Alex Jones's InfoWars Store Generated Over $165M Revenue In 3 Years
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 июл 2022
- InfoWars producer Daria Karpova testified that the InfoWars online store generated over $165 million in revenue in three years. The store sold supplements and "prepper" gear, among other items to customers.
#AlexJones #InfoWars #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
I thought Infowars didn't cooperate and provide requested information. So they were defaulted. But the truth is they provided more than any defamation defendant in history. Show trial. Hope the jury sees thru it
And you know that how? What were they requested to provide and what did they provide?
@@LSmallCatL it's just some random scumbag that's defending some of the most disgusting actions possible. He's probably one of the many psycho fans that feel the need to harass the parents.
@@LSmallCatL because The evidence was “admitted into evidence PRE-TRaiAL” you did hear that RIGHT? Genius’ everywhere 😳
@@bostonplace2314 I think the issue is what evidence was admitted pre-trial. You can submit 50,000 documents, but if they are not the required ones, it is still a violation of discovery. Did they provide sources for the videos? Were they able to speak on finances during discovery? Did they turn over all of the information they had on the plaintiffs? In a legal setting, for better or for worse, those are all hurdles Infowars needed to clear.
LOL at you dumbos here who haven’t a clue as to how our Nation’s judicial system functions, how evidentiary hearings are conducted, and how pre-trial discovery is conducted. You don’t need to be a lawyer to learn the basics of trial law.
He was right about the frogs. Never forget lol
Not even that. It wasn't a government coverup. The company was hiding the harmful effects of their runoff, the government stepped in to make them clean it up.
it actually is true
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣therex a really gunny fb meme of him shooting lightning bolts from his hands while hes fighting to protect the last 2 straight frogs 🐸. Man i wish i could have posted the meme in the comment do u could have seen it.
he is right about most things
REVENUE. To get profit you need to subtract all costs and expenses.
Did you hear how cocky the judge was after hearing those numbers too?
it still had to be a huge sum of money
And taxes.
@@Uprising771
Ye
@@cryptotex420 time stamp….
The legal system is a sick joke.
Your seeing it used as a weapon. All you and I can do is better than these people. Remember that. I'm glad you don't like what you see. Neither do I.
You only think that in this case because the legal system isn't doing what you want it to. If you actually followed this trial, you would see one of the instances where the legal process worked incredibly well.
@@robingraves2682 You don't know what you're talking about.
@@GregSiekman what is the proper response of the court here, in your opinion?
If Alex’s claims affected the lives of the plaintiffs in a profoundly negative way, don’t they deserve a chance to meet him in court? I am curious to know what your boundaries of speech and defamation are.
This is one of those cases where the outcome reflected justice. Ideally, Jones would never have gone after those grieving families, but at least they managed to hold him accountable for harrassing them so cruely.
Revenue and profit are two very different things.
so are truth and lies.
So are liars and victims. May the families get all past AND future earnings
@@bjkarana
absolutely true statement👍
@@Changeiscoming47 lol. sure.
@@Changeiscoming47 for lying? Lol
How many employees and 1099 contractors did Alex employ? How much money does it cost to host millions of views per week on your own servers because you've been blacklisted off the internet?
Hope he pays every dime and rottens in prison.
Exactly. Probably at least 2/3’s or more of what they brought in.
@Grant Kirtz if he had a studio, producers, editors and production crew would include insurance, healthcare insurance, lawyers and accountants etc. it’s like asking CNN what it made for it’s fake news then stating that Jeff Zucker made all that money for himself.
@Grant Kirtz divided by 3 years and it still insanely high 🤣
@Grant Kirtz that’s gross revenue.
The Operating Cost of Infowars is more than most businesses could dream of having in revenue. It costs a lot of money to operate as a standalone platform free entity.
Exactly.
Revenue is not profit.
Esp when the content is so disgusting that you haven't had a big sponsor in a decade.
Especially when you're funneling money to the 3 percenters and Roger Stone and whoever else
And why do we give a fk’n hoot about Infowars’ operating cost?
