Multiculturalism is the Problem NOT the Solution | Konstantin Kisin
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 23 мар 2024
- John and Konstantin Kisin discuss the impacts of multiculturalism on Western Society.
Raised in the Soviet Union, Konstantin is not persuaded by leftist visions of utopia, and exhorts reasonable people to speak out against the 'woke mob'. He also argues that multiculturalism should be rebranded as multi-ethnic societies with a 'monoculture', uniting everyone from different backgrounds.
Konstantin Kisin is a writer, social commentator, comedian, and co-host of the free speech podcast Triggernometry. He is a regular on British and American TV and radio shows including Question Time, Good Morning Britain, BBC Breakfast, Daily Politics, LBC Cross Question, Tucker Carlson, the Megyn Kelly Show, and many others.
Konstantin has written for publications including the Daily Telegraph, the Spectator, Tablet Magazine, Quillette, and Standpoint as well as his first book, An Immigrant’s Love Letter to the West. More recently, he spoke at the inaugural Alliance for Responsible Citizenship Conference in London, England.
Conversations feature John Anderson, former Deputy Prime Minister of Australia, interviewing the world's foremost thought leaders about today's pressing social, cultural and political issues.
John believes proper, robust dialogue is necessary if we are to maintain our social strength and cohesion. As he puts it; "You cannot get good public policy out of a bad public debate."
If you value this discussion and want to see more like it, make sure you subscribe to the channel here: / @johnandersonconversat...
And stay right up to date with all the conversations by subscribing to the newsletter here: johnanderson.net.au/contact/
Follow John on Twitter: / johnandersonac
Follow John on Facebook: / johnandersonac
Follow John on Instagram: / johnandersonac
Support the channel: johnanderson.net.au/support/
Website: johnanderson.net.au/
Podcast: johnanderson.net.au/podcasts/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ konstantinkisin
konstantinkisin.com/
Triggernometry: / @triggerpod
As Paul Joseph Watson said, "All cultures are not the same. Some cultures are better than others."
Who decides though
@@seanmoran2743the culture not looking to enter.
I take your point, but the culture looking to enter, wouldn't want to desert their own culture for another unless they thought it was better too. So, we all know, but some of us aren't being honest about it.@@vernonbowling5136
@@vernonbowling5136 What those from the North of England dishing on those from the South? Man, Liverpool and Manchester are like different countries and they are within spitting distance of one another.
@@seanmoran2743 Someone who has stakes in the country who represents the actual country first and foremost?
A house divided against itself cannot stand ! Been true for thousands of years and it is still true.
Divide and conquer, united we stand divided we fall… always has been true, always will be. You are absolutely right.
But the demand to prioritize a national identity above the human identity _is_ division! People are so attached to the idea and pride of nation that they can't see it's the very thing causing division.
"United we stand, divided we fall" is right. But prioritizing a national identity is division, and immigration is the means by which national identity is dissolved for unity.
Nailed it. Multi national. Not multicultural. .....Monocultural.
that's what France tried, it did'nt work. Konstantin's diagnostic is correct, but it has been tried and look at both UK and France... almost the same situation although France has'nt lost as much ground as the UK, it's still a constant fight and it comes at aver high price. You can't force people to integrate to your culture, exept if you have very little immigration : they have not choice but to.If you insist on having millions they will gather and form an outgroup. It's time to face that having millions of people coming in is not a good thing, it's not sustainable, it does'nt work. Low levels were ok ,if you picked just who you needed where you needed them, mass immigration is'nt.
@@backintimealwyn5736 Volumes determines the result, nothing else. Assimilation.
@@backintimealwyn5736I think I agree with you, I'm a foreigner living in China with my Chinese wife, and I try to just be inconspicuous, avoid speaking English outside, etc. But if you have a lot of foreigners like in cities such as Shenzhen they tend to congregate, hang out at bars, and just speak their own language and not integrate. But the amount of foreigners is still low. Japan also has low levels, though higher than China, and has kept its culture.
