Yeah it's good because Andrew Neil (the interviewer) is on the Right of UK journalism, well, as rightwing as possible for a "impartial" BBC presenter. So it's good that he's happy to hold Boris to account.
"Get the details right on this paragraph!" what about the immediate next paragraph? "Uhh I have no idea what details are of the rest of this article" and you're the favourite of Tory party donors?
Of course he is, he is offering a tax reduction for them using the emergency £39 Billion brexit budget meant to help the entire country through the difficult economic stresses caused by Brexit. Why wouldn't they back free money? Oh what about the country? Since when did tories care about anyone else other than their millionaire donors?
I'd argue that it's beneficial to the bankers who have bet on no deal to get someone without any clue to lead Brexit. Any sane person would immediately stop the process if they knew what the end result would be.
@@thepodcastcrew1113 yes remain did lie and have continued and the demographics haven't changed see if you read remain polls they will say we want to remain but others read real polls and we want to leave still Trouble with polls is they are unreliable for example polls suggested that remain would win the referendum also polls suggested the Brexit party would win the Peterborough by election wrong both times
@Silverclod 141 Democracy means following the rules and respecting the minority. The rule in the UK is that parliament decides. If Parliament decides that staying in the EU is better, this is perfectly democratic.
Ultimate hard Brexit scenario: They all laughed at Johnson, until he hired Minecraft redstone engineers to make the whole island walk away from Europe.
If not for Andrew Neil, no one would have seen through it bar the experts. Who, upon correcting Boris, would be labelled remoaner elites. Welcome to UK politics 2016-present.
Unfortunately the vast majority of voters will not see through any of this. They will see that some people think Article 24 is an option but other people think it is not an option and voters will choose to believe whoever they want to agree with. This is why we have Brexit to begin with.
@@AaronJCassidy Bingo, huge respect for Neil. THIS is what journalism should look like, asking the hard questions, not playing around with words to pander to your own audience.
@@AaronJCassidy it's the second time he's used that line, at least to my knowledge. Last time was perhaps the debate with Hunt, was equally as fake and ott.
I guess it could mean tarrifs/free trade remain but we don't need to abide by ecj, free movement and so on? It's not going to happen though so another pointless rabbit hole
@@stephenweir9871 which would be a basic requirement to any deal that keeps the status quo on trading. You only get acces to the European Market by following the rules, this includes freedom of movement.
@@Suscida An extension implies the UK is still subject to all the rules (including free movement), regulations, authorisations and dispute mechanisms (that is, the ECJ) currently in play. So, yes, BoJo is talking arrant rubbish (as always).
That part was actually clever from Johnson. By saying this with confidence, he essentially says to the viewers that it's not a big deal, that paragraph 5c is unimportant. Untrue, but it's not said explicitly. Very clever rhetoric. His comeback was less clever.
@@benowen8321 It's not just part of a huge volume of information that would be useful to know. It's key information that renders his plan impossible. It's mind-boggling that his plan that rests on paragraph 5b is stopped in its path by a subsection within the same bloody paragraph. It means that Boris Johnson has not just read the article 14 that is key to his plan. He hasn't even read the entirety of the tiny paragraph that is the most important of them all. That's insane!
Person who vocally demonstrates that he has no fundamental understanding of Brexit is the current favourite to lead the Tories and steer the nation through Brexit. Dear God, we’re well and truly buggered!
You were buggered the moment the feckless Cameron instituted a referendum on a major constitutional matter on the basis that 50%+1 was good enough to upend the status quo. It was a 52-48 result that showed a divided nation that remains divided. Ireland's vote for same-sex marriage was 62-38, as was Australia's plebiscite. Those results are the sort that can be readily implemented as representing a clear majority. 52-48 for a big change? That's tough. Just wait until Brexit is a done no-deal. That 55-45 Scottish thing will reverse and the solution to best protect the interests (economic and human rights) of the various groups in NI from British interference or neglect will be for NI to go into the EU, too. I believe Brexit will be the undoing of the UK.
@@Hiltok and a 52% win would have probably been ok if it had been stated what leaving meant. Was it a norway type deal? No deal? etc... As it is the 52% can't agree what they want beyond leaving. It's like a group of people who vote to go to get Pizza but not agreeing on what type they want to order. Meanwhile Theresa May is shouting "Pizza means Pizza".
Firsthgyhgyhuy Lastujhujhuj defending boris Johnson is becoming harder and harder ain't it. Its a thankless job fighting for someone so ridiculous, knowing he's going nowhere, as is your life since you have to side with a buffoon of such proportions... How does it actually feel? You're so going nowhere that this man has your trust and devotion
@@Elghast Well, I certainly agree with your sentiment against Johnson, but seeing him on his way to No 10, and having Trump in the White House, I 'm afraid that these buffoons are going a long way :'(
WOW .. THE REAL PEOPLE WHO DONT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING ARE THE LIBERAL LEFT GLOBALISTS WHO ARE UNABLE TO GET ANYTHING RIGHT ON ANY SUBJECT.. SO HERE ARE THE BASICS ON BREXIT...BREXIT IS VERY SIMPLE - 1/ WE BUY MORE FROM EUROPE THAN THEY DO FROM US AND THEY WONT DESTROY THEIR TRADE - SO THEY ARE IN NO POSITION TO DEMAND ANYTHING. 2/ BREXIT MEANS WE WILL SAVE COUNTLESS MILLIONS SPENT ON SUPPORTING THE BULLY BOYS OF BRUSSELS. 3/ MOST IMPORTANTLY WE WILL BE ABLE TO SHUT OUR BORDERS TO OUR PART OF THE INVASION FROM THE MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA THAT THE E.U. SUPPORTS THIS HAS BEEN MULTI MILLIONS FOR ABOUT A DECADE AT LEAST).... NOT WANTING YOUR COUNTRYTO BE INVADED DOESNT MEAN YOU ARE A ENOPHOBE/RACIST/NAZI -OR ANUY OF THE OTHR LIBERAL LEFT LIES THAT THEY USE ON A REGULAR BASIS. THIS INVASION HAS BROUGHT MASS RAPES, CHILD MOLESTATIONS, VILENT ASSAULTS (IE ACID ATTACKS) AND MURDER (KNIFE CRIME AND TERRORISM)... EVEN IF THEY WERE ALL DECENT WE NEED TO STOP IT. YOU NEED SECURE BORDERS FOR THE SAME REASONS YOU HAVE DOORS ON YOUR HOME: TO STOP PEOPLE COMMING IN AND TAKING/DESTROYING/STEALING YOU STUFF, SQUATTING, OR THREATENING/BEING VIOLENT TO YOURFAMILY... AND INTHE SAME WAY UNINVITED GUESTS SHOULD BE KICKED OUT..EVEN GUESTS ARE THERE DUE TO YOUR GOOD NATURE AND HAVE NO RIGHT TO BE THERE ...WE NEED TO DEPORT ALL THE INVADERS FROM AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST..FOR MORE RELIABLE INFOR ON WHAT IS REALY GOING ON SEE LIKE LAUREN SOUTHERN(SEE HER DOCUMENTARY 'BORDERLESS'),RED ICE TV, AND PAUL JOSEPH WATSON..
Also read in today's Telegraph that US are demanding UK tow the line on Huawei and China as a precondition for a trade deal...and I thought we were supposed to be taking back control ...
5. Instruction for parachute jump. PARACHUTING 101; SECURELY FIT AND WEAR A PROVEN, WELL PACKED, FUNCTIONING PARACHUTE. 5a. Jump out of aircraft 5b. Free fall for 400ft 5c. Pull ripcord
NO -DONT TAKE ANYMORE SHIT FROM LYING LIBERAL LEFT GLOBALIST TRAITORS ..EXPOSE THEM ANYTIME YOU CAN..BREXIT IS VERY SIMPLE - 1/ WE BUY MORE FROM EUROPE THAN THEY DO FROM US AND THEY WONT DESTROY THEIR TRADE - SO THEY ARE IN NO POSITION TO DEMAND ANYTHING. 2/ BREXIT MEANS WE WILL SAVE COUNTLESS MILLIONS SPENT ON SUPPORTING THE BULLY BOYS OF BRUSSELS. 3/ MOST IMPORTANTLY WE WILL BE ABLE TO SHUT OUR BORDERS TO OUR PART OF THE INVASION FROM THE MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA THAT THE E.U. SUPPORTS THIS HAS BEEN MULTI MILLIONS FOR ABOUT A DECADE AT LEAST).... NOT WANTING YOUR COUNTRYTO BE INVADED DOESNT MEAN YOU ARE A ENOPHOBE/RACIST/NAZI -OR ANUY OF THE OTHR LIBERAL LEFT LIES THAT THEY USE ON A REGULAR BASIS. THIS INVASION HAS BROUGHT MASS RAPES, CHILD MOLESTATIONS, VILENT ASSAULTS (IE ACID ATTACKS) AND MURDER (KNIFE CRIME AND TERRORISM)... EVEN IF THEY WERE ALL DECENT WE NEED TO STOP IT. YOU NEED SECURE BORDERS FOR THE SAME REASONS YOU HAVE DOORS ON YOUR HOME: TO STOP PEOPLE COMMING IN AND TAKING/DESTROYING/STEALING YOU STUFF, SQUATTING, OR THREATENING/BEING VIOLENT TO YOURFAMILY... AND INTHE SAME WAY UNINVITED GUESTS SHOULD BE KICKED OUT..EVEN GUESTS ARE THERE DUE TO YOUR GOOD NATURE AND HAVE NO RIGHT TO BE THERE ...WE NEED TO DEPORT ALL THE INVADERS FROM AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST..FOR MORE RELIABLE INFOR ON WHAT IS REALY GOING ON SEE LIKE LAUREN SOUTHERN(SEE HER DOCUMENTARY 'BORDERLESS'),RED ICE TV, AND PAUL JOSEPH WATSON..