@@wtcashel so that we know how much money he should pay to the people that you used so that he can make all that money
Please increase the audio on these. It's difficult to hear when there's any background noise even with my headset.
so increase the background noise as well? do you want to invest in DVD rewinders I'm looking for 05 iq's who lack intelligence to back my scam
You can install an app on your browser to level the sound. Not sure how to eradicate the chokearoach commenting here though...
Just wait for the judges show trial documentary.
@@cosmological7773 Conservatives hate courts of law because they get caught lying.
Fact: Infowars generated $165mm+ in REVENUE in 3 years.
AJ Fans: "Revenue isn't profit!" "It's not illegal to make a money in America!"
Non AJ Fans: No one in the video suggests that revenue = profit.
AJ Fans: "Revenue isn't profit!"
Non AJ Fans: uh, this might be a "you" problem.
Stating the revenue instead of the profit is manipulative. The point of the trial is how much he has profited and how much he owes.
It's a real organic grassroots movement 😆
@@chasmurphy1227 this.
God they’re so annoying
@@chasmurphy1227 manipulative, sort of like promoting a single nut job's conspiracy theory about Sandy Hook as a
mainstream" opinion?
A company's revenue says nothing about the amount pocketed, if any at all. A company can have $160M in revenue and have negative earnings.
@Grant Kirtz how do you know that?
@@Eggpicker Year, not month.
@Grant Kirtz You have absolutely no idea what the cost of bandwidth is. You need to remember that alex jones was blacklisted off the face of the internet and has to stream high definition footage to hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of people across the world using his OWN servers and OWN bandwidth. This is not a cheap thing to do. Do everyone a favor and do some research before making bs claims.
Do you really think he spent 165 million on coffee mugs and bumper stickers? He obviously had operating costs but his net was probably still massive. It's funny because if these people did any actual preparation she could have answered and clarified what the actual number was. Or more likely she knew the actual number but clarifying "oh no we only made 120 of that 165" sounds worse than letting people just guess.
@@Eggpicker Owen said he gets payed $120000 a year. so Alex likes to pay his talent well. that doesn't mean at all that he has 160 mil profit, its all expenditure.
who cares how much they made? hes allowed to make money in americaXD clown court
For sure 👍 Agree 💯
Revenue and profit are two entirely different things. How much of that $165 million was spent on salaries of the employees, resupplying products, shipping, production costs for the show, lawyer fees, security details, building rent, and other operating costs? Unless you juxtapose those two things you really aren't making a substantive argument. NBC generated a revenue over three years of $108.9 Billion. After all of their liabilities, the actual profit is $13 billion. So what should be deduced about NBC knowing that information? What exactly is it that the Prosecution is insinuating?
People don't realize how big Infowars is. Also, why do libtards think it's a crime to produce revenue?
THIS IS NOT A CRIMINAL TRIAL. Get your terminology straight.
Simple. The prosecution is lying. That's all they do. That's literally all they have.
Excellent analysis. Hopefully people take notes!
@@jamilamalluf7160 So...what you are saying is, that ASlex Jones runs an infomercial? Hole. Digging!
They wanna convince the jury he has the monie to pay up🤣
And he does
@@greenearthblueskies8556 150 million dollars?
He does. Have you been on the ground crew when his private jet wheels up?
He does.
Just wondering...do you know why he jumped up and left during this woman's testimony? Bathroom break? I guess he is struggling big time~
@@sonybell6774 yep days of hundreds of thousands of dollars add up in a year or 10
165M? That barely covers their operations, considering the manufacturing cost of their products and looking at how much more other supplement suppliers ask for the same or inferior formulas.
haha
😂😂😂😂😂😂
How much did you buy?
People like to troll him for selling supplements but they're legit. The winter sun vitamin d/k is great.
@@hellooutsiders6865 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
he went outside to scream something. its an uncontrollable habit for him.
No he didnt but try again snowflake
Does he have tourettes?
Why is he allowed to get up
And just leave?
He was just giving a sasquatch call.
@@lovepet4565 I just saw this.
Wtf
Alex is more honest then all media
Hahaha worms for brain
That’s a lot of money if you don’t have any expenses…..something tells me that is not the case.
the products had a cost of manufacture, transport, storage, picking packing, warehouse staff costs, advert video costs, people processing the online orders, credit costs, building costs, insurance, rates, water, electric, heating................................revenue is NOT profit.
