The Superjet 100 and Superjet 100 New are two completely different aircraft, except for the airframe itself. The new plane has replaced all imported equipment and even the engines. They are Russian.
The reality: All Russian civil aircraft (e.g. SJ 100, MC 21, TU-204 etc) have so far had significantly higher maintenance costs & downtimes than promised & than competitor aircraft. Therefore their world market share (outside Russia/Belarus/Cuba) is less than 0.1%. The situation with the Sukhoi Superjet 100 (SJ 100): Only 1 was sold in the last 5 years, over 60 were ‘in stock’ in 2020 because returned or not accepted.
Composite wings are built at Belfast (originally Bombardier`s Belfast but now owned by Spirit Aerosystems). Final Assembly Lines are located at Mirabel (Quebec) and Mobile (Alabama).
@@alexlo7708 ...and has invested in something that is proving to be utterly successful. Most of the debts were paid by the Canadian taxpayers. That is the sad part of the truth...
This is not a correct comparison, the SS 100 is a short-haul aircraft, while the A 220 is already a medium-haul aircraft. This can be seen in weight, fuel capacity, number of passengers, wingspan. The only thing they have in common is the 3+2 seat formula.
Версия SSJ-100 LR имеет коммерческую дальноть более 4 000 км... Однако, в России более популярны SSJ-100 B, с дальностью до 3 500 км, для полётов внутри страны и ближнее зарубежье...
The main problems with the SJ 100 were its unreliability & miserable after sales service (poor spare parts supply) and as a result too high operating costs. This led to the major western customers CityJet and Interjet returning their 45 SJ 100s. The major Russian customer Yamal Airlines also returned its. Fewer than 100 of the approx. 210 produced aircraft flew in 2019. The manufacturer recently announced that civilian aircraft will not be delivered in Russia again until 2026 at the earliest!
@@dagobertvignon1781 You are obviously ignoring the facts: 1) Several large buyers (Interjet, CityJet, Rusline, Yamal etc) returned their SJ100s and canceled the remaining orders. 2) The last 5 years there were hardly any orders, but tons of returns & non-acceptances. 3) In 2020, there were therefore 60 SJ100s that were not accepted and returned. 4) The reason for returns was mostly the excessive downtime and consequently high operating costs.
@@michaelvanallen6400 where are you getting this info from... interjet went bankrupt and returned them, Cityjet only had 5 super jets dont know where you got the rest of the information. Infact most of those airlines went under so they returned them... not because it was a bad airplane. The irony of all of this is that the SuperJet is all western electronics and engines . The SAM 146 is the exact same engine just de-tuned as a CFM56. ... It was only assembled in Russia. Regardless the main reson it did not sell is because its RUSSIAN that is it, Boeing and Airbus would never let anyone in. Infact the C series almost came to a halt when boeing tried to sue airbus.
@@SU95X The SSJ100 is a promising design. With a redesigned combustor for the SaM-146 and good customer support it will find some foreign customers. Boeing and Airbus do not decide what aircraft airlines purchase. Unless Russian manufacturers understand the importance of customer service they will not succeed.
Admiro a Rússia de Putin, conervadora, respeitadora da religiosidade, tecnologicamente avançada, um país gigante, ao contrário do ocidente, onde as drogas são privileligadas, a imoralidade e promiscuidade é aceita como normal, o capitalismo selvagem faz milhares de miseráveis. Mas isso vai acabar.
The difference is that the Russian plane crash is due to human error. Accidents (twice) of the American Boeing 737 max due to a technical design error.
Whoever produced or financed this video wants to give the impression that the two planes are both popular and comparable. The fact is, no one is buying this airplane outside of Russia (and even there it's being discontinued). From wikepedia: Yamal Airlines, the second-largest Russian SSJ operator, announced the cancellation of its order for 10 further SSJs, citing high servicing costs.[125] Of 30-40 SSJs owned by Aeroflot, only 10 are reportedly usable at a time due to maintenance problems.[126] Aeroflot cancelled approximately 50 Superjet flights in the week following the Flight 1492 accident.