WHEN FACTS AND LOGIC PROVE YOU WRONG - ACT LIKE A LIBERAL LEFT TYPE AND MAKE A PERSONAL INSULT (NICE TRY REGGIE BUT AS YOU WILL SEE AS USUAL IT HAS BACKFIRED)... SO WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THAT OPPOSING THE INVASION OF YOUR COUNTRY MAKES YOU MENTALLY ILL??.. THIS WILL BE GOOD... NOW WE SHALL SEE REGGIE SHOW US HOW BRAINWASHED HE IS.. OH BEFORE YOU REPLY YOU MIGHT LIKE TO VISIT LAUREN SOUTHERN, RED ICEE TV, PAUL JOSEPH WATSON AND MILO AND GET INFORMED OFTHE FACTS FIRST...
It was pitiful to be scrutinised by just 27 other countries. I feel so much better that we have taken back control, and now we can be scrutinised by a proud number of 164. Yes, I especially voted for the prospect of being scrutinised by China and India. (oh shut up, shut up at once!) Sorry, I was scolding the ironic laughter of history.
It won't won't do any good scolding the ironic laughter of history when history has followed up by successfully targeting you with a great big scalding piss...
I fundamentally disagree with Andrew Neil about a great many things, but you cannot argue that this man is not a good interviewer and journalist. He actually tries to get to the bottom of what his guests are all about, calling them out when needed and not worried about confronting them. It's just a real shame his worldview and political beliefs are so askew.
At least he’s educated in his worldview and can back up his arguments. Unlike Johnson as shown in the interview. Although I disagree with his politics I’d feel a lot safer with someone such as Andrew Neil running for PM
@@giglefreakz Climate change is real. The thing that isn't real is the "man-made" effect upon it. The Earth has always had climate change, it goes in cycles. The Sun has cycles which obviously affect the Earth. So NO man is not affecting climate change, the Sun is. Man is affecting the Earth in a negative way, by chopping down forests, killing off insects, animals, plants and killing off trees by spraying the skies with chemicals! That is the real man-made catastrophe! Some call it Geo-engineering, some call it Chemtrails, but it is definitely real and affecting the planet, and definitely something that should be stopped! CO2 etc. is not the real issue. Have a great day mate! 🏴👍🤗🏴
@@jamescusack6511 Climate change is real. The thing that isn't real is the "man-made" effect upon it. The Earth has always had climate change, it goes in cycles. The Sun has cycles which obviously affect the Earth. So NO man is not affecting climate change, the Sun is. Man is affecting the Earth in a negative way, by chopping down forests, killing off insects, animals, plants and killing off trees by spraying the skies with chemicals! That is the real man-made catastrophe! Some call it Geo-engineering, some call it Chemtrails, but it is definitely real and affecting the planet, and definitely something that should be stopped! CO2 etc. is not the real issue. Have a great day mate! 🏴👍🤗🏴
He doesn't think he needs to understand because he has been allow to get away with things purely on his "bumbling charisma" or so I heard that he has something that constitute charisma. When someone like him or Farage gets away by just their mouth, they think they can do it indefinitely... until they don't, that's when everyone else have to pay along with him.
It is their total lack of shame that allows them to say anything, no matter how stupid, with utter confidence that makes them seem 'charismatic'. Confident people seem like they know what they are doing, even when they have no clue.
i just dont get people tbh. how is it even possible that a person that quite clearly has no clue about the subject matter has a seat at the table? you want the electrical systems in your new house to be installed by an expert and you want your dentis to know what he is doing, but international trade agreemens? or running a country? anyone can do those right? it just stunns me how low the bar for politicians is. there are incredibly talented negociators, leaders and financial gurus in the uk, and then there are goverment emloyees like johnson.... bottom of the pile in every metric, leadershipskill, charisma, knowledge, intelligence, integrity, articulate, empathy, foresightfull, etc. etc. etc. big old zeros across the board and he is only one of many.... so there is obviously something wrong with the system...
Exactly my idea. On the other hand it would be a very short video if the title would have been 'What Boris Johnson Understands About Brexit'. In fact there wouldn't be a video at all.
@@SusseBo Unfortunately when a country has had a history of exploiting colonies it tends to get used to getting the better side of a deal but now, unfortunately, its negotiating team no longer consists of its army and navy.
I must confess, I have switched sides, I am now a hard brexiteer! Yay! Why you may ask? Well, I have had it. You can’t argue with brexiteers. They have thick skulls and virtually no understanding of facts. Now I want the worst form of brexit. Cliff edge no deal hard brexit. Pure and unadulterated. I want the brexiteers to find out exactly what they asked for, and I hope the EU are absolutely brutal, esp with boris as the PM. I want the brexiteers to find out how it feels to be on the ‘outside’ of the comforting EU blanket. As for the remainers, I’m sorry, I really am. If you cared so much, you should have turned up for EU elections in vast numbers and given Farrage a bloody nose.
The way the leavers could get what they wanted would be to just not enforce any of the rules that would stop the free movement of goods across Ireland, and since Ireland won’t enforce them, the British will get their free trade with the EU without having to pay their membership fee. This is what the leavers want.
I agree totally, I am also fed up with the whole debacle...... I am living currently in Germany but was born and bred in Yorkshire, so for me I hope it wont be that much of a hassle, even if the hard deal comes to term!
@@misselany4412 I'll be laughing so hard when we leave and you utter traitorous dogs are crying your fucking eyes out, that shit is going to be hilarious. I can see the trollin' is going ro be epic.
@@AaronJCassidy Even worse. Why can't people just accept that both sides have some points for and against and leave it at that? Why does it have to be so black and white? The only one to blame for all of this is your former prime Minister, really. She clocked it up real good for 3 years and now there's nothing anyone can do about it.
I absolutely lost it at that first clip. I haven't been keeping up with the news much these past 2 weeks, but holy hell that made me hit the floor in laughter!
Why is it the moment someone says something negative about Brexit, or anyone supporting Brexit, they're immediately labeled a Remainer and biased against it.
@@thebrsrkr6428 First, if the UK does leave, it needs to leave with a solid understanding of the facts so that it can prepare. Convincing people that the UK can carry on, as is, because you stopped reading a treaty once you got to the part you liked, does not prepare people for the consequences of this decision. Secondly, the UK doesn't have to leave. A second referendum where popular vote overturns the previous referendum is justified and in line with democratic principles. Going back on leaving the EU would really only hurt the Tory party, which isn't a problem to me.
Because the overlords don't like boris Johnson that's why he's been slagged off by most media outlets just like how everything trump ever said or did was all of a sudden terrible it's like fake outrage mobs that don't bother to look into anything themselves because the BBC is all they need 😂😂😂😂
Why don't we just give up the Tory leadership election and appoint the winners of Love Island? Also, Katie Price for UK Ambassador to US? Trump would probably pay more attention to her...
Yeah because politics has turned into a celebrity show, whos participants are so busy trying to be the most popular to take any seriousness in their work,
If it's any consolation, none of these clever bastards could explain what Mr. Trump was going to do, and many of them are refusing to believe what he HAS DONE. Lacking confidence, you have nothing...
@@Pal.Cockrum most of us do but what political institution doesn't have short comings? The EU has certainly demonstrated more capability than the UK government.
Problem is so many still believe it's possible, it's practically a cult of belief now. Even arguing against the WTO Director General who like you quoted/referenced said that the main No deal scenario that Hardcpre brexiteers follow isn't possible.
@@BatteredWalrus who do you think makes up these silly rules? Its all bollocks and the UK should be able to leave the EU and still trade under the terms that exist right now. All these "problems" are man made and rules can be changed. They change the rules when it suits them.
@@allanlarmour7460 No rule was changed, and the rules say that you are only allowed to trade like an EU member when you are an EU member. Rather simple and logic.
For more than a year the simple WTO rule is reiterated: If you have no trariff with one country w/o deal than you have no tarrifs with all other countries w/o deal. Why is this so difficult to process?
It's not difficult to process, it's difficult to accept. The elites are used to get it exactly the way they want all of their lives and cannot imagine otherwise.
Niall Higgins Awesome! Tariff free it is then! Our (the US) agriculture sector can grow food in absolutely colossal quantities, to the point we often pay farmers not to grow. So, here’s what tariff free means for the UK: Every country that can grow food cheaper than the UK floods your market with their food. Your farmers can’t compete. They go out of business. Then the foreign companies can raise prices after the competition is gone. The UK gets screwed. Now...still want to eliminate those tariffs?
@@MaxVliet another brainless comment you only need a few words and a pathetic "lol" for. And one big finger to hammer repetitively on the exclamation mark button. Yes that is this button with the straight line and the dot.
He reminds me of someone... a big blond guy with a running mouth and a superb ignorance of the laws and any technical detail... Now who might that be? You know, this flashy stupid guy who got himself elected as president, on the other side of the pond...
Sorry you are wrong. Average 14 year old would appear sharper than BJ. I'm not joking this is true - BJ is intelligent but he needs to keep his message simple, very simple, for his fan base. He is going to screw us all just to get power. He doesn't care. He is evil, not stupid.
Also, the part you admit to not understanding was simply a fairly standard clause in treaties which advises that the provisions under discussion of the treaty do not override other arrangements you may already have in place.
"Hey look guys, he said the wrong word! This semantic detail was very crucial to understand the context of his question and pointing it out wasn't petty at all! He dumb, me smart, right?" - Johnson's thoughts, 100%
"It's gonna, be great! You'll see, we've got this whole thing and it's gonna be great. Just you wait and see." Homer Simpson: Ok Mr Trump, I trust you!!!