@@cresshead it’s a drop-ship business. The products are private-labeled for Infowars by 3rd party manufacturers who make and direct ship them to his customers. It’s a wildly profitable business model for Alex. The guy is a savvy businessman. Credit where credit is due.
Who cares if he has overhead he just use the overhead to harass these people even more
@@russhall1414 was fined 4million today
@@cresshead all right! And it's just the first case!
"Revenue" is before salaries x50+, hugely expensive server costs, product packaging & labeling & production costs, studio equipment, software, electricity, taxes, etc. Why didn't they state the actual NET profit?
Why should they? This is the plaintiff’s attorney. The defense can do as you say on cross examination or when they present their defense.
@@gizmo5601 But they are only showing clips the prosecution on some of these channels on the web to make it look like he has no defense.
@@ianwilkinson5069 The original comment was attached to the plaintiff’s questioning. So, no, “they” didn’t have to state the actual profit. I’m sure there will be comprehensive coverage of the defense as it is presented. And, look forward to hearing the juries verdict re damages too.
@@gizmo5601 "Why should they?" Err, maybe because it would be more accurate and less misleading?!
@@MarekzAnglii Because the plaintiff attorney has a duty to put forward the strongest case for his client. It’s for the defense attorney to present arguments against the plaintiff’s case. Neither attorney is there to present a balanced view. It’s a battle. The jury decide the merits of the arguments. Do you not understand this is adversarial US civil litigation?
Disgusting how they manipulate then jury.
Revenue is not profit.
Reminder; defamation and libel aren't free.
'We've got a hate speech artist here - must be a loser nerd,
trying to justify BEING a total Loser,
instead of FACING his total weakness and overcoming it.
Don't worry - it's COMING for you anyway!
You know who they should be suing? Newtown PD and CT State Police. They were in that building for at least 17 minutes before any alarms were ever rang about multiple victims and it wasn't even them that said anything. There were 4 officers in Room 10 when they announced a suspect down and said nothing about 7 other victims. And Penna was in room 8 when he inquired about the suspect down, using his radio twice and said nothing about the 17 victims that were there. He then used his radio again, discussing weapons, still nothing. Meanwhile, several of the victims sustained survivable wounds and were bleeding out to death as a result of their negligence.
How many kids bled out in 17 minutes? It's my understanding bleeding out is the biggest danger and why not just minutes but seconds matter in a mass shooting. How many Uvalde kids would be alive if the had not been abandoned?
@@mirandastephens4586 Unfortunately we were never given the number. There was a group called The Hartford Consensus that went over all the autopsies etc. When they published their findings they did not give specifics, but did use the word "majority" in reference to all 26 victims. As a result of their study, the began a program called "stop the bleed", if you ever want to check them out.
Uvalde is... well... there's no words. I mean, I thought the response to Sandy Hook was horrible. Uvalde was like "hold my beer".
Big difference from generated and profit. “Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.” - Abraham Lincoln
not a big difference from generating profits though...
Reference comes from the Bible the book of proverbs but still as potent
Google auto deletes any attempt to show people the infamous Robby Parker video
@Maskie Man It's still on RUclips but they won't let me post the link or the name of the video no matter how I alter it.
very true but to be fair they will delete any comment with a link in it, unless the channel owner approves that link.
Which means he's got the money to pay up!
do you know the difference between revenue and profit? Also, his assets are all in his parents name and always have been. So good luck.
@@mirandastephens4586 don't worry, they are ways to pierce through an obvious shield like that
Why would he though? He was mostly right
So you don't know the difference between profit and revenue or about the reach of bankruptcy court 😁
@@roninski3638 nah he wasn't. He convinced sheep like you though. Sad.
3:33 $165 mm for 3 years = $55 mm per year. Consider $1 mm/ month to produce the show (est. including salaries, expenses, PP&E) = ($55mm - $12mm) = $43 mm Profit per Year.
