Battletech's Year of the Dragon! DRG-series Dragon and Grand Dragon!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 янв 2025

Комментарии • 31

  • @WolfHreda
    @WolfHreda 11 месяцев назад +4

    The fact it took the DCMS until the Fourth Succession War to be like, "Hey, we're House Kurita, we fucking love PPCs. We should put one on the Dragon." is kinda crazy.

  • @ogrehaslayers605
    @ogrehaslayers605 11 месяцев назад +5

    The Dragon is one of those mechs that doesn't look very impressive on paper, but it performs very well.
    The Grand Dragon is a scary machine.

  • @Eulemunin
    @Eulemunin 11 месяцев назад +2

    The basic chassis is good, fast heavy without going too fast. But the Combine was the mooks of early Battletech. So they got less than ideal mech load outs.
    But then the upgrade started, Grand Dragon. Love that mech, but we would pull a ML for more armor. Then the tech revolution, so glad for double HS. And the lack of DHS for the Combine just shows that they are still the mooks.

  • @chrissheffield5468
    @chrissheffield5468 Год назад +5

    There are two things to give the stock 3025 Dragon for tabletop game play. 1.) You will not run out of ammo for primary weapons. 2.) You are virtually guaranteed to not overheat (barring multiple engine hits).

    • @ProfessorHeyTeeEn
      @ProfessorHeyTeeEn  Год назад +2

      It's really not that bad overall "in the era", but the first version of the Grand Dragon, even though it might overheat, I think is more relevant as a threat on the field.

  • @mikealpha2611
    @mikealpha2611 11 месяцев назад +1

    The Sidewinder is pretty great refit really like it. It is a fast hunchy at that point so yea good.

    • @ProfessorHeyTeeEn
      @ProfessorHeyTeeEn  11 месяцев назад

      It is better than most "modern dragons" and most modern Hunchbacks, which is sad.

    • @mikealpha2611
      @mikealpha2611 11 месяцев назад

      True at least when it comes to Hunchbacks they cost less but yea the "modern dragons" make me kinda sad.@@ProfessorHeyTeeEn

  • @DIEGhostfish
    @DIEGhostfish Год назад +2

    15:12 Faster than the Wyvern IIC or the Corvus, those are old IS Style 4/6 troopers. But intended for cityfighting and not bad at it wince the Wyvern IIC is 4/6/4.

    • @ProfessorHeyTeeEn
      @ProfessorHeyTeeEn  Год назад

      That's an era I haven't played in a lot to be honest.

    • @DIEGhostfish
      @DIEGhostfish Год назад

      @ProfessorHeyTeeEn I mean, they're just old clan mechs. (Though from the 3060 book) sadly not many seem to have made it sphereward.

  • @ChaosTicket
    @ChaosTicket 11 месяцев назад +4

    The Dragon is a mech that is hard to sell. As a 60tonner, its inbetween solid medium mechs and stronger/tougher heavy mechs, making it a Master of None.
    It actually makes me appreciate the Shadow Hawk which has 3 Jump Jets to the Dragons' 0 JJs.
    3025 is a particularly flawed era as so many units have autocannons on various sizes but little in the way of a benefit. The lack of ammunition for a Primary weapon is just silly. AC-2s and AC-5s are particularly inefficient in terms of damage.
    The Grand Dragon fixes a key problem, swapping the AC-5 with a PPC and adding2 Heat sinks. Now at least it can run and shoot its PPC.
    Lostech heavily favors bad designs from 3025 by allowing double heat sink, extended range Large Lasers and PPCs, and possibly Extralight Engines to have high speed without sacrificing firepower or armor.

    • @ProfessorHeyTeeEn
      @ProfessorHeyTeeEn  11 месяцев назад

      The Grand Dragon is generally much better than the regular Dragon. If you have access to LosTech, Sidewinder is actually a scary brawler.

  • @jollyjohnthepirate3168
    @jollyjohnthepirate3168 Год назад +2

    I always used the Dragon the way you'd use a heavy medium mechs. Griffins, Wolverines and Improved Shadow Halks are it's running mates.

