"What Is The Government Not Telling Us?" - Eric Weinstein On UFOs
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 июн 2024
- Chris and Eric Weinstein discuss the latest information leaks on UFOs. What does Eric Weinstein think the UFO phenomenon is? Why does Eric Weinstein believe there is more than what is being told to the public? Has the United States lost control of its airspace according to Eric Weinstein?
Get a Free Sample Pack of all LMNT Flavours with your first box at www.drinklmnt.com/modernwisdom (automatically applied at checkout)
Get access to every episode 10 hours before RUclips by subscribing for free on Spotify - spoti.fi/2LSimPn or Apple Podcasts - apple.co/2MNqIgw
Get my free Reading List of 100 life-changing books here - chriswillx.com/books/
Try my productivity energy drink Neutonic here - neutonic.com/modernwisdom
-
Get in touch in the comments below or head to...
Instagram: / chriswillx
Twitter: / chriswillx
Email: chriswillx.com/contact/
Hello you savages. Watch the full episode with Eric here: ruclips.net/video/p_swB_KS8Hw/видео.html! Get a Free Sample Pack of all LMNT Flavours with your first box at www.drinklmnt.com/modernwisdom
Bret on Rogan
Eric on Williamson
I'm a simple man. I see Weinstein bros, I watch.
Try listening without looking. Its the message. Not the messenger
could this form of mankind accept the melancholy of knowing its existence will never escape the solar system? nope
Perhaps they are much closer to Earth than we think, like within our Solar System.
I'm glad your comment was the first one I saw because i was going to say the exact same thing. Thank you!
Eric has such a brilliant way of taking complex ideas and making them exponentially more confusing and vague
Got me in the first half
This really made me laugh, thanks. 😂
He isolates himself and calls it cool. These people try to create a new genre of their own league of cool: those that don’t know what he does. But it’s limiting and exclusionary which is what he didn’t want to be earlier in life as an outcast. It’s a funny dry a if watching these people exclude them elves. But hey, you’re an adult. Have at it
I don't agree but this made me laugh 😂
Also, his pauses in conversation make me and I imagine the interviewer uncomfortable.😂
"An idiot admires complexity, a genius admires simplicity"
Terry Davis
Truer words...
Sounds good at first, but is nonsense after all tbh.
thanks! this guy is such a bs artist. degree means nothing i guess.
True that, A Genius can reduce a complicated equation and reduce it down to its simplest terms
@@drd1924 Feynman, by contrast.
Sorry Eric - in January 1968 at approximately 6:00 p.m. I (a young police officer - off duty), along with my neighbour (a reporter for a large newspaper) witnessed for over 20 minutes a massive triangular craft (about the size of a football stadium) that glided almost silently over our residential homes situated on the outskirts of a large Canadian city. It was not an aircraft. It stopped for periods of time, made right angle turns, and had three lights (red, yellowish and green). It moved southward across a barren field and hovered over major hydro power lines. Then this craft was joined by five other smaller craft. A few seconds later they accelerated away and completely disappeared. I wrote an official police report when I returned to duty. My neighbour's employer (the large newspaper company) would not allow him to write about what he witnessed. You can't explain away what we saw. Was it an alien craft? Quite possibly. Could it have been a secret caft of US or Russian origin? Possibly, but highly unlikely.
With all due respect to you as a police officer, Eric is saying that he does not believe in "shiny metal aircrafts" as ordinary aircrafts: you are saying it. It could have been an unknown energy.
@@RicardoMartinez-oh9sq "aircraft" The are no "aircrafts".
Thats the TR-3B plane program. Like the F117 was back in the day, its a new militairy aircraft....im not even surprised or interested in that anymore....this is just a human craft.
@@joostonline5146 Ah yes!! The football-field silent hovering anniversary edition. With many guest appearances in rural areas (despite being military and super secret) all over the world, also the Phoenix Lights special guest. Make no mistake, it's JuSt a huMan AirCRafT!!!
@@Adiaf8orosHow do u really know that?
Eric has such an entertaining way of demonstrating his narcism and dunning Kruger bias. What a great Ego!
He is the smartest man in the world according to himself
Neil DeGrasse Tyson’s not too different.
💯
It's becoming less entertaining at an accelerating rate.
@@Tim21189.... I hate to say it..... But he's actually more like Eric Dyson...... A purveyor of word salad. Niel is a giggler and an obvious shill. He rudely pushes into his host but he doesn't talk over the heads of the audience. This guy constantly, casually throws in specialized language without explaining it's meaning in a very rude and condescending way. Tyson and Wienstien are different types of Snobs.
"There are organisations that you cannot Google"....what a chilling statement
How about "Google has altered search results during an unknown amount of election cycles"? Because we know it was done in 2016 and beyond, and we know that in 2024 Google's new AI accidentally revealed that they alter your input query with algorithm filters before executing an action.
What you hadn’t assumed there were secret societies before this? 😂
Both the United States and the Soviet had secret research proving that telepathy is real albeit an unreliable communication method.
Epstein is one such organizations and it looks like PDiddy is also and maybe just another head of the same.
This isn't even slightly controversial. I could name some of them.
I think most of us have been in a business meeting with an "Eric". He talks and talks, and agrees then disagrees, he thinks he's smarter than everyone else and has the snarky sarcasm to prove it, and then he talks some more about things that seem to be vaguely relevant but are actually not, then everyone walks out of the meeting with absolutely nothing accomplished.
