When you poured it onto your hand and I saw nothing. I thought of tale of "The Emperor's New Clothes", you buy a bottle of invisible chalk, rub it in mentally, and you climb better because you paid $25 for a small bottle. That would have been a great april fools video.
Reminded me of aerogel! Just a little cloudy and slightly tinted in bulk. I have a friend who never chalks and this could sway a lot of those people. I'll probably pick some up. $25 isn't THAT bad for an experiment. I've bought and DIY'd liquid chalk, so I'm always game to FA&FO.
Love the video, can see 3 big areas where this could be good: 1. Base layer - just use it in combination with chalk, so you get benefits of both, optimal performance with chalk and still good layer when it wears off during longer climb. 2. Competition ice climbing - yes, we ice climbers use liquid chalk inside our gloves! That makes it impossible to rechalk during a climb which can be up to 8 minutes. So this might be a good alternative. 3. Sandstone climbing - in the Czech and Saxon sandstone areas, chalk is forbidden in order to not leave a trace and also not damage the rock. If this stays on your hands and does not transfer to rock, this might be a great option compared to not using chalk at all.
@@snadornear the German board along the Elbe valley. Here on the German side it’s Saxon Switzerland, over the boarder is Bohemian Switzerland. I think the general area is Elbe sandstone mountains. I was climbing there today and no chalk does influence the climbing but I will admit the visual impact is greatly reduced
@@snador Well chalk is banned in czech on sandstone in general. There are some areas where it is allowed or tolerated, but vast majority has it banned.
@@mmoss1490 I have! That’s what I usually do actually and I do think it works wonders for people with sweaty hands. But even liquid chalk still needs reapplying from time to time and all, so this could be a good alternative
Silica effect on the respiratory system is very well documented, it’s only safe when applied in a way that won’t reach ur lungs- not sure of this product’s safety in the long term. That said, I’m curious how this would feel if you apply this with slightly moist hands lol
@@Natemitka it would probably work great for deep water soloing, since the water wouldn’t affect it. I wonder if you could waterproof shoes without ruining the rubber texture
Cristalline silicon dioxide causes Silicosis, due to the needle-like shape that can damage lungs if breathed. Particle size also plays a role in how damaging it is. However other types of silicon compounds are quite different, and do not always causes issues. I am not saying that the product is safe, I don't know if they passed any necessary certification to say so, but It could be misleading to directly compare it to cristalline silica.
@@thommey8688 The issue is the body not being able to remove the silica compounds and the resulting issues(chronic tissue distress). Research suggests SDS deposits in the lung can be semi-permanent/long term and also wander off into mediastinal lymph nodes. The only misleading thing here is the bottle saying "non-toxic" when toxicology isn't the only issue. It's like saying "my fist is non-toxic" before punching someone in the face.
I've seen a few comments on safety concerns since this product contains a form of silica, but according to the MSDS of silica silylate, it's fine as long as you don't light it on fire. My bigger concern would be the long term effects of anything besides magnesium carbonate chalk on natural rock. Some companies sell chalk with a rosin additive and some climbers have in the past been certain that they discovered the new perfect climbing moisture absorber with rosin. For the most part, people who swear by rosin tout the same benefits as this product: consistent moisture absorption and grip enhancement without the chalky residue. The problem is, rosin builds up on the rock over time and makes it slick as hell. Not saying that silica silylate will have the same effect, I haven't used it, but studying the long-term effects on routes might be a good idea. Also, FWIW, generic silica silylate is waaay cheaper if you were to get it from makeup suppliers. Generic will run $6 for a 29g package vs $25/8g package for this stuff. Take that with a grain of salt though as I haven't looked into that at all beyond the price.
I think adding a super small amount os super finely ground dry rosin to this would be great it wouldnt be near enough rosin to leave behind like any of it amd would mimic the tack feeling of super dry hands from chalk. Like add less than 1% of the total volume.
@@tylerm124Tiny amounts of rosin still build up is the issue. I reckon mixing it with a small amount of chalk could be an alternative, or using CL as a base layer, I've seen other comments mention that
Chalk get dissolved in the water. Also chalk was examined and it doesn't do damage in our lungs (minor irritation only). I think it's important if you stay hours weekly in that kind of environment. I would say I would prefer to breathe in good old chalk then unknown silica particles
I wouldn't be so sure about long term effect of chalk inhalation. People in mines get a fatal disease from inhaling rock dust called Silicosis. But well that's from silica's dust so perhaps chalk is safer..
I think there's some good information here that could be applied to harder climbing. He says his fingers are moist feeling, a little tacky. I would expect this to help improve friction in certain conditions on slopers and slopey crimps, especially when it's very dry or cold conditions and the rock is feeling glassy. But it would decrease performance on smaller sharp holds where that super dry, hard finger tip is important. Depends on the conditions and the route, and of course, each climber's skin.
@@chazott I feel like anything v9 or above needs a certain level of dryness for most climbers. Although people's skin conditions differ, I was more wondering if this would even be a viable option in general for any climbing v9+ friction wise (though I understand it could have some specific or niche applications).
@@pierremilot8117 I know some V12 climbers who put water on their hands before chalk or instead of chalk. Everybody is different. Too much chalk can cause excess dryness and splits. Carlo Traversi talked about using wet chalk (not liquid chalk) to send a highly friction dependent V16 FA in Yosemite. I'm sure he wouldn't be doing that if it was razor crimps. But yeah, jury is still out on this stuff and how it would fit in the mix, if its safe to use.
I wish you would've tried this on more friction based boulders like some really bad slopers or tiny crimps. Or maybe even just compare on a beastmaker and check if it helps to hold on the 45.
Silica instantly raises my hackles, silicosis is a big issue in comstruction. Apparently this is a well known product used already in make up and is created to be non lumg damaging but i still think about the sheer abount of chalk on everything and cringe
@@Tyler.8046 - the stuff gets airborne 100% - how do you think it is applied - as shown, you pour into your hands and then you rub it 'in' - in this process 100% some particles get airborne - so on every use you get some into your lung.
@@Syntax1963A So, I did more research on this, and you're just wrong. Not only is this not crystalline silica, it's silica silylate which has published studies showing it's safe in concentrations as high as 25%. Additionally, these studies were largely conducted for use in cosmetics which are applied directly to the face. So, not only would I expect this use case to be safe, it's arguably safer than its typical use case. Anyone arguing that silicosis is a serious concern with this product is almost certainly fear mongering because it's a new and unknown product.
I was thinking it was aerogel too. I once ordered a sample of aerogel based insulation blanket and in the bag it had lots of 'powder', after handling it I had very dry hands and also read it was a serious desicant. I did try it down the wall once and it was ok. It's weird stuff!
maybe a good option for people that dont like to use chalk, or because the skin goes too dry, but really dont think is something that will replace normal chalk in any way.
