As always, very pedagogical and captivating. I pretty much enjoy all your videos - from the craziness of the chesscube time (or whatever it’s called) to the analytical games you present to us. You are probably the only person I’ve watched videos of that I would genuinely like to meet in person. A quick anecdote: this morning as I was driving to work, there was a slow driver in the left lane and I caught myself saying out loud “he’s a left-laner” and I laughed without knowing why (I’m not even an English speaker!). Then I realized I just adapted one of your “he’s a non-mover”! Thank you for existing, Jerry.
Haha, love it! I can't believe I'm actually hoping to get nona-fried tomorrow morning. That would only give me a chance to throw in these queensider/left-laner neologisms. Those time-tickers will for now on be a permanent source a happiness to me. Isn't life wonderful?
Jerry thank you for this I've been craving some engine games lately! While we should not ask anymore of your infinitely generous soul, if you'd be willing to take a suggestion, I'd like to see some more kibitzing. You have a talent for not only analyzing games but providing commentary on the spot.
That’s a bit of a bold statement but I agree it was a very instructive game. Play like a computer and you will beat the player that plays like a worse computer.
Are calculators AI seems akin to asking is a brain intelligence. One could argue that "hardware", whether brain or silicon, is not intelligent alone without a mechanism of "reasoning". This reasoning is likely to be rule sets, logic encoded in algorithm or mechanical structure in the case of the brain (from my understanding). Logic needs hardware to run on and hardware needs logic to be useful. My point is there seems to be more to intelligence than hardware.
Jerry, we really missed you having analysis videos. Please please do more... In addition, great game indeed and who would guess that rock move... Amazing really! Thank you for the video.
Hey Jerry, did you know that this game sparked a debate about the openings the engines had to play? At every game, the engines were given a specific opening they had to play, usually two or three moves into the opening before the engines took over. The Ginkgo team complained that having to play the Old Benoni was unfair, because you would be at a disadvantage from move 3. I also think it's unfair, but the organizers apparently didn't.
Those pop quizzes really took me for a whirl! Clearly I need to study up for the exam. Thanks for the thrills, Jerry! Ps. Did I hear you foreshadow another Solomon's Key let's play video? :P
Would be cool if you could show both of the engines eval during the game :) In a none engine game i understand it's not a good thing to do, but when two engines playing i think it would be fun to see how they compare to each others.
Hey Jerry! I certainly get what you're saying about Solomon's Key! I actually have a retro gaming channel and mention your amazing run of that game during the 3rd "NES Virgin" episode where we play it too.. far far worse than you play it for sure! Trapped rooks are like trapped Dana lol! Rf4 was a juicy move in this one.. great video as always, sir :)
I've watched a lot of your videos ,and now I have a little jerry in my head while I play(hmm that creates a weakness,hmm that's a free piece lol)I'm still rated dumbass01 but you really helped my game so thank you
I figured Rf4. was the key move, but only because you drew attention to the dark square bishop and the long diagonal a few times. I knew that white would want to remove the e5 pawn somehow. Nice game.
One strong sign that we are a semi-intelligent is that we can program a computer to beat us at one of the most complex games. Now, to prove that we are really intelligent, we have to be able to control that power. Thank you for the game, Jerry.
That Rook f4 reminds me of the Kasparov's Immortal Rook Sacrifice. I guess SuperGrandmasters would not have too much problem to find Rf4 move as it is only 4-move deep tactic. As Fisher said, tactics flow from superior position, and White has clearly superior position there. I believe that top players would look forward to such sacrifices in order to clear diagonals, give checks and make use of the strong Queen + Knight combination.
the 1st 2 moves were not played by the engines, they were book moves. I don't know why the benoni was selected for tcec 2017 when by the 1980s the benoni was known to be poor for black.
Joshua Mitchell probably Stockfish. Last year's winner and current favorite this year, with the results to back it up (9.5/10 last I'd heard at the current point in the competition).
in 7:30 i think Nf6 it's better ... it's a check ... and the king either must go to the h8 square and then im gonna take his night in d7 with a discover check ... and what ever he did Qf6 followed with Qg2 is unstoppable ... and if he didnt move his king he'll take with his night ... and i'll take with the Q ... and the same check mate ... correct me if im wrong!
