When empty yes. GM and others bases their mpg on empty cars. When you load them up is when you see the real deal. The 1.5 is a weak motor. I have a 2011 Terrain and tows more then these new equinox and terrains models and yes I tow a utility trailer all the time with mine. GM needs to put a 2.0 in these not the 1.5L. People often forget they are getting less for their money these days. What are you paying for? A bigger screen you don't need. Right.... Outside of that I do give credit to the designer for making good looking cars! Their power trains need to be revised big time!
@@carlostavaresjr958they sold the Terrain and Equinox with 2.0L turbos from 2018-2020 and they were actually really good. 252hp and 3500lb towing capacity. I don’t know what they stopped selling them. No one wanted them I guess
@JodyDWard Don't be silly! What the customer wants has absolutely nothing to do with GM's decision making! Lol And I agree. I had a 2018 Terrain Denali with the 2.0 and it was much better than the current engine.
The torque on that engine is higher than most of its competitors. That's why its peppy. GM did survey their customers and apparently their current Nox owners aren't concerned with its power. So they put more focus on driving comfort and tech features.
Thanks for the detailed review. My wife currently has a 2019 Equinox and thinking of upgrading in the spring to this exact version of the RS. I have a 2021 Trailblazer RS and love it! I'm about to check out your Activ video next.
It really doesn't look too bad. Nice improvements all the way around. I especially like the expanded storage under-cover above the spare. Nice place to put all that stuff you always leave in like a jump-pack, some bungies, etc. Better than the raised platform in the 4Runner.
I love the new looks and would only buy the AWD version because of the 8 speed transmission. It funny you guys can not talk about driving impressions yet since they are on dealer lots to buy.
Only lower case gm could offer only ONE engine choice with CVT for FWD versions in one of their most high volume main stream mass market compact crossovers, which is absolutely ridiculous. Its missing a hybrid powertrain using a non turbo variant of its 2.0L engine, and a top end 2.0L turbo engine option. Otherwise its a very nice and attractive CUV that will standout in the marketplace, but one that will always be trailing the RAV4 and CRV because of its limited powertrain options. Now will lowercase gm lump both the ICE Equinox and Equinox EV sales together for bragging rights in the compact CUV segment? We'll see.
Hey those instrumentation and infotainment screens are the same or bigger than my C8! Looks dang near interchangeable. What’s a $100k difference between friends.
Unless GM is hiding a hybrid model and just waiting to unveil it at the most dramatic moment, the RAV4 and CRV will still be eating this alive on the sales charts. Hell, even the Tucson and Sportage are taking away sales from the Equinox
I had the old Equinox as a rental and couldn’t wait to get out of it. The seats were horribly uncomfortable, it handled like a pig and was harsh and noisy. This thing better be much improved for nearly $40k for a base model. That sounds crazy. I would much rather have a Mazda CX-50 with a bulletproof non-turbo, AWD, and automatic for $5k less. The title of your video led me to believe they might be offering a hybrid, which might have been remotely interested. I had a 2013 Volt which was a good car. Once again, it seems GM engineers had a great idea that the management and beancounters killed off and let the competition take the market.
GM is nailing it in the design department with these new cars! I'm not impressed with the powertrains. I tow with my 2011 terrain and it tows more then these new equinoxes and terrains. Those engines need to be revised!
2011? Wasnt that the 2.4 liter engines than drank oil like a pig?? A common problem with those engines. Also, the gas mileage was awful on those. My work car was a 2020 Equinox, and I got about 35 mpgs, and turned the car in with 210,000 miles. It ran like a champ. It was under powered, but thats what people want with a coring car like this. Its nothing more than a fleet vehicle/grocery getter/soccer mom car.
Agreed with all. If these had a 200 hp engine they would outsell or at least compete with Toyota because it looks great. Toyota now with the 225 hp hybrid. Big difference. Come on GM. People want to love you. Let them.
If they all have the same screen size and you want to save money. Buy a base model, add some katzkin leather, then add some wheels of your choice if your into that kind of thing.
