PROMASTER or SPRINTER? Which is best? Which is right for you?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 ноя 2024
  • We take a dive into the differences between the Sprinter and Promaster platforms as they pertain to our popular Basecamper layout. Of course, we'll discuss the pros and cons of All Wheel Drive vs Front Wheel Drive, but also about dimensions, drivetrain complexity, and a lot more.
  • Авто/МотоАвто/Мото

Комментарии • 59

  • @cwheremonster8870
    @cwheremonster8870 8 месяцев назад +20

    I’ve had both. I started with Promaster. Bought a Sprinter and put a ton f money into a build. The ability to utilize 4WD/AWD was nice. But I missed the wide space and flat walls of the Promaster. I’m back in a Promaster, and never looking back. Oh, and I don’t miss the $1200 service fees for working ona Mercedes.

    • @ReadySetVan
      @ReadySetVan  8 месяцев назад +3

      Thanks for sharing. Nice to hear from someone who has done both! Glad to hear you're happy with what you've got.

    • @GOLDVIOLINbowofdeath
      @GOLDVIOLINbowofdeath 7 месяцев назад

      Those “flat” walls don’t allow parallel parking on many city streets since all roads are crowned for drainage thus tilting the top toward the curb and the signs are usually so close to the curb you will be scraping more with the Promaster. Same problem with tree limbs

    • @GOLDVIOLINbowofdeath
      @GOLDVIOLINbowofdeath 7 месяцев назад

      Just remember, some builders love the Promasters because they know there will be more money leftover to pay them for a build for people with lower budgets. Similar logic for why manufacturers/inventors go for Mercedes first because owners have more money to spend on accessories. To not talk about the build quality of a Promaster vs Sprinter seems negligent. Mercedes beats it hands down. It only takes a 10 second glance for me to see the difference

    • @cwheremonster8870
      @cwheremonster8870 7 месяцев назад +2

      Huh.. that’s not been my experience. Let me repeat… I love the Sprinter. But my warranty items were 3:1 in favor of the Promaster. I’ve got zero horses left in this fight. Buy the rig that is right for YOUR build.

    • @cwheremonster8870
      @cwheremonster8870 7 месяцев назад

      Ummm.. so those same crowns don’t apply to a Sprinter ?? Sorry, brotha .. I full timed in a sprinter for almost two years . Not sure what your point is (?).

  • @koertklaren6194
    @koertklaren6194 8 месяцев назад +5

    Great video, just in the design phase of my 170 sprinter. But this video really shows the actual size of the van. Thanks!

    • @ReadySetVan
      @ReadySetVan  8 месяцев назад +1

      Thanks! The 170 has a LOT of space to work with inside. Good luck with your build!

  • @richellealexander6636
    @richellealexander6636 8 месяцев назад +7

    So helpful. I'm looking into van life. 70 year old woman that wants to travel to visit family across the country.

    • @ReadySetVan
      @ReadySetVan  8 месяцев назад +1

      Glad to hear it! Traveling to visit family and friends is a super common use for many of our clients (and us too!).

    • @LisaC-l2e
      @LisaC-l2e Месяц назад

      This is something I am also thinking of, I am 72, live in Florida and family lives in California!

  • @patrickseals5746
    @patrickseals5746 8 месяцев назад +23

    Being a fleet manager that had all three the last choice would be the Mercedes. They cost a fortune to fix and at a 100,000 miles the dash lights come on all the time for more service that are usually $1500.00 or more. The pro master has one big fault and that is front wheel drive, it sucks in the snow because being a utility vehicle all the weight is in the back. The engine is the Pentastar v6 in everything dodge makes from jeep, Ram, Challenger, charger, etc. Its a 2-300,000 mile engine and give decent mileage and minimal maintenance. The Ford Transit is my choice. Rear wheel drive, good powertrain if you stay away from turbos. Also minimal maintenance and is also reliable. Thats my 2 cents from experience.

    • @cwheremonster8870
      @cwheremonster8870 7 месяцев назад +3

      I wish your comment was much higher… this has been my experience, as well.