These guys, like Johnson and Farage, don't care how this hurts Britain. They will profit from the split and THEIR profits are all the care about. This is what an Eton education creates in the way of citizens. This is the same mentality the bankers displayed a few years ago - "we don't care how much this hurts everybody else, it's making a bundle for us." That's also why Farage wants to move to US style insurance for medical care - it'll hurt the populace, but greatly profit himself.
@@Andrewx4 It's a play on the boxing term the great white hope, which I do find racist as in the whiteness of a boxer should make us appreciate them more, but considering the fact that he will be made PM by an overwhelmingly white, older, male electorate with negative views on immigration, I think it works, especially as he doomed to failure like all of the great white hopes, apologies for upsetting your sensibilities!
Jp Barrett I don't think racially fueled rhetoric is helpful for social cohesion. Do you? The rights of voters and people in general should be respected, even the ones you don't agree with
@@Andrewx4 I'd agree if we weren't talking about an individual who used fear of Turkish accession to the EU as a means to get votes, i don't remember him being critical of the breaking point poster and he also spent years as an EU reporter stoking fears of Germany taking control of the EU. A great white dope is what he is, the only thing missing from that description is feckless, irresponsible, entitled and utterly void of any positive characteristic bar looking like a bit of a laugh!
I'm a little worried. Despite going full time on TLDR and devoting all your time to it, the editing is getting a bit dodgy. There have long been audio glitches, but now they're creeping into the video as well.
@@jokuvaan5175 Nope, the fact is that we are in the phase where people are tired and they just use extreme way to overcome obstacles, like before WWII the world is entering the "chaos" starting a war followed by a phase of peace.
He has been destroyed so many times by so many interviewers, but people just don't care. He truly is the political personification of a malignant Cancer. You can obliterate him completely in one place, but somehow he will survive and manifest somewhere else, undeterred and no less capable of causing relentless damage.
@@Yora21 First of all we will have to pay more to the EU, as the second biggest net contributer is leaving. And our export will suffer. So will have to face our own problems.
I wish we had journalists like Andrew Neil here in the U.S.; I disagree with his political views but he makes sure to set them aside and hold every politician accountable.
Oh God,Boris. Look at the law :- Articles 24 5 (b); "Article 5 (b )....... may be; and (c) any interim agreement referred to in subparagraphs (a) and (b) shall include a plan and schedule for the formation of such a customs union or of such a free-trade area within a reasonable length of time." As a lawyer I would say Boris is completely wrong to ignore 5 (c) because as the excerpt clearly states 5 (a) 5 (b) are only applicable if the conditions in 5 (c) apply. So, he is wrong . He cannot rely solely on 5 (b)!!!!!!!
There already is an agreemernt and the EU has said over and over again that they will stick with it so BJ is only bullshitting. What remains is to bendover to Trump.
One doesn't seclude the other. The candidates are crap AND the media is biased against them. Which is why they get away with it. They've been hunted by the media for so long, they can just dismiss any kind of criticism as a biased witch hunt and their followers are happy to ignore whatever's been said.
I want out too. I agree the BBC is biased. But I have watched Andrew Neil on "This Week" for years even before Brexit!! He will have a go at anyone; left , right, Brexitiers and remainers.
@@keithshelley370 Yeah but he's a dying species. Consider that the journalist is slowly dying out, because if you have to compete with free online news, you have to prioritize quantity and clickbait over quality and in-depth journalism. The confrontation between Neil and Shapiro speak for all I think. In-depth journalism and questioning vs. buzzwords and loud noise.
There is another tricky bit with this whole WTO shenanigans. As you said, such an agreement between the UK and the EU (which is an agreement also the 27 remaining EU member states would have to agree to) would need confirmation by all the other WTO members - as you stated 164. The tricky part here is: The EU itself is indeed a WTO member, but each EU member state is still one of the 164 members of the WTO. Not sure that came through in your video(s).
But that's where the bargaining power comes from right? If a non-EU member wanted to veto something and EU country wanted to do, it's likely they've got that agreement with another EU company country that could scupper some sort of deal they have with them. Now we've left we're all alone and at the mercy of all 164 of them
@@captainmaim With open plans to prorogue Parliament to get his way on a no deal Brexit ? I know Trump wishes to deport members of congress based on skin tones but how is that not dictatorial ?
He says he will solve the Northern Ireland/Republic of Ireland border during the implementation period, even though if he gets No Deal as he desired there will be no transition period
Technically I advocate the plan of “doing nothing” with the Irish border as a cynical way to get free trade with the EU without paying an access fee just because the EU and Ireland can’t stop the movement of goods across the Irish border because of the Good Friday Agreement. Smuggling is a great way to avoid the EU’s tariffs destroying Britain, and no one can do anything about it if it is all done over the Irish border. It will slow trade down, but that is far cheaper than paying the tariff or the price of membership.
@@evannibbe9375 As the UK breaks the GFA with crashing out as the UK turns itself to a third country. It says in the GFA that it is between 2 EU countries (UK and Ireland) as the UK destroys it and replaces it with no other treaties they cause the mess.
Boris' main issue is, that he apparently believes the empire still exists. Reality is, that the Empire is olde history and that the former subjects all have thier very own interest way beyond the old master... with many of them likely having somewhat of a grudge and now having their own might to dictate terms in their favour. And he apparently also believes that the "saying "No" and sitting out" tactic still works... PM May tried it and it failed spectacularly, because Art. 50 has the clock running against the leaving party. He also forgot about why many international corporations put up tents in the UK: besides being corporation friendly, because the UK was EU member and as such member of the Single Market and Customs Union. With the Membership gone, the business friendliness will be found in other countries, such as the Netherlands and Ireland. ...also wasn't he supposed to lie in front of a bulldozer, to prevent the new runway in Heathrow?
as an irish person I remember being a young child in London in the 80's when there was an IRA bomb scare. My dad whispered to me to stay quite cus he didn't want anyone to hear our accents. I'm really quite proud of how the relationship between our countries has changed since those dark days. It's great to see so many english, welsh and scots having the craic in dublin. And i never feel unwelcome in any part of brittain. Although it's not the full story, the EU played a big part in that new reality I hope all that good work will not be undone by selfish politicians who would trade the peace and prosperity of europe just for personal political gain
@@derekscanlan4641: Reality is, with a hard Brexit, the Irish reunification is becoming a solid option. Not just that, but the Scots are likely to leave the UK as well, since large parts of the remain in the UK was actually a vote to remain in the EU. A "Celtic Union", a federation with a unified Ireland would be Scotlands priority ticket back to the EU.
Hmmm... For once Google translate is useful... That's the great thing about legal language... It can only be understood one way. Even if that one way has multiple interpretations. In that case the language was deliberately chosen that way ;-) In any case... "The provisions of this agreement shall not be construed to prevent advantages accorded by any contracting party to adjacent countries in order to facilitate frontier traffic." translates in Dutch to "De bepalingen van deze overeenkomst mogen niet worden geïnterpreteerd als zijnde een beletsel voor het voorkomen van voordelen die door een verdragsluitende partij aan aangrenzende landen worden toegekend om het grensverkeer te vergemakkelijken." In non-legalese English that means: The content of the agreement cannot prevent existing advantages that one party gave to the other party in order to make border traffic easier. Or: Since the UK is part of a customs union which avoids tariffs, the UK may not reinstate tariffs after Brexit while using the GATT agreement as this would prevent the tariff free frontier traffic between the EU and the UK (which means between NI and Eire)... So GATT article 3 prevents the UK from leaving the customs union as long as GATT is used unless they can prevent a hard border between the EU and the UK... Essentially GATT = backstop, but with an additional 164 potential vetos...
The EU is not going to agree on any future deal or negotiations , if the UK does not firstly agree on the divorce, the divorce bill, the northern Ireland border backstop, and the protection of EU citizens in the UK. When will them British understand that there is nothing after a no deal, its the cliff edge remainers warned about.
The Title should be "why Boris Johnson will not get his deal passed" You may be incorrect that he does not know that. or that he does not understand Brexit.
You may be unbiased, but the way you deconstruct brexiteer arguments often leaves little to no saving grace to them, showing that the preferable option clearly is remain. All Johnson did with this interview is illustrate why he avoided giving them throughout the leadership race except when he had to be on TV. He should not be Prime Minister, but alas, Brexit does not care much for cold hard facts and he will still move into Number 10.
@@ionnanskilliorus6877 Nope, not at all. Just pointing out that while they don't directly pick a side, there clearly only remains one. Because a lot of "unbiased" reporting on TV at least comes down to allowing people like Johnson spew their lies and fantasies without questioning them. This interview was a nice change from that though because it clearly showed the many problems Johnson and his hard line brexiteers have.
the problem is, there's no other way to present it, in case you didnt realize, the problem is, the thing he is clinging to as safe net, ONLY works IF they have a deal. there's no sugar coating this, you cant have a no deal, and hope to use a "deal only" safe guard. it doesnt work like that!
He may yet prove to be more damaging, frankly. Trump talks the talk but doesn't often walk the walk; he hasn't done much actual harm, he just acts like a child on Twitter. Boris may, for all we know, turn out to be a total monster of a politician. The problem I'm finding is that he's so skilled at dissembling from his real personality for comic effect (years of practise on comedy panel shows) that it's impossible to tell what he really plans to do.
Increased border protection and immigration control, genuine and effective attempts at peace in foreign nations, a booming economy with record unemployment rates, all of the screeching, thoughtless detractors. You make it sound absolutely brilliant.
TDLR seems pretty unbiased to me, but sometimes the HEADLINE is biased, even when the content is not. "What the hell is Boris Johnson's Plan?" is biased. Why not just "What is Boris Johnson's plan?" Make headline writers adhere to common journalistic standards, not marketing ones.
The bias is normally very subtle. Notice the overall direction of the video to guide the viewers towards a desired outcome. In this video the bias is in the editing style.
