I know a lot of people won’t remember this. But I remember when Sophie Blake did an advert for Onken in the early 2000s and she was a fox with a very seductive laugh. I have the advert on my RUclips channel as it turns out.
This is absolutely disgusting! Perhaps do away with multiple 'diversity managers' earning £100,00 a year and give patients the life-saving drugs they need.
Yes, they made a mistake, it’s all a learning curve. No government has ever been through a pandemic like that before. Don’t forget the vaccine saved millions of lives.
the best way to sort a problem like beast cancer is to make more money become a television personality and then consolt a private doctor who will prescribe you with drugs to remind you of whats important in real life .
No, as I said to Sophie cancer research raised 719 million pounds last year. That money should go towards funding new drugs to save and extend lives. Where’s the money going to then?
@@Annomous-58 I don’t know why you’re so upset about my comment. Instead of it being £10k a month for everyone, it would be a certain % of their earnings.. then the drug is accessible to everyone and not just the elite few that can afford £10k a month. You’re clearly scared of your savings getting taken from you, but don’t worry Sue, it’s just a hypothetical idea x
Sophie fyi cancer research raised last year 719 million pounds. This money is to pay for new drugs to beat cancer. I have paid thousands over the years in national insurance and tax and should not have to pay anything more to fund my treatment if I were to unfortunately get cancer. I’m retired so with your idea of a percentage from what salary? Nobody needs to pay anything. That’s the sort idea Labour would come up with.
@@Annomous-58 oh that explains it, you’re a tory. Well, I’m not a politician but if my amazingly smart idea would take place then I wouldn’t expect retired people to pay. Of course the drug should be free for everyone.. but the drug companies are the ones holding an extremely expensive pay threshold over everyone’s necks. My point being, if the drug company did a % instead, they’d make more money because more people would have access to pay. It’s quite straight forward to understand really.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
THIS IS ABSOLUTELY DISGRACEFUL EVERYONE HAS THE RIGHT TO TREATMENT 😢
Hearing the words "not cost effective" boiled my p**s when there is a drug that could extend someone's life 😢
I know a lot of people won’t remember this. But I remember when Sophie Blake did an advert for Onken in the early 2000s and she was a fox with a very seductive laugh. I have the advert on my RUclips channel as it turns out.
No words 💔
So sad 😔❤️❤️
Be strong ladies and keep fighting for this life saving drug. We are all behind you . Keep up the good work ❤
Give the patient's the life saving drugs . I wish this lady all the best ❤
This is absolutely disgusting! Perhaps do away with multiple 'diversity managers' earning £100,00 a year and give patients the life-saving drugs they need.
What has diversity managers earning 100k got to do with this? Just focus on the topic. Patients should be given access to the life saving drugs.
I wish they would put the name of the drug on the screen!
When you see how much money was wasted on useless PPE equipment during lockdowns and hear this……Thinking of those affected.
Yes, they made a mistake, it’s all a learning curve. No government has ever been through a pandemic like that before. Don’t forget the vaccine saved millions of lives.
the best way to sort a problem like beast cancer is to make more money become a television personality and then consolt a private doctor who will prescribe you with drugs to remind you of whats important in real life .
if you pay tax you should get endless treatment... if you dont pay tax you should be at the back of the queue
No, as I said to Sophie cancer research raised 719 million pounds last year. That money should go towards funding new drugs to save and extend lives. Where’s the money going to then?
as a celebrity are you under what overs you ?
this medicine should be means tested, surely the drug companies would make more money as then more people would be using it 🤷♀️
Means tested? Ridiculous. You’re saying people with savings have to pay? They have paid in tax already when they worked or are working.
@@Annomous-58 I don’t know why you’re so upset about my comment. Instead of it being £10k a month for everyone, it would be a certain % of their earnings.. then the drug is accessible to everyone and not just the elite few that can afford £10k a month. You’re clearly scared of your savings getting taken from you, but don’t worry Sue, it’s just a hypothetical idea x
Sophie fyi cancer research raised last year 719 million pounds. This money is to pay for new drugs to beat cancer. I have paid thousands over the years in national insurance and tax and should not have to pay anything more to fund my treatment if I were to unfortunately get cancer. I’m retired so with your idea of a percentage from what salary? Nobody needs to pay anything. That’s the sort idea Labour would come up with.
@@Annomous-58 oh that explains it, you’re a tory. Well, I’m not a politician but if my amazingly smart idea would take place then I wouldn’t expect retired people to pay. Of course the drug should be free for everyone.. but the drug companies are the ones holding an extremely expensive pay threshold over everyone’s necks. My point being, if the drug company did a % instead, they’d make more money because more people would have access to pay. It’s quite straight forward to understand really.
@@rawrsophiex no definitely not a Tory anymore. End of conversation
Always pushing drugs
What do you suggest then?
antinatalism