Canon 6D Mark II vs 6D Specs and Image Quality Comparison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 сен 2024
- Check Canon 6D and Mark II
Amz ➭ geni.us/CtjUr
eBay ➭ ebay.us/x9gCvM
Instagram / omaghomrawi
+ Find me on Facebook OmaGhom...
RAW Images Download Link bit.ly/2HMklIp
6D Mark II REVIEW after 5 Months of Use / Third Party Flash Error Solved • 6D Mark II REVIEW afte...
My Main Sony Camera
Amz ➭ geni.us/gGR42
eBay ➭ ebay.us/XhXuEe
My B camera
Amz ➭ geni.us/gLLAROU
eBay ➭ ebay.us/EIBbFM
⚙️ Mini Motorized Slider
Amz ➭ geni.us/zmicro2
eBay ➭ ebay.us/X7wv6v
Review 🔹 • Compact Travel Motoriz...
All-use Rode Mic
REVIEW ➭ • Rode Wireless GO + Bud...
Amz ➭ geni.us/1igIzW
eBay ➭ ebay.us/wx4A4V
My everyday Backpack
Amz ➭ geni.us/8Me2gsb
eBay ➭ ebay.us/gOo764
Wireless Mic I use
Amz ➭ geni.us/vVTNK
eBay ➭ ebay.us/pxCzwy
REVIEW ➭ • Rode Wireless GO + Bud...
Lammcou Flexible Tripod
Amz ➭ geni.us/kDqs
eBay ➭ ebay.ttrioio/2...
Watch More +++++
A7 III vs 6D Mark 2 • Sony a7 III vs Canon 6...
ASTRO Review A7 III vs 6D Mark II • A7 III vs 6D Mark II A...
A7 III vs A7s II vs 6D mark 2 vs a6500 Low Light Video Quality • A7 III vs A7s II vs 6D...
Canon 16-35 f4 vs Sony Zeiss 16-35 f4 REVIEW • Sony Zeiss 16-35 f4 vs...
Canon 50mm f1.8 vs Sony 50mm • Sony 50mm vs Canon 50m...
Canon OLD 100mm f2.8 Macro vs NEW 100mm f2.8L Macro • OLD vs NEW Canon 100mm...
• NEVER BUY Variable ND Filter • NEVER BUY Variable ND ...
• 7 Camera HACKS in 90 Seconds! • 7 CAMERA HACKS in 90 S...
• Compositing Real Bus and Beach + Photoshop Editing • Compositing Real Bus a...
#Canon #Canon6Dmarkii #6Dmarkii
Check Canon 6D and Mark II
Amazon ➭ geni.us/CtjUr
eBay ➭ ebay.to/2mfugf2
The original 6D is still the absolute king of the budget cameras. If you want it purely for photography you can not go wrong, from the very first picture you showed I thought the original 6D looked better. It’s only drawback is it’s autofocus system, so as long as it isn’t needed for fast paced photography it’s a fantastic budget option today.
Stop whining
@@unbroken1010 whining? For saying the 6D is a great budget camera? Shut it you muppet.
The noise results make sense. The original 6D has bigger pixels. I’ll keep shooting my original 6D happily. Plus I really like that the center focus point on the original works down to -3EV. This is a lifesaver in low light :)
Moni Ker i agree. I have a 6d mark i and love it. Not good for sports...but for the other purposes...is a MACHINE GUN. The Center point is wonderful and the image quality the best Canon have made.
Try viewing them at the same size. For the 26MP sensor to display the same pixel level noise as the 20MP would require almost a stop of improvement.
Your using two different lenses... this comparison isn't really fair at all.
Sure different lenses perform differently. Such as vignetting, chromatic aberration, distortion, the difference in colors.
But has nothing to do with ISO and noise. It is the sensor job 👍🏻.
uhhhh, transmission?
how many years between the 2 models? The differences should have been more obvious. It's a rehoused version of the same camera?
After 6years the sensors should not even be close. Canon dropped the ball on this one just to protect the successful 80D. Makes little sense
What about sharpness? Unfair comparison.
Ok here's my take. The 6D2 is half 6D, half 80D. Image quality of the 6D and features and focusing of the 80D.
You definitely right Darth. I agree with you
So 80D is better?
i have the old 6D, i use it for 5 years and now the camera seems broke (like the rubber peal off and the dial mode plate ripped off) still can use it properly but i want to upgrade. 5D mark4 is a game changer but the price is insane, should i go to the 6dmark ii? please give me advise :) i do a product and food photography work
@@fullandstarving Save and buy a used 5d mk 4
@@reckerproduction9468 thank you.. i owned 5d mk 4 :))
I am very happy with my OG 6D. My next canon will be a 5D series but no time soon for that one.
Wait until they release a 5D that can actually beat the OG 6D, i own the OG 6D, i have tried it out against the flagships, 5D Mark IV etc, i rented various camera's, tried it for astrophotography, the 6D was a clear winner, there isn't a single body that canon makes that beats the 6D in terms of low light performance.
long time 6D user here, am about to add either a 6D2 or 5D4. Both are noisier if you pixel peep like this, but npoise is so easy to remove, I use DXO Pure Raw and shoot regulalry at 6400, after processing look as good as a 100iso shot. I really wouldn't worry about noise unless you're shooting JPGs, but then why would buy an SLR if doing that?
