Top 10 Countries by Military Spending (1870-2020)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 июн 2021
  • This video will compare the top 10 countries by military spending from 1870 to 2020.
    To witness events that have shaped our globe today, and watch empires rise and fall, be sure to watch this video. Be sure to like, comment, and subscribe!
    Datasources: Our World In Data, World Bank, The Correlates of War Project, SIPRI, Wikipedia, Eh.net
    Music: Heart of Iron 4

Комментарии • 15 тыс.

  • @RankingCharts
    @RankingCharts  2 года назад +2875

    *Only 0.6% of people watching this video are subscribed, so if you enjoyed this video and want to see more, be sure to click that subscribe button! It would be greatly appreciated!
    This is the largest video on this channel so far, and it will compare the top 10 countries by military spending from 1870 to 2020. Enjoy!

  • @SamMaalouf
    @SamMaalouf 2 года назад +32434

    USSR: Okay, I'm going away, you can cut military spending.
    USA: _no_

    • @Lyu_HX
      @Lyu_HX 2 года назад +3969

      After the USSR passed away, the USA is like a man who already drew his sword out but doesn't know where his enemy is.

    • @candicoated2001
      @candicoated2001 2 года назад +619

      I mean we did have War on Terrorism next so..
      Edit:
      - Yes I know it wasn't an actual war.
      -Yes I know it was about oil.
      -Yes I know it was America using money to make terrorist fight other terrorist
      -Yes, I know you dont need that much money to fight.
      -Yes I know about the atrocities
      I never said any of those things weren't true or didn't happen.
      Jesus Christ, it's funny how a one sentence comment can be misinterpreted.

    • @theinsomnia9282
      @theinsomnia9282 2 года назад +670

      China : LEZZ GOOOO

    • @kordellswoffer1520
      @kordellswoffer1520 2 года назад +392

      Well as percentage of gdp it has been cutting back spending for like 30 years.

    • @CC-dk5di
      @CC-dk5di 2 года назад +1571

      @@candicoated2001 Yea US trained a bunch of terrorists and fought them. That's because they don't have an enemy so they gotta make one

  • @krios396
    @krios396 2 года назад +22548

    You know there is a world war when germany is on top

    • @harshadbrown2312
      @harshadbrown2312 2 года назад +1410

      More like when America goes..GAS GAS GAS

    • @fuss7414
      @fuss7414 2 года назад +1017

      And the war end when USA go brrrrrrr

    • @Sailinator2303
      @Sailinator2303 2 года назад +85

      1923?

    • @cmds5604
      @cmds5604 2 года назад +199

      @@harshadbrown2312 and ussr go down. And again GASS GASSS GAASSSSSSSSS

    • @Sailinator2303
      @Sailinator2303 2 года назад +33

      1887

  • @christophermccoy151
    @christophermccoy151 7 месяцев назад +343

    As a Canadian, seeing Canada up there is a trip.
    I mean I know our position in ww2, but its such a contrast to the 4 tanks we have now.

    • @the_milkmann
      @the_milkmann 6 месяцев назад +29

      As an Aussie I was taken aback by the fact Australia at one point had managed to reach the top 10.

    • @dumbhuman1109
      @dumbhuman1109 5 месяцев назад +27

      As a brit, I'm shocked my ancestors used to own both of yall

    • @juliandacosta6841
      @juliandacosta6841 5 месяцев назад +10

      Surprised that it wasn't on the graph during WW1, but that might be because the UK was technically in charge of our foreign affairs at that time.

    • @dumbhuman1109
      @dumbhuman1109 5 месяцев назад +3

      @@juliandacosta6841 *laughs in British*

    • @__KursK__
      @__KursK__ 5 месяцев назад +8

      Same with germany. Using one half of the Tank fleet as part storages and the other doesnt work

  • @Brandon-ih8mg
    @Brandon-ih8mg Год назад +70

    Very interesting, You can literally predict what countries are preparing for war, defending and offensive.

    • @Rocket_T2
      @Rocket_T2 14 дней назад

      It's clearly china who is offensive now, recent reports shows they are spending 700 billions yearly.

    • @azDanqs
      @azDanqs 11 дней назад +1

      escept usa thats chilling with half a trillion dollar military for no reason

    • @WW-fn7rt
      @WW-fn7rt 9 дней назад +1

      @@azDanqsThe reason is simple. World Domination.

    • @azDanqs
      @azDanqs 9 дней назад

      @@WW-fn7rt military bases?

  • @SC-lc5wg
    @SC-lc5wg 2 года назад +14423

    *Everyone gangsta until Germany suddenly increase thier military spending*

    • @TheWagonroast
      @TheWagonroast 2 года назад +47

      :0

    • @iris3865
      @iris3865 2 года назад +194

      ...oh no-

    • @user-cc3iu4mp7x
      @user-cc3iu4mp7x 2 года назад +80

      @@Leeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee what does it have to do with Germany's millitary spending?

    • @Tosse901
      @Tosse901 2 года назад +316

      @@Leeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee even if germany could, they wouldn't. We live in a free europe, we are peaceful, we are one of the most stable democracies in this planet, I mean what a childish worldview do you have?
      You think people here are the same as when the nazis were in charge?

    • @user-cc3iu4mp7x
      @user-cc3iu4mp7x 2 года назад +231

      @@Tosse901 do you actually not understand it was a joke?

  • @mateuskievel5357
    @mateuskievel5357 2 года назад +8315

    I like how Germany always appears with different "clothes" from time to time

    • @jordanplays-transitandgame1690
      @jordanplays-transitandgame1690 2 года назад +416

      German Empire, Nazi Germany, East/West Germany, Germany

    • @Fabi-ni5im
      @Fabi-ni5im 2 года назад +351

      @@jordanplays-transitandgame1690 and Weimarer Republic

    • @Mincraftdude
      @Mincraftdude 2 года назад +153

      DEUTSCHLAND Das sind wir lol 🇩🇪

    • @PW218
      @PW218 2 года назад +57

      European Union

    • @padoraye
      @padoraye 2 года назад +19

      China as well

  • @thombaz
    @thombaz 3 месяца назад +125

    As a Hungarian It's crazy to see how fast other countries recovered, we fallen apart in 1918 and still kinda falling.

    • @AEIOU05
      @AEIOU05 Месяц назад +5

      Trianon was a bitch, that treaty really unfairly put Hungary to the knife, which was even worse considering how it suffered from WW1

    • @fish5671
      @fish5671 Месяц назад +3

      @@AEIOU05Hungary really got the germany treatment

    • @AEIOU05
      @AEIOU05 Месяц назад +5

      @@fish5671 Versailles was nothing compared to Trianon and St. Germain. Germany was a big country and able to recover whereas Austria and Hungary only survived due to foreign loans

    • @KR0TE7
      @KR0TE7 Месяц назад +6

      You guys got the same treatment as germany which was unfair but it's been over a 100 years germany went to another world War had their country destroyed occupied by 2 superpowers and is now prosperous so idk

    • @personalmobile9421
      @personalmobile9421 Месяц назад +1

      So you don't know about Kurdistan , we became nothing after the collapse of Afsharyd Empire , we are weak enough , even Iran and Turkey claim the name of Empire for themselves .
      A word of advice for you , keep your distance from Turks , they have nothing to lose

  • @laplthelullemann
    @laplthelullemann 15 дней назад +7

    Poland immediately after WW2: Nope, not gonna let that happen again!

  • @sab_mein_expert2214
    @sab_mein_expert2214 2 года назад +2284

    "Sir our estimation says we need 10 of these weapons"
    USA: Hmm ye but give me 100

    • @thatoneeagle7895
      @thatoneeagle7895 2 года назад +110

      America has it's own measurement system so it can have it's own logic system as well ;)

    • @levihamm6640
      @levihamm6640 2 года назад +14

      Backups, soldiers beat the shit out of their weapons, I imagine this is twice as true for us

    • @yuqizhao6508
      @yuqizhao6508 2 года назад +14

      Meanwhile in USSR, better be 1000 for me.