You have outdated information. You have data on the Superjet 100 . Which has a high proportion of imported Western components. Today, a new Superjet airliner has been created . This is an airliner consisting of 100% Russian components. And there is a huge demand for it from Russian airlines.
How many have been produced and purchased? I wish them luck. Nice to have alternatives. But maybe Russian airline demand is due to their inability to buy from foreign suppliers. I don't wish Russia and Russians badly. I just don't enjoy misinformation.
@@markbrown2529 232 Sukhoi Superjet airliners were produced . 210 units have been delivered to airlines . Even before the sanctions, Superjet accounted for 60% of all domestic air traffic in Russia. So the Superjet was in demand among Russian airlines long before the ban on the supply of Boeing and Airbus.
@@юрийкосачев-э1э I see. Thanks for the info. I'll read more about it when I have time. Have Chinese airlines ordered any of these jets? Or any other foreign countries, excluding Belarus?
СРАВНЕНИЕ ВЕРНО... СТОИМОСТЬ ЭКСПЛУАТАЦИИ BMW (A220) БУДЕТ НАМНОГО ВЫШЕ LADA ( SJ-100), ОСОБЕННО В РОССИИ... РОССИЯ ОГРОМНА - ЗДЕСЬ ЕСТЬ КУДА ЛЕТАТЬ...
@@ИгорьИсаков-з4р Какая еще лада и бмв? Это самолеты по сути одного уровня. А в плане эксплуатации, на западе просто всё дороже, из-за курса и того что они деньги печатают намного быстрее нас.
@@ИгорьИсаков-з4р You are missed my point. If Sukhoi is using too much fuel it is an bad investment for airline company. Airbus and Boeing are competing in fuel economy. As you know quad jet is history.
@@henrikerdland578 You are primitive... For an efficient airliner, low operating costs are important... and not just low fuel consumption... PD-8 with a new low-emission combustion chamber, which makes it more efficient than SAM-146, from which PD-8 retained the “cold” part, developed and produced in Russia from the very beginning, with a relatively low bypass ratio. On short flights, where climb and descent, engines with a high bypass ratio do not have time to show their effectiveness. SJ-100 is an aircraft for short and medium routes. The aerodynamics of the wing and the aircraft as a whole are always an advantage of the Russian/Soviet school of aviation... besides, larger diameter engines have greater drag... Based on a combination of factors, the SJ-100 will have an advantage over the A-220 (C-S), especially in vast Russia, where aviation fuel is generally not expensive)))
@@ИгорьИсаков-з4р If I am primitive all aircraft manufacturers outside Russia are primitive. Russia cannot sell an airliner with a big fuel consumption outside Russia. Without international costumers the aircraft will end up being way too expensive. The reason fuel prices are so low in Russia is because of overproduction, and it will not last forever.
@@henrikerdland578 I was wrong... you are not primitive - YOU ARE ALSO AGGRESSIVE STUPIDITY...))) For the next 10-15 years, Russia faces the task of replacing all the Western rubbish from AIRBUS and BOEING... and this is more than 1000 aircraft... Taking into account the growth of the transportation market, both within the country and in friendly countries, more than 2,000 aircraft will be required. MS-21 and SJ-100 have no problems with the volume of orders. Russia is the most self-sufficient country... Aluminum, steel, titanium, composite components, all assemblies and even electronic components are produced here (not yet of the highest density, but sufficient!!!) The cost of components created in the country’s unified system is often an order of magnitude cheaper. .. Here is an example: the military budget of the United States and NATO is 20-25 times higher than the military budget of Russia... But Russia is the only country that can eliminate the United States and all the plebeians of the United States within 24 hours... having an absolute advantage in carriers and nuclear charges. .. ROSATOM is the absolute world leader in the nuclear industry ... and a manufacturer of composites (in particular for MS-21). The US and NATO system is ineffective - it has a HUGE CORRUPTION COMPONENT... It’s the same with airplanes and engines... PD-8, PD-14... PD-35 are excellent, reliable, economical engines, with low purchase and operating costs, which will ensure their future!
