Some of you mentioned Google Scholar which is another great option and is really easy to use. I would suggest trying it but it hasn't made a huge difference for me. Glad I didn't cover it because apparently I say Google weird and I would've just said it more lol. Happy study partying! 🤓
Just depends on how much money the scientist get paid for for the study. If a pro vegan group pays a world known scientist to do a negative study of meat and dairy he or she will do it.
Google Scholar is particularly useful when you want to see which studies have cited a paper, to follow those citations in date order, and to search within just those citing articles - none of which is really practicable in Google.
I think a lot of self educated and beginner science students could enjoy this video. I'd love to see you turn this into a series. How understand science research and scientific terms.
Yes! I've been waiting for this a long time and I'm happy Mic finally uploaded a video on this topic. As an academic from a different field I will soak up a series like a sponge! 😂
Maybe this is a bit off topic, but one important thing when reading a scientific paper is to keep in mind that to establish something in science, plurality of evidence and consistency in the evidence are necessary. You can always find an article that shows what you may initially believe, but it may not represent the conclusion of the whole body of research on the subject taken together. So do not make up your mind about an issue after reading a single paper. Reading reviews and meta-analyses may help, but even those may be biased, so reading several of them on a given subject is useful.
Thanks Mic. :) Could you also do part two where you explain all the jargons and types of studies like meta-analysis, epidemiology, RCTs, double-blind, mendelian randomization, cohort, longitudinal, cross-sectional, etc. and how to rate/judge the quality of a study in layman terms with some examples, if you haven't already ?
Very good points, Mukul. Let me help with a few of these terms meanwhile: [1] epidemiology studies patterns of health and disease across populations (large numbers of people); . . . [2] random trials/samples are much more reliable than non-random studies; . . . [3] cross-sectional or synchronic studies look across a group of population at a point in time whilst . . . [4] longitudinal or diachronic studies look at the same group/population of interest across years/decades; . . . [5] cohort means a group of persons with same or similar characteristics e.g., an age-cohort whereby all persons in that cohort are within 5 or 10 years of each other in terms of age.
This was great! Could you do a video on the different types of studies and how they differ, what makes some higher quality / more meaningful than others?
@@MictheVegan I guess if you are mainly interested in medical topics, then pub med might be sufficient. However, if you want to look at broader topics (eg. environmental impacts, education studies, etc.) then a more general search tool like google scholar could come in handy.
Claire, I wish you every success in that field. Too many persons in the medical fields in Western countries remain under-informed in prevention such as nutrition and health-promoting lifestyles versus a heavy emphasis on managing diseases, waiting until people are sick, and then talking entirely/mostly about drugs, surgeries, and death.
@@brentshuffler1234 thank you so much and yeah I know. Even my friend who is a nurse feels there are some nutrients you can only get from eating meat. Maybe if I save some studies and get my degree she might actually believe me when I tell her that's false
Thanks! Yes, would love another video covering more sources, more statistical analysis and more things to watch out for - maybe based on studies you had a hard time finding - or statistical issues with studies that gave you a hard time? This is really powerful education.
Mic, thanks very much. This is an excellent video because it is so hands-on and walks us through a practical process that empowers each of us forever afterwards. Many previous videos are heavy on medical terms and scientific jargon but this time you made it very clear and simple to follow. I was personally gratified and edified by the study that you highlighted showing a wonderful outcome highly in favour of health-conscious vegans versus even health-conscious meat-eaters. E.g., in my own experience, I am the only vegan in my workplace and I am the only one with zero missed workdays for 5 consecutive years . . . and I am the third oldest as well . . .
Going Meta is such an important method. Most people who read a meta-analysis are not doing meta-science: Knowing how science itself works and how to read and interpret studies.
This is brilliant, great work as always. If only more people read the actual studies and not just the articles about studies, or even sometimes just the headlines of articles it seems...
thx so much...pls go through other studies for us too...maybe one a month??...jyst so we get better at this...thank you...im in Australia and are forever seeing crappy diets promoted by "research" in our newspapers...this will help me to tackle that problem & m aybe even write in to the paper ❤
Yooooo..... I’m a few months from becoming a Dietitian, this is a fucking 💎. I was a research assistant in undergrad and this was way more in depth than any training I have gotten, in 20 fucking minutes.