... Nxf6 and if you use the Queen to recapture, hoping for mate, the second Black Knight moves forward and Black Queen is there to defend everything. This is how I see this, I'm not even 1400 Elo player. After that i checked your Nf6 using Stockfish. Evaluation drops from +3.3 into -6.2. and ... Nxf6, Qxf6, Ne5 follows.
What Stockfish taught me here: 1. Castling is a waste of time 2. Pushing the h pawn should always be done 3. Don't bother with your rooks; they're sacrificial
Hmmm... I paused the video after move 18 because you said a 'star move' was coming. But then... there was 'only' Rf4? Sure, it is a good move with that nice combination, the (delayed) queeens-exchange and all. But in the end there is not much coming out of it and the game has to drag on until the end-game to squeeze out a pawn-advantage. I immediately saw a much better move which (at the very least) wins a knight - a very tangible advantage right away. And that move is Nf6. Why? Because the biggest story on the board (and surely the reason why white played Qe6) is the mate in 2 if the white queen ever comes to f6 (that is a very strong pawn on h6 after all). I even think that black made a grave mistake with Qc7 in move 18, giving up one defendant of that hyper-dangerous f6-square. Now, there is only one lonely knight on d7 preventing the quick death! So why not kick that knight with the white knight moving to f6? Black cannot take that knight on f6 since the queen takes back with mate in 2. If the black knight runs away, nobody defends f6 anymore and there is mate in 2. If the knight is protected, e.g., with Rd8, then the white knight takes the black knight anyway and nobody can take the white knight back since then the queen would come to f6 with mate in 2. The best course of action for black would be to go back with the queen to d8 (where she should have stayed in the first place!) or - for the rook being able to protect f6 - to move the knight on the f file to g5 (poking the white queen a bit in the process, so the queen has to take the knight on d7 first). But in all these cases the knight on d7 can be taken (maybe with an exchange of queens) and in the end of every combination I can see, white has (at least) one full minor piece advantage. Seems way too obvious to me to believe that the 2 strong programs (both of them) wouldn't see it. Am I missing something here?
I play only Czech Benoni against d4, and I'm shocked that Ginkgo didn't play more standard moves. Yes I am aware that Stockfish would still claim it's winning, but Ginkgo didn't follow any established theory. Just a couple points:1) You're not supposed to go f5 without sufficient preparation. 2) You want to exchange dark square bishops early on. 3) If white is going to launch a quick king side attack, don't castle at all, maneuver both knights to the 6th in front of the pawns on the king side
7Stanimir7 they only have the first few moves programmed into the machine, so after that it was on its own. It probably isn't programmed with the same general tips you'd learn when learning how to play an opening.
How are the engines' ratings determined if they're so much stronger than humans? How do we know that their ratings are 3200 vs. 3000, instead of 3400 vs. 3200 or 4200 vs. 4000?
sneakyknight There's a limit to how high an elo can go, it's a relative score but at some point (I believe around 3200) it starts being impossible to gain points since it rounds down because of how little you gain from each won match or something like that, saw that on Quora and going off of memory.
That's what I originally thought, but I'm less sure now because of recent events with Alpha Go Zero. Lee Sedol, one of the top Go players in the world, is ~3500 ELO, Alpha Go that played against him last year was ~3700 ELO, but Alpha Go Zero, which came out this month, is a whopping 5200 ELO. I think ELO systems are the same between chess and Go, so I'm starting to question if there really is a ceiling.
Hi, Jerry. I play 1-minute games and I have developed a specific attack against kingside fianchetto over the years. I'm wondering if this is a known attack and if it has a name. Recently I beat an IM with this attack (see the first game). I have explained it here: lichess.org/forum/game-analysis/an-attack-i-have-developed-against-kingside-fianchetto
Along with the normal ways a chess game can end (checkmate, stalemate, three-fold repetition, and the 50 move rule), there are 2 other ways that a game can end in the TCEC: - 1) After move 40, if *BOTH* engines evaluate the odds as between 0.5 and -0.5 for five moves in a row, the game is declared a draw. 2) From the start of the game (i.e.: after move 1), if *BOTH* engines evaluate the odds as 6.5 or above for four moves in a row, the game is declared a win for the side with the advantage. - The point about both engines having that evaluation is an important one though. The game is never terminated when one engine evaluates the odds as a draw but the other evaluates it as a win.
I can't find any reference to a Komodo vs Stockfish game with a mate in 59. If you can remember which specific game it was, I would love to check it out. I always love seeing super far out calculated mates that engines are able to come up with.