We don't need more challengesn in ETS2, having to drive on the wrong side of the road and having our trucks with steering wheels on the passenger side is quite enough, thankyouverymuch.
The expression on Johnson’s face when he had to admit he doesn’t know what was in 5c was funny and scary at the same time . It was like a naughty schoolboy caught not having done his homework but instead of being sorry he wants to whack the teacher for catching him out .
So in order to get round the problem of leaving the EU without an agreement, the UK would need an agreement with EU prior to invoking GAT article 24(B\ C). I will point out that Russia has already said they would block any such request. BoJo you are a typical self serving politician, someone who would say anything to get a lick of the brass ring.
I thought that was WTO and not gat24? In any case reverting to WTO rules would just mean Russia doesn't trade with us they can hardly prevent us reverting to WTO rules?!
@@Darkwintre GAT is part of WTO, but is not the only agreement within WTO. TBH I don't really know what Russia can or cannot do, but they mean to do it out of spite.
Anyone offended about this channel being biased about Bojo of Brexit needs to wake up. There’s differences in political views and then there’s just pure stupidity. Anyone who agrees with Bojo, or that Brexit was ever a good idea just hasn’t done their homework. Sorry to put it so bluntly, but “not hurting people’s feelings” isn’t helpful at this point...
Aaron Cassidy Yeah but normally when you agree with your political opinions are similar its harder to be a good interviewer because you essentially have to play devils advocate.
Aaron Cassidy Oh I don’t plan to be. I try and be factual but I don’t hid my bias. Instead I’m upfront and honest about my opinions which I try and back up with facts.
"No no no. You will follow the questions I want to ask. not the ones you want to be asked."
I like this guy already.
Yeah it's good because Andrew Neil (the interviewer) is on the Right of UK journalism, well, as rightwing as possible for a "impartial" BBC presenter. So it's good that he's happy to hold Boris to account.
@@gregoryfenn1462 I mean right wing or not, if he's willing to put a stop to boris's bullshit he's someone I respect
Yeah, I liked that bit.
I wish more American journalists would do that!
If only everyone else could do that
"No, no, no, no, NO! You will follow the questions I want to ask, not the questions you want to be asked."
Wow. You don't see that in US TV.
Or UK TV to be honest
Andrew Neill is good at pinning people down but this was an extreme example
😍
@@Cunnysmythe Paxo asking the same question 19 times?
@@ray-wm7yd How could I forget! Legendary.
He wasn't as direct and blunt and though, he just didn't give up
pretty rare on british sadly
"I thought you were a man of detail"
Damn Andrew Neil is savage, I love it!
"Get the details right on this paragraph!" what about the immediate next paragraph? "Uhh I have no idea what details are of the rest of this article" and you're the favourite of Tory party donors?
Yeah cause he's gonna drive it into a no deal and then it's finally over, they're all screwed and UK will hopefully wake up..
Of course he is, he is offering a tax reduction for them using the emergency £39 Billion brexit budget meant to help the entire country through the difficult economic stresses caused by Brexit. Why wouldn't they back free money? Oh what about the country? Since when did tories care about anyone else other than their millionaire donors?
I'd argue that it's beneficial to the bankers who have bet on no deal to get someone without any clue to lead Brexit. Any sane person would immediately stop the process if they knew what the end result would be.
He's the favourite because they think this buffoon will win them the next election. Yeah the public aren't that stupid.
It's the most evident example of cherry-picking.
Boris is right that continuing as at present would be very attractive. So lets just stay in the EU.
Why the majority voted out
@@stephenweir9871 A vote based on lies and the demographic has now shifted
@@stephenweir9871 The referendum was advisory only, it isn't legally binding. The Government could choose to ignore it.
@@thepodcastcrew1113 yes remain did lie and have continued and the demographics haven't changed see if you read remain polls they will say we want to remain but others read real polls and we want to leave still
Trouble with polls is they are unreliable for example polls suggested that remain would win the referendum also polls suggested the Brexit party would win the Peterborough by election wrong both times
@Silverclod 141 Democracy means following the rules and respecting the minority. The rule in the UK is that parliament decides. If Parliament decides that staying in the EU is better, this is perfectly democratic.
Ultimate hard Brexit scenario:
They all laughed at Johnson, until he hired Minecraft redstone engineers to make the whole island walk away from Europe.
I can see why you like Boris. It's the mutual attraction to fantasy.
@@heliotropezzz333 no chill
@@heliotropezzz333 r/woooosh
@UCZ8I5GPQZOdlkCzdmtxPXWw I mean if he's that thick, he'll fit in with the majority of the population, so...
@@johntap6109
That's an insult to the British lumber industry! 😂😅🤣
He used that paragraph 5-B line like it was supposed to impress us. Clearly rehearsed and we all saw through it.
But he must be the expert, he insisted the interviewer not use a perfectly workable and correct abbreviation.
If not for Andrew Neil, no one would have seen through it bar the experts. Who, upon correcting Boris, would be labelled remoaner elites.
Welcome to UK politics 2016-present.
Unfortunately the vast majority of voters will not see through any of this. They will see that some people think Article 24 is an option but other people think it is not an option and voters will choose to believe whoever they want to agree with. This is why we have Brexit to begin with.
@@AaronJCassidy Bingo, huge respect for Neil. THIS is what journalism should look like, asking the hard questions, not playing around with words to pander to your own audience.
@@AaronJCassidy it's the second time he's used that line, at least to my knowledge. Last time was perhaps the debate with Hunt, was equally as fake and ott.
So he wants to leave but trade on the current rules untill a new deal is agreed. How is this different from an extension?
I guess it could mean tarrifs/free trade remain but we don't need to abide by ecj, free movement and so on? It's not going to happen though so another pointless rabbit hole
Coz an extension means we must follow EU rules and laws
@@stephenweir9871 which would be a basic requirement to any deal that keeps the status quo on trading.
You only get acces to the European Market by following the rules, this includes freedom of movement.
@@Suscida An extension implies the UK is still subject to all the rules (including free movement), regulations, authorisations and dispute mechanisms (that is, the ECJ) currently in play. So, yes, BoJo is talking arrant rubbish (as always).
@@Markus-zb5zd hence voting to leave
"Do you know what's in 5c?" Boris: No!
This shows how clueless but also confident in his work Boris is. WE ARE SO FUUUCKEEED!
You are right they should memories all important documents 100%.
Thanks to your pm soon to be :) actually a lot of forex traders in my country expecting a lot of happenings with gbp
That part was actually clever from Johnson. By saying this with confidence, he essentially says to the viewers that it's not a big deal, that paragraph 5c is unimportant. Untrue, but it's not said explicitly. Very clever rhetoric.
His comeback was less clever.
@Anon Wibble Exactly. There is insane amount of information that Boris should know, but could not possibly know due to the sheer volume.
@@benowen8321 It's not just part of a huge volume of information that would be useful to know. It's key information that renders his plan impossible. It's mind-boggling that his plan that rests on paragraph 5b is stopped in its path by a subsection within the same bloody paragraph. It means that Boris Johnson has not just read the article 14 that is key to his plan. He hasn't even read the entirety of the tiny paragraph that is the most important of them all. That's insane!
Person who vocally demonstrates that he has no fundamental understanding of Brexit is the current favourite to lead the Tories and steer the nation through Brexit. Dear God, we’re well and truly buggered!
You were buggered the moment the feckless Cameron instituted a referendum on a major constitutional matter on the basis that 50%+1 was good enough to upend the status quo. It was a 52-48 result that showed a divided nation that remains divided. Ireland's vote for same-sex marriage was 62-38, as was Australia's plebiscite. Those results are the sort that can be readily implemented as representing a clear majority. 52-48 for a big change? That's tough.
Just wait until Brexit is a done no-deal. That 55-45 Scottish thing will reverse and the solution to best protect the interests (economic and human rights) of the various groups in NI from British interference or neglect will be for NI to go into the EU, too. I believe Brexit will be the undoing of the UK.
Brexiteers would prefer the Tories weren't involved at all at this point.
It's not the first time the UK has been royally shafted up the arse by it's own government. Remember the 80s?
@@Hiltok and a 52% win would have probably been ok if it had been stated what leaving meant. Was it a norway type deal? No deal? etc... As it is the 52% can't agree what they want beyond leaving. It's like a group of people who vote to go to get Pizza but not agreeing on what type they want to order. Meanwhile Theresa May is shouting "Pizza means Pizza".
Hey, I guess Brexiters are well represented then
Boris Johnson not understanding something? Stop the presses folks, and raise the font size several sizes so he can puzzle his way through the words.