In my medical science study we had a course devoted solely to searching on pubmed and other platforms. Besides what Mic already said, another important thing is knowing boolean search, and to include as many key words, synonyms and related words as possible. That means doing a pre-search on all those words before doing the actual search. In literature studies you write this down as part of your method section.
I was frustrated with this for a long time and just today I was looking into it again. When I saw this video I thought is was a old recommandation first because of that.
YEESSSss I need this! There's this one study I saw about 60% to 68% greater bone fractures with consumption of dairy, maybe I'll be able to find it now :)
Yes, miagrace, that is definitely ringing a bell in my memory also. I recall reading studies showing that meat-eaters and dairy-consumers have a number of diseases including higher risks of osteoporosis (including the effects of acidity from meats; the depletion of calcium when persons consume too much added salt), heart-attacks, strokes, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension. I suspect that most people in Western cultures are consuming dairy products from large-scale farms and manufacturers rather than organic, traditional, small family-owned farms. The added sugars, the added preservatives, the added other ingredients can easily outweigh the benefits of dairy products such as the probiotics (which are easily lost when dairy products are pasteurised = subjected to high heat).
Thank you for making this video, it's a great starting point for people looking to educate themselves, and I will very much likely reference/suggest this video in the future. Keep up the great work! :)
in addition to scientific studies, many statistics textbooks discuss (double-blinded) randomized, controlled trials, as well as observational studies and correlational studies. (controls can be with a placebo or the current standard treatment.) statistics textbooks also discuss biases of various sorts when collecting and analyzing data. good published studies say how they avoid or minimize biases in the collection and analysis of data, in particular when test subjects drop out of the analysis or do not report results.
You know what would be super cool ? A way to map the numerous institutions and actors of the studies world, such as we can easily see if studies are made by people of the industry, and also some list of "independant scientists".
Bro thank you so much because it’s hard sometimes and I was just thinking about how I wished there was a video and now there is by an amazingly smart person!
You are a living example what a vegan PR should look like. Science, science and science first! Great mate! I love how you do it! When I was considering vegan diet I was always pushed away from it by fanatics who, when I said that I am trying to switch from vegetarianism to veganism, attacked me that I am a hypocrite who eats chicken’s periods and bee’s vomit. Frankly, because of those people I almost went carnivore just to spite them. They thought that I was worse than butchers for having honey in my morning tea. I decided to do my journey without those fanatics and do it on my own following science based people and MDs like Garth Davis. Your channel also. I am on good way to eliminate eggs but honey is really my weak spot 🙂
Is there no end to how helpful you can be? Thank you for giving us the credit for being able to learn how to read scientific papers. Vegans are incredibly intelligent. That’s why we’re vegan.
Totally agree with you, Wisconsin Wanderer. In simple English, if you eat garbage, you will feel like crap. If you feast on junk, disease will prey on you. Harmful microbes just love all the added sugars and processed carbohydrates that people are consume . . . leading to higher instances of tooth-decay, heart-attacks, obesity, strokes, hypertension, diabetes, etc.
The problem with science study's is also that many study's give other conclussions from each other. For example one study says that meat is causing heart dissease. The other study says that meat is lowering the chance of heart dissease. Both study's you can find in official reports. To understand those offical journal/resports you have to be a scientist yourself. But it is always better to believe those study's instead of random articles you see on the internet.
Hey Mike, if possible Id really like to hear your take on Day Two's diet methodology where they build a diet plan according to a person's sequenced microbiome. I think it's by Eran Segal from the Weitzmann Institute. A friend with high cholesterol was given a diet high in fat and to limit any form of carbs. Not plant based. Thanks!
Thank you for this walkthrough, it was very helpful! Question: Did you see Gojiman's video about Micheal Gregor's SIBO videos? According to Gojiman, Gregor manipulated that studies A LOT. I've heard it said that Gregor "cherry picks" studies, but it was strange to see another vegan nutritionist calling him out on, not even cherry picking, but down right lying about the analysis in the original studies. It's bothering me a lot, since Micheal Gregor is what brought me to Veganism in the first place. I've always believed he was speaking from science, not bias.
What the study that Mic mentioned was showing is that, on average, the meat-eaters drank LESS water per day than did the vegans. That is a double problem because persons consuming more animal-based foods tend to get (as the study also showed) much higher intake of sodium, which then requires even more water-intake, but persons with high sodium-intake, on average, were getting significantly LESS water than the vegans.
