Wait, The U.S didn’t lose Vietnam i signed a cease fire and left. And the U.S straight up left Afghanistan after whipping the Talibans ass for 20 years. They only took the country because america allowed it
@@pranavtiwari_yt bruh, it was never about conquest. It was about preventing the spread of communism, and you can clearly see today just how bad it went
@@kerbodynamicx472 Intelligence is the most important part of warfare. Denying the enemy knowledge while gaining it of your own can mean the difference in a tactical win and a devastating defeat.
@@kerbodynamicx472 it would be too naive to actually declare true expenditure when top 4 are nuclear superpowers ( which have their own uranium and plutonium mines )
@@corrosgamingyt9673 just by the defense budget you can’t guess how much tanks and warship a nation has (US spends a large portion of that on countless overseas bases), let alone where they are… Usually a country spends around 3-4% their GDP on military spending.
big budget spent poorly we need to invest in special ops they are way more effective against insurgents like nam and afghanistan and they have a budget smaller than the cost of 1 ford class carrier before the fucking planes ammo and helicopters
Over the past 80 years we've seen that winning or losing a war has less to do spending, and much more to do with who is in charge and making decisions at the top of the govenment in question.
Well you aren't lying tho Winston Churchill was never going to surrender in ww2 since they were alone and France already got invaded by Germany and Italy was with Germany so this made UKs situation worse
I just love how USA just slumps and "Sighs" before uttering his Military Expenditures Edit: When will I stop getting notifications of likes and replies? Holy shit
@@LSC69 USA's military spending is a by-product of the Cold war that was never resolved China's military spending come's as a direct precedent to challenge the US
@@Cobra-King3 China has 4x the population and much more hostile neighbors while the US has virtually an entire hemisphere to themselves surrounded by two oceans. It’s clear who actually needs to spend more on defense.
@@LSC69 Hostile neighbors, that China itself Actively provoked into sour relations I admit India and China has very tense relations, along with Japan and Korea, but what about the Philippines? Vietnam? Malaysia? Thailand? Nations that it knew starting a dispute with would cause problems on the world stage and harm them? Nations in S.E. Asia that has a combined GDP less that of China, Barely spend anything on Militaries, and then bully for a control of a Sea, This is proof that China has become the Asian Imperialist of Southeast Asia Nations that China NEEDS in a future war USA is a bad Policeman of the world, but it's better than China who was been flexing military muscle on Helpless Neighbors tell me, Who uses their Military Spending more on peace?
@@themackie2763 it's not only that, having a better military than every other power combined allows to abide no rules. Plus, the military complex is very profitable.
@@themackie2763 no need to invade, military spending doesn't only go to infantry and such, it goes to missiles and drones, like the missile attacks on serbia post-yugoslavia.
"How much were those sunglasses?" "$50 Billion" "But they're a necessary expense. I DIED" Edit: HOW DID THIS BLOW UP LIKE CRAZY AND BECOME MY MOST LIKED COMMENT
Indian and USA special forces were doing training in northern part of India(himalayas). One of the trainees, later said while being live online, that USA would carry one plane full of mineral water. The aim of the training was to simulate the war-like situations in wild.
Its important to note that the United States spends 3.7% of its GDP on its military (11% of all federal spending), while a country like Russia spends around 4.3 percent. We have the largest economy in the world, partially second to China, which is why we can afford to spend so much. But from a more compartive measure, there are nations that spend way way more of their money than the U.S
basically this video is only lookng at spending as a number of worth rather than a percentage which would make more sense ...finally someone with some common sense
Spend so much as we don't spend nearly enough. 3.7% is a joke. We should be spending at least what China is which is around 6.6%. Well that's only the official numbers but it's probably higher.
yea in India we spend about 2% of our GDP but still a lot more than most in overall figures. But in the US, privately owned arms companies are really big so a large portion of that money gets pumped right back into the economy. It also means you guys end up buying more expensive things (russian planes are made by state owned companies so theyre way more bang for buck) but on the other hand, you're pumping money right back to the people. In India, because we import most of our tech, that money ends up going to russia, france or israel... but I am sure as the newly permitted privately owned arms industry increases here our military spending will increase too.
Although you're correct there, once your military spending is comparable to other nations there's no ethical reason to continue spending more. The USAs comedically large military spending is a showing of their desired dominance over the rest of the world.
@@rightmunted7538 The huge U.S Military spending (Again, not the large in relative terms) is mostly due to its geographic position. There is no reasonable way to hold up our end of military treaties in Europe and Asia without a global strategic network. How will we protect our trade ships in the indo pacific? In the Mediterranean? How will he defend Korea? Taiwan? Europe? The only alternative would be isolationism and I see that as a regressive policy. Global trade and alliances are what keep globak peace.
technically if i remember right, the US didn't actually lose either of those wars, because peace treaties were signed. Same with the war of 1812, although all 3 examples are basically losses
USA : How did i spend more than $59 Billion?! China : How much were those sunglasses? USA : $50 Billion Remember guys, buying a sunglasses is easier than paying a taxes
Wouldn't be surprised if they literally spent that much on useless shit in the Afghan war, that sh*t's corrupt as hell, spending tens of thousands on a water bottle etc.
“With military like that you've surely never lost a war.” USA: *flashbacks on vietnam war* *flashbacks on almost every wars usa fought after ww2* *thx for 1k likes*
@@BoldzTheEpic. so... being an Indonesian know the diffirence between..... poland's flag and Indonesian's flag ? I am Indonesian too but i confused why there are no visible diffirence between poland flag and indoenesian flag. Edit : know i see the diffrence, indonesia flag just upside down poland flag. Indonesia have same flag with monaco not poland, i am so dumb at this that i forgot my own country's flag lol
funny fact i learned today right before the revolution in France the bottom 40% of people had 20% of the money in modern USA bottom 40% have 15% of the money so yea
American news and social media love Communist Vietnam so much now that you'd think they supported it to win instead. At least until Communist Vietnam displeases America and gets a regime change war like Muammar Gaddafi (that guy was leader of Libya for so long, I used to think he was untouchable).
