Plane Hits Dramatic Windshear
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 июн 2023
- Enjoy this episode of 3 Minutes of Aviation!
✈ SOURCES / FURTHER INFORMATION
Pegasus Airbus A321neo windshear landing
• 2 Scary Landings in th...
Delta Boeing 737 lightning strike
• Delta Airlines Boeing ...
787 Dreamliner parallel takeoff in Madrid
• Despegue paralelo en M...
Parallel landing in San Francisco
• United Airlines B777-2...
United Boeing 777 rejected takeoff
• Rejected Takeoff (RTO)...
✈ BECOME PART OF THE CHANNEL
Merch Store - teespring.com/stores/3-minute...
✈ CONTACT ME
Submit videos, give feedback, ask questions - 3minutesofaviation@gmail.com
If you liked the video, please subscribe and turn on notifications - I appreciate it! 
Наука
Many many times I see pilots doing a go around and think "oh he could have landed"
This time I was thinking "go around, please go around" but yeah... Glad they landed safely anyway
When you are a pilot, there is no place to think when you are landing. Either you are stabilized and you land, either you MUST go around. Here it's a big failure, and as an airbus pilot, I'm shocked to see this kind of low skilled and dangerous pilot in an commercial airline.
go around is scary
simple 10 sec go around , makes your head crazy busy ,
@@jackalony9254the way I see it, every landing is a go-around with the option to land
The pilots, especially the captain is an expert, they know exactly when you carry on landing, or to do a go around.
They are highly trained professionals.
That landing was intense
That, my friend, is an ice cold pilot. Recovered, fighting more shear, and greased the landing. They earned their badass card.
@@thomasgeorge4384 I don't think 'greased' is the right word for that bouncy landing.
@Tom compared to nose first into the threshold, or bounced off the ground by windshear, I would call it a win.
Nah, it was in a plane
Thanks for that
That plane did not suffer a lightning strike.
Yeah, I watched the replay at 0.25 speed and there's no strike just a bolt in the sky beyond the aircraft.
Making up drama for internet when nothing happens lmao
Looked at it again too. That was off in the distance.
1:00 ...on the other hand, what are those white lines on the winglet? Could that be static discharges (St. Elmo's fire)?
@@andrekoscianskiyes I noticed that. There was definitely a charge on the wing tip.
Those dual takeoff and landings are so cool.
Parrallel Takeoff/Landing*
*We used to do them all the time when I was a plane-driver. Except in those days, plane-stations tended to only have a single driveway. We'd vie for position like teenage drag racers, hoping the other driver would chicken-out first! There were some very tense moments, but hardly any fatalities.*
@@MrAvGeekMan *Parallel
*If you're going to be a pedantic ársehole, at least learn to spell*
@@Willam_JI think they were having a smooth landing competition lol
They were definitely having a smooth landing competition
Flew into Salt Lake a few weeks ago. Turbulence was insane. Those mountains and the subsequent airflow that comes over them directly in the approach path are no joke!
Nearly always an adventure, both at SLC and DEN!
If they’re kinda used to getting beaten up right there, I can get why they would be less likely to do a go around
1:56 LOL, I love how the camera guy wasn't prepared for bumpy landing because he thought that CRJ and his own plane would touch down at the same time... 😂
@Pegasus: A bad landing following a completely unstabilized approach- I will never fly with you!
There was just one option: Go around!
I mean its pegasus, ultra low carrier, one that not even RYR can compete with prices
Shut up!!
You remember Pegasus had 4 crash landings in 2 years between 2018 and 2020? That's a huge number.
The plane-driver landed that bird without a single fatality. I'll take low fares over a "better-safe-than-sorry-attitude" any day of the week.
Bad landing? How did you come to that conclusion? Obviously encountered a bit of windshear but deemed it safe to continue. FYI, reactive windshear alerts are inhibited below 50 ft (bet you didn’t know that did you), which was probably the case here so I doubt the pilot was even warned about it. Thus they were quite happy to continue and land safely. A spilt second decision that wasn’t catastrophic.
Are we all just gonna ignore the buttery smooth United CRJ landing at 2:02? That was on par with an Airbus A330.
Yeah he greased it, unlike the person flying the one the person filming was on, lol.
... and he greased it well past the touch down zone...Just saying.
It's not the airplane...it's the pilot.... I'm a pilot.
That 777 engine roar! *insert Tim Taylor grunt here*
Wow that Pegasus landing was superb!
It wasn’t.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 it was superb to watch
@@flyingmyles ah ok. 👍👍. It was entertaining to watch for sure. 🤣
@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 haha yes not a good video for the company I'm sure 😅 😄
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 we can call its a good landing due that unexpected windshield, they handled well
I wish more compilation channels were as well-made as yours. Always brilliant.
That crj made a nice landing but the recorders plane was a firm one😂😂
I was looking for this comment! Like dang that was a rough landing.
@@BlackWidow00741 looked ouchy
@@kwasisb5390 Haha. 😂😂
In the first clip, they really should have gone arround!