Just because an engine has calculated a mate doesn't necessarily mean that there is a mate, though. Perhaps there was a miscalculation in the mate-in-59 computation.
8:13 -- in a way this is the critical position of the game, well after the amazing rook sac. White had to see the sac, then evaluate the best line, then be able to find 25. Kd2 and say "I have a winning endgame". Because at my skill level I'm looking at the position and saying "Maybe White is a little better?" So the computer has to find that crazy amazing sacrifice, work out the tactics, just to get a position that maybe to it is obviously better, but to me requires some study to evaluate.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
There are multiple pop quizzes in this video.
Be ready to pause & see if you can find the "game move" in each instance.
ChessNetwork I don't know how else to say it so here it goes I love you
Chessnetwork i have feelings for you
At 6:34, what happens if black rook moves to g8?
knight to f6
I found rook f4! So happy I got it. My instincts told me the pressure would be too great with the bishop getting a clear view of the king.
As always, very pedagogical and captivating. I pretty much enjoy all your videos - from the craziness of the chesscube time (or whatever it’s called) to the analytical games you present to us. You are probably the only person I’ve watched videos of that I would genuinely like to meet in person. A quick anecdote: this morning as I was driving to work, there was a slow driver in the left lane and I caught myself saying out loud “he’s a left-laner” and I laughed without knowing why (I’m not even an English speaker!). Then I realized I just adapted one of your “he’s a non-mover”! Thank you for existing, Jerry.
Thank you for the very nice compliment. That's a pretty funny note. 😎 A left-laner! Aka a queensider (from white's perspective) Thanks again Fred.
Haha, love it! I can't believe I'm actually hoping to get nona-fried tomorrow morning. That would only give me a chance to throw in these queensider/left-laner neologisms. Those time-tickers will for now on be a permanent source a happiness to me. Isn't life wonderful?
I really hate the ones who drive slowly in the left lane side-by-side with someone in the right; I call them double douchers.
Awesome, another engine game! Thanks for listening to our request!
MOAAAAAR PLEASE!
Love engine vs engine games
Thank you so much Jerry
Can't get enough of these engine games. Your presentation is tops. Looking forward to many more.
I just love your analysis. It is so gentle and instructive. Thank you
Loved the Solomon's Key reference. I appreciated your video on that game.
😎
I watched in awe as the game took place live. Now watching this incredible breakdown. Excellent work from ChessNetwork as always)
Thank you. It was a fun one to cover.
I loved your Solomon's Key 100% play through, that was a great video.
😎
Thank you so much for these videos! I hope you continue in the future :-)
Jerry thank you for this I've been craving some engine games lately! While we should not ask anymore of your infinitely generous soul, if you'd be willing to take a suggestion, I'd like to see some more kibitzing. You have a talent for not only analyzing games but providing commentary on the spot.
Your commentary is always great, very educational. Thanks Jerry.
Wow what a game.
Great commentary btw, VERY clear, and lots of excellent insight. And crisply delivered.
Thank you 👍
That was a great combo for White. These types of videos are always fun to watch. Keep up the good work
I love your game analysis videos. Interesting to see top level engines play
Super Duel!
Thanks Jerry for your analysis!!
I have experience with Soloman's Key. Watching you play it! That was one of the most amazing things I've ever seen.
Extremely clear explanations of the reasons behind the opening moves! Thank you
Thank you Jerry!!! As always, simply amazing analysis!
What a great video. Thanks for taking the time to review
Thank you Phil. 😎
WOW what a game. Amazing. One day AI's will rule the world. More engine games please.
That’s a bit of a bold statement but I agree it was a very instructive game. Play like a computer and you will beat the player that plays like a worse computer.
This is not really AI, just an algorithm. Are calculators AI?
Stephen Ryan en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect
Are calculators AI seems akin to asking is a brain intelligence. One could argue that "hardware", whether brain or silicon, is not intelligent alone without a mechanism of "reasoning". This reasoning is likely to be rule sets, logic encoded in algorithm or mechanical structure in the case of the brain (from my understanding). Logic needs hardware to run on and hardware needs logic to be useful. My point is there seems to be more to intelligence than hardware.
True. Using calculators to debunk high level AI's is like saying: but flies have brains too, humans are NOT intelligent!