@@Hugh.G.Rectionx Your ignorance is astounding if you think the US only won 1 war, I mean do you only exclusively listen to information and media and propaganda that makes the US look bad, because that's the only way you could have such a wrong opinion so confidently. Like where do you hear this stuff from? I'm genuinely curious, I want to know where all this crazy anti-American propaganda comes from, is it jealousy or is it being spread around campuses or what? Media? Where do you get this crazy shit about the US, when you obviously know nothing about it or its history? Why do you listen to such obviously biased sources? | Revolutionary War - Victory Barbary Wars - Victory War of 1812 - Tied White Peace (I'll fight you on this, both Canada/US established themselves as people to be taken seriously, US had victories including taking the Canadian capital and Canadians have victories including taking the US capital, considering the US succeeded in it's primary goal of stopping Impressment, where British kidnapped American sailors and force conscripted them to fight against our ally, an act of war, proving the British Started the war of 1812). Ok that rant is over, but I told you, I'll fight you with more facts if necessary, war of 1812, was a WHITE PEACE. Mexican-American War - Victory Spanish-American War - Victory WW1 - Sure we were late, but the British/French were very impressed with our capabilities. At first they thought we would be so inexperienced that we shouldn't have our own commanders, but successes from US pushes and the essential flood of extra manpower at the crucial end points of the war were important, sure France was MVP of WW1, but people underestimate America's contribution, even late, America helped secure the victory of WW1 and won its fair share of battles. So, Victory. WW2 - Massive Victory, while everyone else either lost most of their empires/infrastructure, or if you're Russian most of their population especially due to Stalin's idiocy, America dominated on front after front. Never before has anyone dominated on so many different fronts at once, never before had such a large concurrent army been raised (12 million concurrent, not same as overall). The US Lend Lease is the only reason the Soviets didn't get conquered during Barbarossa. These are facts, search them up if you want, without Lend Lease, all 3 key cities would have fallen, which would have meant the end of the Soviet Union, America saved the Soviet Union by risking its troops on the brutal Atlantic warfront. Then it defeated the Japanese Empire, nothing to be scoffed at, and then defeated the Italian Empire, something to scoff at, but still had a fair bit of troops and fought Germany in Italy, North Africa, France, and Germany. I believe America was the MVP of WW2, but either way, it definitly was a victory and the start of real American military power, and where many of America's greatest generals proved their intelligence and abilities. Korean War - Stalemate/White Peace. However, it is important to note that like WW2, the US was dominating at conventional warfare, because of this, Chinese/North Korean casualties were WAYYYYY higher than US/UN casualties, I think around 3x higher, so Americans basically got 3 Chinese for every American soldier dead. That's impressive and proves the US was the far more high-quality army in that situation, but didn't want to lose more troops in what had become a war of attrition. Vietnam War - Defeat. Hard to spin this one, only thing I will say is that the US won conventionally in South Vietnam for a while, but totally lost the Hearts and Minds campaign, had some embarrassments/horrible mistakes/choices in the Air War, and lost the overall war goals of the war, so overall, definitely a defeat. Just people need to recognize it wasn't a conventional defeat, but a guerilla one, and really only possible as the US was the aggressor against a fierce jungle-warfare defense. It's like Napoleon in Spain, definitely a defeat, but wherever Napoleon was he won the battles, even in Spain, just couldn't win the war that way. Gulf War - One of, if not the, most decisive conventional victory ever, Stormin Norman cut through Saddam's 4th strongest army on the planet like it was butter. From a military history perspective, Desert Storm is legendary, and deserves to be remember up there with the greatest military operations ever. Yugoslav Wars- Victory. Mostly NATO air force with it being mostly Croat victories on the ground, but still, a victory, as the US helped bring a swift end to a brutal war and most former Yugoslav members are now functional democracies part of NATO and EU. Panama Invasion - Victory, granted, hard to brag about such a one-sided fight, but still a victory. 2003 Iraq - Mostly a defeat, granted a conventional victory as Saddam was taken down, but considering the length of the conflict, the losses, and the fact that most of Iraq is under Iranian sphere of influence now, it was mostly a failure. However I suppose the further autonomy and freedom enjoyed by the Kurds is a positive, but that was probably countered by the amount of chaos caused by 2003, so overall, yah a failed intervention with faulty war goals in the first place. US-Afghanistan Intervention - Half-defeat half victory. This is fair, as the primary war goal was to take out the people who attacked the US, in that, NATO succeeded. The secondary war goal was to establish Afghanistan as a functional democracy, in that, NATO failed. So half-victory half-defeat seems fair to me on this one. Conventionally the US did way better than the Soviets in the initial fighting against the Tali, lost far less casualties overall, and caused WAYYYYY less civilian casualties than the Soviets did. All this proves that the US did fairly well in the mountain area in regards to combat, but mostly failed at the nation-building aspect of it. Counting that up, the US has only lost 2.5 wars over 240 years of warfare, that's not bad, especially considering it's losses were all Offensive Losses and the US itself took very little damage from these failures. These failures were mostly failures at successful nation-building in distant very different culture areas and hardly prove the US at inefficient at self-defense. How is that a poor military record? I'd say the Norman Invasion of England (or if you want more recently how close Germany came to conquering UK during WW2) and the Prussian and German invasions of France are more of a blot on British/French military records (very impressive records overall which is why I'm using them both as a comparison) than any mistake in US military history. The US's few failures barely affected it, while the failure to see the incoming blitzkrieg in WW2 was game-changing for history. I didn't even list every war, there's lots more American wars that ended in a victory for the US, so once again, how exactly does the US have a poor military record? Even the Civil War was militarily impressive to Europeans especially the use of Ironclads.
Poland: "You're surely never lost a war!" Also America: *loses a war to rice farmers* Edit: For everyone who is saying that it's not Poland, Poland's flag is usually flipped upside down in the country ball universe. Edit 2: Please stop telling me that it's Indonesia or Monaco, it's really annoying. I also explained it in the comment so there's your explanation.
@@lucasplayz680 yeah america was still a nascent nation at that time, but in the end the us and the british tied. The americans did put up a good fight as well as seen in battles like the battle of new orleans but the british was evidently dominant, hell they were fighting Napolean simultaneously during the war of 1812.
“Taxing the poor.” The poor don’t pay that much in taxes. Neither do the rich. It’s the middle class that is getting fucked by shouldering the tax burden for both ends if the spectrum.
Depends on how you define “much”. If both the rich and middle class are paying 10%, then the rich are paying more than middle class. Of course, there are more middle class people than rich people, but taxes are done and should be done on individual basis.
@@unknown3158 Agreed... maybe if governments would actually makes plans that lessened the budget, and therefore allowed politicians to make better plans to get their nations out of debt, perhaps the US wouldn't be over three trillion dollars in debt!
@@thomasecker9405 problem is even if the politicians got the chance to make good actual change it most likely wouldn't happen this is the problem with all forms of governments
Yep, the u.s. end up killing 2 million Vietcong, the loss of 56000. To anybody's eyes except for idiots, which is what most of this comment section is filled with, that is a complete military victory. Mind you the Senate pulling out for absolutely no reason. is entirely different story. Political loss not a military loss.
@@freddarau Killing civilians does not count. North vietnam invaded and successfully retained control of south vietnam despite US efforts, which is why it is considered that they won the war. The Nazis killed far more russians than the russians killed Nazis, but that does not mean the Nazis defeated the Soviet Union in war.
@@jusstinbarber look up the numbers yourself. About two million Vietcong and Chinese Fighters Were killed by the USA, 2 million civilians died as well, 500000 of which was United States and 1.5 million which was the Vietcong.
@@freddarau still lost, like you did to the taliban. Cant believe America with its 778 billion military expense lost twice to two groups of soldiers who cant even afford shoes. Maybe the russians can clean up your mess again.
"Youve surely never lost a war!" Usa: *vietnam war flashbacks*,*losing a war against rice farmers flashbacks* Edit: GOD NOW THERES A WAR IN THE REPLIES
Ik this is supposed to be a meme but Vietnam war started 10 years after WWII so USA was still recovering from the damages in WWII and we went against Russia in the Cold War 8 year years before Vietnam.
Both with Vietnam and afgan the wars were not lost because our military strength, the wars were lost to no clear objective. We could of completely destroyed communist vietnam which we did, we just never pushed into vietcong territory.
@jr41391 I'd say it's still a loss, but not a defeat. However, people act as though America was whopped by simpleton farmers with sticks, which isn't true. Vietnam suffered MILLIONS of deaths and injuries. The US dropped more bombs on Vietnam than were used in WW2. The US literally destroyed entire jungles with napalm and chemical agents. It was devastating.
@@Jake-rs9nq idk how its worse... america straight up left people of various kinds to die, AND 85 BILLION dollars worth of millitary equipment around(not exploded)... not to meantion the shitshow that insued literally a day later...