Test drove and turned around a few miles down the road. Engine and CVT are horrible. Fit and finish is bad. AC sounded weird, can’t explain. Buttons for it are hard to see too.
GM needs to put the 2.0 back in it. That 1.5 is an absolute dog. Also the red interior accents are a deal breaker. Chevy has gone so far but once again just can’t finish 🤦♂️
@@lcann251 I have a 1.5 and don’t need a rocket but it would be nice if the car could get out of its own way. Also they didn’t specify but all the new Traverse’s have red accents regardless of the trim level.
I would rather have a larger normally aspirated engine than a small engine that relies on its turbocharger to carry the vehicle. That poor engine is going to be under strain all the time (especially in high altitude driving)
It is a handsome refresh, but GM can't come close to Toyota's reliability. How many components will a GM owner replace in 10-15 years with 200k plus miles compared to a Toyota? My last new vehicle was a GM. It's 15 years old w/250k mile, and Toyota and Honda comparables haven't had to replace a 1/3 of what I've replaced. I will shop quality, not price next time.
@mcnuggetapple Oh really, Mr. Know-it-all?! Before this new car hit 160k miles, I replaced the racknpinion, fuel pump, water pump, a/c compressor, power steering pump, electronic ignition computer system, starter relay switches, and replaced the radiator, not to mention regular maintenance. I don't need a receipt to know Toyota and Honda owners don't replace those items until well after 200k miles. The car now has 250k miles. GM quality could never compare to Japanese import quality. Just ask any mechanic. I've changed the oil every 3,500 miles, and flushed the tranny every 50k, religiously! That's why it's at 250k. I know how to take care of my vehicle. I can't repair poor quality. 😊
The 2024 equinox with the same engine but more torque and fwd had 28 mpg combined and 31 highway. The 2025 has the same engine, less torque, fwd and only 27 mpg combined and 28 highway! Backward progress, way to go GM! No thanks on this offering!
So it sounds like the engine isn't that powerful, but it still will get less gas mileage than the Rav4, that doesn't make sense. I would think it would get better gas mileage.
I recently leased a '25 Trax and would have gone for an Equinox had it been in my budget. That said, I also traded in a '23 Ford for the Trax, and by no means was it really a step down. The fit and finish of the Trax is better, the features it came with, while part of two option packages, were on par in cost with the Ford yet brought more advanced features for thousands less. It also rides better, the interior is more comfortable, and feels to be better quality despite both models being among the cheapest offerings. Would I be worried about the output ratings of the 1.5L engine: No! As my father always said, gearing can make a world of difference, even with less power. In the trax with a smaller engine, the tiny 1.2L turbo moves it quite well -- yes, it's not a speedster, but in daily life, unless you tend to drive like a complete idiot, where can you responsibly drive a vehicle at full output continually? I suspect gm did the same thing here, geared it for daily driving situations, not trips to the racetrack. For most people who are honest, this will be completely fine for 95% of their driving. Yes, I'd love to see the 2.0L turbo from the Cobalt/HHR SS as an option, but in a world where EPA standards highly influence production, I sadly suspect those days are all but gone. Sure, a hybrid option which could enhance off the line acceleration and around town efficiency would still be a nice choice to have too.
Yea it’s still trash , enjoy that low quality at it finest 😂 the trax is so slow idk how you can daily it when you can’t even get up to 60 without going the movement speeds as a 90s Corolla so idk what you mean driving liking a idiot 😂 Just go get your Toyota already and stop playing around with low quality lol
@@cormaro13 Well, I 've worked at a number of Japanese brand dealers and can attest they're not all as great as you may think, and would have cost me more for what I've gotten with my lease.
@@tadinator1362 still better than a trax that’s underpowered , old parts and daewood made ( my bad still made in the same factory as those were built ) 😂 and already has a bad history , I already played with Chevy , needed too many repairs in such short periods , wasn’t worth the cost , for the Japanese counter part , it didn’t need anything but oil and tires , if you choose the right model it goes a long way not the turbos tho lol There’s a reason they’re just giving them out with the leasing incentives 😆
@@cormaro13 Underpowered is based on perspective. I don't find an issue with its performance at all. For my commute, which includes expressway driving it's done just fine. I'm in it for three years, and it's under warranty the entire time. I'm not really concerned. My family has owned plenty of Korean made vehicles, even when people claimed they weren't any good, and none of them had a major issues; no engine, transmission, brake, accessories, nothing; and my father put over 100k on every one of them he owned.