Love the TCEC videos please keep them coming!
😎
So glad Jerry is making multiple videos of games from TCEC, I thought he might not!! :)
Jerry, we really missed you having analysis videos. Please please do more... In addition, great game indeed and who would guess that rock move... Amazing really! Thank you for the video.
It is a beautiful shot/idea.
Beautiful combination, really!
For sure! 👍
Hey Jerry, did you know that this game sparked a debate about the openings the engines had to play? At every game, the engines were given a specific opening they had to play, usually two or three moves into the opening before the engines took over. The Ginkgo team complained that having to play the Old Benoni was unfair, because you would be at a disadvantage from move 3.
I also think it's unfair, but the organizers apparently didn't.
stockfish has czech benoni too probably, but it defended
I didn't know about that, but I can definitely understand team Ginkgo's complaint.
Well it’s fair if they make stockfish do the same and play with Czech Benoni
Maybe the source was wrong but I read that for that stage this year the engines did not play the same opening from both sides.
Given that as of writing this comment Ginkgo is in 3rd position, it doesn't have much to worry about. (Top 8 engines get to the next stage.)
When Jerry started showing the combination after Rf4 i kept saying "thats not even funny"
Those pop quizzes really took me for a whirl! Clearly I need to study up for the exam. Thanks for the thrills, Jerry!
Ps. Did I hear you foreshadow another Solomon's Key let's play video? :P
re: Not quite 😎
And here I was looking forward to some Solomon's Key. You're such a tease, Jerry :P
Please review the recent Komodo vs Stockfish game! SF had it's first noticeable blunder
If you're going to do another TCEC video I might recommend Chiron vs Stockfish--incredible closed position maneuvering.
I love that you thought of Solomon's Key!
I like these engine games, thanks!
Not the only brilliant queen sacrifice by Stockfish this season. Could we have a review of game 102, Wasp vs. Stockfish?
Would be cool if you could show both of the engines eval during the game :) In a none engine game i understand it's not a good thing to do, but when two engines playing i think it would be fun to see how they compare to each others.
"Wow! Stockfish can't be defeat-"
You-Know-Who: "Hold my beer."
AlphaZero is that you-know-who.
Fantastic Game and Analysis!
Thank you, and love your NES controller for an icon. 👍
Hey Jerry! I certainly get what you're saying about Solomon's Key! I actually have a retro gaming channel and mention your amazing run of that game during the 3rd "NES Virgin" episode where we play it too.. far far worse than you play it for sure! Trapped rooks are like trapped Dana lol! Rf4 was a juicy move in this one.. great video as always, sir :)
💗
I love Solomon's Key. One of the few forgotten games from the eighties that still is entertaining. A great challenge!
on 7:31, can he play knight to f6 and after black knight capture play queen to f6. Does is this a better move?
This video shows what kind of teachers videos and computers can be. I think they make us as a group better players.
That was actually a pretty 'straight-forward' game between engines, not the usual deep stuff I see going on where I get lost after the opening. o.O
Hey Jerry. Love your content. When do you stream on Twitch usually?
What a game! Thanks.
First fiery combo from Stockfish I’ve seen in awhile. Brilliant.
This is amazing on so many levels, love it. At what point did stockfish have this line worked out? As in was it before rook f4?
I love these videos, even if I've never actually got one of your "what happens next" questions right. One day ...
I've watched a lot of your videos ,and now I have a little jerry in my head while I play(hmm that creates a weakness,hmm that's a free piece lol)I'm still rated dumbass01 but you really helped my game so thank you
You're welcome. 😎
Thanks for the video Jerry, you’re awesome :)
great video, jerry!
Sweeeeeet, a new Jerry vid.
Jerry, who draws these great Dr. Suess style graphics you've got in your videos?
I figured Rf4. was the key move, but only because you drew attention to the dark square bishop and the long diagonal a few times. I knew that white would want to remove the e5 pawn somehow. Nice game.
@ChessNetwork have you played, play magnus app?
Absolutely brilliant. What a domination.
what a game, the pop quizzes are a little bit unfair in this game ^^.
really nice analyses as usual.
Thanks. What's unfair? The idea is to get the viewer thinking some on his/her own. 😎
One strong sign that we are a semi-intelligent is that we can program a computer to beat us at one of the most complex games. Now, to prove that we are really intelligent, we have to be able to control that power. Thank you for the game, Jerry.