    • @reclusiarchgrimaldus1269
      @reclusiarchgrimaldus1269 2 года назад +6

      Never enuff dakka

    • @josephc.9520
      @josephc.9520 2 года назад +14

      Pilot: Sir, may I have a new helmet? I accidentally poured juice into mine and it short circuited.
      Senior officer: No problem, lemme get you a new one
      The helmet manufacturer: Ah, another 400k coolly pocketed

  • @Mike-ij4rq
    @Mike-ij4rq 2 года назад +4147

    USA at the beginning of a world war: *I’m too weak*
    USA at the end of a world war: *UNLIMITED SPENDING*

    • @fuleinist
      @fuleinist 2 года назад +54

      Show me the money 😅

    • @handlemonium
      @handlemonium 2 года назад +190

      America would make Palpatine proud.

    • @elturro3308
      @elturro3308 2 года назад +23

      History of any shonen anime

    • @erickolb8581
      @erickolb8581 2 года назад +10

      Obamanation: give everything to the communists in China.
      Hopefully him and Biden finally decide to give their families over to the communists too.
      Obama bin Biden

    • @Very_Nice_and_Polite_Person
      @Very_Nice_and_Polite_Person 2 года назад +62

      @@erickolb8581 Conservative madlibs, repeat Fox News talking points but mix up the order to the point where it sounds hilarious and makes no sense. Seriously dude, are you drunk or just really, really stupid? Probably both, right?

  • @labonnesociete
    @labonnesociete Год назад +1

    Wow! Fantastic animated graphics. I think I should invest in military conglomerates ;-)

  • @Teelie_
    @Teelie_ 11 месяцев назад +117

    the fact that in the middle of ww2 the peak spending was around 5 bil says a lot about how large the world economy has grown, most of europe was sitting at over 15 in the 1990s

    • @goldeagle8051
      @goldeagle8051 8 месяцев назад +45

      I think you're forgetting about inflation.

    • @DinnyDonbas
      @DinnyDonbas 7 месяцев назад +13

      Buddy did you not watch the video?? Both Germany and USA were at about 50 bil in 42

    • @subify14
      @subify14 5 месяцев назад

      @yeeeeeeeeeee78
      yeeeeeeh it affects our fart due to WatchData is a fart
      Edit LIKE

    • @nighttimeasbestos5958
      @nighttimeasbestos5958 15 дней назад

      @@goldeagle8051 even accounting for inflation, we're still spending hundreds of billions more than countries back then

    • @willw5868
      @willw5868 14 дней назад

      @@goldeagle8051the video is all in USD inflation is not a factor

  • @gryf92
    @gryf92 2 года назад +3857

    Nazi Germany: has 9 times the budget of France
    France: the Maginot Line will hold....

    • @Davi_Vilhena
      @Davi_Vilhena 2 года назад +311

      Germany: *passing by Belgium*

    • @turdferguson3803
      @turdferguson3803 2 года назад +440

      The French had been building up their military since the 1920s, Germany only started serious rearmament in the mid 1930s.
      The Maginot Line would have held if the French had adequately defended the Ardennes, their army was much larger, more motorized, and they even had better tanks for the most part.

    • @turdferguson3803
      @turdferguson3803 2 года назад +197

      @Lile Stojkovic They were better armored and had more firepower along with having similar mobility. Tanks like the Char B1 and the Somua S-35 were far superior to the Panzer I and II which still made up the bulk of German armored forces at the time. The Panzer III and Panzer IV would end up being much better later on, but in 1940 they were still underquipped to go up against them.
      France's military equipment wasn't oudated lol, the French had more modern tanks than the Germans did in 1940. When Germany actually started the war in 1939 they only had enough equipment to equip 3/4ths of their army.
      France didn't believe that Germany's main attack would be through the ardennes, had they prepared for a major attack the German invasion would have at least stalled or at worst ended in complete disaster. The Germans left their flanks completely exposed and used made panzer divisions keep advancing without artillaery support in order to push through in the first place, had France prepared its armored divisions effectively they could have easily cut off the German spearhead or have stopped the attack dead in its tracks.
      Even German generals like Guderian said that the Battle of France shouldn't have been a German victory, the French Army was more than equipped enough to stop the German invasion.

    • @hman8338
      @hman8338 2 года назад +95

      @@turdferguson3803 this. They believed the Ardennes was naturally impenetrable

    • @dominikobora5385
      @dominikobora5385 2 года назад +101

      @@hman8338 thats the problem the french high command was uesless and their tactics outdated, they actually spotted germen columns going through the ardeness but didnt believe it, they could of sent more troops there or bombed the germen columns
      Also defeatism was a huge problem and due to the very low morale most divisons would just sit in their posisitikns to afraid to so anything, i would have to find the exact source(its midnight rn for me) but a french incursion of 1000 into the ruhr was stopped by 2 machine gunners and a couple riflemen, they just had little to none will to fight

  • @mr.h4294
    @mr.h4294 2 года назад +6463

    The US has a unique ability to inflate the defense budget to any number it feels like during wars

    • @ggoddkkiller1342
      @ggoddkkiller1342 2 года назад +373

      After soviet union collapsed global military spending was reduced quite significantly that you can see in this video as well but sadly after 2001 it exploded again!! Normally i don't believe conspiracy theories at all but a single incident changing people's mindset so severely and making US pro-military, pro-war again couldn't be explained with anything else...

    • @mr.h4294
      @mr.h4294 2 года назад +305

      @@ggoddkkiller1342 we're just bored with the other countries and wanna fight some aliens

    • @stalinsaysgulagtime2350
      @stalinsaysgulagtime2350 2 года назад +134

      @@ggoddkkiller1342 Thousands of Americans were killed on our soil. American blood was spilt on American soil by terrorists. That is a reason to go to war.

    • @ggoddkkiller1342
      @ggoddkkiller1342 2 года назад +351

      @@stalinsaysgulagtime2350 American blood was split on American soil by terrorists who got funded and armed against soviets between 1979 and 1989 by CIA under Operation Cylone!! Don't forget metioning the last part please...

    • @stalinsaysgulagtime2350
      @stalinsaysgulagtime2350 2 года назад +68

      @@ggoddkkiller1342 I'm aware of that, but our "friend" became our enemy. We need to eliminate all terrorists, and never fund them again to fight our enemy.

  • @DarkMatterX1
    @DarkMatterX1 6 месяцев назад +30

    The casual effortlessness of the US rocketing straight to the top any time it needs to is a sight to see.

    • @DarkMatterX1
      @DarkMatterX1 6 месяцев назад

      @@Jk-qx7gm
      That has zero to do with this video, you absolute butterbrain. This graph shows economic power.
      The US has the most flexible, dynamic economy on the planet and always has. It's why we became the largest economy on Earth a century after being formed and have remained so for 130 years.
      Go be an asschapped litttle yuro somewhere else.

    • @yuluoxianjun
      @yuluoxianjun Месяц назад

      yes,biggest terrorist that everyone is fear and hate

    • @mho...
      @mho... 20 дней назад

      yeah & all they have to do is ignore healthcare, education & freedoms, easy!

    • @Zeroneii3
      @Zeroneii3 8 дней назад +3

      The U.S. was an economic behemoth that didn't really care about its military until post WW2

  • @ballerVRofficialpoo
    @ballerVRofficialpoo 5 месяцев назад +11

    I had imagined these numbers to go bonkers during ww1 lol. Did not disappoint, especially after the Lusitania event 💀

    • @anigmaYT
      @anigmaYT 6 дней назад

      Bro its not for inflation

  • @anzerepse269
    @anzerepse269 2 года назад +6170

    The fact how fast Germany restored its military and economy from ww1 to ww2 is just incredible

    • @anzerepse269
      @anzerepse269 2 года назад +38

      @@chaimlakota13 true

    • @bospaladin8007
      @bospaladin8007 2 года назад +884

      @@chaimlakota13 That's true for many crazy leaders, crazy leaders are actualy good leaders untill they get too crazy.