Awd on equinox has been traditionally 70% power to front n 30% rear power.! Toyota RAV4 awd starts at $31240. Non turbo with more power in Toyota.? So no, Chevy is more for less!
GM doesn’t realize this segment is entirely based on MPG. People don’t care about sportiness or acceleration. It’s a useful box on wheels designed to move kids and crap reliably. You either be the MPG leader or you give huge discounts from the factory.
I have the 2022 RS and mpg is very good compared to what we had before a Jeep Cherokee night and day mileage. I think with the 8 speed this 1.5 will be class leading in MPG.
This new equinox will never be a success with the price they’re asking unless they give us at least a 2.0L with at least 200 hp. They want too much for what it has to offer.
Looks good, but it's still a Chevy and you'll be in the shop every single year after the 3rd year of ownership, and in those first 3 years you'll deal with constant electrical or infotainment issues. There is a reason the majority of people don't buy these. Those that do are either Chevy loyalists, or those that can't justify paying the extra $ for a Toyota because they are short sighted.
@@Mr.BobbyBrown Yeah I have a 2022 Equinox with 20 million miles on it and it has negative issues (park an unreliable car next to it and that car becomes reliable). Of course, I'm just a rando on the internet and will never show you my car's pictures. But you should believe me!!
No hybrid? RIP GM. How are these companies still in business no way selling trucks can support all these crap cars they put out. US brands are so bad at making cars attractive why? I own a Escape PHEV.
The Equinox is the vehicle that Toyota is afraid to make! Grant it, it has a reliable reputation. However, the styling inside and out is subpar compared to this new Equinox. Toyota needs to bring the "fun" to their lineup. The competition is flexing their muscles hard. Truth be told, I didn't expect Chevy to do a 360 with their styling and technology. Now Chevy needs to add a performance trim with more hp and a hybrid option. That's where it falls short with the Rav4. Hopefully, Toyota will take notice and improve the next generation. And no half-stepping with feature content, like the CR-V. You still can't get ventilated seats, a 360 camera, HUD, a full digital dash, and most importantly, a panoramic sunroof! It's the only vehicle in its class (besides the Mazda CX-5) that don't offer a panoramic roof.
Dude, the current Rav4 came out about 5 or 6 years ago of course this is going to have more tech and features. Come back when the new generation comes out In about a year or so.
@@yissibiiyte Toyota and Honda are being too content. It's like they live in a bubble from the outside world. The tired excuse I get from loyalist consumers is get an Acura or Lexus to get those features. But why when their competition is already bringing luxury features and technology to their mainstream cars? I don't know about you, but as a consumer, I want feel "rich" getting in my vehicle, even if it's not a luxury car, not a rental fleet. It's like being forced to an arrange marriage. Husband/Wife is not going anywhere. But they are sure is ugly!
@@Tritonal92 It has been "refreshed" twice and still no improvements with technology. Toyota also needs to stop dragging their feet with their redesign. The new Rav4 will be debut as a 2026 model. This generation debuted in 2019. That's a long time, dude.
Congratulations Chevy builds another rental fleet vehicle. Any trim above the base model is outrageously priced. When you compare feature for feature there is WAAAYYY better value for your money available from Honda, Toyota, Mazda. Heck even the Koreans will kick this things A$$. Take into account GM reliability ratings, why would anyone give this thing a second look?! It might be a bit bigger than the above mentioned competitors, but what good is that when it doesn’t have enough power to get out of its own way?!
@@Natethegreat200c what’s sad is Chevy still being around lol , already own 3 of those pos and they weren’t great , nothing but constant repairs vs their Japanese counterpart, put me down for Japan every time , keep your trash please lol , life has been great since I got rid of my junk 😆
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Don’t let the power numbers fool you, I recently had a new terrain rental with the 1.5 turbo and it was surprisingly quick and fun to drive!