1:13 I love China’s reaction here, just like “You what mate!?” He was so proud of that 252 billion, and it still didn’t even come close to America’s spending 🤣😂
and the war of 1812 *teehee* and the alamo aaand the following Powder River Indian War. ... Red Cloud's War. ... Formosa Expedition (Paiwan War) ... Second Samoan War. ... Russian Civil War. ... Korean War. ... Bay of Pigs Invasion.
Poland: “So much money you surely never lost a war U.S.A” U.S.A: ….. 🇻🇳 Edit: When U.S.A fights a weak country U.S.A- Hoho…You dear challenge me?! (Country name) You know you can’t beat me (Country name)-I know I can’t but he can U.S.A-wait what? (Country name)- 🇻🇳 U.S.A-Oh fu- *Boss Music Starts To Play*
@@BoldzTheEpic. That's the Poland Countryball. It's inverted in the videos on this channel so it looks like Indonesia but it's actually Poland You have been typing the same thing in all threads related to Poland
For those wondering: Polandball is flipped upside-down. Which is why it looks like Indonesia. The big difference is the shade of red between Poland 🇵🇱 and Indonesia 🇮🇩
For those of you wondering what the hell happened in Vietnam and Afghanistan: If your choices are between "winning the war" and "NOT leaving the other country a radioactive hole in the ground" no amount of money in the universe will let you have both
@@rishabhbhatnagar9632 The US dropped more bombs on Vietnam than all the bombs used in WW2 *combined.* The US even tried chemical warfare, fireboming, and political revolution in neighboring nations. Only nukes would've stopped Vietnam.
"Or maybe taxing the poor" Actually, even with the numerous tax breaks and loopholes, the 1% of the us still pay 80% of all taxes. They just have so much money that even really slack rules still get more from them than from the other 99%
@Martin it’s just cause people are jealous. Trust me, if those same people became billionaires they would quickly be taking back all their ‘tax the rich’ statements.
@@NaThingSerious if were going at this seriously, bernie sanders is a millionaire, still complains about rich(er) people... same goes for AOC. the people saying "tax the rich" are usually the underinformed hypocrites, or wannabe politicians...
@@tormendor8585 why even built bases in unnecessary places that doesnt need any help, the US is just wasting money to "protect" country that would just be fine without anyone interfering
"With spending like that, surely you've never lost a war!" "Uh, depends on which part of "you" you mean. The soldier in me always win the battle. The politician in me... _blank stare._ "
Helps the taliban when the people the US fought for just crumpled like a god damn house of cards as soon as they left Should have given the weapons to the women. Thats who really are gonna suffer
@@podomuss the women wouldnt do shit with the weapons, they are untrained. Most likely they gonna just kill themself with them while trying to defend themself from taliban.
@Ralph they lost because they failed building the nation. The us stayed 20 years because when they left iraq for the second time it instantly went crazy and because of the fear it might happend the us stayed in afganistan. And aperantly the us didn't learn a thing from nation building in iraq
As a history reminder for all those making Vietnam War comments, the reason why the US left Vietnam was because the American people never wanted the war in the first place. As the war dragged on longer, they became even more pissed off that this already unpopular and needless war had dragged on for 20 years. Politicians were losing their jobs over it. So, in the interest of keeping their jobs, the US left. It wasn't for any lack of military might, it was because the Americans didn't want the war at all.
You're forgetting to add that the U.S., S. Vietnam, and N. Vietnam signed the Paris Peace Accords in Jan. 1973. An agreement for the U.S. to withdraw their forces while S. Vietnam took over military operations. N. Vietnam of course, violated the Accords 2 years later and invaded S. Vietnam with 300,000 troops when the U.S. military where longer there and the U.S. Congress flailed on additional funding for the S. Vietnamese Army to continue fighting. Prior to this, the SVA were winning just about every battle against NVA and Vietcong forces as long as they were supplied and funded.
@Nope Didn't you even read what I stated? Do even try to read & learn history? Where is your damn brains? The U.S. was already out of Vietnam by ending 1974. It was then fully under ths SVA government control. Did you even entertain that the S. Vietnamese really did want to be under N. Vietnamese and communist control? Did you even gave a thought that it was the N. Vietnam ALWAYS invading into S. Vietnam through out the entirety of the war and and again breaking the Paris Peace Accords? The U.S., SVA, and other allied forces not once had any ground offensives into N. Vietnam.
Poland: With a military like that you've surely never lost a war usa: well.... Vietnam: yo what ups bit- usa: I JUST LEFT I DIDNT LOSE VIETNAM: SAME THING
USA: “How did I spend more than 59 Billion!?” C:”How much were the sunglasses🕶 ?” USA *again* : …..50 billion. But they’re a necessary exspense. C: *sighs* Me: wtf China he doesn’t have eyes lol
Did you know we have a game? Check out COUNTRYBALLS: THE HEIST here! 👇
store.steampowered.com/app/1986290/Countryballs_The_Heist/
“You’ve surely never lost a war!”
*Vietnam flashbacks intensify*
*Afghan flashbacks intensify*
@@pranavtiwari_yt
The war was useless nevertheless. Just like the rest of the 100 wars America had.
Wait, The U.S didn’t lose Vietnam i signed a cease fire and left. And the U.S straight up left Afghanistan after whipping the Talibans ass for 20 years. They only took the country because america allowed it
@@pranavtiwari_yt bruh, it was never about conquest. It was about preventing the spread of communism, and you can clearly see today just how bad it went
@@mysitcowl4574 we would have won Korea if China hadn’t decided to step in. Though technically they had no choice
" The hat doesn't count comrade "
I lost it there
How do you have 344 likes but no comments
@@VICTORISAACBABIA Because it's litteraly just a sentence , you either agree with it and you like it , or you just ignore it
Ok 👌🏽
2 Lines, comrade. 2 Lines, comrade
@Dabbing mcgree Same I guess now they need to.
And remember people, this is only the publicly declared military spending. Imagine how much more these balls could be spending.
Why do you need to hide your defense budget?
@@kerbodynamicx472 Intelligence is the most important part of warfare. Denying the enemy knowledge while gaining it of your own can mean the difference in a tactical win and a devastating defeat.
@@kerbodynamicx472 it would be too naive to actually declare true expenditure when top 4 are nuclear superpowers ( which have their own uranium and plutonium mines )
@@corrosgamingyt9673 just by the defense budget you can’t guess how much tanks and warship a nation has (US spends a large portion of that on countless overseas bases), let alone where they are… Usually a country spends around 3-4% their GDP on military spending.
Bro the US definitely cracking 1 trill a year 😭
“With a military like that, you’re surely never lost a war!”
_dead. fucking. silence._
God that made me have a good wheeze
*"A good wheeze"*
nam
Russia also be losing to Japan, Finland, Afghanistan, and struggling with Ukraine 🤣
"with militarily like that, you've surely never lost a war!"
Stares blankly
LMFAO
Lol
But that was only a couple major wars, like Vietnam, the rest was won. The minor ones weren't a big deal or a big impact.