Canada cuts corners by using less material in structural design. They said their new aluminum alloy has enough strength even though being used less. Time will tell.
The Superjet 100 and Superjet 100 New are two completely different aircraft, except for the airframe itself. The new plane has replaced all imported equipment and even the engines. They are Russian.
So its a worse version I guess
@@TurboTigerDK1 Superjet's main problem was French engines. PD-8 will be better.
@@_Epsilon_ PD-14
Russian plane with Russian parts means it is more dangerous
@@Wqghfxz or may be much better
The reality: All Russian civil aircraft (e.g. SJ 100, MC 21, TU-204 etc) have so far had significantly higher maintenance costs & downtimes than promised & than competitor aircraft. Therefore their world market share (outside Russia/Belarus/Cuba) is less than 0.1%.
The situation with the Sukhoi Superjet 100 (SJ 100): Only 1 was sold in the last 5 years, over 60 were ‘in stock’ in 2020 because returned or not accepted.
One country vs 36 wow Europeans never fail to compete 👏 😅
Airbus A220 is not a European build plane , A220 is a Canadian build plane , originally Bombardier C-series . This plane is build in Mirabel, CANADA
The a220 was built by Bombardier Canada and isn’t assembled in Europe.
Right .. It’s mixed European and Canada but now named airbus A220
Composite wings are built at Belfast (originally Bombardier`s Belfast but now owned by Spirit Aerosystems). Final Assembly Lines are located at Mirabel (Quebec) and Mobile (Alabama).
@@DaveP-uv1ml Airbus paid 1 dime on purchase and billions on debt.
@@alexlo7708 ...and has invested in something that is proving to be utterly successful. Most of the debts were paid by the Canadian taxpayers. That is the sad part of the truth...
The wings are built in belfast you didnt research too well.
The important question is, are you flying from A to B safely? Both machines are safe. The cost of operation should be the problem of the airlines.
This is not a correct comparison, the SS 100 is a short-haul aircraft, while the A 220 is already a medium-haul aircraft. This can be seen in weight, fuel capacity, number of passengers, wingspan. The only thing they have in common is the 3+2 seat formula.
Версия SSJ-100 LR имеет коммерческую дальноть более 4 000 км... Однако, в России более популярны SSJ-100 B, с дальностью до 3 500 км, для полётов внутри страны и ближнее зарубежье...
C-S - пародия на SSJ-100😂
The extra range on the A220 is due to the extra 12 tons of fuel in the extra fuel tanks.....
These two aircrafts shouldn't be compared with each other. They serve different purpose. One is short haul. The other is a medium haul aircraft.
Good luck Russian manufacturing industries, more aircraft, more competitive markets
The main problems with the SJ 100 were its unreliability & miserable after sales service (poor spare parts supply) and as a result too high operating costs.
This led to the major western customers CityJet and Interjet returning their 45 SJ 100s. The major Russian customer Yamal Airlines also returned its.
Fewer than 100 of the approx. 210 produced aircraft flew in 2019.
The manufacturer recently announced that civilian aircraft will not be delivered in Russia again until 2026 at the earliest!
When you're anti-Russian, there's no point in making comparisons - you already know the result.
@@dagobertvignon1781 You are obviously ignoring the facts:
1) Several large buyers (Interjet, CityJet, Rusline, Yamal etc) returned their SJ100s and canceled the remaining orders. 2) The last 5 years there were hardly any orders, but tons of returns & non-acceptances. 3) In 2020, there were therefore 60 SJ100s that were not accepted and returned. 4) The reason for returns was mostly the excessive downtime and consequently high operating costs.