This video came after I watch your a7iii series. Night and day excitement and reaction levels.
It takes time to figure out the style and the channel direction
There will likely be a firmware update coming in September that might improve the performance. After all, Canon did explicitly say that the 6D2 sensor offers better resolution AND better low light performance than the old 6D. The result we see here could be caused by a firmware bug or error. If the firmware update helps noise or DR noticeably, it will be a no brainer for many people. But maybe you should just get the 6D2 and focus on getting better GLASS which will make much more of a difference than the difference in performance between the 6D and 6D2.
I love my original 6D. The only big drawback is the focus points. I basically only use the middle point which is the only reliable crosstype point. Would be such a relief with more focus points since I do street photography
Thanks Omer. U answered almost all the questions I had
Malik Imran you’re welcome mate
I appreciate the review, but I wish you had compared them using the same lens instead of a 16-35mm and a 24-105mm. Plus, they are at different focal lengths (32mm & 35mm).
Josh Ellis, You have a point, but this doesn't affect the image noise.
Different lenses does only affect: Vignetting, Color Aberration, Distortion and Sharpness. It has nothing to do with noise.
@@OmaGhomrawi it actually affects light in 2 ways
perception - vignette
and light on the sensor (t vs f)
for example: a 85mm prime is about 2/3-1 stop brighter at f2.8 vs a 70-200 at f2..8 (it's transmission of light to the sensor is much better as there are fewer elements and shorter throw)
comparing a 16-35 @ 35 vs 50mm prime, the difference is even bigger because of vignetting and not sure how bad light transmission is
good review in any case, just wanted to mention for future reviews that you should take into account this especially when reviewing very similar cameras
Thank you @@avinersan got your point
At the highest ISOs I see similar levels of noise, at the lower ISOs the old 6D actually looks a bit worse, noisier and less sharp.
good review. keep it up brother. subscribing
My pleasure Minhaz. Best
i find that the 6d mk1 looks better. Sharper overall and less noise
In fact, it is. I have to test both image quality at 20 megapixel>
The higher noise on the mark ii might be from the larger image resolution..
Have you tested yet?
no I didn't
He's using two different lenses! Even thought it's at the same focal length, f4l, and iso.... different lenses are going to perform differently, even on the SAME body.
b1lf Hello Mate,
Sure different lenses perform differently. Such as vignetting, chromatic aberration, distortion, difference in colors.
But has nothing to do with ISO and noise. It is the sensor job 👍🏻.
mmm I don t think this tiny differences will change the final result of the photos. Yes they could have made the mark ii better but it will still be a huge step forward for those who come from canon apsc anyway. That is the real target of this camera.
1:48 I thought something is wrong with my headphones... :(
Thank you Omar.
you just saved me few thousand dollars.
do you have any other recommendation for canon users?
Hey Abed, If you are looking for better image quality is doesnt worth to upgrade.
However, I'm happy with the new 6D. It has Dual Pixel autofocus, Phase detection, more focus points. touch screen is an extra.
HDR Video sounds great. Interval timelapse is the functions we have been waiting for ages.
The processor is really good, you dont have to wait a long time to process 30 seconds exposure image.
Long story short, the new 6d mark is more like 6D image quality with 80D functions.
Take 60D and 80d as an example. Almost the same with new features.
THIS IS PERFECT FOR VIDEO FOR PROFESSIONALS NOT FOR AMATEURS
This video is really amazing . I love this video
Hey i love you review like literally loveeeeee how you focused on the main points , can you please make another in 5d mark iv and 6d mark 2 , please +subscribed , loved your sense of focusing the review only on the important stuff!!!
Hey sahej chawla. Will do my best to review both cameras side by side ;)
Thank you mate
Great review dude ! Thanks
Still think for run and gun video projects having the touch screen and DPAF gives the 6DMK2 some real advantages.
I don't really agree with you since a7iii is smaller and lighter. I'm using it for two weeks now. it is totally new experience.
Oma Ghomrawi ok - so the A73 touch screen and continuous AF is better
Great video man!
OK now people are complaining about the supposedly "bad" DR and high ISO performance, saying that it's even a bit worse than the old 6D. Now first HDR mode eliminates DR issues, and downsampling 26 MP images down to 20 MP (6D resolution) might clean up some noise. Besides that:
CanonWatch has rumors of a firmware update coming in September for the 6D mark II. And it may or may not improve DR and/or high ISO performance, or may/may not add some other feature(s) like ALL-I recording or even 4K video (but that's unlikely). The reason why I think it might help the 6D2's performance is this:
Canon did handicap this camera to protect their 5D mark IV. Now, they either did this by using old sensor tech or by handicapping the firmware. I'm inclined to believe they handicapped the firmware; there's no reason to use old sensor tech when you can achieve the same effect with firmware. Plus with firmware, you CAN fix it in case of a huge PR problem (which Canon DOES have right now). Besides, B & H's page on the 6D mark II explicitly says that *the 6D mark II's sensor offers improved low light performance compared to the old 6D*. There's another reason why it might be the firmware's fault and NOT the sensor's. And in that case they could fix the firmware and it would be a great camera, challenging the D750. Or it might even be a slight hardware update like they did to the 5D4 to add C-LOG.