That $129 million dollars in profit in only three years.....much of it on the backs of dead children.
his internet service is over 1m a year, and how did he make money off the backs of dead kids... you think everyone who watches his show or buys his supplements etc did it because of his sandy hook comments? that doesn't even make sense... yet that's what you are alleging ? really ?
@@HOTRODRICO Excellent! By all means...please provide me with your calculations for InfoWars monthly revenues/ expenses/ profits. Also...it is absolutely possible to calculate how much of InfoWars' revenue is a function of viewers drawn to IW content because of their interest in Sandy Hook. Of course, IW's blatant refusal to provide that viewership data is one of the many reasons AJ lost by default. 🙂
Alex Jones producer was a Russian agent lmaoo
How he talks to her in the beginning because she didn’t remember lol
So what is the point. He paid taxes on the money he made.
The point is to establish the amount of money that can be taken from him.
Alex Jones' followers are some of the slowest individuals ever lol
I GUARANTEE 90% of people don't even know the difference between gross and profit, including the makers of this video (lawyer is lying, of course).
Not sure you do either. Dude - any simpleton who takes a Business 101 class learns how to read an income statement.
Btw, to make your point properly, you are looking for the term “net income”.
@@HKim0072 Profit and net income are the same thing. Ha ha. Wow. Good stuff.
@@robotron17 Dude - it's not. Literally, they are different lines on the income statement. Profit only refers to Revenue - COGS.
I f-ing did this for a living in the past.
@@HKim0072 Investopedia: "Revenue is the total amount of income generated by the sale of goods or services related to the company's primary operations. *Revenue, also known as gross sales,* is often referred to as the "top line" because it sits at the top of the income statement. Income, or *net income, is a company's total earnings or PROFIT.* When investors and analysts speak of a company's income, they're actually referring to net income or the profit for the company.."
Like I said, net income is profit - same thing - same line. Revenue/gross ... same thing. I just don't even know what to tell you. Dictionaries and investopedia are on my side.
the dude is lost in his own dumbness.
Should I deflect with a revenue/ profit argument so we forget we're talking about blood money?
BS.
So happy how many people are standing for freedom in the comments
Hahaha worms for brain
That's how shows work, they have sponsors and sell thier products lol had nothing to do with anything.
They are their own sponsors. Pretty soon, you'll hear about a $50 million dollar " debt" that wad actually from a trust in Alex's name and his parents'. He is in debt to himself and that really doesn't mean anything at all. He tried to stall with that tactic during depositions.
I can’t stand watching this, Alex Jones is harmless, this judge should be kicked off the bench and disbarred
people don't seem to understand, yes revenue is not net profit, but showing this is not what that's for. showing that 165 mil in 3 years is to show to Alex generated income from spreading misinformation, not to justify how much he's being sued for.
Seriously. We know how net works. This isn't about net, it's about, as you say, the basic idea that they are making money off of peddling the kinds of conspiracy theories that draw people into their sales funnel. You can't buy products from Evil Globalists, you have to buy them from Alex.
So should All media be sued? By these standards, the mainstream media constantly lies and pushes out misinformation constantly, and make millions of dollars doing so.🤔🤷🏻♀️ Ijs
@@sarahjane9692 Go ahead and sue any media company that has defamed you! That's the civil remedy.
Misinformation to you could be actual information to another person, its just another way for people to harm the right to free speech. Usually news media are the ones spreading misinformation, that's why people are so hungry for truth and look at people like Alex.
just because he made money, doesn't mean it was due to misinformation. we could easily make the same assumptions about any other media outlet.
I’m in the wrong profession/business!
Good for him
Yea and he actually spent 160 million acquiring the products
The defense doesnt have those receipts though, do they?
Good for him.
there are idiots who will throw money at anyone screaming conspiracy nonsense. amazin!
Have fun in the NWO.
Alex Jones is the greatest snake oil salesman of all time.
So you have a calcified pineal gland - CONGRATS!
No wonder you're SO LOST!!!!
fans buy the products to support him.. we love him. As you can see, he has a lot of support.