I easily understand how vegans get more water because all of the truly wholesome whole foods are rich in water: e.g., fresh fruits, fresh vegetables, raw nuts, raw seeds, ground foods, and even dried foods (e.g., whole grains, peas and beans) that vegans then soak in plenty of water and then cook with plenty of added water.
From what I read of this study, the vegans did not have high blood-cholesterol levels. What was higher was the GOOD kind of cholesterol (the high density lipoproteins). Plus, the body-far percentages were much lower in the vegans than in the non-vegans.
Ever since I switched over to a whole food plant based vegan lifestyle three years ago ago, I wake up with stiffness every morning, like I used to during my teenage years 😂.
@@allee3476 you're probably not talking about arthritis 😂🤣 Did you see the experiment they did on Game Changers? I thought for sure that would convince my male friends to go vegan 😂
That is very clever. I immediately thought he said "morning sickness" and thought that the inference was that vegans were much healthier in every way, so that, not surprisingly, they would be more sexually active, more fertile, and more likely to have natural and healthy pregnancies. Either way, (pregnancy or erections) it is clear that the cleaner our diet, the cleaner our blood-vessels will be, and the better every organ will function. More fun . . . for a much longer life . . . and for a much bigger period of that longer life!
The problem with science study's is that they often give false information, because they forget some important factors. For example that meat is causing hart disseases they forget to put the numbers about the origin of the meat. If the animals had a much better life and much better food. the meat itself is also from different quality. If the majority of people just eat cheap meat from the supermarket nearby instead of a expensive butcher it will give another result in the study. It also depends on the location. If the location where people eat more meat than average do have much more emmisions in the air. It will effect health too. There are so many factors and it is difficult to avoid forgetting some important factors.
I don't think I would use this information personally, but I thought it was very interesting to know where and how you get scientific studies, so thank you. And yes, I would be interested in more videos like this.
PubMed focuses mainly on medicine and biomedical sciences, whereas Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar cover most scientific fields. 0:19 [Wiley]
While Google searches the entire Web, Google Scholar limits its searches to only academic journal articles produced by commercial publishers or scholarly societies. Google Scholar eliminates material from corporations, non-scholarly organizations, and from individuals. [Salesforce]
Google Scholar is a popular and free online tool that allows you to search for scholarly literature across various disciplines and sources. It can be a useful resource for academic research, but it also has some limitations and drawbacks that you should be aware of. [LinkedIn]
Web of Science is interdisciplinary and covers all scientific areas, but it only covers what it considers to "best" journals and concentrates on English language ones. 4:26
This should be how they learned us to search for studies on our first year of university (now i have graduated but still it was a pain to learn all that almost alone)
These vegans were high fat vegans. Their ave fat was 54g and there avg Cal were 2399. Which gives them a 20% fat diet. Way above Esselstyn 10%. Also when you look at what they ate, the averages showed that the vegans ate dairy and meat although much much less than the non-vegans. Although even the Esselstyn ppl ate non-fat yogurt.
Another comment from someone who clearly didn't watch the video. 🤦♂️ Everything he said about research strategies was the same as what I learned when I took a course in college on how to write a research paper.
![Megan Thee Stallion - Bigger In Texas [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QxTkZTLWdo4/mqdefault.jpg)
Some of you mentioned Google Scholar which is another great option and is really easy to use. I would suggest trying it but it hasn't made a huge difference for me. Glad I didn't cover it because apparently I say Google weird and I would've just said it more lol. Happy study partying! 🤓
Just depends on how much money the scientist get paid for for the study. If a pro vegan group pays a world known scientist to do a negative study of meat and dairy he or she will do it.
Google Scholar is particularly useful when you want to see which studies have cited a paper, to follow those citations in date order, and to search within just those citing articles - none of which is really practicable in Google.
Hey Mike, very good video as always! Check out my documentary on youtube 👉 The Connections (2021) [short documentary]
Keep it up!
you dont say google weird tf who said that
Ha ha, I heard you saying "Gyoogle" and thought it sounded weird. Then I read this... lol ;)
I think a lot of self educated and beginner science students could enjoy this video. I'd love to see you turn this into a series. How understand science research and scientific terms.