Plus, if you notice, DXOmark has not released their scores for the 6D2 yet. Hopefully they'll wait until after the firmware update, to see what exactly the firmware update did to help the camera. Perhaps DXO is deliberately waiting for the firmware update, and that's a good thing if you ask me.
hopefully will be new firmware on the way. It is gonna help to improve the quality for sure
High Ground Productions, you sound knowledgeable, so I would like to share my thoughts. Omar, thanks for the video, by the way.
I have bought the 6D Mark II mainly because its articulated screen which serves a treat in certain cases. I fell in love with my original 6D, whose image quality is astounding. I had great expectations regarding the 6D Mark II and I have taken hundreds of pictures for pleasure as well as experimentation, following all the hoo-hah on the web before people even touched the camera. I have analysed RAW files in order to derive a conclusion on its so persecuted dynamic range and compared photos taken with both 6D Mark II and 6D original. Both indoors and outdoors, same lens, same settings, tripod, manually focused, no noise rejection at high ISOs or long exposures, both properly exposed and underexposed cases were covered. This is what I have found, so far:
- If you expose your photos properly (or maybe expose to the right) you will love the images from the 6D Mark II, there is no doubt about that. Highlight recovery is very good, no issues there.
- There are differences in RAW files between 6D Mark II and original. Is it just me, or do the 6D Mark II photos look a bit less “contrasty” that the 6D original? Not that you can’t adjust it post processing , of course, but just an observation. Call me paranoid if you want. Up to ISOs of 1600, as long as you have reasonably exposed your photos, or underexposed sensibly to pull highlights and then recover shadows, there shouldn’t be an issue. However, if you have either have a high-contrast, harsh scene that really calls for a very high dynamic range, or if you by mistake underexpose your photos quite a lot, the 6D Mark II is less forgiving than the original in pushing details out of shadows. For a boost above 1.5 - 2 stops, if you look carefully at your shadows there are all sorts of colour cast noise that starts detracting from your images. The 6D original does have the same issue but it can withstand much more of exposure push before it exhibits the same level of noise. The 5D Mark III is notorious for its underexposure performance, in fact it is shocking in certain cases and similarly not forgiving at all. But this is what baffles me: DXOMARK released the sensor results for the 6D Mark II, placing it at a very good position in the Canon League table with an overall score of 85 (6D original has scored 82, 5D Mark III 81, etc…). Not bad at all. It scores better at high ISOs and every lab who tested its print capabilities (higher number of megapixels) have granted it the highest of awards for the resolution it achieves, stating that it outperforms the 6D original hands down. Its dynamic range (now, here is the juice of the story) is 0.2 - 0.25 stops lower than that of the 6D original up to ISOs of 2000 or thereabouts, while at higher ISO settings they are on par. That difference should not be discernible at all. In real life though when you really push the 6D Mark II, you have weird magenta casts in the shadowed areas and more noise overall. Of course, these are scenarios that every photographer should be avoiding (using a shutter speed of 1/1000 when you should be using 1/250 is ridiculous), yet it points to the fact that there must be an oversight or something that Canon have done inadvertently. The 6D original on the other hand, seems to yield soft, mushy patterns in the shadowed areas, eliminating detail, still being more pleasing on the eye. Again, in 98% of the cases you have to be a nerd to notice this. Still, why?
- As you increase the ISO to 3200 onwards, the noise in the RAW files from a slightly underexposed 6D Mark II photo will become more noticeable than those of the original, BUT the 6D Mark II yields much better detail in sensitive textures. It is the colour rendition and detail at high ISOs that make the 6D Mark II a better camera than its predecessor. Noise wise though, the 6D original wins marginally. Again, the DR is pretty much the same and the signal-to-noise ratio better for the 6D Mark II, according to DXOMARK, so why the increased noise? Is it because the increased number of megapixels?
By the way, there is another thing I noticed during my experimentation, something I keep saying: when you keep increasing the megapixels, quite often you necessitate the use of pro level, expensive lenses to resolve your images, as the budgetary ones become inadequate. When I took photos with my ultra-wide lens, Sigma 12-24mm F/4.5-5.6 (decent lens but not as good as the same lens F/4 of the Canon 16-35mm F/4), the RAWs and JPEGs from the 6D original were much better. It was the lens, I think. After all there is always the “marrying” of a camera and lens and unfortunately the patterns there can often be unpredictable.