Gore pushed the biggest fraud ever put on humanity. Alex is great
*Regardless of your own opinion - ultimately, Alex will win upon appeal, for two reasons. (1) The lawsuit should have never gone forward in the first place because it was actually filed well past the Texas statute of limitations for defamation - which is ONE YEAR. See the Latin legal phrase "void ab initio". (2) The plaintiffs never sought out any pre-trial remedy before suing - such as legally demanding a public retraction and apology on video and in print - as is required under Texas law in order for a case like this to move forward.*
@@1984WillC doesn't change the fact that he defamed families of murder victims and others in the community to sell those products to his audience. The fact that you're ok with that says a lot, and none of it is positive.
What was the actual profit?
$19.84
4.20 dollars
*Ultimately, Alex will win upon appeal, for two reasons. (1) The lawsuit should have never gone forward in the first place because it was actually filed well past the Texas statute of limitations for defamation - which is ONE YEAR. See the Latin legal phrase "void ab initio". (2) The plaintiffs never sought out any pre-trial remedy before suing - such as legally demanding a public retraction and apology on video and in print - as is required under Texas law in order for a case like this to move forward.*
Correct
Then I'm confused why this trial is even happening right now.
If the defamation occured in 2013 and they had one year to file but didn't do that in time by 2014, then why is this happening?
Excuse my ignorance
@@jockejocke1 *Answer: Corrupt Judges.*
@@jockejocke1 the clip they showed was played in 2017
So that could be why, but I have no idea when they first filed. If it was 2018 or not. Not too sure. Just trying to catch up now on the testimony
@@AnalysisofaCrimewithCD *They have been showing clips dating back to the day/week/month of Sandy Hook.*
This lawyer's questioning is like a breath of fresh air - all to the point, no rambling, no pauses for slow scribbles. I know charisma is not evidence of being right but I have to wonder if that's just the baseline for lawyers and the contrast between this one and jones's one is that no serious lawyer would represent infowars so jones hired... Well, weve all seen him in action
For those repeating revenue vs profits his claim is that the fine will bankrupt him but bankruptcy usually means you let cost are more then you are capable of paying. Buy cutting his expenses(firing he can still meet the fine
I hope he appeals it and doesn't have to pay a dime
He can't pay billions of dollars bro
Good, he can afford a very guilty verdict. He'll be back to warning us Soviet leprechauns in sombreros in no time. No need to hold back.
Civil court. No guilty verdicts.
@@FirstNameLastName-wt5to Thats also part of civil trials. That's why Amber Heard was found guilty.
@@TheeJosephSantos No. They found in favor of the party. Not the same.
@@FirstNameLastName-wt5to The court read aloud the word "guilty" 12 times.
@@TheeJosephSantos There’s no guilt to be determined. That’s not how it works technically. This whole thing is a show.
What am I missing? Are they barred from creating revenue? I wonder what kind of revenue Amazon or Apple generated over the same time frame 🤷♂️
Lol.
The lying prosecution is trying to confuse revenue and profit to falsely suggest that AJ made huge profits off of Sandy Hook, and is loaded.
This court proceeding is to decide how much Alex has to pay in restitution. They have already found him responsible.
They’re seeking like 150m in damages so probably trying establish he’s rich or something.
Because he is already found liable? And now they are proving how much did he make from this type of “media”?
He runs a business. That business generates revenue. Next....
This woman is infuriating!!
Binger 2.0
Are you allowed to get up and leave like that when the court is in session?
Alex needed official coven permission to go pee pee. Arrest him!
he is going outside to scream something. its an uncontrollable habit.
When Alex walks in the court room the judge stands up.
Alex Jones put on a ton of weight🤣
He’s an adult, this isn’t children’s reading time.
Good I’m glad they have good products.
they're really going after this man it's ridiculous
he caused his supporters to harass and victimize the sandy hook parents over and over.
Yes sooo ridiculous spreading lies and misinformation to thousands of Americans with worms for brain who actually believe him hahahah
What those families went through because of him is ridiculous.
Actually if he had a studio, employees, editors, production crew and buildings and he actually paid himself a salary. This is VERY misleading. He likely had an accountant, attorneys, insurance and travel expenses etc.