@@marirempalski5203 but that's the problem, USA beat pretty much everything yet still lose to a bunch of farmer literally XD
He got Vietnam War Flashback bruh
They spent 2 000 000 000 000 on one war and had to leave it behind
When Poland says to the us “You surely can’t lose a war with that”
Music stops and us says nothing…
Edit: HOLY COW THIS BLEW UP HEAPS
Darn ‘nam flashbacks
big budget spent poorly we need to invest in special ops they are way more effective against insurgents like nam and afghanistan and they have a budget smaller than the cost of 1 ford class carrier before the fucking planes ammo and helicopters
*Cough-cough* Afghanistan *cough*
🇻🇳🇦🇫
Shout out to vietnam for saying "f you" to china AND america
“With a military like that you have surely never lost a war!”
America: “yeah about that…..”
*internal ptsd screaming*
and America thinking about Nam war
VIETNAM
Ur mom
**realisation**
Over the past 80 years we've seen that winning or losing a war has less to do spending, and much more to do with who is in charge and making decisions at the top of the govenment in question.
***Over the span of human civilization
***Over the span of human civilization
@@akitoemery8651 you said that already lol
Well you aren't lying tho
Winston Churchill was never going to surrender in ww2 since they were alone and France already got invaded by Germany and Italy was with Germany so this made UKs situation worse
Meanwhile Lyndon B. Johnson Prolonged the Vietnam war and we were losing to rice farmers
I just love how USA just slumps and "Sighs" before uttering his Military Expenditures
Edit: When will I stop getting notifications of likes and replies? Holy shit
778,000,000,000
Yet somehow China is portrayed as the greatest threat to world peace smh
@@LSC69 USA's military spending is a by-product of the Cold war that was never resolved
China's military spending come's as a direct precedent to challenge the US
@@Cobra-King3 China has 4x the population and much more hostile neighbors while the US has virtually an entire hemisphere to themselves surrounded by two oceans. It’s clear who actually needs to spend more on defense.
@@LSC69 Hostile neighbors, that China itself Actively provoked into sour relations
I admit India and China has very tense relations, along with Japan and Korea, but what about the Philippines? Vietnam? Malaysia? Thailand?
Nations that it knew starting a dispute with would cause problems on the world stage and harm them? Nations in S.E. Asia that has a combined GDP less that of China, Barely spend anything on Militaries, and then bully for a control of a Sea, This is proof that China has become the Asian Imperialist of Southeast Asia
Nations that China NEEDS in a future war
USA is a bad Policeman of the world, but it's better than China who was been flexing military muscle on Helpless Neighbors
tell me, Who uses their Military Spending more on peace?
Idea: Countries ranked by children per families
China: 1
@@UNAF87 2 child policy
Somalia and Niger: *large*
Niger: Hello
I looked it up,Niger and Mali have the most
America when he's the largest: *ah yes, democracy*
i mean America has to spend that much because of it's allies not spending much.
@@themackie2763 it's not only that, having a better military than every other power combined allows to abide no rules. Plus, the military complex is very profitable.
@@urtuzuasteguireyesangelgab1602 well it’s not like you can just invade a country without facing tons of backlash, especially from your own citizens
@@themackie2763 o boy
@@themackie2763 no need to invade, military spending doesn't only go to infantry and such, it goes to missiles and drones, like the missile attacks on serbia post-yugoslavia.
“With a military like that you’ve never lost a war”
Vietnam: am I a joke to you?
Poland: "With a military like that you've surely never lost a war"
USA: *'Nam flashbacks*
And Afghanistan flashback too😂
Indonesia* 🇲🇨
@@milo_alstar vietnam
@@milo_alstar indonesia is colonized from dutch, english, portuguese,japan. Not america
@@milo_alstar that's Poland. It's upside down as a rule in countryball community
The Sunglasses were truly a necessary military expense
It actually was. Because if not he would be seen with no eyes.
"How much were those sunglasses?"
"$50 Billion"
"But they're a necessary expense.
I DIED"
Edit: HOW DID THIS BLOW UP LIKE CRAZY AND BECOME MY MOST LIKED COMMENT
Indian and USA special forces were doing training in northern part of India(himalayas). One of the trainees, later said while being live online, that USA would carry one plane full of mineral water.
The aim of the training was to simulate the war-like situations in wild.
@@rishabhjain7543 what does that have to do with the $50 billion dollar sunglasses?
@@marirempalski5203 don't know..
@@marirempalski5203 he maybe said that how those money is used...in always making this large military operational at all costs
@@marirempalski5203 it's an example about why the US military costs so much. They were supposed to simulate wild and they were carrying mineral water.
Its important to note that the United States spends 3.7% of its GDP on its military (11% of all federal spending), while a country like Russia spends around 4.3 percent. We have the largest economy in the world, partially second to China, which is why we can afford to spend so much. But from a more compartive measure, there are nations that spend way way more of their money than the U.S
basically this video is only lookng at spending as a number of worth rather than a percentage which would make more sense
...finally someone with some common sense
Spend so much as we don't spend nearly enough. 3.7% is a joke. We should be spending at least what China is which is around 6.6%. Well that's only the official numbers but it's probably higher.
yea in India we spend about 2% of our GDP but still a lot more than most in overall figures. But in the US, privately owned arms companies are really big so a large portion of that money gets pumped right back into the economy. It also means you guys end up buying more expensive things (russian planes are made by state owned companies so theyre way more bang for buck) but on the other hand, you're pumping money right back to the people. In India, because we import most of our tech, that money ends up going to russia, france or israel... but I am sure as the newly permitted privately owned arms industry increases here our military spending will increase too.
Although you're correct there, once your military spending is comparable to other nations there's no ethical reason to continue spending more. The USAs comedically large military spending is a showing of their desired dominance over the rest of the world.
@@rightmunted7538 The huge U.S Military spending (Again, not the large in relative terms) is mostly due to its geographic position. There is no reasonable way to hold up our end of military treaties in Europe and Asia without a global strategic network.
How will we protect our trade ships in the indo pacific? In the Mediterranean? How will he defend Korea? Taiwan? Europe?
The only alternative would be isolationism and I see that as a regressive policy. Global trade and alliances are what keep globak peace.
Poland: You must have never lost a war, right?
Vietnam and Afghanistan: *Allow us to introduce ourselves*
that's Indonesia not Poland
@@mrdictator7030 really I too got it as poland.
@@kamalsidhu7454 not bro Indonesia
@@emotebatu100tahunyanglalu3 okk
technically if i remember right, the US didn't actually lose either of those wars, because peace treaties were signed. Same with the war of 1812, although all 3 examples are basically losses
USA : How did i spend more than $59 Billion?!
China : How much were those sunglasses?
USA : $50 Billion
Remember guys, buying a sunglasses is easier than paying a taxes
Wouldn't be surprised if they literally spent that much on useless shit in the Afghan war, that sh*t's corrupt as hell, spending tens of thousands on a water bottle etc.
@@崔莱 aparently the US Spent 2.3 trillion on thw war
Suppose to be funny?
@@babukajimaharjan2299 maybe
50 billion is a drop in the bucket. Anything less than a trillion is being stingy.
“With military like that you've surely never lost a war.”
USA: *flashbacks on vietnam war*
*flashbacks on almost every wars usa fought after ww2*
*thx for 1k likes*
and Afghanistan.
@@CenturionAlexander and Korea
@@francescoboselli6033 Korea was a stalemate
Exactly.
Korea isn’t finished yet
“Surely you never lost a war”
… total silence.
Earned a sub there, mate. 👍🏻😂
"You surely can't lose a war with that"
Vietnam and Afghanistan: "Are we a joke to you?"