Loool
Right, pure arrogance…..
Hey you were at that meeting too then
@@artsmart Ho it was you ?
😂😂😂
“Eric, shall I put your coffee on the table?” Eric: “Can you even describe the forces between the particles that constitute a table? Or coffee? You are not qualified to ask me this question”.
Also Eric "I love myself so much"
I watched this whole interview, and what you don't see in the clip is the host left to take a dump at the 18 minute mark and when he came back four and a half hours later, Eric was still talking. Yeah, it was a long dump.
Hahahaha perfect🤦♂️
Oldest trick in the IDW; anytime you are asked a question you either can't or would really rather not answer, or need to boost your ego by making yourself seem smarter than your conversational partner, either forget what words like "believe", "fact", "real" etc mean and claim that no one knows what they mean (think Jordan Peterson here), or throw out some obscure theory (that more often than not is tangentially related at best) or really dense literature that the listener simply must be expert in to even be able to talk to you on subject (Eric but the whole crew uses it). Makes the whole thing seem a little tedious to those that aren't over-wowed by multi-syllable words and a fast cadence (or in Ben's case, extra-extra fast).
@@Kube_Dog om my god Im gonna die from laughing so hard
I think Eric has a combination of arrogance + ignorance. Because of course there is proof. They have admitted that they have recovered craft.
That's not proof. I can admit that I won the lotery. Does that make me a millionarie?
who has.. who is they? i admitted to winning the lottery doesn't mean I actually did
When ego limits possibility nothing can be learned.
💯
and adversely, if what's leaned is rigid, it limits ego. Which is a good thing.
@@PLF... Yeah but ego always finds a way!
Confucius say, man who goes to bed with itchy butt, wakes up with smelly finger.
@@Steven-lb4bl Tale as old as time.
These guys are geniuses in their own minds.
Whilst I'm just a legend in my own lunchbox.
I dont think Chris thinks hes a genius but Eric can be obnoxious and pretentious af.
Well put,. I guess I figure that if the interviewer can't call Eric out at least a little bit. But Eric seems to draws lots of views. From the comments, people are gobbling his drivel.
But, "if you don't know what a Riemmanian manifold is..." why am I talking to you? Ha ha Impressive term that manifold thing. To say one cannot comment on space aliens without knowing that term is hilarious. (I do know what one is BTW) but why is he saying that? 🙂@@podunkest
Yes, In their minds
ufo cultist
Such is the delivery that once my computer actually froze, it took me a while to notice.
lol. Eric's delivery is driving me nuts.
Your comment is truly hilarious. Thanks for the laugh...
😂😂😂
Every time I listen to him, I notice my attention can be charted as an inverse parabola that starts very high then rapidly drops down over the time axis to near zero without actually hitting zero.
I think he is saying..look this is a physics issue, so ask physics related questions..he is looking for the scientific version of the answer
Something I've just noticed about Chris' interviews is that he is comfortable with the silence. That's the mark of a skillful interviewer. It takes balls to sit with the space like that.
Your observation is very intelligent, too.
Welcome to Finland. Silent nation
or perhaps… he doesn’t know what kind of question to ask 😂😂😂
@@sg1678 🤣🤣
It takes balls to sit with the space like that? You mean he must have huge bollocks for not talking all the time? How odd. I guess you must really like huge balls but just sitting there not saying anything to him about it?
Glad to see Eric humble himself on this subject. It was frustrating watching him dismiss this back in 2021.
Eric, humbling himself. That's a first
he wasn't humble at all. He' saying that only people like him can talk about UFO's because they understand some magical physics terms
@@blitzme99 He always does that
@@AncientMysteriesAndInnovations well he's not really wrong. If you aren't well versed in physics good luck trying to explain anything that's even remotely connected to reality.
@@fVNzO yeah, there is definitely some truth to that, but that also means he's a poor science communicator if the layperson isn't qualified to hear his thoughts. I do like Eric, but he has that tendency
In 1973, when I was a little girl, my family and I had a close encounter with a craft ... this happened just after dusk and this object first appeared as a light in the distance that looked like an airplane. It then began moving around in a way that our known aircraft do not... it began moving faster and the word I would use to describe the way it moved is "mercurial". At one point it moved swiftly across the sky and then slowed down, came to a stop, then took off in the opposite direction. I was in the car with my parents and little sister. My dad, who was driving, took notice and began following it ... rather quickly, we became closer to it as it became closer to us. My dad pulled the car off of the road to sit and watch ... next thing we knew it was hovering over the top of our car ... it was making no sound, blowing no wind.
As I experienced this, I was not thinking "UFO" (again, this was 1973 and I was just a little girl)... I was just wondering what it was. There is a very strange feeling that that one gets when one encounters something so anomalous - that it does not exist in one's known world.
My little girl mind was trying to put a label on it ... "Well, it is hanging in the air but it is not a helicopter... because they make a lot of noise and blow a lot of wind."
It hovered for a few minutes, at tree-top level, then, according to my mother, it took off at a 45 degree angle.
I did not see it take off because, by that point, I was terrified and hiding in the back seat. I was scared.
I have no idea what it was. It did seem like it moved in such a way as to purposely attract our attention. It seemed like it knew when we had spotted it and, from there, it seemed that it anticipated our responses.