@@backintimealwyn5736 I agree with you on the volume of immigration. It must be lowered to a level that will enhance, but not overwhelm the host culture. We have uncontrolled immigration, driven by an economic model that simply does not work and is in fact supported by lies.
@@leewilton5082 why are you so persuaded that it will "enhance" in any way the host culture? Has it? Ever? Do you find that your culture , whatever it is, british, Italian, swedish has been "enhanced" in the last decades? All I see is decay everywhere in Europe. It's not only mass migration's fault though, but I think the enhacemnet theory can be declared debunked from now. So sure, in America , when they were draining the brains from Europe it would bring enhancement, steell all the PHDs in rocket science from a place like early 20th century europe , you'll get pimped as a nation. But it's not what's happening in Europe right now.
How do you explain that some cultures and ethnicities seem to be so much better though at going abroad and assimilating into whatever culture they chose? So for example, I have never met a single person that has complained about German, French, Portuguese, Japanese, Vietnamese immigrants anywhere in this world.
This really only ever seems to be a problem with people from a few different groups:
- Muslims - in particular if they are from Northern Africa or the Middle East
- Sub Saharan Africa
- People from the Subcontinent, i.e. from Bangladesh, Pakistan, India etc.
Why do we struggle so much with some groups, but not with others?
I grew up in East Germany, half of the kids I went to school with were from former socialist countries whose parents had settled in East Germany - i.e. Russia, Poland, Czechia, Romania, Vietnam etc. Absolutely no problems and everyone got along just fine. All of these kids also grew up to be Germans. Sure, they kept part of their identity from their parent's origin, traditions, certain values, faith, food etc... but they also understood to adapt to German culture and it worked out brilliantly.
Yet we have always had massive problems with Turkish communities, people from Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Morocco, Tunisia, Syria, Egypt etc. and it's just not the same. They do not integrate. They do not become German. They just stay whoever they are and practice the exact same beliefs as they did in their home country. And the worst thing is that when you challenge them on anything, they try and oppress you in your own country... some even go so far as to try and force their beliefs and culture on the native population.
Why is that? Are we just too incompatible culturally and from a religious point of view?
Why are we not having problems with some, but massive problems with other groups?
There is clearly something about certain cultures and the way religion manifests in those cultures that make them so they cannot integrate with our cultures, values, society etc... and denying this doesn't help anybody.
Have you ever heard of any problems with the 220,000 Ukrainians the UK took in after the start of the war with Russia? Or with the 150,000 people from Hong Kong? No.
But we hear every day about Muslim communities that are building a state within a state, refuse to interact with anybody outside of their own ethinic circle, even go so far as to try and tell us we should adapt to their world views.
It annoys me beyond belief that we seem completely incapable of simply acknowledging that not every person is good and not every person should be allowed to live among us.
Sad reality is, there are good people and there are bad people.
A successful multi-ethnic society can only work if we are extremely picky with who we let become part of our society.
Well that was very insightful and I think accurate. So I'll answer your question of why we can't seem to exist peacefully alongside certain cultures in a very simple explanation. Some cultures just simply produce better human beings than others, and nobody wants to be a worse human being than they are so they reject the substandard culture.
Quite right. Us native Anglo saxons have no problem with Chinese or other far eastern immigrants. Their cultures seem to be much more compatible to ours. It seems that mainly Islamic cultures are not compatible with western cultures
Spot on there are compatible cultures and people and the non compatible
Because ıslam religion is dangerous
it seems to stem from the fundamental misunderstanding of the difference between making the factual statement that some differences are not compatible and intolerance/hatred/prejudice against differences, i.e. pointing out that some cultures (or some practices within different cultures) are poorly compatible and will result in tensions, is often equated to racism
I find I have more culturally in common with Nigerians and Chinese friends from church, than with other English people at work.
Culture is about values and behaviour, not ethnicity.
Very well articulated!
Kisin had wise parents.
It is important from whatever country people immigrate from that they are not aggressive or antagonistic towards a country’s heritage, which in Australia 🇦🇺 was a strong Christian heritage.
We have British migrants either side of us and they hate Christianity and have blatantly been persecuting and abusive towards us and regularly, deliberately stalk us.
