Rather than "awkward", I would say Tyra Banks looks "bigger" than her clothes in theatrical romantic lines. I don't mean "bigger" as in size, but in a figurative, "feeling" sort of way. She feels more grandiose than the clothes. I imagine her bursting through a door very dramatically. You've gotten me into this awful habit of attempting to type everyone I see. Friends, relatives; passers-by. I watched an old Laurel and Hardy film and even found myself analyzing their features!
@@merriamstyle I hope you don’t mind, as it has been quite some time, but I have one disagreement with your analysis of Tyra Banks-that being her nose. In the photographs shown here, it does indeed appear quite sharp and a bit prominent, but I think she must contour it. In photographs wherein she isn’t wearing make-up, her nose actually appears much softer and not as narrow. I imagine you’ve looked at more pictures than I have, so I would be interested to know your reasoning.
You get more insightful every video! I really appreciate you comparing different and similar cheekbones, jawlines, etc. on the different bodies, and consistently suggesting gamine as an option for people having trouble not fitting squarely in any of the other types. Very helpful. Loving all the TR videos lately, although it has just served to confirm that I am not TR 😂 I would also suggest that for people not at their ideal weight and going back and forth between SD and TR that they also consider Flamboyant Gamine (not just Soft Gamine), since yin flesh can be harder to nail down for us! More on Flamboyant Gamines! xox
This I think is the basic difference between my mother and I. We're discussing this exact point these days so your video couldn't have been timelier for us! Love your work!
Yes! 14:28 This is a Soft Dramatic wearing "romantic lines". Wouldn't this be the perfect dress for a Soft Natural? I am soft natural, and I think this would look good on me! 🙂
I wonder if you could also compare the classic types, perhaps with some not by the book examples (like Jada Pinkett being 5'0'' and DC, but not necessarily in regards to height). Also would love you to discuss classic classics, are they such rare of a type or is there more diversity to them than we think? Thanks!
I've been confused for so long... so I just put my pictures next to them, so I look like a teenager next to Sophia kkk And I look so much like Rihanna and Mila! Thank You for this video
Thank you for this vid! I’m a Soft Dramatic and I really struggle with feeling sexy, and I definitely don’t identify with the sexy style. But I do love feeling elegant :)
Now that you say that, I feel like I should use a more 'objective' word rather than delicate! Have you considered soft classic? If the ornate things are too much for you, you could be soft classic. Is there a reason why you've discounted it?
@@merriamstyle wow, thank you for your quick answer! I have watched the SC video in the meantime to remember... I have been doubting in the beginning especially whether I could be SC. Mostly because of my "vibe" (which i thought matches both naomi watts and marion cotillard) . But i believe my body is too unbalanced (wide hour glass /pear shape when thinner) I had some C answers in the test too, they were all on face. So perhaps that influences the necessity for minimalistic jewelry etc?
Haha oops. I just saw your comment on another post about people matching themselves to a celebrity based on their vibe... After posting my reply. :') Guilty... But fortunately i have learned more by now!
To me there really isn't much confusion of overlap between SD and TR, I was much much confused, based of description, between SN and TR. When I took the test it was easier and more clear to me and I was obviously a TR.
@@Adaphobic ikr i have that problem too. and the hair is the hardest part for me , casually i do look a bit messy never perfect it's hard but i like being a soft classic any way .
I took this test several times. I have no idea what I am so I will contact you I have a thin waist and am shapely but short and not very big on top. I’m not straight like a boy but I doubt I’m a gamine and look a bit like a soft classic but I’m too short. When I was younger I looked more like Meryl Streep so I thought I was a soft classic.
Mila Kunis is a soft gemine in my eyes. she does have some elements of TR. but her waist and feet are not TR. And somehow I think even her face is a bit...more like SD. What do you think, Merriam?
With her flesh+facial features (and any TR flesh or facial features), you can be either TR or SG. The difference between SG and TR is really in the bones, and Mila doesn't have a mixed skeleton that is slightly yang dominant. But her skeleton is more yin dominant. Then you could say 'well maybe FG because FG has yin skeleton', but her flesh is too soft (FG has yin flesh and features), so, she's TR. I'd say no way she's SG because she doesn't have a mixed and yang-dominant skeleton. I mention all of this in my SG vs TR vid on my website: merriamstyle.com/sg_tr.html
Could it be dramatic classic or so, probably not, because her features are not mixed evenly? I give up😁 I don't know, somehow I just can'tssee her as TR. but as you said, I will try to see her in different styles and certainly I will see that she looks best in TR. Kibbe's body typing is amazing. Now umi understand why some things never suit me etc. all makes perfect sense now ❤️❤️ Thank you for contributing & explaining so much. I hope kibbe watches your videos😊❤️
Just one thing. I have no idea what I am talking about. I can only identify SD and TR. And maybe SG sometimes. But it's more a guess. So sorry for wasting your time, Merriam. I am new to this all😊😊❤️
awwwww!! Don't worry about it, it's not a waste of time, I'm sure so many people have thought that and now they can read in the comments section about it even if they're one of the 'silent viewers'!!
You know what... Look who other TRs are... Let us say, - Nicole Scherzinger (or even Kim Kardashian, though Aly Art typed her as soft natural, I don't quite agree. TR shows her better)... It is supposed, that they all can, pretty, much rock, slay the same clothes, accessories... Though Mila's makeup maybe is more Gamine, in her case. She wears heavy smokey eye... And it's not the best choice for many TR ideally - as far as I know (I can relate). (too much blending, grunge, when they need more precise lines) But Mila looks good with it, iconic. - An exception in her case
Great video as always . Could you do a video to better understand how the different body parts look like. I have trouble to say whats a sharp shoulder is or a sharp cheekbone. Keira knightley has in my opinion a more dainty cheekbone because its less prominent than penelope cruz for instance.
I find you only describe SDs with negative connotations/words overpowering, broad, so large, awkward, "less dainty", and romantics, gamines, TRs as petite, cute, dainty, small. Not a fan of that
This is definitely worth talking about. Those words are subjective, and while some people may be offended by 'large' and 'less dainty', other people may be equally offended by 'small,' 'dainty', and especially 'cute'. A lot of gamines and romantics tell me that they feel they aren't taken seriously because of these characteristics. Especially when I mentioned that a romantic may look like she's wearing her boyfriend's blazer instead of her own--this may be quite 'offensive' to some. So I hope we can remember that positive and negative here can be very subjective. I also never would or should use the word 'broad' to describe soft dramatics because this isn't accurate (it's the natural bone structure that's broad), so if I did, that was in error (although I don't think I did?). Dramatics and Naturals simply are less dainty and small than romantics, and they're also less petite. This isn't inherently positive or negative, and I hope we can all move away from seeing it that way. I also never used the word 'overpowering' to describe dramatics or naturals. Rather, I say that romantics are easily overpowered by larger lines and shapes, while dramatics aren't. But even if I did, why would overpowering be such a bad thing? Finally, in my Lily Cole video, I even say that she may be wondering why she looks so awkward all the time (she's a soft gamine), so I do use 'awkward' to describe gamines as well, because they really can look awkward in lines that aren't their own (I think we all do to some extent, but gamines I've noticed especially). On the other hand, romantics and classics can look overpowered or frumpy sometimes in lines that aren't their own (which I also mention in my videos), but they don't seem to look awkward as often from what I've seen. I really believe that for every dramatic who wants to look shorter, there's a romantic who wants to look taller. The grass is always greener, but I hope that through learning about kibbe body typing, we can see the unique beauty in each type, and work with our bodies' lines instead of against them!!
@@merriamstyle I agree. I'm a soft dramatic, and I've always liked my body type. I wish my facial features had more yin, but it is what it is. I admire looks on every part of the yin-yang spectrum.
This is so helpful! Soft dramatic vs. theatrical romantic is my exact dilemma. Thank you for talking about some of the lesser talked about Kibbe types :)
Please a video about naturals and how we can achieve different looks (sexy, cute, feminine). I know you have one on soft naturals but can you make one on "pure" naturals? Pleease 🙏
To me Rihanna has always seem mistyped in the TR category because the average tallest height in TR is 5’6” and Rihanna is 5’8” plus she seems to have a more balanced and classic face compared to like Rachel McAdams and also bigger boned structurally than other TRs. Just wondered what your thoughts were, or if there’s an explanation for the inconsistencies?
Rihanna is a SD; Rachel McAdams is a SN. Merriam classified these celebreties not according to Kibbe's system but her own (without knowing it yet) using Kibbe's vocabulary.
Rihanna is a Soft Dramatic with flamboyant gamine influence though. If you look at her old pictures you can see that she has a very straight body and not that curvy.
Thanks. This is very helpful! I’m a soft dramatic who sometimes feels influenced to wear very romantic clothing at the influence of my friends! I always feel like some awkward, lanky giant but I feel right comfy and at home in severe lines. I get so much style advice but it gets lost in translation. Thanks for helping me understand why. The only feminine bones I have are small hands and feet! I also always wondered why my arms are as long as a monkey’s. This explains it! *whew* Lol i would love to see a side by side comparison like this for all dramatic types!
It would be really nice if you´d want to make a video about flamboyant naturals, it would be really helpful to learn more about different styles/impressions that are possible using their lines :) 'Cause I feel quite limited honestly Also! It´s nice to see that you pst so often, your videos are always so in depth, they´re fantastic
Merriam Style I sort of feel like it’s hard to look more classy/elegant as flamboyant natural lines sometimes feel like just baggy clothes to me. Also having a more feminine or cute vibe, that feels almost impossible as a flamboyant natural Thank you for answering!
I completely agree! If I were a celebrity and had a life style that allowed me to have crazy, wild hair and big, elaborate clothing, I would find it easier, but to make it work in a regular job takes more effort, I think.
Your knowledge is really admirable! Through your videos I finally determined I'm TR. Eye opening! I hope to start dressing for my body type as soon as possible. But it's quite difficult to find clothes for TR in mainstream stores.
Yay that's awesome! Have you watched my casual looks for R and TR? I'd say it'd be good to watch both. In casual looks for R, I mention how there are lots of ways to add yin aside from lace and frills. R does not always mean ultra frilly, you can do other things like gathers, fittedness, lightweight fabrics, waist emphasis, etc. But anyway, hope you check those out if you haven't already!
@@merriamstyle Thanks for the reference! I'll check those videos! I've started to explore body types recently. I hope to order your style analysis some time this year because there are still so many questions plus I want to figure out my skin undertone. Now I understand why some clothes fit perfectly and some just look awful. Thanks for your work and effort!
