A psychologist's casual review:Borderline, narcissistic and schizoid adaptations by Elinor Greenberg

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 авг 2024

Комментарии • 20

  • @carmelle2665
    @carmelle2665 Месяц назад +8

    it’s so beautiful the way you described this
    very warm and fuzzy

  • @dnorby100
    @dnorby100 Месяц назад +2

    Your interpretations and break downs are sooo good! Amazing! Thank you!!

  • @SchizoidVision
    @SchizoidVision Месяц назад +7

    Great to hear your review of this book. Very true that she is clear in her explanations.

    • @talkingpsychology
      @talkingpsychology  Месяц назад +4

      Thank you. Here explanations are top notch and very accessible which is a breath of fresh air in the field of psychodynamic theory.

    • @SchizoidVision
      @SchizoidVision Месяц назад +3

      @@talkingpsychology Yes, I like when she said that her work is free of 'Jargonese' :)

    • @talkingpsychology
      @talkingpsychology  Месяц назад +4

      @@SchizoidVision really love that word!

  • @ClusterBombed01
    @ClusterBombed01 Месяц назад +6

    Sounds like an excellent book!

    • @talkingpsychology
      @talkingpsychology  Месяц назад +4

      Yes it absolutely is and I highly recommend it ! Thanks for your engagement!

  • @amareamore1693
    @amareamore1693 Месяц назад +5

    Thank you for your book recomendation also your review about the book. I keep enriching my window of knowledge about psychoanalysis from your reviews😊

    • @talkingpsychology
      @talkingpsychology  Месяц назад +3

      I am happy to know my work is useful to you. Thanks!

  • @lapislazulis2378
    @lapislazulis2378 Месяц назад +2

    I definitely need to read this one!

  • @anamouchette5588
    @anamouchette5588 Месяц назад +3

    This is great!!! Thank you, I got the book.

  • @revontulet1845
    @revontulet1845 Месяц назад +1

    I love your channel. Are you an INFP? I wonder what you think of the Myers-Briggs types? Really interesting review, you discuss concepts in a stimulating way

    • @talkingpsychology
      @talkingpsychology  Месяц назад +2

      @@revontulet1845 thanks for your comment and positif feedback! I am an INTJ-T, I personally like the Myers-Briggs test as it is a first step in understanding one's personality and it can be food for thought. But I don't use it in a clinical settings as it isn't as precise as the MMPI-3 or the Rorschach with a TAT.

    • @revontulet1845
      @revontulet1845 Месяц назад +1

      @@talkingpsychology Somehow I'm often mistaking INTJs and INFPs! I'm INTP and I have a channel discussing this and general psychometrics. I'm very skeptical of the Rorschach and TAT, but would be interested to hear more about why you use it and its general application. I'm not a clinical psychologist, but I find it fascinating. I would love to interview you on my channel sometime. Or just discuss these ideas!

    • @talkingpsychology
      @talkingpsychology  Месяц назад +1

      @@revontulet1845 yes I can understand why people would be skeptical of the Rorschach and TAT. I used to use them earlier on in my career but nowadays I rely more on my clinical 'intuition' and 'knowledge' than on personnality tests. However I am by no means a psychometric expert and my understanding is that the French usage and interpretation of the Personality test are different from how there are used in other countries. It would be a pleasure to talk or be interviewed on your channel. Please feel free to email me if you want to. Thanks again!