Firsthgyhgyhuy Lastujhujhuj defending boris Johnson is becoming harder and harder ain't it. Its a thankless job fighting for someone so ridiculous, knowing he's going nowhere, as is your life since you have to side with a buffoon of such proportions... How does it actually feel? You're so going nowhere that this man has your trust and devotion
@@Elghast Well, I certainly agree with your sentiment against Johnson, but seeing him on his way to No 10, and having Trump in the White House, I 'm afraid that these buffoons are going a long way :'(
WOW .. THE REAL PEOPLE WHO DONT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING ARE THE LIBERAL LEFT GLOBALISTS WHO ARE UNABLE TO GET ANYTHING RIGHT ON ANY SUBJECT.. SO HERE ARE THE BASICS ON BREXIT...BREXIT IS VERY SIMPLE - 1/ WE BUY MORE FROM
EUROPE THAN THEY DO FROM US AND THEY WONT DESTROY THEIR TRADE - SO THEY ARE IN
NO POSITION TO DEMAND ANYTHING. 2/ BREXIT MEANS WE WILL SAVE COUNTLESS MILLIONS
SPENT ON SUPPORTING THE BULLY BOYS OF BRUSSELS. 3/ MOST IMPORTANTLY WE WILL BE
ABLE TO SHUT OUR BORDERS TO OUR PART OF THE INVASION FROM THE MIDDLE EAST AND
AFRICA THAT THE E.U. SUPPORTS THIS HAS BEEN MULTI MILLIONS FOR ABOUT A DECADE
AT LEAST).... NOT WANTING YOUR COUNTRYTO BE INVADED DOESNT MEAN YOU ARE A
ENOPHOBE/RACIST/NAZI -OR ANUY OF THE OTHR LIBERAL LEFT LIES THAT THEY USE ON A
REGULAR BASIS. THIS INVASION HAS BROUGHT MASS RAPES, CHILD MOLESTATIONS, VILENT
ASSAULTS (IE ACID ATTACKS) AND MURDER (KNIFE CRIME AND TERRORISM)... EVEN IF
THEY WERE ALL DECENT WE NEED TO STOP IT. YOU NEED SECURE BORDERS FOR THE SAME
REASONS YOU HAVE DOORS ON YOUR HOME: TO STOP PEOPLE COMMING IN AND
TAKING/DESTROYING/STEALING YOU STUFF, SQUATTING, OR THREATENING/BEING VIOLENT
TO YOURFAMILY... AND INTHE SAME WAY UNINVITED GUESTS SHOULD BE KICKED OUT..EVEN
GUESTS ARE THERE DUE TO YOUR GOOD NATURE AND HAVE NO RIGHT TO BE THERE ...WE
NEED TO DEPORT ALL THE INVADERS FROM AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST..FOR MORE
RELIABLE INFOR ON WHAT IS REALY GOING ON SEE LIKE LAUREN SOUTHERN(SEE HER
DOCUMENTARY 'BORDERLESS'),RED ICE TV, AND PAUL JOSEPH WATSON..
Tries to discredit the interviewer, " Article 24, Paragraph 5B. Get your details right!"
Gets his arse handed back to him on the very next instance.
I hope you can get a great trade deal with the U.S. They are completely trustworthy....
Like president Trump always says "put other countries first". I think it's something like that anyway :p
US congress already said that it will veto any trade deal in case of no deal Brexit, because this breaks the Good Friday Agreement.
Also read in today's Telegraph that US are demanding UK tow the line on Huawei and China as a precondition for a trade deal...and I thought we were supposed to be taking back control ...
The UK had been trumped! What a disaster!
Trump..."Step into my parlour said the spider to the fly"...
5. Instruction for parachute jump.
5a. Jump out of aircraft
5b. Free fall for 400ft
5c. Pull ripcord
Yvonne Edwards 5d crash
5a. Lie down
5b. Try not to cry
5c. Cry a lot
I will bounce
5. Instruction for parachute jump.
PARACHUTING 101; SECURELY FIT AND WEAR A PROVEN, WELL PACKED, FUNCTIONING PARACHUTE.
5a. Jump out of aircraft
5b. Free fall for 400ft
5c. Pull ripcord
Very clever Yvonne!
Hell of an interviewer - didn’t take any more politician shit. Mad respect for that man
He’s a pretty heavy hitter in interviews. Doesn’t matter who is it, he never pulls a punch
NO -DONT TAKE ANYMORE SHIT FROM LYING LIBERAL LEFT GLOBALIST TRAITORS ..EXPOSE THEM ANYTIME YOU CAN..BREXIT IS VERY SIMPLE - 1/ WE BUY MORE FROM
EUROPE THAN THEY DO FROM US AND THEY WONT DESTROY THEIR TRADE - SO THEY ARE IN
NO POSITION TO DEMAND ANYTHING. 2/ BREXIT MEANS WE WILL SAVE COUNTLESS MILLIONS
SPENT ON SUPPORTING THE BULLY BOYS OF BRUSSELS. 3/ MOST IMPORTANTLY WE WILL BE
ABLE TO SHUT OUR BORDERS TO OUR PART OF THE INVASION FROM THE MIDDLE EAST AND
AFRICA THAT THE E.U. SUPPORTS THIS HAS BEEN MULTI MILLIONS FOR ABOUT A DECADE
AT LEAST).... NOT WANTING YOUR COUNTRYTO BE INVADED DOESNT MEAN YOU ARE A
ENOPHOBE/RACIST/NAZI -OR ANUY OF THE OTHR LIBERAL LEFT LIES THAT THEY USE ON A
REGULAR BASIS. THIS INVASION HAS BROUGHT MASS RAPES, CHILD MOLESTATIONS, VILENT
ASSAULTS (IE ACID ATTACKS) AND MURDER (KNIFE CRIME AND TERRORISM)... EVEN IF
THEY WERE ALL DECENT WE NEED TO STOP IT. YOU NEED SECURE BORDERS FOR THE SAME
REASONS YOU HAVE DOORS ON YOUR HOME: TO STOP PEOPLE COMMING IN AND
TAKING/DESTROYING/STEALING YOU STUFF, SQUATTING, OR THREATENING/BEING VIOLENT
TO YOURFAMILY... AND INTHE SAME WAY UNINVITED GUESTS SHOULD BE KICKED OUT..EVEN
GUESTS ARE THERE DUE TO YOUR GOOD NATURE AND HAVE NO RIGHT TO BE THERE ...WE
NEED TO DEPORT ALL THE INVADERS FROM AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST..FOR MORE
RELIABLE INFOR ON WHAT IS REALY GOING ON SEE LIKE LAUREN SOUTHERN(SEE HER
DOCUMENTARY 'BORDERLESS'),RED ICE TV, AND PAUL JOSEPH WATSON..
@@shaunclark425 I don't know if you should get off or back on your meds dude
WHEN FACTS AND LOGIC PROVE YOU WRONG - ACT LIKE A LIBERAL LEFT TYPE AND MAKE A PERSONAL INSULT (NICE TRY REGGIE BUT AS YOU WILL SEE AS USUAL IT HAS BACKFIRED)... SO WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THAT OPPOSING THE INVASION OF YOUR COUNTRY MAKES YOU MENTALLY ILL??.. THIS WILL BE GOOD... NOW WE SHALL SEE REGGIE SHOW US HOW BRAINWASHED HE IS.. OH BEFORE YOU REPLY YOU MIGHT LIKE TO VISIT LAUREN SOUTHERN, RED ICEE TV, PAUL JOSEPH WATSON AND MILO AND GET INFORMED OFTHE FACTS FIRST...
Caps lock - Cruise control for cool
At last someone actually tackled a Brexiter on GATT. They've been touting this crap for three years and even the WTO have refuted it.
It's not like everybody is telling them it completely doesn't work like they're planing it to work but they just keep ignoring it.
It was pitiful to be scrutinised by just 27 other countries. I feel so much better that we have taken back control, and now we can be scrutinised by a proud number of 164. Yes, I especially voted for the prospect of being scrutinised by China and India. (oh shut up, shut up at once!) Sorry, I was scolding the ironic laughter of history.
Or russia
Quality post
It won't won't do any good scolding the ironic laughter of history when history has followed up by successfully targeting you with a great big scalding piss...
what would be the word for it? Brexit supporters are ........( gullible, credulous towards populistic demagogy )
RUSSIA LIKE THOSE WHO SUPPORT BREXIT AND TRUMP ARE FOR THEIR PEOPLE AND OPPOSE THE EVIL OF THE LIBERAL LEFT GLOBALIST AGENDA..
I fundamentally disagree with Andrew Neil about a great many things, but you cannot argue that this man is not a good interviewer and journalist. He actually tries to get to the bottom of what his guests are all about, calling them out when needed and not worried about confronting them. It's just a real shame his worldview and political beliefs are so askew.
At least he’s educated in his worldview and can back up his arguments. Unlike Johnson as shown in the interview. Although I disagree with his politics I’d feel a lot safer with someone such as Andrew Neil running for PM
Exhonor whats his worldview? I haven’t seen too much about him and I’m curious to know what he’s about
@@jamescusack6511 Right wing climate change denier. Best way I can sum it up.
@@giglefreakz Climate change is real. The thing that isn't real is the "man-made" effect upon it. The Earth has always had climate change, it goes in cycles. The Sun has cycles which obviously affect the Earth. So NO man is not affecting climate change, the Sun is. Man is affecting the Earth in a negative way, by chopping down forests, killing off insects, animals, plants and killing off trees by spraying the skies with chemicals! That is the real man-made catastrophe! Some call it Geo-engineering, some call it Chemtrails, but it is definitely real and affecting the planet, and definitely something that should be stopped! CO2 etc. is not the real issue.
Have a great day mate! 🏴👍🤗🏴
@@jamescusack6511 Climate change is real. The thing that isn't real is the "man-made" effect upon it. The Earth has always had climate change, it goes in cycles. The Sun has cycles which obviously affect the Earth. So NO man is not affecting climate change, the Sun is. Man is affecting the Earth in a negative way, by chopping down forests, killing off insects, animals, plants and killing off trees by spraying the skies with chemicals! That is the real man-made catastrophe! Some call it Geo-engineering, some call it Chemtrails, but it is definitely real and affecting the planet, and definitely something that should be stopped! CO2 etc. is not the real issue.
Have a great day mate! 🏴👍🤗🏴
I corrected your slip of the tongue on the title, so that makes me an expert on the book!
have you read the book?
no.
He's a man of posh dinners , stuff handed to him on a plate
Boris: Article 24 Paragraf 5B!
EU: How about no.
karsten69 YOU SUNK MY BATTLESHIP
He doesn't think he needs to understand because he has been allow to get away with things purely on his "bumbling charisma" or so I heard that he has something that constitute charisma. When someone like him or Farage gets away by just their mouth, they think they can do it indefinitely... until they don't, that's when everyone else have to pay along with him.
It is their total lack of shame that allows them to say anything, no matter how stupid, with utter confidence that makes them seem 'charismatic'. Confident people seem like they know what they are doing, even when they have no clue.