Thank you Mr. B 😎
Awesome comments. Wonder what Magnus and like will make of this game.
That Rook f4 reminds me of the Kasparov's Immortal Rook Sacrifice. I guess SuperGrandmasters would not have too much problem to find Rf4 move as it is only 4-move deep tactic. As Fisher said, tactics flow from superior position, and White has clearly superior position there. I believe that top players would look forward to such sacrifices in order to clear diagonals, give checks and make use of the strong Queen + Knight combination.
After watching this, don't we all wish we could play like Stockfish?
A knight at h8 on move 10 looks like an opening disaster for Black to me
How about a video description link to your Solomon's Key walkthrough, Jerry?!
ruclips.net/video/QnS0mVPmvUE/видео.html
wonderful.
I train against Stockfish quite a bit. Thing is CRAZY!!! (crazy, soulcrushing genious)
Amazing !
very instructive
the 1st 2 moves were not played by the engines, they were book moves. I don't know why the benoni was selected for tcec 2017 when by the 1980s the benoni was known to be poor for black.
More engine games
WOW what a analysis
What computer program is giving evaluations on other computer programs?
Joshua Mitchell probably Stockfish. Last year's winner and current favorite this year, with the results to back it up (9.5/10 last I'd heard at the current point in the competition).
in 7:30 i think Nf6 it's better ... it's a check ... and the king either must go to the h8 square and then im gonna take his night in d7 with a discover check ... and what ever he did Qf6 followed with Qg2 is unstoppable ... and if he didnt move his king he'll take with his night ... and i'll take with the Q ... and the same check mate ... correct me if im wrong!
... Nxf6 and if you use the Queen to recapture, hoping for mate, the second Black Knight moves forward and Black Queen is there to defend everything.
This is how I see this, I'm not even 1400 Elo player. After that i checked your Nf6 using Stockfish. Evaluation drops from +3.3 into -6.2. and ... Nxf6, Qxf6, Ne5 follows.
you right ... thanks ... i didnt see it!
would fide grant me a GM title if I had found Rf4
I'm sure. 😉
Thx Jerry
What Stockfish taught me here:
1. Castling is a waste of time
2. Pushing the h pawn should always be done
3. Don't bother with your rooks; they're sacrificial
whats the difference between a good bishop and a bad bishop
black seemed squashed like a bug from the opening it was given from the 4th ply
Hmmm... I paused the video after move 18 because you said a 'star move' was coming. But then... there was 'only' Rf4? Sure, it is a good move with that nice combination, the (delayed) queeens-exchange and all. But in the end there is not much coming out of it and the game has to drag on until the end-game to squeeze out a pawn-advantage. I immediately saw a much better move which (at the very least) wins a knight - a very tangible advantage right away. And that move is Nf6. Why? Because the biggest story on the board (and surely the reason why white played Qe6) is the mate in 2 if the white queen ever comes to f6 (that is a very strong pawn on h6 after all). I even think that black made a grave mistake with Qc7 in move 18, giving up one defendant of that hyper-dangerous f6-square. Now, there is only one lonely knight on d7 preventing the quick death! So why not kick that knight with the white knight moving to f6? Black cannot take that knight on f6 since the queen takes back with mate in 2. If the black knight runs away, nobody defends f6 anymore and there is mate in 2. If the knight is protected, e.g., with Rd8, then the white knight takes the black knight anyway and nobody can take the white knight back since then the queen would come to f6 with mate in 2. The best course of action for black would be to go back with the queen to d8 (where she should have stayed in the first place!) or - for the rook being able to protect f6 - to move the knight on the f file to g5 (poking the white queen a bit in the process, so the queen has to take the knight on d7 first). But in all these cases the knight on d7 can be taken (maybe with an exchange of queens) and in the end of every combination I can see, white has (at least) one full minor piece advantage.
Seems way too obvious to me to believe that the 2 strong programs (both of them) wouldn't see it. Am I missing something here?
@5:28 19. Nf6 Nb6 20. Ne8 Qd8 Defends f6 and white has nothing.
love the computer chess vids!