I have had some Muslim immigrants mainly the women who have openly looked with contempt at me whilst being out at the shops, just because I am not a Muslim.
So integration and respect from wherever you come from, is absolutely paramount.
The Muslims I have met in Australia have been wonderful people, especially the women. Did you spit on them?
the age old tactic ..."divide and conquer..."
That statement is inaccurate and misleading as a generalization. Division is necessary at certain times and levels of organization, such as cell division, leaving the nest, separate cultures (nations) at the global level, ...etc.
You're exactly right! It's hilarious how quickly a "change agent" ThinkofWhy responded, trying to refute you.
See: Coudenhove-Kalergi
@@user-yy2fl2yf5m I did not state that that statement was false or wrong. The words I used were "inaccurate" and "misleading".
So who's to blame for the success of the divide and culture strategies: the people allowing the immigrants in or the people who refuse to accept the new culture? The rulers allowing the immigration have no power if the people they're trying to divide choose not to be divided. When you truly understand divide and conquer strategies, you stop falling for them!
Red and yellow make orange. Lots of red and a little yellow don't make red, they make a redish-orange. A lack of acceptance of the immigrants by the host nation's citizens is equivalent to falling for the divide and conquer strategies. Acceptance of the immigrants means a new redish-orange culture, *not* a yellow culture.
Compromise has to come from all sides. The national identities are the problem. The nature of globalization has forced us to give up our national identity and to prioritize our human identity for the first time in recorded history, and if you push back, you're asking for war... First trade wars and then physical wars. European nations fight for years, and they eventually formed the EU. The same pattern is playing out between every nation in Earth and there's nothing you can do to stop it. Don't be mad, be happy! It's a wonderful time to be alive. We get to experience part of the transition of this planet from divided chaos to united peace.
Kisin is right on the money !
Excellent two men - the BBC will ignore them both.
They are BOTH agents/tools of the Global Jewish Nation.
Excellent conversation.
"Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society." Aristotle.
Too many people equate ethnicity with culture. They say multicultural when they really mean multiethnic. All people are equal regardless of ethnicity, but all cultures are not equal.
yup
There has to be integration otherwise there is fragmentation.
RCC is ready to accept you conversions ;-)
You cannot intigrate contradictory values ,For a nation at peace, as we had in general inthe distant past befor madcap immigration, you nead the possibillity of assimilation ,When the incommers are set against that, even integration then we have big problems , Problems we did not nead to have ..
I'd argue that mass immigration has a dampening affect on economic growth,
firstly since many migrants need support and secondly since it has a steady demoralising affect on the public
It’s a way of driving down wages while increasing pressure on services which increases more immigration
Well said
nailed it!
I need objective truth. Not left or right obsessions.
Don't we all, however were not getting it from the mainstream media, just look at some objective truth's from Sweden to see how it could end up for us
There is objective truth on the Left and on the Right .
@@kevanbodsworth9868 sure, but isn’t there a wholistic perspective? I guess that’s psychology, health, or spirituality. We need genius level leaders, not obsessives with blind spots, who hurt peace & progress.
@@xeropunt5749 I do not believe genius is required .. Integrety and a determined drive to truth .. Intelegent but not genius ,We have burocrats who opperate the levers of power.Thier highest priority is to stay in power-
Thank you for saying the truth.
What he doesn't address is the all-important question of what to do with people who are incompatible with the nation's values, etc., who are born citizens of the country, of several generations; the people you can't tell to "go back to where you came from", because they are already where they came from.
You then require an overall policy which covers everyone to swear alliance to the UK above any and all other parts of the world and them be legally obliged to do so, like all members of the Armed Forces.
But that's treading a dangerous path too.
Its a problem that doesn't really have any good solution.
Outstanding and remarkable work exposing the truth John and Konstantin! 💯 God bless you! 💯✝️🕊🙏❤️🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱
Multi-ethnic is good as long as they are monoculture.
We are Canadian, therefore everyone who lives here should adopt the Canadian culture.
That involves religious tolerance. So practice your religion, but respect everyones right to practice their own...