There’s still a huge variable in how locked in he is and how recovered he is, muscular, cardiovascular, and neurological recovery all come into play. In other words, it’s not that deep dawg. You’d know if this worked better for you during your warmup.
Honestly, it scares me that people could start using this and I could be exposed to it unwittingly in climbing gyms. Its bad enough that there's extremely high levels of aerosolized rubber in indoor climbing gym air, now we're going to add a chemical with questionable safety studies and chemically similar to a known carcinogen?? The studies I read only tested aerosolized impacts 3 months out, with the longest test range being 24 months for reproducive effects in mice. This just seems woefully insufficient. Additionally, I have very little faith in safety records of "new chemicals"... My mom's a nurse and she had plenty of patients - young men - dying of silicosis. She also told me about the link between baby powder and ovarian cancer 30 years before the big lawsuits. Anecdotal, I know, but this very much informs my opinion on these things; that often it takes many years before a safety warning is issued from goverment groups. Ex) just because aerosolized products like spray deodorants and febreeze, which we know are dangerous for our lungs, are still on shelves, doesn't mean they are safe. And you can still buy baby powder... people are just now getting concerned about phthalates, which weve known forever are dangerous... etc. etc. A bit of a worried ramble, but in conclusion I just find it really concerning that this video promotes a possibly dangerous product and was published by someone who clearly has zero knowledge about the danger of silica (see comments).
Would like to think about the long term use of this on real rock, especially sandstone and slate, would you think a build up on the holds would be an issue? also the use of brushing with this / the overall performance of an outdoor hold of this pre/post rain and wind.
5 месяцев назад+8
It might be also a gamechanger in fragile areas where ethics does not allow chalk (eg. some sandstones in Czechia and a few adjacent sectors in Poland)
you should try this but with real skin tests like a timed sloper, timed hangboard and other things like that, i think the giant ball would be a great test as well
So I just had a gym session yesterday and tried both, I still found myself having to chalk up a decent amount, because the chalk still will wipe away from the climbing holds. But that said I was sweating a fair bit because I was doing higher volume with lower rests and I didn't notice my hands sweating that much. It was pretty similar to what I experienced from my first test in the video!
I have some heavy concerns about this. I am quite confident that this product is based on aerogel, which is a silica (pure glass if you will) foam. when you rub it in your hands I think what covers your hands will be nano and micro glass particles, which isnt too great but at least it will be hard for the glass to penetrate. BUT this stuff can fly in the air like dust (glass dust) and get in your lungs, from where it most likely will never retrun from. Same for ingesting it through your mough when you fall on the mat that is still covered in that micro glass dust, where it slowly over the years will accumulate in your lungs. I didnt do any reasearch, but these are just my thoughts. But I think I am not too far off with my assumptions. Also: Regular chalk doesnt have that accumulation problem in the lungs and body because normal chalk to my knowledge consists of MgCO3, which can be slowly dissolved by the cells in the body.
As a climber with sweaty fingers I am very interested in trying this stuff. I do really enjoy the feeling and effectiveness of chalk, but I'm fascinated by new technologies like this!
Slightly skeptical about the silica part. It's deemed safe in most applications due to not being aerosolized. But this seems to be much easier to become airborne which could raise issues when being used by multiple people in a climbing gym. Excited to see something this game-changing come to the sport though!
Nah, if its enough to act as an ablatiolve layer you are over chalked, magnesium carbonate is commonly used as a lubricant so excessive chalking is worse than non at all and why we brush holds.
You're right on the money about the psychological aspect of it. Human's by nature are ritualistic and that does affect our mindset and performance. That would always edge out chalk for me because I am used to that ritual of study the route, psyche up, chalk up, and send.
My friend let me try his sample. I thought it was pretty nice on a moon board session. I think I used more then recommended and may be a nice test for you to see if it feels better. I did apply another layer of real chalk about halfway through my session and felt good for much longer than expected.
I know a few shotputters who use an absurd amount of chalk like 2-3 bricks per session, I'd be really interested to try for shotput specifically for putting on my neck.
I feel like this would be great if you paired it with chalk. You could put it on first and then put chalk on and it would help prevent the actual chalk from coming off as much as normal
I know! I tried it a bit in the gym two days ago and I still found myself chalking up a decent amount even with the Chalkless underneath. But I probably chalked up less than if I was just using chalk!
Great idea. I haven't really noticed much of a difference between using this with wooden holds like on my hangboard and plastic like you'd find in a gym. But I'll be sure to give this a try!
Ya i as thinking this really needs to be tested on crimps and slopers over juggy holds and could get a better comparison testing on hangboards for this.
That looks like an Aerogel of some kind. Reasonable chance your hands are completely waterproof after application. there's an action lab video of a guy in a pool coated in an aerogel
So if you read the patents quick, they are claiming to use areogel, which would indeed be pricey stuff. If you dig deeper, this is going to perform exactly the same as a product called silica silylate powder, which is an anti-caking agent used in cosmetics. You can buy a volumetric gallon of the stuff for the same price if you know where to shop. You could potentially also use something called "fumed silica", which would be similar, but cheaper; it's used as a universal thickening agent. But I wouldn't recommend applying it indoors without a fine particulate-mask for concerns of lung damage over time.
I usually cimb without chalk and it's not so bad (unless the boulder is extremely hard/sweaty). There's so much chalk on the routes that your hands are quickly covered anyway. See after your first route your hands are already quite covered. So I think you could have rubbed your hands with air it would still be not so bad.
I’m genuinely curious about this product because, as a climber who sweats near 0% of my hands, I use chalk to prevent my skin from being used too quick. So my question is: did you feel like you used much more skin than usually? and was the feeling more painful when slipping off some ruggish holds?
Very thoughtful review, thanks! I am very curious whether it would play well with chalk before or after. I already use a liquid base coat and top off with a chalk sock. I wonder if this would behave similarly, but require much less topping up.
This stuff looks like powdered aerogel which is a gel made from silica and alcohol evaporated in a particular way. It is $23,000 a pound. But there is more than one kind of aerogel and because they are not making large unbroken chunks it is probably far easier to make, though still difficult. There is an old science RUclipsr video of him visiting a manufacturer of aerogel. The let hims have about a pound of aerogel dust, which had no market for use. He rubbed it on his legs and stepped into a pool, where you could see it caused his legs to become hydrophobic and no water touched the legs leaving them reflective like a bubble.
I have two questions: 1) It seems very chemical, how safe do you think it is? Can it causes skin cancer, hormones disturbance etc? What was the safety protocol and is there enough study? 2) Can you combine it with chalk / liquid chalk? That seems like the most interesting use case for me. That way you don't need to always chalk up on easy boulders when warming up and always have an OK grip even when chalk is gone and can't chalk up again.