Hi Merriam! I would love to know what you think of this: Bigbang is my favorite South Korean band and I think they're very unique! All five of them have different body types. (As per my observation) G-dragon: Flamboyant Gamine Top: Soft Dramatic Taeyang: Romantic Daesung: Natural Seungri: Soft Classic And GD is THE fashion icon! You're a gamine too so maybe you'll like his style!
@@PattyFru Yes! 😃 I tried to type them like this as GD literally never gets over-powered by any outfits and it made me curious of his body type. Kibbe works for everybody! Lol I wanted to discuss this with someone but no-ones into it like me.
@@poojaasharma To be honest I am terrible in typing men :D I agree with G-dragon, mostly because like you said, he can pull ANY outfit (any in this case means combined, contrasted), more "crazy" the better. Not sure about Taeyang - TR or R, but definitely romantic family
Yes! GD is definitely FG, I admire how he can rock eccentric style so well. Another SK boy group that I could type as well is BTS: Jin: Soft Dramatic Namjoon/RM: Flamboyant Natural Yoongi/Suga: Gamine Hoseok: Flamboyant Gamine Jimin: Soft Gamine Taehyung: Classic Jungkook: Soft Natural
Both of those videos are great ! You really explain clearly the bone structure which I find more difficult to see. I would be very interested in a video on Flamboyant Gamine both in body type and in clothing lines.
Could you create a similar video for Soft Classic vs Theatrical Romantic? I know I'm definitely not SD or SG, but I keep going back and forth between SC and TR.
@MerriamStyle , I think I've finally found my body type! (maybe I'm still wrong hehe). The first time I did the test, I undoubtedly identified me with the Soft Natural type. I admit that I wasn't objective, I've always had a weakness for the Boho style and I have used the natural-free style without questioning whether it suited me or not. Nevertheless, I began to doubt if my body would be a Soft Dramatic. I have Hands & Feets A, Arms & Legs A, Cheekbones A and a height of 5ft 7in (172cm). But the rest of my characteristics are D/E and I don't think I am so voluptuous and big as a Soft Dramatic... So, maybe a Theatrical Romantic? What has confused me the most has always been my height. Although I look like shorter and I've got a lot of Yin influence, when I take me photos with other people many times I'm taller than theirs, so that has made me think sometimes that I don't look delicate enough as a Theatrical Romantic. However, as you have shown us there are Romantic celebrities like Rihanna, Charlize Theron or Beyonce who are tall. Another thing that has made me confused is that I don't feel identified with the Theatrical Romantic style. Although I like it, I have always tended to dress myself bohemian and relaxed. So I think I can finally be a Theatrical Romantic... I just wanted to tell you about my experience, Merriam! I would like to know what you think :).Thanks for all your work, it's amazing! xx
Can theatrical romantics *be* quite tall? I‘d say I look very ying leaning apart from maybe a few blunter features but nothing about me is really *sharp*. I did the test and got theatrical romantic, which I would agree with apart from the fact that everyone says romantics can only be short... i‘m confused
Great video! The comparisons you made are very insightful (: I know you've done a lot of videos lately about TR, but I would love to see one about TR vs Romantic. As far as I've seen (and please correct me if I'm wrong), there isn't really that much of a difference in what these 2 types can wear? Also, can TR have their yin come from B answers? Thanks again for all the work you put into your videos!
Yes, I'd say the difference between R and TR is much smaller in terms of the clothes than let's say, D and SD. But generally, TR has more sharpness at the edges (I'm not sure if you watched my video on casual looks for TR but I talk about it there)!
@@merriamstyle Thanks for responding to my question! Yes I've watched that video but I might rewatch anyway. (: In your opinion, would a R look worse in TR clothes than vice versa?
I don't think either would look worse or vice versa. I think that TR would look cute in R clothing, because it'll be as a contrast to their dainty angularity, TR may look slightly more like SG in R clothing. Then, R would look more badass and overtly sexual potentially in TR clothing (sort of like the same effect when TR wears SG clothing if you watched my Rachel McAdams video)!! From yin to yang in the skeleton, we have, R, TR, SG. To look more badass, R can wear TR, TR can wear SG. To look more cute and childlike, SG can wear TR, and TR can wear R (going in the other direction). That's my little 'theory'!! R can also wear SG to look pretty badass as I showed in that Rachel McAdams video!
@@merriamstyle Oooh I love that theory. My favourite part of your videos is how you use the info about Kibbe types and apply it in real life/find patterns within the rules. Great work as usual - thank you so much! (:
How is Lily Cole a soft gamine? She's taller with very long legs in proportion to her body, a smaller head and a long vertical line? I mean look at her in pics with other SGs... She's so big
I mean basically on the system we would have the same body type. Which is ridiculous if you would look at the two of us side by side. I can't think that what would be flattering on her would be the same for me.
Soft gamines aren't always short with short legs, this is just a stereotype! I did an entire video on Lily Cole that you could check out if you're interested!
Merriam, you explain this so well, I have two questions for you :) First: what's your thought on women who have a slight yang undercurrent in the facial features, not in the bone structure, but where the rest of the test answers are D and E? My sister has all D and E answers in her skeletal bones (body and face) and body flesh, but her eyes and lips are B and A? That doesn't fit the description of her yang undercurrent coming from her bones, but she's still primarily yin with a slight yang undercurrent and looks amazing in TR clothing. Would she still be considered TR? Second: I also wonder about women who have wide and round bones like romantics, but with a slight yang undercurrent in the facial bones (all flesh = yin). I find that most examples of theatrical romantics are of women who are not as wide as romantics, more delicately feminine. But if you have E answers in flesh and bones (body), and therefore have a body who looks romantic, but with some sharpness in the facial bones, you'd still be theatrical romantic...? Thank you for all the work you put in, you're a great inspiration!
Is it accurate to say that theatrical romantics will feel that typically yang clothes will make them look/feel 'masculine'? If I wear yang lines I feel like I look awful and my instant thought is 'it makes me look masculine'. Since doing the kibbe quiz and spending a lot of time better understanding the system, I'm certain I'm theatrical romantic. So then I got thinking - is the reason typically yang clothes make me feel like I look 'too masculine' because I'm so yin dominant that it completely clashes and overpowers rather than compliments?
TF I feel the same happens to me. Thanks for pointing that out. I feel so unattractive when I wear yang only lines and as soon as I add some delicate yin like a thin yet ornate necklace or a ruffled neckline I feel so much more satisfied with how I look.
I couldn't definite if I were theatrical romantic or soft gamine or soft dramatic while my face is more Sophia Loren, but my body is more romantic more soft. BUT my height is pure Gamine. Thanks to this video I know that Im Soft Dramatic. Little Soft Dramatic 😊
I think I am Theatrical Romantic but I also have curves on top and bottom. Always have even when I dropped to a size four. Could you do a video on the differences between romantic and class? Because someone told me I was soft classic where other people tell me I am Theatrical Romantic.
Yes I’m a soft natural who used to dress almost exclusively in and is attracted to theatrical romantic styles - help!!! I’m intrigued by the goddess lines of SN that I could explore please, and how not to appear larger in TR lines (ie accommodating my SN lines). LOVE your videos as ever, thank you so much!!! 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻❤️❤️❤️
I think Soft Gamines often have this doll cuteness("няшность" по-русски очень слэнговым, жаргонным выражением:)... Like Ethereal:) Or like complicated face bone structure - like Kourtney Kardashian, Sazan Hendrix, Teni Panosyan, rock energy in their face.. Look very deinty - teen girl or boyish, in the best way. And they pull off bright lip and eye together well, for example, smokey eyes. TR and SD - is a Woman... All different makeup - more precise lines(Real smokey eyes from Aly Art video is a very questionable choice), longer brows, shimmer finish for TR, SD, look good in glitter. Different accessories for TR , SD and SG..:) Kim and Koutney had a fitting for their VS model Halloween looks. And there is one famous pic of them, in one outfit with angular lines... It suits Kortney so much!... Matches her face with lines... - And it doesn't suit Kim... But the glitter that it has on.. It suits Kim so much, by nature!... I wrote a comment there, based on Kibbie... Interesting, hudreds of people liked it not knowing about Kibbie, haha
I think that word in russian, in quotations, would be best translated as 'delicate' in english. :) But I wouldn't say all soft gamines look doll like, I don't think Halle Berry or Hayden Panettiere (both soft gamines) look particularly doll like (this is more ingenue).
@@merriamstyle it is like "cute cute cute cute" - I'm saying in a higher voice, with a smile, that word is very Internet slang:) Full load of cuteness, in a good way:)) Stereotype that sometimes works out well..:) Someone wrote about their mom... I think my mom is a SG too, and she is not this delicate..
I think I am a Soft Dramatic. The most important thing for me is to dress for my vertical. If I don't do it, the whole outfit does not look good on me. I cannot wear a black T- shirt and white jeans, or seperates in general. Im 1,67 cm, but I have a long vertical line. A lot of people think I am taller. Even my sport clothes have to look chic. As a teatrical Romantic you can wear seperates. In general the biggest mistake a Soft Dramatic and a pure Dramatic can make, is to cut their body in two parts. As a Soft Dramatic you have to dress 80% like a pure Dramatic and 20 % you take from the Romantics. Not the other way. I see a lot of Soft Dramatics, who dress way to Romantic. To much softness is not working for a Soft Dramatic.
I feel more comfortable wearing a single line most of the time (or monochromatic maybe) but the bad thing is that I can also wear dark colors on the top and light or medium tones on the bottom and that confuses me, but I still feel more comfortable feeling a little soft dramatic even though I can wear those color cuts sometimes and I don't know what to do.
And what is the difference in the test between soft dramatic and pure gamine? They both have answers A and E but what differentiates them mainly in the distribution of responses in the bone and flesh? Thank you!
As for tall TR, like Rihanna... I'm thinking of singer Justine Skye! She is 1.80. Looked to me 1.65. She is likely a TR. Though maybe, maybe a SD - not this likely. She pulls off TR style just greatly
yes just googled her and she is a TR I think. SD lines look too heavy on her, and a V neck line doesn't suit her. And SG lines make her look more womanly/badass.
