Pakistan introduces Type 54AP frigate: Tughril, built in China. It outclasses PLA's own frigates

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 дек 2024

Комментарии • 72

  • @tariqsyed445
    @tariqsyed445 2 года назад +23

    Very well described lecture. Complete coverage, filled with useful information.

  • @nostradamus2642
    @nostradamus2642 2 года назад +36

    The 8 Yuan class AIP SSK will make the Indian navy tremble in fear.

    • @anooprpillai4709
      @anooprpillai4709 2 года назад +5

      In dreams

    • @anooprpillai4709
      @anooprpillai4709 2 года назад +2

      @@reaper6531 first you get some money before you begg.. we have own nuclear submarines

    • @reaper6531
      @reaper6531 2 года назад

      @@anooprpillai4709 ente bro India aanu 6SSN indakunnathu. Swayam kuthi nanamkeduthalle 😂

    • @anooprpillai4709
      @anooprpillai4709 2 года назад +3

      @@reaper6531 read your first comment.. we are in a process to build ssn and ssbn

    • @reaper6531
      @reaper6531 2 года назад +1

      @@anooprpillai4709 njyan ayyale mention cheyyan marannatha. Thankhale udheshichathalla. Sry. Athupole nammal already SSBN indakki. Athinte advance version aanu ippol indakunne

  • @RADICALFLOAT_95
    @RADICALFLOAT_95 9 месяцев назад +2

    This video is actually genuinely underated and damm and this is actually the actual real China that the actual American and British BBC propaganda mainstream media actually don't show you is actually really like and actually capable of actually doing and damm and 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🤝🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰.

  • @sajidahussain108
    @sajidahussain108 Год назад +5

    Jinnah Class isn't Turkish, but it's a Pakistani design based on the Turkish Istanbul Class or an enlarged MILGEM type.

  • @jinz948
    @jinz948 2 года назад +9

    I am absolutely loving your content thank you so much

  • @asiftalpur3758
    @asiftalpur3758 2 года назад +5

    Can you do videos on arleigh Burke and Ticonderoga class? I think they'll be a nice point of reference to bring context to Chinese and other pacific players surface warships into context. Although you did one on Burke but a standalone video would be nice

  • @basharatmalik6840
    @basharatmalik6840 3 года назад +16

    Excellent information coming from a neutral source. Would appreciate to know from the Anchor person, whether the on-going modernization , including delivery of 8 Chinese submarines in 2- 3 years time would enable Pakistan Navy to not only defend but give a reasonable offensive capability?

    • @EurasiaNaval
      @EurasiaNaval  3 года назад +7

      The Indian Navy is also building new ships, and building quite a lot of it too. They also seem to have gotten more efficient at building them over the last decade or so. So the IN will still be twice as large. Moreover, only 4 Hangor class subs are expected to be delivered by 2023, the other 4 to be built in Karachi will take a bit longer. With subs, there is always the possibility to take the fight to the other side, especially with their air independent propulsion. However, it is more a hit and run, rather than an offensive. Just my opinion.

    • @basharatmalik6840
      @basharatmalik6840 3 года назад +2

      @@EurasiaNaval Thanks a lot for the prompt & comprehensive response. Eurasia surely is more professionally managed than other Defencec video channels ,which do not bother to respond to viewers comments. May I suggest that Eurasia may also like to share their professional views in the coming weeks as to the current capability of Indian Navy to blockade Karachi & Ormara naval bases in the event of a war and options & capability of Pak Navy to respond to such a situation. Thanks in advance

    • @EurasiaNaval
      @EurasiaNaval  3 года назад +2

      @@basharatmalik6840 Thank you sir. I imagine when, or if, I become a big channel, I might not be able to respond to every comment as I am doing now, but I'll try my best. One thing I am not intending for now is having this channel cover too many sensitive topics, because it's more about naval systems and history. There are no doubt other channels more knowledgeable about the geopolitical situation in the Indian Ocean than I am - I am interested to learn more too!

    • @basharatmalik6840
      @basharatmalik6840 3 года назад +2

      @@EurasiaNaval Thanks. I do understand your standpoint in the matter

  • @imranhassankhan3185
    @imranhassankhan3185 3 года назад +5

    MashaAllah... thanks for the information 👍

  • @mohdraja3074
    @mohdraja3074 3 года назад +5

    Eurasia naval watch good information

  • @hughmungus2760
    @hughmungus2760 2 года назад +4

    I suspect in the coming years the much fabled Type 054B or Type 057 will be released. The current type 054As are very underpowered.

    • @qiyuxuan9437
      @qiyuxuan9437 2 года назад +3

      Not underpowerd, its only a frigate, not destroyer. China has 052D and 055 for those anti ship and fleet air defence tasks. 054A is more focused on ASW tasks now.

  • @umeshutan6959
    @umeshutan6959 3 года назад +9

    The Indian navy will have sleepless nights once all the 4 frigates is operational...

    • @arminius6506
      @arminius6506 2 года назад

      Indian Navy is much bigger and better armed

    • @mirageiii3176
      @mirageiii3176 2 года назад +1

      @@arminius6506 Though they're still too reliant on foreign systems like most of their military.

    • @arminius6506
      @arminius6506 2 года назад +3

      @@mirageiii3176 and our ships are also foreign

    • @enzhus
      @enzhus 2 года назад +4

      @@arminius6506 I heard this includes technology transfer. I hope Pakistan can build its own frigates by themselves soon just like jf-17.