Not to mention more than half of that money right off the bat is probably used to PAY for the product. He outsources it to a lab that makes all of the supplements.
@@dannyg2197 actually he asked if they made 165M in revenue. That;s pre-expense income.
wow lies are popular
@@take5th Not sure what the relevance is to what I said. I said more than half of the number provided likely went to just paying for the product
The title clearly states that the figure referenced is revenue, so how is it misleading?
Nice. Who doesn't want more super and more vitality?
Revenue isn't profit. They'd be lucky if 15 percent was pure profit
Take it all. He won't need it any more.
Question how come Jones can walk in and out of court ,when court is still on going?
It's not criminal court, it's civil.
He went to the bathroom
@@adonais81 he's not allowed 😂jk
*"generated over $165 million" does not mean PROFIT !!! Alex Jones has been known to discount items to near-zero profit, just to move them out the door. He also offers some items completely for free - when you buy it alongside another item.*
I dont care what his expenses were to create garbage, and neither should you.
YOU are full on delusional. Sugar pills are 0.005 cents cost and he sells for $1. IT IS A SCAM. He manufactures a disease or issue and come up with a "supplement" or treatment to "cure" it.
Lol that sounds like a solid business practice. It's almost like he's a charity, except he has bragged (not bragging) about his dodge hellcat he had a while ago. That's an expensive car. So OBVIOUSLY his free supplements are just filling up his warehouse and he has to get rid of them. Solid solid business and not a ploy for money
Maybe that was an out of context drop by me. Either way WE NEED TO FUND THE FIGHT! I declare infowar on YOU!
@@mr.ashenfire2624 You're lying right to everyone's face. You cared so much that you've inserted multiple opinions about it already. I hate liars.
This is like watching a b list movie with C actors
Something tells me these comments might be locked in future videos. It's not going the way the NPC channel curator intended.
They are using the information they gathered in discovery against the defendant; while at the same time they got a default judgment against the defendant for failure to cooperate in discovery. That's some pretty good lawyering.
Stick to guitar Kevin, because you're clearly not up to task to talk about the law process.
@@GregSiekman I'll leave it up to you serious folks who discuss how cute Praying Mantis are.
Hard to believe so many people can be so gullible to believe the most ridiculous claims.
Gullible is polite. These people are paranoid and growing in number. We need to tent the US for nutjobs.
@Jason H CNN doesn't have to do anything to make this fool look bad.
@@Gambler77713 lol CNN's highest rated episode was when they had AJ on
@@rumfordcA mix of believers and non-believers. Non believers to see what other ridiculousness he would spout off about.
@@Gambler77713 believer in what?
that's what happens when every MSM outlet gives you constant shout outs
To use children who died for power and money is the sickest, most evil, cruelest thing any human being could do, my first cousin lives in Newtown, Ct. and said she went to some of the funerals of the children.
As if running a successful private company is a crime in the USA?
It's not BUT I assume the reason this is coming up is because Infowars profited off their defamation of the Sandyhook families.... To what degree might be relevant to how much they are due in damages. That is just my guess of why this is coming up.
It's not dumbo. It's to provide evidence on the final judgement sum that'll be paid out. You guys are incredibly slow
A private company that spreads fake news and ruins peoples lives, is a criminal organisation. Infowars is arguably worse than the Mafia! Scum!
No, but fleecing the gullible with magical products should be a crime. Jones is an expert at it.
Crime? What crime? This isn’t a criminal trial.
They should impeach the judge and send HIM to Guantánamo Bay
Leave it to lawyers and a judge to not know how the real economy works.
I purchase supplements monthly from Alex Jones. Absolutely best products out there hands down. The tri-iodine does wonders for my thyroid issues. LOVE AJ
What does it do for your kidneys? Better check it!
you should have bought more brain force....
AJ is loser, so are you.
😂😂😂😂
@@mrt4362 lol
How much does Law and Crime make off of ad revenue from trials of murders?
They have permission to broadcast and are a crime journalist outlet.
@@mr.ashenfire2624 of course they have permission… I didn’t insinuate they didn’t.
They turn on and place their ads, they made millions off of the Depp trial. How about all the child murder trials? How many more millions?
dang. good point lol
@@mr.ashenfire2624 so you're agreeing they profit off of tragedy?