But I have no idea what it was. I guess the Occam's Razor explanation might be that it was an experimental, high-tech drone (human technology) that was being used to perform psychological experiments on folks in the 1970s... to see how they would respond to seeing unexpected, unexplainable (and potentially, frightening) aerial craft ????
There are so many ways to look at this phenomenon ... we need to be both rational and open-minded. Lest we have a new religion form from all of this... and I would not be shocked to find that this might have been part of its purpose. But I do not know! It's a mystery to me.
New religious fanaticism has already emerged with those who believe the human race was created by aliens, so there’s that.
Thanks for that. I witnessed something similar to your description along with several other people, I can’t explain what it was. I know it was real. Just waiting for a rational explanation.
Some people have similar experiences but would classify them more like "paranormal". In the end, whether we humans call what we see "alien", "ufo", "ghost", "demon", "poltergeist", "orb" or what-now, the same set of beings is behind that "vision".
They are "spirit beings", variously referred to as "angels", "demons", and "sons of god" in the Bible. Some of these had previously been disobedient. 2. Peter 2:19, 20 talks about "spirits in prison, who had formerly been disobedient ... in Noah’s day, while the ark was being constructed". These disobedient spirits are the ones referred to as "sons of God" in the narrative leading to the global flood in Genesis 6:1-4. The flood forced them to return to the spirit realm where they have allied themselves with Satan to mislead the entire inhabited earth. So people often have "religious sentiments" in connection with these sort of sights, but they are not from God.
Clearly you witnessed an extraterrestrial spacecraft. There will be people that tell you otherwise. Don't let them.
@@mb1287t It definitely was, or they were, as there were several of them. I knew there was no man made aircraft or space craft that could travel at that speed or manoeuvre as they did. We were crossing the pacific, still a few days out from land, guys on watch gathered up anyone they could find to witness what they were seeing. We watched the display for maybe 30 minutes. It left me feeling quite humble. Strangely no one talked about it afterwards.
Eric is tired of Neil deGrasse Tyson being the King of BS. He wants a piece of that action.
Spot on
I don't know tyson ain't full of shit like this guy.
Great point indeed! Weinstein has not been laid in 30 years - no matter he is full of it. Arrogant beyond compare!
Basically 99.999999% of us have absolutely no idea whats going on and the phenomena of ETs is so unimaginably complex our tiny minds just cant comprehend it .
Admitting you don't know is part of the path to discovery of truth. Thanks Eric for not pretending to know.
That’s not what he said, that’s what he wants the ‘lessers’ to belive he said. He just didn’t make a line in the sand, but he has one
@@hoopslaa5235he literally admitted he doesn’t know several times, try harder
I think that is an excellent point. Part of me thinks that the underlying problem here is just that. For example, say a US B-29 bomber crashed on a remote island in the Pacific in 1945, (and the crew bailed out before it hit) that had no knowledge of airplanes. But a few of the islanders had seen planes these fly over, with lots of different theories on what they were. Now, they have one of these crashed B-29's and they decide they are going to figure it out and build one of their own. What would be their odds of even understanding how the thing worked, much less reverse engineering a B29, on this island, without help from another country? And, could you not see every argument being made on that island, being made today about UFO's, being made back then? Huu: "This craft has to be from an advanced civilization." Slag: "If they are so advanced, why did the thing crash?" Even worse, think about the arguments on the islands who saw it fly over, but who don't have a crashed plane. Jut: "I'm telling you all, you just saw a big bird. And, the rumors that the island next door has one on their beach and it's not a bird, is crazy talk." They would have no frame of reference to even intelligently discuss what they were seeing and hearing about.
The Mark of Intelligence. Trump will never say he doesn't know.
The comments section proves bro podcasting speaks to the male equivalent of Oprahs brain dead audience
I love listening to Eric on this subject. Everyone else either talks about what they think they know or what they strongly believe. He is basically just like "This whole thing is weird. I have no idea what's happening. But it's intriguing and I want to know more". Which is basically where I am with it.
And it's a lame, thoughtless and ego centric way to look at things.
@@sicknado It's thoughtless and lame to admit you don't know what's happening and that you want more data? Are you 12?
@@recursivefunk Your lame because you don't even trust yourself enough to take a logical and obvious stance. Yes, thats thoughtless. Literally
@@sicknado Actually, the biggest advances in human history were made when we stopped trusting our own beliefs and started gathering data from the environment that challenged out thoughts. When you confront data (not beliefs) you grow. When you assume your beliefs are data, you become a weak delirious little person.
This
What a long winded way to say, “Damn, they must be using different physics”
Lol It's almost as if he really did not want to say that.
I met two aliens in 1984, a female on July 20, three months after a blond male who floated forward instead of walking like we do. Me, a friend and my 2 children were with me too. The Aliens from out there, would never harm us. They see us as family.❣Greetings from sweden
I have analyzed what Eric said in this clip using the technique described in Isaac Asimov's Foundation Series. I succeeded in eliminating meaningless statements, vague gibberish, useless qualifications-in short all the goo and dribble-and found there was nothing left. Everything canceled out. In this clip, Eric didn't say one damned thing.
Try using your own brain next time and you might get something.
@@bikerboy3k My comment obviously went right over your head. Have a good day Brainiac!
@@wolfgangamadeus1246 Jesus Christ...