2 pilots 1 comment 😮
@@GarageSupra it wasn’t wind shear. This was pilot input.
Shut up !!
ikr
Reactive windshear alerts are inhibited below 50 ft.
The best aviation channel on YT ... PERIOD.
For short clips, agreed. Otherwise it’s gotta be Mentour Pilot 👍
It’s not a big deal for a pilot, but for us fearful passengers… “Sorry guys, we had a roller coaster ride!”
"It’s not a big deal for a pilot, but for us fearful passengers…"
Wind shear on final is a very big deal to any pilot, but they're not going to say that to YOU of course.
Windshear could crash a plane depending on if it is a short final
This channel is remarkably consistent - the wind shear and parallel approaches was stunning - but today I found the lightning and United 777 segments rather anticlimactic as I don't think I saw much in the video of what was described in their captions...
That was the best three-minute vid yet! Awesome!😁
Nice video... Enjoyed watching...
Great video!
Incredible footage
Chill dude, honestly.
Love this chanel
This one was excellent!
Excellent footage.
Great flying!
I really enjoy these videoes
1:31 "This passenger captures a United Express CRJ-200 performing an approach onto a parallel runway"
wau!
いつも楽しく拝見させてもらってます！本当にありがとうございます😊
Man that was a go around,those pilots heard about that I guarantee.
Shut up!!
Probably not
"You whine like a mule. You are still alive." Morgan Freeman, Robin Hood
This time we owe you two seconds of aviation.
Experienced a landing like this in Florida during a storm several years ago. Was a bumpy ride for sure!
Good video ❤
Having great pilots makes all the difference!
That A321 was intense
That first pilot was like, nope we’re still landing
1:13 from the sound of the stabiliser and zoom I would say he's using a Panasonic DC-FZ82.
That Bloke @ 0.28 with his apologizing for getting frightened and excited at that Windshear....can you imagine the passengers reactions! Kudos to the Pilot for The Save! Got to love those Parallel Take Offs and Landings when we are lucky to see them! Great job as always 3MOA for the awesome video! Cheers To all From The Clouds In Ohio!
Kudos to the pilots? LOL. That wasn’t wind shear.
feeling sudden weightlessness on final approach is never a good sign lmao
Tried that side by side landing in a 744 next to an MD-11 in SFO once, just a little too tight the MD-11 was sent around.
nice
There musta been a ton of runway left. The way they floated down the runway I figured that's. go-around for sure. Great job by the pilots.
I'm amazed they landed it, they are usually late. Worst airline I've flew on.
Yeah, that first one ruined my entire day
🤣🤣🤣
Saludos desde Zapopan México
Personally i would have gone around for the first clip cause that was a close call
Nice airplane drag-racing
The first time I ever heard the term, "windshear", was when Pan Am 759 crashed into our neighborhood a few blocks from my house in 1982.
When I was young I had absolutely no fear of flying but now as an adult I gained a fear of flying simply based off the "mood" of the maintenance personnel and how lazy they were the day I take my flight lol
0:20 - Them some bad-ass pilots! Didn't even need to go around despite a shear that might cower lesser nerves.
There was no shear. This was pilot input. Nothing bad-ass about it.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 Read the title of this upload. So what do you think shoved the nose down at 0:21?
@@Zickcermacity title means nothing. This RUclipsr puts nice aviation videos together, but he isn’t really an aviation expert.
The nose was pushed down by the flight crew. A windshear doesn’t change the pitch of an airplane. It would drop the airplane but the deck angle would remain the same.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 I'll take them at their word. I'm not one of those paranoid conspiracy types that think that everything is made up.
@@Zickcermacity conspiracy? There is no conspiracy. Weird thing to say.
This RUclipsr is great, but that doesn’t mean he gets everything correct. The RUclipsr is not in aviation. He is a fan of it.
The 737-9 didn't suffer a lightning strike, as you can see the reflection of it 'as a mirror' on the wing. It was pretry far away because this is a big one. If that hits you, you would have only seen a short brief burst of white light in your camera because the need of adjusting.
And at the end of the wing there are lightning deflectors, so if it was hit you should see the lightning have interference but you see nothing changed directions because of the plane just lightning somewhere in the sky.
wow, this windshear is impressive ! The passengers probably had their guts going up in their mouth !
Gotta love sfo
When the Delta 737-900 got struck by lightning, was that in Utah?
These channels only motive is that someday a big crash will be caught on their lens and the bloke commenting will like his "Hinderburg" moment. Bless.
Ryanair pilot: the landing is much cool then mr
What is the siphon-like mini-tornado in front of the engine at 2:20 ? Is that common ?
1:22 Saudia is having a hard time “getting it Up”😂
~3000 ft. difference in where the runway thresholds start.
Was that first airline flypigs?
1:51 The parallel landing here, I want to say it was at San Francisco International (SFO) I’ve completed many simulation landings there 😅
If you have that much anxiety you should not be watching planes at an airport.
I saw lighting hit the wing in a 737 after we'd descended through some pretty good bumps. Because the pilot warned us about the turbulence & I knew lighting doesn't usually damage planes, I wasn't pretty calm. For once.
yeah who wants to be calm all the time?