@@rumfordc they profit off of reporting on cases… whoever is in the case isn’t their choice. If Alex wants to scream conspiracy and cause harm to people… that is his doing.
Why wasn't the trial on camera?
Also. Why is there a jury here and not a jury during his trial? Is that normal?
And how much does it cost to run the production
The harder they try to destroy Alex the more I tend to believe him
Just goes to show how many crackpots there really are in this great country...
a sane person would see it that way yes but liberals don't like sanity lol
I am sure you do - you feel the truth -f...ck the facts and praise the hate I hope yyou peopel will bring us down soon !!!!!
@@jutswheezie Sure. Lets all forget how much he's been right
Exactly
Good job to him
The witness looks very uncomfortable.
It's odd that Ms. Karpova has so much difficulty answering questions from the plaintiff's attorney, while her testimony to Jones' attorney is so crisp, concise, and ....how shall we say....SCRIPTED.
same could be said for the judge's bias towards infowars, the witness has no obligation to help a lawyer
@@jimmyjohns2905 So...your position is that the witness' behavior is helping Alex Jones.
@@TrilobitesRTasty maybe not to the jury but in his own estimation 100%
Good job.
Celebration your own demise.
The things people do for the love of money always involves lying to people to a hypnotic degree. He is greaaat!!! At it.
🤣😂
he needs money to run his operation, that's not the same thing. the "people" who are "doing things for money involving lying to people to a hypnotic degree" are those who are suing him, ironically!
@@disaffected_malcontent Just say "I'm an UnEDucaTD and gullible fool, who parts with his money when a con man starts spewing conspiracy theories". It is sad that so many people roll over for the lies public figures tell.
@@disaffected_malcontent the legal process is open and public. He makes money at your expense,there is no value to his products or words. You are the product. Add hate and you pop out dollars. Like Pavlov’s dog.
@@take5th i do understand why you would say that honestly, he really does come across as the archetypal snake oil salesman to those who don't actually watch his show. the question is have you researched any of his products properly if at all?
Can we the people file a class action suit against InfoWars for diving the country and peddling false propaganda?
No! That would be hate speech cancel culture cry bully loser!
of course you can, but you won't because investigation will not work in your favor.
Those are rookie numbers. Listeners need to step up their supplement game.
All I know is when I was into Infowars and all that I bought some liquid , colidol or something like that and I almost literally died my heart was racing the whole nine yards I never brought anything again from there I tell you that.
You don't even know what you bought and consumed lol
@@blizzleberrydeluxe29 I thought I knew what I was taking I guess not. I learned my lesson though . Never have I ever did that again .
I don’t remember what it was called it was years ago I know it started with a C
@@cperez358 Crack. You were smoking crack, and I'm pretty sure you didn't get it from the infowars site.
Bought not brought. Possibly a side effect of the unknown liquid you consumed.
Jones should be forced to pay the $150M. Wish he would spend a few year in prison.
why does it feel like the judge and the lawyer are on the same side?
Why does he get to leave court whenever he wants
Bahaha I'm guessing Alex said something about "Income isn't revenue" cuz all the lazy brains are repeating it
Yeah, less we forget that he gets himself expensive watches to "dress as a satanist". So I have a spurious unresearched feeling that not every penny that he made went to spending & there was a lot of profit to keep...
Because it's true and the lawyer clearly knows this and is trying to show a big number that has no meaning without input costs. And it works on 90% of the population ... probably you as well.
And where's the lie? It's true l;ol
@Edwin If that were true, he would have to show a graph or something which demonstrates that he only sold lots of product when covering sandy hook, and not so much otherwise. No, the lawyer is just lying to the gullible jury and public who doesn't know the difference between profit and revenue. The ultimate goal is obviously to shut down platforms that aren't controlled by the people behind the pandemic.
Or we're educated and you just discovered the difference between revenue and profit.
They portray Infowars as some sort of anomaly in media that advertises to bring in revenue, which is btw much different than profit margin. I wonder what that was in the 3 years?