Why did Canon allow the 6D Mark II to have an on-par if not slightly less DR than the predecessor? All they needed to have done is ensure a DR of, say, 12.7 to 13 stops at ISO 100 (5D Mark IV has 13.7) and job done... everyone would be happy and the harbingers of doom would find another camera to talk about. Why this magenta cast at extreme settings? Why releasing a camera with a new, powerful image processor like the DIGIC 6 and not exceeding the DR of the predecessor by, say, half a stop? Surely, surely, there must be a firmware upgrade that improves this. After all, contrary to popular belief, firmware is not software. A lot of the potential of the camera must lie in algorithms that control hardware behaviour, I am sure you know what I mean. Have you heard anything in the gossip corners about a firmware upgrade? I called Canon and I managed to get through to one of their technical people. They are keeping very quiet about all these and they are not allowed to talk, as I gathered, although they listened to everything I had to say. They advised me to use the Canon DPP software and not Lightroom, because of possibly wrong Lightroom software routines and incompatibility with the Canon 6D Mark II codec, but I don’t buy that. The Canon software removes a lot of noise by eliminating detail and that is not good. I think it is in their interest to release a firmware update that will remove any weird colour casts at high ISOs, pump up the DR a bit and hopefully spread the bloody autofocus points a bit further than the middle... The 6D original is now a five-year old camera and they might discontinue it at some point. What better advertising weapon would anyone think that exorcising the dynamic range evil and making the 6D Mark II a worthy comparison to the mighty 5D Mark IV? Just a thought.
Do any of the above match your observations? I don’t know if I am doing something wrong. Have you heard anything of the firmware front recently?
Thanks a lot,
Michael
Michael Perdikakis There was a dpreview thread talking about the possibility of a firmware update in September, they're talking about that Canonwatch page. But it's November and Canon hasn't delivered. But most cameras do receive at least a couple firmware updates at least in the medium to long term. Also, I would advise you to compare the 6D and 6D2's ISO noise performance and detail retention using Canon DPP just as a comparison tool. It may be a bad editing software but the comparison using DPP might be worth it and I'd like to know the results. Maybe lightroom does handle the 6D2 files worse? Idk.
Michael Perdikakis Also AF point spread cannot be adjusted with firmware.
High Ground Productions Cheers bruv, I will try when I get the chance and I will let you know. There is a lot of mystery shrouding this camera, which I still think it is a good one. I tell you what, I might compare with the Mark III and Mark IV, I got them all here. I heard so many contradicting reports and reviews, that I need to take charge. One thing undoubted mind you: the battery duration. It is the best out there.
By the way, have you done any experiments yourself?
Thanks for replying, I do appreciate that.
well done, good review!
Excellent video - really liked the side-by-side graphics.
Thanks Bob. You're welcome.
This video is from my earliest one. Im making better videos now
Check this one, You may be interested as well.
Sony a7 III vs Canon 6D Mark 2 WORTH THE SWITCH? ruclips.net/video/Qd0HE12kR28/видео.html
Great review good job
My pleasure Leo.
Check my 6D Mark II REVIEW after 5 Months of Use
ruclips.net/video/jGX-T-9V0UU/видео.html
I checked it out. Would you like to sub to my channel I’m subbed to you. I’ll give a shoutout and you could do the same
Thanks mate I'm good
Nice review! Which camera I should get for Portraits, Traveling and Landscape??
Well, depends on your budget. I recommend Canon 80D (cropped frame) 6D m2 (Full Frame) 5D m4 is also a good option.
I believe 6D m2 is in the middle, fare price and really good result.
Omar Ghomrawi thanks! Is 6D M2 great with low light? It’s important to me because I used to shoot families with sunset background. I don’t want families look like paint art or grain look. :-)
Well, I have been using the camera for a long time. It is perfect in low light conditions. it has a good dynamic range as well to recover the shadows and highlights.
do you think 6d today stays a good one? I think I will buy one already used
Indeed Original 6D is really good the price. I'm sure you get used one for $800 maybe. Nice Photo quality, you gonna struggle a bit with autofocus zones
Arthur Lima I sold mine because I know have my sony a7rii and a6300...but damn I miss the still image quality and color render of 6d, and I’m looking to buy a used unit. It’s that good!
Thanks for your video and the information, I'm a newbie in photography and I want to buy a canon 6d or 6d mark II , now 6d mark II is 600$ more than the older one, so does the improvement in 6d mark II is worth 600$?
Hooman G Hi mate,
Please wach this video as well, my review after 5 months of use.
ruclips.net/video/jGX-T-9V0UU/видео.html
Long story short, mark ii has more focus points and still not covering the full frame.
Touch screen which mark i doesn’t. Honestly it is cool but you can still working without it.
However if you willing to use the camera for videos get the mark ii for sure.
Dual pixel autofocus, touch to focus and articulator screen.
Hooman G and in body image stabilization as well
Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you...
I found the people who say the truth. I subscribe to your channel. Congratulations! And Thanks again.
You are much welcome my friend. Im happy you get something from the video.
Pointless review when you use 2 different lenses (and notice that you also used 2 slightly different focal lengths about 10% apart.)
This should have been done on a prime such as a 35mm for the best possible comparison.
SCV community hey you have a point if Im comparing lenses, but Lenses do only affect sharpness, vignette, colors and Chromatic aberration.
