@@MusicChannel-rf5zz I have two SD-1’s and I use them every week. From podcasts to vocal recordings to even as a snare mic at church. Now with this modeling software coming out soon I’ll definitely be using them for more things in the future
Good video. Something easy to confuse is what is off axis? With the mic at, say, 45-degrees from your mouth, this is still “on axis” (i.e. 0 degrees). That is, if the capsule is pointed toward your mouth it’s on axis. It the mic is rotated about its own cylindrical axis such that the capsule is rotated away from your mouth, even it the capsule is directly in front of you, only then is it “off axis”.
@theheatstudio question i thougjt bought getting sphere but in europe its 1500 € right now^^....i mainly use my earthworks for vocals and love it. Does this smaler version sounds as great as sphere if use it mainly for vocals and am fine with the smaller amount of mic models...coz i love the 8 choseb ones but wouldnt buy the mic if it sounds not rhat good then the sphere Thank you
That’s a great question, this microphone has the same emulations as the sphere but with a lot less features and models, I haven’t done a full comparison, but I’m planning to do one soon and post a video about it so I can’t tell you exactly how similar or different they sound but I can tell you that if you’re recording vocals mostly and don’t need multiple polar patterns or stereo recordings then the SC-1 is perfect
help me out i use mic behringer b1 i want to upgrade i don't Know which one should i get the avantone cv12 or Universal Audio SC-1 Plus the interface i use is Apollo solo
Does the hemisphere plugin go in the UAD console unison slot? I really want to use this through console for zero latency but all the demos seem to focus on using it in a DAW. Thanks!
Yes, you can do both. Just make sure to use the UAD monitor option in console so the mic model doesn’t get printed onto the track (unless you want that)
Buenas! ¿Para usar el Software "Hemisphere" es necesario tener una interfaz UA?¿o funciona con cualquier interfaz? En mi caso tengo una interfaz Arturia Aduiofuse Studio, y este micrófono me viene muy bien como sustituto de un Shure Sm7b, y con el modelado de micrófonos me aportaría una gran versatilidad. Un saludo y gracias!!!!
Hola! Para usar el software Hemisphere no necesitas una interface UA, lo puedes utilizar en cualquier programa de grabación y con cualquier interface. Saludos!
I use the hemisphere on all my mics to get whatever sound I’m looking for it’s great going to test out the sc1 and see if it like it dropping content on it soon
The following question arises: what happens with the coloration that the pre applies to the signal? The modeling is supposedly designed for the clean response of the microphone. This makes me doubt the accuracy of emulations using an external pre or a unison pre, for example.
Saludos bro. Tengo una pregunta? Compre este mismo mic, pero cuando bajo el app no me deja abrir el plugin para cambiar para los otros mics. Tengo que usar este mic con una tarjeta de UA?
Hola, puedes usar el plugin en tu programa de grabación sin tener una interface Apollo. Estás usando el plugin Hemisphere? Asegúrate de escoger el micrófono correcto que estás utilizando.
El micrófono puede ser usado con cualquier interface así que si ya la tienes entonces buenisimo, pero si estás buscando una interface nueva obviamente te recomiendo una UA!
I noticed that most of the gear reviewers (surely paid ad by UA/Sweetwater/GuitarCenter) show the mic with drums or guitars, but nobody on vocals, while singing. Is anything to worry about? Or does UA has anything to hide? Cuz surely there's a policy before making a review, what to say/show and what not.
Influencers choose what they want to record or show, UA doesn't demand anything so it's up to them. Most people choose drums or guitars because it's easier to show the difference between models since drums have a full frequency range plus you would have to either be a singer or hire someone else to sing in order to produce a video which makes things harder.
Technically, the correct answer here is SC-1 but if you have an untreated room and need more isolation I would choose the SD-1 so there is no right or wrong
It’s quite subtle in my opinion. Especially compared to the difference in models with the sphere. BUT, it’s a different build/ price point. Sounds good overall for the price
You said it best, the difference is subtle, Sphere mics are still UA's flagship when it comes to modeling. The differences are more noticeable when recording drums so I'm thinking of making a video soon. Stay tuned!
@@henrikpetersson3463 as a sphere owner myself, I respectfully disagree. The cage on each of their mics is different which can lead to different resonance results. I’ve done the comparisons. Additionally, the other mics are dual capsules, which allows them to model front and back. So for certain recordings I actually have used different polar patterns to get more or less room feel, depending on the desired taste. I haven’t used this mic yet, and it sounds good…but without the same components…there scientifically not going to be the same. And I’m not saying better or worse if you notice, just saying different my friend
If you had to give one CON about the SC-1 what would it be? As of right now the CON for me would be my wife getting really pissed at me for spending $650CAD before taxes on a microphone haha Looking for any reason to delay me from going out and buying it right now lol Also, if you had one microphone to choose in this price range, best bang for your buck (from UAD or other brand) what would you choose? I feel like this is a great option since you you get Hemisphere.
