Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

Xi Jinping's solution to his "Taiwan problem" | GZERO World with Ian Bremmer

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 апр 2024
  • New York Times national security correspondent David Sanger on how Xi Jinping intends to solve his "Taiwan" problem before leaving office, and why the semiconductor industry may be the only thing standing in the way of an island invasion.
    Subscribe to GZERO on RUclips and turn on notifications (🔔): / @gzeromedia
    Sign up for GZERO Daily (free newsletter on global politics): rebrand.ly/gzeronewsletter
    "Xi has made it clear he plans to go solve the Taiwan problem while he's still in office." That's New York Times national security correspondent and New Cold Wars author David Sanger on why China's leader is setting his sights on the slender island off its eastern coast. Xi Jinping has made no secret of his belief that Taiwan belongs to China and that it is a national security imperative to bring it under Chinese sovereignty. But it's also an American national security imperative to prevent Xi from doing so, says Sanger. That's because the small island nation still manufactures the vast majority of the critical semiconductor microchips that power our modern world in both China and the United States.
    "What Biden has done here in the semiconductor field of trying to choke the Chinese of the most advanced chips, but also the equipment to make those chips while trying to build up here, is the right step." At the same time, however, the Biden administration's push to manufacture more chips in the United States may also imperil the "silicon shield" that currently protects Taiwan from its Chinese neighbor. Nevertheless, Sanger argues that it's not just an industrial imperative for the United States to become self-sufficient in this area. It's a national defense imperative one as well.
    "For our long-term security, it is much more important to build those [semiconductor factories] fabs than it is to build those aircraft carriers."
    Watch the full interview with David Sanger on GZERO World with Ian Bremmer on US public television beginning this Friday, April 26. Check local listings.
    Catch GZERO World with Ian Bremmer every week on RUclips • GZERO World with Ian B...
    Also available at gzeromedia.com/gzeroworld and on US public television.
    Want to know more about global news and why it matters? Follow us on:
    Instagram: / gzeromedia
    Twitter: / gzeromedia
    TikTok: / gzeromedia
    Facebook: / gzeromedia
    LinkedIn: / gzeromedia
    Threads: threads.net/@gzeromedia
    Subscribe to our RUclips channel and turn on notifications (🔔): / @gzeromedia
    Sign up for GZERO Daily (free newsletter on global politics): rebrand.ly/gzeronewsletter
    Subscribe to the GZERO podcast: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
    GZERO Media is a multimedia publisher providing news, insights and commentary on the events shaping our world. Our properties include GZERO World with Ian Bremmer, our newsletter GZERO Daily, Puppet Regime, the GZERO World Podcast, In 60 Seconds and GZEROMedia.com
    #GZEROWorld #ChinaTaiwan #XiJinping

Комментарии • 36

  • @GZEROMedia
    @GZEROMedia  3 месяца назад +1

    What does a new Cold War look like? Are we in one already? Also, along with the US, who are the main protagonists? Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist David Sanger joins Ian Bremmer to discuss: ruclips.net/video/bVbG4javLmE/видео.html

    • @KatyYoder-cq1kc
      @KatyYoder-cq1kc 2 месяца назад +1

      Report Malicious Use of AI internationally:
      NOW ON LIFE SUPPORT, PLEASE HELP: Cease and desist all malicious use of AI, death threats, rape by lesbians et al., 24/7 harassment and physical abuse: global supremacists, terrorists, communists. I am not your property. My house was broken into, I was given chemicals 3 years ago that caused brain damage and my children and pets were also given chemicals that re-engineered our systems - this was without consent and is an international attack. Please report at the highest level of government and security

  • @Seriouspatt
    @Seriouspatt 3 месяца назад +3

    It's ironic. Now people are blaming companies but governments have options to make companies do what is best for the country and its people. Don't just think for one second it's just the companies that messed up here.
    And maybe it's also time to ban people in congress from stock trading. There are all kinds of incentives that are wrong here.

  • @h79guf
    @h79guf 3 месяца назад +2

    Quite a perspective! Thanks for sharing

  • @dimitristsagdis7340
    @dimitristsagdis7340 3 месяца назад +2

    Title has little bearing with content

  • @user-ey9eu1zb5f
    @user-ey9eu1zb5f 3 месяца назад +1

    Thank you for sharing.