Nice video. The only other aspect I would have liked to see is before you washed it off you could have tried using chalk while this was still on your hands. May have to test this out
Thanks! I have another video I'm working on where I test just this! The long story short is that I don't notice as big of a difference with Chalkless + Chalk as I do with just Chalkless or just Chalk.
So what if you used this under normal chalk as like a safeguard to keep your hands at least somewhat at all times "chalked" per say could be interesting for pro climbers when doing a long route and run out of chalk towards the top
Maybe combining it is the way to go. apply a base layer in the beginning of the session and then keep using regular chalk (but less thereof) throughout :D
Silica is really bad for lungs if inhaled… And I wonder what would happen to the holds if everybody used this stuff? And what about the safety of the dust puffing up off the floor and being inhaled two or three times a week after a year of its use by the majority visiting the gym? For example, Australia has banned the use of man-made ‘stone’ kitchen surfaces. Not because of the danger of manufacture (which is dangerous, but done in controlled spaces), but because of the long term exposure to the silica dust in the middle-man environment. There, it’s cut to size for each kitchen (and note: the advice is to use ppe to cut this stuff and it’s those who neglect to do that who are getting lung disease; hence it’s use being completely banned by Australia as they don’t believe it can be controlled outside of a factory). Many other countries have specific strong regulation about the containment of silica based dust (US, U.K., Canada, EU, Australia). So, is this silica stuff so different we don’t need to worry? Note, there was no legislation anywhere about cutting man-made stone kitchen surfaces until enough lives had been ruined that something was done. Sorry to be such a downer: but if it’s safe in this environment, presumably the manufacturers has published the tests IN THIS ENVIRONMENT that show it’s not like other dusty silica environments and thus safe to puff up off the mats after a year or two and be inhaled (as a result of, for example, most choosing to use it and it just getting everywhere as that almost invisible form it arrives in). Finally, much will be made of there being ‘no dust’ as, “it’s all rubbed onto the hands…”. Well, yea, right, that’s going to happen… You can barely see it and some people will not rub it in correctly and others will accidentally drop some etc, etc…
@@thelelanatorlol3978 It dissolves in water and can be cleared by the body. It has been studied and approved for gyms. The problem with silica is that it doesn't dissolve and this product has not been studied. No one is even sure exactly what it's formulation is!
I also question the health aspects, but would be great to have an alternative for outdoor climbing as I'm really not a fan of seeing natural boulders defaced by climbing chalk.
this seems like aerogel....I just finished a project where I used a ton of aerogel pellets and even though man this is like chalk but makes my hands even stickier. Silica Gel should definitely not be breathed in. It's totally safe on your hands, but if you are clapping your hands and create a cloud or drop the bottle it's really bad for your lungs. Not sure if this is truly non toxic. It's similar to Asbestos, asbestos could be considered non toxic if you don't breath it in. It doesn't hurt you at all to hold or handle, but is dangerous for your lungs.
What I am really interested in is how much chalk I use on average per session, and whether this is more cost effective to use for the average session if you only have to apply once and get roughly similar results. Another thing I thought about was how since you arent using a ton of chalk this way, you'll likely not have to brush off boulders as often while projecting.
If its oleophillic then itll definitely rub off on the holds as you climb. All the oils and skin cells of other climbers that coat the holds will definitely cause the silica to bond/dissolve onto the hold.
How is it on dual-texture holds? It is well known that non-chalked hands can have an advantage at these. Perhaps this is a good mix between dry hands for normal holds and not too dry for smooth holds? And it would be nice to see how it affects the holds long-term, does it spread to the holds such that they get (a bit) water-resistent? Will it be a problem for cleaning them?
Do you think it is a good substitute to liquid chalk? In europe we begin to have more and more climbing gyms where liquid chalk is mandatory, which I hate because I feel like liquid chalk is considerably worse than normal chalk. I would like to hear your thoughts on this. Great video and thanks for the cool new information!
It's hard to comapre the two, I've used liquid chalk in the past and never really liked using it that much. My impression is that liquid chalk would make your hands feel drier at first, but Chalkless would make your hands feel drier over an entire climbing session or entire climbing route.
It would be interesting to se how this performs on a long lead route outdoors with rock that has been baking in the sun all day. If it can keep you dry then I would be majorly impressed and truly be called an innovation
Rhino skin products can already do this (antihydral). But they can have adverse affects on the skin, that varies with each climber. This stuff may have adverse affects on the rock, I'd really like to know the long term effects before people start using it all over the place.
What if you mix? Apply the Chalkless, and then re-chalk (with the normal chalk) before every bolder? Does the Chalkless remain staying on your hands? Does the grip become better than just with Chalkless? Or, maybe, even than just with the normal high quality chalk? And the second question is just about the same, but about combining the Chalkless with liquid chalk. And the last question is kinda dumb, but you couldve guessed it: what if we combine all three? For example, some world class climbers do combine liquid chalk and normal one, and I do this as well from time to time, and it does have its benefits over just the normal chalk, imo. Mainly, its the longjevity (you've mentioned about this problem of a usual chalk in this video btw).
This is really neat! I definitely want to try it for working out. A couple of questions. 1. How would it work mixing the 2? Not to be a jerk, but i feel like you kinda did mix them with the amount of residual on the wall. (Not hating just observing) 2. How did it feel last run compared to first run of just the "chalkless"? Thanks for the video!
@@Natemitka Thanks! Looking forward to learning more. I heard some liquid chalk brands have been using resin, which leaves residue that fills in the texture :'(
DO NOT USE THIS INDOORS. Silicosis is a big problem. Do not use this indoors. This goes for any chalks with silicon based drying agents. At the climbing gym I manage and route set at, this very much not allowed to be used
News flash any small particle can cause silicosis Your car realeses a whole bottle of this stuff every time you start it up and then your AC spews thousands of HEPA particles all over you killing your indoor plants and giving your pets cancers Sorry but if you are worried about things that can kill you don't look into the amount of pesticides in our water that cannot be boiled out and how we treat our water with bleach
Careful spouting nonsense. Amorphous silica gel is not harmful to lungs like crystalline silica dust.... it is just really expensive. There are lots of hydrophobic coatings, but chalk is the cheapest. This product is nonsense. I wish them well with marketing...
I hope you realize that silicosis is just one type of pneumoconiosis, you can develop pneumoconiosis from inhaling chalk dust as well, on a consistent basis. Limestone miners get this sometimes (sometimes called calcicosis, from calcium carbonate in limestone, or calcite) any mineral dust is bad for your lungs long term.
Yeah right!? I tried it two days ago with chalkless AND chalk and I found it worked just OK, it wasn't a magical breakthrough. I noticed chalk kept sliding off of my hands and I had to re-chalk more than I would expect with the double up.