    • @larochejaquelein3680
      @larochejaquelein3680 2 года назад +143

      @@chaimlakota13 The Nazis were hostile to the idea of social welfare in principle, upholding instead the Social Darwinist Natural Selection concept that the weak and feeble should perish.
      Also, The German government funded much of its military effort through plunder, especially plundering the wealth of Jewish citizens and the like, both at home and in the conquered territories

    • @rakisuta1100
      @rakisuta1100 2 года назад +70

      Hitler spend so much money in those years. One of the main reasons he choose to attack others countries was to loot them

    • @lilijhonston
      @lilijhonston 2 года назад +390

      @@chaimlakota13 he wasn't an amazing leader he was a skilled speaker who used his abilities to bring germany and its neighbours to ruin. You can't really discount the horrible things he did from an assessment of his worth as a leader.

  • @martin840909
    @martin840909 2 года назад +4044

    In 1943 Germany spent 47 Billion, now UK spent 48 Billion in 2020. Considering US inflation of 17 times from 1940 until now, Germany spent almost 800 Billion in 1945 compared with now, even more than US spending in 2020.

    • @godalfred2266
      @godalfred2266 2 года назад +512

      Power of dictatorship 😂😂😂

    • @ryanertime
      @ryanertime 2 года назад +706

      The yanks tend to fight the poor, where as the Nazis fought everyone.

    • @jout738
      @jout738 2 года назад +1

      Yes I dont know why US wasting 700 billion nowdays to their poor leftist feminist Lgbtq army, when now major war conflict going on, so in world wars only its best to spend a lot money on military then.

    • @ryanertime
      @ryanertime 2 года назад +1

      @@jout738 because as global military hegemon they get to exploit the resources of the world as they like and make sure no one tries any other type of govt.

    • @MrSpartanspud
      @MrSpartanspud 2 года назад +524

      I am pretty sure all the amounts are measured in today's money. Otherwise most of the money in the world today would have been spent on military spending in 1940 if those numbers are before inflation is factored in.

  • @200131356
    @200131356 Год назад +12

    I’m interested in seeing an updated version of this all the way to 2023

    • @R-BURQUENO
      @R-BURQUENO Год назад +3

      I am as well. I would guess China & Russia definitely had a big uptick in spending these last three years. I'm also surprised not to see Israel somewhere in the Top 10, at least recently throughout this timeline.
      I wouldn't be surprised to see Ukraine somewhere on this list, and if so, that should count towards the United States/United Kingdom spending. We all know The United States, Poland, United Kingdom ect, are the ones propping up Ukraine. Not advocating for or against it, just stating the obvious. Very interesting.

    • @ethanfriedersdorf
      @ethanfriedersdorf 16 дней назад

      Well we know us spending was like almost 900 billion last year lol

  • @seanrahn2842
    @seanrahn2842 Год назад +6

    And that folks is the Military Industrial Complex in action!

  • @norcofreerider604
    @norcofreerider604 2 года назад +5068

    What I find really interesting to think about is that during the 70's and 80's, while military spending by the Soviet Union and the U.S., in terms of dollars, was fairly on par, as a percentage of GDP, the Soviets spent about 25% on the military, while the U.S. was around 4%.

    • @kerotomas1
      @kerotomas1 2 года назад +389

      There is no contest when the US can have any amount of spending and therefore national debt (which is already over a year’s worth of gdp) they choose thanks to the petrodollar

    • @ivario
      @ivario 2 года назад +336

      @@kerotomas1 Are you seriously trying to say that the Soviets couldn't print money with even more freedom in their state-controlled economy 😀

    • @kerotomas1
      @kerotomas1 2 года назад +333

      @@ivario guess what happened? the USSR collapsed because they couldn't pay back the foreign loans - that was used to cover their money printing
      guess what the US doesn't do? paying back the foreign loans - that is being used to cover their money printing - see? kinda same with the exception that because of the petrodollar the US is not in a hurry paying back any kind of money but it will collapse eventually (when electric vehicles and sht like that is gonna be the mainstream and US's rule over the oil is gonna be useless)

    • @Zalmoxesuwu
      @Zalmoxesuwu 2 года назад +217

      @@kerotomas1 the ussr didn’t collapse because of that lol.

    • @x_ruevit_x2895
      @x_ruevit_x2895 2 года назад +520

      @@Zalmoxesuwu The USSR collapsed due to many factors, this is just one of them.

  • @mrxsatyr8459
    @mrxsatyr8459 2 года назад +1089

    WW2: *exists*
    Countries: You wanna see some real speed?

    • @juhannusruusu
      @juhannusruusu 2 года назад +11

      Europe*

    • @cmds5604
      @cmds5604 2 года назад +3

      1914 to 1991

    • @desaifamily8239
      @desaifamily8239 2 года назад +30

      @@juhannusruusu The US on this chart whenever we enter a war
      *Allow us to introduce ourselves*

    • @randomclouds4404
      @randomclouds4404 2 года назад +21

      @@juhannusruusu In other news, Japan is now in Europe.

    • @daniele5349
      @daniele5349 2 года назад +2

      Italy in ww1 and ww2 , why I am so weak?
      Spent nothing

  • @ashishchawla90
    @ashishchawla90 6 месяцев назад +1

    Out of curosity..Which software do you use to visualise this data? @Rankingcharts

  • @sgx9874
    @sgx9874 6 месяцев назад +26

    It would be helpful to have some indication as to what conflict or event is going on as well, as that would greatly explain the rise and fall in spending level for each country.

    • @Grooove_e
      @Grooove_e 5 месяцев назад +8

      Having a basic knowledge of history would do this for you....

    • @Mahmood0419
      @Mahmood0419 5 месяцев назад +3

      @@Grooove_eyou shouldn’t embarrass anyone like that

    • @Grooove_e
      @Grooove_e 5 месяцев назад +2

      @@Mahmood0419 Why not? World is too soft these days. People need to be called out.

    • @Mahmood0419
      @Mahmood0419 4 месяца назад +2

      @@Grooove_e it was just a joke

    • @hejalll
      @hejalll Месяц назад +1

      @@Grooove_eYou’re misguided if you think the average person is gonna know more than the date of ww1 and ww2 in this period of time

  • @shinizuko
    @shinizuko 2 года назад +4389

    All nations in 2000s': We only need a army for self-defence
    USA: *laughs in cowboy*

    • @beojack4592
      @beojack4592 2 года назад +159

      Russia: Laughs while spraying the Ukrainian tears it was drinking everywhere.

    • @chrisblack6258
      @chrisblack6258 2 года назад +173

      I don't see China as self-defence country 😂

    • @kilik5713
      @kilik5713 2 года назад +103

      @@chrisblack6258 Still only spends a third of the US military budget a year

    • @chrisblack6258
      @chrisblack6258 2 года назад +121

      @@kilik5713 Not really. China doesn't count a lot of stuff like research costs into the military spending as US do as far as I understand. The actual spending is much higher than the data shown in the video.

    • @kilik5713
      @kilik5713 2 года назад +57

      @@chrisblack6258 Does it come close to the US though there is still almost 500 billion in between

  • @Dragoon45
    @Dragoon45 2 года назад +2830

    The fact it is measured in US Dollars gives a hint to the ending

    • @nasrinsultana2202
      @nasrinsultana2202 2 года назад +34

      Least liked verified comment I ever found. From a ACTUAL CONTENT CREATOR. ONLY 34 LIKES?

    • @TheForge10
      @TheForge10 2 года назад +23

      so it should be renminbi or the rouble ?