I did the test again, after someone commenting that my saying that I am very narrow but still have some softness is 'pretty much the definition of theatrical romantic' And I have figured out this: my flesh is a combination of C and D, and my bones a combination of D, C and A - which are, like, 3 answers (body & face combined, with my vertical line being B-A), and I have *kind of* returned to possible being a theatrical romantic, which can be right. A lot fo the 'good for TR' styles work quite well on me. I wouldn't know sure though as I have very little TR clothes. It's also funny, because when I first got into kibbe, my instinct was 'theatrical romantic obviously!' but then got a bit carried of because I didn't exactly fullfill stereotypes exactly. I am/look a bit taller than the average TR and I don't really have a hardcore hourglass figure. There's waist definition...A dent...But my waist is rather an answer C. I am also generally not as 'fleshy' but I am a bit underweight, and considering my weight I *should* be bonier, which I am not. The only place in my body where you can really see bones is my ridicilously thin neck and my knobbly elbows.
Can one be soft gamine with a height of 1.72? My head is big so i don't look tall, my nose, eyes and lips are also big, so i kinda look like SD, flesh is soft like Rihanna, which is TR, i guess i could be SG... Brilliant, thank you, i was so confused!
Yes, would like to see that. In my opinion, if naturals are squarish and dramatics are rectangular, flamboyant naturals, being a mix of the two would be a T shape (I know, I could have described all these types better lol but this is how I understand it)
I'm still very confused about my body type, but I finally understood what answer my jawline is. I'm making progress, I guess! 😅 Typing ourselves is so hard...
Rihanna is tall , you can't be TR if you're 5'8. You don't have to have larger bones to be soft dramatic either and you can be short and be soft dramatic with elongation. I don't find this helpful
Hey! I have recently come across a polish stylist who offers kibbe consults just like you. She also types celebrities. But i have found that her typings quite frequently do not much yours. For example Monica Bellucci is romantic, Brigitte bardot is soft natural, Rachel Weisz is theatrical romantic, Mila Kunis Megan fox as a soft natural... it kinda breaks my faith in Kibbe typing hahha. Do you have any idea why the confusion happens? And the list goes on...
Hey! I know a lot of stylists, fashion theoreticians type people differently..:) The world wasn't built on Kibble..:) Different minds, different perception, different taste even, the system is pretty complicated and there seems to be always some little approaches added to it..:) Kibble himself would mistype people not once and acknowledges it....
I am still struggling. I know my bones are yang, but unsure how much soft flesh I have. Also unsure if they're wide enough for FN.... I mean, I struggle to see the difference between Tyra Banks and Julia Roberts. Both are tall, curvy and with big eyes and lips, yet Julia is apparenly an FN... Can you please also take a look at LeeLee Sobieski, who seems pretty hard to type, and perhaps some famous girl bands where we see many types next to each other? Like The Spice Girls, Destiny's Child, All Saints, Dixie Chicks and so forth?
I'm by no means an expert, but I thought it would be interesting to compare Tyra Banks and Julia Roberts and I wanted to help. Julia's lips aren't really full; they're just quite broad. For me, they are the perfect example of a B-lip. Tyra's lips are not as wide, but they are fuller. And actually, I think this lack of broadness lends itself towards her lips being fuller. If I make dough and place it in a small pan, it will look plumper than if I took the same amount and covered a large cookie-sheet with it. This is applicable to Julia's bust as well. The eyes are a bit tricky because makeup can really change their appearance a lot. After looking and comparing photos of the two without makeup, I would say Julia's are answer A and Tyra's lean more towards E. They are a bit close together, which may cause someone to answer D, but the shape is more rounded with the absence of any makeup. Most eye-makeup seems to lift the eyes at the corners. If, by curvy, you mean to say both have prominent busts and hips and/or a defined waist, I would disagree. I would call Tyra's bust an answer E because, even as a supermodel (and presumably very thin), she had a rather large bust. Julia's bust I would call answer B. She has a chest, to be sure, but it isn't prominent when compared to the entirety of her body. I think this is probably to do with the overall width of her body-a feature of naturals, of course. Robert's hip-line is answer B and does not really appear "curved" to me. If you compare them to Banks', which are quite literally rounded in shape, it becomes very obvious. For their waists, I would say Robert's is answer B and Banks' is answer A. But, the most important question is: What is the most noticeable thing about them? I would say that, with Tyra, I notice length and lushness atop that. For Julia, broadness is the first thing I notice. Something to note about the "Curves" of a yang type: Despite a prominent bust or hip-line, the overall shape of a yang type is quite straight. Demi Lovato is a great example of this. The "defined waist" of a yang type is more angular than rounded, as with a yin type, and brings out the angularity of their bones. Audrey Hepburn is a great example of this. I hope this was helpful and please feel free to argue with me. I love to hear other people's opinions.
@@unneighborlyarcades6356 This was very insightful, thank you. Julia has admitted to putting a filler in her top lip, claiming it was much smaller than her bottom. So I can agree that her lips aren't THAT full, and that they are more wide than they are full, but they are still quite full and makes her appear rather soft. Tyras lips may be fuller because she's black? I'm not quite sure how race plays in to Kibbe, but even though her lips are full, they're not sticking out as "full for a black woman", I think? More average sized, compared to, say her rival on the runway; Naomi Campbell. But maybe that's not relevant at all, and almost all black women will have a yin answer on the lips? Tyra's bust is definately large and noticeable regardless of her overall body size, but I think Julia's bust would be a D, or maybe C, definately not a B answer as I find her boobs a little too big to fit a B answer. I think Tyra currely uses a bit of shapewear on her waist, making her appear more curved than she really is, because when I looked up pics from her modelling career, I can agree that her waist is more of an A answer. However, she has said she gains first around the middle, which could make it more of a B answer, but she appears these days to have a D answer. Julia does seem to be a clear B, even some hint of abs there. But her hips seems more of a C to me, where'as Tyra's are an E like her bust. But if I take away Julia's lips, I'm not sure broadness is the first thing I notice about her, whereas Tyra is definately a ripe hourglass with long limbs. So if Tyra wasn't so tall, she'd probably be a romantic.... But I guess that IS the epitome of the SDs, they seem like elongated Marilyn Monroes. But then, I just found out Phoebe on Friends (Lisa Kudrow) is also a SD. And she's not quite a ripe hourglass to me, she has a slightly defined bust, but it's not the first thing you notice about her, like it can be with Tyra or some other SDs. As for Demi Lovato, has she had a boob job? I googled, and can find some pics where her chest is quite flat, and some others where it's quite lush. But she seems more wide and muscluar to me, so I have no problem typing her in the Naturals-group. And Audrey Hepburn is a FG, isn't she? Maybe I still stuggle so much with this because I can't really see myself clearly, and dislike the style reccomendations of category I probably belong to?
And guys, also what kinda look, style, clothes, hair, accessories this person looks best with... - Julia Roberts is one of those "Amazons", "free" "Mermaids"(like metaphorical embodiment) in real life, essence, close to Mother Nature... They look good in all these Natural(not glamorous) clothes, messy(if I use proper word in English) wavy hair...Mostly only Naturals can look good and ready enough, waking them up in the morning. It's a border identification of Naturals - they look pretty good with messy hair, can get away with, and even achieve some charm with it. Soft Dramatics - I believe, more intense colors in makeup, definitely more precise lines, longer lines, wing eyeliner, definitely - long precisely shaped brows, brighter intense hair colors for a lot of people(while a lot of Naturals wear "natural" blonde, highlights, balayages..). Glam, lashes, glitters. Google Yasmeen Ghauri - a SD signature style from the 90s with accessories and everything
@@FannysLoA I want to preface this by apologizing for the long reply and by assuring you I don’t think your opinions are invalid. I only wish to further explain why I chose the answers I did. When typing lips, I believe there are 2 characteristics that must be considered: width and 3-dimensionality. To illustrate, I will compare the lips of Lilly Cole, Julia Roberts, Angelina Jolie, and Tyra Banks. Lilly Cole’s and Julia Roberts’ lips, at least to me, seem pretty similar in regards to 3-dimensionality-how much they protrude, I mean. They differ in their width: Lilly’s are rather short and Julia’s are rather long. Because this one characteristic is dissimilar, the vibe I get from their lips is different as well. When I look at Lilly Cole’s mouth, I think the word “dainty”. When I look at Julia Robert’s mouth, I think the word “sturdy”. I would say Tyra Banks’ and Angelina Jolie’s lips are pretty similar (though not exactly) in 3-dimensionality, but differ in width. Even though I would have to categorize Jolie’s lips as yin, I still get that “natural” vibe from her. Tyra’s lips do not read as “delicate”, or “strong”, but as “sensual” to me. As with the eyes, I looked at pictures of these ladies without makeup because their shape and size is often altered with lipstick. I’ve noticed that, even if their lips don’t protrude very much, the lips of a romantic tend to only be as wide or a teensy touch wider than the nose. Yang lips seem to go beyond that border. I think these 2 criteria are much more helpful that saying simply “this black person has thinner lips compared to other black people I’ve seen”. Not to trivialize your comment! It is simply that I don’t think race factors that much into Kibbe typing. Straight lines are straight lines in everyone; rounded shapes are rounded shapes in everyone. That said, I would be interested to see how afro-textured hair can be divided into the answer categories, because they are quite different, and that might be my next hobby. As to whether yin lips are more frequent amongst black women: I don’t know, but it is a very interesting question. In regards to the bust: Mind, a B-type bust doesn’t have to be completely flat. Julia is not flat-chested, but the first thing I notice about her torso is her width. That’s not to say she is a football player, of course! It seems that, when looking at the bust, the top of the breasts are very important. Tyra’s are fuller at the top than Julia’s, which gives them more of a rounded look. The flesh looks to be confined to a smaller width than Julia’s which, again, lends itself to the appearance of roundness. I again refer you to my example of the dough, because that’s the only way I know to describe this. With hips, we must think of the width and the outline. Answer A hips are narrow and made of straight, vertical lines. E hips are wide and made up of curved lines. D are narrower, but appear wider than A hips because they are made up of curved lines. B hips are wide and made up of straight lines, but do not appear as straight as A hips because of the added width. Answer C hips I would describe as an elongated curve-like the outline of an oval-and something neither wide nor narrow. These hips form a continuum, almost. If I were to draw Julia Robert’s in a swimsuit, her hips would consist of straight lines. The lines would be a bit soft, but they would be straight. I’m not so sure that Tyra would be a romantic if she weren’t so tall. If I imagine everything about her stays the same, except for her vertical line, she seems more like a gamine type. Because there is that combination of opposites, you see. I don’t want this comment to be too long, and so I’ll compare Phoebe and Tyra Banks in another reply. I’m not sure if Demi Lovato has had a breast augmentation, but even if there was flesh added, her overall shape is still quite straight. She and Audrey Hepburn are flamboyant gamines. To close, I will say that I think we all have certain stereotypes we have to get rid of when thinking of the types and that it is helpful to ask yourself how you would draw these body parts. Also, would you mind telling me your type? I’m a bit curious.
