AirPulse A300 PRO vs Edifier R2750DB || Sound Comparison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 янв 2021
- Edifier R2750DB on amazon DE: amzn.to/3diZI1j
Edifier R2750DB on amazon UK: amzn.to/3c7C4V9
AirPulse A300PRO on amazon UK: amzn.to/3pU0Pes
------------------------------
Follow me on:
Instagram - / digitalstereophony
Facebook - / digitalstereophony
-----------------------------
Contact me at:
digitalstereophony@gmail.com
----------------------------
All the tracks used in this video can be found here:
• Test Tracks
----------------------------
-Sound recorded using pair of SE Electronics SE8 mics and Zoom H6 recorder
-Levels matched using SPL meter
-All tone controls set to neutral 
Наука
Instagram - instagram.com/digitalstereophony
Facebook - facebook.com/DigitalStereophony
That larger tweeter in the Airpulse really makes a difference. Much more clear and crisp highs.
NOTE: A300 PRO cost 1900 USD, while 2750 only 200USD. Nearly ten times less. 2750 are probably the best value from Edifier.
that price difference does make a difference does it not? plus these kinds of comparisons are pointless, if you have a set of bookshelf speakers play the songs on your speakers and they will sound a lot better than in these comparisons, now if you had the 2 speakers that are compared the difference will be night and day, the best option for you is to listen to these in person, for example the s3000 pro sound so much better than are shown in this channel, Zeos praised them, yet in the videos on this channel they sound distant, overly boomy etc, irl they sound really good and much more natural.
@@curedanxiety1679 because of what u mention, he includes reference track, to get idea of deviation. From this video, is safe to say that A300 has wider soundstage(ie you would expect good instrument separation even when not obvious from video), emphasis on upper mids and highs, especially violins sound good. On the other hand, R2750 has thick mids where distorted guitars are doing nice. That plus sound more in front should inform u about better presence and impact. Half of what im saying are guesses, but such key factors audible here gives expected results more often than not.
@@curedanxiety1679Zeos praises all his speakers, you can't trust that guy.
I still like him tho, hes fun.
everyone is cheering for a300 until they see the price..🥴
petit pouce bleu, pour l'encouragement continuer à faire ces tests hors du labo
Can you play more tracks with the human voice? It would help when determining their accurate reproduction of sound. Thank you!
I love your videos, it makes me decide better which one to buy. I think my headphones has it limits because I cant tell the difference between the 2 when I close my eyes and just listen but upon reading the comments mostly give better feedback with the airpulse. This really help a lot for me to decide which one to purchase. Great job.
Hi Digital Stereophony, what you are doing is great as always. Please make a battle for KEF LS50wireless, that name is so popular here in my country and alot of people looking forward to see how it sounds compare to others. For example, KEF LS50W vs Klipsch The fives/ sixes, Audioengine A5+ / HD6, Tannoy Gold 5 / 7, Dynaudio Xeo 20.. Appreciate it!
HAPPY NEW YEAR!. This is my first comment in 2021. Thanks a lot for this interesting and striking comparison. Personally, this is one of the best comparisons you've ever done. The difference in price between both speakers is wide, huge. Those Airpulse are basically 7 times more expensive than de Edis (in Spain at least.) Those A300 are not the standard ones, those are the PRO. I know that Airpulse is the High-class brand of Edifier. Actually, the official Distributor in Spain for Edifier names Airpulse products as "Edifier Airpulse". It is like Lexus to Toyota. However, in this case, if I were the owner of those Airpulse, I'd be rather pissed off. On the other side, if I owned those Edifier I'd be over the moon. Seeing and listening to the video, it was like you were just switching images and the sound was coming from the "same" speakers all the time and you could only notice the difference when playing the source. As I said, very interesting and useful comparison. Sometimes we are audio fools that tend to think that if it is "cheap" it is bad. Audio fooled the one who thought that having those Airpulse would be 7 times better than other speakers. Of course, regarding the aesthetics, power and materials, those A300 are more appealing, powerful and way better finished. Should we expect a Edifier S3000 PRO vs Airpulse A300 PRO? I still need to watch the comparison of HS8 vs A300 PRO. From that video, I might get an idea. Keep it up!