When empty yes. GM and others bases their mpg on empty cars. When you load them up is when you see the real deal. The 1.5 is a weak motor. I have a 2011 Terrain and tows more then these new equinox and terrains models and yes I tow a utility trailer all the time with mine. GM needs to put a 2.0 in these not the 1.5L. People often forget they are getting less for their money these days. What are you paying for? A bigger screen you don't need. Right....
Outside of that I do give credit to the designer for making good looking cars! Their power trains need to be revised big time!
@@carlostavaresjr958they sold the Terrain and Equinox with 2.0L turbos from 2018-2020 and they were actually really good. 252hp and 3500lb towing capacity. I don’t know what they stopped selling them. No one wanted them I guess
@JodyDWard Don't be silly! What the customer wants has absolutely nothing to do with GM's decision making! Lol
And I agree. I had a 2018 Terrain Denali with the 2.0 and it was much better than the current engine.
My 1.2 in my trax is so zippy when its just me but when I have a passenger or sometimes when I have it fully loaded with 5 people it gets sluggish.
The torque on that engine is higher than most of its competitors. That's why its peppy. GM did survey their customers and apparently their current Nox owners aren't concerned with its power. So they put more focus on driving comfort and tech features.
Yall do the best and most neutral honest reviews definitely my favorite reviews to watch. I hate the ones that act like sales men when reviewing
Welcome to Minnesota
Don’t you love paying 39,000 for 1.8 T with a CVT…….car prices are absolutely insane
No thanks lol. I'll grab a subaru next
Its not 39 grand for fwd. The loaded
@@robertsn6584still junk
Wish it had a 1.8 turbo. It's a 1.5 but that's what I have in mine and it's been good
EVERYTHING is too expensive now. Thanks to Bin Bin & KH
Thanks for the detailed review. My wife currently has a 2019 Equinox and thinking of upgrading in the spring to this exact version of the RS. I have a 2021 Trailblazer RS and love it! I'm about to check out your Activ video next.
It really doesn't look too bad. Nice improvements all the way around. I especially like the expanded storage under-cover above the spare. Nice place to put all that stuff you always leave in like a jump-pack, some bungies, etc. Better than the raised platform in the 4Runner.
Today forecast....
Bigger screens and smaller engines with a chance of turbocharger.
Engine is fine. 8 speed auto.I've got a 2025 RS. Niccce car!
The reason they dropped the 2.0 because sales were less than 15%.
I love the new looks and would only buy the AWD version because of the 8 speed transmission. It funny you guys can not talk about driving impressions yet since they are on dealer lots to buy.
Been watching random dealers post videos for weeks already
Yes true but not an RS model. Active I have seen but this is the second review of the RS but no driving of t yet
Enjoy that trash , plenty of issues on them already 😂
@@cormaro13 which issues? I have one and no issues.
@@IdoNomb it’s all over the forums , don’t worry the low quality takes a sec to come on lol
Only lower case gm could offer only ONE engine choice with CVT for FWD versions in one of their most high volume main stream mass market compact crossovers, which is absolutely ridiculous. Its missing a hybrid powertrain using a non turbo variant of its 2.0L engine, and a top end 2.0L turbo engine option. Otherwise its a very nice and attractive CUV that will standout in the marketplace, but one that will always be trailing the RAV4 and CRV because of its limited powertrain options. Now will lowercase gm lump both the ICE Equinox and Equinox EV sales together for bragging rights in the compact CUV segment? We'll see.
Good lookin’ truck. Nice review. Thx.
Less torque in FWD(only) version probably because the rubber band trans can't handle the higher torque.
Thank you for this Nathan. When will driving impressions be revealed? Kindly, Graham
Looks good ,,, lots of cool color combos
Great review and a nice lookin' vehicle!
Hey those instrumentation and infotainment screens are the same or bigger than my C8! Looks dang near interchangeable. What’s a $100k difference between friends.