Thank you so much for the video, Merriam! I have 2 questions: 1) Would you ever be willing to do a video on noses? With wide noses, how do you distinguish B from E? 2) I have small eyes that are slightly upturned and heavy-lidded. They're sharp, but "bedroom-y". Would they be C because they're a mixture of yin and yang, or would they be A or D? Thank you.
Hi, I wanna try and give an advice on the nose question, B nose tends to be wide and large in a defined way, the bridge is well structured, for example Christy Turlington's, she doesn't have the largest nose but I think it is a good example of a Natural nose. E nose is softly wide, so the bridge is sort of blurred, example is Rihanna or Marilyn Monroe before her nose job. Also B nose tends to go more straight down and E nose likely tapers out at the bottom, can be bulbous at the tip as well.
@@ju2082 Thanks, that was really helpful! The difference between "blunted angles" and "curves" is a lot more difficult to distinguish than it initially seems to be.
@@TheAfroClub Oh I am glad! I would also like to see a video explaining the test answers with more examples, still not an expert myself. Like with the eyes you mentioned, cannot decide where I would put them, even though when you say bedroom-y that sounds like answer D, does maybe some celebrity have the same or similar ones? I would be interested to see to get a better idea.
@@ju2082 I didn't really have anything better to do, so I made an Imgur post with a few pictures of my eyes. Forgive the shoddy Microsoft Paint work! imgur.com/a/bBWov2Q
@@TheAfroClub Oh my, those are some captivating eyes! Beautiful. I would put them as an answer D, I think the lids are making them appear a bit rounded overall, and also they are upturned, dramatic eyes would make a more of a horizontal straight line. But also I am not extra sure here 😅. May I ask what body type you are considering?
Despite being tall, I knew I wasn't a SD because I don't have that long body line. I'm wide and despite being 5'9 I don't look "tall" and my feet and hands are dainty and narrow. I'm very curvaceous but my bones show through and look sharp. Theatrical romantic makes sense for me.
Hi Merriam! I really enjoyed the video. I watched your video comparing Soft Natural and Soft Dramatic. If I wanted to find out which one I am, what clothes should I try on? I lean towards natural but I think I'm biased since I love boho style.
@@merriamstyle sorry, it's my own damn fault. Your voice definitely has an ASMR quality to them. All the analysis has me convinced I'm best suited to wearing burlap sacks and economy-sized trash bags, though :)
As for Rachel Weisz at 14.15.. I'm not feeling that look.. Those strips, or how to call it.. and the outfit:) I feel like that stuff is maybe more Gamine:) I heard, even maybe like stereotype, that few people can look good with striped shirts.. Maybe also some hip blonde Naturals do..:)
K I am still confused a bit. My yang Features : tall height, really long vertical line, long legs and arms, long hands and feet, almond shaped close spaced eyes, prominent cheekbones, sharp jawline, broad sharp shoulders My yin features: slim hourglass (defined bust hips and waist), fleshy lips and cheeks, small rounded nose Guess I am a soft dramatic then
yes! soft dramatic. how do you look in costume jewelry (like really glamorous looking huge chunky jewelry?). If you don't like it, it's alright, it's more a question of if you pull it off or not. If you can pull it off, you might be SD. Another thing is the hair, if you can do sophia loren type huge hair then SD. And sparkles and lightweight fabrics.
I'm so sorry for commenting so much while I watch the video, Merriam!..:) You just inspired me!:))) And it's always a pleasure to discuss Kibbie with people who have the same minds(like the same subjects:), and since I'm also a bit of a journalist in me:))) Thank you so much for your videos, for your work, Merriam!:)) It really means a lot for us! And the video was also my request too!:)) I was really so happy to see the video!:) I'm also kinda in between. I googled on it, and sometimes they type some people as a few types. The example of a mixture of a TR and a SD - they suggested Susan Lucci!:)
Both of those videos are great, I am confused about being TR or SG for about a year now, it was very helpful to hear your thoughts about this. I am still a little confused though, because I have all skeleton answers D or E, just one A (cheekbones), but I have quite mixed answers in flesh (C, D, E and some A). I tried to find Kibbe type, that would have Yin skeleton and more mixed facial features and flesh, but I didnt find any. I am thinking if I missed something or maybe did the test wrong? I am pretty sure though I have Yin skeleton. Any suggestions? Thanks for your videos, its obvious you put a lot of effort into them.
It's hard to say without taking a look at you of course, but you'd be between TR (TR may still be a possibility depending on how yin your flesh leans), or you could be FG. I'd guess you're more likely FG. Do you look good in super lacy frilly dresses? It would be a great test for you to try super lacy frilly dresses vs something ultra tailored and more stiff. If you're FG, you'll look noticeably awkward in the lacy frilly item. If you're TR, you'll look fine.
@@merriamstyle Thank you for your answer! FG never crossed my mind, I should research it more. Lacy frilly things look OK if they are not flowy (lacy pencil dresses look great on me), ultra fitted definitely looks good, but not in stiff fabric, that look quite hard on me. Also I like edgy look, so I might be little bit inclined to gamine lines if I am TR for that reason.
I recommend this one exercise when deciding between two type-wear the lines/hair/makeup for each type for one month alternately and take many photos,then compare. Which got more positive feedback,wich felt more like yourself etc. If your really stuck in figuring out your kibbe type, are ambitious and love a challenge,you could take the whole year and try on all the types on a month by month basis and see what results.🤗
I think one tip that helped me was paying attention to my shoulders : if your shoulders are quite narrow then your most likely a theatrical romantic Correct me if I’m wrong
Interesting, I was thinking about the same thing for a moment, but then I realised that it might be the size of the head in comparison to the shoulders (but size of the head is considered in vertical line - Merriam talks about it in a video about Lily Cole). Not sure about SD but D can definitely have narrow shoulders in my opinion.
I would say to not overfocus on one answer under basically any circumstance! These TRs happen to have smaller shoulders, but they don't all have to, it's just a coincidence that this happened. You could be a TR with answer B shoulders if the rest of your skeleton is yin-dominant!
Merriam, what is your Kibbe type? I watched your video from three years ago where you talk about the confusion between soft dramatic and theatrical romantic. The entire time I felt like I was watching a home video of myself in my 20’s. I’m for sure what ever type you are!
Thanks! I just watched it! I need to do the try-on experiment still, but I am leaning towards TR for myself. I might have a SG body (real mixed bag of answers) and a TR face (mostly yin), which could be why I can wear both, and also borrow some from SC! Thank you so much for these videos, and recognizing that each type can borrow from different styles! Once I recalled being told in high school that I look better in period costume than modern clothes, and Jenna Coleman and Rachel McAdams look great in period films, that sort of solidified the idea that I am TR. Each time I think, "Am I a Soft Gamine?" I remind myself that although I do look younger than I am, I don't look doll-like or pixie-like, as gamines do, and I look average height with my smallish head. Thanks, too, for reminding us that we will all have features that go against our type. For me, I am flat-chested and straight-bodied. But I am definitely not Natural or Dramatic, because I look schlubby without a defined waist! I look best and get the most compliments with good bras and clothes that give the illusion of an hourglass figure. I need to get more peplum tops and dresses, because they are my best friend!
I see myself similar to Monica Bellucci but my waist ratio is smaller than hers and my face got more TR answers, but still I am quite tall like Rihanna but wider :/
Rather than "awkward", I would say Tyra Banks looks "bigger" than her clothes in theatrical romantic lines. I don't mean "bigger" as in size, but in a figurative, "feeling" sort of way. She feels more grandiose than the clothes. I imagine her bursting through a door very dramatically.
You've gotten me into this awful habit of attempting to type everyone I see. Friends, relatives; passers-by. I watched an old Laurel and Hardy film and even found myself analyzing their features!
I agree, that's a better description!
@@merriamstyle I hope you don’t mind, as it has been quite some time, but I have one disagreement with your analysis of Tyra Banks-that being her nose. In the photographs shown here, it does indeed appear quite sharp and a bit prominent, but I think she must contour it. In photographs wherein she isn’t wearing make-up, her nose actually appears much softer and not as narrow. I imagine you’ve looked at more pictures than I have, so I would be interested to know your reasoning.
Yes!! She looks more like a character, instead of a person, if that makes sense.
I would love more videos on how to dress as a Soft Dramatic. I find it very confusing!
You get more insightful every video! I really appreciate you comparing different and similar cheekbones, jawlines, etc. on the different bodies, and consistently suggesting gamine as an option for people having trouble not fitting squarely in any of the other types. Very helpful. Loving all the TR videos lately, although it has just served to confirm that I am not TR 😂 I would also suggest that for people not at their ideal weight and going back and forth between SD and TR that they also consider Flamboyant Gamine (not just Soft Gamine), since yin flesh can be harder to nail down for us! More on Flamboyant Gamines! xox
This I think is the basic difference between my mother and I. We're discussing this exact point these days so your video couldn't have been timelier for us! Love your work!
My aunt is soft gamine, and the difference among the three of us is so evident when we take your tips to account! You're so on the spot!
yay!!
Very helpful video, thank you! Could you also do a Soft Natural vs. Theatrical Romantic comparison, please.
chrissie yes please!!!
Yes!
14:28 This is a Soft Dramatic wearing "romantic lines". Wouldn't this be the perfect dress for a Soft Natural? I am soft natural, and I think this would look good on me! 🙂
I agree with everything but its amazing how great Rihanna looks in absolutely everything she wears
I wonder if you could also compare the classic types, perhaps with some not by the book examples (like Jada Pinkett being 5'0'' and DC, but not necessarily in regards to height). Also would love you to discuss classic classics, are they such rare of a type or is there more diversity to them than we think? Thanks!
Katya Komlach
Rachel is sooo beautiful! I would have thought she's a Classic, and not a Theatrical Romantic! 😊 Classics are soooo pretty!
Me, a theatrical romantic, hoping my side wins, while knowing it's not a competition.
I've been confused for so long... so I just put my pictures next to them, so I look like a teenager next to Sophia kkk
And I look so much like Rihanna and Mila! Thank You for this video
Thank you for this vid! I’m a Soft Dramatic and I really struggle with feeling sexy, and I definitely don’t identify with the sexy style. But I do love feeling elegant :)
I finally discovered someone who is only 5 ft2 just as me and who is a soft dramatic
But we know Lilly Cole at 5’10” is too tall to be SG so what now?