I can't imagine the amount of overhead when you're talking to everybody Roger Stone I bet you Eastman even
@@russhall1414 now in English?
@@northcon5 I expect when the January 6th Commission gets his phone records that was just put out there in his defamation case from Sandy Hook you'll know what I mean
Its important for the definition of deformation and establishing how much money they made when deciding punitive damages
It's a hit job on free speech. Making him the fall guy.
Where's the congressional law allow the state prosecution to operate in the court room. Same goes with the judge.
That lawyer looks like burger planet lol
First of all, the products infowars sell are good. Never have I once regretted a purchase from them and I've spent thousands over the years. If I ever do wish to return something, they have a no questions asked return policy. They are not out to rip anyone off. If all of American business operated in a similar manner we would all be better off because of it. Second, Alex is not constrained by advertisers which is a huge plus when freedom of speech is a primary reason for tuning in. Alex is constantly telling his audience to make up their own mind and is constantly citing his sources. When he provides his opinion, it is just that, his opinion. His audience is free to agree or disagree with it. How is that EVER a bad thing? Alex and the good people at infowars deserve every penny they make and then some.
100% TRUTH
@@user-ik1sd4qk6e 1000% LIES
Love him or hate him, Alex is the most successful conspiracy entrepreneur that’s ever played the game.
I'm pretty sure the celebrity evangelical types (Falwell, Robertson, Graham, the Bakkers etc.) have (or had) him beat by at least a few billion dollars. Jones is just one among many, although he's not explicitly religious.
@iron threads3 is msm is not?
Most of what he talks about isn't even a theory.
@@hellooutsiders6865 Most of it is the truth?
Exactly. That's why they had to deplatform him. It's common practice to silence those spreading "conspiracy theories," especially when the conspiracies are about to no longer be theories. Can't have people hearing that, so must destroy him.
Not taking sides, but this is an exposure of mainstream media, not just AJ.!!!
What exposure? And yes you are taking side.
@@daniellai7712 i think they're saying that news outlets everywhere profit off of these tragedies.
Please FIX AUDIO
I smell jealousy lurking. Someone's mad he made more than them. Uh ohhj
Alex walks out like a boss at 1:50 😎
Ask his ex-wife what a bully he is...
You mean waddled like humpty Dumpty?
Absolutely, unequivocally a despicable company. He has destroyed lives with lies. He has caused extra grief , pain and humiliation to families whom have already lost so much. I say a prayer for all involved . This is truly heartbreaking and reprehensible!
Do these people have nothing better to do?
If ever I’m in that position every time the sleazy lawyer says “so you would agree with me ……” I’d just wait because that’s a statement not a question. It’s just one of those things that grinds my gears! 🤣
She already had been identified by the Court as a hostile witness, so that type of questioning is allowed.
Lawyers imply slease inherently but still an extra sleaze added on as a descriptor can't hurt...
I cannot fathom why Jones attorneys are not objecting to this line of questioning
@@90scarguy Hence why you aren't a lawyer.
@@GregSiekman Hence. I have a Juris Doctorate out of Syracuse University. Do you? Just wondering.
RE: Megyn kelly making Alex sweat and look bad......what about what he looks like in this trial? Who is editing him to look like that this time????
Alexa: what is the difference between revenue and profit?
Impeach the judge And send her to Guantánamo
okay how much does cnn, fox, nbc make?
This trial is a joke.
Relevance ? I assume the reason this is coming up is because Infowars profited off their defamation of the Sandyhook families.... To what degree might be relevant to how much they are due in damages. That is just my guess of why this is coming up.
Waaaaay more than that
Alex Jones was right to question the narrative. We all should.
Ah yes, accusing parents of faking their children's deaths as an extreme response to calls for gun control over a shooting. He's a sad grifter and should be ridiculed whenever possible.
@@dashikashi4734 how is that illegal though? Whether you believe him or not this should be a scary situation for all Americans.
@@Bluffrat361 This isn't a legal charge, it's a lawsuit. You can sue for anything.
@@dashikashi4734 I’m suing
@@Bluffrat361 Whatever you say, snowflake. I'm glad the parents will be shaking him down for everything he's worth.