To be fair Afghanistan is literally built to be a fortress Soviets and british empire also lost to it so I say its history repeating itself
They are jokes to us. Big fat American jokes
Because America has never lost a war
@@KA-tu2em the war of 1812, Korean war, Vietnam, and Afghanistan
@@tristanpflughoft8911 1812 indecisive, Korean never ended, Vietnamese Technically we left before the war ended, can’t argue about Afghan though
@@Orange20Car leaving is losing. 1812 is considered a loss because we failed to annex Canada.
That pause in the music when Poland says "you surely never lost a war" is just amazing
bruh its indonesia not poland
@@BoldzTheEpic. they both almost have the same flag somehow. But i think that's poland.
@@BoldzTheEpic. ok... they are using the Indonesian flag for Poland ball, not sure why but it could be confusion.
@@michaeljonathan9715 no it isnt actually because im indonesian
@@BoldzTheEpic. so... being an Indonesian know the diffirence between..... poland's flag and Indonesian's flag ?
I am Indonesian too but i confused why there are no visible diffirence between poland flag and indoenesian flag.
Edit : know i see the diffrence, indonesia flag just upside down poland flag. Indonesia have same flag with monaco not poland, i am so dumb at this that i forgot my own country's flag lol
"Money printer" and "taxing the poor" - America's economy in nutshell.
Really only the first bit, but pretty much.
funny fact i learned today right before the revolution in France the bottom 40% of people had 20% of the money in modern USA bottom 40% have 15% of the money so yea
Nah chief we’re the biggest arms sellers in the world which isn’t good either hmm😐
@@colefahie9784 we also have the largest consumer market where most of our wealth comes from
@@louisianaman2025 source? your ass?
0:11 haha cute USA 😂 Love from India
“You sure never lost a war!”
The Vietnamese: “You sure?”
Afghanistan and Iraq in the background: "Are you sure about that?"
That’s why you send troops to war. Just give the equipment to someone else
@@totti-wb3yc Meanwhile 1812 Canada and UK be like: Don't forget about us!
You talking about china or vietnamese
Iraqis, Syrians, Afghans, etc: "Yeah.... You sure?"
Poland: you surely havent lost a war
Vietnam: *Hello.*
Afghanistan has joined the chat
Afghanistan: *Gutentag*
Iraq: I am here
@@dominusnoobus1589 no Afghanistan be like Assalam Valeekum
@@blood_trail_lover731 Canada has entered the chat
Wow, haven’t watched the video yet but based on the thumbnail I didn’t know Poland was such a military powerhouse!
i- i dont think thats poland..
@Britannia the almighty monegasque army
That Is USA
@@leafsilvery It can be Poland countryball version
They’d have to be, considering its history with its neighbors…
*cough cough* wwii *cough cough*
Everyone: Poland🇵🇱
Cultured people: Indonesia 🇮🇩
People who know how poland is depicted in countryballs: *_poland_* 🇵🇱
"With military like that, you've surely never lost a war!"
America: **Vietnam Flashbacks**
why not the most recent one? Afghanistan :D
@@NoobGaming-yc6sr Iraq, korean war, 1812, etc
American news and social media love Communist Vietnam so much now that you'd think they supported it to win instead. At least until Communist Vietnam displeases America and gets a regime change war like Muammar Gaddafi
(that guy was leader of Libya for so long, I used to think he was untouchable).
Afghanistan, China: What did you say?
Tritium idk
1:18 - Poland: you'll never lose a war!
USA - *vietnam flashbacks from April 1975*
Also losing Afghanistan.
I'm from Vietnam and I was thinking of commenting on that
I think pwa was trying to flatter the US... Or is he simply an American
@@ToiLaChinhMinh He's not american, check about page, he's from new zealand
@@AnderJaxi That's why he Let Taliban attack Afghanistan
@@ToiLaChinhMinh no I think he was being sarcastic
Australia: i’m glad to be taking down the Taliban for freedom USA: wait we’re doing this for freedom?
That’s from comic on r/polandball
And yet Australia recently committed war crimes against a bunch of civilians
@@randomeastasian347 who hasn't lol
@@taylormatthews6086 not that funny, to many civilians die in wars that aren't theirs, still I get the joke
@@themrlupo3591 Yea it's not funny when people murder😢
I am satisfied at how adorable our Canadian army is eh
Quiet submissive and breedable
@@coldeed that would be the US army give that theyve only ever won 1 war on their own, against mexico.
@@Hugh.G.Rectionx found the leaf
Would love to kiss em 😩
@@Hugh.G.Rectionx Your ignorance is astounding if you think the US only won 1 war, I mean do you only exclusively listen to information and media and propaganda that makes the US look bad, because that's the only way you could have such a wrong opinion so confidently. Like where do you hear this stuff from? I'm genuinely curious, I want to know where all this crazy anti-American propaganda comes from, is it jealousy or is it being spread around campuses or what? Media? Where do you get this crazy shit about the US, when you obviously know nothing about it or its history? Why do you listen to such obviously biased sources?
|
Revolutionary War - Victory
Barbary Wars - Victory
War of 1812 - Tied White Peace (I'll fight you on this, both Canada/US established themselves as people to be taken seriously, US had victories including taking the Canadian capital and Canadians have victories including taking the US capital, considering the US succeeded in it's primary goal of stopping Impressment, where British kidnapped American sailors and force conscripted them to fight against our ally, an act of war, proving the British Started the war of 1812). Ok that rant is over, but I told you, I'll fight you with more facts if necessary, war of 1812, was a WHITE PEACE.
Mexican-American War - Victory
Spanish-American War - Victory
WW1 - Sure we were late, but the British/French were very impressed with our capabilities. At first they thought we would be so inexperienced that we shouldn't have our own commanders, but successes from US pushes and the essential flood of extra manpower at the crucial end points of the war were important, sure France was MVP of WW1, but people underestimate America's contribution, even late, America helped secure the victory of WW1 and won its fair share of battles. So, Victory.
WW2 - Massive Victory, while everyone else either lost most of their empires/infrastructure, or if you're Russian most of their population especially due to Stalin's idiocy, America dominated on front after front. Never before has anyone dominated on so many different fronts at once, never before had such a large concurrent army been raised (12 million concurrent, not same as overall). The US Lend Lease is the only reason the Soviets didn't get conquered during Barbarossa. These are facts, search them up if you want, without Lend Lease, all 3 key cities would have fallen, which would have meant the end of the Soviet Union, America saved the Soviet Union by risking its troops on the brutal Atlantic warfront. Then it defeated the Japanese Empire, nothing to be scoffed at, and then defeated the Italian Empire, something to scoff at, but still had a fair bit of troops and fought Germany in Italy, North Africa, France, and Germany. I believe America was the MVP of WW2, but either way, it definitly was a victory and the start of real American military power, and where many of America's greatest generals proved their intelligence and abilities.
Korean War - Stalemate/White Peace. However, it is important to note that like WW2, the US was dominating at conventional warfare, because of this, Chinese/North Korean casualties were WAYYYYY higher than US/UN casualties, I think around 3x higher, so Americans basically got 3 Chinese for every American soldier dead. That's impressive and proves the US was the far more high-quality army in that situation, but didn't want to lose more troops in what had become a war of attrition.