Yes! I've been waiting for this a long time and I'm happy Mic finally uploaded a video on this topic. As an academic from a different field I will soak up a series like a sponge! 😂
Bart Kay debunks.
Please, make it a series!!!
A video on hidden conflicts of interest would be really good. They can be very sneaky.
I second this!
Absolutely
Maybe this is a bit off topic, but one important thing when reading a scientific paper is to keep in mind that to establish something in science, plurality of evidence and consistency in the evidence are necessary.
You can always find an article that shows what you may initially believe, but it may not represent the conclusion of the whole body of research on the subject taken together. So do not make up your mind about an issue after reading a single paper.
Reading reviews and meta-analyses may help, but even those may be biased, so reading several of them on a given subject is useful.
Thanks Mic. :) Could you also do part two where you explain all the jargons and types of studies like meta-analysis, epidemiology, RCTs, double-blind, mendelian randomization, cohort, longitudinal, cross-sectional, etc. and how to rate/judge the quality of a study in layman terms with some examples, if you haven't already ?
That sounds like a great video idea! I'd like to see that too. Not everyone has taken a statistics course
Very good points, Mukul. Let me help with a few of these terms meanwhile:
[1] epidemiology studies patterns of health and disease across populations (large numbers of people); . . .
[2] random trials/samples are much more reliable than non-random studies; . . .
[3] cross-sectional or synchronic studies look across a group of population at a point in time whilst . . .
[4] longitudinal or diachronic studies look at the same group/population of interest across years/decades; . . .
[5] cohort means a group of persons with same or similar characteristics e.g., an age-cohort whereby all persons in that cohort are within 5 or 10 years of each other in terms of age.
@@brentshuffler1234 ¬ Thank you for that information! :)
@@brentshuffler1234 Thanks for explaining them. :)
The book Proteinaholic by Dr. Garth Davis has great information about types of studies, but I would love a video from Mic on that as well.
I vote for a “Finding conflicts of interests” video 🙌
I have interest in those conflicts as well
Bart Kay.
@@bwoodward9564 That name alone sends a shiver down my spine
This was great! Could you do a video on the different types of studies and how they differ, what makes some higher quality / more meaningful than others?
Bart Kay.
Just putting the word "study" in that google search is so simple., yet so effective.
Bart Kay.
Thanks Mic!!! So comprehensive and insightful. Really appreciate you doing this vid💚💚💚
Bart Kay debunks.
6:40 A study by my fellow Slovenian vegan researchers! NICE!
I'm surprised you didn't talk about Google Scholar, which will steer you towards the peer-reviewed literature.
Same
Yeah it just isn't part of my work flow but great suggestion. There is so much I didn't cover in the video.
@@MictheVegan I guess if you are mainly interested in medical topics, then pub med might be sufficient. However, if you want to look at broader topics (eg. environmental impacts, education studies, etc.) then a more general search tool like google scholar could come in handy.
@@MictheVegan could you kindly put the video transcripts as nutrictionfacts because there are no subtitles
Bart Kay debunks.
I would definitely like more on this topic, especially the how to spot bad studies slant.
Bart Kay.
I'm going to be starting school next month for nutrition so this is very helpful.
Claire, I wish you every success in that field. Too many persons in the medical fields in Western countries remain under-informed in prevention such as nutrition and health-promoting lifestyles versus a heavy emphasis on managing diseases, waiting until people are sick, and then talking entirely/mostly about drugs, surgeries, and death.
@@brentshuffler1234 thank you so much and yeah I know. Even my friend who is a nurse feels there are some nutrients you can only get from eating meat. Maybe if I save some studies and get my degree she might actually believe me when I tell her that's false
That’s great! What field?
Bart Kay
OMG! The video I've been waiting for!!
Excellent! Very helpful video, thank you. Knowing your way around the research is really important.
Bart Kay debunks.
Thanks! Yes, would love another video covering more sources, more statistical analysis and more things to watch out for - maybe based on studies you had a hard time finding - or statistical issues with studies that gave you a hard time? This is really powerful education.
Bart Kay.
Yes, please do more about Hidde Conflict Of Interest! Thanks so much for this and for all you do!