Can i be 5,7 and TR ive seen videos where it says TR are petite so ... Is that like a no? But i think im TR
Thank you Merriam! This video has been really helpful!
Now that you say that, I feel like I should use a more 'objective' word rather than delicate! Have you considered soft classic? If the ornate things are too much for you, you could be soft classic. Is there a reason why you've discounted it?
@@merriamstyle wow, thank you for your quick answer! I have watched the SC video in the meantime to remember... I have been doubting in the beginning especially whether I could be SC. Mostly because of my "vibe" (which i thought matches both naomi watts and marion cotillard) . But i believe my body is too unbalanced (wide hour glass /pear shape when thinner)
I had some C answers in the test too, they were all on face. So perhaps that influences the necessity for minimalistic jewelry etc?
Haha oops. I just saw your comment on another post about people matching themselves to a celebrity based on their vibe... After posting my reply. :') Guilty... But fortunately i have learned more by now!
To me there really isn't much confusion of overlap between SD and TR, I was much much confused, based of description, between SN and TR. When I took the test it was easier and more clear to me and I was obviously a TR.
In everyway I'm a theatrical romantic but I'm tall so I'm just confused
any soft classics here??!
me! (though the test always says i am classic)
@@Adaphobic ikr i have that problem too. and the hair is the hardest part for me , casually i do look a bit messy never perfect it's hard but i like being a soft classic any way .
I took this test several times. I have no idea what I am so I will contact you I have a thin waist and am shapely but short and not very big on top. I’m not straight like a boy but I doubt I’m a gamine and look a bit like a soft classic but I’m too short. When I was younger I looked more like Meryl Streep so I thought I was a soft classic.
You might still be one but just a tad shorter than they usually are
Mila Kunis is a soft gemine in my eyes.
she does have some elements of TR.
but her waist and feet are not TR. And somehow I think even her face is a bit...more like SD.
What do you think, Merriam?
With her flesh+facial features (and any TR flesh or facial features), you can be either TR or SG. The difference between SG and TR is really in the bones, and Mila doesn't have a mixed skeleton that is slightly yang dominant. But her skeleton is more yin dominant. Then you could say 'well maybe FG because FG has yin skeleton', but her flesh is too soft (FG has yin flesh and features), so, she's TR.
I'd say no way she's SG because she doesn't have a mixed and yang-dominant skeleton. I mention all of this in my SG vs TR vid on my website:
merriamstyle.com/sg_tr.html
Could it be dramatic classic or so, probably not, because her features are not mixed evenly?
I give up😁 I don't know, somehow I just can'tssee her as TR.
but as you said, I will try to see her in different styles and certainly I will see that she looks best in TR.
Kibbe's body typing is amazing. Now umi understand why some things never suit me etc.
all makes perfect sense now ❤️❤️
Thank you for contributing & explaining so much. I hope kibbe watches your videos😊❤️
Just one thing. I have no idea what I am talking about. I can only identify SD and TR. And maybe SG sometimes. But it's more a guess.
So sorry for wasting your time, Merriam. I am new to this all😊😊❤️
awwwww!! Don't worry about it, it's not a waste of time, I'm sure so many people have thought that and now they can read in the comments section about it even if they're one of the 'silent viewers'!!
You know what... Look who other TRs are... Let us say, - Nicole Scherzinger (or even Kim Kardashian, though Aly Art typed her as soft natural, I don't quite agree. TR shows her better)... It is supposed, that they all can, pretty, much rock, slay the same clothes, accessories... Though Mila's makeup maybe is more Gamine, in her case. She wears heavy smokey eye... And it's not the best choice for many TR ideally - as far as I know (I can relate). (too much blending, grunge, when they need more precise lines) But Mila looks good with it, iconic. - An exception in her case
Great video as always . Could you do a video to better understand how the different body parts look like. I have trouble to say whats a sharp shoulder is or a sharp cheekbone. Keira knightley has in my opinion a more dainty cheekbone because its less prominent than penelope cruz for instance.
Definitely theatrical romantic - I look terrible in blazers and sharp lines and try to stay away from them
I find you only describe SDs with negative connotations/words overpowering, broad, so large, awkward, "less dainty", and romantics, gamines, TRs as petite, cute, dainty, small. Not a fan of that
This is definitely worth talking about. Those words are subjective, and while some people may be offended by 'large' and 'less dainty', other people may be equally offended by 'small,' 'dainty', and especially 'cute'.
A lot of gamines and romantics tell me that they feel they aren't taken seriously because of these characteristics. Especially when I mentioned that a romantic may look like she's wearing her boyfriend's blazer instead of her own--this may be quite 'offensive' to some. So I hope we can remember that positive and negative here can be very subjective.
I also never would or should use the word 'broad' to describe soft dramatics because this isn't accurate (it's the natural bone structure that's broad), so if I did, that was in error (although I don't think I did?). Dramatics and Naturals simply are less dainty and small than romantics, and they're also less petite. This isn't inherently positive or negative, and I hope we can all move away from seeing it that way.
I also never used the word 'overpowering' to describe dramatics or naturals. Rather, I say that romantics are easily overpowered by larger lines and shapes, while dramatics aren't. But even if I did, why would overpowering be such a bad thing?
Finally, in my Lily Cole video, I even say that she may be wondering why she looks so awkward all the time (she's a soft gamine), so I do use 'awkward' to describe gamines as well, because they really can look awkward in lines that aren't their own (I think we all do to some extent, but gamines I've noticed especially). On the other hand, romantics and classics can look overpowered or frumpy sometimes in lines that aren't their own (which I also mention in my videos), but they don't seem to look awkward as often from what I've seen.
I really believe that for every dramatic who wants to look shorter, there's a romantic who wants to look taller. The grass is always greener, but I hope that through learning about kibbe body typing, we can see the unique beauty in each type, and work with our bodies' lines instead of against them!!
@@merriamstyle I agree. I'm a soft dramatic, and I've always liked my body type. I wish my facial features had more yin, but it is what it is. I admire looks on every part of the yin-yang spectrum.
this was very helpful. I’m so glad you showed the examples of Rihanna, who is a tall TR, and compared her to a SD.
This is so helpful! Soft dramatic vs. theatrical romantic is my exact dilemma. Thank you for talking about some of the lesser talked about Kibbe types :)
Please a video about naturals and how we can achieve different looks (sexy, cute, feminine). I know you have one on soft naturals but can you make one on "pure" naturals? Pleease 🙏
I second that! And flamboyant naturals please! :)
To me Rihanna has always seem mistyped in the TR category because the average tallest height in TR is 5’6” and Rihanna is 5’8” plus she seems to have a more balanced and classic face compared to like Rachel McAdams and also bigger boned structurally than other TRs. Just wondered what your thoughts were, or if there’s an explanation for the inconsistencies?
Rihanna is a SD; Rachel McAdams is a SN. Merriam classified these celebreties not according to Kibbe's system but her own (without knowing it yet) using Kibbe's vocabulary.
TR are actually smaller than that so I'm confused
Rihanna was confirmed TR by kibbe himself
@@oceane6018that’s because he thinks she’s below 5’6. She’s 5’8. I’m the same height as her, people say I look like her also. She’s a SD
Rihanna is a Soft Dramatic with flamboyant gamine influence though. If you look at her old pictures you can see that she has a very straight body and not that curvy.
I'm between soft natural and theatrical romantic 🤦♀️
Merriam I saw your video in your site and I loved it. Please, make a video with the difference between theatrical romantic and romantic.
Thank you Leticia, I will do that!!
@@merriamstyle I cant wait for that! I love your channel! Huges from Brazil!
Thanks. This is very helpful! I’m a soft dramatic who sometimes feels influenced to wear very romantic clothing at the influence of my friends! I always feel like some awkward, lanky giant but I feel right comfy and at home in severe lines. I get so much style advice but it gets lost in translation. Thanks for helping me understand why.
The only feminine bones I have are small hands and feet! I also always wondered why my arms are as long as a monkey’s. This explains it! *whew* Lol i would love to see a side by side comparison like this for all dramatic types!
Please could you make a video for SOFT DRAMATIC VS FLAMBOYANT NATURAL. THANK YOU
Yeeeees please!!
Plz do romantic and soft natural next.
SidraM That would be so awesome. I would like to see sexier looks for soft naturals.
I wonder, if a soft natural could put on soft gamine lines? ☺
Yes that would be amazing
It would be really nice if you´d want to make a video about flamboyant naturals, it would be really helpful to learn more about different styles/impressions that are possible using their lines :) 'Cause I feel quite limited honestly
Also! It´s nice to see that you pst so often, your videos are always so in depth, they´re fantastic
Thank you Sara!!
Merriam Style
I sort of feel like it’s hard to look more classy/elegant as flamboyant natural lines sometimes feel like just baggy clothes to me.
Also having a more feminine or cute vibe, that feels almost impossible as a flamboyant natural
Thank you for answering!
I completely agree! If I were a celebrity and had a life style that allowed me to have crazy, wild hair and big, elaborate clothing, I would find it easier, but to make it work in a regular job takes more effort, I think.
Only Problem: Rihanna isn't a TR but SD.
What is she?
15:02 but woman on right looks AMAZING in that soft gamine dress
Your knowledge is really admirable! Through your videos I finally determined I'm TR. Eye opening! I hope to start dressing for my body type as soon as possible. But it's quite difficult to find clothes for TR in mainstream stores.
Yay that's awesome! Have you watched my casual looks for R and TR? I'd say it'd be good to watch both. In casual looks for R, I mention how there are lots of ways to add yin aside from lace and frills. R does not always mean ultra frilly, you can do other things like gathers, fittedness, lightweight fabrics, waist emphasis, etc. But anyway, hope you check those out if you haven't already!
@@merriamstyle Thanks for the reference! I'll check those videos! I've started to explore body types recently. I hope to order your style analysis some time this year because there are still so many questions plus I want to figure out my skin undertone. Now I understand why some clothes fit perfectly and some just look awful. Thanks for your work and effort!
Hi Merriam! I would love to know what you think of this:
Bigbang is my favorite South Korean band and I think they're very unique! All five of them have different body types. (As per my observation)
G-dragon: Flamboyant Gamine
Top: Soft Dramatic
Taeyang: Romantic
Daesung: Natural
Seungri: Soft Classic
And GD is THE fashion icon! You're a gamine too so maybe you'll like his style!
