Judge Judy Orders Poodle Owner to Give Dog Back!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 янв 2023
- Jennifer bought a poodle and agreed to keep it as a pet but it had two litters. Now, the man who sold it to her wants it back!
#JudgeJudy
The Original! There’s only ONE Judge Judy. Visit our website for where to watch, weekdays.
Subscribe to Judge Judy on RUclips: / @judgejudy
She sold them. He found out. She is not worried about losing the dog. Glad he gets the dog back.
I think she’s not worried because think she will defy Judy’s order. She thinks there is no way Judy can take my dog. I want to see the look on her face when that Marshall shows up. “Puts there’s no penalty…”. I laughed so hard. She’s lucky Judy didn’t make her shave her head bald on national TV lol.
Watch, she is going to spade the dog before returning it.
Z1 1 k.f 1@@RLucas3000
@@xcutionunknown9634spay. A spade is a shovel.
Oh she got worried, but more because she then loses a breeding dog aka a way to make easy money to her. Once she had that threat she said she'd get the dog spayed probably figuring she would get have to prove it, but its too late she can't be trusted to do that after 2 litters by the same stud (I refuse to believe they were 2 different males that happened completely by accident)
I don’t believe she gave away puppies to family and friends . She sold them all
Of course she did, JJ just saved that dog from a life of constant overbreeding!
💯
Exactly. 2 litters and she gave all the puppies away. For free?!! 🙄 sure
She did look shocked that she wd have to give the dog back!!!!. Sweet!!!
She looked at the contract, she thought she was clever by the 'no penalty stated' thing, and bred the dog and sold the puppies. No way was there any 'accident', you don't just accidentally get the exact right breed of male wander into your garden, inseminate the bitch, and then wander off again. Not a chance.
Amazing coincidence the dog mated twice with other purebreds.
Crazy, right?
Such a coincidence this female unspayed poodle had accidents with other purebred poodles. What's the chances of that? 😂
She/her daughter owns it.
Planned accident.
Especially Standard Poodles, not that common anymore
She didn’t seem to be upset by the thought of losing her dog!
really. she was like "oh, thank god"
Oh I think she is just fuming.
Her daughters dog
Breeders... Smh
@@r.m.demeester1480 yes, fuming at losing her investment but not devastated at losing her fur baby!
Not an ounce of sadness when losing her puppy. This lady has no heart.
She probably has no intention of giving them the dog.. I wouldn't I'd just give it to someone to look after... Once u buy a dog it's urs no? Someone can't tell u what to do with something u own??
If someone tried to take my dog I'd fight them tooth and nail.. That's my baby absolutely not
@@juliekemp9979 Yes they can. Obviously. She’s a con. A terrible one at that. She could have paid more for breeding rights. She chose not to. That’s on the defendant.
@@juliekemp9979 You have fun trying to fight the armed Marshall/Sheriff, you go right ahead and do that. Best you'll end up in prison for assault of a police/peace officer, worst you'll end up shot and dead. But you do you.... idiot.
@@juliekemp9979 if she denies the Marshall that comes to homes to execute orders like this, she goes to jail and still must comply. If she gives the dog to a friend, she goes to jail and so does the friend (stolen property, interference, etc). She's now dealing with police in 5 days, not Judge Judy. You can tell someone what to do with everything they own.
I’m so glad JJ made her give the dog back, she was never going to fix the dog. She intentionally bred the dog and sold the puppies, it was no accident.
“Well, we’ll have to create one” JJ accomplishing more than the government 😂🙌
She always tickle me!🤣
No the woman breached the contract. She thought she was slick and she thought she would get a dog to breed without actually paying the higher price for a breeding dog. You know that was her intention because she didn’t spade the dog. Judge Judy just made sure a liar got their comeuppance 😊
@@gingercake0907present tense is "spay", past tense is "spayed"
I wish she could run for president cause heck I vote for her..