Eric is is a powerful breath of air…..air being necessary to exist….keep breathing friend…..we need millions more of him…
I read about this in a book by Nick Cook, "The Hunt for Zero Piont" (2001). He was an investigative reporter from England that followed the trail back from the top secret Aurora project, to the stealth technology, and the 70s deep "Black Project" research into antigravity based on Nazi experiments of the 1940s. He interviewed ex-NASA employees, members of the military, airforce, German and Russian scientists, etc. Fascinating stuff. It really leaves you with the thought of how far they might of progressed in the last 20+ years. 👍🏼
UFO or uap are ultra top secret projects! Aliens topic is just a distraction to hide their stuff! People don't realize that you can search on Google that the first flying saucer was human made by Russia. People are blindfolded
read Annie Jacobsons books.
Eric’s dramatic pauses make me want to tear my hair out lol
listen at 2x and they are less problematic.
It’s literally just awkward gaps in the conversation due to him not even being able to talk like a normal person.
imo he’s perfectly capable of talking like a normal person but he says things like “no, I’m being serious” and “you think I’m joking?” and pauses like that bc it makes him feel like he’s forcing the other person to wait on his every word and take him super seriously
It's called "thinking".
More people should try it.
Isn't that what you "American"-speaking fellas call "double take" :v ?
Bro said he spoke to 4 million people 😂😂
That was weird!
And he said it with a straight face. It would have been different if he said his podcast reaches 4 million people or he's taught that many, but actually 'talking to' is ludicrous. He was so arrogant.
He speaks like he had figured it all out but he hasnt
@@mattkevlarlarock5469 He clearly exaggerated to get his point across better. You can't possibly think he actually meant that literally?
his tone of voice with no hint of a smile showed me he was serious. he's unbelievably arrogant.@@kresimirpleic
He waffles alot about nothing
He's waffley versatile.
They both do. And he's theatrical when he speaks. And pompous. I wouldnt trust him anymore than Epstien.
@@robambrose4199 🐦 👁️ 🥔 🧇
@@LilacWolfArt The brainwashing was a success lol.
@@LilacWolfArt Thanks for teaching me Egyptian. I didn't realise I could read it until just now !
The bigger question is if Eric's hair is a wig
"Extraterrestrial Scapegoat" would be an awesome prog. metalcore band name, lol.
Sounds techdeath to me. Most likely instrumental.
I know right, it’s sexy, isn’t it? There was some X-Files episodes that played in this possibility being the real conspiracy
the Americans made up the Russians just to scare the Chinese... etc
Shorten it to Exscape :)
should really be "Extraterrestrial Space Goats"
I’d love to see a conversation between Diana Pasulka and Eric. She’s been in contact with everyone from the Vatican to numerous high level people within NASA, the CIA, and other governmental programs from the US and other similar programs in other countries who have told her and shown her quite a few startling things. She’s also met and had numerous conversations with some of the most compelling and credible experiencers out there. She comes at the subject from a very different angle and it would just be interesting to see what could come of a conversation between them. Numerous people have explained that a big part of the issue surrounding disclosure is that not only is the topic heavily compartmentalized, the protocols that have built up around the entire thing in all the different departments makes it all but impossible for anyone to say anything definitive. It’s a knot that needs undoing for sure.
Because UFO evidence is vast and most people like Eric don't care about the subject so they aren't aware of it's history and evidence. If someone is actually interested in finding out what a UFO is, there is a ridiculous amount of evidence and stories to follow. People just aren't aware because they don't care. Most people aren't even aware that flying saucers appeared over the white house 2 weekends in a row in 1952 causing an airforce response, freaked out all the radar men and soldiers. They haven't heard the bast amount of stories from soldiers throughout history seeing things behind closed doors they shouldn't have. They dismiss the stories of soldiers who come right out and say I saw a flying saucer. They dismiss the hundreds of radar men and airforce pilots that constantly see and track craft on radar with no explanation, with technology that would change our world forever if it was public. Even if you think UFO's are man made. Just the technology alone would completely change our way of life. To fly and operate how they do you need sciences way beyond where we are at now, and if they are hiding some of those, like gravitational flight, they could literally upend our world of travel in one night. Eric thinks he has a valid opinion because he feels he's smart and intelligent in a few different areas, so he feels his opinion about UFO's carries weight and importance. "IF Eric says it's weird and doesn't think they are alien," Then he must be right because he's very smart.
There is no knot! UFO or uap are ultra top secret military projects. Nothing to see here
When he says , “this is the only topic I’ve ever met where I can’t generate a single explanation for what the hells going on.” That was Powerful
Imagine a trampoline stretched over a bumpy landscape. That bumpy landscape, in the world of math, is called a Riemann manifold. It's like a curvy sheet that can bend and twist in different ways.
Now, imagine bouncing a small ball on this trampoline. As the ball rolls around, it feels different forces depending on the bumps and dips it encounters. That's kind of like a determinant line bundle. It helps us track how these forces change as the ball moves across the bumpy Riemann manifold.
So, to put it simply:
* Riemann manifold: A bumpy, curved mathematical landscape.
* Determinant line bundle: A way to track how things change on that bumpy landscape.
Basics
You might be allowed to ask questions about aliens.
Why? Because Eric does allow it xD
Witnessing two flying saucers in 1965 at a young age, I had a very natural instinct that they're not human. What they could do and where they did it was totally off the charts from what humans do with flying crafts that are made. Humans don't do test flights in flying saucers over neighborhood roads and towns as test or practice. You're in for the shock of your life, no way they're human.