Bart Kay
Mic, thanks very much. This is an excellent video because it is so hands-on and walks us through a practical process that empowers each of us forever afterwards. Many previous videos are heavy on medical terms and scientific jargon but this time you made it very clear and simple to follow. I was personally gratified and edified by the study that you highlighted showing a wonderful outcome highly in favour of health-conscious vegans versus even health-conscious meat-eaters. E.g., in my own experience, I am the only vegan in my workplace and I am the only one with zero missed workdays for 5 consecutive years . . . and I am the third oldest as well . . .
Bart Kay
Great video idea. I learned about the raven & key from Dr. Greger and it has been a blessing to be able to have access to the full studies.
Everyone needs this info
Going Meta is such an important method. Most people who read a meta-analysis are not doing meta-science: Knowing how science itself works and how to read and interpret studies.
Bart Kay.
This is brilliant, great work as always. If only more people read the actual studies and not just the articles about studies, or even sometimes just the headlines of articles it seems...
Bart Kay debunks.
thx so much...pls go through other studies for us too...maybe one a month??...jyst so we get better at this...thank you...im in Australia and are forever seeing crappy diets promoted by "research" in our newspapers...this will help me to tackle that problem & m aybe even write in to the paper ❤
Bart Kay
Great info Mic. Thanks
This is what I was looking for! I didn't know where I could find studies but after this video thank you so much 😃
Bart Kay.
Also if you put ncbi at the end of your request it will bring up all the pubmed studies
Liked, already subbed with notifications on and watched all ads. Now watching all ads to support!
Yooooo..... I’m a few months from becoming a Dietitian, this is a fucking 💎. I was a research assistant in undergrad and this was way more in depth than any training I have gotten, in 20 fucking minutes.
Bart Kay
In my medical science study we had a course devoted solely to searching on pubmed and other platforms. Besides what Mic already said, another important thing is knowing boolean search, and to include as many key words, synonyms and related words as possible. That means doing a pre-search on all those words before doing the actual search. In literature studies you write this down as part of your method section.
Bart Kay debunks Mic.
I was frustrated with this for a long time and just today I was looking into it again. When I saw this video I thought is was a old recommandation first because of that.
Bart Kay
Yess this is super useful, thanks a lot!
Thank you for this. This is necessary
Thank you, Mic!
Thanks for sharing! I loved the video, super informative :)
Hahaha, love the way you say ‘Gewgull’ instead of ‘Google’
Wow I feel a little smarter now. Thanks Mic!
thanks Mic, very helpful! Say, if Vlad IMs you again on your video camera, tell him thanks for the tip!
Definitely like this format. Keep them coming! 👍
Thanks for the video, Mike!
That's amazing, thank you for the content!
I got my mom to go vegan because of your videos. It's also worth mentioning that google censors information, duckduckgo doesn't.
Thanks for the recommendation!
Bart Kay
Super good Video, thanks a lot Mic!!
YEESSSss I need this! There's this one study I saw about 60% to 68% greater bone fractures with consumption of dairy, maybe I'll be able to find it now :)
so, did you manage to find the study?
@@v.a.n.e. I haven't finished the video yet, I will in an hour or so I will then I'll start looking for it :)
Yes, miagrace, that is definitely ringing a bell in my memory also. I recall reading studies showing that meat-eaters and dairy-consumers have a number of diseases including higher risks of osteoporosis (including the effects of acidity from meats; the depletion of calcium when persons consume too much added salt), heart-attacks, strokes, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension. I suspect that most people in Western cultures are consuming dairy products from large-scale farms and manufacturers rather than organic, traditional, small family-owned farms. The added sugars, the added preservatives, the added other ingredients can easily outweigh the benefits of dairy products such as the probiotics (which are easily lost when dairy products are pasteurised = subjected to high heat).
Bart Kay debunks.
THANK YOU! I'M NOT YELLING YOU'RE YELLING!
I'm an old subscriber and recently asked you to make a video about this. Little did i know, it already existed. thank god!
Thank you for making this video, it's a great starting point for people looking to educate themselves, and I will very much likely reference/suggest this video in the future. Keep up the great work! :)
Yay Slovenia! 🙌Kudos for another great video - even more so, because you chose a study from our little country as an example. 😊
in addition to scientific studies, many statistics textbooks discuss (double-blinded) randomized, controlled trials, as well as observational studies and correlational studies. (controls can be with a placebo or the current standard treatment.) statistics textbooks also discuss biases of various sorts when collecting and analyzing data. good published studies say how they avoid or minimize biases in the collection and analysis of data, in particular when test subjects drop out of the analysis or do not report results.