@@Transformers2Fan1 thanks. This is the lesson when you go on Judge Judy you have to get up pretty early in the morning to pull one over on and you still might not be able to do it. 😄
Her reaction at the end just proves JJ was right and she did not buy the dog as a pet but to breed it. She didn't care at all that the plaintiffs wanted the dog back. If that was a pet she would have been a lot more upset.
I wonder how the plaintiff found out the defendant was breeding the dog if she "gave the puppies away to friends and family" 🧐
probably through social media
An honest betrayer?
@@dinahbrown902 😂 A stupid betrayer! People post all kinds of personal information on their social accounts.
I’ve heard that some breeders will call and ask for verification of the dog being spayed/neutered…but it probably was figured out via social media. People post wayyyy too much online.
@@darlenefraser3022 They sure do
"That's RIDICULOUS!!!!" "Yes" gets me every time....
Right?!?
🤔🤨
She chose to ignore the contract and breed the dog thinking she would get away with it. Love how JJ ruled.
'given away to friends and family' I don't believe that for a second
She knew what she was doing and thought she'd never be found out
I’m shocked at how unsurprised she is that she has to give the dog back. If it were me I would have begged and pleaded and cried not to lose my dog. I would have asked to award the plaintiff $5000. Says a lot about her.
She was surprised.
for what?? 5000???
Her 'yeah' at JJ saying they'll have to create a penalty shows she didn't really think there'd be a consequence to breeding her dog purely because the contract didn't state there'd be a penalty, she was obviously told if she wanted to breed her dog she'd have to pay extra for the dog and just lied about it to get out of paying more or neutering/spaying her dog. Her offering to fix the dog after TWO litters isn't an acceptable penalty, I don't know what she was expecting
Bruh don't pay money you don't have.
Imagine if she spaded the dog before returning it lol, what a freak.
@@xcutionunknown9634it’s SPAYED.
In the 8 years of breeding my dogs I have only sold 3 puppies with breeding rights. However remembering this case I spoke with my attorney when we wrote the contracts and if they breed the dogs there is a penalty per litter. It doesn't matter if they sell the puppies or give them away. Even if the puppies die legally they owe me and it will stand up in court, and has stood up in court. I can guarantee you that this woman sold the puppies. You don't accidentally breed with another pure bred.
It's weird that as humans we either force animals to breed or take away their capabilities of breeding. But with that said, I find it ridiculous to sell dogs to people with a contract stating they can't have puppies of their own. It's sad that they want the dog back to basically force it to breed for their own purposes. A truly sad case for the animal. Puppy mills should be banned!
@bobbirfosho236 There is a world of difference between a puppy mill and a responsible breeder. A responsible breeder is only going to give breeding rights to somebody who actually knows what they're doing and knows what to look for in the breed instead of just breeding them because you have two dogs of the same breed. The purpose of breeding should always be to better the breed. I worked with breeders for years and still have mentors to help me pick out the best features and to breed to enhance the best features,health, structure and personality . You can't go on RUclips or tik tock and learn. The only way to protect the dog/breed is to deny breeding rights unless they can prove that they know what they are doing. As far as forcing them to breed, have you never been around dogs? There is no forcing involved, quite the opposite. I also don't necessarily support blanket spay/neuter for pets. Actually long-term reputable studies (UC Davis did a fantastic study) are very definitive that the longer you leave the dog intact the healthier the dog. However very few dog owners are responsible enough to handle intact animals.
Please adopt pets from Humane Society or other Animal Rescue Organizations. They also have Poodle Rescue center if one's desire a specific breeds.
Thank you! So many pure breds end up in shelters from breeders. We don't need more dogs when hundreds die daily.
@@80sGamerLady exactly!
I agree.
When a dog is aquired from anywhere, isn't that rescuing them? Aren't bred dogs just a valuable of a creature as one that was abandoned?
@@sharoncampbell4904 people breed dogs for their profit and selfishness.
I wish that her daughter would have thought deeper about what she was doing. But I have a feeling that the defendant is running a puppy mill. I feel bad for the dog.
100% she's running a mill.
This was educational. I was unaware that a seller can put such limitations on the reproduction of the pet, but i guess it was more about enforcing the contract which she broke.