NO WAY!!! I tried to type Bigbang as well (failed miserably though) :D I never thought that someone would do the same thing.
@@PattyFru Yes! 😃 I tried to type them like this as GD literally never gets over-powered by any outfits and it made me curious of his body type. Kibbe works for everybody! Lol
I wanted to discuss this with someone but no-ones into it like me.
@@PattyFru What do you think their body types are?
@@poojaasharma To be honest I am terrible in typing men :D I agree with G-dragon, mostly because like you said, he can pull ANY outfit (any in this case means combined, contrasted), more "crazy" the better.
Not sure about Taeyang - TR or R, but definitely romantic family
Yes! GD is definitely FG, I admire how he can rock eccentric style so well. Another SK boy group that I could type as well is BTS:
Jin: Soft Dramatic
Namjoon/RM: Flamboyant Natural
Yoongi/Suga: Gamine
Hoseok: Flamboyant Gamine
Jimin: Soft Gamine
Taehyung: Classic
Jungkook: Soft Natural
Great video! Btw, it would be amazing if you could explain the Kibbe test!!!
Both of those videos are great ! You really explain clearly the bone structure which I find more difficult to see.
I would be very interested in a video on Flamboyant Gamine both in body type and in clothing lines.
Seconding the request for a FG video 👍
I think I'm soft dramatic but I don't have a large bust (as in big) and my face is not as angular as the models usually shown
Tyra isn't overpowered by larger lines, but she doesn't seem to look her personal best in most of these clothes either
Could you create a similar video for Soft Classic vs Theatrical Romantic? I know I'm definitely not SD or SG, but I keep going back and forth between SC and TR.
Interesting. However note that both Tyra and Rihanna had nose jobs. Both noses were naturally wider and flatter.
@MerriamStyle , I think I've finally found my body type! (maybe I'm still wrong hehe). The first time I did the test, I undoubtedly identified me with the Soft Natural type. I admit that I wasn't objective, I've always had a weakness for the Boho style and I have used the natural-free style without questioning whether it suited me or not.
Nevertheless, I began to doubt if my body would be a Soft Dramatic. I have Hands & Feets A, Arms & Legs A, Cheekbones A and a height of 5ft 7in (172cm). But the rest of my characteristics are D/E and I don't think I am so voluptuous and big as a Soft Dramatic... So, maybe a Theatrical Romantic?
What has confused me the most has always been my height. Although I look like shorter and I've got a lot of Yin influence, when I take me photos with other people many times I'm taller than theirs, so that has made me think sometimes that I don't look delicate enough as a Theatrical Romantic. However, as you have shown us there are Romantic celebrities like Rihanna, Charlize Theron or Beyonce who are tall.
Another thing that has made me confused is that I don't feel identified with the Theatrical Romantic style. Although I like it, I have always tended to dress myself bohemian and relaxed.
So I think I can finally be a Theatrical Romantic... I just wanted to tell you about my experience, Merriam! I would like to know what you think :).Thanks for all your work, it's amazing! xx
Can theatrical romantics *be* quite tall? I‘d say I look very ying leaning apart from maybe a few blunter features but nothing about me is really *sharp*. I did the test and got theatrical romantic, which I would agree with apart from the fact that everyone says romantics can only be short... i‘m confused
I would love to hear you talk more about flamboyant naturals :)
hellothere friend Flamboyant naturals are so beautiful! 😍
I'm a soft natural... 😔
Great video! The comparisons you made are very insightful (:
I know you've done a lot of videos lately about TR, but I would love to see one about TR vs Romantic. As far as I've seen (and please correct me if I'm wrong), there isn't really that much of a difference in what these 2 types can wear? Also, can TR have their yin come from B answers?
Thanks again for all the work you put into your videos!
Yes, I'd say the difference between R and TR is much smaller in terms of the clothes than let's say, D and SD. But generally, TR has more sharpness at the edges (I'm not sure if you watched my video on casual looks for TR but I talk about it there)!
@@merriamstyle Thanks for responding to my question! Yes I've watched that video but I might rewatch anyway. (:
In your opinion, would a R look worse in TR clothes than vice versa?
I don't think either would look worse or vice versa. I think that TR would look cute in R clothing, because it'll be as a contrast to their dainty angularity, TR may look slightly more like SG in R clothing.
Then, R would look more badass and overtly sexual potentially in TR clothing (sort of like the same effect when TR wears SG clothing if you watched my Rachel McAdams video)!!
From yin to yang in the skeleton, we have, R, TR, SG. To look more badass, R can wear TR, TR can wear SG. To look more cute and childlike, SG can wear TR, and TR can wear R (going in the other direction). That's my little 'theory'!!
R can also wear SG to look pretty badass as I showed in that Rachel McAdams video!
Merriam Style Such a fascinating theory!
@@merriamstyle Oooh I love that theory. My favourite part of your videos is how you use the info about Kibbe types and apply it in real life/find patterns within the rules. Great work as usual - thank you so much! (:
How is Lily Cole a soft gamine? She's taller with very long legs in proportion to her body, a smaller head and a long vertical line? I mean look at her in pics with other SGs... She's so big
I saw her classified as soft classic…
@@Hanna-nw8mn well she's not as blended and symmetrical as a classic would be.
I mean basically on the system we would have the same body type. Which is ridiculous if you would look at the two of us side by side. I can't think that what would be flattering on her would be the same for me.
Soft gamines aren't always short with short legs, this is just a stereotype! I did an entire video on Lily Cole that you could check out if you're interested!
@@4Distractiononly Oh, I just realised I was thinking about Lily James...surely she is a soft classic, not Lily Cole, my bad!
Rihanna is 5’8” so TRs can also be tall, but look shorter. A lot of people think TRs are petite as in height.
Merriam, you explain this so well, I have two questions for you :) First: what's your thought on women who have a slight yang undercurrent in the facial features, not in the bone structure, but where the rest of the test answers are D and E? My sister has all D and E answers in her skeletal bones (body and face) and body flesh, but her eyes and lips are B and A? That doesn't fit the description of her yang undercurrent coming from her bones, but she's still primarily yin with a slight yang undercurrent and looks amazing in TR clothing. Would she still be considered TR? Second: I also wonder about women who have wide and round bones like romantics, but with a slight yang undercurrent in the facial bones (all flesh = yin). I find that most examples of theatrical romantics are of women who are not as wide as romantics, more delicately feminine. But if you have E answers in flesh and bones (body), and therefore have a body who looks romantic, but with some sharpness in the facial bones, you'd still be theatrical romantic...? Thank you for all the work you put in, you're a great inspiration!
Is it accurate to say that theatrical romantics will feel that typically yang clothes will make them look/feel 'masculine'? If I wear yang lines I feel like I look awful and my instant thought is 'it makes me look masculine'. Since doing the kibbe quiz and spending a lot of time better understanding the system, I'm certain I'm theatrical romantic. So then I got thinking - is the reason typically yang clothes make me feel like I look 'too masculine' because I'm so yin dominant that it completely clashes and overpowers rather than compliments?
TF I feel the same happens to me. Thanks for pointing that out. I feel so unattractive when I wear yang only lines and as soon as I add some delicate yin like a thin yet ornate necklace or a ruffled neckline I feel so much more satisfied with how I look.
All of the references to Flamboyant Gamines in this video makes me hopeful that the next video you make will be for FGs!
I couldn't definite if I were theatrical romantic or soft gamine or soft dramatic while my face is more Sophia Loren, but my body is more romantic more soft. BUT my height is pure Gamine. Thanks to this video I know that Im Soft Dramatic. Little Soft Dramatic 😊
I love your videos so much omg
I think I am Theatrical Romantic but I also have curves on top and bottom. Always have even when I dropped to a size four. Could you do a video on the differences between romantic and class? Because someone told me I was soft classic where other people tell me I am Theatrical Romantic.
Yes I’m a soft natural who used to dress almost exclusively in and is attracted to theatrical romantic styles - help!!! I’m intrigued by the goddess lines of SN that I could explore please, and how not to appear larger in TR lines (ie accommodating my SN lines). LOVE your videos as ever, thank you so much!!! 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻❤️❤️❤️
I think Soft Gamines often have this doll cuteness("няшность" по-русски очень слэнговым, жаргонным выражением:)... Like Ethereal:) Or like complicated face bone structure - like Kourtney Kardashian, Sazan Hendrix, Teni Panosyan, rock energy in their face.. Look very deinty - teen girl or boyish, in the best way. And they pull off bright lip and eye together well, for example, smokey eyes. TR and SD - is a Woman... All different makeup - more precise lines(Real smokey eyes from Aly Art video is a very questionable choice), longer brows, shimmer finish for TR, SD, look good in glitter. Different accessories for TR , SD and SG..:) Kim and Koutney had a fitting for their VS model Halloween looks. And there is one famous pic of them, in one outfit with angular lines... It suits Kortney so much!... Matches her face with lines... - And it doesn't suit Kim... But the glitter that it has on.. It suits Kim so much, by nature!... I wrote a comment there, based on Kibbie... Interesting, hudreds of people liked it not knowing about Kibbie, haha
I think that word in russian, in quotations, would be best translated as 'delicate' in english. :)
But I wouldn't say all soft gamines look doll like, I don't think Halle Berry or Hayden Panettiere (both soft gamines) look particularly doll like (this is more ingenue).
@@merriamstyle it is like "cute cute cute cute" - I'm saying in a higher voice, with a smile, that word is very Internet slang:) Full load of cuteness, in a good way:))
Stereotype that sometimes works out well..:)
Someone wrote about their mom... I think my mom is a SG too, and she is not this delicate..
I think I am a Soft Dramatic. The most important thing for me is to dress for my vertical. If I don't do it, the whole outfit does not look good on me. I cannot wear a black T- shirt and white jeans, or seperates in general. Im 1,67 cm, but I have a long vertical line. A lot of people think I am taller. Even my sport clothes have to look chic. As a teatrical Romantic you can wear seperates. In general the biggest mistake a Soft Dramatic and a pure Dramatic can make, is to cut their body in two parts. As a Soft Dramatic you have to dress 80% like a pure Dramatic and 20 % you take from the Romantics. Not the other way. I see a lot of Soft Dramatics, who dress way to Romantic. To much softness is not working for a Soft Dramatic.
I feel more comfortable wearing a single line most of the time (or monochromatic maybe) but the bad thing is that I can also wear dark colors on the top and light or medium tones on the bottom and that confuses me, but I still feel more comfortable feeling a little soft dramatic even though I can wear those color cuts sometimes and I don't know what to do.