Is the navigation system built-in, or do you need to use your phone or pay a separate subscription charge? If a separate charge how much is it?
Isnt the model Y the best selling car period?
Great refresh but a 1.5 is a non starter.
It definitely should have engine options like it had before 175hp gotta be gutless 😂
Needs 230 hp at least! Too big esp when you have people and gravel in the back.
@@grahamstefaan the vehicles body itself is eh ok, but the engine and transmission are trash.
@@billybobbob3003 new car and still can't compete with the old/ current Rav4 about to be redesigned. GM is lost.
@@grahamstefaan rav4 has always been too small compared to CRV, but powetrain in modern honda and gm vehicles suck. screw turbos and cvt.
They should put the 2.0L I4 the same as the envision in it
What game? Reliability? 🫢
Unless GM is hiding a hybrid model and just waiting to unveil it at the most dramatic moment, the RAV4 and CRV will still be eating this alive on the sales charts. Hell, even the Tucson and Sportage are taking away sales from the Equinox
@Jamal-ub1ko hybrid can be skipped just go with the BEV - much better vehicle.
I love the fact that a spare tire is included!
I had the old Equinox as a rental and couldn’t wait to get out of it. The seats were horribly uncomfortable, it handled like a pig and was harsh and noisy. This thing better be much improved for nearly $40k for a base model. That sounds crazy. I would much rather have a Mazda CX-50 with a bulletproof non-turbo, AWD, and automatic for $5k less.
The title of your video led me to believe they might be offering a hybrid, which might have been remotely interested. I had a 2013 Volt which was a good car. Once again, it seems GM engineers had a great idea that the management and beancounters killed off and let the competition take the market.
I have to agree here. The engines are weak sauce in these!
Every time I drive a GM product, i can't wait to get out of it!
So what is missing for the top line trim RS doesn’t have any front parking sensors. Wow 😢
Ah man Nathan you were close to my house. Need meet and greets.
GM is nailing it in the design department with these new cars! I'm not impressed with the powertrains. I tow with my 2011 terrain and it tows more then these new equinoxes and terrains. Those engines need to be revised!
2011? Wasnt that the 2.4 liter engines than drank oil like a pig?? A common problem with those engines. Also, the gas mileage was awful on those. My work car was a 2020 Equinox, and I got about 35 mpgs, and turned the car in with 210,000 miles. It ran like a champ. It was under powered, but thats what people want with a coring car like this. Its nothing more than a fleet vehicle/grocery getter/soccer mom car.
I like the new equinox it's one of the few crossover that I buy
U must enjoy that low quality extra good then 😂
Agreed with all. If these had a 200 hp engine they would outsell or at least compete with Toyota because it looks great. Toyota now with the 225 hp hybrid. Big difference. Come on GM. People want to love you. Let them.
The RAV4 hit it out of the park when it went to a Hybrid option. Can’t keep them on the lot and it’s a year wait to get one.
Screw them.
@@HALWG51nothing wrong with them fool , sorry the better company is ahead 😂
Great video, gonna go buy the rav4 now
This doesn't seem ideal for towing OR off-roading. What does this excel at? Just being an affordable, stylish family vehicle?
If they all have the same screen size and you want to save money. Buy a base model, add some katzkin leather, then add some wheels of your choice if your into that kind of thing.
Who would want this trash 😂
Does it come with no oil in it and bald tries?or is that just every other equinox?
I do not understand why there is not much mpg difference between 1.5 li, 2 li and 2.5 li engines. Or maybe that has nothing to do with mpgs
Pricing is high when optioned out your looking high 30's to 40's. I looked at one it listed right at 40 thousand dollars.
2.0 needs to return. 1.5 struggles when going uphill and it lacks a lot of excitement.
Test drove and turned around a few miles down the road. Engine and CVT are horrible. Fit and finish is bad. AC sounded weird, can’t explain. Buttons for it are hard to see too.