Oh yeah, it is really common. It helps control the blood lines.
Prevents inbreeding
@@prabhjitsingh6135 The dog was too young at that time and no decent vet would have done it.
@@jedimasters1462 Nah, he said she had up to 12 months of age to have the dog spayed. That’s not too early.
@@darlenefraser3022 They sell the dogs at around 8 weeks and don't usually keep them until they are old enough to be fixed. The plaintiff couldn't fix the dog himself when he sold it before then.
The woman didn't even seem to be upset about losing her dog. She couldn't be too attached to the dog. Unbelievable how she has no feelings or sense to do what she was supposed to do, get the dog fixed.
She fully intended to breed that dog that is why the males are both poodles. She is absolutely shameless and clearly doesn't give a damn about her dog. She should not have dogs again
The dog is supposedly her daughter's, so maybe she isn't attached
Was her daughters dog and she was caught off guard about. The fact the judge is willing to take a dog from a. Family it's been with for 2 YEARS is disgusting. She made the wrong call.
I would be beyond devastated if I had to give any of my dogs back. Her daughter won’t be too happy with her. 🤷🏻♀️
@@connermasonsteven9221 - *Nah, you're wrong! I guarantee you that poor dog was forced to breed and they would have kept right on doing it if they weren't stopped! What's disgusting is you thinking it was ok for her to breech the contract and suffer no consequences!*
I feel sorry for that dog. This woman obviously doesn’t even care about it. And the dog isn’t going to understand why she has to go to a new home. Well hopefully it’s a lot better there. My goodness….
Well she's going from a mill back to her original caring breeder so I'd say she's moving on up! :)
The phrase " stud service" sound so sleazy.😄
Judy knows her dogs - both the 2 legged and 4 legged ones.
That lady is definitely a female dog…
. . . 🐶💋
Judge Judy is usually reluctant to give dogs back to plaintiffs once that dog has settled in with a defendant (and vice versa) whether there was a contract or not (she has said so many times). At least the defendant wasn't made to pay a monetary sum to the plaintiff in this case.
@@RoughJustice2k18 Why “at least the defendant wasn’t made to pay”? I think she should have also had to give him what she earned/could have earned (since she’s lying about selling them) from selling the puppies the dog had.
Yes she does 😊
These kind of people who purchase dogs just to make a buck off a PET piss me off. She bred the dog on her first season as well. This woman knew exactly what she was doing. And she’ll probably do it again. Should have had to return the dog and paid a penalty for each puppy.
This was an easy case for JJ. She has tons of dogs, has had dozens of interactions with breeders and has seen hundreds of cases regarding dog breeding/ownership. Definitely an easy one for JJ.
I am shocked she wasn’t upset about losing her. Wasn’t my dog and I don’t know these people and my heart stopped when she said the dog had to be given back. If that were me I would’ve become hysterical and begged for them to reconsider even if I made poor choices like she did. That’s unbelievable
Especially since she said it she bought it for her daughter! She has no emotions about ripping her child's pet away from her? She's lying. She bought the dog to breed and thought she'd get away with it. After the plaintiff found out, she decided there would be no penalty because one wasn't specified in the contract. There's always a penalty for breaking a contract, if it isn't specified then it's up to the courts to decide. Glad she lost the dog.
@@Mybpeterson I was going to say exactly that but you said it better lol 😄
I love judge Judy...no bullshit...straight to the point.. and fair😂🤯
Usually blunt but fair. I was shocked by the case of the homeschooler who worked for homeland security. Many agree she went off the rails on that one. She also seems to think that everyone receiving disability is a scammer.
Yeah, she 'forgets" to have the puppy spayed, and by some miracle the dog has two litters with a male poodle, then claims she gave the puppies away.
Everybody in the courtroom knew she was running her own puppy mill. I hope the dog finds a new home after being properly spayed. One where the family loves her instead of seeing her as a revenue source.