Muslims, im talking about how you treat jews. Clear?
Yes.
YES.
Pure pleasure
Spot on
Mixtures of people bring with it social and political ideals that are often forced on each other. When in Rome.....is what makes a country cohesive. In fact, requiring language proficiency and classes on history should be the first step toward integration to obtain cohesiveness.
Well said KK. Thank you John.
I don’t think I have ever heard this explained better! I am an immigrant to Canada(55 years ago) and I still remember my father saying much the same thing as Konstantin’s parents when my Mom suggested we join the Dutch club, his response.. “ We did not come to Canada to hang out with a bunch of Dutch people, we came here to be Canadian.. How far we have come from that point of view, even suggesting that all cultures are not created equal means you are considered racist..
I was saying this in the eighties that multiculturalism will not work if the visitors don't like the guests.....
I think you mean,. If the visitors don't like the hosts, but you are totally correct. Most people could see exactly what was coming with 3rd world emigration.
@@chrisdickinson7949Exactly. It only serves to bring the west into the 3rd world as most immigrants bring the cultural issues that infest their homeland with them, mostly without realising it.
@@chrisdickinson7949 you are correct sir..... and now I'd look like a cuck if I was to edit it and leave your comment breathless.... so I'll just say. "thanks it must have been a typo" 😁😁🤦
@@chrisdickinson7949 right you are sir.... oops.... I can't correct it now or your comment would become breathless... I'll tell everyone it's a typo. 😁😁🤦
Or the guests don't like the hosts
In canada yes
Finally someone says it out loud
Just look around, and you see it yourself.it does not work.
"The Stranger at my Gate"
Ever heard of Adam Smith?
He wrote this little book called Wealth of Nations. In it he used the word 'education' Eighty Times and wrote "read, write and account" multiple times.
So shouldn't mandatory accounting in the schools be part of Western Culture?
this might be the best articulation of the issue i have heard yet, multi ethnic > multi culture. well done KK :D
There's only one culture in Australia, it's called Australian.
Sorry to tell you that is not the case brah.
I have a dream @@Marriedrebels
@@michaelwhittaker7960 I do too brother. And it’s to keep Australia at least 90% Australian. And to drink Victoria bitters everywhere I live!
@@MarriedrebelsI'd say 95%/5% is the maximum that can adequately function....
Multiculturalism is yet another failed left wing idea.
In short, yes.
It's lovely Kisin saying this and the other is ideal but breaking down that barrier in cultures from very "monocultural" parts of the world is easier said than done.
What he speaks of is hundreds of years away not 1, 5, or 50.
Good luck with that....
Truth‼️
too late my friend …
Kisin is absolutely right. Social cohesion doesn't exist without a national identity.
Keep every nation below 10% and we are all fine.
5%
so true. multi ethic, yes ! Multicultural, not so much !
Your parents got it absolutely correct. Well done.
Yes yes yes
John, very simple. keep Islamists in their realm and Christians in other realms, and Buddhists in their realm etc......etc...............
if you applied the same logic of multiculturalism vs monoculturalism to a smaller, simpler unit like a house share, I'm sure almost everyone would agree with Konstantin here. If each individual comes into the house share, just keeps to themselves, behaves exactly as they id before and makes no effort to integrate into the shared culture of the house, it would be a mess. Yet if they accepted that a well functioning living situation requires that everyone conform to some degree of shared rules, values and behaviours, within which they could absolutely maintain their own individuality and have their differences be respected, the house would run smoothly.
And a whole country is a wee bit more complex than a household
In order to make this argument, I think you have to clearly define what parts of the "Western" culture "we got right" as they say. Just making a blanket statement covers a lot of territory, including a lot of pretty serious crimes. Was it Western culture that was responsible for the deaths of roughly ten million people in the Belgian colony of the Congo? Certainly the people there saw it that way, and perhaps might have made the same arguments against multiculturalism. Was it western culture that decimated the people's of the America's? It seems likely to me, and I suspect to the original inhabitants of the Caribbean, say. The difference is, of course, that Western culture, as in the Congo, was imposed by force of arms. In any case, many of the "good" parts of western culture weren't handed out by benevolent leaders concerned only with the happiness of the world. They were fought for by people who did concern themselves. And just in case we've forgotten, Western Culture brought us two world wars in the space of forty years that killed roughly 70 million people, many more mained and injured, borders redrawn, and many millions driven from their homes. So when someone talks about "Western Culture". I would like them to be quite specific about what they mean.