GM needs to put the 2.0 back in it. That 1.5 is an absolute dog. Also the red interior accents are a deal breaker. Chevy has gone so far but once again just can’t finish 🤦♂️
Not everyone wants a speed rocket SUV. And don't buy the RS if you don't like the red accents.
Black and gray interiors are boring .
@@lcann251 I have a 1.5 and don’t need a rocket but it would be nice if the car could get out of its own way. Also they didn’t specify but all the new Traverse’s have red accents regardless of the trim level.
Yea I test drove a 2021 model with the 2.0t I punched it them tires was screaming
I agree. It should be an option on the 2-RS & standard on the top Activ
The power sucks! My 2016 has over 300hp 6.
What are the GM cousins of this car?
If I had to choose between the two, yeah I'd definitely take this over the RAV4.
Looks good but not great mpg's.
So you're saying...the Diesel ⛽ is gone?
Open the hood and looks like the same vehicle from 15 years ago.
So almost 40k for a rental car special got it
I want to see different colors.
I would rather have a larger normally aspirated engine than a small engine that relies on its turbocharger to carry the vehicle. That poor engine is going to be under strain all the time (especially in high altitude driving)
They should’ve stayed with the regular AT transmission😂
The Kia Sportage is up there with top sales too
A Kia 😂
Mini Traverse 😍
Sharp looking vehicle
No, chevy didn''t beat toyota, the Rav4 is a much more reliable and durable vehicle. GM is going the wrong direction in quality
The 1.5 turbo is also a reliable engine...
It is a handsome refresh, but GM can't come close to Toyota's reliability. How many components will a GM owner replace in 10-15 years with 200k plus miles compared to a Toyota? My last new vehicle was a GM. It's 15 years old w/250k mile, and Toyota and Honda comparables haven't had to replace a 1/3 of what I've replaced. I will shop quality, not price next time.
That’s a goddamn lie, did Toyota owners show you their receipts? I guarantee you a car with mileage that high has needed a lot of maintenance
@mcnuggetapple Oh really, Mr. Know-it-all?! Before this new car hit 160k miles, I replaced the racknpinion, fuel pump, water pump, a/c compressor, power steering pump, electronic ignition computer system, starter relay switches, and replaced the radiator, not to mention regular maintenance. I don't need a receipt to know Toyota and Honda owners don't replace those items until well after 200k miles. The car now has 250k miles. GM quality could never compare to Japanese import quality. Just ask any mechanic. I've changed the oil every 3,500 miles, and flushed the tranny every 50k, religiously! That's why it's at 250k. I know how to take care of my vehicle. I can't repair poor quality. 😊
@@mcnuggetapplecan’t repair your low iq and poor quality sorry fool 😂
1.5? Are you kidding me! That’s too powerful! We need a 1.0 with 2 cylinders- not 4!
The 2024 equinox with the same engine but more torque and fwd had 28 mpg combined and 31 highway. The 2025 has the same engine, less torque, fwd and only 27 mpg combined and 28 highway! Backward progress, way to go GM! No thanks on this offering!
So it sounds like the engine isn't that powerful, but it still will get less gas mileage than the Rav4, that doesn't make sense. I would think it would get better gas mileage.
1:46 id say rogue
I recently leased a '25 Trax and would have gone for an Equinox had it been in my budget. That said, I also traded in a '23 Ford for the Trax, and by no means was it really a step down. The fit and finish of the Trax is better, the features it came with, while part of two option packages, were on par in cost with the Ford yet brought more advanced features for thousands less. It also rides better, the interior is more comfortable, and feels to be better quality despite both models being among the cheapest offerings.
Would I be worried about the output ratings of the 1.5L engine: No! As my father always said, gearing can make a world of difference, even with less power. In the trax with a smaller engine, the tiny 1.2L turbo moves it quite well -- yes, it's not a speedster, but in daily life, unless you tend to drive like a complete idiot, where can you responsibly drive a vehicle at full output continually? I suspect gm did the same thing here, geared it for daily driving situations, not trips to the racetrack. For most people who are honest, this will be completely fine for 95% of their driving. Yes, I'd love to see the 2.0L turbo from the Cobalt/HHR SS as an option, but in a world where EPA standards highly influence production, I sadly suspect those days are all but gone. Sure, a hybrid option which could enhance off the line acceleration and around town efficiency would still be a nice choice to have too.