Adopt from shelters instead of partaking in this commerce
This was actually the most confusing case I've come across.... So they sold the dog to her for the purpose of having a pet.. in their contract which she signed, it was agreed that the dog is to be spayed/neutered no longer than a year... but she didn't do that. As a matter of fact it's been 2 years and she still hasn't got the dog fixed. She claims the dog getting pregnant TWICE was an "accident" but if it was an "accident" the first time then why didn't she make it her priority to get the dog fixed right after this point?? ... so yeah she was lying... because how can you say the dog "accidentally" got pregnant TWICE and you STILL haven't got her fixed?? And say "you were too busy " huh??? I would've immediately got her fixed after the first pregnancy if it were an accident because I wouldn't want to keep figuring out what to do with all these puppies.... so her reason was just a complete lie. Or if she didn't have the money to do it then she should've just said that because that's more believable to me than "I was too busy". I'm not THAT damn busy to have a female dog who keeps getting pregnant by my male dog 🤦🏽♀️ And I think it was obvious she intended to breed and make more poodles 🐩 because you already have a male one then you go and purchase a FEMALE ONE 🤔 😒 Why not purchase another male one if you didn't have intentions for breeding? Yeah, right.
You should probably watch again. The contract stated that the pup MUST be fixed, in less than a year time. Maybe that will remove some confusion for you because it's a very straight forward case, actually..
@Groo Wanderer Dominic got the gist of it correct. He might have accidentally typed NOT because the rest of his statement is correct
Yeah. One I heard that the dog was "accidently" impregnated by a white male poodle I knew it was planned all along. Too much of a coincidence.
@@amandas2541 well then he's not confused at all then. So why did he state it was the most confusing case ever? I was thinking maybe just a simple misunderstanding, but if he's not confused on that part then he's not confused at all.
Or, if you didn’t have the money to get her fixed, sell one of the first litter of puppies…
Breached a contract and expect no penalty? Doesn't say in contract? Really now?
As someone who has gotten a dog from a shelter and a breeder. You absolutely have to follow the contract. My contract with my lab mix from the shelter stated specifically to get her fixed. I was busy too. But I still found the time to get the dog fixed within 3 months of me getting her. When I got my labradoodle from a breeder stated right at the top of her contract that we had to fix the female doodle. Or the doodle would go back to the breeder. So I did that too. It's not that hard lady to get your dog fixed. I don't think she read the contract. I think she just signed it and right away as soon as she could bred the dog and sold all the puppies for profit because that's what she wanted to do. She had no attachment to that poodle. If I was just told by Judge Judy I had to give my dogs back. I would beg her to come up with another solution.
That's stealing and she should be on her way to prison
Please only deal with animals if you’ll give them love and compassion ❤️🐶
I love how they just ignored her as she would keep looking over there trying to start trouble.
give away, RIGHT! she made much $$$ from those litters.
Exactly, every word of of her mouth was a lie
@@RJWaynerium the fact that she broke the contract, say there was no consequences outlined. everything she mention after ubcan assume is a lie, the accident lol, the litters, the amount of pups, giveaway pups...for $$$ lol. her intention was to pay cheap for a pup she can bread.
My husband, being as kind as he was trying to be, bought me a very high priced male Maltese, and I told him it was that high of a price because of breeding, if it wasn’t for the fact that they sold us a sick puppy, my little man had Covid ,kennel, cough, pneumonia and three other things I can’t Spell LOL, after he got through that, I promptly got him fixed, and they had to pay him all the money back plus the vet bills, they would’ve put my sweet, sweet little man to sleep, he is now a little over a year and healthy as can be ,there’s enough dogs out in the world. Let’s enjoy the ones we have spay and neuter.👍🏻👍🏻✌🏻🐶💕
'oh I didn't know theywanted the dog back" lol
JJ is an absolute queen for that.
We all know she SOLD those puppies to "family and friends."
Oh absolutely, and her dog managed to have 2 "surprise" litters with another standard poodle that just so happened to wander into her yard and through the dog door
Not one other dog in the vicinity could smell her dog in heat and came to investigate? 🧐
@@thatvalensteingirl Excellent. You bet they can detect a bitch in heat from some distance away.