OK, but so what? Belgium gave Congo back to the Africans, Americans are not going to give America back the the aboriginals, nor are the Australians going to. Who's better off now, today? The aboriginals? or the residents of the present-day Democratic Republic of the Congo? The important thing, as Kisin says, is what we in the WEIRD cultures are doing right today, and how we got here was what our history is. There is no point apologizing for it or, even worse, atoning for it. We're not going to pay you reparations, if that's what you are driving at. If you are one of those "oppressed" cultures, you are better off materially than you would have been if my ancestors had stayed home and left you alone to invent your own wheels and writing and steam engines and antibiotics and vaccines.
I agree with Konstantin....In THEORY. But the one point that multi-ethnic societies can be stronger APPEARS to have been proven wrong. There seems to be a "tipping point" where diversity can only work in small, slow doses. But as soon as one group grows to a certain point, they attempt to change the society to *THEIR* culture.
For example, look at black Americans. Most have been in America for GENERATIONS. And yet, they have their own culture. Not some culture that they brought with them from Africa. A separate culture they created SPECIFICALLY to separate themselves from other races. Not only do they *NOT* want to integrate with other races, but they're also offended when other races try to integrate with them (e.g., "cultural appropriation").
I think you better research Jim crow laws
No way this person is an American…you have NO CLUE what you’re talking about. It’s best to conduct research and think before speaking
Black American culture (and Native Aboriginal culture) adds in the politics of perpetual grievance, which is highly toxic. And Muslims bring religious fanaticism enforced by complaints of "Islamophobia". Japanese, Portuguese, Korean, Croatian, Polish, Filipino, Vietnamese, Indian on the other hand are multi-ethnic without a lot of trouble-makers even though a city like Toronto is majority non-white. They generally want to become "Canadian". Unlike the grievance cultures. They want to take over and make it their way. That's part of what grievance just *is*.
GDP or GDP / head of population. GDP can go up while per capita it can fall.
As is happening in Canada. And much of our recent GDP increase has been due to expansion of the civil service to hire all these newcomers.
I’m now in my 70s, and since I was 15yo I have been saying multiculturalism is dangerous, but multiracialism is of benefit to a country. If I could see that 15 why can people understand it now?
Konstantin nailed it with that very "proper" distinction - multi-ethnic as opposed to multi-cultural. Multi ethnic in origin but in an over-riding monocultural society, in accordance with the that society's culture. But, of course, in a country lead by weak politicians so water-logged in wokedom as here in the UK, any culture which wants to muscle in and, effectively, invade and conquer is perfectly at liberty to do so, without the need for arms. Democracy comes down to votes and if you have the numbers, you can take over that country.
Barbara Spectre said that unless the nation except multicultural they will have sanctions
You only have to look at most foreigners in how they settle into new countries to see how multiculturalism does not work. They stay together in their own gated communities and don't assimilate with local customs.
If you come here you abandon your own customs and live among the locals not away from them, and not try to change your new country to become like the one you left.
Well, migration in Australia 50's,60's worked reasonably Italian, Greek, and English immigrants came to Australia with skills needed & enriched Australia. Bringing immigrants with little or no skills relying on Centrelink payments government housing long term is just ridiculous. We already have Australian born population waiting many years in these conditions, some of which are also choosy on their employment choices. The taxes are rising for all.
The home state is not the issue. All the visitors generally hate each other all carrying old wounds with their cultural baggage
The myth of multiculturalism.
Culture is a response to environment and it is not static, it is in a constant state of change. If you change the environment the culture changes automatically. People who move to a new country can not bring their old culture with them because changing their environment automatically produces cultural change. But as they establish themselves in a new location they change the existing culture in the new location simply by being there i.e.: by changing the environment.