    • @ProfessorHeyTeeEn
      @ProfessorHeyTeeEn  Год назад

      As a Command 'mech for a Cavalry or heavy scout Lance, it works quite well.

  • @daduronronron3955
    @daduronronron3955 11 месяцев назад +2

    You sound Norweigan, dontchaknow. You from Rasalhague?

    • @ProfessorHeyTeeEn
      @ProfessorHeyTeeEn  11 месяцев назад +2

      Nah, originally French Canadian now residing with other Travellers in the rimward periphery.

    • @daduronronron3955
      @daduronronron3955 11 месяцев назад +1

      Oh Canadian, eh. Take off, hoser! Or is that so 1980's

  • @ftako9028
    @ftako9028 Год назад +6

    Grand Dragon > regular Dragon.

    • @ProfessorHeyTeeEn
      @ProfessorHeyTeeEn  Год назад +4

      Very few people would disagree with that. Even the primitive Grand was better than the Dragon.

    • @jeffersonian000
      @jeffersonian000 Год назад +1

      @@ProfessorHeyTeeEn
      I concur. The DRG-1G is my bully Mech supporting my Panthers, which I will field companies of in our big games. My favorite mod is the drop the LRM10 for three LRM5’s, and to move the rear ML to the left arm. It increases its through weight while also increasing endurance as you can lose two launchers and still keep lobbing missiles. But just having a PPC increases the Dragon’s endurance by a lot, with the added benefit of doubling its main weapon firepower.

    • @robrib2682
      @robrib2682 Год назад +1

      @@jeffersonian000 well if we're allowing custom mechs you can make the shadowhawk into a viable weapons platform, but that does sound good :p

    • @jeffersonian000
      @jeffersonian000 Год назад

      @@robrib2682
      BattleTech has always been a game with customization as viable for game play. It’s only been over the past few years that I’ve noticed a bias against customization, which seems dumb given the entire point behind Omni’s is regulating customizations. There seems to be this need for people to dictate what I can play, for no reason. If we are agreeing to a standard amount to build to for play, it shouldn’t matter what I or you do to mod our mechs as long as it’s legal and within our agreed upon limits. The mod I talked about out above an easy field refit that anyone can do, and specifically with the medium laser is mod that’s in the Tech Readout.

    • @robrib2682
      @robrib2682 Год назад

      @@jeffersonian000 dude, I was trying to poke fun at people who seem to think that you can't break out those rules and say that you had a nice mech variant.
      Like seriously the dragon doesn't get as much love as I believe it should just because of how undergunned it is from the official variants

  • @derekburge5294
    @derekburge5294 Год назад +5

    Ah, the fast heavy... Cool idea, seldom works for crap.

    • @ProfessorHeyTeeEn
      @ProfessorHeyTeeEn  Год назад +1

      Unless you have an XL engine, it generally isn't worth it, to be honest.

    • @cobalt968
      @cobalt968 Год назад

      It works okay as cavalry, like a fat medium mech supporting the DCMS light mech formations; either providing fire support with Panthers, or moving to engage enemies to draw attention off of Panthers or to supplement Jenners. Though in my experience you have to be comfortable with the idea of melee combat to get the most use out of the Dragon in the Succession Wars era.
      Some of the later variants can get pretty nasty, such as the Gauss dragon and the 12K Grand Dragon. A fast gaussboat is always useful, and a clantech weapons platform that can run up to 12 hexes can outflank heavier assets pretty easily, or kick/charge lighter mechs that underestimate its speed.

  • @joshuamidgette4846
    @joshuamidgette4846 Год назад +1

    Fast Heavy mechs are not all that good, Fast Assault is Very Good. Battlemaster is Excellent.

    • @ProfessorHeyTeeEn
      @ProfessorHeyTeeEn  Год назад +4

      At 4/6 under 90 tons, it's not really "fast assault" and more "mobile assault". Fast Assault would be those 5/8 80 tonners or those 4/6 100 tonners...