R2750DB is a superb value for money for sure, but there is no need to be pissed off if someone owns A300Pro. It is a superior product in every aspect. The price of it is high, but I would say it is justified. It is hard to convey all the advantages of A300Pro in a comparison like this though
@@DSAUDIOreview As I said in my comment (aside from the aesthetics) for sure the materials, the finish, the components are way better and its sound can fill a bigger room. However, just by listening to the tracks in the comparison just makes me wonder if it is really reasonably priced. Thanks for your reply. I can't recommend enough your channel. Kind regards, Jovan. P.D.: I'd love to see a S3000 PRO vs A300 PRO ;)
@@j.r.j.8499 I had r2750Db and let me tell you that A300pro absolute crushes it, destroys it, annihilate it. This demo remind me excatly how it sounded. Aka flat as pancake, boomy, no resolution, no speed, no dynamics.
It sound good for amateurs, but when you listened real good speakers you will see that a300pro is way superior.
Look how much LS50 wireless 2 cost and How much better a300pro is considering it cost a 800 euro less.
LOL, its shame for 300 pro.
It doesn't cost 7,5x more.
If you mostly listen to vocal, A300 Pro is phenomenal. Male and female vocal sounds clear, fuller and have better articulation. The track samples from this test not include many vocal.
Пожалуй, посижу на своих 2750))) Хотел менять на эти, но негде в люб послушать. А тут понял, что нет особого смысла менять.
Там различия как ролс ройс и жигуль
на самом деле вживую отличие действительно огромное, просто пропасть, но и ценовая категория тут с огромным разрывом
@StoPoSto добавь звуковую карту ещё, да и понятие хороших наушников у каждого своё, вон эпл дрочеры до сих пор думают что аирподс хорошие уши для музыки...Тут звук в А300 более резкий, чёткий и не смазанный, имеет прямо отчётливые границы баса ( по крайней мере в моих 10 летних рейзерах это отчётливо слышно, хотя наушники парашные, но аудиокарта хоть немного исправляет это )
@youtube it's morons 2750, нч 6.5.. гудящее пердящий) средины там нет это одно цельное говно .
@youtube it's morons у фирмы жбл получается качать даже 13 см динамиками.
Is there an Airpulse A300 pro vs Edifier S3000Pro comparison? I can barely hear any difference between the A 300 pro and 2750DB
Dear Digital Stereophony you tested the Airpulse A300. Did you notice any apparent difference in the sound of Airpulse A300 and Airpulse A300pro? I am asking as I would like to purchase the Airpulse A300 and to change my Microlab solo 7c the sound of which is too boomy with everything except for electronic club music. Unfortunately, I had a chance to listen to Airpulse A300 in store with all other market’s and crowds’ sounds around so it was quite difficult to figure out the whole picture. But it seemed to me in rock music there wasn’t enough ‘fat’ with Airpulse A300 or with the ‘Prodigy - timebomb zone’ the wasn’t enough drive. How do you think is it worth getting Airpulse A300 to change Microlab solo 7c ? Mostly my music preference is blues, country, vocal pop, jazz, and others.
check the s3000pro here ruclips.net/video/zl-TniZ97Ps/видео.html and here ruclips.net/video/XNmIU3-SJIk/видео.html
airpulse resolution is superior overall higher fidelity however edifier ain't bad considering they are cheap
Hey man, out of curiosity, what happened to the studio or the space where you used to the testing and recording? I noticed in the video that this is already a different place
I moved to a different city
@@DSAUDIOreview I see, I hope everything's turning out well. Looking forward to more videos.
Может есть у кого опыт прослушивания вживую А300 vs A300pro? Большая ли разница?
IT's interesting that on Man on Fire the speakers give more bass than the original track, and the A300 also gives more treble.