    • @joshwhite522
      @joshwhite522 2 года назад +2

      yo dragoon, i love your content, yoy are truly the goodest and soupiest content creator

    • @alexyu8951
      @alexyu8951 2 года назад +1

      wtf how did i find *you* here and why did I find you only from 20 hrs ago

    • @piotrdymek9713
      @piotrdymek9713 2 года назад

      Only 6 replies, I'M GONNA BE 7TH!

  • @FantasyFrames-007
    @FantasyFrames-007 6 месяцев назад

    Cool to see the development

  • @5top5-tv7mf
    @5top5-tv7mf 7 месяцев назад

    thank you for video.what is program?

  • @tobias9913
    @tobias9913 2 года назад +2900

    You can't say anything but Germany's recovery abilities are legendary

    • @Thebeepboopman
      @Thebeepboopman 2 года назад +702

      Germany after loosing 2 wars, inflation, being cut in half, loosing huge amounts of territory and people: Tis but A scratch

    • @kohrona7356
      @kohrona7356 2 года назад +6

      @@Thebeepboopman lol

    • @selambenn
      @selambenn 2 года назад +2

      I agree

    • @jaideep2509
      @jaideep2509 2 года назад +42

      @@Thebeepboopman I wouldn't say Germany lost ww2 yes at the end the result was failure but they left a huge mark

    • @Thebeepboopman
      @Thebeepboopman 2 года назад +214

      @@jaideep2509 you just said something that supports the fact that germany lost while you were trying to say that it didn't lost. Germanys loss is that huge mark you mentioned. That huge mark was a divided germany, millions of dead german citizen and soldiers, huge economic problems and the loss of territory. And yet according to you it didn't lost?

  • @featuresnobodyaskedfor
    @featuresnobodyaskedfor 2 года назад +3571

    Would be a nice addition to have off to the side a footnote of relevant conflicts at the time. It's always fascinating seeing the massive shifts during times of war.

    • @vonsopas
      @vonsopas 2 года назад +34

      What’s more interesting IMHO is how the budgets shifted during the 90’s during the immediate Post- Cold War and then the rise of China as the new superpower and the rearmament of Russia. Goes to show how the world order hasn’t really settled down (and is still settling as shown a few days ago)

    • @bena9369
      @bena9369 2 года назад +77

      Yesss watching the video i kept thinking like 1898 Spanish American war and things like that

    • @billfearnside834
      @billfearnside834 2 года назад

      @@vonsopas right

    • @ymj5161
      @ymj5161 2 года назад +4

      time stamp is enough for it i think.

    • @janknoblich4129
      @janknoblich4129 2 года назад +5

      Yeah what happened with Russia in 1870s?

  • @NotInterXX
    @NotInterXX 5 месяцев назад +5

    You can tell what wars were happening when. 1898, US spending skyrocketed for the American-Spanish war. 1903, Russian and Japanese spending were high for the Russo-Japanese… then… world war 2.

    • @shaansingh6048
      @shaansingh6048 2 месяца назад

      plus it collapsed during the 1905 revolution

  • @openyourlies
    @openyourlies Год назад +1

    Been constipated for the last 5 days and watching this just unblocked me. Very dramatic - but very grateful! 😉🤣

  • @tigrecito48
    @tigrecito48 2 года назад +1833

    you should do a timeline of gdp vs military spending to get a % of wealth each nation spends on military

    • @j2174
      @j2174 2 года назад +166

      Yes, that would certainly be more interesting and relevant.

    • @quzuqbotak
      @quzuqbotak 2 года назад +2

      Nice

    • @hawk5394
      @hawk5394 2 года назад +28

      The US would still be on top lol we are war hungry

    • @prosterdbz9663
      @prosterdbz9663 2 года назад +135

      @@hawk5394 Nope, Russia and North Korea and a few more spend more in terms of %.

    • @vincemarenger7122
      @vincemarenger7122 2 года назад +49

      @@prosterdbz9663 Yea, North Korea even has the biggest % of population recruited into the military.

  • @demekagamine
    @demekagamine 2 года назад +956

    I was gonna sarcastically remark "ah yes moving lines for 10 minutes, very interesting" but then I remembered I play hoi4 for hours at a time.

    • @Gwebb74
      @Gwebb74 2 года назад +30

      1 province at a time

    • @BLINDrOBOTFILMS
      @BLINDrOBOTFILMS 2 года назад +20

      I just played the video on 1.5 speed. Still perfectly understandable though the music sounds like the conductor's on cocaine.

    • @SteventheOrigin
      @SteventheOrigin 2 года назад +17

      _A fellow player who stares at maps for hours. A welcome surprise_

    • @TrulyAndasen
      @TrulyAndasen 2 года назад +17

      I don't know how but a glorified map staring game is so fun to play

    • @Georges_IV
      @Georges_IV 2 года назад +1

      @@TrulyAndasensame

  • @MagisterVeritas
    @MagisterVeritas Год назад +4

    Everyone's getting a bit nervouse when Germany's like 'I'll have a go at it'

  • @user-xo9kz7he4i
    @user-xo9kz7he4i 7 месяцев назад

    Russia: We have a working hypersound and underwater nuclear drones.
    USA: We have a dozen aircraft carriers and a starlink - but fuck knows how to fight them...

  • @tylercastano7753
    @tylercastano7753 2 года назад +2876

    *Russia spending three times as much as Japan in 1904-5 and still losing the war*

    • @98cents
      @98cents 2 года назад +671

      In all fairness, Russia is huge, and most of their fleet and army was in the west where a majority of the country lived. Those borders were far more important. They hadn't taken Japan serious until the war was practically over for them.

    • @delacroixx
      @delacroixx 2 года назад +473

      And then it's using 3x less than Germany in ww2 and winning. I guess winning the war is not only about the budget

    • @nicknamenick9448
      @nicknamenick9448 2 года назад +48

      Actually they won

    • @j2174
      @j2174 2 года назад +232

      Military budget does not mean winning. The US has arguably lost most wars, and yet has nearly always had the or one of the largest budgets. And even in wars they were on the winning side of, it was as allies and they entered late.

    • @AntonDDimov
      @AntonDDimov 2 года назад +38

      @@j2174 they deny that

  • @rebellionplaysyt6038
    @rebellionplaysyt6038 2 года назад +188

    Ottoman: hello me rich
    Also ottoman a minute later: bye

    • @TheJewishNazi69
      @TheJewishNazi69 2 года назад +8

      they would’ve been on or near the top for about 400 years prior to this timeline

  • @PoloDavey
    @PoloDavey Год назад

    Captivating

  • @ahedsheif
    @ahedsheif Год назад +54

    I like how the United States skyrocketed its military spending during the major wars. It's astonishing to see that.

    • @shanelewis5147
      @shanelewis5147 Год назад +16

      It really is the whole sleeping giant idea

    • @bow_wow_wow
      @bow_wow_wow Год назад +3

      Got a taste of the cherry and never looked back

    • @Kruppt808
      @Kruppt808 Год назад +3

      Those billion dollar slingshots ate not gonna build themselves :p

    • @alexanderjones8914
      @alexanderjones8914 11 месяцев назад

      All paid for by the loans it was selling the UK to defend democracy

  • @Liam_Daly
    @Liam_Daly Год назад +1742

    It's interesting to see how the US stayed relatively stable in spending growth, from 1870 to 1896. This is really does showing for the first major wars in Europe that the US did have a mentality of it not being their war

    • @awanderer3047
      @awanderer3047 Год назад +71

      And seeing how the US dominated military spending after that, almost the big brother "You mess with them, you mess with me" mentality Edit: you know what, you people suck and I'm putting it back to my original comment.