I tested ISO and noise. There is nothing to do with lenses, it is the body job.
السلام عليكم
عمر انصحني أخذ كاميرا 6d او 6dii انا ابيها لتصوير الموديلز وفيديو لأجل المكياج اذا مافي ذاك الفرق الشاسع اكيد أرخص لي العاديه احتاج نصيحتك شفت مقاطع واللي فهمته ان العادي افضل
وعليكم السلام محمد
لتصوير الفيديو طبعا اشتري مارك 2 لأن فيها dual pixel autofocus
وبتساعدك كتير بتصوير الفيديو
انا تخليت عن كاميرات كانون وانتقلت ل سوني
انصحك ب Sony A7 iii أو Sony a6500
طبعا مع عدسات محترمة لجودة احترافية
nice to see someone from a place i know well
harpcab where are you from ? 😊
@@OmaGhomrawi from Philippines. been living in UAE for 4years. Al Reem was one of the best areas I like.
harpcab It’s a pleasure to me
I'm a makeup artist and looking for a good camera to take portfolio pictures which one should i buy?
Ps, your videos are amazing and detailed
Hi, in 2021 I highly recommend the Sony a6100 camera for your type of work.
You will also get better results when the camera is combined with a prime lens such as 35mm f1.8 OSS or 50mm f1.8 OSS
waww thx omar,what a great youtube content👍👍 you answer all my doubt 👍 Terimakasih dari Indonesia💐
Thank you for passing by Michael. This was the first review I posted on this channel lol.
haha first time i see the video too,great one👍
Excellent review. No bs. It would be cool if u did a side by side of video too imo
This is one of the first reviews I post on the channel. The next ones have been improved alot
thank you!
Thank!!
Watch a7 III vs 6D Mark 2
ruclips.net/video/Qd0HE12kR28/видео.html
Even on your website Omar I see similar levels of noise in the sky but the 6D2 has that ugly magenta cast (which is easily removed in Post?)
You are using different Lenses
I'm about tu buy a full frame canon, and i'm between these two models. What would you recommend?
hey Michelle M,
In terms of image quality both are almost the same.
Sure I recommend the new mark ii over the old one.
Honestly depending on your need. If you need the new functions go ahead get the new mark ii
6d Mark I is the best
500 dollars more and the 6D2 lost to the 6D at 12800 ISO. WHAT A JOKE!
6D seems to be the winner in terms of image quality. Did you test it against Sony a7 III ?
Hey, Thank you for reaching out.
Please check this video ruclips.net/video/Qd0HE12kR28/видео.html Sony a7 iii vs Canon 6D mark ii
You might be interested to watch this one as well.
A7 III vs A7s II vs 6D mark 2 vs a6500 Low Light Video Quality ruclips.net/video/SFeJv7ICg7M/видео.html
Perfect
hi man im really on a budget to buy a new camera (around 650 bucks) and i thought that the 6d would be a great camera but i don't know because i shoot sports but i need that high image quality and goood low light performances so what are your recommendations?
Hey, I built most of my portfolio on the original 6d camera. I recommend if you're on budget.
Higher megapixel expect more noise.
I think because of 6d ii has more megapixel that's why it has more noise.
Indeed, but canon should improve the sensor performance instead
شكرا..
6D is not for sport nor video. Therefore, it wins in anything else, 6D is the Master :)
I use 6d for sports like basketball game 😊
Omar, do you know anything about Rokinon 14mm chipped VS unchipped lenses? They are commonly paired with the 6D for astrophotography. I am trying to find a comparison between the two to see if it is worth the extra $100+ USD Thanks
Hey, my friend. Well as I know Rokinon and Samyang produce the same lenses. Literally same shape size functions and design.
I had Samyang 14mm lens for couple years. I gave to my sister when I upgraded to Canon 16-35mm.
The same I didn't find any comparison between two lenses.
I made my choice. I bought the 16-35mm f4. Hell yea the image is amazing much nicer, Less Vignette and less chromatic aberration.
My Name
عمر لو سمحت تنصحني بأي كاميرا لتصوير الطعام .. عندي فوجي xt3 وبفكر أبيعها وأشتري فل فريم ايه رأيك ؟ ايه الاختيار الأفضل ؟
انا صنعت بوتفوليو تصوير الطعام على كانون ٦ دي
في تصوير الطعام لن تفرق الكاميرا - يلزمك اضاءة جيدة و عدسة جيدة
@@OmaGhomrawi يعني مش هتفرق فل فريم من كروب فريم مع ملاحظة ان الفوجي
٢٦
ميجا والكانون
٢٠ ميجا !؟
برأيي تقريبا نفس النتيجة
اذا كانت الإضاءة صحيحة
Oma Ghomrawi أشكرك كثيرا للإفاده 👍
I am a big fan of Canon, and I am thinking of buying a new DSLR or Mirrorless, but I am very disappointed with the Canon, as it seems they stopped in time.
At this time there are several brands that make DSLR's or Mirrorless using a technology much more advanced than Canon.