я закрываю глаза и непонимаю когда звук от одних колонок сменяется другими) просто одно и тоже)
если слушать с акустики за 2 тысячи рублей, то да, весь звук будет один ))
To my ears via Topping L30 + JVC FW01:
Airpulse A300 delivered a slight margin of fresh crispness on a platter of spatial soundscapes.
R2750DB didn't frail far behind with superb bass response, on par mids and highs.
On a back to back comparison doesn't do R2750DB justice it's a stellar performer.
It's just when facing the A300, well save up and get the A300.
Anyone knows how to get 2750's in north america?
it would be nice if you could test with sanson studio GT!!
Im looking at these 300PRO and thinking... Would i miss deep bass of S3000pro? Is it very noticable loss on movies?
Hi guys, I need help. I have visited several sound stores and asked about the Edififer R2850.
I have been told that Edifier in general does not provide good sound and this has come to my attention because of the very good comments I have heard on this channel. In my country, Argentina, there is not a single store that has Edifier equipment, except for the official store which, unfortunately, does not have a showroom and they only sell their products online. In other words, I would have to buy it without having heard it. Could you help me decide? Do you think I should "risk" buying it?
I have been told that Edifier is not hifi and provides sound far below any hifi stereo system. Is that true? Does this Edififer model worth it?
Are there maybe some better options for the same price?
Thank you and please excuse me for my bad English.
Edifier is like the Toyota of speakers. They are good for the price you pay but are arguably award winning. I have an Edifier MR4 and it's really good for what I paid for it. which is a 100 dollars.
Incredible value of Edifier R2750DB! I don't need it.. otherwise I would buy them! I am tempted!
Ambas atendem muito bem👍🏻
Air pulse é mais aberta, mas, a outra custa muito menos 👍🏻
Congratulations and thanks for the comparison. I know they are slightly different categories, but I have a big doubt if I get the EDIFIER R2750DB or EDIFIER R1280DBS. Besides the difference in RMS power, is the sound quality very different? Sorry for my bad english. Thanks.
Absolutely get R2750DB. They are much better
I was waiting for the R2000DB, but thanks to you I have decided to get the R2750DB. Maybe it's my idea, but these sounds more..."opened".
Do you think that the extra cost worth? It's too late for me, but someone else could have the same dilemma by now. If so, what do you think is the better in the R2750?
You made a goopd decision. I prefere R2750DB over R2000DB, as it is more neutral and extended in both ends. The only aspect I like more about R2000DB is the looks and build quality
On my r2000db i can't hear any difference. maybe the difference is too little to tell. if that is the case. then, 2750 is a better buy then the a300pro
A300👌🏻
For the price you pay for the R2750DB, it is good value.
They have Aptx bluetooth?
@@luckyjcp They don't mention anything about APTX on Edifier website
Total amateur here but i think a 3-way will always do better than a 2 way if done right. Seems pretty obvious we're losing some mids with the 2-way vs. the 3-way.
its unfortunate you cant get the edifier 2750DB in north america; i'd love a pair.
Edifier has a weird market segmentation, with some products unavailable in certain regions. This being said, they just launched R2850DB, same as R2750DB but with an 8" woofer instead of the 6.5" one; delivery is estimated for March, so right now it would be a great time to make an inquiry to your local dealer.
I'm a very happy user of 2750, and I was on the fence about buying a second pair or something better; when I heard about the 2850, it was settled for me.
I like the air pulse better, the tweeter is cleaner
I cant justify the 7x price difference from this vid.
wow amazing plz hs5 one wih krk g5
Можно пожалуйста протестировать Edifire R2600 и Sven MC-30 ??? Пожалуйста
R2600 - давно снятая с производства и довольно косячная модель.
А по поводу Sven MC-30 (и любой другой их модели) - никто в мировом аудио-комьюнити не считает (справедливо) колонки Sven за акустику (разве что только в России и у ближайших "соседей" в лице Беларуси и Украины). Так что в зарубежных сравнениях или обзорах продукцию Sven тебе не увидеть.
With closed eyes I can't determine which speakers are playing.
Me too.
Do R2750DB have a DSP crossover or passive crossover?
