This kind of reminds me of a gambit line i discovered against the richter-veresov attack: 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nc3 d5 3. Bg5 c5 4. Bxf6 Nc6!!! where black gives up a knight but forces white to retreat and crushes them with their pawns and active pieces
Amazing idea ! I see quite a lot of potential for a strong pratical weapon since at first glance, White's path to refutation seems quite narrow. Will investigate further. Thanks !
Stockfish recommends 9. Kf1 just as a second option to Ne2 (in the knight going back variation). After Ne2 Qxg2 Ng3 (threatening to trap) Qh3 Qh5+ Black still had a slight advantage because of the horrible White pawn structure, but the attack is gone.
Happy to say I contributed to ~50 of the games in the database and some of the examples seem straight out of my games. As a mediocre player I can tell you I learned a bunch from this video alone. Particularly the Ne7 in the main line, I always opted for Nf6!
@@ga1ianoplays772 That’s the point. It’s only after black captures that it’s called the “young gambit” which means it’s a gambit from black’s perspective (but more realistically it’s just black blundering a queen).
Genuinely devastated that you’re not calling this the fishslayer counter-gambit.
It's funny because f5 now in the lichess database is THE highest winrate response against the Evans gambit
also against the Italian and Spanish in general 😂
This kind of reminds me of a gambit line i discovered against the richter-veresov attack:
1. d4 Nf6 2. Nc3 d5 3. Bg5 c5 4. Bxf6 Nc6!!!
where black gives up a knight but forces white to retreat and crushes them with their pawns and active pieces
Hahahaha what a gambit!
Amazing idea ! I see quite a lot of potential for a strong pratical weapon since at first glance, White's path to refutation seems quite narrow. Will investigate further. Thanks !
engine third choice as well!
hahaha you're my mind of lunatic. I am not sure but I think I may have done this too because it feels so right
what happens after 5. e4 and premove 6 Bb5? 😁
Future Supreme Commander in the war vs Sentient AI powered terminators
He'll be back...
I remember that game of yours vs stockfish. That was indeed a glorious moment for Humanity.
Always found it weird that Jonathan says “Italian” like somebody born in 1892
It's quite appropriate for this video given that the first recorded instance of this position being reached was in 1894 (Allies-Blackburne, Hastings).
You and Eric are one of the few who make chess fun and genuine for me, thank you :)
Stockfish recommends 9. Kf1 just as a second option to Ne2 (in the knight going back variation). After Ne2 Qxg2 Ng3 (threatening to trap) Qh3 Qh5+ Black still had a slight advantage because of the horrible White pawn structure, but the attack is gone.
Happy to say I contributed to ~50 of the games in the database and some of the examples seem straight out of my games. As a mediocre player I can tell you I learned a bunch from this video alone. Particularly the Ne7 in the main line, I always opted for Nf6!
And then he sacrifices THE KNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And then he sacrifices THE ROOOOOOOOOK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
after Nc3 as black i don't really know what to play, that's the most problematic line for me...
And then he sacrifices THE BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIISHOP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ah yes the greasy eye-talian game
And then he sacrifices THE QUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nope. This is still the worst gambit ever invented:
King's Gambit Accepted: Muzio, Sarratt, Young Gambit
its winning for white if accepted
@@ga1ianoplays772 That’s the point. It’s only after black captures that it’s called the “young gambit” which means it’s a gambit from black’s perspective (but more realistically it’s just black blundering a queen).
Looks unsound attack,maybe works for a bullet game
this hurts my head : play BxN
So are my openings not horrible enough to warrant videos ?
Jajajja
Day 43 of asking for a video on my funny English lines
And then he sacrifices THE QUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN!!!!!!!!!!!!