And what is the difference in the test between soft dramatic and pure gamine? They both have answers A and E but what differentiates them mainly in the distribution of responses in the bone and flesh? Thank you!
As for tall TR, like Rihanna... I'm thinking of singer Justine Skye! She is 1.80. Looked to me 1.65. She is likely a TR. Though maybe, maybe a SD - not this likely. She pulls off TR style just greatly
yes just googled her and she is a TR I think. SD lines look too heavy on her, and a V neck line doesn't suit her. And SG lines make her look more womanly/badass.
I did the test again, after someone commenting that my saying that I am very narrow but still have some softness is 'pretty much the definition of theatrical romantic'
And I have figured out this: my flesh is a combination of C and D, and my bones a combination of D, C and A - which are, like, 3 answers (body & face combined, with my vertical line being B-A), and I have *kind of* returned to possible being a theatrical romantic, which can be right. A lot fo the 'good for TR' styles work quite well on me. I wouldn't know sure though as I have very little TR clothes. It's also funny, because when I first got into kibbe, my instinct was 'theatrical romantic obviously!' but then got a bit carried of because I didn't exactly fullfill stereotypes exactly. I am/look a bit taller than the average TR and I don't really have a hardcore hourglass figure. There's waist definition...A dent...But my waist is rather an answer C. I am also generally not as 'fleshy' but I am a bit underweight, and considering my weight I *should* be bonier, which I am not. The only place in my body where you can really see bones is my ridicilously thin neck and my knobbly elbows.
Can one be soft gamine with a height of 1.72? My head is big so i don't look tall, my nose, eyes and lips are also big, so i kinda look like SD, flesh is soft like Rihanna, which is TR, i guess i could be SG... Brilliant, thank you, i was so confused!
Anything this confusing is not helpful. I have watched so many of these video and I think it is a bunch of nonsense.
Dramatic vs natural vs flamboyant natural please
omg yes please
Yes, would like to see that. In my opinion, if naturals are squarish and dramatics are rectangular, flamboyant naturals, being a mix of the two would be a T shape (I know, I could have described all these types better lol but this is how I understand it)
I'm torn between these two agghhhh
I'm still very confused about my body type, but I finally understood what answer my jawline is. I'm making progress, I guess! 😅 Typing ourselves is so hard...
These two are so alike.... I thought I was TR, but it was the height range that helped me... definitely a SD
I was nodding at everything said in the SG vs. TR video!!
Rihanna is tall , you can't be TR if you're 5'8. You don't have to have larger bones to be soft dramatic either and you can be short and be soft dramatic with elongation. I don't find this helpful
Great video
yay, thank you for all your support Alvyonzo!!
Are you able to be a soft dramatic without being curvy?
Hey! I have recently come across a polish stylist who offers kibbe consults just like you. She also types celebrities. But i have found that her typings quite frequently do not much yours. For example Monica Bellucci is romantic, Brigitte bardot is soft natural, Rachel Weisz is theatrical romantic, Mila Kunis Megan fox as a soft natural... it kinda breaks my faith in Kibbe typing hahha. Do you have any idea why the confusion happens?
And the list goes on...
Nina dobrev as a soft dramatic :o
Hey! I know a lot of stylists, fashion theoreticians type people differently..:) The world wasn't built on Kibble..:) Different minds, different perception, different taste even, the system is pretty complicated and there seems to be always some little approaches added to it..:) Kibble himself would mistype people not once and acknowledges it....
for me everything in Keira screams dramatic but her height, she looks very short but everyone online says otherwise.🤷🏽♀️
I am still struggling. I know my bones are yang, but unsure how much soft flesh I have. Also unsure if they're wide enough for FN....
I mean, I struggle to see the difference between Tyra Banks and Julia Roberts. Both are tall, curvy and with big eyes and lips, yet Julia is apparenly an FN...
Can you please also take a look at LeeLee Sobieski, who seems pretty hard to type, and perhaps some famous girl bands where we see many types next to each other? Like The Spice Girls, Destiny's Child, All Saints, Dixie Chicks and so forth?
I'm by no means an expert, but I thought it would be interesting to compare Tyra Banks and Julia Roberts and I wanted to help.
Julia's lips aren't really full; they're just quite broad. For me, they are the perfect example of a B-lip. Tyra's lips are not as wide, but they are fuller. And actually, I think this lack of broadness lends itself towards her lips being fuller. If I make dough and place it in a small pan, it will look plumper than if I took the same amount and covered a large cookie-sheet with it. This is applicable to Julia's bust as well.
The eyes are a bit tricky because makeup can really change their appearance a lot. After looking and comparing photos of the two without makeup, I would say Julia's are answer A and Tyra's lean more towards E. They are a bit close together, which may cause someone to answer D, but the shape is more rounded with the absence of any makeup. Most eye-makeup seems to lift the eyes at the corners.
If, by curvy, you mean to say both have prominent busts and hips and/or a defined waist, I would disagree.
I would call Tyra's bust an answer E because, even as a supermodel (and presumably very thin), she had a rather large bust. Julia's bust I would call answer B. She has a chest, to be sure, but it isn't prominent when compared to the entirety of her body. I think this is probably to do with the overall width of her body-a feature of naturals, of course.
Robert's hip-line is answer B and does not really appear "curved" to me. If you compare them to Banks', which are quite literally rounded in shape, it becomes very obvious.
For their waists, I would say Robert's is answer B and Banks' is answer A.
But, the most important question is: What is the most noticeable thing about them? I would say that, with Tyra, I notice length and lushness atop that. For Julia, broadness is the first thing I notice.
Something to note about the "Curves" of a yang type:
Despite a prominent bust or hip-line, the overall shape of a yang type is quite straight. Demi Lovato is a great example of this.
The "defined waist" of a yang type is more angular than rounded, as with a yin type, and brings out the angularity of their bones. Audrey Hepburn is a great example of this.
I hope this was helpful and please feel free to argue with me. I love to hear other people's opinions.
@@unneighborlyarcades6356 This was very insightful, thank you.
Julia has admitted to putting a filler in her top lip, claiming it was much smaller than her bottom. So I can agree that her lips aren't THAT full, and that they are more wide than they are full, but they are still quite full and makes her appear rather soft.
Tyras lips may be fuller because she's black? I'm not quite sure how race plays in to Kibbe, but even though her lips are full, they're not sticking out as "full for a black woman", I think? More average sized, compared to, say her rival on the runway; Naomi Campbell. But maybe that's not relevant at all, and almost all black women will have a yin answer on the lips?
Tyra's bust is definately large and noticeable regardless of her overall body size, but I think Julia's bust would be a D, or maybe C, definately not a B answer as I find her boobs a little too big to fit a B answer. I think Tyra currely uses a bit of shapewear on her waist, making her appear more curved than she really is, because when I looked up pics from her modelling career, I can agree that her waist is more of an A answer. However, she has said she gains first around the middle, which could make it more of a B answer, but she appears these days to have a D answer. Julia does seem to be a clear B, even some hint of abs there. But her hips seems more of a C to me, where'as Tyra's are an E like her bust. But if I take away Julia's lips, I'm not sure broadness is the first thing I notice about her, whereas Tyra is definately a ripe hourglass with long limbs. So if Tyra wasn't so tall, she'd probably be a romantic....
But I guess that IS the epitome of the SDs, they seem like elongated Marilyn Monroes.
But then, I just found out Phoebe on Friends (Lisa Kudrow) is also a SD. And she's not quite a ripe hourglass to me, she has a slightly defined bust, but it's not the first thing you notice about her, like it can be with Tyra or some other SDs.
As for Demi Lovato, has she had a boob job? I googled, and can find some pics where her chest is quite flat, and some others where it's quite lush. But she seems more wide and muscluar to me, so I have no problem typing her in the Naturals-group. And Audrey Hepburn is a FG, isn't she?
Maybe I still stuggle so much with this because I can't really see myself clearly, and dislike the style reccomendations of category I probably belong to?
And guys, also what kinda look, style, clothes, hair, accessories this person looks best with... - Julia Roberts is one of those "Amazons", "free" "Mermaids"(like metaphorical embodiment) in real life, essence, close to Mother Nature... They look good in all these Natural(not glamorous) clothes, messy(if I use proper word in English) wavy hair...Mostly only Naturals can look good and ready enough, waking them up in the morning. It's a border identification of Naturals - they look pretty good with messy hair, can get away with, and even achieve some charm with it. Soft Dramatics - I believe, more intense colors in makeup, definitely more precise lines, longer lines, wing eyeliner, definitely - long precisely shaped brows, brighter intense hair colors for a lot of people(while a lot of Naturals wear "natural" blonde, highlights, balayages..). Glam, lashes, glitters. Google Yasmeen Ghauri - a SD signature style from the 90s with accessories and everything
@@FannysLoA I want to preface this by apologizing for the long reply and by assuring you I don’t think your opinions are invalid. I only wish to further explain why I chose the answers I did.
When typing lips, I believe there are 2 characteristics that must be considered: width and 3-dimensionality.
To illustrate, I will compare the lips of Lilly Cole, Julia Roberts, Angelina Jolie, and Tyra Banks.
Lilly Cole’s and Julia Roberts’ lips, at least to me, seem pretty similar in regards to 3-dimensionality-how much they protrude, I mean. They differ in their width: Lilly’s are rather short and Julia’s are rather long. Because this one characteristic is dissimilar, the vibe I get from their lips is different as well. When I look at Lilly Cole’s mouth, I think the word “dainty”. When I look at Julia Robert’s mouth, I think the word “sturdy”. I would say Tyra Banks’ and Angelina Jolie’s lips are pretty similar (though not exactly) in 3-dimensionality, but differ in width. Even though I would have to categorize Jolie’s lips as yin, I still get that “natural” vibe from her. Tyra’s lips do not read as “delicate”, or “strong”, but as “sensual” to me. As with the eyes, I looked at pictures of these ladies without makeup because their shape and size is often altered with lipstick.
I’ve noticed that, even if their lips don’t protrude very much, the lips of a romantic tend to only be as wide or a teensy touch wider than the nose. Yang lips seem to go beyond that border. I think these 2 criteria are much more helpful that saying simply “this black person has thinner lips compared to other black people I’ve seen”. Not to trivialize your comment! It is simply that I don’t think race factors that much into Kibbe typing. Straight lines are straight lines in everyone; rounded shapes are rounded shapes in everyone. That said, I would be interested to see how afro-textured hair can be divided into the answer categories, because they are quite different, and that might be my next hobby. As to whether yin lips are more frequent amongst black women: I don’t know, but it is a very interesting question.