You know what would be super cool ? A way to map the numerous institutions and actors of the studies world, such as we can easily see if studies are made by people of the industry, and also some list of "independant scientists".
This is fantastic, Mic! Love this!
I prefer Google scholar to find studys
Thanks , I haven't heard anything about the lymphatic system yet but now I can try and do my own research. Very supportive.
Great idea!
"cuticle cubical" lol
Thanks a lot. I usually put "nih" before search term, such as "nih insulin resistance". God bless!
Pure GOLD 👌🏻 Thanks mate
Bro thank you so much because it’s hard sometimes and I was just thinking about how I wished there was a video and now there is by an amazingly smart person!
Thanks fo rfinally putting up this video @mic. Very helpful
Super interesting topic! Thanks for making a video about this!
You are a living example what a vegan PR should look like. Science, science and science first! Great mate!
I love how you do it! When I was considering vegan diet I was always pushed away from it by fanatics who, when I said that I am trying to switch from vegetarianism to veganism, attacked me that I am a hypocrite who eats chicken’s periods and bee’s vomit. Frankly, because of those people I almost went carnivore just to spite them. They thought that I was worse than butchers for having honey in my morning tea. I decided to do my journey without those fanatics and do it on my own following science based people and MDs like Garth Davis. Your channel also. I am on good way to eliminate eggs but honey is really my weak spot 🙂
Thanks for the peek inside the system!
Definitely should turn this into a series!
Great information, thank you! 😍
please enable automatic english subtitles
Yes do another like this. :)
Gonna save this vid for when I go to uni.
Thanks for the info
Awesome!
VERY HELPFUL. Thank you!
very helpful video! especially for a first year biomed student :)
Yessssss tell the people how to do this! Loving your content
Useful! Thanks
Thank you. 👍
Very interesting and educational Mic! I liked it!
I would love to see you do a video on hunting for conflicts of interest.
Can you please put the Automatic English Subtitles?
It's important for non-native English speakers to understand the video.
Is there no end to how helpful you can be? Thank you for giving us the credit for being able to learn how to read scientific papers. Vegans are incredibly intelligent. That’s why we’re vegan.
I loved the sci-hub bit hahaha. Freedom of information!
Will these studies show how consuming fast foods contribute massively to our chronic mental health issues in our country. Suicide is off the charts!!
Totally agree with you, Wisconsin Wanderer. In simple English, if you eat garbage, you will feel like crap. If you feast on junk, disease will prey on you. Harmful microbes just love all the added sugars and processed carbohydrates that people are consume . . . leading to higher instances of tooth-decay, heart-attacks, obesity, strokes, hypertension, diabetes, etc.
literally what I was looking for!!!
The problem with science study's is also that many study's give other conclussions from each other. For example one study says that meat is causing heart dissease. The other study says that meat is lowering the chance of heart dissease. Both study's you can find in official reports. To understand those offical journal/resports you have to be a scientist yourself. But it is always better to believe those study's instead of random articles you see on the internet.
basically no consensus
Hey Mike,
if possible Id really like to hear your take on Day Two's diet methodology where they build a diet plan according to a person's sequenced microbiome. I think it's by Eran Segal from the Weitzmann Institute.
A friend with high cholesterol was given a diet high in fat and to limit any form of carbs. Not plant based.
Thanks!
i looked for this video as a desperate stem student and it was such a nice surprise to find this is about veganism
yeah but do you even know how to read FOREST PLOTS? :)
Thank you for this walkthrough, it was very helpful!
Question: Did you see Gojiman's video about Micheal Gregor's SIBO videos? According to Gojiman, Gregor manipulated that studies A LOT. I've heard it said that Gregor "cherry picks" studies, but it was strange to see another vegan nutritionist calling him out on, not even cherry picking, but down right lying about the analysis in the original studies. It's bothering me a lot, since Micheal Gregor is what brought me to Veganism in the first place. I've always believed he was speaking from science, not bias.
I have a video on this topic on my list :)
@@MictheVegan That would be amazing. Thank you so much.
Bart Kay debunks
The music is back!
You're a meat eater? Where do you get your water from?