Vietnam War - Defeat. Hard to spin this one, only thing I will say is that the US won conventionally in South Vietnam for a while, but totally lost the Hearts and Minds campaign, had some embarrassments/horrible mistakes/choices in the Air War, and lost the overall war goals of the war, so overall, definitely a defeat. Just people need to recognize it wasn't a conventional defeat, but a guerilla one, and really only possible as the US was the aggressor against a fierce jungle-warfare defense. It's like Napoleon in Spain, definitely a defeat, but wherever Napoleon was he won the battles, even in Spain, just couldn't win the war that way.
Gulf War - One of, if not the, most decisive conventional victory ever, Stormin Norman cut through Saddam's 4th strongest army on the planet like it was butter. From a military history perspective, Desert Storm is legendary, and deserves to be remember up there with the greatest military operations ever.
Yugoslav Wars- Victory. Mostly NATO air force with it being mostly Croat victories on the ground, but still, a victory, as the US helped bring a swift end to a brutal war and most former Yugoslav members are now functional democracies part of NATO and EU.
Panama Invasion - Victory, granted, hard to brag about such a one-sided fight, but still a victory.
2003 Iraq - Mostly a defeat, granted a conventional victory as Saddam was taken down, but considering the length of the conflict, the losses, and the fact that most of Iraq is under Iranian sphere of influence now, it was mostly a failure. However I suppose the further autonomy and freedom enjoyed by the Kurds is a positive, but that was probably countered by the amount of chaos caused by 2003, so overall, yah a failed intervention with faulty war goals in the first place.
US-Afghanistan Intervention - Half-defeat half victory. This is fair, as the primary war goal was to take out the people who attacked the US, in that, NATO succeeded. The secondary war goal was to establish Afghanistan as a functional democracy, in that, NATO failed. So half-victory half-defeat seems fair to me on this one. Conventionally the US did way better than the Soviets in the initial fighting against the Tali, lost far less casualties overall, and caused WAYYYYY less civilian casualties than the Soviets did. All this proves that the US did fairly well in the mountain area in regards to combat, but mostly failed at the nation-building aspect of it.
Counting that up, the US has only lost 2.5 wars over 240 years of warfare, that's not bad, especially considering it's losses were all Offensive Losses and the US itself took very little damage from these failures. These failures were mostly failures at successful nation-building in distant very different culture areas and hardly prove the US at inefficient at self-defense. How is that a poor military record? I'd say the Norman Invasion of England (or if you want more recently how close Germany came to conquering UK during WW2) and the Prussian and German invasions of France are more of a blot on British/French military records (very impressive records overall which is why I'm using them both as a comparison) than any mistake in US military history. The US's few failures barely affected it, while the failure to see the incoming blitzkrieg in WW2 was game-changing for history. I didn't even list every war, there's lots more American wars that ended in a victory for the US, so once again, how exactly does the US have a poor military record? Even the Civil War was militarily impressive to Europeans especially the use of Ironclads.
0:23 that's the only time I've seen Canada angry
Poland: "You're surely never lost a war!"
Also America: *loses a war to rice farmers*
Edit: For everyone who is saying that it's not Poland, Poland's flag is usually flipped upside down in the country ball universe.
Edit 2: Please stop telling me that it's Indonesia or Monaco, it's really annoying. I also explained it in the comment so there's your explanation.
Poland?
Poland????
@@Putra_Kun No its Vietnam
Wow my country is poland now
@@ellectrodafi1317 lol
“You’ve Surely Never Lost A War!”
Afghanistan war be like:
you forgot about me.
Vietnam War: *ahem ahem*
Irak too
@@feelingnether158 nah they win the iraq
@@selahattinkaskc8668 500 000 kids killed because of that war. Its a total lost.
@@feelingnether158 so?
Poland : "You surely can't lose a war with that!"
USA: *Vietnam flashbacks*
plus the brand new
*Afghanistan flashbacks*
Why Afghanistan???
well its indonesia not poland tho-
@@ree9071 it Is Poland
The top 5 :
1. USA 🇺🇸
2. China 🇨🇳
3. India 🇮🇳
4. Russia 🇷🇺
5. Britain 🇬🇧
Uk is now 4th since we put an extra 16 billion to defence
Poland should be getting 1 tril from Germany due to the war so Poland may be getting stronger
@@patrickk9956 what war??
@🇵🇪José Salazar Vargas🇵🇪 it can at this rate with Biden ruining the us
What about Poland?
Poland: "with a military like dat u surely never lost a war"
America: *intense reflection*
To be fair to the US, they did win the battles in Vietnam and Afghanistan, but of course politics had to dabble in and ruin everything.
@@TybarSake 1812?
@@lucasplayz680 that was before the US put military spending into full swing
@@lucasplayz680 yeah america was still a nascent nation at that time, but in the end the us and the british tied. The americans did put up a good fight as well as seen in battles like the battle of new orleans but the british was evidently dominant, hell they were fighting Napolean simultaneously during the war of 1812.
why tf polandball is always upside down
“Taxing the poor.” The poor don’t pay that much in taxes. Neither do the rich. It’s the middle class that is getting fucked by shouldering the tax burden for both ends if the spectrum.
As well as the fact that the rich 1% already pay nearly 98% of the national income tax...
Depends on how you define “much”. If both the rich and middle class are paying 10%, then the rich are paying more than middle class. Of course, there are more middle class people than rich people, but taxes are done and should be done on individual basis.
@@unknown3158 Agreed... maybe if governments would actually makes plans that lessened the budget, and therefore allowed politicians to make better plans to get their nations out of debt, perhaps the US wouldn't be over three trillion dollars in debt!
@@thomasecker9405 problem is even if the politicians got the chance to make good actual change it most likely wouldn't happen this is the problem with all forms of governments
@@galaxy-eyy4081 With so much bureaucracy, yeah, I can see how such changes could get lost...
"Never Lost a war"
Not in the military way, but in the political way lost by the cost of trillions of dollars
Yep, the u.s. end up killing 2 million Vietcong, the loss of 56000. To anybody's eyes except for idiots, which is what most of this comment section is filled with, that is a complete military victory. Mind you the Senate pulling out for absolutely no reason. is entirely different story. Political loss not a military loss.
@@freddarau Killing civilians does not count. North vietnam invaded and successfully retained control of south vietnam despite US efforts, which is why it is considered that they won the war. The Nazis killed far more russians than the russians killed Nazis, but that does not mean the Nazis defeated the Soviet Union in war.
@@jusstinbarber look up the numbers yourself. About two million Vietcong and Chinese Fighters Were killed by the USA, 2 million civilians died as well, 500000 of which was United States and 1.5 million which was the Vietcong.
@@freddarau still lost, like you did to the taliban. Cant believe America with its 778 billion military expense lost twice to two groups of soldiers who cant even afford shoes. Maybe the russians can clean up your mess again.
@@jusstinbarber south vietnam fell 2 years after America left, and its hard to fight people that use children as grenades lmao
"with a military like that, you surely never lost a war!"
canada and united states: *angrily staring at poland, and eachother*
1812?
@@penelope57 1812 indeed.
balllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllls
its indonesia not poland btw
@@BoldzTheEpic. you are cringe, poland is like that in polandball / countryball, purposefully.
"Youve surely never lost a war!"
Usa: *vietnam war flashbacks*,*losing a war against rice farmers flashbacks*
Edit: GOD NOW THERES A WAR IN THE REPLIES
Afghanistan on its way
Ik this is supposed to be a meme but Vietnam war started 10 years after WWII so USA was still recovering from the damages in WWII and we went against Russia in the Cold War 8 year years before Vietnam.