    • @anime_ymri_blin
      @anime_ymri_blin Год назад +99

      @@awanderer3047 rather, the mentality of a robber and a tyrant

    • @TheAnnoyingBoss
      @TheAnnoyingBoss Год назад +1

      @@anime_ymri_blin Putin sure brainwashed you good

    • @sugandesenuds6663
      @sugandesenuds6663 Год назад +250

      @@awanderer3047 well after ww2 the US military doctrine changed. basically, we build bases around the world, so if any threat to us comes up, we can cut it out before it grows

    • @talusn9405
      @talusn9405 Год назад +29

      All know Germany was sponsoring by USA :)

  • @Dubanx
    @Dubanx 2 года назад +2364

    Just some fun years to watch.
    1898- Spanish American War
    1904- Russo Japanese war.
    1905- HMS dreadnought launches, sparking the naval race.
    1912- Balkan War (You see the Ottoman empire surge).
    1913/1914- WWI and its buildup.
    1917- US Joins WWI.
    1917-1923- Communist revolution in Russia & Polish-Soviet war.
    1933- Hitler takes power.
    1939- WWII
    1942- US joins war (technically it was December 1941, but 1942 is when you really start to see the budget change).
    1949- Russia tests first nuclear bomb.
    1950- Korean war
    1979-1989- Soviet Afghan war.
    1989-1991 Collapse of the Soviet Union>
    2001- 9/11
    2003- Iraq Invasion.
    Vietnam's ramp up was so slow that I excluded it. It wasn't actually that interesting to watch.

    • @Oeggonom
      @Oeggonom 2 года назад +12

      Thx Sir. Really interesting.

    • @payaso216
      @payaso216 2 года назад +4

      The first one isnt even a war

    • @Rescel1
      @Rescel1 2 года назад +49

      1871 Franco-Prussian War

    • @KushManeLucio
      @KushManeLucio 2 года назад +3

      All that money Soviet union spent on the afghan war just to lose

    • @AngelSanchez-fn7qg
      @AngelSanchez-fn7qg 2 года назад +18

      Its curious how usa starts spendig more money before 1898, like they had calculated that war to "liberate" cuba

  • @eHun963
    @eHun963 5 месяцев назад

    wars financed by bankers, great video

  • @heavyd777
    @heavyd777 6 месяцев назад +1

    If you know some history this is like a time machine.

  • @sparky6899
    @sparky6899 2 года назад +1283

    US Citizens: How about some healthcare?
    US Gov: How about some missiles instead?

    • @Stevenlee-vl7rx
      @Stevenlee-vl7rx 2 года назад +78

      We have healthcare. You mistake free healthcare for good healthcare.. When they are not one on the same

    • @carval51
      @carval51 2 года назад +150

      the problem is not that you don't have budget for healthcare. but your healthcare is corrupted and had alot of lobbying to the point that it had unreasonable prices. just look at prices in Usa compared to every other country

    • @sparky6899
      @sparky6899 2 года назад +189

      @@Stevenlee-vl7rx No healthcare is free. It's just that some countries prioritise the health of their citizens over making instruments of war.

    • @carval51
      @carval51 2 года назад +18

      @@MegaTeeruk people really need to see this chart the military spending of Usa literally smaller than education or even healthcare.

    • @Stevenlee-vl7rx
      @Stevenlee-vl7rx 2 года назад +23

      @@sparky6899 you clearly cant read. Lets try one more time.
      Free healthcare... Is not the same... As good healthcare.

  • @nickdettmer6967
    @nickdettmer6967 2 года назад +2191

    In the early periods, you can actually majorly tell when the US was at war. The budget would go from “just enough” to “you have chosen death” really fast. After world war 2, though, I just sort of stayed at that elevated state.
    EDIT: Okay, guys, seriously. Break it up. I was just trying to make a lighthearted observation. Please stop arguing over the modern state of the United States.

    • @lordomacron3719
      @lordomacron3719 2 года назад +152

      this in part why Amdrail Yamato said "I can give you 6 months of Victory" i think he also referanced the USA as a Sleeping dragon it was its Economic power he feared more that its Millitary

    • @michaelswartz4903
      @michaelswartz4903 2 года назад +139

      The policy after world War 2 was to be able to fight off a minimum of 2 other nations at once. Since world War 2 we fought on 2 fronts reapectively... Europe and Asia (yes I know Africa but that falls under the European side pushing them back to europe) we have essentially maintained the ability to strategically hold a prolonged War with the next 2 strongest nations ever since... Russia and China and fight them both at once

    • @bodhijitbiswas6282
      @bodhijitbiswas6282 2 года назад +92

      @@michaelswartz4903 at this point the US can take on the rest of the world combined in a conventional war if it was a defensive engagement.

    • @michaelswartz4903
      @michaelswartz4903 2 года назад +38

      @@bodhijitbiswas6282 5000 years of military doctrine has taught us that one does not defend there way to victory. And the us is in a bad place. We would be hard pressed to fight a war with just one other super power right now let alone 2. China and Russia. Russia being the most modernized to us atm with equivalent equipment. The Chinese have had only small engagements in recent history but capabilities are not far off.

    • @MyBrainGlows
      @MyBrainGlows 2 года назад +89

      @@michaelswartz4903 half of russian war material doesnt even work properly. They just builded some new flagships to look cool, a lot of money went a loooong way down to generals or ministers privat bank accounts.

  • @Aref.sayyad
    @Aref.sayyad Год назад

    Amazing statistics 😮😮😮

  • @karynbrady7852
    @karynbrady7852 6 дней назад

    Anyone know what music is playing in the background? It really goes with military spending.

  • @rudolfaerofare2683
    @rudolfaerofare2683 2 года назад +1124

    The U.S. reminds me somewhat of how I play RTS games: build up a gargantuan economy first while focusing on defence, then go all-out with an endless, relentless offense and pour a lot into military research/tech. XD

    • @idsfxtm5759
      @idsfxtm5759 2 года назад +5

      Rts?

    • @justinengle7907
      @justinengle7907 2 года назад +35

      Have you played polytopia? That kind of strategy is really good in that game

    • @rudolfaerofare2683
      @rudolfaerofare2683 2 года назад +92

      @@idsfxtm5759 Real-time strategy e.g. Age of Empires, Command & Conquer, Rise of Nations, World in Conflict, Company of Heroes, Total War, etc. :-)

    • @rudolfaerofare2683
      @rudolfaerofare2683 2 года назад +4

      @@justinengle7907 Nope! I think it's the first time I've heard of it. I'll check it out, thanks!

    • @idsfxtm5759
      @idsfxtm5759 2 года назад +24

      @@rudolfaerofare2683 my favorites favorite strategy game is Hoi4 and Eu4

  • @Inderastein
    @Inderastein 2 года назад +271

    China: slowly climbing*
    USA: You heard something hon?
    Russia: Must've been the wind.

    • @nemura7578
      @nemura7578 2 года назад +27

      China rising isnt really surprising seeing how she has 1.2 billion people not to mention the US that always threaten war with china which is very ironic. The US saying its because of human rights violation while the US literally has dozens and dozens of war crimes in the arabian peninsula as well as in central and south america

    • @cortster12
      @cortster12 2 года назад +15

      @@nemura7578 China always threatens war with Taiwan and theit power creep in the South 'China' sea, soooo we have to tell them to knock it off.

    • @user-qg9yy1yg5u
      @user-qg9yy1yg5u 2 года назад +8

      @@cortster12 What war? Which war ? What do you mean your " always" ? What do you know about Taiwan ?

    • @sirhu3633
      @sirhu3633 2 года назад +4

      @@cortster12 Maybe the Chinese couldn't solve the Taiwan issue 30 years ago, but it's different today

    • @hikalankgraviphoton2106
      @hikalankgraviphoton2106 2 года назад +18

      @@cortster12 Taiwan is China’s inherent territory, this is a civil war🤗

  • @john2000young
    @john2000young Год назад +1

    Where did you get the data?