  • @darknightbegins85
    @darknightbegins85 3 месяца назад +2

    Of course the USA is working overtime to secure its strategic interests. What would anyone expect?

  • @ronalda.ortman4759
    @ronalda.ortman4759 3 месяца назад

    This is excellent.

  • @KatyYoder-cq1kc
    @KatyYoder-cq1kc 2 месяца назад +1

    Greed.

  • @barryshaw5660
    @barryshaw5660 3 месяца назад +1

    How’s the weather in fantasy land today

  • @h79guf
    @h79guf 3 месяца назад

    $150B for fabs will be a big yes if manufactured by existing def-tech US company

  • @digitalformosan9330
    @digitalformosan9330 3 месяца назад

    Frankly speaking I think you seriously get the semiconductor industry wrong and understand Taiwan as part of the global supply chain even more wrong.
    It sounds to me that the U.S. government is looking for a reason to use Taiwan as a prawn in its game against China. He also forgot to mention that the U.S. military is selling arms to Taiwan, which were never either not delivered at all or partly only.

  • @reginafefifofina
    @reginafefifofina 3 месяца назад

    Agreed! Is Panasonic or Sam Altman or Elon doing anything interesting?

  • @MichaelJamesAuthor
    @MichaelJamesAuthor 3 месяца назад

    How does David Sanger know what she thinks or wants? Such nonsense. Ian we expect better.

  • @3owlpro
    @3owlpro 3 месяца назад +1

    The position of the United Nations is that the People’s Republic of China represents the whole of China as the sole and legitimate representative Government of China. The decision until now about the wish of the people in Taiwan to join the United Nations has been decided based on The resolution (General Assembly Resolution 2758) mentioning that the Government of China is the sole and legitimate Government and the position of the United Nations is that Taiwan is part of China.

    • @KatyYoder-cq1kc
      @KatyYoder-cq1kc 2 месяца назад +1

      Greed.

    • @3owlpro
      @3owlpro 2 месяца назад +1

      @@KatyYoder-cq1kc do you mean, the DPP government?

    • @3owlpro
      @3owlpro 2 месяца назад +1

      do you mean, the DPP government? greed?

    • @3owlpro
      @3owlpro 2 месяца назад +1

      @@KatyYoder-cq1kc The position of the United Nations is that the People’s Republic of China represents the whole of China as the sole and legitimate representative Government of China. The decision until now about the wish of the people in Taiwan to join the United Nations has been decided based on The resolution (General Assembly Resolution 2758) mentioning that the Government of China is the sole and legitimate Government and the position of the United Nations is that Taiwan is part of China.

  • @chengavitch10
    @chengavitch10 3 месяца назад +1

    The more pertinent question is why has US set its sight on Taiwan.

  • @kshen7485
    @kshen7485 3 месяца назад +2

    China doesn’t need your chip manufacturing in Taiwan, except its territory.

    • @3owlpro
      @3owlpro 3 месяца назад +1

      BRAVO !!!!

  • @user-ok6re8gv1q
    @user-ok6re8gv1q 3 месяца назад

    these days I come to bremmer for a good laugh and to just make sure I keep up with west's propaganda so I know what they are being fed.

  • @RodrigoLobosChile
    @RodrigoLobosChile 3 месяца назад +2

    Fabs > Aircraft carriers???
    No.
    You cannot shoot chips to your enemy.

    • @robbiep742
      @robbiep742 3 месяца назад +2

      Literally every modern missile require advanced chips.

    • @RodrigoLobosChile
      @RodrigoLobosChile 3 месяца назад +1

      @@robbiep742 agree, but it is not one or the other, minimum 11 carriers and all the fabs that you want.

    • @3owlpro
      @3owlpro 3 месяца назад +1

      BRAVO !!!!!!

    • @3owlpro
      @3owlpro 3 месяца назад +1

      @@RodrigoLobosChile Intel is a Design House and TSMC is a contract FABRICATOR only. A chihuahua and a Pitbull dog comparison.

    • @robbiep742
      @robbiep742 3 месяца назад

      @@RodrigoLobosChile until a chinese hypersonic or USV hits a carrier... I don't want to imagine it, but we see with Ukraine how effective drones are against naval targets. But I digress

  • @travcat756
    @travcat756 3 месяца назад +2

    So true it makes you wonder why. Are we that violent? That short sighted? Things need to change. Maybe artificial intelligence will figure us out