Yea it’s still trash , enjoy that low quality at it finest 😂 the trax is so slow idk how you can daily it when you can’t even get up to 60 without going the movement speeds as a 90s Corolla so idk what you mean driving liking a idiot 😂
Just go get your Toyota already and stop playing around with low quality lol
Would’ve gotten way more features from Japan brand but good job researching and get the cheapest trash 😂
@@cormaro13 Well, I 've worked at a number of Japanese brand dealers and can attest they're not all as great as you may think, and would have cost me more for what I've gotten with my lease.
@@tadinator1362 still better than a trax that’s underpowered , old parts and daewood made ( my bad still made in the same factory as those were built ) 😂 and already has a bad history , I already played with Chevy , needed too many repairs in such short periods , wasn’t worth the cost , for the Japanese counter part , it didn’t need anything but oil and tires , if you choose the right model it goes a long way not the turbos tho lol
There’s a reason they’re just giving them out with the leasing incentives 😆
@@cormaro13 Underpowered is based on perspective. I don't find an issue with its performance at all. For my commute, which includes expressway driving it's done just fine. I'm in it for three years, and it's under warranty the entire time. I'm not really concerned. My family has owned plenty of Korean made vehicles, even when people claimed they weren't any good, and none of them had a major issues; no engine, transmission, brake, accessories, nothing; and my father put over 100k on every one of them he owned.
Like this vehicle design now just drop the v6 engine in it ?, to finish it off . job done.
Looks good but as usual from GM it is seriously under powered.
If it doesn't have a hybrid version then not really
Reminds me of a police car.
I don’t think 1.8 is enough for the price rather just get trax at that point
Enjoy that slow trash 😂
It's so easy to beat Toyota anyway.
Government Motors
Why it kind of looks like they Nissan pathfinder
For those who like Toyotas and said Toyotas last 4ever...Why don't you buy a 2010 Corolla with 200,000 miles...you have 300,000 more to run
They do constantly 😂
GM needs to put the 2.0 back in it. That 1.5 is an absolute dog.
Totally agreed here. They nail the design but the powertrains are weak!
Awd on equinox has been traditionally 70% power to front n 30% rear power.! Toyota RAV4 awd starts at $31240. Non turbo with more power in Toyota.? So no, Chevy is more for less!
1.5 liter engine, are you kidding??
errors on your sunroof and 2 tone paint comments
The engine needs an upgrade.
The GMC Terrain loos better.
Toyota is still the goat. You can polish a turd all you want but its still a turd.
Toyota interior looks like turd
@@dioralcide8490 I'd rather my vehicle just work than looking like a space ship. Hence why Toyota is goat.
@@dioralcide8490can look trashy all it wants still light years ahead on gm for reliability😂
He says front weird.
Mpgs
1.5 engine ? Pass…
Everything is nice but the motor.
GM doesn’t realize this segment is entirely based on MPG. People don’t care about sportiness or acceleration. It’s a useful box on wheels designed to move kids and crap reliably. You either be the MPG leader or you give huge discounts from the factory.
I have the 2022 RS and mpg is very good compared to what we had before a Jeep Cherokee night and day mileage. I think with the 8 speed this 1.5 will be class leading in MPG.
questionable reliability IMO....will be the deciding factor.
This new equinox will never be a success with the price they’re asking unless they give us at least a 2.0L with at least 200 hp. They want too much for what it has to offer.
Definitely not! Toyota will outlast that all day long!
Anemic engine!
Looks good, but it's still a Chevy and you'll be in the shop every single year after the 3rd year of ownership, and in those first 3 years you'll deal with constant electrical or infotainment issues. There is a reason the majority of people don't buy these. Those that do are either Chevy loyalists, or those that can't justify paying the extra $ for a Toyota because they are short sighted.
You're talking bull shit bro, I have one from 2019 and it hasn't given me any problems, they are very good.