  • @G6JPG
    @G6JPG 6 месяцев назад +7

    Fascinating: I watched at quarter speed!
    One point however: since it's scaled by the top spender, it can be misleading - a bar getting shorter despite that country increasing spend, or vice versa. Maybe it'd be better not to adjust continuously, but use a fixed scale, perhaps jumping by a factor of two whenever the top spender exceeded a (doubling) threshold.

  • @snickerpls5111
    @snickerpls5111 2 года назад +1383

    As an italian, it's incredible to me how Italy remained in this top 10 for at least half the time. I'd have never imagined that we'd be this much dispensing when it comes to military

    • @baespa
      @baespa 2 года назад +77

      Poor Italy had to be forced into war by their leader

    • @konvoker
      @konvoker 2 года назад +139

      Yes that's amazing.... But thinking about how our troops where equipped during the first world war with cardboard boots and this kind of stuff makes me wonder... The money where "put" there but as always in our country most of it ended up in a few pockets I guess

    • @CraigMCox
      @CraigMCox 2 года назад +14

      Do you still have to keep receipts for buying coffee in Italy? I remember that rule when I was there. Was an anti-corruption measure

    • @snickerpls5111
      @snickerpls5111 2 года назад +10

      @@CraigMCox I remembered being a thing like... 10 years ago or something, but as of right now it's mostly not required. It technically still IS required to acquire it after purchase, but not to hold it

    • @snickerpls5111
      @snickerpls5111 2 года назад +7

      @@konvoker Un po come si sta rivelando essere l'invasione russa in ucraina. Tutto fumo, poco arrosto a causa di fondi monetari nascosti/rubati dagli alti ranghi

  • @KrwawyLeon
    @KrwawyLeon 2 года назад +870

    1938, Poland and the USA have an equal military budget. Crazy times.

    • @shturm9391
      @shturm9391 2 года назад +36

      The US didn't have any treats.

    • @turdferguson3803
      @turdferguson3803 2 года назад +220

      Poland had a very large army and considerable airforce, they weren't a pushover like people think they were. They were just isolated from all their allies so they were helpless once war started.

    • @shturm9391
      @shturm9391 2 года назад +25

      @@turdferguson3803 just the US had and pretty small army, they didn't have literally any treats like I said. Polish army was nothing compared to the other European forces

    • @JohnnyReb1976
      @JohnnyReb1976 2 года назад +28

      They were doing OK before communism screwed them over.

    • @lordpolish2727
      @lordpolish2727 2 года назад +64

      @@shturm9391 literally nothing? The Polish army was over a million strong, and who is this “other European forces”?

  • @carylee8913
    @carylee8913 8 месяцев назад +2

    usa seems like being ready to fight against aliens😅

  • @FijiVitii
    @FijiVitii 11 месяцев назад

    nice!

  • @joellugg9183
    @joellugg9183 2 года назад +1264

    I would be really interested in seeing defense spending as a percentage of GDP, in similar graph form.

    • @lorainisrael
      @lorainisrael 2 года назад +57

      It would be more interesting for me to see it against minimum wages. Because in Russia the minimum pay might be lower comparing to GDP than say in the UK. It is one thing to spend a lot on military when your people are wealthy, another thing when they are kept poor no matter how much money the country has.

    • @scufidon
      @scufidon 2 года назад +10

      @@lorainisrael Then it is necessary to compare all laws and social programs. In general, it seems to me that most of the data from the video, as well as GDP, have a very large error

    • @Mika-85
      @Mika-85 2 года назад +19

      @@lorainisrael there's absolutely no point. And it's not possible. As many countries, such as the US don't even have a nationwide minimum wage.

    • @RunPJs
      @RunPJs 2 года назад

      @@lorainisrael it's possible to compare similar defence equipment.
      Definitely get more for the $ in poorer countries

    • @HTMangaka
      @HTMangaka 2 года назад +5

      What fascinates me is: China, a country with 5 times our population, has a military 1/4th as advanced as ours. O_O

  • @stuartmynard
    @stuartmynard Год назад +733

    These are amazing. It would be cool to include the major conflicts and wars that were happening on a timeline of some sort. You can see major events like WWI and WWII and the Cold War but it's really interesting to see the expenditure build up well before those events. Great work as always and thank you!

    • @burgherwithfrenchspies
      @burgherwithfrenchspies Год назад +24

      Just know the years of most of these major conflicts and your good

    • @LycanFerret
      @LycanFerret Год назад +15

      You can also see 9/11 where the U.S spending massively shoots up during late 2001.

    • @RandomDudeOne
      @RandomDudeOne Год назад +12

      Interesting that at the end of the video US is spending more on defense than the other countries combined, but military spending as a percentage of US GDP, it is a fraction of what the US was spending during the Cold War. That's just how massive the US economy is.

    • @tejedestinos-petonboostead6733
      @tejedestinos-petonboostead6733 Год назад +5

      Or you can go read something instead of watching EVERYTHING on yt

    • @LycanFerret
      @LycanFerret Год назад +5

      @@tejedestinos-petonboostead6733 What's the difference between reading a compilation of what someone found and then wrote about, and watching a compilation of what someone found and then made a video about? Both are secondary and tertiary sources. Just a different medium. And unfortunately for us, a primary source on military spending over 100 years ago will be impossible to find. We barely have news articles from that time period still around. Things just weren't documented as well, so the majority of the human race consumes what other people found and takes the knowledge as their own.
      Really that's how learning works if you think about it. Because if we all had to relearn how to do stuff with no help from our progenitors we'd never have passed the stone age. Just watching and reading things others have found and made into a more consumable format, for hundreds of millions of years. Only a rare few each century making a new invention or find using primary sources.

  • @Disturbedmelloow
    @Disturbedmelloow Год назад

    I get increasing, but did they sell too? Since it's decreasing often?

  • @christosgravias7976
    @christosgravias7976 11 дней назад

    Pre Cold War, most exciting graph i've ever seen

  • @genericusername568
    @genericusername568 Год назад +1877

    Poland being in top 3 for any amount of time is impressive
    Edit: I hate these people to but wow I have never got 50 likes before and I get 1.9k!? Thanks so much

    • @exocet8834
      @exocet8834 Год назад +43

      Basically 1947-50

    • @bidehelfensiemir4538
      @bidehelfensiemir4538 Год назад

      any amount of time, shure 🤪🤡 are you on drugs?

    • @Ledzinskii
      @Ledzinskii Год назад +21

      @@exocet8834 the fuk u talking about xd 1965 1973

    • @Ledzinskii
      @Ledzinskii Год назад +15

      @@exocet8834 its like most of the time top 10

    • @rom2387
      @rom2387 Год назад +25

      в составе СССР))

  • @beastchode4916
    @beastchode4916 Год назад +545

    Germany: *Raises military spending*
    Rest of the World: 👀

    • @BabsJohnson111
      @BabsJohnson111 Год назад +34

      We did so again since 2022 but I promise we are on the good side this time

    • @VSMSusi
      @VSMSusi Год назад +28

      @@BabsJohnson111 **does blitzkrieg**

    • @akhandbharat1593
      @akhandbharat1593 Год назад +4

      @@BabsJohnson111 you have no gas to get through winter, we aren't even concerned about Germany anymore

    • @nein236
      @nein236 Год назад

      @@BabsJohnson111 Bevor wir wirklich in den Krieg ziehen, haben wir hier einen Bürgerkrieg.
      "Gute Seite". Keine Seite ist hier gut. Wir sind Ami-Puppen, selber wird in Deutschland sowieso nichts entschieden.
      Und Bolschewismus ist der gleiche Dreck wie Nationalsozialismus.
      Warum Lenin?

