I adore this artist's work, it is bright and cheerful, it sings along with the music (Bach!) it is fresh and I could study it all day. I love the colours, the brush stokes, the compositions, I love how this work lifts my spirits and makes me feel happy. Each and every one on this video is a gem. I could go on for ages, but i hope Laurence sees my comments and approves!!! I am an artist, and I am inspired by the beauty I see in them all.
This channel is superb. I really do not know why more people do not subscribe or watch. A vast repertoire of artists with massively different styles. And always sympathetic music to accompany the work. Bravo Aurelio. Another interesting artist and their works. And thank you from UK.
These paintings are amazingly powerful and beautiful. What strikes me about abstract figurative painting is that in the hand of a master it seems to capture the magical essence of "reality" better than so- called "realism".
A much greater diversity than it seems at first glance. Completely non-figurative paintings (with “code” indications or with - more sparingly - titles - for example the “Energy” series). What could be a problem with some untitled non-figurative works ? The “interpretation” is “in the famous eye of the beholder”: you experience such paintings, or you look for recognizable features in them. In “B339” - upside down - it reads “important” (and another word that I cannot decipher) - do I see a stylized bull's head or is it there because I want to see it in this work ? The “sequel”, “B340”, is - also for the “seeker of recognisability” - completely non-figurative. Then actually “B339” too ? In some paintings something can be seen as “beach scenes” with sea water, sandbanks and sea skies (“A 395”, “Go Live there”, “Look at my world”) - is that intended or is it "sought and found" ? Possibly intended that way, because the series “The tree of life” repeatedly portrays a stylized tree. Also in “Far from here” two tiny trees can be discovered (in a kind of “desert”). In the series “Flights” flowers - which may or may not be highly abstracted - fly. In “B420”: small houses on a rock ? Thus: very diverse work. Sometimes you just have to experience her non-figurative work. Sometimes it leads - for some people - to “searching in it” (and therefore possible finding). Then again there is so much “realism” in the painting that searching is no longer necessary. Influences such as Richter (2X) and Rothko are explicitly mentioned. But in her most recent paintings there are also reminiscences of certain works by De Staël (the "Souvenir" series). My appreciation for the choice of music. As a small child, the “Brandenburg Concertos” and the “Suites” were the first compositions by Johann Sebastian Bach that I could “understand”. The indestructible basis of my musical taste.
I adore this artist's work, it is bright and cheerful, it sings along with the music (Bach!) it is fresh and I could study it all day. I love the colours, the brush stokes, the compositions, I love how this work lifts my spirits and makes me feel happy. Each and every one on this video is a gem. I could go on for ages, but i hope Laurence sees my comments and approves!!! I am an artist, and I am inspired by the beauty I see in them all.
This channel is superb. I really do not know why more people do not subscribe or watch. A vast repertoire of artists with massively different styles. And always sympathetic music to accompany the work. Bravo Aurelio. Another interesting artist and their works. And thank you from UK.
Absolutely agree, and another Thank You from the UK ❤
These paintings are amazingly powerful and beautiful. What strikes me about abstract figurative painting is that in the hand of a master it seems to capture the magical essence of "reality" better than so- called "realism".
💙
A much greater diversity than it seems at first glance. Completely non-figurative paintings (with “code” indications or with - more sparingly - titles - for example the “Energy” series).
What could be a problem with some untitled non-figurative works ? The “interpretation” is “in the famous eye of the beholder”: you experience such paintings, or you look for recognizable features in them.
In “B339” - upside down - it reads “important” (and another word that I cannot decipher) - do I see a stylized bull's head or is it there because I want to see it in this work ?
The “sequel”, “B340”, is - also for the “seeker of recognisability” - completely non-figurative. Then actually “B339” too ?
In some paintings something can be seen as “beach scenes” with sea water, sandbanks and sea skies (“A 395”, “Go Live there”, “Look at my world”) - is that intended or is it "sought and found" ?
Possibly intended that way, because the series “The tree of life” repeatedly portrays a stylized tree. Also in “Far from here” two tiny trees can be discovered (in a kind of “desert”). In the series “Flights” flowers - which may or may not be highly abstracted - fly. In “B420”: small houses on a rock ?
Thus: very diverse work. Sometimes you just have to experience her non-figurative work. Sometimes it leads - for some people - to “searching in it” (and therefore possible finding). Then again there is so much “realism” in the painting that searching is no longer necessary.
Influences such as Richter (2X) and Rothko are explicitly mentioned. But in her most recent paintings there are also reminiscences of certain works by De Staël (the "Souvenir" series).
My appreciation for the choice of music. As a small child, the “Brandenburg Concertos” and the “Suites” were the first compositions by Johann Sebastian Bach that I could “understand”.
The indestructible basis of my musical taste.