That's a really hard question lol. The only con I can think of is not having a pad so I can record loud sources but I used if for overheads and it sounded fantastic so not really needed. I don't think there's anything else in this price range with the amount of features so best bang for your buck for sure!
Yes absolutely, it’s a regular condenser microphone. Just keep in mind that in order to get the most accurate modeling with the hemisphere software you should use the cleanest preamp and no compression but don’t stop that from trying it out!
@@manykzdj792 that’s amazing gear, the Sphere gives you a huge variety of mics but if you want to use that vocal chain then a regular condenser mic will be better. I would recommend the Bock 187 as a great vocal mic
Two completely different microphones with different features. You shouldn’t worry about what’s better or worse because everything is completely subjective, you should be looking into what suits your needs for your studio
I appreciate your answer but it is very generic... I am asking from the perspective of sound quality. I dont have much knowledge about microphones but I would like to invest into something that is really really sounding good for the long term.. I'm looking for mic that has a very clear and warm sound.. to be good for rapping and singing styles of music... Would you be able to advise me on that, I would really appreciate your help @@theheatstudio 🙏
You were fiddling around with all the rotary dials too much to hear the Actual tone differences between the mic emulations . Makes it so confusing uneccessarily .
This is the lesser, lesser version of the original Townsend L22. You have the The Dlx and Lx which sound different despite having the same components using the same modeling technology and the SC - 1 is just a cheaper version of that which I don’t think any of the emulations with the SC-1 sound like the actual microphone it’s trying to emulate unlike the Dlx and Lx version. This is a gimmick for new engineers and artist thinking they’re even getting close to having these actual microphones in the locker. And to rephrase what I said in my 1st comment : The sc-1 sounds tiny on every emulation Nun of those mics in real life sound tiny….stick to the tried and true Slate modeling mic or the Dlx and lx version for the truest sound for what your going for.
Not true. They work very well as the differences between different microphones are small and mostly a frequency curve, here and there some saturation but very often not even that, no matter the microphone has a tube or a transformer. I hate those emulating plugins and U agree they are a waste of time and money, but after I measured many microphones and matched them with the eq I must accept the facts, purchasing different microphones just because of the 1 od 2 db frequency curve change is stupid.
This is the microphone I’ve been waiting for. All the essentials for $499 is awesome!
Exactly!!!!
Thanks for the great demo. This is perfect for most of the home studios and producers.
Thank you! I really appreciate it. The whole standard series became so much more powerful than it already was.
The Hemisphere plugin is huge. I already had the SD-1 and now UA just gave me another reason to pick up their new mic
Exactly! Now your mic became so much more!
How do you like the SD 1 & is the hemisphere modeling good as Slate?
@@MusicChannel-rf5zz I have two SD-1’s and I use them every week. From podcasts to vocal recordings to even as a snare mic at church. Now with this modeling software coming out soon I’ll definitely be using them for more things in the future
Do you use fetheads/mic lifter or any preamp to boost the sd-1 thinking of buying those..i have a Zoom L8 Livetrak Mixer/Interface.
Sounds warm. I like the tone for the voice and it's picking up the acoustic strings nice and fat!!!
Yeah I agree, this mic is beautiful!
Good video. Something easy to confuse is what is off axis? With the mic at, say, 45-degrees from your mouth, this is still “on axis” (i.e. 0 degrees). That is, if the capsule is pointed toward your mouth it’s on axis. It the mic is rotated about its own cylindrical axis such that the capsule is rotated away from your mouth, even it the capsule is directly in front of you, only then is it “off axis”.
@theheatstudio question i thougjt bought getting sphere but in europe its 1500 € right now^^....i mainly use my earthworks for vocals and love it.
Does this smaler version sounds as great as sphere if use it mainly for vocals and am fine with the smaller amount of mic models...coz i love the 8 choseb ones but wouldnt buy the mic if it sounds not rhat good then the sphere
Thank you
That’s a great question, this microphone has the same emulations as the sphere but with a lot less features and models, I haven’t done a full comparison, but I’m planning to do one soon and post a video about it so I can’t tell you exactly how similar or different they sound but I can tell you that if you’re recording vocals mostly and don’t need multiple polar patterns or stereo recordings then the SC-1 is perfect
help me out i use mic behringer b1 i want to upgrade
i don't Know which one should i get the avantone cv12 or Universal Audio SC-1
Plus the interface i use is Apollo solo
Hi, I would recommend the UA SC-1. By itself the mic sounds fantastic and when you use the app you get a lot more options.