    • @SpaceRaptor510
      @SpaceRaptor510 Год назад +1

      @@BabsJohnson111 I mean I would mind a german world dictatorship personally

  • @saransathish321saran9
    @saransathish321saran9 Год назад

    I need the preprocessed data for my visualization purposes so please help me with the data set

  • @The_Only_Pickle
    @The_Only_Pickle 9 месяцев назад +1

    Not the hoi4 music 💀

  • @treyalexanderson605
    @treyalexanderson605 2 года назад +33

    World: Okay US you won the cold war it’s time to stop
    US in the 2000s: *Goes Super Saiyan 3*

  • @jackscully7986
    @jackscully7986 2 года назад +1903

    This is mind-boggling. Imagine if we, as a species, could direct these resources to something more fruitful.

    • @jozsefkati9342
      @jozsefkati9342 2 года назад +262

      Unfortunately there is a saying...peace doesn't pay.

    • @biggusdickus1792
      @biggusdickus1792 2 года назад +216

      Oddly enough, many technologies are a direct result of war, like the telegram. War is in our blood, always has been.

    • @Bouhlvay
      @Bouhlvay 2 года назад +131

      Peace sells... But who's buying?

    • @tylertrii9865
      @tylertrii9865 2 года назад +69

      It is, we have learned so much science do to war.

    • @j.c.denton2312
      @j.c.denton2312 2 года назад +67

      @@Bouhlvay the US military actually funded the creation of the internet

  • @aaronwhite1929
    @aaronwhite1929 Год назад

    Do the spending numbers include military aid sent to other countries?

  • @toniee98
    @toniee98 Год назад

    love how Brazil does quick appearances in the list just to go down again

  • @soerensans2375
    @soerensans2375 2 года назад +38

    Germany over night: Hold my 100 Billion

  • @LesLess
    @LesLess 2 года назад +1674

    "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed...The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities." President Dwight Eisenhower (1953)

    • @gybx4094
      @gybx4094 2 года назад +231

      Eisenhower was a rare man.
      A 5-star General who learned to despise war.
      He warned us in his farewell speech.

    • @skyguytomas9615
      @skyguytomas9615 2 года назад +70

      @@gybx4094 Eisenhower may have been a rare one, but he wasn't anti war in office. Most of his involvements were followed the anti-communist rhetoric of the day, which saw little opposition domestically.

    • @muse2182
      @muse2182 2 года назад +85

      Words are cheap. Quotes are cheaper

    • @alucardcount9478
      @alucardcount9478 2 года назад +4

      Boo hoo

    • @spiritualawakening2675
      @spiritualawakening2675 2 года назад +33

      @@muse2182 with your bar set that high, who have you voted for in recent presidential elections? There hasn't been a presidential candidate with character in 50 years. They've all been sworn in on empty words.

  • @G6JPG
    @G6JPG 6 месяцев назад

    It'd be interesting to see one showing such spend as percentage of GDP.

  • @ubiwrongcomeatme3452
    @ubiwrongcomeatme3452 8 месяцев назад

    Newsroom opening didn't lie.

  • @subhashishbagchi3191
    @subhashishbagchi3191 2 года назад +517

    Top 5 countries according to their military expenditure in 2020
    1. USA - $731 Billion
    2. China - $261 Billion
    3. India - $71 Billion
    4. Russia -$65 Billion
    5. Saudi Arabia- $ 61 Billion

    • @eliwhite5548
      @eliwhite5548 2 года назад +181

      Top 10 countries according to military spending as a percentage of GDP:
      1. Oman 10.9%
      2. Saudi Arabia 8.4%
      3. Algeria 6.7%
      4. Kuwait 6.5%
      5. Israel 5.6%
      6. Azerbaijan 5.4%
      7. Jordan 5%
      8. Armenia 4.9%
      9. Morocco 4.3%
      10. Russia 4.3%
      Bonus:
      16. US 3.7%

    • @tyty-xm8fw
      @tyty-xm8fw 2 года назад +126

      @@eliwhite5548 yeah I feel like people overestimate how much money the US is spending on its military. It's not spending very much compared to its GDP.

    • @bangladeshball5644
      @bangladeshball5644 2 года назад +115

      2022( Recent)
      1. USA= 801 Billion
      2. China=292 Billion
      3.India=76 Billion
      4.Russia= 64 Billion
      5. United Kingdom = 59 Billion

    • @ProtiumPower
      @ProtiumPower 2 года назад +40

      Germany is now going to be 3rd.

    • @tyty-xm8fw
      @tyty-xm8fw 2 года назад +42

      @@wontonz6129 yes but the United States also fights conflicts all over the world. The US military also has huge research and development pushes.

  • @akshat8252
    @akshat8252 2 года назад +496

    India after 2014 :
    This seems interesting, imma going to join this

    • @akshat8252
      @akshat8252 2 года назад +21

      @Ashish Mishra so you want china to rule us

    • @eternaldragon7392
      @eternaldragon7392 2 года назад +33

      @@akshat8252 if you are saying that we should wage a war against china
      We can't
      Not beacuse we can't win
      Beacuse of
      No first attack policy
      We have a 100 billion dollar trade with China wich would be sanctioned if we wage wars
      Non participation of allies because we waged war
      Various geo politics involved with war
      China can (will) wage war against us but we are far more prepared then we were during indo-sino war
      Borders have fortified
      Equipments upgraded
      Military entrenched
      Also I would like to say IAF is much more advanced than Chinese air force along our borders

    • @akshat8252
      @akshat8252 2 года назад +14

      @@eternaldragon7392 we have defence because of that it might be challenging for them to defeat us if they attacked us. We have seen what happened to Tibet.
      We need best army

    • @akshatpiyush2835
      @akshatpiyush2835 2 года назад

      @@akshat8252 Your name is same as me bro 😊

    • @wh2960
      @wh2960 2 года назад +8

      @@akshat8252 spend money on the military so hard that your people go into poverty

  • @crow2989
    @crow2989 9 месяцев назад

    exactly what u was looking for

  • @alexstm5784
    @alexstm5784 7 месяцев назад

    At the end it is always the economy that effect the military spending

  • @badassat69
    @badassat69 2 года назад +15

    Masterpiece!!! One of the 3 best videos I have seen this year so far. It is like watching, during 10 minutes, the military evolution of 1 1/2 centuries, it's like watching history unfold. Thank you, RankingCharts.

  • @shturm602
    @shturm602 2 года назад +993

    I just love how throughout the late 90s and early 00s Japan, a country whose constitution technically prohibits it from having a military, had the second highest spending

    • @birdofgrey6542
      @birdofgrey6542 2 года назад +130

      They're not prohibited from a having a military. They just can't have a standing army.

    • @TysonJensen
      @TysonJensen 2 года назад +276

      They are prohibited from spending more than 1% of their money on defense. They spend the full amount allowed each year. What the chart shows is the massive economic engine Japan had built!

    • @corbintodd9339
      @corbintodd9339 2 года назад +131

      @@birdofgrey6542 also not true. They can’t have an “offensive” military. But they’re actually amending their constitution to allow for that now

    • @XXX3155
      @XXX3155 2 года назад +16

      @@birdofgrey6542 Isn't a standing army the same thing as a military

    • @TheAmbex
      @TheAmbex 2 года назад +88

      They were prohibited from having a military that was geared towards offense, hence why its called the JSDF or Japanese Self Defense Force.

  • @Deere55
    @Deere55 Год назад

    The Hearts of Iron 4 music was genius for this

  • @npkashyap
    @npkashyap Год назад

    How did you make this video?

  • @tjek12345
    @tjek12345 Год назад +223

    That drop in the USSR's spending from 1988 to 1989 was intense

    • @jakeiota
      @jakeiota Год назад +40

      Considering what was happening then in the country - it is not surprising

    • @tgburn6984
      @tgburn6984 Год назад +56

      Because of Gorbachev he focused on people's happiness than strengthening the military but it bite him in the back

    • @tgburn6984
      @tgburn6984 Год назад +7

      @@Wicker_ I would love to see gorbachev ruling ussr than what happened after dissolution of ussr

    • @2298839082508923859
      @2298839082508923859 Год назад +57

      @@tgburn6984When are creating artificial famine and total destruction of Soviet industry and economy became "people happiness"?
      My relatives were riding over 200 km to my parents every week just to take some food, because there wasn't any in the cities.
      Gorbachev and his "perestroika" killed thousands and ruined lives of billions in Russia and all ex-Soviet republics.
      Literally worst thing that happened with russians, even Hitler's invasion was less devastating...

