter 4 standards.
you are not hear Tu-154)))) It's like a sound! Very nice sound! SSJ100 continuing the tradition!)
LOL tradition sound xD cool!
One week ago I flown in SU100 and I can tell you that it is better than Airbus. Even Boeing is quieter than Airbus.
Yeah these planes are great but why not an ultra long range jets like Boeing 777,747 airbus a380,a350. Or not most convent planes to buy like cessna 152,172,310, or even the 414?
I love the design of the Sukhoi. Shame it has so many issues…
The landing gear on thr ssj100 is out of the league, looks like something a airplane that weighs 4 times more would have.
Many smaller airports in Russia have less than ideal quality runways. Since the aircraft was designed for regional service, it was designed to operate out of such austere conditions.
No,no,no,no...You can't comparing the SSJ100 whith a320 or 737,cause it's regional jet.You can comparing this aircraft with regional and buisnes jets(CRJ700 etc.)
Sukhoi is small.
You made bad comparison.
Only Yakovlev Irkut MC21 stands as competitor with Airbus A320 Boeing 737.
May be also Tupolev 214 that stands near A321' 737-900 or 757
should've compared it with A318 rather than A320
I would die and I would not know that there is an airplane called Suckoi, which by the way is beautiful and very tasteful.
Probably been said before but at 1.19 it looks like a small flap is open by the rear door?
B737 and A320 are noisy at take off while MC21 is quieter!
if it says, Airbus on the side,
I ain't gonna to ride.
Ssj-100 is good plane but it is regeional jet. It can comporate with embraer e-family or bombardier c series
I like both Boeing and Airbus so here's the list:
1st: Boeing and Airbus
2nd: none
3rd: yea tha sukhoi
Magnificent
russians have been using winglets on the tu204 before boeing and airbus
good for them
Lie. The first Airbus to use winglets was the A310-300 in 1985. The first Boeing to use them was the 747-400, which also came out in 1985. The first Tu-204 flew in 1989. Even the A320 had fences in 1987.
not true. winglets was already testet on stols short after ww2. on passanger airplanes the first winglets was used on airbus 320-300(1982) your tu204 just come out 1989 firstflight