I would like briefly that Canon devotes more of its engineering to their DSLRs, especially in the video area.
For example: I would like the new 90D have stabilization in body and that was not electronic, because even with canon, lenses there are many lenses that do not have IS.
It's ridiculous to have STM lenses (lenses dedicated to video) and they do not have IS !!!!.
The 24mm pankake, the 40mm pankake, have no IS.
3 of their 50mm lenses that Canon has (f1.8, f1.4, f1.2), none have IS !!!
This is ridiculous.
The 50mm 1.8 STM lens has no IS ?????
The body of the DSLR also has no IS, how to make a decent video ???
Do we have to carry the tripod on our backs?
Please Canon we are in the century. XXI ...
The weak performance in high ISO's ....
The dual pixel video system is good.
Why not, in the next 90D give another strong attribute to your customers, for example an optical viewfinder for photo and another electronic for video?
I think it's urgent that Canon devotes more useful technology to their's DSLRs, because the competition is big and it's getting more and more aggressive.
Be carefull Canon.
Not everyone is willing to pay for a C100, C300, C500 or a C700 !!!!
have to pick full frame DSLR, which one should i go for ? is it worth of going for 5d mark4 or 6d mark2 or orginal 6d ?
HEY Navin, First thing you have to ask yourself before buying a camera. What are you gonna use it for ?
Hey Omar, I don't want to upgrade for next 5 years, i need full frame camera and i don't much care about the video quality mostly am using it for photography, the low light performance should be good + good dynamic rage, am not a pro user but if it meet that expectations i will stick with 6d or 6d mark 2 if that not 5d mark4 would be good option ? apart from these 3 if you can suggest me even in Nikon which model would you ? I can spend 2000$ - 4000$ Max for body, Thanks in advance!
Navin Raj never go for 6d m i
6d mii autofocus system is better then 6d mi
In terms of image quality 6d mi and mii have almost same quality.
I do not recommend to get the 5d mIV
SAVE MORE MONEY AND BUY LENSES INSTEAD
1DX mk2 :)
To me it look like both cameras perform the same. But the 6D2 seems to have little more dynamic range. So images may seem brighter. Try to turn down the exposure on the 6D2 at higher ISOs and it will look the same. But good review and thank you for the samples.
I felt the same as well. 6D m2 is slightly brighter.
You're welcome :)
Tamron 70-200 F2.8 G2 Vs Sigma 70-200 F2.8 Os Hsm.. What I Should Get For My canon 6D
Hey Zever, 70-200 F2.8 is a great range for Portrait. Unfortunately didn't experiment both lenses. However, I'm using 100mm f2.8 IS MACRO for Portrait. Really sharp at f2.8
Omar Ghomrawi Thanks 💜💜
hi dude, greatings from medellinn colombia, your video its awesome, but I don not have idea wich one its better for me..
6d o 6d mark II , big diference in price, can you help me
Hi Alberto. Greeting from Lebanon.
Well Regarding image quality, both cameras are the same. Mark ii has a faster processor and better focusing system.
You may get the Mark I and save some money. I used it for 4 years.
However, IF YOU THE MONEY it is better to get the new mark II. It performs better in live events, sports and portrait images because of the faster processor and the new focusing system.
if you are landscape photographer, it doesn't matter which one you get. in this case get the old 6D mark I and save some money.
Check my latest video, 6D mark II review after 5 months of use.
ruclips.net/video/jGX-T-9V0UU/видео.html
My pleasure.
dear sir please tell me im who get the camera both of this camera's 6D and 6D mark II
I didn't understand your question Usman
I need for prewedding purpose, is it ok to go with 6Dmark 2 over 5 d mark 4? i dont want a video, i just want to know the photo quality of 6d compare to 5D? Suggest which is better. Thanks in advance
Image quality wise. 5D mark iii is better than 6D mark I at high ISO.
Since the 6D Image quality is better than the mark II. Thus 5D mark III and IV quality is BETTER THAN 6D Mark ii.
However. I'm professional Photographer. Despite of price difference, I prefer 6D over the 5D.
5D has more functions I do not use, as well as the image quality is almost the same.
If you are on the budget. Go for 6D Mark II. Perfect autofocus, Dual Pixel Autofocus, and Phase detection. Autofocus on 6D Mark I really sucks.
Is it ok to go with lense 24 205mm with 6Dmark 2?
do you mean 24-105mm ?
Omar Ghomrawi yes, sorry for typoerror
dinkarmane93 Yea my friend 24-105 is the best kif lens.
There is 2 versions. USM and USM II
Both are amazing, the version II has faster autofocus, improved IS and silent autofocus. You not ganna hear the autofocusand IS motor sound.
mine is version I.
i have the old 6D, i use it for 5 years and now the camera seems broke (like the rubber peal off and the dial mode plate ripped off) still can use it properly but i want to upgrade. 5D mark4 is a game changer but the price is insane, should i go to the 6dmark ii? please give me advise :) i do a product and food photography work
6D is a great camera, I made most of my portfolio using the original 6D. However, you don't care much about autofocus points, and speed for the type of your work since you probably do manual focusing.