If a small amount of super fine ground rosin was added to it would probably be better for climbing and you could add probably nearly none to it just to sort of mimic the tackyness of super dry hands from chalk.
I wonder how it would feel on Wood holds, I feel like those are a better measurement of more perfect rounded edges and way more reliant on skin friction
What residue does it leave behind? Many liquid chalks contains resins/gums that build up outside on the rock and can turn natural holds into glass. It can't be easily brushed away unlike traditional chalk and thus should not be used outside.
Have you since tried chalk over chalkless? I would love to know if that makes the chalk last longer/reduces the change as you go through a route without re-chalking
I've tried this the past few months and it works, but it's not as effective as just using Chalkless by itself, or using chalk by itself. Basically, the Chalkless stuff will wear down by the friction of the holds.
how about combining both ? I have really sweaty palms and need to use excessive ammount of chalk, but if this chakless keeps hands drier, maybe it could lead to using very little amunt of chalk, for that extra dryness feeling
I am thinking what is the effect on the rock quality on outdoor climbing. I mean on some of the rock types it is not allowed (or ethically not allowed) to use chalk. E.g. on Andesite the chalk is closing the small channels inside the rock and that make it more greasy/slippery. It might happen with other rock type with the usage of this new "chalkless" product.
I wonder how this affects the holds. Will it cause holds to lose their grip over time because it builds up in the gaps? Or could it make the climbing shoes to have less grip?
Thanks for biting the bullet for us 😂. I think there's may be a mechanical aspect to regular climbing chalk. There's definitely a psychological component
The claim that it doesn't need to be reapplied is certainly false. Skin wears off during climbing, this stuff would go with it. But it may delay the application frequency and work well in certain applications. I'm curious but cautious about using it until I understand what the risks are to human health and the rock.
Did you try it with chalk? Using chalkless as a base and then only minimal chalk throughout the session. Chalkless would go hard in DWS, no more soggy chalk bags!
The algorithm sent this to me because I climb. But I don’t use chalk. lol It always makes my hands slick. My hands are very dry and rough. Unsure if that is relevant to why. I keep a towel with me to clean off chalk from hands and holds.
This reminds me a lot of "colloidal silicon dioxide" powder. You can buy it for indigestion, should probably be cheaper, and I'm curious how it compares to that chalkless stuff
Another thing is if everyone is using this would it affect the holds? Cuz it looks like a plasticky slightly gel like substance and inevitably some will be left on the holds, I think? So if everyone is rubbing this gel off on the holds then would it make the holds themselves more slippery? Like leftover chalk on holds, but with this you can’t brush it off easily
How does it behave when building up on a hold. If an entire gym of climbers used it on a hold would we be able to brush off any build up like with chalk? Would we even need to?
Is this safe to breath? Although it's safe in makeup and shampoo, the quantity is really low. Would pure silica silylate be safe to use? Feel like chalk is much safer.
Is it just silica??? Because usually water resistant products have a forever chemical called PSFA that can cause all sorts of things like cancer. In CA we are very slowly starting to try to ban this chemical but that’s my only concern
Someone should make edible chalk that tastes like chocolate and is named chalkolate
I like the way you think
I think you're onto something...
So just like, cocoa powder?
Wait, isn’t chalk already edible? I’ve been eating it for years for extra performance 😶
Wow❤
When you poured it onto your hand and I saw nothing. I thought of tale of "The Emperor's New Clothes", you buy a bottle of invisible chalk, rub it in mentally, and you climb better because you paid $25 for a small bottle. That would have been a great april fools video.
Hahaha thats great. I had to film the B-roll shots of the Chalkless stuff on a black mat in low light just to get it to show up on camera!
I had to look at the upload date just in case it was april 1st
@@Marta1BuckSame 😂
Reminded me of aerogel! Just a little cloudy and slightly tinted in bulk. I have a friend who never chalks and this could sway a lot of those people. I'll probably pick some up. $25 isn't THAT bad for an experiment. I've bought and DIY'd liquid chalk, so I'm always game to FA&FO.
Love the video, can see 3 big areas where this could be good:
1. Base layer - just use it in combination with chalk, so you get benefits of both, optimal performance with chalk and still good layer when it wears off during longer climb.
2. Competition ice climbing - yes, we ice climbers use liquid chalk inside our gloves! That makes it impossible to rechalk during a climb which can be up to 8 minutes. So this might be a good alternative.
3. Sandstone climbing - in the Czech and Saxon sandstone areas, chalk is forbidden in order to not leave a trace and also not damage the rock. If this stays on your hands and does not transfer to rock, this might be a great option compared to not using chalk at all.
Which sandstone areas in czech ban chalk?? I will probably visit one of them in a few months :)
@@snadornear the German board along the Elbe valley. Here on the German side it’s Saxon Switzerland, over the boarder is Bohemian Switzerland. I think the general area is Elbe sandstone mountains. I was climbing there today and no chalk does influence the climbing but I will admit the visual impact is greatly reduced
@@snador Well chalk is banned in czech on sandstone in general. There are some areas where it is allowed or tolerated, but vast majority has it banned.
In saxonia an ascend with that stuff wouldn’t count because of tradition, lol
Seems like a major assumption that using this stuff where chalk is banned is okay tbh
If this is actually safe, using it as a first layer and adding chalk on top might be a game changer for me
Have you tried putting some liquid chalk on first?
Yes definitely want to hear the review of this 👆🏾
@@mmoss1490 I have! That’s what I usually do actually and I do think it works wonders for people with sweaty hands. But even liquid chalk still needs reapplying from time to time and all, so this could be a good alternative
this
Isnt it airogel i mean that’s know to be highly hydrophobic and heat resistant and unbelievably light plus it has a simile colour/ look
Silica effect on the respiratory system is very well documented, it’s only safe when applied in a way that won’t reach ur lungs- not sure of this product’s safety in the long term. That said, I’m curious how this would feel if you apply this with slightly moist hands lol
I'll give this a try and also try pouring water on my hands!
@@Natemitka it would probably work great for deep water soloing, since the water wouldn’t affect it. I wonder if you could waterproof shoes without ruining the rubber texture
Cristalline silicon dioxide causes Silicosis, due to the needle-like shape that can damage lungs if breathed. Particle size also plays a role in how damaging it is. However other types of silicon compounds are quite different, and do not always causes issues. I am not saying that the product is safe, I don't know if they passed any necessary certification to say so, but It could be misleading to directly compare it to cristalline silica.
@@thommey8688 The issue is the body not being able to remove the silica compounds and the resulting issues(chronic tissue distress). Research suggests SDS deposits in the lung can be semi-permanent/long term and also wander off into mediastinal lymph nodes. The only misleading thing here is the bottle saying "non-toxic" when toxicology isn't the only issue. It's like saying "my fist is non-toxic" before punching someone in the face.