@@michaelvanallen6400 where are you getting this info from... interjet went bankrupt and returned them, Cityjet only had 5 super jets dont know where you got the rest of the information. Infact most of those airlines went under so they returned them... not because it was a bad airplane. The irony of all of this is that the SuperJet is all western electronics and engines . The SAM 146 is the exact same engine just de-tuned as a CFM56. ... It was only assembled in Russia. Regardless the main reson it did not sell is because its RUSSIAN that is it, Boeing and Airbus would never let anyone in. Infact the C series almost came to a halt when boeing tried to sue airbus.
Good luck if you finally get into one of the sukhoi @@dagobertvignon1781
@@SU95X
The SSJ100 is a promising design. With a redesigned combustor for the SaM-146 and good customer support it will find some foreign customers.
Boeing and Airbus do not decide what aircraft airlines purchase.
Unless Russian manufacturers understand the importance of customer service they will not succeed.
Admiro a Rússia de Putin, conervadora, respeitadora da religiosidade, tecnologicamente avançada, um país gigante, ao contrário do ocidente, onde as drogas são privileligadas, a imoralidade e promiscuidade é aceita como normal, o capitalismo selvagem faz milhares de miseráveis. Mas isso vai acabar.
Both Civilian Transportation Jet Plane Is Best , Event Have Difference Country Build , - Thanks All, .... Cheerio.*****.
Didn't Sukhoi have a commercial jet demonstrator fly into a mountain in Indonesia?
like 787 max does?
surely Salak incident was caused by human error, the plane itself was in good condition
The max 8 twice
Yes it was... and!?
The difference is that the Russian plane crash is due to human error. Accidents (twice) of the American Boeing 737 max due to a technical design error.
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺is best 👍👍
Good
For 3rd world countries, the Russian plane would be cheaper and better option than Boing & Airbus
Whoever produced or financed this video wants to give the impression that the two planes are both popular and comparable. The fact is, no one is buying this airplane outside of Russia (and even there it's being discontinued). From wikepedia: Yamal Airlines, the second-largest Russian SSJ operator, announced the cancellation of its order for 10 further SSJs, citing high servicing costs.[125] Of 30-40 SSJs owned by Aeroflot, only 10 are reportedly usable at a time due to maintenance problems.[126] Aeroflot cancelled approximately 50 Superjet flights in the week following the Flight 1492 accident.
ЭТО НАМНОГО ЛУЧШЕ, ЧЕМ 737MAX
You have outdated information. You have data on the Superjet 100 . Which has a high proportion of imported Western components. Today, a new Superjet airliner has been created . This is an airliner consisting of 100% Russian components. And there is a huge demand for it from Russian airlines.
How many have been produced and purchased? I wish them luck. Nice to have alternatives. But maybe Russian airline demand is due to their inability to buy from foreign suppliers. I don't wish Russia and Russians badly. I just don't enjoy misinformation.
@@markbrown2529 232 Sukhoi Superjet airliners were produced . 210 units have been delivered to airlines .
Even before the sanctions, Superjet accounted for 60% of all domestic air traffic in Russia. So the Superjet was in demand among Russian airlines long before the ban on the supply of Boeing and Airbus.
@@юрийкосачев-э1э I see. Thanks for the info. I'll read more about it when I have time. Have Chinese airlines ordered any of these jets? Or any other foreign countries, excluding Belarus?
When you're anti-Russian, there's no point in making comparisons - you already know the result.
And the fuel efficiency? I don't see curved wingtips with the SU which means 15% less fuel efficincy to start with.
Latest variants come with curved winglets
These are all shots of the old model.