    • @tomsweeney8433
      @tomsweeney8433 2 месяца назад

      Thank you

    • @thejasonrk
      @thejasonrk Месяц назад

      wouldnt trust a transit, that 10-speed automatic fails in less than 100k almost guaranteed

  • @lizahermandez57
    @lizahermandez57 Месяц назад +2

    Thank you for putting this video out. It’s very informative and helps us make a decision.

  • @djsarg7451
    @djsarg7451 7 месяцев назад +5

    Promaster: 9-speed trans (smooth), good gas mileage, enough power, small turn radius, Front Wheel Drive (drives the same full of empty), more room inside, dealers all across the USA, shocks to not hang low, more ground clearance, more options (less 4WD and diesel), lower repair cost. low upfront cost. I put KO2 A/T tires on, so snow, mud and off-road has been fine. Do not have to worry about turbo failure, fan parts in my engine. Promaster was an easy choice.

  • @martwne123
    @martwne123 7 месяцев назад +1

    From England, I respect your understanding of functionality, you understand you need to live vanlife to understand it, I'm forever perfecting my camper 👍

  • @hawkfloridastyle
    @hawkfloridastyle 8 месяцев назад +3

    Great information Ben. AWD is definitely needed in the Southeast with the dirt/mud after a rain.

    • @ReadySetVan
      @ReadySetVan  8 месяцев назад

      Thanks! Yep, sinking mud is a no-go for the Promaster.

  • @VanLand
    @VanLand 8 месяцев назад +3

    All-wheel drive is a must on a van if you plan to go in snow, sand or mud. I wouldn't take a Promaster off the pavement. In our market (California), no one wants 2WD vans. They don't sell because they are way too easy to get stuck. Cool interiors- nice work!

    • @christopherhaak9824
      @christopherhaak9824 4 месяца назад

      That's completely silly, there are promasters driving and exploring all over CA.

  • @TJDawgs72
    @TJDawgs72 8 месяцев назад +10

    Promaster really needs to offer an AWD option…regardless, I would still rather have a Ford Transit over both of these.

    • @EvoCarl
      @EvoCarl 8 месяцев назад

      Transit with the wet belt problems? No chance 😁

    • @walwalka
      @walwalka 8 месяцев назад +1

      ⁠@@EvoCarlNot in the US it doesn’t. Timing chains around.

    • @EvoCarl
      @EvoCarl 8 месяцев назад

      @@walwalka yeah don’t think the US gets the EcoPop 2L like the EU. Lucky, shockingly bad engine.

    • @walwalka
      @walwalka 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@EvoCarl Quite the difference it makes, I’ve got the 3.5L ecoboost and AWD in my van. It’s been fantastic.

    • @EvoCarl
      @EvoCarl 8 месяцев назад

      @@walwalka would love that over here 👍

  • @Hsia_Travels
    @Hsia_Travels 8 месяцев назад +9

    You want best of both worlds, cheaper to service and parts are available worldwide: FORD Transit 350HD Twin turbo, AWD. Great interior height, Wider, 300+ HP. Strange that most people don't build more from the Transit platform.

    • @ReadySetVan
      @ReadySetVan  8 месяцев назад +7

      The last couple of years it was nearly impossible to get a Transit. Fortunately that has improved so I expect we'll see more Transit builds.

  • @bassmonk2920
    @bassmonk2920 5 месяцев назад +5

    Pro Master is more of an East Coast van (Low bridges on the parkways) also no BLM land. Sprinter has way higher maintenance cost and harder to find repair shops.

  • @tommoore2572
    @tommoore2572 8 месяцев назад +2

    Great comparison. When, or if, I actually go with a Class B, I am pretty sure it will be Promaster.

    • @ReadySetVan
      @ReadySetVan  8 месяцев назад

      Thanks! We tend to agree and think the Promaster is the best choice for most people.

  • @jeffsteinmetz7188
    @jeffsteinmetz7188 8 месяцев назад +10

    Neither, I got a Ford Transit AWD with a more horsepower and more torque than both the Sprinter and Promaster.