They don't have to pay. Unless they're prosecuted, fined and locked up, naturally.
i just dont get people tbh. how is it even possible that a person that quite clearly has no clue about the subject matter has a seat at the table? you want the electrical systems in your new house to be installed by an expert and you want your dentis to know what he is doing, but international trade agreemens? or running a country? anyone can do those right? it just stunns me how low the bar for politicians is.
there are incredibly talented negociators, leaders and financial gurus in the uk, and then there are goverment emloyees like johnson.... bottom of the pile in every metric, leadershipskill, charisma, knowledge, intelligence, integrity, articulate, empathy, foresightfull, etc. etc. etc. big old zeros across the board and he is only one of many.... so there is obviously something wrong with the system...
There's no bar for politicians other than being elected.
Well an empty mind is easier to manipulate than a bright one. But i wonder who's the puppeteer? 🤔
The truth is Boris has no true understanding of anything
Except for one thing.....how to slyly work his way into the top job in Government. Other than that, you're right.
d@Firsthgyhgyhuy Lastujhujhuj Do not be so hard on the UK. It may be a theocratic monarchy, but at least it is part of the democratic EU.
Lol
@Finn MickCool Johnson also understands how to deal with traitors like you. Mark my word.
he's not too bad on Greco-Roman history, to be fair
A video with this title should last more than eleven minutes. A LOT more.
Im sure TLDR would make a follow up on that issue. Boris doesnt seem to know what hes talking about
Exactly my idea.
On the other hand it would be a very short video if the title would have been 'What Boris Johnson Understands About Brexit'. In fact there wouldn't be a video at all.
The channel's name is TL;DR.
I could whittle it down to 5 seconds. "Boris Johnson understands jack shit about Brexit."
@@twixieshores ahh but that would be about what he DOES understand. ;)
Please do go on, you're doing an amazing job!
Both Norway and Switzerland accept free movement of EU citizens and also pay an access fee.
GB wnats a freebie.
@@SusseBo Unfortunately when a country has had a history of exploiting colonies it tends to get used to getting the better side of a deal but now, unfortunately, its negotiating team no longer consists of its army and navy.
I must confess, I have switched sides, I am now a hard brexiteer! Yay!
Why you may ask? Well, I have had it. You can’t argue with brexiteers. They have thick skulls and virtually no understanding of facts.
Now I want the worst form of brexit. Cliff edge no deal hard brexit. Pure and unadulterated. I want the brexiteers to find out exactly what they asked for, and I hope the EU are absolutely brutal, esp with boris as the PM. I want the brexiteers to find out how it feels to be on the ‘outside’ of the comforting EU blanket.
As for the remainers, I’m sorry, I really am. If you cared so much, you should have turned up for EU elections in vast numbers and given Farrage a bloody nose.
Thing is they will sit on the pile of shit that used to be 'Great' Britain and blame the Remoners for not *BELIVING* in Brexit hard enough.....
The way the leavers could get what they wanted would be to just not enforce any of the rules that would stop the free movement of goods across Ireland, and since Ireland won’t enforce them, the British will get their free trade with the EU without having to pay their membership fee. This is what the leavers want.
I agree totally, I am also fed up with the whole debacle......
I am living currently in Germany but was born and bred in Yorkshire, so for me I hope it wont be that much of a hassle, even if the hard deal comes to term!
Could you make a video about what Boris Johnson *does* understand about Brexit? Or would it be too short? :P
Laughing to hard right now...
@@misselany4412 I'll be laughing so hard when we leave and you utter traitorous dogs are crying your fucking eyes out, that shit is going to be hilarious. I can see the trollin' is going ro be epic.
HE UNDERSTAND DEMOCRACY SNOWFLAKE REMOANERS DO NOT
Hahahahahahahahahahahahah
@@rgsnr8702 i think you are going to have to explain democracy to me, because i dont seem to agree with you. Please explain in detail for me. Ta
It's not bias to say that brexit is a really bad deal; it's the truth
Lachlan Campbell I mean that’s a matter of opinion
@@niallhiggins2342 It is a bad deal to everyone bar xenophobes. There, how's that?
@@AaronJCassidy Even worse. Why can't people just accept that both sides have some points for and against and leave it at that? Why does it have to be so black and white? The only one to blame for all of this is your former prime Minister, really. She clocked it up real good for 3 years and now there's nothing anyone can do about it.
Can someone tell me who benifits from it with no down side?
@@thebrsrkr6428 Then what is a point _for_ Brexit? Who benefits here?
And don't say millionaires.*
So Bojo is talking out of his nether orifice ... who ever would have thunk it?
marconatrix Etonians learning posh BS where ever it comes from it’s still BS but with a beautiful speaking voice. Buy it wow its hypnotic
Well, all those sniffing BoJo's nether orifice would believe it.
The Baffoon strikes again.
@@tecwynjones6532
Yn llygad ei le ... ei din ??? :-)
@@marconatrix Jyst y lygaid? Mêt, efo Boris, ei phen I gyd yw fynnu ei dîn.
I absolutely lost it at that first clip. I haven't been keeping up with the news much these past 2 weeks, but holy hell that made me hit the floor in laughter!
Why is it the moment someone says something negative about Brexit, or anyone supporting Brexit, they're immediately labeled a Remainer and biased against it.
Because the alternative is to realize there are legitimate arguments against Brexit and that the accuser hasn't thought of or doesn't understand.
Because it's too late otherwise. We can't change it and we have to leave. Simple as.
Err, this channel is remainer and biased against brexit, that is why i come.
@@thebrsrkr6428 First, if the UK does leave, it needs to leave with a solid understanding of the facts so that it can prepare. Convincing people that the UK can carry on, as is, because you stopped reading a treaty once you got to the part you liked, does not prepare people for the consequences of this decision.
Secondly, the UK doesn't have to leave. A second referendum where popular vote overturns the previous referendum is justified and in line with democratic principles. Going back on leaving the EU would really only hurt the Tory party, which isn't a problem to me.
Because the overlords don't like boris Johnson that's why he's been slagged off by most media outlets just like how everything trump ever said or did was all of a sudden terrible it's like fake outrage mobs that don't bother to look into anything themselves because the BBC is all they need 😂😂😂😂
Paragraph 6F says the UK is not allowed to leave the EU
Hahaa this tickled me a lot. Thank you 😂
Josh D. Stenner np
Why don't we just give up the Tory leadership election and appoint the winners of Love Island? Also, Katie Price for UK Ambassador to US? Trump would probably pay more attention to her...
I suppose if your plan is to let Mr. Trump have his way with you, that's a reasonable diplomatic plan...
@@captainmaim Well that's obviously Bojo the Mojo's plan so why bother ?
Wrong kind of attention... altho... keeping him distracted from important issues is probably worthwhile... but what's Price ever done to deserve that?
@@annoloki Haha, fair point!
Yeah because politics has turned into a celebrity show, whos participants are so busy trying to be the most popular to take any seriousness in their work,
BRexit: You just have to BEELIEEEVVVE! If flat-earthers, climate deniers and anti-vaxxers can do it, so can you...
That was brutal but hilarious.
You'd be surprised at the amount of overlap between these groups...
Just like Europhiles not seeing the short comings of the EU.
If it's any consolation, none of these clever bastards could explain what Mr. Trump was going to do, and many of them are refusing to believe what he HAS DONE. Lacking confidence, you have nothing...
@@Pal.Cockrum most of us do but what political institution doesn't have short comings? The EU has certainly demonstrated more capability than the UK government.
Well since the head of WTO said it’s not possible on WTO rules, it’s useless to even talk about it. I am pretty sure he does know his organization
Problem is so many still believe it's possible, it's practically a cult of belief now. Even arguing against the WTO Director General who like you quoted/referenced said that the main No deal scenario that Hardcpre brexiteers follow isn't possible.
@@BatteredWalrus who do you think makes up these silly rules? Its all bollocks and the UK should be able to leave the EU and still trade under the terms that exist right now. All these "problems" are man made and rules can be changed. They change the rules when it suits them.
@@allanlarmour7460 "They change the rules when it suits them." Isn't that what you want to do?
So on principle, is it bad or good to follow the rules?
Allan Larmour so what you’re saying is you want all the benefits of being in the EU and none of the costs.
That’s not how life works.
@@allanlarmour7460 No rule was changed, and the rules say that you are only allowed to trade like an EU member when you are an EU member. Rather simple and logic.
For more than a year the simple WTO rule is reiterated: If you have no trariff with one country w/o deal than you have no tarrifs with all other countries w/o deal.
Why is this so difficult to process?
Thank you for your compliance Perfect, go tariff free then?
PROJECT FEEEAAAAARRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lol
It's not difficult to process, it's difficult to accept.
The elites are used to get it exactly the way they want all of their lives and cannot imagine otherwise.
Niall Higgins
Awesome! Tariff free it is then! Our (the US) agriculture sector can grow food in absolutely colossal quantities, to the point we often pay farmers not to grow.
So, here’s what tariff free means for the UK: Every country that can grow food cheaper than the UK floods your market with their food. Your farmers can’t compete. They go out of business. Then the foreign companies can raise prices after the competition is gone. The UK gets screwed.
Now...still want to eliminate those tariffs?
@@MaxVliet another brainless comment you only need a few words and a pathetic "lol" for. And one big finger to hammer repetitively on the exclamation mark button. Yes that is this button with the straight line and the dot.
Boris Johnson looks like a 14 years old 60 years old. He acts and speak like he’s not graduated high school yet.
He seems to always be at least slightly smirking. It's so juvenile.
He reminds me of someone... a big blond guy with a running mouth and a superb ignorance of the laws and any technical detail... Now who might that be? You know, this flashy stupid guy who got himself elected as president, on the other side of the pond...
News flash. He hasn’t. His rich parents bought his qualifications.