DSP, as it has full digital amps (separate amp for every speaker drivers)
Oh, shiii..Best comparsion good speakers in 2 different price categories ever)))
P.S. The speaker systems with which I no longer hear the difference
Класс, очень похожее звучание.
I honestly can't tell the difference. I close my eyes and can't tell the switch between speakers, only with the source track. I guess whichever is the cheaper one is my choice huh.
For the money (and sound) Edifier all the way!!
Airpulse = Edifier. It's like Lexus to Toyota
A300 pro did a good job on vocal
Although the edifiers are able to reproduce much of what the Airpulse can, the highs from them sound noticeably cheap and mid/bass sound a bit hollow. Everything from the Airpulse sounds nice and tight, like the drivers are mounted in a dampening cement wall 2 ft thick.
True the airpluss sound very very Clear and not muffled
Что подгуживает, комната или фазики?
В последнее время у него в записях слишком много влияния комнаты стало. Понять уже что-либо намного сложнее.
For me, A300 are more dynamic and have more treble, and edifier are less dynamic (lol) and have less treble (lol again xD) but have more medium and bass(in my opinion)
So for me edifier are better because they cost really less than airpulse for same quality.....
Вы слышите разницу? Зачем платить больше, если разницы - никакой? (с).
Не услышал вообще, у меня мониторы Kali LP6 и звуковая Esi Juli Xte. Я думал разница будет по верхам, но нет, мизерная разница.
@@vladimirfilichev8414 Ну, у меня не так всё круто. И мониторы M-audio AV-40, и звуковуха Creative SB Audigi, первая - правда, с адаптированными дровами от более крутой. Но разницы я тоже не услышал, в том числе и на высоких.
Я услышал разницу,но не могу сказать,что из 2-х этих систем кто-то хуже.
So comparing a 300.00 set to a 2299.00 set doesn't seem fair. I am an edifier fan. I have 3000 pros 1850s a300s and a300 pros. I use a t5 sub as well with the 1850s.
Wow! I thought to change my r2750 to airpulse a100, but now seeing the comparison I understand that it probably doesn't make sense
Perhaps this makes sense if you need to keep your space on the table, and get rid of background noise. Do you have any noticeable background noise in R2750DB? Because in my R2700 I got it.
Andrew if you add a good subwoofer to A100 than it makes more sense
@@user-gb7wi7ig8t in R2750DB switching power supply, they are absolutely noiseless. And for the placement I ordered custom stands
@@DSAUDIOreview Thank. I have a subwoofer edifier t5. He's not that a very cool, but at least something)
Pero el A300 PRO cuesta más del doble que los Edifiers R2750DB. Me quedo con los Edifiers.
В пульсах звук чище сразу слышно.
И стоит дороже минимум в 5 раз
Airpulse have better imaging, more controlled bass and overall cleaner sound. The R2750DB are pretty decent, though. Especially for the price.
Orchestral music would be a great test -- e.g., mass violins. That is something lacking in the coverage of tracks
What is going on at 07:04 than?
@@DSAUDIOreview Well that's hardly large-scale orchestral. A very limited, restricted, idiosyncratic example. The types of tracks/music you have chosen are hardly a comprehensive coverage. I'm sure they fit well with the main type of viewer of your channel. I'm just suggesting something different.
@@David_Span that must do
@@DSAUDIOreview So I take that as a 'no' to improving coverage of musical genres? The challenge of reproducing a symphony orchestra: getting a smooth, refined sound of the upper range of 10+ violins playing in unison; enormous dynamic range; rendering of detail at highly contrasting levels of volume... An opportunity missed...
В 2730 твитеры такие же впендюрить И будет норм)
Unfair.. compare it with s3000 pro
for the fraction of the price the 2700 are more than fine. 300 vs 1200 $$
2750DB pros: Front ported is a massive advantage if needing to be close to the wall. Bass performs well. Mids perform well due to midrange driver. Cons: the tweeter sucks.
AirPulse A300 PRO vs AirPulse A300
А здесь тебе что понравились больше?