    • @van_mod1
      @van_mod1 8 месяцев назад +1

      Just be careful of those super low shock mounts on the Transit. For me, nothing beats the ProMaster for usable interior space given the exterior size.

    • @mattv5774
      @mattv5774 7 месяцев назад +1

      Ford transit sucks I work on them every day I hate every bit of them especially changing the brakes is just horrible design

    • @jeffsteinmetz7188
      @jeffsteinmetz7188 7 месяцев назад +2

      @@van_mod1 Upgraded suspension to Van Compass 2.0 kit for AWD. Lower shock mounts not an issue anymore.

  • @taracarrow9977
    @taracarrow9977 8 месяцев назад +3

    I would prefer the Ford all wheel drive.

  • @MikeGabler
    @MikeGabler 2 месяца назад

    thank you for your comparison. However you compared an optional all wheel drive short wheel base to a long wheel base 2wd Ram Promaster. You can get a Sprinter as a 170 wheel base extended length which would give you 16 foot of floor space behind the front seats.

    • @ReadySetVan
      @ReadySetVan  2 месяца назад +1

      Thanks for watching! The 170 is in a different class - these are both the

    • @MikeGabler
      @MikeGabler 2 месяца назад

      @@ReadySetVan thank you for clarifying that. So it sounds more like you are comparing more of what you build rather than actual attributes of each van in an apple to apple comparison.

  • @emilywhalen5731
    @emilywhalen5731 5 месяцев назад

    One question I always had about these builds is the water situation. Is it hookup only or is there a tank? I don't see where the tank would be or how much it would even hold.

  • @tomsweeney8433
    @tomsweeney8433 2 месяца назад

    Is as one making a hybrid van yet?

  • @marcosilva5243
    @marcosilva5243 8 месяцев назад +1

    Of course you can’t go on the mod because is only front wheel drive 😂

  • @harpo2739
    @harpo2739 8 месяцев назад +1

    Sprinter and Mercedes both have some of the poorest reliability issues both power and driveline.

  • @JT8D200C
    @JT8D200C 7 месяцев назад +1

    Transit

  • @brettbutler9730
    @brettbutler9730 7 месяцев назад

    They Both Look good. and fancy. too fancy. beds too low for my bike. I want to put my mtb in with wheels on..

  • @wkw4095
    @wkw4095 8 месяцев назад

    I'm surprised people don't desire a private vented enclosed head.

    • @ReadySetVan
      @ReadySetVan  8 месяцев назад

      We also do builds with a private head/shower, and they are quite popular. This build has a vented toilet located in one the the bench seats.

  • @robertoaguila9874
    @robertoaguila9874 3 месяца назад

    Hey Sir , I need watching you a lot and you seems really nice for a very successful rich guy . Just wondering , do you guys by any chance have an older model of that I can buy since I can't afford a new one . I'm a senior citizens retired fixed income , perfect time for me to own one since I'm retired . I'm worried to just look for one to buy a used one and end up getting one with so many problems . With you I'm pretty sure you will not sell a van with so many issues . I just want to try to enjoy life a little bit . I will trade my car for that and get a loan for the rest . This probably sounds a weird comment but I want to give it a try , you never know ... Anyway , hoping to hear from you ! Sincerely , Old man dreaming!

  • @blockhead3654
    @blockhead3654 8 месяцев назад

    Its the sprinter. The other is a death trap. That mini me window. You cant even fit your arm out of. And it looks stupid.

  • @SeanAden-h1q
    @SeanAden-h1q 8 месяцев назад +5

    Promaster is better . Gasoline motor. Diesels suck and pricey

  • @JimJones-gd2jy
    @JimJones-gd2jy 8 месяцев назад +1

    Gutless throw away vans . . .

  • @jeffmiller3150
    @jeffmiller3150 8 месяцев назад

    One is garbage and one is the absolutely the worst garbage ever!🤔

  • @Scrambler85
    @Scrambler85 8 месяцев назад

    If you are 6,4" or taller, the Ford Transit is the best van.
    The Promaster is very wimpy in the mountains