@@HighGravityDay As he said in the video, they already put silica silylate in cosmetics that people rub all over their face.
I've seen a few comments on safety concerns since this product contains a form of silica, but according to the MSDS of silica silylate, it's fine as long as you don't light it on fire. My bigger concern would be the long term effects of anything besides magnesium carbonate chalk on natural rock. Some companies sell chalk with a rosin additive and some climbers have in the past been certain that they discovered the new perfect climbing moisture absorber with rosin. For the most part, people who swear by rosin tout the same benefits as this product: consistent moisture absorption and grip enhancement without the chalky residue. The problem is, rosin builds up on the rock over time and makes it slick as hell. Not saying that silica silylate will have the same effect, I haven't used it, but studying the long-term effects on routes might be a good idea. Also, FWIW, generic silica silylate is waaay cheaper if you were to get it from makeup suppliers. Generic will run $6 for a 29g package vs $25/8g package for this stuff. Take that with a grain of salt though as I haven't looked into that at all beyond the price.
Rosin is bad for rock and frowned upon in the climbing community
@@davidk3567 That was the point of the comment.
I think adding a super small amount os super finely ground dry rosin to this would be great it wouldnt be near enough rosin to leave behind like any of it amd would mimic the tack feeling of super dry hands from chalk. Like add less than 1% of the total volume.
@@tylerm124Tiny amounts of rosin still build up is the issue. I reckon mixing it with a small amount of chalk could be an alternative, or using CL as a base layer, I've seen other comments mention that
@jamieallan2859 fair I'm not a climber so don't have intimate knowledge of chalks and such.
Chalk get dissolved in the water. Also chalk was examined and it doesn't do damage in our lungs (minor irritation only). I think it's important if you stay hours weekly in that kind of environment. I would say I would prefer to breathe in good old chalk then unknown silica particles
Chalk was unknown to you until you got to know it lol.
I wouldn't be so sure about long term effect of chalk inhalation. People in mines get a fatal disease from inhaling rock dust called Silicosis. But well that's from silica's dust so perhaps chalk is safer..
@@pierreboyer9277we can break down and dissolve chalk. Can’t say the same for silicosis
@@thelelanatorlol3978sure and once this has been properly, scientifically vetted, it will also be known to me.
Would love to see a higher end climber / climbing that relies on friction more with this product and how it compares.
I think there's some good information here that could be applied to harder climbing. He says his fingers are moist feeling, a little tacky. I would expect this to help improve friction in certain conditions on slopers and slopey crimps, especially when it's very dry or cold conditions and the rock is feeling glassy. But it would decrease performance on smaller sharp holds where that super dry, hard finger tip is important. Depends on the conditions and the route, and of course, each climber's skin.
@@chazott I feel like anything v9 or above needs a certain level of dryness for most climbers. Although people's skin conditions differ, I was more wondering if this would even be a viable option in general for any climbing v9+ friction wise (though I understand it could have some specific or niche applications).
@@pierremilot8117 I know some V12 climbers who put water on their hands before chalk or instead of chalk. Everybody is different. Too much chalk can cause excess dryness and splits. Carlo Traversi talked about using wet chalk (not liquid chalk) to send a highly friction dependent V16 FA in Yosemite. I'm sure he wouldn't be doing that if it was razor crimps. But yeah, jury is still out on this stuff and how it would fit in the mix, if its safe to use.
2:55 im thinking powdered aerogel
That was my immediate thought and would explain the price
Yeah that's what I thought when I saw it.
*Summons Veritasium*
I wish you would've tried this on more friction based boulders like some really bad slopers or tiny crimps.
Or maybe even just compare on a beastmaker and check if it helps to hold on the 45.
Silica instantly raises my hackles, silicosis is a big issue in comstruction. Apparently this is a well known product used already in make up and is created to be non lumg damaging but i still think about the sheer abount of chalk on everything and cringe
I didn’t know this. Very interesting. I’ll have to look into this! Thanks!
I wonder if the particles are large enough to not be dangerous?
@@somanayrThey'd have to be airborne, which doesn't seem likely, although I'd be careful about touching your face and eyes
@@Tyler.8046 - the stuff gets airborne 100% - how do you think it is applied - as shown, you pour into your hands and then you rub it 'in' - in this process 100% some particles get airborne - so on every use you get some into your lung.
@@Syntax1963A So, I did more research on this, and you're just wrong. Not only is this not crystalline silica, it's silica silylate which has published studies showing it's safe in concentrations as high as 25%. Additionally, these studies were largely conducted for use in cosmetics which are applied directly to the face. So, not only would I expect this use case to be safe, it's arguably safer than its typical use case. Anyone arguing that silicosis is a serious concern with this product is almost certainly fear mongering because it's a new and unknown product.
cool i didn't think that aerogel powder would work as "chalk"
It was pretty surprising to me!
I was thinking it was aerogel too. I once ordered a sample of aerogel based insulation blanket and in the bag it had lots of 'powder', after handling it I had very dry hands and also read it was a serious desicant. I did try it down the wall once and it was ok. It's weird stuff!
maybe a good option for people that dont like to use chalk, or because the skin goes too dry, but really dont think is something that will replace normal chalk in any way.
Good for gyms that don’t allow chalk too
You really should do this test over 3 days; normal chalk, no chalk, the new chalk. Then repeat the exact same routes each day
There’s still a huge variable in how locked in he is and how recovered he is, muscular, cardiovascular, and neurological recovery all come into play. In other words, it’s not that deep dawg. You’d know if this worked better for you during your warmup.
I thought from the thumbnail is was a gas and I was thinking “we have solid chalk and liquid chalk now we have gas chalk??”
Honestly, it scares me that people could start using this and I could be exposed to it unwittingly in climbing gyms. Its bad enough that there's extremely high levels of aerosolized rubber in indoor climbing gym air, now we're going to add a chemical with questionable safety studies and chemically similar to a known carcinogen??
The studies I read only tested aerosolized impacts 3 months out, with the longest test range being 24 months for reproducive effects in mice. This just seems woefully insufficient.
Additionally, I have very little faith in safety records of "new chemicals"... My mom's a nurse and she had plenty of patients - young men - dying of silicosis. She also told me about the link between baby powder and ovarian cancer 30 years before the big lawsuits. Anecdotal, I know, but this very much informs my opinion on these things; that often it takes many years before a safety warning is issued from goverment groups. Ex) just because aerosolized products like spray deodorants and febreeze, which we know are dangerous for our lungs, are still on shelves, doesn't mean they are safe. And you can still buy baby powder... people are just now getting concerned about phthalates, which weve known forever are dangerous... etc. etc.
A bit of a worried ramble, but in conclusion I just find it really concerning that this video promotes a possibly dangerous product and was published by someone who clearly has zero knowledge about the danger of silica (see comments).