@@alexpris3705 ничего
Microlab Solo 7 vs Edifier R2750DB
edifier
Зачем платить больше?
Сравните вживую - поймёте зачем.
@@user-gn7yo4qn6x согласен, что через Ютуб и наушники объективных выводов не сделаешь.
Maybe I don't have such delicate ears of an audiophile! When I close my eyes, I can't hear the transition between the speakers at all!
That has probably more to do with the audio gear you use than with your ears
They sound almost the same... But the A300 Pro is SOOOO MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE!
The mids on the R2750DB are more present though.
Everything is going to sound almost the same when it's recorded on a microphone, processed through video editing software, uploaded and compressed by RUclips and then comes out through whatever your system is. Honestly if I could be bothered I would do these sorts of videos with $30 speakers vs $2000 speakers just to show how pointless it is.
@@daysandwords
False. This channel has a lot of comparisons and most of them have very perceptible differences between speakers.
The thing on this one video can be that either the two speakers sound the same or the difference is so small that the microphone, the video editing software and RUclips compression make it impossible for us to notice.
@@williamtael8379 No, demonstrably true. You can write false 15 million times for all I care, ask anyone who actually knows anything how well a comparison can be made through YT and they will tell you, it's almost impossible.
I actually felt that this comparison was more noticable between the speakers than most of this channel\s comparisons, which stands to reason with how much more the speakers are and the fact that they have a different kind of tweeter.
@@daysandwords
Just watch the other videos on this channel.
Speakers won't sound as good in a video as they really do in real life, that's obvious, but they do sound different from others on the same video most of the time.
the R2750DB have APTX bluetooth?
Sadly, no.
AirPulse почище звучат, но цена у них явно завышена
Тормозной гудящий отстающий бас на обоих ас
i didnt like the mids of r2750db lots of sacrifice trying to sound wide ... r200db has better mids.
not. r2000db is simply less than the middle, this is just more pleasant to the ears and it seems that this is better, but this does not exclude the fact that the middle should be like this
@@Andrew_Nekrasov mid from 2750 sounds artificial to my ears. S2000mkiii creates more natural mid frequency despite its 2 way design.
Well, I guess thats what you gain for 6 times the price. I think it's well worth it.
в аирпульсе динамики хорошие, а вот усилитель полный шлак
А300 очень сильно ярчят. не понимаю за что такие бабки. динамики и фактуры в сложных треках вообще нет. а слушать только один джаз и классику на калошах за 2 к уныло и неинтересно
Same shit lol
The edifier is to bright for my taste, artificially so...I would get tired of hearing that after 10 minutes
Edifier sounds better. Much more depth.
Airpulse = edifier 👀
not much difference between them. 😅 sq wise. such a disappointment. considering id like to buy them in place of my m300 mkii
the difference is not much visible here but in reality there is a far difference in both of these speakers.. Airpulse A300 pro is way way better its hard to understand in this video.
Heard both at the edifier showroom. Nothing so different. Very subtle with the a300 pro having an airier and smoother treble. Has deeper bass too. On most of the tracks tested, vocals, male and female sounded better on the s2750db. There is something about 3 ways that make the vocals pop naturally. 7 times the price? No way in hell the a300 pro can justify that price.
@@-MarkWinston- did you check the source components .. cable connections they ware using. .. my test was with rock/metal and guitar heavy music .. in my experience the capability and refinement difference is very clear. I wasn't comparing the price but price to performance starts to reduce at higher level.
@@anikkhan777 both on optical. The a300 pro definitely has a superior treble but thats about it. Mids definitely went to the r2750db, even the salesperson said that. I cant even say its twice as good.
@@-MarkWinston-youre clown mate. I had both at different times and S3000PRO smokes s2750db let alone Airpulse 300pro.
You just have no hearing ability.
@@20puskinas1992 you must have wet ears because the mids on the s2750db is way more linear than the A300. And the frequency response measurements I took prove just that. Your ears are certainly untrained to not catch the recessed mids on the A300.
AirPulse A300 PRO - 9.5 vs Edifier R2750DB - 9.7
The price says otherwise though...