Sorry you are wrong. Average 14 year old would appear sharper than BJ. I'm not joking this is true - BJ is intelligent but he needs to keep his message simple, very simple, for his fan base. He is going to screw us all just to get power. He doesn't care. He is evil, not stupid.
he is laughing at you not with you
Also, the part you admit to not understanding was simply a fairly standard clause in treaties which advises that the provisions under discussion of the treaty do not override other arrangements you may already have in place.
omg is this interviewer the same guy who embarassed Ben Shapiro?
Yes. And he's actually one of the more right wing interviewers in British media.
Yes. Though to be fair, all he did was ask questions. The person who really humiliated Ben Shapiro was Ben Shapiro.
@@MaxVliet yeah but Ben Shapiro is popular and no one ever heard of Neil so clearly Ben is right
Who TF is Ben Shapiro?
@@canutelyking6038 oh ignorance is bliss...
"Hey look guys, he said the wrong word! This semantic detail was very crucial to understand the context of his question and pointing it out wasn't petty at all! He dumb, me smart, right?" - Johnson's thoughts, 100%
deflection tactics 101
I have a feeling That Boris Johnson and Donald trump were separated at birth 😂
Well, both of them were born in New York
LionelwolfM. Soon to be reunited unfortunately.
evidently the surgery didn't go 100% to plan - the fukin state of the 2 of them!
"It's gonna, be great! You'll see, we've got this whole thing and it's gonna be great. Just you wait and see."
Homer Simpson: Ok Mr Trump, I trust you!!!
I think what you want to say is:
We are not against Boris Johnson or Brexit.
We are against lies and the lying liars who spread them
Boris almost said he would resign after being asked what he would do about paragraph 5c... Lol
These guys, like Johnson and Farage, don't care how this hurts Britain. They will profit from the split and THEIR profits are all the care about. This is what an Eton education creates in the way of citizens. This is the same mentality the bankers displayed a few years ago - "we don't care how much this hurts everybody else, it's making a bundle for us." That's also why Farage wants to move to US style insurance for medical care - it'll hurt the populace, but greatly profit himself.
That Interview showed some excellent journalism. Well informed and not backing off, but stand by the real topics.
I like this man!
'Get the detail right,' and then he went and spoilt it all by saying something stupid like 'No', the great white dope!
Jp Barrett I don't think his race is significant
@@Andrewx4 It's a play on the boxing term the great white hope, which I do find racist as in the whiteness of a boxer should make us appreciate them more, but considering the fact that he will be made PM by an overwhelmingly white, older, male electorate with negative views on immigration, I think it works, especially as he doomed to failure like all of the great white hopes, apologies for upsetting your sensibilities!
Jp Barrett I don't think racially fueled rhetoric is helpful for social cohesion. Do you? The rights of voters and people in general should be respected, even the ones you don't agree with
@@Andrewx4 I'd agree if we weren't talking about an individual who used fear of Turkish accession to the EU as a means to get votes, i don't remember him being critical of the breaking point poster and he also spent years as an EU reporter stoking fears of Germany taking control of the EU. A great white dope is what he is, the only thing missing from that description is feckless, irresponsible, entitled and utterly void of any positive characteristic bar looking like a bit of a laugh!
Jp Barrett He was also voted Mayor of the most multicultural city on Earth twice. So he clearly has supporters of all colours and creeds
Boris Johnson Cherry Picking strategy has an anticipated "NO" from the European Union.
Good, then we can just leave.
With a title like that I admire your restraint in keeping the length to 10:55.
I'm a little worried. Despite going full time on TLDR and devoting all your time to it, the editing is getting a bit dodgy. There have long been audio glitches, but now they're creeping into the video as well.
"Hit the bell icon" - is that just a picture of Boris, as he's a massive BELL.
@Finn MickCool I think that part was implied ;)
As an American, I did not understand the joke.
@@1337w0n It's a euphemism stemming from the fact that the glans of a penis is a little bell shaped.
END this pun mister.
Mike G. He sure is. Trouble is he looks certain to be next PM.
Can't believe he's gonna be pm ffs
'do you know what's in 5c'
'I would confide entirely in 5b'
'do you know what's in 5c'
'no 👉' 😂
I swear I cried...
did you know? I bet not.
Yup... the world is actually getting dumber (at least in politics)
sad
Only in some countries
The World isn't getting dumber. The stupidity is just exposed better thanks to the internet and with that the spread of information.
@@jokuvaan5175 Nope, the fact is that we are in the phase where people are tired and they just use extreme way to overcome obstacles, like before WWII the world is entering the "chaos" starting a war followed by a phase of peace.
Isn't that what a robust democracy is...dumb people learning from their mistakes (eventually)..
What are the chances of a general election being called after the UK gets a new PM?
Seems fair to let the people decide their own PM
When I feel bad I watch videos about Brexit and afterwards I feel less like a failure.
UK: Hey Ireland would you back us on this new trade deal? Just forget about that whole Good Friday agreement we tore up ok?
He has been destroyed so many times by so many interviewers, but people just don't care.
He truly is the political personification of a malignant Cancer. You can obliterate him completely in one place, but somehow he will survive and manifest somewhere else, undeterred and no less capable of causing relentless damage.
Petition to replace the BBC with tldr news. I'd gladly pay my TV license if it went toward this level of unbiased news.
Here's to the poor public servant having to watch this youtube vid to understand the limitations of the GATT article 24. Cheers buddy!
This is such high quality entertainment for us Germans. 😂 I wouldn't mind if news about Brexit were only broadcasted on pay-TV - i'd pay.
No. We're the ones who will have to put the shambles back together when the British come back to ask for economic aid.
Enjoy the show while it lasts. British politics has always been a charade.
@@Yora21
I am sure we can come up with countries that need our aid even more.
@@Yora21 First of all we will have to pay more to the EU, as the second biggest net contributer is leaving. And our export will suffer. So will have to face our own problems.
I wish we had journalists like Andrew Neil here in the U.S.; I disagree with his political views but he makes sure to set them aside and hold every politician accountable.
Loool! The ship is sinking and this clown was the best captain they could find? 😂😂😂
A bigger clown called corbyn is waiting in the wings
You know our unemployment is the lowest since the 1970s and our wages are growing faster than expected?
I will give to Johnson, he shows kids that if you just try hard enough you can be anything you want, even if you shouldn't.
3:16
"And how would you handle 5c?"
"I would res... I would confide entirely in paragraph 5b"
Oh God,Boris. Look at the law :-
Articles 24 5 (b);
"Article 5 (b ).......
may be; and
(c) any interim agreement referred to in subparagraphs (a) and (b) shall include a plan and schedule for the formation of such a customs union or of such a free-trade area within a reasonable length of time."
As a lawyer I would say Boris is completely wrong to ignore 5 (c) because as the excerpt clearly states 5 (a) 5 (b) are only applicable if the conditions in 5 (c) apply. So, he is wrong . He cannot rely solely on 5 (b)!!!!!!!
Want out and in the same time desperately hang on to the EU? Take the consequenses and bend over to Trump, you want to be in control don´t you?
they want to trade with the EU, not be ruled by it. Obviously, you cannot understand the difference.
There already is an agreemernt and the EU has said over and over again that they will stick with it so BJ is only bullshitting. What remains is to bendover to Trump.
brexiteers: MEDIA IS BIASED AGAINST OUR CANDIDATES
tl;dr: actually they're just crap
One doesn't seclude the other.
The candidates are crap AND the media is biased against them. Which is why they get away with it. They've been hunted by the media for so long, they can just dismiss any kind of criticism as a biased witch hunt and their followers are happy to ignore whatever's been said.
@@SwissSareth You can safely say that media is biased against everyone and it will be true. That's how irrelevant the statement itself is.
I want out too. I agree the BBC is biased. But I have watched Andrew Neil on "This Week" for years even before Brexit!!
He will have a go at anyone; left , right, Brexitiers and remainers.
@@keithshelley370 Yeah but he's a dying species. Consider that the journalist is slowly dying out, because if you have to compete with free online news, you have to prioritize quantity and clickbait over quality and in-depth journalism. The confrontation between Neil and Shapiro speak for all I think. In-depth journalism and questioning vs. buzzwords and loud noise.
There is another tricky bit with this whole WTO shenanigans. As you said, such an agreement between the UK and the EU (which is an agreement also the 27 remaining EU member states would have to agree to) would need confirmation by all the other WTO members - as you stated 164. The tricky part here is: The EU itself is indeed a WTO member, but each EU member state is still one of the 164 members of the WTO. Not sure that came through in your video(s).
But that's where the bargaining power comes from right? If a non-EU member wanted to veto something and EU country wanted to do, it's likely they've got that agreement with another EU company country that could scupper some sort of deal they have with them.
Now we've left we're all alone and at the mercy of all 164 of them
The question is not what Boris doesn't understand but what he does understand...
Thanks for easing off on the plugging, and getting more or less straight into it. Great video.
He doesn't have a clue really..... and he's going to run the country? 🤔....... 🤣🤣🤣
"and he's going to *ruin* the country?" - There, fixed that for you.
Not having a clue is his true power, the reason why he's pushed by the no-deal Brexiteers.
Never mind, he'll give all his supporters a laugh - so that's alright then.
The good news is that he's going to be Prime Minister, and not dictator.
@@captainmaim With open plans to prorogue Parliament to get his way on a no deal Brexit ? I know Trump wishes to deport members of congress based on skin tones but how is that not dictatorial ?
He says he will solve the Northern Ireland/Republic of Ireland border during the implementation period, even though if he gets No Deal as he desired there will be no transition period
Johnson is not good with details or the truth or reality. He is good to entertain at a party.
Technically I advocate the plan of “doing nothing” with the Irish border as a cynical way to get free trade with the EU without paying an access fee just because the EU and Ireland can’t stop the movement of goods across the Irish border because of the Good Friday Agreement.
