The Super Constellation and other piston engined aircraft all produce flames from the exhaust at takeoff due to the mixture being set at 'Full Rich', the flames is the unburnt fuel igniting at the exhaust.
I did that on sea trials for the USS Enterprise in 1982..... we did it at night so Soviet satellites couldn't see how fast we were going. When we heeled over like that the entire ship began to shake and things that weren't tied down especially stuff on shelves, began flying off.
@4:27 I know what happened. The copilot made a mistake with the left engine throtle reverse, which caused the engine turgine gear overheating and an emergency stop to void it to break. This is a very old FAIRCHILD C-123K used only in airshows.
That thunderstorm approach would have given my mother a heart attack. Even with air travel being the safest mode of transportation, she's still afraid of flying and has a death grip on the arm rests with every landing lol
Kind of insane how ship making has improved so radically…this turn radius and speed is absolutely nuts! It wasn’t so long ago a ship would need MILES of open water to make a maneuver like this..and this is an aircraft carrier !
Transport category performance data assumes the airplane crosses the threshold at 50 feet and lands on the 1000 foot markings. That is included in the runway distance calculations. There is never a reason to land short of that. If the runway isn't long enough, they should go to another airport.
@@bbgun061 yes. You are 100% correct. Also want to add, for some weird reason, people think that runway length is important for landing. But if the runway is just long enough, you could never takeoff from there. It’s the takeoff people should worry about, not the landing.
@vk4vsp that's her. Last I'd heard she was the only Super Constellation flying, with another in America almost finishing restored to flying condition. There's also an earlier model Constellation flying in America
3:20 - ну если быть точным, то более известный как "афганский заход", и применявшимся советскими летчиками Ограниченного контингента советских войск в Афганистане во время выполнения интернационального долга в республике Афганистан в 1979 - 1989 г.г. для посадки самолетами АН-12 , АН-26 и ИЛ-76 в Кабул, что немного ранее, чем события в Югославии.
6:51 - "But it didn't seem to be an issue, since the plane continued to the United States" - BS. Since an extended gear exorbitantly raises fuel consumption, this plane definitely did NOT continue to the US. But since Amsterdam and the east coast of the US are a long haul that plane was filled up with fuel and was most likely heavily overweight for a direct return. Normal procedure would then be to dump fuel over the northern sea and return for landing thereafter.
It probably had a long taxi time and left gear down to cool brakes for a few minutes. It’s no different than sitting on the ground and burning fuel waiting for the brakes to cool.
@@ChristianLamine you'd be surprised. The 787 has a tendency to roll forward at idle (from what I'm told by my father, who is a 787 captain with united), so the pilots almost always have to be on the brakes constantly at some amount. That heating adds up on longer taxis. Wouldn't want a wheel well fire would ya?
Ho, yeah, thank you RUclips to recommend me AGAIN this channel. Which I already commented on, that I would LOVE the content if not for the unsufferable voice SPOILING EVERY 30 SECONDS CLIPS EVERY 30 SECONDS! I'M SURE YOU RECOMMAND THIS TO ME BECAUSE THAT CHANGED, RIGHT? f. you Alphabet. You are definitely way to slow on AI tech. Probably the word "Intelligence" scared you.
I think it was originally called a Kaysan (spelling probably incorrect) approach after a besieged base in Vietnam and was designed to minimise exposure to small arms ground fire on approach.
Rib-tickling 🙄: it's called "Sarajevo approach" because it was used in Sarajevo by the aircrafts supplying UN forces in order to mitigate AAA or SAM threats in the vicinity of the airport, that's it.
Get your aviation apparel now during the Black Friday sale: theaviationcentral.com
The Super Constellation sounds amazing.
The last video looks like they're landing in heaven.
0:27 BANK ANGLE BANK ANGLE!
The sound the Super Constellation makes, just makes me smile.
The Super Constellation and other piston engined aircraft all produce flames from the exhaust at takeoff due to the mixture being set at 'Full Rich', the flames is the unburnt fuel igniting at the exhaust.
you mean Fuel rich.
