Aerojet Rocketdyne's RL10C-X rocket engine to debut in 2025 on ULA Vulcan rocket

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 сен 2024
  • After years of development and testing, the latest iteration of one of the longest tenured rocket engines has a target debut date. On the 60th anniversary of the first successful use of the RL10 engine, Aerojet Rocketdyne announced the RL10C-X will first fly onboard a ULA Vulcan rocket in 2025.
    RL10 engines have been used in multiple launch vehicles, like the Atlas V, Saturn 1, Delta IV and NASA's Space Launch System rocket.
    Read more on our website: spaceflightnow...
    This coverage is made possible by the support of our members. Join this channel to help us expand our coverage and get access to perks:
    / @spaceflightnowvideo

Комментарии • 34

  • @thesquirrel914
    @thesquirrel914 Месяц назад +2

    RL-10 first flew in 1962, and still holds the record for specific impulse to this day.

  • @gregsmith1116
    @gregsmith1116 9 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you WRS for a great report on a historically important rocket engine! I am not even a Aerojet engineer or employee! Just a space nut!

  • @afterburner119
    @afterburner119 9 месяцев назад +2

    I know two of the guys @ 0:36 & 1:20 😂. Thats the West Palm Beach facility. It will always known to be a Pratt RL-10 (PW LSP). I stayed on the Pratt side during the split.

    • @mikem9572
      @mikem9572 9 месяцев назад

      I worked in test and assy..the guys working on the engines in the video weren't any mechanics.. just engineers.. just the guys in the control room are test mechanics..

  • @aw_dev
    @aw_dev 8 месяцев назад

    The gigantic "REMOVE BEFORE FLIGHT" tag is hilarious!

  • @Stuff_And_Things
    @Stuff_And_Things 9 месяцев назад +1

    1:35 I can't believe NASA has allied with the Daleks!

  • @steveo6034
    @steveo6034 9 месяцев назад

    Wow excellent editing, thought I was watching a CNBC special on the RL-10! Excellent work Spaceflight Now🚀🛰️

  • @glencrandall7051
    @glencrandall7051 9 месяцев назад

    Thank you for sharing.🙂🙂

  • @patrickehaynes
    @patrickehaynes 9 месяцев назад

    Good morning ✨️

  • @donnymcgahan1158
    @donnymcgahan1158 9 месяцев назад

    I want one

    • @benzene_sandwich
      @benzene_sandwich 2 месяца назад

      Ask to borrow one i'm sure they will let you have it.

  • @Atipat12
    @Atipat12 9 месяцев назад

    🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @joeshmoe4671
    @joeshmoe4671 7 месяцев назад +1

    These rookies will be fking around for another 2 years while SpaceX will be orbiting the moon by then.

    • @alesh2275
      @alesh2275 Месяц назад

      August 8, 2024 now.
      SpaceX isn’t orbiting the moon yet, but you were right: these rookies are still fking around while 2 NASA astronauts are stranded on the ISS ….

  • @sagitarius1591
    @sagitarius1591 9 месяцев назад

  • @hilwaamanamankiyar-pp5bf
    @hilwaamanamankiyar-pp5bf Месяц назад

    RL

  • @beverlyalton432
    @beverlyalton432 9 месяцев назад

    👍

  • @jasons44
    @jasons44 5 дней назад

    Look at all the flanges and it's all non-reusable😢

  • @Atipat12
    @Atipat12 9 месяцев назад

    😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮

  • @billscott1601
    @billscott1601 9 месяцев назад +1

    Aerojet is probably years behind SpaceX in engine development.

    • @steveo6034
      @steveo6034 9 месяцев назад

      No one can touch SpaceX in development, they are just too hardware rich and move way too fast. Relativity and Stoke Space look promising as well as Firefly. ULA is about to be sold to Blue Origin.

    • @mikem9572
      @mikem9572 9 месяцев назад +1

      I recently just left Aerojet.. built many models of the RL10 over the years.. its the same engine that was built in 1950..just a few changes..
      This engine here we had so many problems with leaks around the turbo pump..it was embarrassing when the customer was watching our test runs and it would catch on fire. Ya space X is way ahead..

    • @ericmatthews8497
      @ericmatthews8497 9 месяцев назад +1

      Umm.. The RL-10 has efficiency (known as Specific Impulse) that vastly out classes anything SpaceX has made thus far. Liquid Hydrogen is just a more energetic propellent. The RL-10 engine is responsible for almost ALL of the deep space exploration The United States has done thus far. So there you have it... You are just f***ing wrong.

    • @benzene_sandwich
      @benzene_sandwich 2 месяца назад

      @@mikem9572 If you really worked for areojet you would know that the RL-10 is miles ahead of the merlin vac in terms of efficiency and reliability.

    • @acefighterpilot
      @acefighterpilot Месяц назад

      Space is a funny industry. On one hand you have seventy years of reliable service and continuous improvement, and on the other you have a pile of scrap at the bottom of the Indian Ocean. Somehow the scrap is more advanced.

  • @michaeldomansky8497
    @michaeldomansky8497 9 месяцев назад +1

    Antique technology …… No creative genius ….

    • @benzene_sandwich
      @benzene_sandwich 2 месяца назад +1

      The RL-10 is a very good engine, why fix what isnt broken. Better to focus on things that really need improvment.

    • @michaeldomansky8497
      @michaeldomansky8497 2 месяца назад

      @@benzene_sandwich so it was a Ford model T

    • @benzene_sandwich
      @benzene_sandwich 2 месяца назад +1

      @@michaeldomansky8497 You misunderstand, the RL-10 is still the cutting edge of technology. You may say "it was made in the 50's" However, it has been upgraded numerous times to the point that nothing from the original engine remains. It is now 3-d printed, something even spacex doesnt do for merlin or raptor that i know of, and uses advanced inconel turbines, some of the highest grade ever built. Like it or not, the R-10 will be in service for many years to come. That being said, i agree that SpaceX's engines are also extremely advanced.

    • @thesquirrel914
      @thesquirrel914 Месяц назад +2

      RL-10 first flew in 1963, and still holds the record for Specific Impulse to this day.

    • @benzene_sandwich
      @benzene_sandwich Месяц назад

      @@thesquirrel914 setting aside werid tripopellant engines, yeah.