Does GOD Exist? Oxford Mathematician Shares His View - Brillant!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 фев 2025

Комментарии • 41

  • @Per-ThoreStene
    @Per-ThoreStene 8 дней назад +16

    What makes the christian interpretation of religion the correct religion? Why not the flying spaghetti monster?

    • @jamiesimms7084
      @jamiesimms7084 6 дней назад +1

      You're not serious, do you just perpetuate ridiculous exchanges

    • @Per-ThoreStene
      @Per-ThoreStene 6 дней назад

      @jamiesimms7084 yes I am serious. I only ask because I dont know the answer to this question. But if you do, please educate me.

    • @majestic-domination
      @majestic-domination 6 дней назад +5

      @@jamiesimms7084 It's a valid question. The christian perspective can be dismissed as any other perspective unless you have absolute proof to show otherwise.

    • @NGTOpTicFaZe
      @NGTOpTicFaZe 5 дней назад

      ​@Per-ThoreStene Because of historical, non-biblical accounts from hundreds of sources of Christ and His miracles. Read "The Case for Christ" by Lee Strobel

    • @heinpereboom5521
      @heinpereboom5521 5 дней назад

      This is the question asked by anyone who has not yet spent a minute studying the Bible.

  • @johnhammond6423
    @johnhammond6423 8 дней назад +10

    John Lennox, the worlds leading bloviation expert.

  • @AlethicAvenger
    @AlethicAvenger 6 дней назад +13

    Lennox's presentation, while delivered eloquently, relies on several flawed arguments. he conflates origins and operation, uses "God of the gaps" reasoning, misrepresents scientific views, appeals to authority, misunderstands evolutionary theory, presents a non sequitur regarding morality, and fails to adequately address the problem of evil. his personal testimony, while sincere, does not constitute objective evidence for the existence of God. while Lennox presents his views as "razor-sharp logic," a closer examination reveals significant weaknesses in his reasoning.

  • @mormorgranat
    @mormorgranat 4 дня назад +1

    Argh I close this and search for the video. Can't stand that you add music to it, like it adds any emotional effect that people crave. His words are good by themselves thank you

  • @heinpereboom5521
    @heinpereboom5521 5 дней назад +2

    Why was this film put on the internet?
    for the annoying music or for the story of John Lennox?
    Stop with this idiotic music, it is the biggest disease of film makers, that they think this is necessary.
    I have learned that it is uncivilized to make noise when someone is talking.

    • @ServiceProcess
      @ServiceProcess 5 дней назад

      @heinpereboom5521 I'm in absolute agreement, we are supposed to be focused on the presentation and then someone introduces the background music
      the whole way through. Not clever.

    • @heinpereboom5521
      @heinpereboom5521 4 дня назад +1

      @@ServiceProcess
      Thanks for your response, I thought I was the only one bothered by this music.

  • @BubbaF0wpend
    @BubbaF0wpend 6 дней назад +5

    And his opinion on the existence of god definitely counts more because he's an "oxford mathematician" amrite, totally relevant!😅

  • @LisztianGR
    @LisztianGR 5 дней назад +1

    Eloquence alone does not a valid point make. I was expecting a retort by Dawkins and instead lost my time on an old man’s incoherent rumblings.

  • @rogergeyer9851
    @rogergeyer9851 8 дней назад +11

    Stop the nonsense. Stating an opinion, sans real evidence, isn't "obliterating" anything.
    Neither does empty appeal to authority, re those who happen to believe like you do, without meaningful evidence.
    Total clickbait title.

  • @firedome8
    @firedome8 3 дня назад +1

    Lennox is just a confused tv preacher.

  • @DisRespectoids
    @DisRespectoids 4 дня назад

    John Lennox - “i believe in god”
    John Lennon - “imagine there’s no heaven”

  • @rickhobby4180
    @rickhobby4180 3 дня назад

    There is sufficient evidence that Jesus is God and Christianity is true

  • @michaelsmith9866
    @michaelsmith9866 4 дня назад

    Definitely not what it said on the box. Click bait

  • @SimonBarrett-ry9cb
    @SimonBarrett-ry9cb 6 дней назад

    He flits from one scientific quote to another in the same breath without reading further into the science behind such quotes. Christians like him use the bible in the same way , fliting from one place to other totally unassociated place to build a text that supports a line of thinking that they see as proof that the bible contains everything we need to know. Any long book could be used in a similar manner.
    If man is made in gods image, defacto man is god??? Crazy or nonsensical. But if you talk fast enough like all these evangelists do, so that reasoning a response becomes impossible, because like the scatter gun, stoccato phrases flung like fake pearls before swine become impossible to answer logically because there is no original logic in the scattering or the statements. He purports like Uriah Heep to be humble and contrite before his fellows but it is actually a veiled, vicious tirade worthy of a chief propergandist of some facistic order. He is a very dangerous man because he will try to convince you black is grey and white is magnolia in the wide eyed world of evangelical blizzard speak.
    Bible wisdom? I think not. Therefore I am. To quote loosely like evangelicals.

  • @essakhan-oh2vh
    @essakhan-oh2vh 7 дней назад

    If not exist then why to discuss .😮

    • @carlrodalegrado4104
      @carlrodalegrado4104 6 дней назад +1

      Because you need to discuss everything as much as possible to verify the truth as close as possible

  • @WisdomWeaverBitcoinBruv
    @WisdomWeaverBitcoinBruv 6 дней назад +1

    I never understand arguments that are prefixed with "Oxford Mathematician" (or some other grand title). Whether you're a freshly minted school janitor at a run-down school or a Nobel laureate, everyone can share their views, but not a single person is closer to anyone else on the planet to knowing how things are beyond our own limited perspective. It's all guesswork.

    • @childfreesingleandatheist8899
      @childfreesingleandatheist8899 5 дней назад

      I do think that “appealing to authority or prestige” is a fallacy. However, just because two different competing hypotheses can’t prove something as a fact, it does not mean both are on equal terms. One usually has the burden of proof and to this day, it’s the scientific method what works best to get to the truth, not blind faith. So in my personal opinion, it’s atheism that has the upper hand by an enormous amount.

  • @essakhan-oh2vh
    @essakhan-oh2vh 7 дней назад

    When there is much oppression cruelty injustice and the likes this type of things about God takes through and through out history see it Before the fall of Bagdad in the last days of Abbasids such were, the situation-was such on the rise on the one hand the heaps of accumulated wealth and on the other poverty moral decadence and the discussions about God weather he does exist what language he speak why arabia icj is the language of Quran and all sorts of nonsense questions. what the was the ultimate result . In the words of our good Christian brother “. in our recent history Islam was brought to the verge of destruction two times but each time Islam emerged more powerful than ever . Do your business as usual and see the catastrophic annihilation by your good master Nethenyahu as there is no one the most wise than you . But see .

  • @essakhan-oh2vh
    @essakhan-oh2vh 7 дней назад +1

    This is one way how to get fame and money. .

  • @sasanmers9529
    @sasanmers9529 6 дней назад

    Fart