That RJ sure did extend their landing. Probably avoiding the wake turbulence from the other plane.
They never get cleared that closely behind another heavy.
I'm not sure that was windshear. With windshear the attitue of the plane wouldn't change the wind would be just pushing the whole plane down. To get the nose to push down like that would require some pilot input. I'm thinking it was just wind.
0:47 they didnt go around LOL
Was it a windshear or a microburst?
-If that was windshear, the pilots would have been required to execute a wind shear escape maneuver and subsequent go-around.
-A lightning strike is when the lightning hits the aircraft, not when there is lightning nearby.
-If you put accurate titles and captions on your video, they wouldn't get reported for misleading titles and spam.
Flying is still very scary, bobbing around uncontrollably during windshear is unpredictable at best, until things like that can never happen, flying is still risky.
If a POSITIVE landing is required, do it. The passengers will get over it easier than the alternative.
0:21 two fresh pants for the cockpit please. :D
JOE MY god!
That first video is not necessarily an indication of wind shear...you can't tell just by watching this video, for all we know it was the pilots method to drop in elevation which I have seen hundreds of times. the drop was quick but appeared controlled and intentional to me. it was not very steep, it was mostly level from what I could see, though could have been a response to crosswind
Could be, pegasus airlines is like Turkish ryan air
oi mate, bit a windshear innit
On a professionnal point of view, the Pegasus 321 did not recovered nothing, he should just have gone around.
You should not make assertions unless you have all the information required to make that decision. Sure, watching it from the couch, it's easy to say he should have gone around. But it's also possible that the pilot had a hot date that evening and didn't want to risk being late. ;-)
@@ptrinch That's funny, kid.
@@ptrinch Approach became unstable, go around.
Who the hell was recording those 787 taking off?? Darth Vader???
Surprising that the first plane did not go around; it was certainly warranted.
We need 6 minutes of aviation!
You can always watch it twice hahaha
Pegasus landing…wild ride but safely down.
scary - still looks like he could/should have gone around on the first dip
Woaw, super shock by this crew who landed despite of massive windshear and multiple non stabilization critera. They should have go around 3 times here, it's extremely dangerous. Theyfailed to apply airbus windshear/toga procedure, it's a huge mistake, and I think they will have a serious discussion with their airline when they will see the curves and data of this landing. Still can't believe they did continue this landing
1:05 "This planespotter captures two Boeing 787 Dreamliners performing a parallel takeoff"
So?
0:21 rrrrrheeee ohhhhh ro ro ro ro ho ho ho ho
One of the pilots didn't know it was supposed to be simultaneous and departed before the other.
Bro did that plane stall or what
It's not a 737-900ER, it's a 737 Max 9 ER
flypgs... Fly Pegasus is not what comes in my mind at first. However good job, worthy called a Pegasus.
So could that windshear happen almost on ground? I'm pretty concerned right now😬
Wind shear close to landing is potentially dangerous but not unusual. It's much better understood today than 30-40 years ago and the pilots and aircraft are both better equipped for it.
The last one: i know the pilots are well trained but why risk it?
0:44 "...suffers a lightning strike"
How did the plane SUFFER? That lightning didn't even hit the wing 1:02 but somewhere far from the wing...
Why does the Madrid clip sound like Darth Vader?
There was no lightning strike there, at least not during the video sequence. The lightning seen happens in the background, it doesn't hit the plane. And when lightning hits the plane there is a strong bang (I know first hand unfortunately), that is nowhere to be heard in this video.
❤ LOVE this channel ❤ 👍
suggestion: can you please leave the preceding description there for the video for a bit? like at the border of the screen or transparently somewhere. i often have to skip back to it because i wasn't fast enough with reading.
subtitles, instead of cards please
You can always pause the video too
@@benschreffler7296 im not always able to. I sometimes watch 3MOA during dish washing. With hands covered in dishwasher and water, it's a bit inconvenient
Wouldn't it be really dramatic if that windshear happened closer to ground?
any pilots here about first landing should he TOGA?
Jeez, calm down.
Non-pilots will think this is something really bad or special or what ever. A group of real pilots watching this will exchange knowing glances at each other and think "whats all the fuss about, it's just a bit of low level turbulence that was handled well by the operating crew". Sorry folks, nothing special about this approach, just another day in the office, sure a little bit of a challange but that's what we get paid for.
I wonder how people onboard felt like. (Can someone tell me if that was correct english)
1:57 💀
looks like ryanair got 777s
So many of these clips are from airlines that luckily, I will never fly on😅
Haha, me too! I'm on an International No-Fly List due to an incident involving my emotional-support companion on an Emirates A380.
In my defence, I repeatedly told the cabin crew to stop serving him alcohol. A píssed-up Clydesdale at 38,000 feet is no joke.
the second plane didn#t suffer any lightning strike, it was way behind the airplane. If it was IN the plane, it would have discharged at the static dischargers and winglets.
They were glowing afterwards. Definitely some static there.
Why on earth would you NOT go around??