I absolutely agree. Classic magnesium caused me an allergy years ago. I can't breathe it in closed spaces. I can only climb outside.
Would like to think about the long term use of this on real rock, especially sandstone and slate, would you think a build up on the holds would be an issue? also the use of brushing with this / the overall performance of an outdoor hold of this pre/post rain and wind.
It might be also a gamechanger in fragile areas where ethics does not allow chalk (eg. some sandstones in Czechia and a few adjacent sectors in Poland)
For sure, I used to climb on sea cliffs in northern Minnesota that had a no-chalk ethic and I always hated how sweaty my hands would get!
If chalk isn’t ethical in a circumstance, i don’t think you can assume that this stuff is ethical.
you should try this but with real skin tests like a timed sloper, timed hangboard and other things like that, i think the giant ball would be a great test as well
I wonder how it would perform using both, this to decrease overall sweat levels but chalk to maximize performance
So I just had a gym session yesterday and tried both, I still found myself having to chalk up a decent amount, because the chalk still will wipe away from the climbing holds. But that said I was sweating a fair bit because I was doing higher volume with lower rests and I didn't notice my hands sweating that much. It was pretty similar to what I experienced from my first test in the video!
I was thinking about mixing some chalk into the stuff to see if it still works well and lasts longer
I have some heavy concerns about this. I am quite confident that this product is based on aerogel, which is a silica (pure glass if you will) foam. when you rub it in your hands I think what covers your hands will be nano and micro glass particles, which isnt too great but at least it will be hard for the glass to penetrate. BUT this stuff can fly in the air like dust (glass dust) and get in your lungs, from where it most likely will never retrun from. Same for ingesting it through your mough when you fall on the mat that is still covered in that micro glass dust, where it slowly over the years will accumulate in your lungs. I didnt do any reasearch, but these are just my thoughts. But I think I am not too far off with my assumptions.
Also: Regular chalk doesnt have that accumulation problem in the lungs and body because normal chalk to my knowledge consists of MgCO3, which can be slowly dissolved by the cells in the body.
As someone with sweaty hands, I wonder if the two combined would provide a benefit compared to having to re-chalk mid-problem on trickier climbs
Try your antiperspirant and see?
As a climber with sweaty fingers I am very interested in trying this stuff. I do really enjoy the feeling and effectiveness of chalk, but I'm fascinated by new technologies like this!
Slightly skeptical about the silica part. It's deemed safe in most applications due to not being aerosolized. But this seems to be much easier to become airborne which could raise issues when being used by multiple people in a climbing gym. Excited to see something this game-changing come to the sport though!
Chalking up isn't just about friction and/or sweat... it's also a sort of ablative layer so you're not constantly losing skin layers.
Nah, if its enough to act as an ablatiolve layer you are over chalked, magnesium carbonate is commonly used as a lubricant so excessive chalking is worse than non at all and why we brush holds.
I think it's not because it's ablative, but because dry skin is stronger than moist skin. Could be both idk
I tried this today and WOW it was amazing, my hands are very wet when they sweat, this powder is the solution.
Nice! Sounds like a huge improvement! Were you climbing when you tried it?
"Lets dehydrate", I like this phrase ;)
You're right on the money about the psychological aspect of it. Human's by nature are ritualistic and that does affect our mindset and performance. That would always edge out chalk for me because I am used to that ritual of study the route, psyche up, chalk up, and send.
3:30 it's hard to hear your voice because of the loud music. Super weird looking product, I hope to try it once one day 😍
I think we would all love to see a video on its performance in combination with chalk!
My friend let me try his sample. I thought it was pretty nice on a moon board session. I think I used more then recommended and may be a nice test for you to see if it feels better. I did apply another layer of real chalk about halfway through my session and felt good for much longer than expected.
Do you think applying more than recommended was better for you?
@@Natemitka I thought it was great out of the box so maybe. It felt nice and grippy for me
I know a few shotputters who use an absurd amount of chalk like 2-3 bricks per session, I'd be really interested to try for shotput specifically for putting on my neck.
I feel like this would be great if you paired it with chalk. You could put it on first and then put chalk on and it would help prevent the actual chalk from coming off as much as normal
Never tried it rock climbing, but I’ve used it for powerlifting (deadlifts) and calisthenics. Replaced liquid chalk for me for my workouts.
That's awesome to hear, I was curious for how it would work for other sports like weight lifting or tennis
You gotta try it as a base layer! Like how people do with liquid chalk
I know! I tried it a bit in the gym two days ago and I still found myself chalking up a decent amount even with the Chalkless underneath. But I probably chalked up less than if I was just using chalk!
Would also be cool to do some comparisons between hangboarding etc with this or your go-to chalk
Great idea. I haven't really noticed much of a difference between using this with wooden holds like on my hangboard and plastic like you'd find in a gym. But I'll be sure to give this a try!
@@Natemitka could just be more "scientific" to compare hang times imo due to less variables than with actual climbing?
Ya i as thinking this really needs to be tested on crimps and slopers over juggy holds and could get a better comparison testing on hangboards for this.
That looks like an Aerogel of some kind. Reasonable chance your hands are completely waterproof after application. there's an action lab video of a guy in a pool coated in an aerogel
So if you read the patents quick, they are claiming to use areogel, which would indeed be pricey stuff. If you dig deeper, this is going to perform exactly the same as a product called silica silylate powder, which is an anti-caking agent used in cosmetics. You can buy a volumetric gallon of the stuff for the same price if you know where to shop. You could potentially also use something called "fumed silica", which would be similar, but cheaper; it's used as a universal thickening agent. But I wouldn't recommend applying it indoors without a fine particulate-mask for concerns of lung damage over time.
I usually cimb without chalk and it's not so bad (unless the boulder is extremely hard/sweaty). There's so much chalk on the routes that your hands are quickly covered anyway. See after your first route your hands are already quite covered. So I think you could have rubbed your hands with air it would still be not so bad.
I’m genuinely curious about this product because, as a climber who sweats near 0% of my hands, I use chalk to prevent my skin from being used too quick. So my question is: did you feel like you used much more skin than usually? and was the feeling more painful when slipping off some ruggish holds?
Just bought some through your link, looking forward to trying it out especially as a combination with chalk!
Started to wonder if it was the 1st of April 😅
Very thoughtful review, thanks! I am very curious whether it would play well with chalk before or after. I already use a liquid base coat and top off with a chalk sock. I wonder if this would behave similarly, but require much less topping up.
I dont use liquid chalk so hard to say! I should try some of that out
Is this like the powder version of aerogel
Was going to say/ask the same. Definitely looks like aerogel, and many aerogels are silica based.
1000% This is an aerogel and can be mixed with your fav chalk for extra grip.
Gotta wonder what the particle size is on that stuff because if you grind up silica small enough its very dangerous.