Would love to know if Ginkgo's evaluation of black's position at move 10 was as bleak as Stockfish's
Ginkgo's evaluation after 10. Be2 was 0.63
10:40 those are the kingside pawns
I play only Czech Benoni against d4, and I'm shocked that Ginkgo didn't play more standard moves. Yes I am aware that Stockfish would still claim it's winning, but Ginkgo didn't follow any established theory. Just a couple points:1) You're not supposed to go f5 without sufficient preparation. 2) You want to exchange dark square bishops early on. 3) If white is going to launch a quick king side attack, don't castle at all, maneuver both knights to the 6th in front of the pawns on the king side
7Stanimir7 they only have the first few moves programmed into the machine, so after that it was on its own. It probably isn't programmed with the same general tips you'd learn when learning how to play an opening.
How are the engines' ratings determined if they're so much stronger than humans? How do we know that their ratings are 3200 vs. 3000, instead of 3400 vs. 3200 or 4200 vs. 4000?
sneakyknight
There's a limit to how high an elo can go, it's a relative score but at some point (I believe around 3200) it starts being impossible to gain points since it rounds down because of how little you gain from each won match or something like that, saw that on Quora and going off of memory.
That's what I originally thought, but I'm less sure now because of recent events with Alpha Go Zero. Lee Sedol, one of the top Go players in the world, is ~3500 ELO, Alpha Go that played against him last year was ~3700 ELO, but Alpha Go Zero, which came out this month, is a whopping 5200 ELO. I think ELO systems are the same between chess and Go, so I'm starting to question if there really is a ceiling.
sneakyknight I don't know much about go so I can't comment.
1:20 c4 is clearly worse (using a 2023 engine), not even in the top 5 at depth 31
Solomon's Key is a classic! Special ending for completionists.
Now....will Stockfish please smash the Benko Gambit?
Hi, Jerry. I play 1-minute games and I have developed a specific attack against kingside fianchetto over the years. I'm wondering if this is a known attack and if it has a name. Recently I beat an IM with this attack (see the first game). I have explained it here: lichess.org/forum/game-analysis/an-attack-i-have-developed-against-kingside-fianchetto
Why stop a engine game early.
So the next game can begin sooner. There's some rule in the TCEC event that when both engines are on + or - 7ish, the game is terminated.
Interesting. Gotta read up on their time rules. Always just figured engine matches would take longer for a human to read than a computer to play.
When do they stop the game?
Tareq Abu El Komboz I think it is when the advantage gets to 7 or above
Along with the normal ways a chess game can end (checkmate, stalemate, three-fold repetition, and the 50 move rule), there are 2 other ways that a game can end in the TCEC:
-
1) After move 40, if *BOTH* engines evaluate the odds as between 0.5 and -0.5 for five moves in a row, the game is declared a draw.
2) From the start of the game (i.e.: after move 1), if *BOTH* engines evaluate the odds as 6.5 or above for four moves in a row, the game is declared a win for the side with the advantage.
-
The point about both engines having that evaluation is an important one though. The game is never terminated when one engine evaluates the odds as a draw but the other evaluates it as a win.
I can't find any reference to a Komodo vs Stockfish game with a mate in 59. If you can remember which specific game it was, I would love to check it out. I always love seeing super far out calculated mates that engines are able to come up with.
Just because an engine has calculated a mate doesn't necessarily mean that there is a mate, though. Perhaps there was a miscalculation in the mate-in-59 computation.
Number 1. is ridiculous if it's true I can't believe that.
Stockfish reminds me of Fischer, simple plans with stunning effect.
Please do more of these, Jerry!
That was brutal.
you said Rh4 instead of Rf4
Rf4 OMG computers are scary
8:13 -- in a way this is the critical position of the game, well after the amazing rook sac. White had to see the sac, then evaluate the best line, then be able to find 25. Kd2 and say "I have a winning endgame". Because at my skill level I'm looking at the position and saying "Maybe White is a little better?" So the computer has to find that crazy amazing sacrifice, work out the tactics, just to get a position that maybe to it is obviously better, but to me requires some study to evaluate.
Look at these ratings. The AI is almost reaching my level, LOL!
Are these chess engines using machine learning, or is it brute force?
Thank you
as long as we dont give these engines a platform ( a body ) to work with i'm fine with their skills. nice queen sac (:
Are you from the UK and afraid of your Queen, that you care about AI having a body? :P
Stockfish learned from Alpha Zero.
Singularity is near!!
It'll never happen.
Mark that on your walls, write it on my grave if you want since I will die due to the singularity not happening.
That can be Stockfish's immortal.