@@randomsnow6510, Full Rich is what I was taught,............. pre Take Off checklist - Mixture, Full Rich.
Welcome to weekly dose of aviation.....starts with a ship drifting 😂😂😂😂
It's a drifting airport 😎
there was a plane on deck still!
@@kineticdeath now land on it while drifting
it is a carrier for plane use
Thanks Lucaas. The Connie was an amazing aircraft. From initial design through its changes and improvements.
Flames coming out of those motors that was something I've never seen. 👍👊💥
1:42 Aerosucre is desperately trying to get in contact with this pilot
Lmao
I did that on sea trials for the USS Enterprise in 1982..... we did it at night so Soviet satellites couldn't see how fast we were going. When we heeled over like that the entire ship began to shake and things that weren't tied down especially stuff on shelves, began flying off.
Because spy satellites don't have lidar and infrared...
No, you did it at night to rock you to sleep.
Not shown in the video: all the planes in the hangar deck piled against the wall.
Damn, that's 100,000 tons of aircraft carrier looking like she's ready to keel over at those speeds - incredible!
I've never even heard of a super constellation. that is a beautiful plane! Now i'm going to go binge some content on it.
the constellation is the most beautiful plane ever built. It was my favourite addon for FSX
that one guy ring to eat right when the ship turns hard: Oh! for fuck sake! everytime!
@4:27 I know what happened. The copilot made a mistake with the left engine throtle reverse, which caused the engine turgine gear overheating and an emergency stop to void it to break. This is a very old FAIRCHILD C-123K used only in airshows.
6:20 Four Burnin' and Three Tailin'
Lol 6 turnin 4 burnin but for Connie
Awesome!
Yeah it was pretty funny to see my friend through someone out the back of his direct drive ski boat,
Since when the whole yt comment section consists of bots?
Since ages ago
Idk a decade or two
Ik right?
I report them occasionally, when I'm feeling particularly grumpy
Thank you for the video..❤❤
That thunderstorm approach would have given my mother a heart attack. Even with air travel being the safest mode of transportation, she's still afraid of flying and has a death grip on the arm rests with every landing lol
Just bought stuff from your store! Keep the good job.
Kind of insane how ship making has improved so radically…this turn radius and speed is absolutely nuts! It wasn’t so long ago a ship would need MILES of open water to make a maneuver like this..and this is an aircraft carrier !
Aircraft carriers have always been able to do this. Nothing new.
Best way to dodge torpedoes and bombs.
5:51 The car sound on my phone sideways is more impressive than the landing
0:47 That's perfect! I always hate when pilots float around then land 50% in the runway
Nothing perfect about this. It shows that the pilot is insecure.
You obviously don’t know what a touchdown zone is
Transport category performance data assumes the airplane crosses the threshold at 50 feet and lands on the 1000 foot markings. That is included in the runway distance calculations. There is never a reason to land short of that. If the runway isn't long enough, they should go to another airport.
@@bbgun061 yes. You are 100% correct.
Also want to add, for some weird reason, people think that runway length is important for landing. But if the runway is just long enough, you could never takeoff from there. It’s the takeoff people should worry about, not the landing.
Polar Express finally got serious competition
777x “incredible maneuvers” = not losing a tire or a door plug while airborne
It's not everyday your landing infrastructure is more maneuverable than you...
That touchdown in Greece looked perfect to me.
Super Conni 06:20
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
That aircraft carrier makes surprisingly tight turns!
7:02 I am from Kolkata and I never got to know that the Beluga landed here
That's why we placed the touch down zone there and not on the numbers
how does oyutube dare gatekeep this from me for 60seconds
Do you spek the englend
@yazzy4175 do u
I love watching planes on oyutube
@@tyguy9312Aeroplane Good, Fire Bad
They dont... it is your cell service
I been watching since the GTA flight sim gameplays
That clip of Miss Connie is ancient.
She's also the last of her kind still in the air
There's two of them flying, one in Australia and one in the US. That's the Australian one, going by the Qantas logo on the tail.