For these reasons the whole idea of multiculturalism is nonsense.
We need to get on with building a better society here and now and although we should respect the history of all of the people in our society this does not justify using "Multiculturalism" as a proper reason for anything.
Ethnostates or quasi-ethnostates aren't bad also 😊
from Japan
What are you going to do for your aging population if no one in that ethnostate wants to have babies, though? Serious question.
You’ll never hear this on MSM😡
Well articulated and nuanced. Migrants who come here must integrate and become Aussies while retaining their ethnic origins.
I knew this 20 years ago ! And every one said to me why not , well now look .
I really need to think about the over riding opinions expressed in the video. Many of the statements I tend to agree with however they tend to lack nuance. I have been following John Andersons RUclips for the past twelve months or so and while they can be quite interesting they are in my view a classic example of the echo chamber found on most Social Media sites. He only ‘interviews’ those who agree with his point of view. In many ways his channel is a form of confirmation bias. What would be extremely interesting would be for him to interview people with differing views on the same social topic. I like to have an informed opinion rather than an entrenched opinion. That would be educational and informative. Cannot see it happening unfortunately.
Well, say so here. If you think Kisin's concerns about multiculturalism lack nuance, provide some of you own here. Seriously.
The horrible tragedy here is that significant immigration preceded multiculturalism by many decades, so it isn't like the former inevitably implies the latter. Racism, completely normalised when I was growing up, made life pretty miserable for many immigrants, but (from an admittedly white position) I see that _largely_ as a solved problem today, and so there was a brief sweet spot in history when there was a relatively harmonious multi-ethnic society. But the cultural relativist and the guilt trippers and the we-must-atone brigades wouldn't settle for that, so here we are
Global village = Global riots
This made me realise that my country South Africa is a multicultural state trying to be a multiethnic state 🤔
Multicultural is cantradiction, as any person who knows a little about the study of cultures that is anthropology ..People develop their cultures for themselves to have a genaeral agreement about standards, manners, morals and law...For themselves, is the important phrase to note . They are often differnt and quite often contrary to another culture .Which means some cultures not different on basics can blend without too much strain tension or strife , Others do not, will not and actually cannot without throwing overboard basic beliefs , Most are very unwilling to do that and will tend to work hard to impose thier contradictions on a culture which finds that difference unacceptable , Why ? Because It would damage thier own culture badly -
Participant multiculturalism might be a useful way of describing this. People keep their cultural heritage but primarily participate in the overarching culture of the country they are in - for their greater benefit and everyone else's.
Yes it is the problem.
Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes. It is the problem
Anglo-Australia is tolerating itself out of existence.
Indeed we are we will be a minority in 20 years
The failure of Brexit has shown that greedy business owners are reliant upon cheap non-UK labour to plug their employment gaps and generate greater profits thus providing shareholder dividends and directors bonuses. Now that labour market has gone, they need to look at other ways to find a workforce and uninvited guests arriving daily upon our shores are seen as the answer to their prayers.
USA is or at least was the best example for his statement!
The USA is stuffed
"ECHR"?
European Court of Human Rights
I think
@@yoda3609 thanks!
Keep talking
Sweden ???...You mean Somalianland ;...where almost every body look like the Ancent Egyptians /or the Brazilians from the "Favellas"😠
If you leave your country to find a better life, embrace your new home, don’t try to change it to the country you left.
I believe in decentralized energy + efficiency: solar & wind.
Do you have any evidence for that belief, or is it just something you believe on faith because it sounds like it should be?
@@lesliemacmillan9932my evidence is my efficient lifestyle and my property. Its enough for me.
America was built on it
Maybe she should stand for PM
WE need to het out of the UN.
Konstantin is bob on. MONOCULTURISM.
Monoculture is the inevitable result of reasonable (small) volumes of migrarion. That's all you have to understand and think about, VOLUMES, nothing else. Small volumes = assimilation = monoculture.
World maps are divided into tribal zones otherwise known as countries. Each country or nation is a homogeneous society. Trying to change this is asking for trouble.