We have a 2017 and 180k miles later no issues that you speak of
It still a toyota with a dumpster looking like interior
@@carlosovni7100 That's good to hear. Everyone I know that has one has had non-stop issues.
@@Mr.BobbyBrown Yeah I have a 2022 Equinox with 20 million miles on it and it has negative issues (park an unreliable car next to it and that car becomes reliable). Of course, I'm just a rando on the internet and will never show you my car's pictures. But you should believe me!!
GM build quality with a CVT... how about HELLZ NO.
It also comes without cvt if you get awd
The tiny weak engine doesn't match with the brawny look.
No hybrid? RIP GM. How are these companies still in business no way selling trucks can support all these crap cars they put out. US brands are so bad at making cars attractive why? I own a Escape PHEV.
Kinda ugly like Tesla. Companies need to stop putting turbos in. Way too expensive to fix
It’s barely new, not mostly new. ZERO hybrid. Hard pass!
Nope
Chevy junk comparing with a toyota rav4. Thats laughable.
Lease. Never buy.
Why
The Equinox is the vehicle that Toyota is afraid to make! Grant it, it has a reliable reputation. However, the styling inside and out is subpar compared to this new Equinox. Toyota needs to bring the "fun" to their lineup. The competition is flexing their muscles hard. Truth be told, I didn't expect Chevy to do a 360 with their styling and technology. Now Chevy needs to add a performance trim with more hp and a hybrid option. That's where it falls short with the Rav4. Hopefully, Toyota will take notice and improve the next generation. And no half-stepping with feature content, like the CR-V. You still can't get ventilated seats, a 360 camera, HUD, a full digital dash, and most importantly, a panoramic sunroof! It's the only vehicle in its class (besides the Mazda CX-5) that don't offer a panoramic roof.
Well said. Toyota are seriously lagging behind the competition and "reliability" isn't an excuse.
Dude, the current Rav4 came out about 5 or 6 years ago of course this is going to have more tech and features. Come back when the new generation comes out In about a year or so.
@@yissibiiyte Toyota and Honda are being too content. It's like they live in a bubble from the outside world. The tired excuse I get from loyalist consumers is get an Acura or Lexus to get those features. But why when their competition is already bringing luxury features and technology to their mainstream cars? I don't know about you, but as a consumer, I want feel "rich" getting in my vehicle, even if it's not a luxury car, not a rental fleet. It's like being forced to an arrange marriage. Husband/Wife is not going anywhere. But they are sure is ugly!
@@Tritonal92 It has been "refreshed" twice and still no improvements with technology. Toyota also needs to stop dragging their feet with their redesign. The new Rav4 will be debut as a 2026 model. This generation debuted in 2019. That's a long time, dude.
@jraheemjefcoat429 they don't have to rush the redesign yet because they are still selling like hot cakes lol.
Way Over-designed front End Is BUTT UGLY!!
lol no it’s just a prettier piece of garbage. Face it, you only buy this if you can’t afford the Toyota
Junk. As usual from GM
Congratulations Chevy builds another rental fleet vehicle. Any trim above the base model is outrageously priced. When you compare feature for feature there is WAAAYYY better value for your money available from Honda, Toyota, Mazda. Heck even the Koreans will kick this things A$$. Take into account GM reliability ratings, why would anyone give this thing a second look?! It might be a bit bigger than the above mentioned competitors, but what good is that when it doesn’t have enough power to get out of its own way?!
Garbage engine, rather get a hybrid with double the mpg for $39K.
Junk
Chevy chinese quality ? Better to buy a used toyota
A mechanic once told me these are throw away vehicles, never buy them over Toyota.
Gullible men 😩
@@Natethegreat200cnot really gullible just know what good quality looks like 😂
@@cormaro13 or what people tell you it is. lol. It’s sad
@@Natethegreat200c what’s sad is Chevy still being around lol , already own 3 of those pos and they weren’t great , nothing but constant repairs vs their Japanese counterpart, put me down for Japan every time , keep your trash please lol , life has been great since I got rid of my junk 😆