What the study that Mic mentioned was showing is that, on average, the meat-eaters drank LESS water per day than did the vegans. That is a double problem because persons consuming more animal-based foods tend to get (as the study also showed) much higher intake of sodium, which then requires even more water-intake, but persons with high sodium-intake, on average, were getting significantly LESS water than the vegans.
I easily understand how vegans get more water because all of the truly wholesome whole foods are rich in water: e.g., fresh fruits, fresh vegetables, raw nuts, raw seeds, ground foods, and even dried foods (e.g., whole grains, peas and beans) that vegans then soak in plenty of water and then cook with plenty of added water.
Bart Kay debunks.
For the record, the way you said google was entirely normal. But maybe I say it “gewgul” as well and can’t hear the difference 😂
u said we don't wanna read Healthline but actually in their articles u can find some scientific references that link directly to studies.
Wait? Not memes on Facebook??
Love it! Thank you
Another potential reason for high cholesterol in those few vegans could be familial hypercholesteremia.
From what I read of this study, the vegans did not have high blood-cholesterol levels. What was higher was the GOOD kind of cholesterol (the high density lipoproteins). Plus, the body-far percentages were much lower in the vegans than in the non-vegans.
Mic said morning stiffness again... Lol. Mic said morning stiffness is becoming a problem... *Laughs so much has to pause the video* 🤣
Ever since I switched over to a whole food plant based vegan lifestyle three years ago ago, I wake up with stiffness every morning, like I used to during my teenage years 😂.
@@allee3476 you're probably not talking about arthritis 😂🤣 Did you see the experiment they did on Game Changers? I thought for sure that would convince my male friends to go vegan 😂
That is very clever. I immediately thought he said "morning sickness" and thought that the inference was that vegans were much healthier in every way, so that, not surprisingly, they would be more sexually active, more fertile, and more likely to have natural and healthy pregnancies. Either way, (pregnancy or erections) it is clear that the cleaner our diet, the cleaner our blood-vessels will be, and the better every organ will function. More fun . . . for a much longer life . . . and for a much bigger period of that longer life!
@@veganryori I saw it, indeed! That’s when I would jokingly remind my ladies friends that I was a vegan, and we’d all have a laugh about it 😂
Bart Kay debunks.
The problem with science study's is that they often give false information, because they forget some important factors. For example that meat is causing hart disseases they forget to put the numbers about the origin of the meat. If the animals had a much better life and much better food. the meat itself is also from different quality. If the majority of people just eat cheap meat from the supermarket nearby instead of a expensive butcher it will give another result in the study. It also depends on the location. If the location where people eat more meat than average do have much more emmisions in the air. It will effect health too. There are so many factors and it is difficult to avoid forgetting some important factors.
I don't think I would use this information personally, but I thought it was very interesting to know where and how you get scientific studies, so thank you.
And yes, I would be interested in more videos like this.
PubMed focuses mainly on medicine and biomedical sciences, whereas Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar cover most scientific fields. 0:19 [Wiley]
While Google searches the entire Web, Google Scholar limits its searches to only academic journal articles produced by commercial publishers or scholarly societies. Google Scholar eliminates material from corporations, non-scholarly organizations, and from individuals. [Salesforce]
Google Scholar helps you find relevant work across the world of scholarly research. 1:50
Google Scholar is a popular and free online tool that allows you to search for scholarly literature across various disciplines and sources. It can be a useful resource for academic research, but it also has some limitations and drawbacks that you should be aware of. [LinkedIn]
Web of Science is interdisciplinary and covers all scientific areas, but it only covers what it considers to "best" journals and concentrates on English language ones. 4:26
This should be how they learned us to search for studies on our first year of university (now i have graduated but still it was a pain to learn all that almost alone)
What's wrong with healthline?
That Sci-Hub part was hilarious 😂
These vegans were high fat vegans. Their ave fat was 54g and there avg Cal were 2399. Which gives them a 20% fat diet. Way above Esselstyn 10%. Also when you look at what they ate, the averages showed that the vegans ate dairy and meat although much much less than the non-vegans. Although even the Esselstyn ppl ate non-fat yogurt.
Your process is to disregard any studies whose results you don’t like by nitpicking minor details while ignoring all flaws with pro vegan studies
Another comment from someone who clearly didn't watch the video. 🤦♂️ Everything he said about research strategies was the same as what I learned when I took a course in college on how to write a research paper.
@@smudge8882 yeah except the problem is what I described is what he actually does.