New model:
watch?v=Nw1ug0hQxxM
1. ТЫ ГЛУП - ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТЬ ВИНГЛЕТ НЕ СТОЛЬ ВЫСОКА... 2. ВИНГЛЕТЫ НА SJ-100 ТАКИ ЕСТЬ... В ОТЛИЧИИ ОТ SSJ-100
😢 за Русия
Any comparison sj100 and comac arj21
This is like comparing BMW (A220) to LADA ( 100 superduper)
Get off your high horse. Boeing and Airbus had huge teams in Russia working for them especially on their widebody designs.
🤡
СРАВНЕНИЕ ВЕРНО... СТОИМОСТЬ ЭКСПЛУАТАЦИИ BMW (A220) БУДЕТ НАМНОГО ВЫШЕ LADA ( SJ-100), ОСОБЕННО В РОССИИ... РОССИЯ ОГРОМНА - ЗДЕСЬ ЕСТЬ КУДА ЛЕТАТЬ...
@@ИгорьИсаков-з4р Какая еще лада и бмв? Это самолеты по сути одного уровня. А в плане эксплуатации, на западе просто всё дороже, из-за курса и того что они деньги печатают намного быстрее нас.
cry nazi
you are missing fuel consumption
В РОССИИ НЕТ ДЕФИЦИТА АВИАЦИОННОГО КЕРОСИНА...
@@ИгорьИсаков-з4р You are missed my point.
If Sukhoi is using too much fuel it is an bad investment for airline company.
Airbus and Boeing are competing in fuel economy. As you know quad jet is history.
@@henrikerdland578 You are primitive... For an efficient airliner, low operating costs are important... and not just low fuel consumption...
PD-8 with a new low-emission combustion chamber, which makes it more efficient than SAM-146, from which PD-8 retained the “cold” part, developed and produced in Russia from the very beginning, with a relatively low bypass ratio. On short flights, where climb and descent, engines with a high bypass ratio do not have time to show their effectiveness. SJ-100 is an aircraft for short and medium routes.
The aerodynamics of the wing and the aircraft as a whole are always an advantage of the Russian/Soviet school of aviation... besides, larger diameter engines have greater drag...
Based on a combination of factors, the SJ-100 will have an advantage over the A-220 (C-S), especially in vast Russia, where aviation fuel is generally not expensive)))
@@ИгорьИсаков-з4р If I am primitive all aircraft manufacturers outside Russia are primitive. Russia cannot sell an airliner with a big fuel consumption outside Russia. Without international costumers the aircraft will end up being way too expensive.
The reason fuel prices are so low in Russia is because of overproduction, and it will not last forever.
@@henrikerdland578 I was wrong... you are not primitive - YOU ARE ALSO AGGRESSIVE STUPIDITY...))) For the next 10-15 years, Russia faces the task of replacing all the Western rubbish from AIRBUS and BOEING... and this is more than 1000 aircraft... Taking into account the growth of the transportation market, both within the country and in friendly countries, more than 2,000 aircraft will be required. MS-21 and SJ-100 have no problems with the volume of orders.
Russia is the most self-sufficient country... Aluminum, steel, titanium, composite components, all assemblies and even electronic components are produced here (not yet of the highest density, but sufficient!!!) The cost of components created in the country’s unified system is often an order of magnitude cheaper. ..
Here is an example: the military budget of the United States and NATO is 20-25 times higher than the military budget of Russia... But Russia is the only country that can eliminate the United States and all the plebeians of the United States within 24 hours... having an absolute advantage in carriers and nuclear charges. .. ROSATOM is the absolute world leader in the nuclear industry ... and a manufacturer of composites (in particular for MS-21).
The US and NATO system is ineffective - it has a HUGE CORRUPTION COMPONENT...
It’s the same with airplanes and engines... PD-8, PD-14... PD-35 are excellent, reliable, economical engines, with low purchase and operating costs, which will ensure their future!
Canada cuts corners by using less material in structural design. They said their new aluminum alloy has enough strength even though being used less. Time will tell.
you are spreading disinformation
I don't understand the purpose of your video. Is it just for politics?