Both with Vietnam and afgan the wars were not lost because our military strength, the wars were lost to no clear objective. We could of completely destroyed communist vietnam which we did, we just never pushed into vietcong territory.
Korean War？
@@m-1173 what about it
DAILY UPLOADS COMING SOON!
Subscribe to be notified!
(:
yes
4th
Awesome
GIVE PORTUGAL SOME LOVE - > 🇵🇹
0:47 China: "Where did you even get your money?"
USA: "From your slave labour"
“surely you never lost a war with that many soldiers!”
oh poland it seems you never see the vietnam war
I think that's the joke
ik lol
啊这（Laughed out of Chinese
I’m from Vietnam and this is funny I must say
And cuba
"With power like that, you've surely never lost a war!"
*Vietnam Flashbacks Intensifies*
@jr41391 I'd say it's still a loss, but not a defeat. However, people act as though America was whopped by simpleton farmers with sticks, which isn't true.
Vietnam suffered MILLIONS of deaths and injuries. The US dropped more bombs on Vietnam than were used in WW2. The US literally destroyed entire jungles with napalm and chemical agents. It was devastating.
i assume you forgot the colossal 20 year fuckup that was the war with afghanistan?
@@crustybomb115 Vietnam was much worse so it's a better example.
@@Jake-rs9nq idk how its worse... america straight up left people of various kinds to die, AND 85 BILLION dollars worth of millitary equipment around(not exploded)... not to meantion the shitshow that insued literally a day later...
1:13 I love China’s reaction here, just like “You what mate!?”
He was so proud of that 252 billion, and it still didn’t even come close to America’s spending 🤣😂
花费更多军费是一件值得炫耀的事情吗
@@jeanmunoz6953 这些鲨臂已经魔怔了
Give them a few more years and they will probably spend more than US
@@jeanmunoz6953 我觉得写这条评论的人其实是在讽刺美国
Yeah you probably missed the last line
Everyone talks about the US loosing in Vietnam, but yall forget afganistan
and the war of 1812 *teehee*
and the alamo
aaand the following
Powder River Indian War. ...
Red Cloud's War. ...
Formosa Expedition (Paiwan War) ...
Second Samoan War. ...
Russian Civil War. ...
Korean War. ...
Bay of Pigs Invasion.
Korean War is not finished so
@@drkclshr well I mean korea wasn't fully lost to communism like vietnam so I wouldn't really say it was a loss or victory
@@countsnowyofgwainn3996 the Korean War wasn’t a loss, 1812 was a stalemate, and bay of pigs wasn’t a war, rest is true tho
half of these weren't wars, and the Korean war was a stalemate, not a loss.
Poland: “So much money you surely never lost a war U.S.A”
U.S.A: ….. 🇻🇳
Edit:
When U.S.A fights a weak country
U.S.A- Hoho…You dear challenge me?! (Country name) You know you can’t beat me
(Country name)-I know I can’t but he can
U.S.A-wait what?
(Country name)- 🇻🇳
U.S.A-Oh fu-
*Boss Music Starts To Play*
Its indonesia not poland
🇦🇫🇨🇦🇰🇷
@@BoldzTheEpic. That's the Poland Countryball.
It's inverted in the videos on this channel so it looks like Indonesia but it's actually Poland
You have been typing the same thing in all threads related to Poland
We ripped ourselves apart in that war, the vietcong never stood a chance
@@BoldzTheEpic. it's poland not indo idiot
Switzerland & Iceland: *you fools, I have the strongest weapon, peace.*
Peace that's secured by others
"with militarily like that, you've surely never lost a war!"
Afghanistan(The grave yard of empires) : Are you sure about that?
😂
wait what battle did America lost from Afghanistan ?
@@beyondhumanrange6196 talebani war in Afghanistan
afgahnaistan more like door mat of empires .
We left afghan sh!thole because there was no profit there anymore.
i laughed out loud when Poland said "with a military like that surely you've never lost a war."
I thought it was Indonesia not Poland
For those wondering: Polandball is flipped upside-down. Which is why it looks like Indonesia. The big difference is the shade of red between Poland 🇵🇱 and Indonesia 🇮🇩
Yeah but it is way more likely indonesia cause Indonesia Has bigger military than poland so yeah
Monaco and Indonesia have exact same flag. 😂
@@VoltzV1 No? When it comes to spending, poland is higher on the list lol.
Poland: With military like that, you've surely never lost a war!
Damn Poland, you didn't have to murder them like that...
Well, we tenically didn't declare war on Afghanistan or Vietnam so...
Does that murder count as another lost war ?
@@blede8649 a war that wasn't declared?
@@ADMICKEY Well, if a ball murders another ball, I think that should count as a war, right ?
@@blede8649 well, yes
For those of you wondering what the hell happened in Vietnam and Afghanistan:
If your choices are between "winning the war" and "NOT leaving the other country a radioactive hole in the ground" no amount of money in the universe will let you have both
Not unless you're planning on staying.
Nuke isnt the only thing.
@@rishabhbhatnagar9632 The US dropped more bombs on Vietnam than all the bombs used in WW2 *combined.* The US even tried chemical warfare, fireboming, and political revolution in neighboring nations. Only nukes would've stopped Vietnam.
"You surely can't lose a war with that"
(* Noticed some trees talking in Vietnamese)
Yesn't
Modi 🎈🎈😎
Mudi
@@brat9100 Show some respect.
@@brat9100 uttarakhand mai chai nhi mil rhi majak kr rha hai kya?
@@brat9100 kuch kam karo eisa Neeraj chopra jeisa to PM Modi tumhe bhi zarur chai pilayega
"With a military like that you've surely never lost a war."
Canada, Britain, Vietnam, North Korea, Cuba: Are you sure about that?
Poland: With that army you surely never lost a war
America: *Vietnam Flashbacks*
Afganistan flashbacks
I got condused first country flag are Indonesia or Monaco or Poland?
@@ungket5846 Its reverse Poland flag, cuz Polandball meme
@@ungket5846 Why did u write Poland with small letter?
@@sonamadik3851 sorry typo
0:41 i hear the russian accent out of nowhere
“You’ve surely never lost a war!”
USA: you’d be surprised
"Or maybe taxing the poor"
Actually, even with the numerous tax breaks and loopholes, the 1% of the us still pay 80% of all taxes. They just have so much money that even really slack rules still get more from them than from the other 99%
@Martin it’s just cause people are jealous. Trust me, if those same people became billionaires they would quickly be taking back all their ‘tax the rich’ statements.
@@NaThingSerious if were going at this seriously, bernie sanders is a millionaire, still complains about rich(er) people... same goes for AOC. the people saying "tax the rich" are usually the underinformed hypocrites, or wannabe politicians...
The silent pause was amazing, and represents almost the whole history after ww2
they were losing wars they started way before 2WW look up The war of 1812 for example :)
@@Dargonkin527 Well, I am sure Poland was talking about Afghanistan and Vietnam 😂
1:20. I guess USA was thinking about his war with Vietnam, atomic blast of Japan, and the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan? Isn't that so, guys?
"Hey where did the sun go"
"Don't worry that's just America"
Poland: with a military like that you surely never lost a war
Usa: ...
His silence said enough
US politicians on both sides of the aisle be like: “Better increase military spending”
Because it’s literally nothing but the right and centre…
@@glasscardproductions4736 sadly you’re correct
US has military bases and support all over the world, you'd think it costs a lot to keep all that going on
@@tormendor8585 why even built bases in unnecessary places that doesnt need any help, the US is just wasting money to "protect" country that would just be fine without anyone interfering
@@destroyertashkent5713 oh not its not just to "protect" a country, its all political.
