Thats a stunt double doing the fights, Lee only did the close ups and shots that required no footwork. Alas, if you meant the character of Dooku, then hell yes he was a badass duelist.
I can't see why people in the industry complained about digital film-making. So much faster. Thinking that a film would need to be sent lab to be developed before they could even start working on it (and make sure it's good) is archaic and like cave painting.
While it is great to see how it all comes together, would it not be far more practical just to have them fight and have a string yank Obi-Wan out of the scene? I could only think of the dozens of man hours spent on that tiny scene that could've come to better uses. Plus the entire system seems a little disjointed, and the problems if a tape gets destroyed before it can be copied is monstrous.
That backdrop they put to cut out Obi-Wan also took Anakin out, which completely broke the flow of the duel, leaving me wondering why Anakin wouldnt strike Dooku from behind while he was Force-pushing Obi-Wan. Turns out he was in front and far away. Plus all the stupid reaction shots of Palpatine break the flow as well, i'd much rather see a single cohesive sequence of lightsaber choreography. With all due respect, but they couldve done a much better editing job.
+Eric Pellinen We've already arrived; the industry is shooting predominantly digital now. A few privileged directors and DPs can still argue for film over digital, and while there's definitely space for both mediums artistically, the torch has effectively been passed, particularly with film stocks being discontinued and the like. It's not that digital's "better," but it's been a learning process to take advantage of its strengths and handling its weakness over/versus film, and those who are fortunate enough to be able to choose to stay on film are doing so out of familiarity as much as an aesthetic difference. IMO, my eye's gone from being able to spot digital to more now just spotting a bad or overdone color grade - for example, I thought Jurassic World looked nasty and "digital," but it was mostly 35 mm and 65 mm film, with a bit shot in 6K digitally - the color grade was more of my objection than the actual photographic medium, and I find that's the common pattern nowadays. Opinion having being said - Episodes II and III look like really, really, really bad digital.
It's amazing to see how this film was edited.
It's so much more complicated than one might think, right? :)
"Are you making a movie?" :))
for someone who was in his mid 80s, count dooku can really swing a lightsaber
Thats a stunt double doing the fights, Lee only did the close ups and shots that required no footwork. Alas, if you meant the character of Dooku, then hell yes he was a badass duelist.
Henry14arsenal2007 get wooshed bitch
CaptainJackeye You’re so funny -_-
I really hope these negatives are being preserved
2:29 George checking on Disney
Hi Ben! Hi George!!
Hi Mark.
@@fortblocks Mark was in previous trilogy.
If you mean the Blu-ray release no, it's not included. It came from the bonus disc of the DVD release.
I love star wars!
Me too.
I can't see why people in the industry complained about digital film-making. So much faster. Thinking that a film would need to be sent lab to be developed before they could even start working on it (and make sure it's good) is archaic and like cave painting.
Probably the aesthetic of real film compared to digital film
@@TTF1996 which makes no difference to a viewer
@@YDGx1138 exactly
@@YDGx1138 it does to many of us actually. It's a preference since both digital and film look vastly different.
@@YDGx1138 😂😂😂fucking no
Awesome Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith Video.
Big thanks!!! I'm a big fan of yours... YOU ARE THE MAN!!! :D
4:36 did not expect to hear the THX sound there.
Thank you for uploading the videos, i haven't seen it yet!
I need more of jett sally's voice in my life
thanks
1:59 3:02 It's interesting to see all the cut choreography from the Dooku fight.
I'd love to hear the story of reel two, dialogue track two...
Good luck finding it. That American Graffiti stuff is lost forever.
dang VHS
Wow. Fancy computers they have there
Are you making a movie?
Digital on analogue tape...mmmm
2K resolution you meant, which is Full HD 1080P.
Now no tape use in production anymore. NAS and servers use in post production which is fully digital. In somecases still use tape .
How's it going? :P
@Zebonka That's one terrible mental image. I don't need to be thinking about the Hedgehog when I watch Star Wars.
A little too far in a few places
play xox
While it is great to see how it all comes together, would it not be far more practical just to have them fight and have a string yank Obi-Wan out of the scene?
I could only think of the dozens of man hours spent on that tiny scene that could've come to better uses. Plus the entire system seems a little disjointed, and the problems if a tape gets destroyed before it can be copied is monstrous.
fix it in post dude.
That backdrop they put to cut out Obi-Wan also took Anakin out, which completely broke the flow of the duel, leaving me wondering why Anakin wouldnt strike Dooku from behind while he was Force-pushing Obi-Wan. Turns out he was in front and far away. Plus all the stupid reaction shots of Palpatine break the flow as well, i'd much rather see a single cohesive sequence of lightsaber choreography. With all due respect, but they couldve done a much better editing job.
Henry14arsenal2007 Didn’t he kick Anakin from behind?
Why does this have so many likes? I've never noticed this and I've watched the movie over 100 times
was it a really necessity to give Dooku a cgi head?
Considering it wasn't Christopher Lee I'd say yeah.
these webisodes are better than the prequels!
Adam Levine the movies are fine, if you cant ignore some flaws I pity you as a Star Wars Fan.Bye loser
No, they are not.
Film still is way better than digital. I give digital 10 more years until it's quality becomes film's equal.
+Eric Pellinen We've already arrived; the industry is shooting predominantly digital now. A few privileged directors and DPs can still argue for film over digital, and while there's definitely space for both mediums artistically, the torch has effectively been passed, particularly with film stocks being discontinued and the like. It's not that digital's "better," but it's been a learning process to take advantage of its strengths and handling its weakness over/versus film, and those who are fortunate enough to be able to choose to stay on film are doing so out of familiarity as much as an aesthetic difference. IMO, my eye's gone from being able to spot digital to more now just spotting a bad or overdone color grade - for example, I thought Jurassic World looked nasty and "digital," but it was mostly 35 mm and 65 mm film, with a bit shot in 6K digitally - the color grade was more of my objection than the actual photographic medium, and I find that's the common pattern nowadays. Opinion having being said - Episodes II and III look like really, really, really bad digital.
Yo it’s 9 years later. Is it equal now?
It's great that episode 7 is not been filmed on digital
Nat Morgan Rogue One has been, though.
iLikeTheUDK woah this comment is a year old 😂
Notification Squad
Moon ?
Good work. Four words for the use of 35mm there and for Rian Johnson's Star Wars film: returning to it's roots.
Who cares. I don't want film looking like it's been shot on a mobile phone.