This stuff looks like powdered aerogel which is a gel made from silica and alcohol evaporated in a particular way. It is $23,000 a pound. But there is more than one kind of aerogel and because they are not making large unbroken chunks it is probably far easier to make, though still difficult. There is an old science RUclipsr video of him visiting a manufacturer of aerogel. The let hims have about a pound of aerogel dust, which had no market for use. He rubbed it on his legs and stepped into a pool, where you could see it caused his legs to become hydrophobic and no water touched the legs leaving them reflective like a bubble.
Veritasium is the science channel you are thinking of
I have two questions:
1) It seems very chemical, how safe do you think it is? Can it causes skin cancer, hormones disturbance etc? What was the safety protocol and is there enough study?
2) Can you combine it with chalk / liquid chalk? That seems like the most interesting use case for me. That way you don't need to always chalk up on easy boulders when warming up and always have an OK grip even when chalk is gone and can't chalk up again.
Stop being afraid of chemicals. You are entirely made of chemicals. Everything is chemicals.
This will probably be a game changer for urban bouldering; areas where you don’t want to leave any sort of trace that you were ever climbing there.
There are some outdoor climbing areas where chalk is banned and this could be a good alternative too.
Nice video. The only other aspect I would have liked to see is before you washed it off you could have tried using chalk while this was still on your hands. May have to test this out
Thanks! I have another video I'm working on where I test just this! The long story short is that I don't notice as big of a difference with Chalkless + Chalk as I do with just Chalkless or just Chalk.
That stuff looks trippy as hell
So what if you used this under normal chalk as like a safeguard to keep your hands at least somewhat at all times "chalked" per say could be interesting for pro climbers when doing a long route and run out of chalk towards the top
tip for sand bag.
throw a wristband or sock in there. and grip it. noice coverage ;)
I didn’t like it for climbing, but is amazing for lifting weights. I too tried it at the outdoor retail show.
Oh awesome!
Maybe combining it is the way to go. apply a base layer in the beginning of the session and then keep using regular chalk (but less thereof) throughout :D
Silica is really bad for lungs if inhaled… And I wonder what would happen to the holds if everybody used this stuff? And what about the safety of the dust puffing up off the floor and being inhaled two or three times a week after a year of its use by the majority visiting the gym? For example, Australia has banned the use of man-made ‘stone’ kitchen surfaces. Not because of the danger of manufacture (which is dangerous, but done in controlled spaces), but because of the long term exposure to the silica dust in the middle-man environment. There, it’s cut to size for each kitchen (and note: the advice is to use ppe to cut this stuff and it’s those who neglect to do that who are getting lung disease; hence it’s use being completely banned by Australia as they don’t believe it can be controlled outside of a factory). Many other countries have specific strong regulation about the containment of silica based dust (US, U.K., Canada, EU, Australia). So, is this silica stuff so different we don’t need to worry?
Note, there was no legislation anywhere about cutting man-made stone kitchen surfaces until enough lives had been ruined that something was done.
Sorry to be such a downer: but if it’s safe in this environment, presumably the manufacturers has published the tests IN THIS ENVIRONMENT that show it’s not like other dusty silica environments and thus safe to puff up off the mats after a year or two and be inhaled (as a result of, for example, most choosing to use it and it just getting everywhere as that almost invisible form it arrives in).
Finally, much will be made of there being ‘no dust’ as, “it’s all rubbed onto the hands…”. Well, yea, right, that’s going to happen… You can barely see it and some people will not rub it in correctly and others will accidentally drop some etc, etc…
The chalk used in climbing isn't particularly good for your lungs either. Also the toxicity of silica heavily depends on what kind of silica it is.
@@thelelanatorlol3978 It dissolves in water and can be cleared by the body. It has been studied and approved for gyms. The problem with silica is that it doesn't dissolve and this product has not been studied. No one is even sure exactly what it's formulation is!
Also, if it get's onto holds and then is brushed off into micro particles.
I also question the health aspects, but would be great to have an alternative for outdoor climbing as I'm really not a fan of seeing natural boulders defaced by climbing chalk.
this seems like aerogel....I just finished a project where I used a ton of aerogel pellets and even though man this is like chalk but makes my hands even stickier. Silica Gel should definitely not be breathed in. It's totally safe on your hands, but if you are clapping your hands and create a cloud or drop the bottle it's really bad for your lungs. Not sure if this is truly non toxic. It's similar to Asbestos, asbestos could be considered non toxic if you don't breath it in. It doesn't hurt you at all to hold or handle, but is dangerous for your lungs.
What I am really interested in is how much chalk I use on average per session, and whether this is more cost effective to use for the average session if you only have to apply once and get roughly similar results. Another thing I thought about was how since you arent using a ton of chalk this way, you'll likely not have to brush off boulders as often while projecting.
This is really cool! haha I like the base layer idea most people gave
If its oleophillic then itll definitely rub off on the holds as you climb. All the oils and skin cells of other climbers that coat the holds will definitely cause the silica to bond/dissolve onto the hold.
the oil and sweat also comes from your hands... so by that logic your hands would just reject it
I’d be interested in seeing a mix between the two
How is it on dual-texture holds?
It is well known that non-chalked hands can have an advantage at these. Perhaps this is a good mix between dry hands for normal holds and not too dry for smooth holds?
And it would be nice to see how it affects the holds long-term, does it spread to the holds such that they get (a bit) water-resistent? Will it be a problem for cleaning them?
Would love to try this out, going to go try some soon!
Do you think it is a good substitute to liquid chalk? In europe we begin to have more and more climbing gyms where liquid chalk is mandatory, which I hate because I feel like liquid chalk is considerably worse than normal chalk. I would like to hear your thoughts on this. Great video and thanks for the cool new information!
It's hard to comapre the two, I've used liquid chalk in the past and never really liked using it that much. My impression is that liquid chalk would make your hands feel drier at first, but Chalkless would make your hands feel drier over an entire climbing session or entire climbing route.
It would be interesting to se how this performs on a long lead route outdoors with rock that has been baking in the sun all day. If it can keep you dry then I would be majorly impressed and truly be called an innovation
Rhino skin products can already do this (antihydral). But they can have adverse affects on the skin, that varies with each climber. This stuff may have adverse affects on the rock, I'd really like to know the long term effects before people start using it all over the place.
@@chazott true, for me the dry stuff from rhino fucks my skin for weeks
@@Werder132 mine too
What if you mix? Apply the Chalkless, and then re-chalk (with the normal chalk) before every bolder? Does the Chalkless remain staying on your hands? Does the grip become better than just with Chalkless? Or, maybe, even than just with the normal high quality chalk?
And the second question is just about the same, but about combining the Chalkless with liquid chalk.