Funny how when everyone got a high quality camera in their pocket all of these tall tales of UFOs and Bigfoot disappeared
@@garythecyclingnerd6219 are you serious? There's more "Bigfoot" videos on RUclips than ever before. It's a hot market right now.
I'm not disagreeing with you or saying you're wrong, but ufo and "sasquatch" videos (and tales) have gone up, not down.
Guy, you seriously are talking out of your ass. They quite literally can’t be anything except humans, as they’ve only ever been seen here, and we’re the only species with vehicles here. It’s not rocket science dude don’t be so gullible. If there’s even a possibility of aliens, which there is %0 as earth is literally the only thing that exists, then it’s just as likely to be fairies from a magic forest. Both have the same amount of evidence
@garythecyclingnerd6219 high quality cameras? What are you smoking? The cameras everyone has on their phones are great at up close high resolution pictures. They are absolute garbage at taking photos of things twenty to thirty thousand feet in the air and often in low light conditions.
Maybe your smoke is better. lol in 1965 we didn't have cellphones and most people didn't carry cameras around in their pocket.@@tennesseeheckler3014
So it looks like "Riemannian manifold" and "Determinate Line Bundle" are Differential Geometry jibber jabber likely used in this context in regards to Space Time and the bending of it. For those who cared not to wiki his odd fucking pretext to his monologue.
Thankyou. He really is incredibly arrogant.
Butthurt string theorists 😂
If communicating technical topics to the layperson is an art form, which I think it is. Eric's painting with his toes.
He knows there are secrets and he knows we don't know what they are. Furthermore, we are stupid. Giggle giggle.
Phhht.
@@tobystewart4403- agree.
A Riemannian manifold is a mathematical concept used primarily in the fields of geometry and physics. It's a type of manifold equipped with a smooth inner product on the tangent space at each point that varies smoothly from point to point. This inner product is known as a Riemannian metric. To break it down:
Manifold: At its core, a manifold is a space that might be curved but locally resembles Euclidean space (the flat space of classical geometry). This means that around every point, there's a neighborhood that looks like a chunk of ordinary
n-dimensional space. This allows for the generalization of concepts like curves, surfaces, and volumes.
Tangent Space: At each point on a manifold, you can imagine a tangent space. This is a vector space that consists of all the possible directions in which one can tangentially pass through that point. It's like looking at the manifold through a zoomed-in lens, where it appears flat, and you can define vectors in this flat space.
Riemannian Metric: This is a smoothly varying positive-definite inner product on the tangent spaces. It allows for the measurement of lengths of curves, angles between vectors, and areas (or volumes) on the manifold. Essentially, it provides a way to do calculus on the manifold, enabling one to discuss concepts like distance, volume, curvature, and geometry in a generalized, curved space.
Curvature: One of the most crucial aspects of Riemannian manifolds is their curvature, which can be understood through the Riemannian metric. The curvature is a measure of how much the manifold bends or deviates from being flat. It is a key concept in understanding the manifold's geometric properties and has profound implications in physics, particularly in the general theory of relativity, where the curvature of spacetime affects the motion of objects.
In summary, a Riemannian manifold generalizes curved surfaces to higher dimensions and provides a framework for exploring the geometry and topology of these spaces. It's a foundational concept in modern geometry and theoretical physics, particularly in the study of gravitational fields, where spacetime is modeled as a Riemannian manifold.
I always enjoy Eric's input - the combination of his common sense and creativity is refreshing.
Here here. This NEEDS to be more talked about, and Chris needs more people on actually discussing it the whole episode
This guy talks %100 nonsense and doesn’t even try to theorize. He’s worthless
Have you ever checked out Dark Journalist?
Nothing like an interview with someone who says he knows nothing. 🙄
one of the few actually intelligent humans........everything you KNOW is wrong
What I don't get how can you sit there with a straight face and lie to the people who are only trying to do good the truth will have its day💯👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻🙏🙏🙏
A wise man knows that he knows nothing.
@@pistol0grip0pump A wise man who admits he knows nothing... does not agree to an interview. 🤔🙄
@@shannonhenson609 That's absolutely true and applicable for those who believe there's nothing to be learned or gained from said wise man.
Thankfully I am not one of those people.
3 cases which cannot be explained:
1) Ruwa, Zimbabwe 1994 - Ariel School Ufo
2) Australia 1966 - Westhall School Ufos
3) Rendlesham Forest Military Base Ufos - 1980
"If you dont know what a hoogblahboo is or a mongasgataaa. Then there's no way you can ask intelligent questions about alien visitation."
Couldnt agree more.
Essentially what he said - and thats coming from someone whose atleast heard of a Riemennian manifold. Please tell me how any of this is related Eric. Why DOESNT THE HOST SAY SOMETHING??
@@placer7412... why didn't the host ask him to speak about those things he mentioned??? School us, why don't you???
He can't give a straight answer if his life depends of it.
Bout like my ex
@@RaikenXion ROFLMAO too relatable
Dazzling themselves with their own brilliance
No offense meant here, but, do you realize that your skepticism is actually negativism? It is not your fault, as negativism is all around us, particularly in the media. Dig under negativism and you'll find nihilism, the rejection of the material world as dirty and degraded, Calvinist stuff.
@Karma-fp7ho -- And baffling us with their bullshit.
Eric is the only person who will talk so much and actually mean virtually nothing
I think it's so weird that people still don't believe this story.
Believe what? Did you see any clear evidence yet? Could be a cover up
@@giespouwen8091The consensus is that something's definitely happening - the question is: what is it?