@vk4vsp that's her. Last I'd heard she was the only Super Constellation flying, with another in America almost finishing restored to flying condition. There's also an earlier model Constellation flying in America
@ Ah. I didn’t realise the one flying in the US wasn’t a Super. We tend to just call them all Connies. 🙂
I thought there were two.
We need more winds!
Is Boeing still trying to impress people with its “maneuvers” while they’re still in the midst of a congressional inquiry?
Drifting carrier❌
Drifting new m5✅
1:52 all those ppl questioning what is happening
Bro is gonna end up like that air France💀💀💀
I always feel so sorry for Airbus pilots. Getting called names every time they land must be very demoralizing.
3:20 - ну если быть точным, то более известный как "афганский заход", и применявшимся советскими летчиками Ограниченного контингента советских войск в Афганистане во время выполнения интернационального долга в республике Афганистан в 1979 - 1989 г.г. для посадки самолетами АН-12 , АН-26 и ИЛ-76 в Кабул, что немного ранее, чем события в Югославии.
Interesting. I didn't know that but it makes sense. Thanks for the clarification
BMW : I the best drifting machine...
USS Abraham Lincoln: hold my missiles....
Awesome 👍
wowza
Can someone explain why the captain shifts the throttle to front and then quickly to the rear at 5:26 ?? TIA
Could the C-123 engine stopping be due to the pilots just using one engine for taxiing, I don’t know I’m probably wrong
luckily, no one was injured.
the true goat
Damn the connie is so pretty
Thanks for the great content, lucaas! I loved the drifting carrier and the lighting strike.
Eurobeat intensifies
battleship is real
6:51 - "But it didn't seem to be an issue, since the plane continued to the United States" - BS. Since an extended gear exorbitantly raises fuel consumption, this plane definitely did NOT continue to the US. But since Amsterdam and the east coast of the US are a long haul that plane was filled up with fuel and was most likely heavily overweight for a direct return. Normal procedure would then be to dump fuel over the northern sea and return for landing thereafter.
It probably had a long taxi time and left gear down to cool brakes for a few minutes. It’s no different than sitting on the ground and burning fuel waiting for the brakes to cool.
@@astrarailphoto Taxiing certainly does not heat up brakes to the point where gear cannot be retracted safely.
@@ChristianLamine you'd be surprised. The 787 has a tendency to roll forward at idle (from what I'm told by my father, who is a 787 captain with united), so the pilots almost always have to be on the brakes constantly at some amount. That heating adds up on longer taxis. Wouldn't want a wheel well fire would ya?
The 757 is the same way.
Wow
Been subscribed to you for a while, keep it up!
Bot
back to 3 mn videos
Hello
Your editing are on point, loved it!
Bot
@@thatawkardfeeling9076 usually they are 3 hours old.. this one is more clever and generic, without the lovey fakes
Yemen send it repairing center 😅
“It just a normal rock. You don’t have to drift”
The Carrier Captain:
Bro really out here thinking he’s in Tokyo Drift
Haven't seen one of these videos is such a long time. Just wanna say you're doing a great job keeping it up. Don't give up ❗️🔥
👍
Ho, yeah, thank you RUclips to recommend me AGAIN this channel.
Which I already commented on, that I would LOVE the content if not for the unsufferable voice SPOILING EVERY 30 SECONDS CLIPS EVERY 30 SECONDS!
I'M SURE YOU RECOMMAND THIS TO ME BECAUSE THAT CHANGED, RIGHT?
f. you Alphabet. You are definitely way to slow on AI tech. Probably the word "Intelligence" scared you.
what
Lol
It's called a Sarajevo approach? To commemorate the bombing of civilians?
I think it was originally called a Kaysan (spelling probably incorrect) approach after a besieged base in Vietnam and was designed to minimise exposure to small arms ground fire on approach.
It’s called a Combat landing. For some reason media turned it into a Sarajevo approach.
@j3xk72r9 did you mean Khe Sanh?
Rib-tickling 🙄: it's called "Sarajevo approach" because it was used in Sarajevo by the aircrafts supplying UN forces in order to mitigate AAA or SAM threats in the vicinity of the airport, that's it.
777x 🤣😂