What a strange woman! No tears for losing the dog?!
for those who don't get it..
she had 2 choices pay full price for the dog with breading rights, let's say that's 2500$.
or pay a pet price that was 800$. but as a pet, you don't get to breed the dog.
she said: fine i ll pay 800, but i ll bread it anyway
If she was very smart and kept it quiet, plaintiff probably never would've found out. She seems to have some sort of connection with the plaintiff's partners and probably let it slip that she was breeding dogs...
@@manuelsoares9698 pretty sure she was advertising them to sell. i m 100% sure they wouldn't of cared if the dad was a stray..
I didn't know about these kinds of contracts, so thanks for the explanation. :)
Anyone buying would have required the AKC paperwork proving lineage. That's probably where she f'cked up. She didn't have the paperwork because he would be the one to give it to her. Not sure what else it involves, but I do believe it has to do with registering the puppies.
Breaded and fried
Wow! Interesting. I signed one of these contracts and the breeder needed to see the invoice from the veterinarian for the fee to neuter him in 6 months or I would be taken to court.
I love Judge Judy! She isn't playing.
Thank you Judge Judy !!!!!!
Love how she gave the dog back, too many people are not respecting the contracts they sign on puppies.
A gorgeous verdict.
In a lot of puppy contracts, they also take back all the litters or charge per puppy had.
The defendant “the contract here doesn’t state that there’s a penalty..”. Judge Judy. “Well. We have to create one…”. I lost it - 😂 😂 😂- I LOVE JUDGE JUDY.
If only there was a follow-up video on the collection of the dog.. 😂
Poor dog. So glad he is taking her back. This woman just used this poor dog to have litter after litter to make money. JJ should have asked which family members got the dogs and exposed the lie as well. So glad she took the dog back.
A one-part'r with swift justice. Fantastic!
Defendant fuming inside 😅😅😅
Lmao that “they dooooo???” Was comical.
She still won't be able to sell the dog with papers because she cannot get papers from him to show the pedigree of the dog. So she's still screwed. Her puppies cannot be sold as pure bred/registered.
"So what did you do with the puppies?"
"I GAVE, (seriously?!) GAVE them away to family and friends."
RIIIIIIIGGGHHHHHTTTTT
Judge Judy JUSTICE!! Nothing could be much harsher for a "pet owner" than having to surrender their "pet" after having it for 2 years! Somehow, though, I don't think this lady OR "her daughter" will shed a single tear.
Wow, Judge Judy kicks ass!
Dam well done on this case, should always make sure you have a penalty in a contract when it comes to selling a breeding dog. Glad she is getting the female poodle taken from her.
Defendant: “It’s a male poodle that got her pregnant.”
Everybody: … ????
2:44 The head throwing when she started talking about what she did with the puppies was the tell tale sign of lying for me.
“Just a second” 😂
I frankly don’t think that’s enough of a penalty. She already got 2 litters out of the dog.
Unfortunately because of the way the show is made, any financial penalty would have been paid by the producers. But in a just world she not only has to give back the dog but also is given a judgement against her, for the cost of a poodle x the number of puppies birthed. She said 5 dogs, $800 each (what she originally paid), so $4000.
i just got busy. girl bye 🤣🤣
Dog breeding is the shadiest and most inhuman business out there, all of them should be put out of business tbh
only $800 for a pure bred in 2015? My husband and I purchased Two Afghan Hounds in 1975 for $1000 @ I guess the price depends on how COMMON that particular breed of Dog is………WOW!
Dogs are just money and way to gloat these days, no longer loyal companions to people. Sad, but that's how it is. 😑
Not true. I have 3 dogs and I love and spoil the shit out of them. One is a long hair chihuahua, the other a pug, and my favorite is my maltise poodle. There’s no way in hell that I would allow someone to take my dogs. I love them as much as I love my kids.
Especially all French bulldog owners.
I’m disappointed that she didn’t have to pay money and give the dog back. I have a feeling that she’s perfectly happy with this because she can still breed the puppies when they become adults and sell them and she knows this.