In regards to the bust:
Mind, a B-type bust doesn’t have to be completely flat. Julia is not flat-chested, but the first thing I notice about her torso is her width. That’s not to say she is a football player, of course! It seems that, when looking at the bust, the top of the breasts are very important. Tyra’s are fuller at the top than Julia’s, which gives them more of a rounded look. The flesh looks to be confined to a smaller width than Julia’s which, again, lends itself to the appearance of roundness. I again refer you to my example of the dough, because that’s the only way I know to describe this.
With hips, we must think of the width and the outline. Answer A hips are narrow and made of straight, vertical lines. E hips are wide and made up of curved lines. D are narrower, but appear wider than A hips because they are made up of curved lines. B hips are wide and made up of straight lines, but do not appear as straight as A hips because of the added width. Answer C hips I would describe as an elongated curve-like the outline of an oval-and something neither wide nor narrow. These hips form a continuum, almost. If I were to draw Julia Robert’s in a swimsuit, her hips would consist of straight lines. The lines would be a bit soft, but they would be straight. I’m not so sure that Tyra would be a romantic if she weren’t so tall. If I imagine everything about her stays the same, except for her vertical line, she seems more like a gamine type. Because there is that combination of opposites, you see.
I don’t want this comment to be too long, and so I’ll compare Phoebe and Tyra Banks in another reply. I’m not sure if Demi Lovato has had a breast augmentation, but even if there was flesh added, her overall shape is still quite straight. She and Audrey Hepburn are flamboyant gamines.
To close, I will say that I think we all have certain stereotypes we have to get rid of when thinking of the types and that it is helpful to ask yourself how you would draw these body parts. Also, would you mind telling me your type? I’m a bit curious.
@@nanagursky188 You are definitely correct that the most sure indicator is what type of clothing, hair, and makeup suits a person best!
Im confused whether I'm soft natural or romantic
At 09:30 Rihanna looks almost taller than Tyra, it's amazing
Please, do flamboyant gamine!
Thank you so much for the video, Merriam! I have 2 questions:
1) Would you ever be willing to do a video on noses? With wide noses, how do you distinguish B from E?
2) I have small eyes that are slightly upturned and heavy-lidded. They're sharp, but "bedroom-y". Would they be C because they're a mixture of yin and yang, or would they be A or D? Thank you.
Hi, I wanna try and give an advice on the nose question, B nose tends to be wide and large in a defined way, the bridge is well structured, for example Christy Turlington's, she doesn't have the largest nose but I think it is a good example of a Natural nose. E nose is softly wide, so the bridge is sort of blurred, example is Rihanna or Marilyn Monroe before her nose job. Also B nose tends to go more straight down and E nose likely tapers out at the bottom, can be bulbous at the tip as well.
@@ju2082 Thanks, that was really helpful! The difference between "blunted angles" and "curves" is a lot more difficult to distinguish than it initially seems to be.
@@TheAfroClub Oh I am glad! I would also like to see a video explaining the test answers with more examples, still not an expert myself. Like with the eyes you mentioned, cannot decide where I would put them, even though when you say bedroom-y that sounds like answer D, does maybe some celebrity have the same or similar ones? I would be interested to see to get a better idea.
@@ju2082 I didn't really have anything better to do, so I made an Imgur post with a few pictures of my eyes. Forgive the shoddy Microsoft Paint work!
imgur.com/a/bBWov2Q
@@TheAfroClub Oh my, those are some captivating eyes! Beautiful. I would put them as an answer D, I think the lids are making them appear a bit rounded overall, and also they are upturned, dramatic eyes would make a more of a horizontal straight line. But also I am not extra sure here 😅. May I ask what body type you are considering?
Despite being tall, I knew I wasn't a SD because I don't have that long body line. I'm wide and despite being 5'9 I don't look "tall" and my feet and hands are dainty and narrow. I'm very curvaceous but my bones show through and look sharp. Theatrical romantic makes sense for me.
Hi Merriam! I really enjoyed the video. I watched your video comparing Soft Natural and Soft Dramatic. If I wanted to find out which one I am, what clothes should I try on? I lean towards natural but I think I'm biased since I love boho style.
these Kibbe analysis videos annoy me to no end, and yet I can't stop watching...
what a nice comment to leave.
@@merriamstyle sorry, it's my own damn fault. Your voice definitely has an ASMR quality to them. All the analysis has me convinced I'm best suited to wearing burlap sacks and economy-sized trash bags, though :)
As for Rachel Weisz at 14.15.. I'm not feeling that look.. Those strips, or how to call it.. and the outfit:) I feel like that stuff is maybe more Gamine:) I heard, even maybe like stereotype, that few people can look good with striped shirts.. Maybe also some hip blonde Naturals do..:)
yeah, I'm not feeling the stripes either, but I liked the blazer on her!
I feel like you have a great eye. This video is so helpful.
K I am still confused a bit.
My yang Features : tall height, really long vertical line, long legs and arms, long hands and feet, almond shaped close spaced eyes, prominent cheekbones, sharp jawline, broad sharp shoulders
My yin features: slim hourglass (defined bust hips and waist), fleshy lips and cheeks, small rounded nose
Guess I am a soft dramatic then
yes! soft dramatic. how do you look in costume jewelry (like really glamorous looking huge chunky jewelry?). If you don't like it, it's alright, it's more a question of if you pull it off or not. If you can pull it off, you might be SD. Another thing is the hair, if you can do sophia loren type huge hair then SD. And sparkles and lightweight fabrics.
Wow thanks :)))
Love Keira Knightley in that picture in romantic lines:) At least, from the phone:))
i now think i am either a soft classic or a flamboyant gamine!! Is that two really odd ones to be confused over? haha
How is Lily Cole a soft gamine when she's 5ft 10.5?
I'm almost totally romantic but my nose is yang. TR?
Where did you learn so much about facial structures and skin tones? Is there a book I read?
I'm so sorry for commenting so much while I watch the video, Merriam!..:) You just inspired me!:))) And it's always a pleasure to discuss Kibbie with people who have the same minds(like the same subjects:), and since I'm also a bit of a journalist in me:)))
Thank you so much for your videos, for your work, Merriam!:)) It really means a lot for us! And the video was also my request too!:))
I was really so happy to see the video!:)
I'm also kinda in between. I googled on it, and sometimes they type some people as a few types. The example of a mixture of a TR and a SD - they suggested Susan Lucci!:)
awwww thank you for all your support + comments! I really enjoy discussing this and am always waiting for comments by the computer right after I post!
Both of those videos are great, I am confused about being TR or SG for about a year now, it was very helpful to hear your thoughts about this. I am still a little confused though, because I have all skeleton answers D or E, just one A (cheekbones), but I have quite mixed answers in flesh (C, D, E and some A). I tried to find Kibbe type, that would have Yin skeleton and more mixed facial features and flesh, but I didnt find any. I am thinking if I missed something or maybe did the test wrong? I am pretty sure though I have Yin skeleton. Any suggestions?
Thanks for your videos, its obvious you put a lot of effort into them.
It's hard to say without taking a look at you of course, but you'd be between TR (TR may still be a possibility depending on how yin your flesh leans), or you could be FG. I'd guess you're more likely FG. Do you look good in super lacy frilly dresses?
It would be a great test for you to try super lacy frilly dresses vs something ultra tailored and more stiff. If you're FG, you'll look noticeably awkward in the lacy frilly item. If you're TR, you'll look fine.
@@merriamstyle Thank you for your answer! FG never crossed my mind, I should research it more. Lacy frilly things look OK if they are not flowy (lacy pencil dresses look great on me), ultra fitted definitely looks good, but not in stiff fabric, that look quite hard on me. Also I like edgy look, so I might be little bit inclined to gamine lines if I am TR for that reason.
Oh my God, THANK YOU for this video!! Now I am 100% sure I'm a TR - the mix of yin and yang can really confuse us!
I recommend this one exercise when deciding between two type-wear the lines/hair/makeup for each type for one month alternately and take many photos,then compare. Which got more positive feedback,wich felt more like yourself etc. If your really stuck in figuring out your kibbe type, are ambitious and love a challenge,you could take the whole year and try on all the types on a month by month basis and see what results.🤗
I think one tip that helped me was paying attention to my shoulders : if your shoulders are quite narrow then your most likely a theatrical romantic
Correct me if I’m wrong
Interesting, I was thinking about the same thing for a moment, but then I realised that it might be the size of the head in comparison to the shoulders (but size of the head is considered in vertical line - Merriam talks about it in a video about Lily Cole). Not sure about SD but D can definitely have narrow shoulders in my opinion.
I would say to not overfocus on one answer under basically any circumstance! These TRs happen to have smaller shoulders, but they don't all have to, it's just a coincidence that this happened. You could be a TR with answer B shoulders if the rest of your skeleton is yin-dominant!
Is it possible at all to be 5'6 and a TR?
Merriam, what is your Kibbe type? I watched your video from three years ago where you talk about the confusion between soft dramatic and theatrical romantic. The entire time I felt like I was watching a home video of myself in my 20’s. I’m for sure what ever type you are!
Please make a video on the
essence of tr 🥰
Rachel weiscz looks more TR
So helpful! Please also do Theatrical Romantic vs. Soft Gamine!
Here's a TR vs SG video on my website! merriamstyle.com/sg_tr.html
It's premiering on youtube in a few days. :)
Thanks! I just watched it! I need to do the try-on experiment still, but I am leaning towards TR for myself. I might have a SG body (real mixed bag of answers) and a TR face (mostly yin), which could be why I can wear both, and also borrow some from SC!
Thank you so much for these videos, and recognizing that each type can borrow from different styles! Once I recalled being told in high school that I look better in period costume than modern clothes, and Jenna Coleman and Rachel McAdams look great in period films, that sort of solidified the idea that I am TR. Each time I think, "Am I a Soft Gamine?" I remind myself that although I do look younger than I am, I don't look doll-like or pixie-like, as gamines do, and I look average height with my smallish head.
Thanks, too, for reminding us that we will all have features that go against our type. For me, I am flat-chested and straight-bodied. But I am definitely not Natural or Dramatic, because I look schlubby without a defined waist! I look best and get the most compliments with good bras and clothes that give the illusion of an hourglass figure. I need to get more peplum tops and dresses, because they are my best friend!
I see myself similar to Monica Bellucci but my waist ratio is smaller than hers and my face got more TR answers, but still I am quite tall like Rihanna but wider :/