Sounds really really good!
Thanks!!!!!
Great demo.
Thank you!
Amazing sound!
It sounds fantastic!
Does the hemisphere plugin go in the UAD console unison slot? I really want to use this through console for zero latency but all the demos seem to focus on using it in a DAW. Thanks!
Yes, you can do both. Just make sure to use the UAD monitor option in console so the mic model doesn’t get printed onto the track (unless you want that)
@@theheatstudio that’s great! Thanks for your quick reply!
Buenas!
¿Para usar el Software "Hemisphere" es necesario tener una interfaz UA?¿o funciona con cualquier interfaz?
En mi caso tengo una interfaz Arturia Aduiofuse Studio, y este micrófono me viene muy bien como sustituto de un Shure Sm7b, y con el modelado de micrófonos me aportaría una gran versatilidad.
Un saludo y gracias!!!!
Hola! Para usar el software Hemisphere no necesitas una interface UA, lo puedes utilizar en cualquier programa de grabación y con cualquier interface. Saludos!
This should be a huge upgrade from the mic that comes with the Volt 276 package, My Sc-1 just arrived.
Nice, congrats!
enjoy your show👍
Thanks!
I use the hemisphere on all my mics to get whatever sound I’m looking for it’s great going to test out the sc1 and see if it like it dropping content on it soon
THat's great to hear, did you get the SC-1???
Will I get the same quality on the SD 1 using the same mic emulations?
It woud be great if youi can compare the corresponding models with the Sphere LX and/or DLX. Thanks!
That’s a great idea, the Sphere is still superior and has a lot more features but maybe for a future video!
@@theheatstudio need this video!
Please hurry up and buy both the
Sphere LX and DLX and send to him so he can do the review.
@@jarexxsuvexx8212 I already have them 😁 now it’s just finding the time to do it
@@theheatstudio would love that comparison. Thx:)
Slate digital needs to do an update now
😂
Love it! 🎉
Thanks Montique!!! Trying to be as cool as you
The following question arises: what happens with the coloration that the pre applies to the signal? The modeling is supposedly designed for the clean response of the microphone. This makes me doubt the accuracy of emulations using an external pre or a unison pre, for example.
Saludos bro. Tengo una pregunta? Compre este mismo mic, pero cuando bajo el app no me deja abrir el plugin para cambiar para los otros mics. Tengo que usar este mic con una tarjeta de UA?
Hola, puedes usar el plugin en tu programa de grabación sin tener una interface Apollo. Estás usando el plugin Hemisphere? Asegúrate de escoger el micrófono correcto que estás utilizando.
Hola! Crees que este mic junto a la Audient ID4 MK2 sea un buen combo?
El micrófono puede ser usado con cualquier interface así que si ya la tienes entonces buenisimo, pero si estás buscando una interface nueva obviamente te recomiendo una UA!
Can you use this mic with the sphere plugin ?
@@ConfidenZe no, this uses its own software called “Hemisphere” that’s included.
would you recommend this or would you recommend saving up for the sphere?
Well it really depends on what kind of music/instruments you will be recording, if you are recording more than just vocals, I would suggest the Sphere
I noticed that most of the gear reviewers (surely paid ad by UA/Sweetwater/GuitarCenter) show the mic with drums or guitars, but nobody on vocals, while singing. Is anything to worry about? Or does UA has anything to hide? Cuz surely there's a policy before making a review, what to say/show and what not.
Influencers choose what they want to record or show, UA doesn't demand anything so it's up to them. Most people choose drums or guitars because it's easier to show the difference between models since drums have a full frequency range plus you would have to either be a singer or hire someone else to sing in order to produce a video which makes things harder.
Which one is better the SD-1 or SC-1 for vocals
Technically, the correct answer here is SC-1 but if you have an untreated room and need more isolation I would choose the SD-1 so there is no right or wrong
Considering that the plugin must be placed on the Apollo console first I would lose Unisson.
For the most accurate emulation yes
What is your Mic stand Tripod called please???
On Stage DS7425 great little mic stand, I've had mine for many years.
Hooooooly Sh*t!!! Looks AWESOME!
Simple and effective!
@@theheatstudio My favorite!!
My hearing must be bad. I couldn’t hear a difference between any of the models.
listen through monitors or good headphones
It’s quite subtle in my opinion. Especially compared to the difference in models with the sphere. BUT, it’s a different build/ price point. Sounds good overall for the price
You said it best, the difference is subtle, Sphere mics are still UA's flagship when it comes to modeling. The differences are more noticeable when recording drums so I'm thinking of making a video soon. Stay tuned!
@@jmclane27 The microphone quality should not make a difference to how much impact the emulation makes as long as it's clean and full range.