I only recently discovered this channel, but GOD I LOVE IT SO MUCH, all the roasts and suttle historical jokes are incredible
Indonesia: with military like that, you've probably never lost a war
1812 Canada,Vietnam, Afghanistan: * Wheezing Laughter *
They mainly used gorilla warfare. But we got the last laugh when Cambodia found out about Vietnam’s genocidal actions
It's not indonesia, but poland, in polandball memes it has inverted colors
@@Steamy70
yeah but what a mess, The Fans From Indonesian Already Getting Mad broo, Because That Flag Red And White Is Poland 🗿
@@hagemonygods6246 Indonesia is drawn with a hat
I'm from Indonesia
0:55
Hey why does Canada look angry
Cuz the uk is almost crushing canada
Poland: with military like that, you've surely never lost a war!
USA: *vietnam war flashbacks*
they just lost another one
Its
A
Fucking
Indonesia
Not
Poland
Get
Back
To
Kindergarden
This is awesome! i subbed and liked!
Poland: with a military like that, you've surely never lost a war!
America: **remembers the war of 1812**
UK as well
That was a draw, so the US didn't lose. Though the US did lose 2 other wars.
@@alvarorey9308 which ones?
@@mrdankraccoon9144 Vietnam and Afghanistan.
@@alvarorey9308 that’s reasonable, I agree with you
Polandball: With military like that you've surely never lost a war
USAball: *Vietnam flashbacks*
*Afghanistan*
Usa:Wait, I thought I lost a war? But where
I always thought america just pulled out of those conflicts
@@ActiveGamer3000 they did as they were not willing to start ww3 in Vietnam or fight for a country that has given up
@@maple1010 so the us never lost the wars than
Ohhhh, damn. I really laughed at that ending. I'm American, so let me just put this into context. Our military does not lose wars. Our politicians do.
USA experienced the whole Vietnam and Afghan flashbacks in just few mere seconds of dead silence.
Namaste from Mumbai🙏
Namaste🙏
Poland: With a military like that you've surely never lost a war.
Meanwhile Taliban: ( ͝° ͜ʖ͡°)ᕤ
@twój narrator it is poland. In the countryball universe, the flag is usually placed upside down
its INDONESIA NOT POLAND
@@nanikore6860 in countryballs it's often placed upside down so in this case it's not Indonesia
Poland: with that military you've never lost a war
Vietnamese farmer: are you sure about that?
More likely Indonesia than poland
Poland 🇵🇱 this
Indonesia 🇮🇩 this
"With spending like that, surely you've never lost a war!"
"Uh, depends on which part of "you" you mean.
The soldier in me always win the battle.
The politician in me... _blank stare._ "
Poland: With military like that you've surely never lost a war!
USA: Yeah.. Never..
Taliban: *ALLOW* *ME* *TO* *INTRODUCE* *MYSELF*
Helps the taliban when the people the US fought for just crumpled like a god damn house of cards as soon as they left
Should have given the weapons to the women. Thats who really are gonna suffer
@@podomuss the women wouldnt do shit with the weapons, they are untrained. Most likely they gonna just kill themself with them while trying to defend themself from taliban.
@@askreddit2431 Better than what happened with the men
@@podomuss well they were in Afghanistan only for oil. America dont give a crap about Taliban
@@KartikChauhan__KC The US exports more than it imports oil, AKA, it doesn't need to invade to get it
“With military like that you have surely never lost a war!” *American Vietnam Flashbacks intensify*
@Ralph korea wasn't a loss lmaoo
@Ralph I didn't say they won. they just didn't lose.
@Ralph they lost because they failed building the nation. The us stayed 20 years because when they left iraq for the second time it instantly went crazy and because of the fear it might happend the us stayed in afganistan. And aperantly the us didn't learn a thing from nation building in iraq
@Ralph also it wasn't a war against afgansitan but i think you'd already know that
@Ralph us didn't lose against the taliban. Afganistan lost against them. The us just left
"With that many military you should've never lost a war!"
*Awkward silence*
As a history reminder for all those making Vietnam War comments, the reason why the US left Vietnam was because the American people never wanted the war in the first place. As the war dragged on longer, they became even more pissed off that this already unpopular and needless war had dragged on for 20 years. Politicians were losing their jobs over it. So, in the interest of keeping their jobs, the US left. It wasn't for any lack of military might, it was because the Americans didn't want the war at all.
You're forgetting to add that the U.S., S. Vietnam, and N. Vietnam signed the Paris Peace Accords in Jan. 1973. An agreement for the U.S. to withdraw their forces while S. Vietnam took over military operations. N. Vietnam of course, violated the Accords 2 years later and invaded S. Vietnam with 300,000 troops when the U.S. military where longer there and the U.S. Congress flailed on additional funding for the S. Vietnamese Army to continue fighting. Prior to this, the SVA were winning just about every battle against NVA and Vietcong forces as long as they were supplied and funded.
@Nope Didn't you even read what I stated? Do even try to read & learn history? Where is your damn brains? The U.S. was already out of Vietnam by ending 1974. It was then fully under ths SVA government control. Did you even entertain that the S. Vietnamese really did want to be under N. Vietnamese and communist control? Did you even gave a thought that it was the N. Vietnam ALWAYS invading into S. Vietnam through out the entirety of the war and and again breaking the Paris Peace Accords? The U.S., SVA, and other allied forces not once had any ground offensives into N. Vietnam.
Yupe, you hit the nail on the head around 0:31 about america.
Poland: With a military like that you've surely never lost a war
usa: well....
Vietnam: yo what ups bit-
usa: I JUST LEFT I DIDNT LOSE
VIETNAM: SAME THING
Poland:🇵🇱
0:05 "Saya menghabiskan $ 11,9 Miliar tahun lalu untuk militer saya." Indonesia moment
“Money printer, or maybe taxing the poor.”
TRUUUE😂😂😂
It was worth it, out of the 95 American wars we have fought, only 2 were truly lost. We have a. 97% win ratio
USA: “How did I spend more than 59 Billion!?”
C:”How much were the sunglasses🕶 ?”
USA *again* : …..50 billion. But they’re a necessary exspense.
C: *sighs*
Me: wtf China he doesn’t have eyes lol
yeah
white
🐷
China:Where did you get your money?
USA: Money Printer, and taxing the poor.
I'm dead🤣
0:27 Китай: сколько стоили эти солнцезащитные очки?
США: 50 милиардов...
США: но это необходимые расходы
Китай: ._.
America: We never lose, sometimes we just don't win
Poland: with military like that your surely never lost a war USA
Vietnam: hold my bowl of rice
Sorry but that is the flag of the Austronesian elder and greatest brother..Indonesia!
@@wiranagara4708 oh
Poland “with that military you surely didn’t loose a war”
Usa “ flash back: “American Revolutionary War”
We didn’t lose the war… hence why we’re here…?
"With a military like that, you've surely never lost a war!"
PTSD of Vietnam
"Still taller."
"The hat doesn't count comrade."
LOL me killed
This guy deserves at least a million subs, just look at the Quality of his animations Oh my God.
Want to catch these animations early? Consider a channel membership!
Click the JOIN button for more info
Why?
Poland:"surely you never lost a war". Usa: **Vietnam flashbacks intensify**