    • @reaper6531
      @reaper6531 2 года назад

      @@mirageiii3176 then what about Pakistan?. Almost all are from China. Most of them have technical problems

  • @aa1944-k2r
    @aa1944-k2r Год назад +1

    have we heard anything about the 8 yuan Sub? i feel like 8 subs is A LOT for pakistan, i am not sure whether they can handle and finance them, even thailand is trying to back out from the S26T sub trade because of budget issues (which they blame it on the german engines i supposed)

  • @nongnainon3395
    @nongnainon3395 2 года назад +4

    Type 054p most Advanced navy ship for Pakistan navy with CM-401 anti ship missile targeting range is 1700kh its nightmare for Indian navy

  • @supernodream
    @supernodream 2 года назад +6

    054AP Frigate is acting "Economic Destroyer" role in PAK Navy, that's why.

  • @piarulsarkar6546
    @piarulsarkar6546 3 года назад +2

    Need for pakistan,,,,merine command( south Asia sea pakistan merine command)SASPMC,,,,4 distroyer+4corvette+4cruser-+4 freeget+4sub merine team

  • @muzammilahmad6768
    @muzammilahmad6768 2 года назад +1

    👍👍

  • @thewildthings3988
    @thewildthings3988 2 месяца назад

    Hmm compared to India's shivalik class frigate, can not be compared to Nilgiri class

  • @edwardtang1977
    @edwardtang1977 3 года назад +6

    You know why US and Chinese use subsonic missiles? Subsonic missiles are more stealthy. This is why the B-2 bomber is subsonic. No, China's boat is superior. You are judging based on paper. There is a lot more than that than just these. The 054A is proven it can counter larger Chinese warship, and American Arleigh Burke has encountered 054A many times. Future warfare is system to system warfare. China's system is way superior. Pakustan uses Chinese systems. There is no way Pakistan's warship is superior to its own uncle.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 2 года назад +1

      Chinese subsonic antiship missiles are a generation ahead of what the US has in service at least until the ship based LRASM becomes operational. (which will take some time since the missiles are too big to fit inside existing american VLS cells)
      Older chinese antiship missiles like the YJ83 and YJ62 are roughly analogous to american Harpoon and Naval tomahawks. More modern YJ18s use a second supersonic terminal stage making it much harder to stop than any american anti ship missile.

    • @dabo5078
      @dabo5078 2 года назад

      @@hughmungus2760 Ther is also the CJ-10 which is a stealth anti-ship missile that is analog to the LRASM.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 2 года назад

      @@dabo5078 as far as Im aware the CJ10 isn't stealth its the chinese analogue of the tomahawk.

    • @dabo5078
      @dabo5078 2 года назад

      @@hughmungus2760 Search CJ-10 A

  • @MAR-lt7xo
    @MAR-lt7xo Год назад +1

    Appreciate that you have raised this issue. But this has been happening for last 75 years

  • @eslima70
    @eslima70 2 года назад

    Power ship.

  • @MAR-lt7xo
    @MAR-lt7xo Год назад

    Major Sb. principally you are right about corporate farming which must be stopped through the legal process in Pakistan.
    The situation in India was a bit different and Modi Govt on the behest of global Jewish commodity traders like Glencore, Kargil, etc. passed a law eliminating the minimum support price of some basic agricultural commodities like wheat, rice, sugar cane, etc. which is the lifeline of Indian Agricultural Economy and farmer community.
    Modi govt tried to pass on the maximum benefit of the agricultural economy to the globalJewish backed big commodity trades headquartered in Europe, and Switzerland through this new law, and farmers rightly agitated against this new law massively in all major states of India particularly Punjab, Haryana, etc.
    I am sure and hope that after getting out of this corrupt system, of which you were a part for many years, after looking into the picture from a very different angle as an outsider you must have realized that things are not so simple and straightforward as we see them from inside. When we are part of the system, we are one of the beneficiaries of that system.
    No one is perfect and we all have many shortcomings!

  • @dadidadida123
    @dadidadida123 2 года назад +5

    Pakistan could build a navy around 1 Type 075 amphibious assault ship which is cheaper than a carrier but could do similar jobs. Then 2 052D destroyer + 8 054A frigate.

    • @hassanahmed4954
      @hassanahmed4954 2 года назад +2

      That would be gold😶‍🌫️😶‍🌫️

    • @asiftalpur3758
      @asiftalpur3758 2 года назад +4

      We don't need an amphibious assault ship. We need type 052D, type 055 from China. Our naval doctrine is rather humble and mainly defensive, although some "aggression" may be mandated under the BRI concept, which I'm absolutely fine with. 🇵🇰 🤝 🇨🇳

    • @hassanahmed4954
      @hassanahmed4954 2 года назад

      @@asiftalpur3758 we know but still if not a aircraft carrier than maybe at least 075.. like even thailand got a aircraft carrier!!!

    • @asiftalpur3758
      @asiftalpur3758 2 года назад +3

      @@hassanahmed4954 we don't need it, nor do we need J20 and a whole host of other cool things that we think we need just because they look cool. Read our doctrines first man, we only "respond" and "fill" strategic gaps to ensure regional security. Our policy of Full Spectrum Deterrence will determine what we do or do not need.

    • @hassanahmed4954
      @hassanahmed4954 2 года назад

      @@asiftalpur3758 okay boomer😩 btw J20 is overrated, I want the PAF to buy the J35/J31 which is much cooler in my opinion.