What story? Felt like i was watching a stand up comic that never got to the punchline... Lol
@@aceloco817there’s a lot of stories that go back as far as story telling.
@@giespouwen8091 Zimbabwe ufo, what more proof do a person need to believe ufo are real.
Unlike Eric, I have literally been with 500ft of a massive craft when it "popped" in. It didn't fly in. There was a extremely quick and big atmospheric event, and the craft literally popped out of it and flew away to the south. This was sub 500ft! Over a residential area on a cold crystal clean night. Craft had no lights, no sound, no air displacement etc. It was shaped like a manta ray and was at least 250ft tip to tip. Now what I think about the dimensional aspect. To many people think they "live" or are coming from another dimension. I don't think it's that. I think they have figured out how to isolate dimensions. We are bound to 3+1. Well if we where to figure how to remove one of more dimensions during travel, things get fast very quick. If you remove length, time doesn't matter. If you remove time, lentgh, width, depth, none of that matters, thing become instantaneous. How do we measure power? Time over distance. How do we speed that up? Add power! Somone or something has figured out how to get around what we know. And it may be a system that doesn't require much power to actually travel on.
The craft I saw was insane in size, yet looked completely weightless. It didn't look high energy. It looked effortless.
Drugs are bad mmmmmmk?
@@cmo5807 are you crazy?
Drugs are great. Lol.
Was it off the California coast? Near the Lockheed Martin 'Skunk Works'?
@laidoffjournalist Nope. I'm in Cornwall Ontario Canada. I do live about an hr from both main Lockheed facilities in Canada, but this craft was not from here. Like I said, one minute it's crystal clear skies, next Minute there is a craft the size of a football field popping out of thin air and just floating by.
What your describing in being effortless is the golf swing of the immortal Bobby Jones. Powerful, and yet, so silky smooth you'd swear you're witnessing an angel of the C A S O D E X.
Now let us pray for ultra smoothness in all that we do.
Thanks
Chris: "Why?"
Eric: "What do you mean?"
Brilliant.
4:38 I love how Eric expresses this completely obvious concept as though it’s something profoundly intellectual and deep. Obviously we don’t know what the secrets are about. Hence the title.
Yet, so many people seem to be utterly impressed by his pseudo-intellectual repacking of trivialities. It's actually amazing.
@@L233233
It is like he is making shit up on the go and needs those long pauses to try and get himself out of a corner. When asked "Say more." He responds 'I don't want to'. That is a very well informed person discussing his life's work.
@@L233233 you just cant recognize a genius when you see one just because he's quirky and a little (understandable) arrogant. Pseudo intellectual said to eric is beyond insanity
@@spirti9591 What exactly makes this dude a "genius"? You seem easily impressionable.
@@L233233 I'm not. He's way of approaching complex concepts is different than most scientists I've seen talking on podcast.
Best Weinstein Quote, "either the universe is traversable or it isn't and if it is then they are here." Agreed!! I've been saying this for years.
true
......but it isn't.............................
*2 dimensional thinking.*
No shit Sherlock. Captain obvious.
@@saltybits9954really living up to your name there, eh bud?
I love being a functional scientist watching a mathematical theorist using terms that have no real relevance to the subject like determinant line bundle and reimannian manifold in a dismissal of arguments like theories on the existence of sentient non human beings when they're simply non Euclidean or non linear geometric devices (tools for mathematicians). He seems to embody the adage "if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail" only with mathematics priciples. I feel we should chain mathematicians to a basement and feed them the calculations we need solved. Letting them theorize practical dynamics just allows them to convolute any subject, in a really pompous kind of way.
"Nothing I can think of makes sense." That's because its not from within your box. In fact, this is a multi-dimensional tube, that your "box-mind" hasn't even considered yet. I look forward to Eric becoming deeply interested in this topic. We need him to become involved.
He's right. Space is not a traversable medium with spaceships. The size and time difference is too vast for it to ever be viable. Whatever mechanism that makes quantum entanglement work, is the key to space travel. It could also be through your consciousness as well
The answer you are looking for is that, there are MANY explanations for what we are seeing in regards to UFOs.
So Eric has no idea, but you do? Shut up.
@@kb_dev cry more noob
@@kb_devthere's nothing he said that couldn't be logically inferred, no special knowledge required. Because we know or understand so little about the subject matter, we could be observing multiple related or even completely unrelated phenomena and events, and we wouldn't know any better until we learn more. Regardless of whether or not that's true, it's an entirely reasonable speculation until proven otherwise.
But How do I fill out this checkbox? What do I do?! :)
*bot
Eric finally gets serious in the interview at minute 9. He was being very evasive before this.
Not evasion, boredom.
to me, a genius is someone who takes complex ideas and makes it simple. Eric is not half as smart as he thinks he is
Agreed, he sounds way to confident about subject matters he doesn't know for sure
Nikola Tesla was most certainly a genius... do you understand his work? Fuck no.
@@csachleb... please, use the polite version spelling --> "phuque." 😂😂😂
I used to think that if and when I ever see a UAP or UFO I would think 'Aliens', now if ever I see a UFO, I will think 'Black Ops'.
You do realize this phenomenon predates any concept of "black ops" right ?
@@FunkadelickBut they do now. Can't ignore that.
Yes. With the maturing landscape within this subject and technology, even though I believe in ETs, it will be difficult to convince me we have the real thing. I'm weary of stagecraft.