I don't recommend 5d m4 due to the price range. I personally love Sony a7 iii but maybe not gonna work for you since you have canon lenses.
6D m2 would be an option as well as also Canon EOS R
Check these videos:
Sony a7 III vs Canon 6D Mark 2 WORTH THE SWITCH ? ruclips.net/video/Qd0HE12kR28/видео.html
A7 III vs 6D Mark II ASTRO Review ruclips.net/video/KOs3OvrC4N0/видео.html
SONY a7 iii REVIEW after 16 MONTH OF USE ruclips.net/video/Jn0LVLSVoWA/видео.html
Hello. Is it possible to keep the shutter open for eg 60 seconds or more, like 7D using a remote control?
Thanks for your video.
🇩🇰
You can do that using the bulb mode
@@OmaGhomrawi using mobil or remotecontrol? I’ll cant find a Remote. 😢
Should I get a used Canon 6D or a Canon 77D?
Hello mate, sure go for 6d, full frame camera. better images quality better sensor.
If you are on budget 77d is a good option
Omar Ghomrawi oh thanks im going for the 70-200 f4l as i am shooting wildlife the 2.8 but without IS not a really good option
Look Sigma has very good quality and cheaper lenses. check it out.
if you are a wildlife photographer. Crop frame is better for you since your focal length gonna be multiplied by 1.6
80d is a good option as well. in fact, it is the best canon crop frame camera at the moment
check this one out.
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG APO OS HSM for Canon
www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/689577-REG/Sigma_589101_70_200mm_f_2_8_EX_DG.html
Check used ones for the better price on ebay and amazon as well.
Wow! Al Reem Island XD -I live there-..
Hey! Nice review.
Actually, I'd like to jump to full frame camera, i'm shooting a 70D, and was looking for the 6D (something for not pro-photo).
I'll miss the touchscreen, and also, drop down a couple focus points could be a shame, but at the moment the Mk II is expensive =/
Haaha we are neighbors though !
As you know mostly full frame cameras deliver better image quality than cropped sensors.
If you are not lookin for pro images. Stick to the 70d the moment.
6d mark ii is more like 6d quality with 80d functions.
new 90d is on the way next april. this might drop down the 60 m2 price.
Have a look on souq.com or contact me personally I know a broker in dubai has better prices than souq itself.
Best !
Hi, thanks for replay!
The thing is, i'm getting the oportunity to start to work as photographer.
Thats why i'd like get a plus in quality.
What you think about the AF in servo mode between both 6D? the improvement is big?
great video but u should use same lense anyway best try subscribed my next camera will be 6d old 💗
both lenses are high-end Canon L series. however, it doesn't affect when testing the noise, the noise is from the camera sensor not from the lens. Lenses may affect things such as sharpness, chromatic aberration, distortion and vignetting.
Why is the 6d more expensive than the second version on the Canon website?
Seriously !
If you're are into Canon, I do recommend the new mirrorless cameras instead. Canon RP and Canon EOS are good.
@@OmaGhomrawi I’m looking for the best weather proofed camera I need a very good mirror less camera that can withstand alittle water I want to record and take some pictures of my kayak trips is there any you could recommend for me doesn’t have to be canon I just need the best
whats the red thing hanging from the side of your camera?
Hey, it is peak design anchor links Peak Design Anchor Links amzn.to/2OamsUn
Learn more on peakdesign.com
ha ha, I have the first version of 6d and i will not change :)
Ну и молодец, а я купил м2 и сравнил одну и туже картинку, с одним и тем же стеклом и понял что 6д реально отстаёт по хроматики, резкости, и контрасту.
это все на уровне правки RAW , зато вторая шумит больше , хотя это тоже не критично и легко устраняется :) ДД тоже в пользу м1 (12.1 против 11.9) , как по мне то все это фигня , различий по картинке минимум и заметят только дрочеры , лучше бы исправили качество видео , а то как был ужас так и остался .
What is better of picture quality 6d mark 1 or 6d matk 2
As the test result. old 6d has better image quality over the new 6d
Thanks 😍😍😍😍😍😍
Kirolos Shihed which camera you currently have?
Fabulous
But the 6D2 looks a little sharper at high ISO's?
What is wrong with you mate.
Omar Ghomrawi I just find it very hard to believe that a camera with a much newer sensor, much newer processor, and higher native ISO range can have worse noise problems than its predecessor. Could be a bug, or something - the difference is quite small.
Darth Kenobi indeed the difference is little small. But mark is not better. Do you think I would be sad for being better.
I already preordered the camera as I wished it has better image quality. At least it should has the same as the old 6D.
However I still prefer the mark ii over the old one. As you mentioned it is 80d functions on 6d quality.
You may also check other reviews on the web. They have same as my results.