Smuggling is a great way to avoid the EU’s tariffs destroying Britain, and no one can do anything about it if it is all done over the Irish border. It will slow trade down, but that is far cheaper than paying the tariff or the price of membership.
@@evannibbe9375 As the UK breaks the GFA with crashing out as the UK turns itself to a third country. It says in the GFA that it is between 2 EU countries (UK and Ireland) as the UK destroys it and replaces it with no other treaties they cause the mess.
@@evannibbe9375 tldr, when the uk leaves the eu the gfa auto breaks and then a hard border will be instated.
Welcome to part one of _What Boris Johnson Doesn't Understand About Brexit_ , a story serialised in 974 parts.
Excellent. This was one of your best digests. Well done.
Great content thanks. Keep up the good work.
Boris' main issue is, that he apparently believes the empire still exists. Reality is, that the Empire is olde history and that the former subjects all have thier very own interest way beyond the old master... with many of them likely having somewhat of a grudge and now having their own might to dictate terms in their favour.
And he apparently also believes that the "saying "No" and sitting out" tactic still works... PM May tried it and it failed spectacularly, because Art. 50 has the clock running against the leaving party.
He also forgot about why many international corporations put up tents in the UK: besides being corporation friendly, because the UK was EU member and as such member of the Single Market and Customs Union. With the Membership gone, the business friendliness will be found in other countries, such as the Netherlands and Ireland.
...also wasn't he supposed to lie in front of a bulldozer, to prevent the new runway in Heathrow?
as an irish person I remember being a young child in London in the 80's when there was an IRA bomb scare. My dad whispered to me to stay quite cus he didn't want anyone to hear our accents.
I'm really quite proud of how the relationship between our countries has changed since those dark days. It's great to see so many english, welsh and scots having the craic in dublin. And i never feel unwelcome in any part of brittain. Although it's not the full story, the EU played a big part in that new reality
I hope all that good work will not be undone by selfish politicians who would trade the peace and prosperity of europe just for personal political gain
@@derekscanlan4641: Reality is, with a hard Brexit, the Irish reunification is becoming a solid option. Not just that, but the Scots are likely to leave the UK as well, since large parts of the remain in the UK was actually a vote to remain in the EU.
A "Celtic Union", a federation with a unified Ireland would be Scotlands priority ticket back to the EU.
Hmmm... For once Google translate is useful... That's the great thing about legal language... It can only be understood one way. Even if that one way has multiple interpretations. In that case the language was deliberately chosen that way ;-)
In any case...
"The provisions of this agreement shall not be construed to prevent advantages accorded by any contracting party to adjacent countries in order to facilitate frontier traffic." translates in Dutch to "De bepalingen van deze overeenkomst mogen niet worden geïnterpreteerd als zijnde een beletsel voor het voorkomen van voordelen die door een verdragsluitende partij aan aangrenzende landen worden toegekend om het grensverkeer te vergemakkelijken."
In non-legalese English that means: The content of the agreement cannot prevent existing advantages that one party gave to the other party in order to make border traffic easier.
Or: Since the UK is part of a customs union which avoids tariffs, the UK may not reinstate tariffs after Brexit while using the GATT agreement as this would prevent the tariff free frontier traffic between the EU and the UK (which means between NI and Eire)...
So GATT article 3 prevents the UK from leaving the customs union as long as GATT is used unless they can prevent a hard border between the EU and the UK...
Essentially GATT = backstop, but with an additional 164 potential vetos...
Ontzettend bedankt!
@@kasupa14 Graag gedaan :-)
It's way easier to make a video of what bojo understands, it's a matter of seconds
it would be a scientific breakthrough - a video shorter than a single unit of planck time!
The EU is not going to agree on any future deal or negotiations , if the UK does not firstly agree on the divorce, the divorce bill, the northern Ireland border backstop, and the protection of EU citizens in the UK. When will them British understand that there is nothing after a no deal, its the cliff edge remainers warned about.
Someone yelling from the audience "Answer the damn question !!" was the funniest thing I saw this week .....
The Title should be "why Boris Johnson will not get his deal passed" You may be incorrect that he does not know that. or that he does not understand Brexit.
BJ is the perfect politician - totally clueless! He should fit in perfectly!
He and Trump will be BFFs
Whoa. I just realized what an unfortunate but fitting set of initials he has...
You may be unbiased, but the way you deconstruct brexiteer arguments often leaves little to no saving grace to them, showing that the preferable option clearly is remain.
All Johnson did with this interview is illustrate why he avoided giving them throughout the leadership race except when he had to be on TV. He should not be Prime Minister, but alas, Brexit does not care much for cold hard facts and he will still move into Number 10.
News Flash! If you just deal in facts and not fantasy, the only sane option is remain. What do you want TLDR to do, tell you fairy tales?
@@ionnanskilliorus6877 Nope, not at all. Just pointing out that while they don't directly pick a side, there clearly only remains one. Because a lot of "unbiased" reporting on TV at least comes down to allowing people like Johnson spew their lies and fantasies without questioning them. This interview was a nice change from that though because it clearly showed the many problems Johnson and his hard line brexiteers have.
the problem is, there's no other way to present it, in case you didnt realize, the problem is, the thing he is clinging to as safe net, ONLY works IF they have a deal. there's no sugar coating this, you cant have a no deal, and hope to use a "deal only" safe guard. it doesnt work like that!
This is why Johnson is running scared from his Andrew Neill Dec Leaders interview 💯🤣
Consider yourself also wrong about everything else.
What you don't get about BREXIT is that the best thing for the UK is no deal.
Correct, please elaborate
Well congratulations UK... It looks like you got there a slightly more educated and polished Donald Trump. Oh you are going to have so much fun...
He may yet prove to be more damaging, frankly. Trump talks the talk but doesn't often walk the walk; he hasn't done much actual harm, he just acts like a child on Twitter. Boris may, for all we know, turn out to be a total monster of a politician. The problem I'm finding is that he's so skilled at dissembling from his real personality for comic effect (years of practise on comedy panel shows) that it's impossible to tell what he really plans to do.
Mr Trump is doing a good job!! The economy and trade is record on a record high.. fact..
@@DylanJones-zc1cz morons don't do facts.
Increased border protection and immigration control, genuine and effective attempts at peace in foreign nations, a booming economy with record unemployment rates, all of the screeching, thoughtless detractors. You make it sound absolutely brilliant.
@@CharlieSpencers dishonest president = bum
TDLR seems pretty unbiased to me, but sometimes the HEADLINE is biased, even when the content is not. "What the hell is Boris Johnson's Plan?" is biased. Why not just "What is Boris Johnson's plan?" Make headline writers adhere to common journalistic standards, not marketing ones.
The bias is normally very subtle. Notice the overall direction of the video to guide the viewers towards a desired outcome. In this video the bias is in the editing style.
Welcome to reality. SMH 🤦🏻♂️
How will all this Brexit stuff effect Euro Truck Simulator 2?
These are the questions I want answered
We don't need more challengesn in ETS2, having to drive on the wrong side of the road and having our trucks with steering wheels on the passenger side is quite enough, thankyouverymuch.
To remain neutral when one side is obviously deceiving and/or irrational is to be biased. Enough with both side-ism.
You can report what the wrong side is saying. But then you need to call them out on their crap.
Ikr its awful all this pandering to remainers as if they have legitimate arguments.
The expression on Johnson’s face when he had to admit he doesn’t know what was in 5c was funny and scary at the same time . It was like a naughty schoolboy caught not having done his homework but instead of being sorry he wants to whack the teacher for catching him out .
I think the fall out from Brexit will make the Troubles look like a fight in a playground.
So in order to get round the problem of leaving the EU without an agreement, the UK would need an agreement with EU prior to invoking GAT article 24(B\ C). I will point out that Russia has already said they would block any such request. BoJo you are a typical self serving politician, someone who would say anything to get a lick of the brass ring.
I thought that was WTO and not gat24?
In any case reverting to WTO rules would just mean Russia doesn't trade with us they can hardly prevent us reverting to WTO rules?!
@@Darkwintre GAT is part of WTO, but is not the only agreement within WTO. TBH I don't really know what Russia can or cannot do, but they mean to do it out of spite.
I don't think he Boris understands where he is most of the time...
Your baised against lies, aka brexit, so you're basied against brexit.
3:22 “How would you handle paragraph 5C?”
“I would res...” 🤣
Anyone offended about this channel being biased about Bojo of Brexit needs to wake up. There’s differences in political views and then there’s just pure stupidity. Anyone who agrees with Bojo, or that Brexit was ever a good idea just hasn’t done their homework. Sorry to put it so bluntly, but “not hurting people’s feelings” isn’t helpful at this point...
When (or if) the uk leaves the EU I’d love a tldr channel for the EU
3 people reading your comment know what "tldr" is... oh, and me! Lol.
I know hes a conservative but first this guy humiliated Shapiro and now he goes after Johnston! 😂
Imagine... a journalist doing his/her job in spite of their own political beliefs. _Crazy._
/sarc
Aaron Cassidy Yeah but normally when you agree with your political opinions are similar its harder to be a good interviewer because you essentially have to play devils advocate.
Well Shapiro is a dumb persons idea of a smart person, so no surprise there. Little midget idiot
@@tomasroma2333 Then that is poor journalism. If you truly hold this belief, never be a journalist.
Aaron Cassidy Oh I don’t plan to be. I try and be factual but I don’t hid my bias. Instead I’m upfront and honest about my opinions which I try and back up with facts.
it's annoying when people think "non-partisan" means "never criticising anyone no matter how much they deserve it"
For the " What Boris Johnson understand about Brexit" video 1 minute would be enough.
More like 30 seconds :)
@@TurinStark5
Including the commercials.
Sándor Horváth a meme would suffice.