Far to advance to be black ops.
If we had this technology we would have used it for military or commercial applications by now. That's all we do with technology. Use it to make money.
That's why the idea that we have this technology is absolutely ridiculous
The lighting of this video is superb. Shout out to whoever filmed this.
I used to read science fiction novels because I thought this world was so prosaic and boring, but now I just wake up every day and I’m in the strangest story of all time.
I don't know who said it but I read a quote some time ago and now it popped into my mind while reading your comment. It went something like this: "Of course reality is stranger than fiction. Fiction has to make sense."
true
I have seen one of these things myself.
A year ago in southern Ohio I saw one emerge from a cloud bank after a storm.
It was flying south very slow no sound no lights. I saw it for like 30 seconds until it went into the next cloud bank.
I was out looking for animals with my thermal scope. It was plain as day...football shaped. I think it may have been a flight test from wright Patterson AFB as it is not far away.
Awhile back I used the ISS tracker to view what was supposed to be the ISS. According to the app, it was to pass over my house at 9:10am EST and AGAIN at 9:17am EST. Both times I was able to view an object in orbit. But one object can't orbit the planet in 7 minutes.
For the first 1/2 of the vid, I thought they were saying “David Koresh”
I bet that was confusing
Lol, right?
I did too the first time they said the name.
Who are they talking about?
Anyone: Morning Eric!....
Eric: Say More!?
*Protons do not collide.
Neutrons collide 😊
My boy Wartz!!! Good 2 see you
Actually, it is interdimensional beings.
Pauses so long I keep thinking my phone is about to ring lol .. great convo tho 🙂
I kept thinking I lost reception…
I thought it was just me hahah. I was driving and it kept pausing and I kept looking at my phone expecting to see a name lol
It’s his insane narcissism
Hes a character for sure
I thought the vid had ended 😄
Does anyone know the 1971 Australian Documentary Eric talked about 7:47 ???
he said it was a document release
Frustrating to hear Eric say no-one else develops theories on UFOs physics when in fact there ARE, maybe not American that much, yes, but there are.
One should keep an open mind to observe what is out there as well before drawing conclusions, as he says himself.
You gotta respect a man that admits he can be wrong and is willing to venture a guess.
He wants us to believe that we're not smart enough to figure it out either. Psyop.
@@microwavedinamerica3005just because someone says something you don't like doesn't automatically make it a "psyop" lol
Fucking hell man not everything is a conspiracy. Some people actually believe what they say, aren't being forced to say it. People are diverse, we don't all think the same. It's not a damn conspiracy
Our appointed "geniuses" say that a problem is too complex so that we won't bother trying to figure it out for ourselves. And when some regular guy says he has an answer, we won't listen to him because we'll think: there's no way he can be right because the "geniuses" don't even know. Let's all just wait until the geniuses can figure this out for us.
@@microwavedinamerica3005 Have you figured it out?
@@microwavedinamerica3005 That's the Ego and that's what people get for listening to those who like their egos stroked.
Eric - great to see your updated take. 👍
It was just 10mins of waffle as per usual
Check the other reply to you, why do they bother watching videos like this, just to unleash their destructive criticism?
Eric, I'd love to tell you about the day aliens landed on our school yard in Zimbabwe.
eric always has that vibe like ur best friend spilling the tea
Love that ending! Pretty much the most profound statement ever made, and then BAM, you slap us with an ad...🤣
Yeah but I do like that he makes his ad at the end of stuff so you can shut it off, rather than having to endure one in the middle. Nom?
@@ScootMcNichols SAME! I respect any RUclipsr that has the decency to put the ads in right at the end of their vids. It's common curtesy to the viewer.
Awesome Thanks for the podcasts.
What i find odd is that I feel like I'm the only guy who has never seen an alien or witnessed a ufo
You’re not. Although once when I was eight I lied and claimed I saw one.
@@granthuling3235 been there
What's more likely? A bunch of people lying or these things actually happening? In all honesty? I don't know.
Bob Lazar actually took his friends out to the desert to watch test flights of the craft he was studying. That’s pretty damn convincing
One of the strangest guys on the podcast circuit. Incapable of making a succinct coherent point - he tries to hard to impress upon the audience how smart he is and gets lost in his own word salad.
….too hard….
Yeah 😅😅😅
@@douglassummers9901 thanks for the correction. Bad grammar annoys me also 🤣
The only thing I am sure of is that the devil is in the details.
There are elements in the periodic table we have yet to discover that will be able to do incredible things with space travel i bet
Eric Weinstein is one of the most fascinating person I've found on RUclips. The interviews with him blow me away. I would love to talk with him over a beer, wine, coffee, tea, whatever he prefers to drink, and just ask questions and listen to him respond. He is an absolutely brilliant and fascinating man. In fact, I'd love to hear a conversation between him and Jordan Peterson but I'm afraid they would leave me in the dust of their fast paced intellects.
Thanks you Eric for making yourself available to the public and persons such as I.
It took me 50 years to be convinced that we are actually being visited by other civilisations. So I understand that many people have some doubts without being so stupid that they laugh about such an important thing. In the 70ies I helped some serious researchers to investigate and debunk Swedish UFO cases. And the last two years I’ve studied all the most important data and listened to the most reliable witnesses. It finally made me convinced.