IIR the contract on my dog, yes, she can choose to violate the contract, and breed the "pet" sold dog, but the puppies are NOT registerable at the AKC, no matter how pure their blood may be.
If she had to pay money then judge Judy show would have paid it… so what would be her consequence? Lol
She lost the initial 800 dollars and the dog
Usually u sign that u will have 'PET' SPADE. I SIGNED AN AGREEMENT LIKE THAT IN EARLY 90S.
It's weird that as humans we either force animals to breed or take away their capabilities of breeding. But with that said, I find it ridiculous to sell dogs to people with a contract stating they can't have puppies of their own. It's sad that they want the dog back to basically force it to breed for their own purposes. A truly sad case for the animal. Puppy mills should be banned!
Best episode so far short and fast
Has everything!
Hope it gets 1,000,000 views
I’d be crying my eyes out.
"I got busy" yea busy making money...couldn't even be bothered to lie lol
Thanks
Well that escalated quickly!
Giving the dog back is crazy 😂😂
She seemed to not care too much for the dog to not get emotional in giving up the dog... Looks like all she wanted to do was breed the dog... No emotional attachment!
Is this a repeat upload? Story sounds too familiar.
I don't like it when dogs are being used to make money.
Wow her sorrow for losing her pet dog is just gut wrenching 🙄
No tears about losing her dog? So it wasn't a pet, just a breeding machine.
God I love judge Judy
Wow! Taking an adult dog from their owner. She is has lost her mind!
I understand that animals are considered property. However they have feelings. When JJ made her decision, I immediately wondered about the emotional impact on the dog.
I don’t know what to think about the defendant’s lack of emotion. I think she never expected that decision and it happened so quickly she was shocked.
Also the poor dog will be still used simply as a breeding dog, just by a registered breeder. No happy result here at all
Well she's going from a heartless puppy mill to a living home where she won't be bred into oblivion. Better I think.
Should have been registered with NFB on the mother's birth certificate - Not For Breeding. This means that there will be no official pedigree certificates for the progeny registration.
Wowzer 😮
The defendant's excuses are ridiculous. She just happened to have a male poodle, and there was an oopsie breeding? Right 🙄😠. Returning the do is the LEAST she should have had to do. There should have been a per puppy penalty from her whether she sold or gave away the dogs, and any puppy still in this cheat's possession should have been taken away and given back to the breeders.
I checked. Litter size is usually 7 puppies on a standard poodle. it had 2 littlers. They sell puppies at $800 each. I'd ding this person the full $5000 she could (even though the total would be $11200) and tell them to go to court to get more if this person gets more puppies from the dog. Lets see how much life gets in the way or accidents happen then!
2 years?? And already 2 litters. A dog of 2 years is much to young to have already 2 litters
A “stud service” is just a dog brothel. Insane
Wait, out of curiosity, why can’t you breed your own pet if you wanted to? Why would anyone sign a contract stipulating that?
This lady knew exactly what she was doing she just got caught that's all !!
4:09 Paying careful attention is not the defendant's strongest suit.
What would that make a difference, she already got a litter with 1 on hand that she can now keep and also breed, so how does she loose in this? She will make up for it by breeding and selling the litter the next time around. She should have had to Give up all pups, even the ones she gave away to the original seller.
Maybe that way, she would fall into consequence of everything done and the backlash.
She "forgot" to get the dog fixed but conveniently she bred with not 1 but 2 white poodles?
The fact that the defendant shows zero emotion about giving the dog back shows that she is not attached to the dog, and only bought it to breed. I doubt it is only two litters, and I bet she sold every puppy to the highest bidder. She couldn't care less about the dog.
Strange case, strange defendant!
She should have been penalized financially because it’s obvious that she was making money off of the dog
Give the dog back plus a fine would have been better.
Just having puppies for the sake of having puppies is ridiculous. Just them having "property" to use, abuse, and squeeze out what u can 💵
I'm so upset how ppl can't take care these beautiful animals. Horrible. That lady irritated me!!!!!!
2023 and I'm still waiting for a reason, a single valid reason, to buy a dog. Gimme one. Just one.