A big byrna advocate, RAT defense channel, tested the new byrna SD with a xradar chronograph, yet he tested the pistelle x68 with a chronograph that has antennas, because he knows it gives lower joule readings. He wanted to not make the pistelle x68 look good with high joule readings,thus he chose the antenna chronograph. But now, he goes back to using xradar for the new byrna SD(because it gives higher joule readings at the muzzle) despite the fact he argued with me why the xradar is an invalid device to use. Hilarious. Im posting this here for everyone to read. No one is falling for your completely BIASED approach, RAT Defense. He basically uses the xradar for byrna and gavle because the xradar gives the highest joule readings, and he's biased to those launchers But then with the pistelle x68, he choses not to use xradar and instead use a chronograph that uses antennas and will give lower readings. This is the smoke and mirrors that RAT Defense uses to make byrna look good and other launchers look bad
A big byrna advocate, RAT defense channel, tested the new byrna SD with a xradar chronograph, yet he tested the pistelle x68 with a chronograph that has antennas, because he knows it gives lower joule readings. He wanted to not make the pistelle x68 look good with high joule readings,thus he chose the antenna chronograph. But now, he goes back to using xradar for the new byrna SD(because it gives higher joule readings at the muzzle) despite the fact he argued with me why the xradar is an invalid device to use. Hilarious. Im posting this here for everyone to read. No one is falling for your completely BIASED approach, RAT Defense.
He basically uses the xradar for byrna and gavle because the xradar gives the highest joule readings, and he's biased to those launchers
But then with the pistelle x68, he choses not to use xradar and instead use a chronograph that uses antennas and will give lower readings. This is the smoke and mirrors that RAT Defense uses to make byrna look good and other launchers look bad
@@joesolo7719 It’s not that deep.