@@henrikpetersson3463 as a sphere owner myself, I respectfully disagree. The cage on each of their mics is different which can lead to different resonance results. I’ve done the comparisons.
Additionally, the other mics are dual capsules, which allows them to model front and back.
So for certain recordings I actually have used different polar patterns to get more or less room feel, depending on the desired taste.
I haven’t used this mic yet, and it sounds good…but without the same components…there scientifically not going to be the same. And I’m not saying better or worse if you notice, just saying different my friend
?? From the moment you use le SC-1 (through the Volt) there is a 1 sec "shhh" each time you stop talking... very strange, what is it please ?
That's actually my breathing lol, this mic is very sensitive so it picks up everything.
I have the new mic but I don’t know how to install the this plugin
Hi, go to www.uaudio.com and download the UA Connect software to register it and get the Hemisphere plugin
If you had to give one CON about the SC-1 what would it be? As of right now the CON for me would be my wife getting really pissed at me for spending $650CAD before taxes on a microphone haha Looking for any reason to delay me from going out and buying it right now lol
Also, if you had one microphone to choose in this price range, best bang for your buck (from UAD or other brand) what would you choose? I feel like this is a great option since you you get Hemisphere.
That's a really hard question lol. The only con I can think of is not having a pad so I can record loud sources but I used if for overheads and it sounded fantastic so not really needed. I don't think there's anything else in this price range with the amount of features so best bang for your buck for sure!
Sold! haha@@theheatstudio I think this will work out great since I have a bunch of SM57 to handle any loud recordings. This will be perfect!
@@Jcgalllo You can never have enough mics 😂
Can I use hardware preamp and compressor with sc-1?
Yes absolutely, it’s a regular condenser microphone. Just keep in mind that in order to get the most accurate modeling with the hemisphere software you should use the cleanest preamp and no compression but don’t stop that from trying it out!
@theheatstudio I got neve 1073spx and tube tech cl1b, I guess I shouldn't buy sphere l22 cuz it's stereo mic, will have to sell it then...thank you
@@manykzdj792 that’s amazing gear, the Sphere gives you a huge variety of mics but if you want to use that vocal chain then a regular condenser mic will be better. I would recommend the Bock 187 as a great vocal mic
@theheatstudio thank you for recommendation, I'll check it out
Will hemisphere work on other mics too?
No, it is designed only for the standard mics from UA
Thanks.How about the SD 1?@@theheatstudio
@@MusicChannel-rf5zz yes, Hemisphere is for all 3 standard mics (SD-1, SP-1, SC-1)
Could anyone advise me on, is this mic better then Lauten audio eden LT-386 ?
Two completely different microphones with different features. You shouldn’t worry about what’s better or worse because everything is completely subjective, you should be looking into what suits your needs for your studio
I appreciate your answer but it is very generic... I am asking from the perspective of sound quality. I dont have much knowledge about microphones but I would like to invest into something that is really really sounding good for the long term.. I'm looking for mic that has a very clear and warm sound.. to be good for rapping and singing styles of music... Would you be able to advise me on that, I would really appreciate your help @@theheatstudio 🙏
I liked the functionality of the Townsend better. UA did cut down on this as they took over this design. What a shame.
The Sphere mics are still superior, this is a whole different series. Not the same
You were fiddling around with all the rotary dials too much to hear the Actual tone differences between the mic emulations . Makes it so confusing uneccessarily .
I'll keep that in mind for the next one!
This is only for people who cannot move on within a production. For UAD fanboys only.
This must be modeling the other digital modeling mics on the sphere lol… don’t fall for this
These are the mics from the sphere. Not sure what you mean
This is the lesser, lesser version of the original Townsend L22. You have the The Dlx and Lx which sound different despite having the same components using the same modeling technology and the SC - 1 is just a cheaper version of that which I don’t think any of the emulations with the SC-1 sound like the actual microphone it’s trying to emulate unlike the Dlx and Lx version. This is a gimmick for new engineers and artist thinking they’re even getting close to having these actual microphones in the locker.
And to rephrase what I said in my 1st comment :
The sc-1 sounds tiny on every emulation
Nun of those mics in real life sound tiny….stick to the tried and true Slate modeling mic or the Dlx and lx version for the truest sound for what your going for.
🤭 *Promo sm*
Quite simply these mic emulations don’t work and aren’t worth the time or money
Not true. They work very well as the differences between different microphones are small and mostly a frequency curve, here and there some saturation but very often not even that, no matter the microphone has a tube or a transformer.
I hate those emulating plugins and U agree they are a waste of time and money, but after I measured many microphones and matched them with the eq I must accept the facts, purchasing different microphones just because of the 1 od 2 db frequency curve change is stupid.
Wrong lol