That's funny, it's taken me 40 years to come to the realization that we've never been visited by aliens, and probably never will be. It's interesting how peoples' paths on a subject like this can diverge so widely, despite growing up around roughly the same events.
There’s something
@@WaxPaper The difference is that you are most probably wrong and I'm most probably right. You haven't studied enough evidence. Especielly the developments in the last couple of years have been mindblowing. Look att the full 2.5 hours witness testimonys at the US Congress last summer. Just one example of many, many others.
@@KalleBlomqvist Oh I've seen it all, I've been a UFO guy since high school, and I knew who Lazar was decades ago. I've been paying attention. The events after 2015 are what finally made me change my opinion, though. I don't wanna argue though, so let's just say you're right and I'm wrong.
yeah, yeah, yeah, and my grandma was born on mars in 1922@@WaxPaper
80 seconds before I said: "What the fuck kind of jargon is that"...
a new record for watching Eric
"How do you square that circle"?
- i got some bad news buddy...
Why are the UFOs blurry. ALL THE TIME.
Areil School Zimbabwe,very very tough to explain.
Yea that's a wild case
So many cases are hard. Eyes on cinema has the greatest collection of evidence from the last 70 years
Totally agree
That was debunked. The days leading up to that sighting the kids were given lessons on the myth of UFO's and Aliens and shown movies and documentaries of UFOS and Aliens and so the next day they all went around saying 'I saw a
UFO, you saw a UFO etc etc" They were fed it into there imagination!
And school in Australia
“You people are not smart enough to be allowed to have these conversations” is a great mindset. Thanks!
It’s a fair point.
@youngdylan5083 no it's not. The physics of how they literally got here don't much matter. At least not until we understand why they are here, what they want, who they are, etc.
@@derbin4048
Agreed. Also, how does anyone know physics has anything to do with it. Eric thinks physics is the end all be all, but it can't get us to visit other planets. So, as far as we know so far physics is as useless as anything else in understanding how they travel. So even though he thinks he's the smartest person on the planet he's no closer to understanding it more than anyone else, which means everyone is invited to the table... even asshole, smug physicists.
@@derbin4048 fair point.
9:55 Talk to Jack Sarfatti ! I think their egos are matched and both are good speakers.
In differential geometry, a Riemannian manifold is a smooth manifold with a positive-definite inner product at each point. The inner product is a tensor field that allows for the definition of Euclidean space notions on manifold.
Lackatski said they breached the hull of nhi craft. I get what Eric is saying but he's making conjectures without all the necessary facts.
claims are not facts
I am a knower, not a believer, of this strange topic. I can't tell you the name of what I experienced or where it came from, only that it is. I experienced it along with witnesses. It was amazing and it killed off that quick to scoff part of my ego. In an instant it made all the people who smirk at this subject (including myself) look really dumb, closed minded, and arrogant. Science can tell me I didn't experience this and it doesn't matter anymore because I saw and I know.
Knowing and believing are two different realities. 😉
You know, I have heard that if you have been holding on to stuff in your home for a number of years and never use it, then you should just throw it away. Maybe we should just throw all this stuff away, since nobody has made any heads or tails of if for so many years. Holding useless stuff and replacing it with things you can use makes sense, yes?
Gotta go get one of those placed drinks !
“When it comes to this topic I can’t generate a single explanation, it makes no sense”
“If aliens are here I might be the only guy who knows how they’re here”
The reason the shiny craft are real is the simple fact that individuals from all walks of life have been seeing them in the sky for many decades. You see the problem with asserting there's no "proof" of their existence is the fact people can't stop seeing them; and on occasion taking credible photos as well. Thus, they are on the misty edge of our culture, yet deeply ingrained in it via all manner of media.
I've never seen one of those credible photos, could you post a link to one of them so the rest of us can see it too? Thanks!
@@user-wv6wq1ck3kthe calvine ufo pictures are one of the ones believed to be legit for example, but we can’t really know
@@user-wv6wq1ck3k Arizona lights? Video plus thousands of witnesses. The governor himself, a former member of the air force said he saw the craft itself, along with many others. I mean at some point you either believe that something is happening or you believe that pilots (military & commercial), astronauts, police, and others from all walks of life are lying. Do your research. There are astronauts, and pilots from all over the world who've seen them.
Humans have been seeing them for millennia.
@@krzykris And fairies. And ghosts.
Say interdimentional space beings one more time 😂🤣😂🤙
I dare you, I double dare you!
...and we'll write you a letter, telling you how angry we are....
Only an interdimentional space being would say something like that.
Everything is interdimensional.
Wouldn’t it be marvelous if Eric had a Close Encounter with the real deal? 🤯
Just submitted my FOIA requests for Romanian manifolds and determinant line bundles! Wish me luck! 😂
Eric is so far one of the few who is seriously approaching the subject... Tired of the many "know-it-all" that do not even pay attention the data
There’s hardly anyone covering it, and this dude is the last guy on earth that needs to. He literally doesn’t know anything about it at all.
"There's almost no topic where I can't generate multiple explanations..." Indubitably, Mr. Weinstein.
If the time machine is ever invented its already here because it's a time machine
You can’t time travel the way most think, you gotta go to a new universe.
............err........yeah...............rriiiiight ...........like..........most people think...................................................
Weinstein: you need to know about linebundles if you want to talk about aliens
Weinstein: i went to harvard and know about linebundles and i was totally wrong about aliens.
Weinstein: let me tell you about aliens and ufos.
Why is the video not on apple of spotify?