Omar Ghomrawi I'll buy it but rely heavily on HDR photos and videos. Turns out you're actually getting just a teeny bit less quality than the old 6D. But guess what? HDR mode levels the playing field - It should be great for most things that don't move fast - landscapes, portraits, cityscapes, astro, etc. HDR VIDEO is not present in the 6D at all and I think it helps make the 6D2 a better video camera than the 6D - Dual Pixel AF, 60fps at 1080, a flipscreen, digital video stabilization, 4K time lapse, and that all-important HDR video make this a very practical video camera. I will use it.
Darth Kenobi Sure all these functions make me sacrifice the tiny unnoticeable extra noise over the old model.
Im not saying it is bad camera! But speaking of less noisy camera is not the true winner.
ياعرب محتاجين مقاطع مثل هذه
6d mark ii or 5d mark iii??? Please answer
6d m2 has video autofocus 5d m3 doesn't
5d m3 has better image quality in stills than 6dm3
6d m2 has flipped screen
5d m3 has headphone jack
Oma Ghomrawi i use for photography 70% and video 30%, which one should buy?
@@4rabs75 I never owned 5d mark 3. I currently using Sony a7 iii since 2018. However, I recommend 6d m2 if you're doing both video and stills,
I see no difference or even less noise in the 6D2 and I'm watching on a large laptop screen
Darth Kenobi No, old 6D image quality looks better
Identical lenses should have been used imho
Hey, thank you for reaching out.
Lenses would affect Chromatic Aberration, Sharpness, Flare, etc.. Eventually, I'm testing Noise at high ISO. Nothing to do with Lenses.
I actually see less noise in the 6D2
RUclips video compression might hide tiny details.
However, check 200% images in the following link: www.omarghomrawi.com/single-post/6Dmii-vs-6D
wtf why the hell you did a comparison on diffrent lenses?
Hope you're smart enough to realize that Lenses have nothing to do with noise in low light.
Lenses affect sharpness, chromatic aberration, and vignette.
So the 6D mark ll sucks over the original one????
Hey Daniel Galvan. Beside the new video features in mark ii
I see no difference in ISO performance between the 2 cameras.
yeah, the mk2 appears noisier because of the larger resolution image
perhaps.
Unfair lens comparison.
Lenses has nothing to do with noise at high ISO,
It doesn’t matters what lens you use for this specific test
How on earth can a new model has worst picture quality than its predecessor. That makes no sense. Aren't we missing something, maybe?
Your review confirms all the others. The 6D MK II is a low dynamic noise machine.
no
Have been using the mark 2 for five months now.
I tend to agree that it is a pretty nice camera. And I do not feel it has low dynamic range at all. Will make hands on review soon
orgnal 6d bast
Why so less subscribers...?
The channel will grow with the support of people like you :)
Yep...
I love short content, to the point...
Youre doing great... Just deserve few more thousand subscribers...
thank you mate, I appreciate your feedback.Have a great time :)
Very unfair comparison !If you want to compare the noise levels, please donwsize the image from 6d mark ii to 20mp...if not,there is absolutly non sense.
Why downsizing to 20mpx since the new camera is technically 26mpx.
Cause thats the way you can compare iso...if you compare 50mpx 5DSR to the 20mpx 6D it will be still bad...when you have more mega pixel,you zoom more into the picture and the iso is obvious...for that reason the best Canon 1dx mark ii and (mark i) was made only with 20 mpx,i am not saying that the more mega pixel is bad,but if you print big thats ok,but the oposite not realy.
Also...you must use exactly the same lens..cause every lens gives you different amout of color shift and sharpness...i have downloaded the files that you have puted into the desrciption,i have tried to match the exposure and color shift...as far i can see the new 6d mark ii i the same story az the old 6d,the iso is slightly different (the pattern) but the noise levels are the same.
Indeed I tested only ISO not sharpness or chromatic aberration. Lenses never affect ISO or Noise, it is body matter.
and regarding downsizing, I don't really agree with your point of view since we're gonna use the mark 6 at 26mpx not 20mpx.
I believe that is why the new mark 2 looked noisier and has more noise pattern. Thus Canon should make new sensor to match higher mega pixels.
6D m2 + 16-35mm vs 6D 24-105mm LOL
Hey Duc, I really doesn’t matter which lens you use when you test Noise and Grain.
Lenses has nothing to do with Grain at low light conditions. Variety of Lenses could affect, sharpness, vignettes and chromatic aberration, which didn’t even discuss.
Have a great time :)
why not you ahoot the same lens 😂? may be different image quality.... 😁
Are you aware that I tested noise in low light, not lenses sharpness ?
uHAUHAHUHUAUHUAHUHAUHUA. Canon is kidding everybody!!!!! Shame!!! You guys keep buying canon. you guys are idiots!!! canon is in ruin. 6d is better than 6dmkii . i NEVER see anything like that.... the "up-to-date" camera being worse than its previous one. lol Canon is like a big joke!
6d is not better. In fact 6d2 has improved SNR. and 6d2 has improved AF, burst rate, video, processor, etc. etc
The Panasonic G9 (which is "only" a m43 camera) has better dynamic range, better usability, better af, better video features, and also what? Cost less
Canon just earn money from the brand, they can sell crap things and still make money
Everything in this video is nonsense .. no scientific comparison.
Poor presentation