    • @pavelmorozov6599
      @pavelmorozov6599 Год назад +12

      Because you know the Soviet union was collapsing.

  • @Landskron1969
    @Landskron1969 2 года назад +118

    "Top 10 Countries by Health Care spending."

    • @rais1953
      @rais1953 2 года назад +30

      US is the highest. Its results are among the worst in the OECD.

    • @maxbond2824
      @maxbond2824 2 года назад +22

      US is still the biggest spender there.... by far

    • @TheEpicLJ
      @TheEpicLJ 2 года назад +5

      35 percent the military is only 17

    • @wraspita
      @wraspita 2 года назад

      Per capita at least, and a kpi for efficiency. Otherwise, the US wins by sheer size.

  • @trees3987
    @trees3987 Месяц назад

    crazy how they recovered so fast, they were very advanced in a lot of fields but we don’t learn about it

  • @jalapenoofjustice4682
    @jalapenoofjustice4682 8 месяцев назад

    we need a "gas gas gas" meme in here

  • @teslaromans1023
    @teslaromans1023 2 года назад +60

    I love how you can see the world events happening just by looking at the dynamics of those spendings

    • @IBlackE
      @IBlackE Год назад

      Yup...once the 1930s came about I knew Nazi Germany was going to dramatic appearance and sure enough by 1937 it went to the top.

  • @carterzhang2977
    @carterzhang2977 2 года назад +27

    Nice video 👍 thanks for doing it with historical countries

  • @neugs1807
    @neugs1807 6 месяцев назад +14

    Pearl Harbor: Occurs
    US Military Budget: And I took that personally. 📈

  • @BOMBON187
    @BOMBON187 2 года назад +18

    1989 USA: Has activated infinite money cheat code

  • @youtwat6525
    @youtwat6525 2 года назад +324

    France looking at Germany spending $12,000,000,000 and taking Austria in 1938: This is fine

    • @louisxcxv1905
      @louisxcxv1905 2 года назад +15

      Actually no, and in 1934 our PM will contact the english PM stating that "with the current rise lf the german military, I (French PM) believe that the only option given to us will be war. And we would be wise to do it now, when they have nothing, than to do it when they have regarhered their strengths".
      The english answer will be clear "Nothing will happen with germany as they have signed diplomatic agreements"... yeah, that worked out...

    • @eurobass8665
      @eurobass8665 2 года назад +6

      Chuckles „im in danger“

    • @fkjl4717
      @fkjl4717 2 года назад +3

      @@louisxcxv1905 what about Munich deal? French PM become stupid pretty fast.

    • @louisxcxv1905
      @louisxcxv1905 2 года назад +8

      @@fkjl4717 yeah, really not sure you can say that when your PM was Chamberlain...
      After coming back from the munich treaty Chamberlain clamored to all who could hear "I saved the peace in Europe!" And daladier (french PM) will say when seeing his compatriots congratulate him "fools I bring you war and you dont realize it".
      The french PM will change before WW2.

    • @fkjl4717
      @fkjl4717 2 года назад +2

      @@louisxcxv1905 it matters what he did, not what he sad.
      P.S. my PM was Stalin:)

  • @user-cz1nt6is5v
    @user-cz1nt6is5v 7 месяцев назад

    BGM好き

  • @DocesCremosos
    @DocesCremosos Год назад +1

    I'm a simple man i saw Brasil and i like the video

  • @robtheg
    @robtheg 2 года назад +12

    4:38 United States was like "hold my beer" 😂

  • @guywithknife
    @guywithknife Год назад +62

    Would love to see this with inflation adjusted dollars so we can better compare spend throughout the years and not just relative spend to other countries

    • @odizzido
      @odizzido Год назад +3

      It would also be interesting to see the actual purchase power of each dollar spent. One dollar in the soviet union is worth more than one dollar in the states.

  • @user-gx6zm5wj8s
    @user-gx6zm5wj8s Год назад

    Please compare with BC, does it make sense for 1870?

  • @Luckypew
    @Luckypew 8 месяцев назад

    It's also very interesting that there are other countries that are spending less than a third than what the US is, and still their military power is coming close. If this budget was cut in half We would still almost the same as the other topic countries combined

    • @Me-fm9zk
      @Me-fm9zk 8 месяцев назад

      Everyone spend their military budget on national defense, US does not. US military is an exportable national product that they sell to other countries, and they profit from it. Don’t be fooled, no one gives anything for free, or spends something without benefiting from it. US is the biggest capitalist country in the world.

    • @bluntcabbage6042
      @bluntcabbage6042 8 месяцев назад +1

      Because US workers and personnel are paid more, and the American dollar goes further in other countries. Rudimentary knowledge on currency helps when you're comparing budgets.

  • @emiljeziorski9923
    @emiljeziorski9923 Год назад +407

    The film indicates that Poland in 1938 had military expenditures of $1,000,000,000. But that's probably a mistake. The entire Polish budget in 1938 was about $500,000,000.
    So it was 1,000,000,000, but PLN.
    In 1971, for example, it is correct. But you have to remember that the expenses are converted according to the official $/PLN exchange rate. $1 for 4 PLN, when on the black market it was about 100 PLN for one dollar.

    • @herisuryadi6885
      @herisuryadi6885 Год назад +37

      Eh might've been adjusted to today's dollar

    • @10054
      @10054 Год назад +72

      It's been adjusted to today's current inflation.

    • @PBMS123
      @PBMS123 Год назад +12

      The values appear to have been adjusted for inflation, so these are showing relative spending in today's dollars.

    • @emiljeziorski9923
      @emiljeziorski9923 Год назад +8

      @@PBMS123 I don't think so, because the 1971 value for Poland is marked correctly. That's what it was in dollars without taking inflation into account.

    • @emiljeziorski9923
      @emiljeziorski9923 Год назад +13

      @@PBMS123 Polish military budget in 1938 was PLN 1,000,000,000. Which is about $191,000,000 in 1938. Adjusted for inflation, by 2021 it should be $3,500,000,000.

  • @Ramash440
    @Ramash440 2 года назад +255

    France in the 20th Century : "We're a victim of military expansion and the ambition of our neighbors."
    France in the 19th Century :

    • @victuz
      @victuz 2 года назад +2

      Yeah? How about A World With No Boundaries?

    • @Ramash440
      @Ramash440 2 года назад +1

      @@victuz 7 nukes weren't enough.

    • @ommsterlitz1805
      @ommsterlitz1805 2 года назад +2

      France spending 20 times less than Germany and losing Battle of France how strange they really didn't though Germany would attack AT ALL.

    • @yolomax
      @yolomax 2 года назад +2

      @@ommsterlitz1805 yknow its mostly cuz they intended to first help the poolish and prepare themselves first but then the polish lost a bit quick...

    • @ommsterlitz1805
      @ommsterlitz1805 2 года назад +6

      @@yolomax Polish had cavalry units against tanks ffs, France was in a political turmoil since the late 1920's with communist and facists trying to take power, add to that massive strikes in military factories because the people didn't wanted another war add the stupid political journals influencing the common folks, 75 yo + generals at the head of your army with ww1 tactics and you get recipe for the 1940 disaster.

  • @izzino6794
    @izzino6794 Год назад +1

    Would be cool to see it but in % of their gdp

  • @emmanuelguetta182
    @emmanuelguetta182 10 месяцев назад

    Can it be possible that you make Ana no matin about crypto currencies marketcap or price