Define multiculturalism
Wasn’t it already there
English
Welsh
Scots
Irish
With small movements from the continent over hundreds of years that allowed for integration
Multiculturalism is just a political polemical word
The real damage is and was 1914 followed by 1939
I disagree I don't believe you should be celebrating your former heritage as if it's equal to your current loyalties. This kind of behavior breeds discontent by acknowledging that you're different. If everybody treats each other as an American then there's no difference based on race. When you start referring to yourself by your heritage you are ultimately referring to yourself as different than every other American.
I think Kisin is just tossing that out there to show he's not racist or xenophobic. The great strength of the United States was always exactly as you say: people became American. I don't think any other country does that so effectively. You are always creatively destroying and rebuilding things. It goes for culture, too.
What is the reason for the push for multiculturalism's.
If a government is paying for immigration which is the tax payers. Why ?
bringing in customers or labour force at the expense of the tax payers.
Australia uses Newcomers to pay pensions of old Europeans through tax
Do no say the quiet part out loud.
Culture is downstream from race. At the core of the problem is the fact there are great differences between the races.
Greeting from Poland! 🇵🇱 No multiculti, no problem.
Multi-ethnic, not multi-cultural. Culture isn't just about food and dance and costumes. Multi-culturalism is a crock.
Kisin - very good at talking and makes a career of it, but as he says - 'you want to be this or that - fine'. Which sounds all very reasonable - but is he providing a solution or way ahead? Nope, not a sausage, he's just re-iterating what some of us - often those who have matured and travelled widely already know - en-masse multiculturalism (read multi ethnic populations) has been tried for millennia worldwide and has ALWAYS led to envy, hatred and eventually strife. Cannot we recognise this, at last, for the benefit of all concerned and work instead in cooperation and trade as best we can?
Sweden has found out the hard way
Multiculturalism is the mortal sin of the successful society.
re Al Wilson - The Snake.
My personal opinion is the failure of multiculturalism as a result of some individuals all over the world may come in Australia illegally either by boat or by any other illegal ways wanting to share the Australian society in everything belong to the Australian society, but in fact they do not want the Australian society to share with them their own things. typical to those do not want to pay the right tax and those intend to act against the Australian society in drug trafficking, money laundry, and many other illegal things can destroy the Australian society at all times.
What growth in financial numbers? Immigrants that are coming in currently are not working even if they wanted to. I have no doubt that many really want to make a go of being in a prosperous country. I don't agree with coming in illegally and this should be dealt with by deportation if they are not genuine. But process these people so that the crooks are not being given a free holiday and those who are genuine get proper support to make a go of their lives and contribute to our societies.
BUT you come to Britain then you become British. No ifs and no buts. You get the perks and in return for the free health and education plus support from the state if you need it, then you pay tax and if it comes to it, you get called up for National Service. No preferential treatment. This is not a friggin holiday camp.
They are costing billions. If not trillions over the last 25 years. Both legal and illegal.
Multiculturalism is not easy but we need to go there since inevitably all races will disappear and everybody will be mixed because we will be a global community at some point(which we already are to some degree) and countries and races will be less relevant. All we can do at this point is slow that proces down. We where originaly black in Afrika, went north and spread around the world from there.. Mongolia being our home base..and we will end up being all of mixed race long time from now.
Years ago my parents sent me to a Catholic primary school then in Grade Six they switched me to the public middle school because "We want you to have Catholic friends but not only Catholic friends." My Chinese Filipino immigrant's son partner heard something similar when his folks moved him from a San Francisco area school that was "too Asian."
Multiculturalism means no cultural....
Basically, Britain needs someone with the political will to leave the ECHR. I presume he means European Court of Human Rights? If it’s forcing its signatories to accept unlimited amounts of migrants Britain absolutely must leave. What was the point of Brexit otherwise?
If you want to revive the White Australia policy, go ahead. Form a new Party, The White Australia Party, and go fundraising. If Aussies agree with you, they will support you. You can revive the suppression of Indigenous Australians too if you think we want that.
Leftists were against genocide before they were for it.
Shells bravermann isn’t English lol