And the last question is kinda dumb, but you couldve guessed it: what if we combine all three? For example, some world class climbers do combine liquid chalk and normal one, and I do this as well from time to time, and it does have its benefits over just the normal chalk, imo. Mainly, its the longjevity (you've mentioned about this problem of a usual chalk in this video btw).
This is really neat! I definitely want to try it for working out. A couple of questions. 1. How would it work mixing the 2? Not to be a jerk, but i feel like you kinda did mix them with the amount of residual on the wall. (Not hating just observing)
2. How did it feel last run compared to first run of just the "chalkless"?
Thanks for the video!
My question is: will this leave a residue? I’m worried if so, it could damage outdoor climbing holds!
Great question. It didn't feel like it would leave a question, but let me ask some questions and do some testing myself!
@@Natemitka Thanks! Looking forward to learning more. I heard some liquid chalk brands have been using resin, which leaves residue that fills in the texture :'(
Should have done some hang board comparisons. See how long you can hang with one vs the other and test multiple times after rest to get an average
DO NOT USE THIS INDOORS. Silicosis is a big problem. Do not use this indoors. This goes for any chalks with silicon based drying agents.
At the climbing gym I manage and route set at, this very much not allowed to be used
Wow. Thank you for your comment. I’m going to reach out to the brand and some professionals to learn more
News flash any small particle can cause silicosis
Your car realeses a whole bottle of this stuff every time you start it up and then your AC spews thousands of HEPA particles all over you killing your indoor plants and giving your pets cancers
Sorry but if you are worried about things that can kill you don't look into the amount of pesticides in our water that cannot be boiled out and how we treat our water with bleach
Heck this video is even just really bad to promote this.
I think he should take this down before he make any investigation this is super misleading
Careful spouting nonsense. Amorphous silica gel is not harmful to lungs like crystalline silica dust.... it is just really expensive. There are lots of hydrophobic coatings, but chalk is the cheapest. This product is nonsense. I wish them well with marketing...
I hope you realize that silicosis is just one type of pneumoconiosis, you can develop pneumoconiosis from inhaling chalk dust as well, on a consistent basis. Limestone miners get this sometimes (sometimes called calcicosis, from calcium carbonate in limestone, or calcite) any mineral dust is bad for your lungs long term.
That seems promising ! Have you tried with both chalk AND chalkless at the same time ?
Yeah right!? I tried it two days ago with chalkless AND chalk and I found it worked just OK, it wasn't a magical breakthrough. I noticed chalk kept sliding off of my hands and I had to re-chalk more than I would expect with the double up.
If a small amount of super fine ground rosin was added to it would probably be better for climbing and you could add probably nearly none to it just to sort of mimic the tackyness of super dry hands from chalk.
I wonder how it would feel on Wood holds, I feel like those are a better measurement of more perfect rounded edges and way more reliant on skin friction
Totally hear you, I'll try to use this on some wooden holds. I feel like I dry-fire so much more often on a wooden board!
What residue does it leave behind? Many liquid chalks contains resins/gums that build up outside on the rock and can turn natural holds into glass. It can't be easily brushed away unlike traditional chalk and thus should not be used outside.
Its the grains of stuff thats in those "do not eat" packets only those are bigger grains.
Have you since tried chalk over chalkless? I would love to know if that makes the chalk last longer/reduces the change as you go through a route without re-chalking
looks like aerogel basically air trapped in a gel makes things waterproof and fire resistant
have you tried to do a session with chalkless at the beginning and then chalk on hard boulder to see if they can work together ?
What about using this as a base and then using a little chalk before each climb?
I've tried this the past few months and it works, but it's not as effective as just using Chalkless by itself, or using chalk by itself. Basically, the Chalkless stuff will wear down by the friction of the holds.
There used to be a chalk like that called Xfactor. It was fantastic.
Looks like Aerogel ground up. Veratasium covered his whole body in the stuff before going in the pool and was completely dry when exiting the pool.
how about combining both ? I have really sweaty palms and need to use excessive ammount of chalk, but if this chakless keeps hands drier, maybe it could lead to using very little amunt of chalk, for that extra dryness feeling
I am thinking what is the effect on the rock quality on outdoor climbing. I mean on some of the rock types it is not allowed (or ethically not allowed) to use chalk. E.g. on Andesite the chalk is closing the small channels inside the rock and that make it more greasy/slippery. It might happen with other rock type with the usage of this new "chalkless" product.
Real question is, does a base layer of this plus chalking up work even better?
Wait I thought the thumbnail was blurred 😭😭😭
Isn't it wild??
I wonder how this affects the holds. Will it cause holds to lose their grip over time because it builds up in the gaps? Or could it make the climbing shoes to have less grip?
Thanks for biting the bullet for us 😂. I think there's may be a mechanical aspect to regular climbing chalk. There's definitely a psychological component
This might be the end of liquid chalk. New base layer to apply once, and re-chalk when necessary (much less than usual).
The claim that it doesn't need to be reapplied is certainly false. Skin wears off during climbing, this stuff would go with it. But it may delay the application frequency and work well in certain applications. I'm curious but cautious about using it until I understand what the risks are to human health and the rock.
Did you try it with chalk? Using chalkless as a base and then only minimal chalk throughout the session.
Chalkless would go hard in DWS, no more soggy chalk bags!
The algorithm sent this to me because I climb. But I don’t use chalk. lol
It always makes my hands slick. My hands are very dry and rough. Unsure if that is relevant to why. I keep a towel with me to clean off chalk from hands and holds.
This reminds me a lot of "colloidal silicon dioxide" powder. You can buy it for indigestion, should probably be cheaper, and I'm curious how it compares to that chalkless stuff
I really wish you showed a control (no chalk of either kind) and also what would happen if you used both at the same time
At $25 a spice shaker, I'm cutting this with regular chalk. The ultimate test of this product would be a full hangboard session without rechalking.
Curious about effects, if any, of it building up on holds. If it absorbes oil what does saturaded buildup feel like?
Another thing is if everyone is using this would it affect the holds? Cuz it looks like a plasticky slightly gel like substance and inevitably some will be left on the holds, I think? So if everyone is rubbing this gel off on the holds then would it make the holds themselves more slippery? Like leftover chalk on holds, but with this you can’t brush it off easily
How does it behave when building up on a hold. If an entire gym of climbers used it on a hold would we be able to brush off any build up like with chalk? Would we even need to?
Is this safe to breath? Although it's safe in makeup and shampoo, the quantity is really low. Would pure silica silylate be safe to use? Feel like chalk is much safer.
I think this is like aerogel-sand typa stuff cause of how it looks and how light it is
can you try mixing both ??
Is it just silica??? Because usually water resistant products have a forever chemical called PSFA that can cause all sorts of things like cancer. In CA we are very slowly starting to try to ban this chemical but that’s my only concern